experimenta.1 study on elastic moclul:i of c:layey sediments under. undrained'...

16
JournalofGeosciences osakaCityUniversity Vo 1. 21 Art. 1 p. 1-16. March 1978 Experimenta.1 StudyonElasticMoclu l:i of C:layeySedimentsunder. Undrained' State Koichi NAKAGAWA and TsuneoOKUDA (with 2Tables and 16 Text Figures) Introd.uction Elastic modulus under infinite small strain level is one of the fundamental quantities tounderstandthestressstrainbehaviorof sediments. Among many factors that influ- ence the elastic modulus physicochemical factors may play importantroleinmechanical characteristics of clayey sediments. Measurementsofelasticmoduliofsedimentsbymeansofdynamicmethodhave beenappliedbyvariousauthorsfromdifferentpointsofview. Al so severalchemical analysisof sedin1entsandphysicochemicalargumentsrelatedwithbondingforcesinter clay-particles have beenreported. Effectsof confiningpressureoroctahedralmeanstressonelasticwavevelocityin granular substance such assandwerestudiedtheoretically by T AKAHASHI & SATO (1949) andGASSMANN (1951) and experimentally DUFFY & MINDLIN (1957) HARDIN & RICHART (1963) HARDIN & BLACK (1968) etc. Effectsofstrain levelon elasticity wereαamined experimentallybyHARDIN & DRNEVICH (1972) andSEED & IDRISS (1970). Effectson triaxialconsolidationandstrωhistorywereexaminedbyHARDIN & BLACK (1968) and AFIFI & RICHART (1973). Frequencyeffectsonrigidityofclayeysedimentswerere- po dby NAKAGAWA (1975). On theother hand a physicochemical treatment of bonding forcesof interparticle in water-electrolyte-claymineralsystemwastheoreticallymadebyOLPHEN (1963). The effectofdiffuseelectricdoublelayeroncompressibility WaS examinedbyBOLT (1956) basedon consolidation test. Relationships between mechanicalandchemical character- isticswereinvestigatedbyWHITE (1958) and by GRIM (1962). Statistical discussionsof the thermally activated process in deformation such as creep of clay were made by MURA YAMA & SHIBATA (1958) MITCHELL et al. (1969) andITO & MATSUI (1975). The report of reseachreferredtophysicochemicalaspectof theelastic modulusof clayey sediment however haveapparentlynotbeenpublishedtodate. Inthispaper weshallindicatetheresultsofmeasurementofelasticmoduliand chemicalanalysisofvariousclayey sediments in Osaka area anddiscuss briefly the relationshipbetweenelastic modulusandphysicochemicalfactors. TheauthorswouldliketoexpresstheirappreciationtoProf.T.KASAMAfor his

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Journal of Geosciences,osaka City University Vo1. 21, Art. 1, p. 1-16. March, 1978

    Experimenta.1 Study on Elastic Moclu,l:i of C:layey Sediments under. Undrained' State

    Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    (with 2 Tables and 16 Text Figures)

    Introd.uction

    Elastic modulus under infinite small strain level is one of the fundamental quantities

    to understand the stress strain behavior of sediments. Among many factors that influ-

    ence the elastic modulus, physicochemical factors may play important role in mechanical characteristics of clayey sediments.

    Measurements of elastic moduli of sediments by means of dynamic method have

    been applied by various authors from different points of view. Also, several chemical analysis of sedin1ents and physicochemical arguments related with bonding forces inter圃

    clay-particles have been reported.

    Effects of confining pressure or octahedral mean stress on elastic wave velocity in

    granular substance such as sand were studied theoretically by T AKAHASHI & SATO (1949)

    and GASSMANN (1951), and experimentally DUFFY & MINDLIN (1957), HARDIN & RICHART

    (1963), HARDIN & BLACK (1968), etc. Effects of strain level on elasticity wereαamined experimentally by HARDIN & DRNEVICH (1972) and SEED & IDRISS (1970). Effects on

    triaxial consolidation and strωhistory were examined by HARDIN & BLACK (1968) and

    AFIFI & RICHART (1973). Frequency effects on rigidity of clayey sediments were re-

    po巾 dby NAKAGAWA (1975).

    On the other hand, a physicochemical treatment of bonding forces of interparticle in water-electrolyte-clay mineral system was theoretically made by OLPHEN (1963). The

    effect of diffuse electric double layer on compressibility WaS examined by BOLT (1956)

    based on consolidation test. Relationships between mechanical and chemical character-

    istics were investigated by WHITE (1958) and by GRIM (1962). Statistical discussions of

    the thermally activated process in deformation such as creep of clay were made by MURA帽

    YAMA & SHIBATA (1958), MITCHELL et al. (1969) and ITO & MATSUI (1975). The report of reseach referred to physicochemical aspect of the elastic modulus of clayey sediment, however, have apparently not been published to date.

    In this paper, we shall indicate the results of measurement of elastic moduli and chemical analysis of various clayey sediments in Osaka area, and discuss briefly the

    relationship between elastic modulus and physicochemical factors.

    The authors would like to express their appreciation to Prof. T. KASAMA for his

  • 』ト

    2 Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    encouragement during the study. Thanks are due to Dr. M. TSURUMAKI, Dr. Y.T. IWASAKI and Dr. Y. N1SHIGAKI for tbe contiolJing discussion and criti:cal reading of the

    manuscrlpt.

    Method

    Elastic wave velocities

    The dynamic elastic moduli in this study have been determined by the measurement

    of P and S wave velocities and densities. P wave velocity was measured by the ultrasonic

    pulse transtnIssion method. For measurement of the S wave velocity, the three methods were l1sed in accordance with the sti:ffness of specimen.. The measurement of S wave ve-

    locity in the sti:ff specimens with lower void ratio characterized as higher rigidity than

    109 dyn/cm2 were carried out by the ultrasonic pulse transmission method. Contrarily, for the veηT soft specimens as higher void ratio than liquid limit state, the S wave velocity was measured by specially arranged shear pulse method consisting of high power shear pulse

    generator and magnetic pick up. The velocity was calculated from the relation of path

    length and travel time of shear pulse.

    'Peclmen

    Displ~çement :-analyzer Lineαlizet

    v. F. Co附 erter

    X-y

    Re1corder・

    B. T.

    Osdlloscope

    Frequency

    Counter

    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of experimental equipment of resonance column method.

    The resonance column method was applied to determine the S wave velocity for the

    other most specimens except very sti:ff or soft samples above mentioned. The resonance

    column method used in this study was essentially simi1ar to the one which have been

    used by other researchers, for example, ISHIMOTO & IIDA (1937), HARDIN & RICHART (1963), etc.

    The details of resonance column method have been reported elsewhere hy NAKA-

    GAWA (1975), however the receiver pick up has been improved from the velocity type of electro-magnetic transducer to the displacement type transducer.

    SchematIe diagram of the resonance columll test system is, showm ill Fig,. ] .

    The range of frequency in measur~ment is about 100 KHz for ultrasonic pulse

    transmission method, and 100-400 Hz for the resonance column method and for shear pulse method.

  • ""-=・

    Elastic moduli 01 clayey sediments under undrained state 3

    Chem.ical analysis

    An10ng many chemical factors, we thought that the cation exchangeable capacity and the composition of exchangeable cation hardly related to surface activity of the fine

    particle aggregate. Then, these analyses were rnade to examine this relation. The exchangeable cation were determined by the Peech method (FUNABIKI & AOMINE,

    1957). The sample of 10 g of dry powder was leached by 100 ml of ammonium acetate

    solution. After filtration of leaching solution, the filtrate was used for the analysis of each cation. Then, the exchangeable capacity was determined by the distrillation of the absorbed ammonium in the sample. .

    O'rganic carbon was determined by the wet oxidation by chrornic acid and by titration

    (JAKCSON, 1958). The method of fractionating humus is based on the extraction of organic matter

    from soil with caustic alkali and the futher subdivision of the extracted material by partial

    precipitation with mineral acid (BLACK, t965). And, humic carbon was determined by acid oxydation method using p0tasiurn permanganate solution.

    Specimen

    Undisturbed specimen

    Specirnens used for this study are mainly Pleistocene and Recent sedimentary clay

    in Osaka.IlThe specimens were obtained frorn the outcrop or boring cored sample, and

    N

    -As

    Osaka Bay

    Osaka City

    -Ab

    Sakai City

    ~Ki

    Kishiwada City

    。.Tu

    Ko •

    5 10 Km I I

    Fig. 2. Localities of sampling points.

  • 4 Kaicbi NAKAGAW A ana Tsum..e0 OKUD;A

    trimmed in cylindrical share with diameter of .abo;ut 5 cm and le~gth of about 10 cm for

    application to the reson.ance co[umn method. The range of the coll1oidal fraction. of

    using secliments is frQNl 10 %をo50 %. Loca]ities of sampling points are shown in Fig.. 2.

    Remolded specimen

    Remolded sp@cimens were p戸re叩pareωdaωs tおuUows. The specimen waωs' kmeaded s印ufι-t五ficientI砂yb)i hi埼:ghspe~d mix:er with add~mg d~おおfSi⑤釣~叫t

    pressed in the mo】制duωSi加nga s叩peeia[t旬aflilpe釘fwith diameter 0f .5..0 'cm. The filter paper

    and two porous were used iJn. ofrder to make a11 3!i'ound drainage. mn most cases, primary consolidation was completed at t50-20(() minutes. Total con:solidatiQJn period of the

    remolded s;pecimen was 23 hours. The extr~ded specimens of c]ay were cut into about

    10 cm length. Samples for the analysis of exehangeable cati0fl and organIlc IJlatter were air四 dried,

    ,gliound to pass a 120 mesmes sieve, and thoroughly. mi.xed.

    Experinteatal results

    Rigidity iD" n.atural state and! the results of chemircal analysis

    The measur吋 parameters@f tbe speeim.ens sueh as void ratI!Q, ,rigidity, li'quid Hmit and plastic limit or v;arious. s'edimentary elays' in Osaka are lIlsted in Table]. The

    rig,idities within a smaU strain Fange, a;bgqt )0:-6, were measured umder the atmospheric press:t)re and the MmdrallOed conditionふ

    The results. of ,ebemical aoa[ysis, of the specimens, ar.e l~sted in 'Tabfe 2.

    Effect of 'Straia a~pli仇Ide 、

    It is experimental1y' weU known fact tha~ e!astic moduli ol sedimeats clecrease with

    increase of strain.

    Fig. 3 shows the typieal relatroft be1tween the rigidity 3!sd tbe shear strain which is

    meaJsll~ed by reSQnaliilCe ~ethod :for tae sedむmeAtaryc~ay in Osaka Groupl.

    As C3!O be s'een from Fig. 3',. it appears, tkat t}t@re erists. some critica~ leVre~ of strain

    at whi.ch the fIJgidity starts to ,decrease. H(i)wever,. I!t should be noted tl¥at the magßlit~de ot ttbe eritIrcal .shear strain dぽeJswith each clay speci.mem.

    F or the purpose of the cQ1mparison of rigirditites' of various sedim.emts, ftot oruy the initial rigidity under sma]l strain level but also stllain effects on. the rigiditけysぬh.ouldbe

    taken into acoount.

    Effec~, Df an.iSQtropy

    GeneraUy, tae mecbanicat properti:es 0f tlile sedim.eated materials allie coRs-idered to slbow anisot,op,y, in-oons'eqlJence of p間 fet:)redoriIentation of the clay patrticles',. sowever, Fig. 4. ぬ-owsthe change of va;1111岱 ofmechanical com.staots ot tbe P~eistocene marine

  • Elastic moduli of clayey sediments under undrained state 5

    Table 1. Rigidities, void ratios, liquid limit and plastic limit of various sedimentary clays in Pleiはoceneand Recent strata.

    (*); Samtpled from boring oore.

    +』

    qdn

    n・1

    ・101

    p

    pゐ制円。 Depth Horizon Void Ratio

    Rigidity LL PL

    (m) (dyn/cm2 )

    Y

    +」e・1

    bAnLV

    .ェ田・L

    oa

    yk

    ma

    os

    k

    -10 Ma 1 Ko l 1.327 1.27 X 109 ー ー、

    Taishi目 bashiOsaka City

    ~17 Ma 6 Mo 6 1.845 8.51 X 108

    134 40

    Ma 10

    As 40

    As 4.2

    As 81

    As 83

    2.027

    2.055

    1.531

    1.285

    3.01 X 108

    7.04 X 108

    1.18 X 109

    1.31 X 109

    ー ー、‘.,,*

    f

    rt+」SL

    so

    aa

    yo

    --c .n s

    A

    -40

    ...42

    .,..81,

    -83

    Ma 12 ー ー

    92 33

    Kishiwada Ma 4

    Ki 38

    Ki 39

    Ki 59

    Ki 78

    Ki 91

    Ki 92

    Ki 109

    Ki 129

    K土ヱ30

    Ki 142

    Ki 173

    Ki 193

    1.807

    1.960

    1.367

    1.940

    1.327

    1.488

    0.706

    0.843

    0.934

    1.245

    1.970

    1.536

    a

    o

    A

    6

    6

    0

    a

    o

    a

    o

    a

    o

    a

    o

    a

    o

    a

    O

    A

    3

    A

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    υ

    n

    u

    n

    υ

    n

    u

    n

    u

    n

    u

    -

    -

    -

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    z

    l

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    nonu

    3

    nフ

    q,h

    n

    y

    且uzroauIEJ

    n司J8U1

    £J

    必uI

    守,

    r。、

    Jnυ

    3

    凋品

    1

    r

    o

    •••••••••••• 必噌

    I

    A句

    RJ

    I

    司4

    r

    O

    89

    67

    23

    28

    City

    -38

    -39

    -59

    -78

    -91

    -92

    -109

    -129

    -130

    -142

    -173

    司 193

    Ma 8

    (*)

    Kishiki-cho

    ーMa 6

    ny

    3

    凋品

    I

    E

    J

    JnwJnO

    U1

    no

    r

    E

    J

    噌ム

    J

    3

    3

    q

    ,-:Ma 3

    ー ーMa 2

    75

    117

    97

    3

    司3

    司4

    司3

    Ma 2 ?

    Ma 1

    Ma 0 ー ー

    Nariai Kumatori

    Town surface

    10wer Osaka Group

    Tu 2 0.845 8.99 X 108 68 26

    Y

    +」-l c

    a

    ok

    na

    es

    ぬ。

    -16 Ma 8 Ab 8 2.699 3.28 X 108 128 39

    C1ay

    Am 1

    Am 2

    Am 3

    Am 4

    Am 5

    Am 6

    Am 7

    Am 8

    且m 9

    Am 10

    Am 11

    Am 12

    Am 13

    Am 14

    Am 15

    Am 16

    Am 17

    Am 18

    1.819

    2.122

    2.163

    2.073

    2.117

    1.946

    2.102

    1.823

    1.914

    1.933

    1.713

    1.441

    1.188

    1.357

    1.594

    1.506

    0.691

    0.862

    6.45 X 107

    6.99 X 107

    6.65 X 107

    9.48 X 107

    1.10 X 109

    7.31 X 107

    9.95 X 107

    9.66 X 107

    8.63 X 107

    8.66 X 107

    1.01 x 108

    7.81 X 107

    7.64 x 107

    8.41 X 107

    7.76 X 107

    8.66 X 107

    2.49 X 107

    6.46 X 107

    J

    R

    J

    n

    τム

    n

    O

    Tム

    n

    o

    q

    J

    n

    u

    yム

    QU

    弓3

    ζ

    u

    n

    u

    o

    u

    r

    o

    7

    0

    0

    9

    9

    9

    9

    8

    8

    8

    8

    6

    5

    6

    7

    6

    2

    3

    1

    1

    auz

    胃ム

    ny

    にJ

    8品Z

    A

    U

    吋,h

    n『

    JAUEJnυ

    守,

    ronwJ

    '

    nフ

    弓3

    uz

    司3

    司3

    司J

    q

    J

    J

    q,

    3

    弓3

    J

    q

    4

    司,

    h

    q

    L

    司3

    J

    Ci七y

    - 9.9

    -11.4

    -11.5

    -13.5

    -14.3

    -15.4

    -16.5

    -17.1

    -18.5

    -18.9

    -19.6

    -21.1

    -21.7

    -22.5

    -22.7

    -23.7

    -24.4

    -25.9

    A11uvia1

    Samondo -

    River

    Amagasaki

  • 6 Koiehi NAKAG戸'AWA and Tsuneo, OKUDA

    Table 2. Cation exehangeable capacities, exchangeable 'cations, total organic carbons and humie carbons of variQus sedi,ments

    r

    噌4

    h

    u

    p-m

    ‘‘a'

    eyg

    qto

    nn・1

    0

    0ac-

    -1ha--

    cpe

    axam

    tvR“nuv

    ,、

    Mg* Ca * Na + c

    ・1-n

    、,

    、Anoa'

    aa一b

    (

    tqx

    ora

    T

    O

    C

    Humic

    Carbon e*

    (me/100g)

    + K

    (毛)

    Ko l.

    'Mo 6

    As 4'0

    As 42

    As 81

    As 83

    Ki 38

    Ki 39

    Ki 59

    K:f 718

    Ki 91

    Ki 912

    Ki 1'09

    Ki 129

    Ki 13:0

    Ki 142

    Ki 161

    Ki 173

    Ki 193

    Ki 222

    Tu 2

    Ab 8

    On 7

    Am 1

    Am 2

    Am 3

    tiln 4

    Am 5

    .Am '6

    Am 7

    Alro 8

    如n' 9

    Am 10

    Am 1正

    Am 12

    Am 13

    Am 14

    Am 15

    Am 16

    Am 17

    Am 18

    ヱ7.1323.'68

    24;88

    26.'916

    23.53

    22.34

    1,8.9,1

    18.04

    工5.0,5

    19.6'5

    21.64

    18.D1

    9.4''5

    13.08

    1'5.12

    24.02

    2'0.45

    17.44

    2'0.9,0

    10.4'5

    2'0'.30

    23.73

    2'9.IO,(i)

    2'2.'54

    25.73

    2'$.9'8

    2,4' .'07

    2 '~. 38

    1,8.67

    25.13

    21.81

    25.78

    25.07

    23.,87

    2ヱ.05

    18.04

    22.26

    37.8'9

    22.16

    8,.44'

    12.46

    13.06

    18.74

    9.77

    10'.5,8

    11. $,9

    11.77

    8,.5,1

    8.61

    9,.09

    19.19

    13.53

    8.50

    4.160

    5.46

    6.,27

    11.94

    12.71

    7.819

    9.66

    4.67

    7.8,3

    8.94

    16.94

    11.36

    15.34

    14.25

    13.37

    13.09

    10.0'4

    14.14

    11.88

    1.4.生4

    13.33

    12.4'3

    10.0'5

    7.83

    9.515

    1l.7 • 4'3

    1~)' O,s

    3,.8:4

    $ .'63

    4.92

    '8.4,6

    34.41

    3'2.19

    1,0.32

    9. 8:9

    2101.9)9

    3,6.83

    6.9'8

    9.41

    14.42

    4'.31$

    :3 .,84

    4.86

    5.64

    12.65

    2.67

    9.,,0,1

    9.94

    5,.51

    9.612

    14.61

    9.014

    9.13

    29'@ 42

    3;5.5,4

    38.24

    3'1.6'6

    3.5,. '8,8

    28.22

    12.46

    1-0. 3,9

    10.78

    10.13

    7.14

    3.3'8

    3.8:t

    9.22

    4'.416

    1.62

    2.57

    0.08

    3.35

    5.22

    3.1:9

    0.9'3

    0.7'7

    1.06

    1.11

    o.ヲ0(i)'.312

    0.45

    01.5'4

    D'.33

    01.41

    0,.3¥9

    0.62

    0.58

    0.4'4

    0.66

    0'.20

    01 • $,4

    0.76

    8'.26

    4.2'6

    8.99

    1,0'.6'8

    エ0.74

    12.04

    5.2'6

    1].99

    ヲ.3,8

    9,.83

    8'.30

    7.014

    8. '5~3

    5.37

    7.9'5

    9.21

    5.70

    4.56

    5.22

    0.09

    0.18

    2.63

    2.,'819

    2.26

    2.07

    2.27'

    2.28

    1.44

    o • 0'5 o.正王Oト.04

    0..61Q

    0.73

    01. 810

    エ.540.11

    0.814

    0,.93

    0.56

    .0.66

    1.12

    2.23

    3.,12

    4.10

    3.97

    3.82

    4.Q9

    2.7'8

    3.36

    2.38

    3,:27

    3.10

    2.97

    2.8:2

    1.96

    2,.10

    1.68

    0:.'96

    01.6,4

    0.90

    1.02

    1.37

    1.09

    10216

    6.66

    0'.,6,3

    0.8,)

    0.89

    o • 9'1 1.35

    0.'91

    0.93

    0.24

    0.35

    0.'51

    0.59

    1.23

    0.'53

    (i). 74

    0.15

    0.43

    1.38

    3.'00

    1.52

    1.59

    1.51

    1.33

    1.32

    91.92

    1.18

    1.05

    1.19

    1.23

    ].17

    1.01

    1.1..4

    1.78

    4.84

    4.25

    (L49

    0.98

    ,0,.043

    0.11

    0.18

    01'.21

    0.046

    0.02'9

    01.13

    01 • ヱ2

    0.048

    D.19

    6.10

    0.13

    0.008

    0.024

    O~. 0,47

    0.042

    0.067

    o • 0'8:0 0.14

    O.D04

    0.811

    0.28

    O.8'0

    0.17

    0.20

    0.1,9

    0.13

    0~28

    D.Jl.8

    0.12

    D.12

    0.13

    O.エ3

    0.13

    0,.12

    0.21

    01.35

    0.96

    1.52

    0.11

    0.24

    1.598

    2.155

    2.155

    2.2,87

    1.7'92

    1.745

    2.061

    2.192

    1.6,66

    2.084

    2.DSO

    1.8'01

    0.930

    0.996

    1.254

    2.'0ヲ8

    1.810

    ヱ.'94[0 2.49'0

    0.9O4

    1.3'04

    2.611

    2'.367 、-ー--ー

    -ー

    -圃.

    --ー

    -圃.

    --由

  • Elastic moduli 01 clayey sediments under undrained state 7

    2

    K 1 193< (N)

    e、aE ^ υ10" ‘h C 〉、

    KI 91 (N)

    K1130 (N) 18

    ω 、.41

    Z16 E 。、.0 仏

    i一一・ぐ i /i VS 10-J ¥ .//

    • -- ¥一〉同 A b 8

    1

  • Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    τ ττ7 I τ τ 1

    ---

    • 寸10'0← 8

    "".1" ヘ @ト唯旬、通項哲治ー償制F

    2 3 1

    。島 。 Bul k Modulus

    • 4‘ • Rlgtdity

    10'0

    5

    10"

    5

    NEυ~ch刀

    • ー

    • 109

    二コ旬。芝

    LL L 。。。

    。。。

    も。8

    P.l

    4 •

    109ド

    108←

    NEυ~ch司

    U 1 t rαsonic Pulse Trarnsmlsslon Method

    • 、万一-一

    ー。Resonance Col umn

    Method

    。107ト

    可コ a

    ,-、・b'‘

    i,

    2 ・ー• •

    • -5

    U一一宇的ロ}凶

    。。。。。

    Righ Power SR Wαve Generatlon Method

    106ト

    。、

    -ーα

    •• • • .. 、.A... .-2、#: 108

    5

    l' ...L 3.0

    ' 」2.0

    • L '-0

    l' 内

    υ

    Eg nu

    aE

    ・・ 3.0 2.0

    R a t i 0 1.0

    Void

    。R a t i 0 V-0 i d

    Relation of bulk modulus and rigidity with void ratio for Osaka clay, calcu-lated from P and S wave velocities. The solid line is calculated from the equation (1). 1; Pleistoncene sedi-ments 2; Recent sediments 3・

    remolded specimens.

    Fig. 6. Relation between rigidity and void ratio of remolded specimen obtained from Pleisto-ceme marine c~ay, Ma 6. U]trasonic pulse and SH Wave transmission method have been carried out for eonsolidated specirnens at the end of primary consolidation. Reso-nance column method were applied to specimens about 1300 minutes after end of primary consolidation.

    Fig. 5.

    、、.,,4EA

    ,,EE

    • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 . e 一 一 一Kg

    . Kw 1+e Ks

    :' bulk modulus of soils as solid and water Ks where, b叫kmod叫USoa bost rock (Kg=3.87x 1011 dynfcm2)

    :b叫kmodulus of water (Kw=2.40x 10J.0 dynfcm2)

    -• Kg k匁)

    : void ratio. e

    The value of Kg is of Rokko granite which is supposed to be main host rock in Osaka

    clay. The equation (1) is known as Wood equation (Woon, 1930) and rigorously derived by ISHIHARA (1968). Therefore, this experimental results show that bulk modulus of

    Quaternary sediments in Osaka is mostly independent of their structures such as grain

    size, shape of grain, etc., except for the composition which relates to the void ratio, the degree of saturation and kind of the.forming minera1. The rigidity of sediment, however,

    can not be related directly to tbe voIld ratio and compositi∞.

    Relationship between rigidity and vord~ ratio

    Using the resonance method, HARDIN & RICHART (1963) studied the effects of void

  • 9

    Their em-

    Elastic moduli of clayey sediments under undarined state

    ratio and hydrostatic confining pressure on the S wave velocity of sands.

    pirical1y obtained equations are expressed by ,eq. (2) and (3).

    For round-grained sands

    …・・…(2)G = 697 _{2.17-e)2UFO-5 1+e ..,

    For angular-grained sands

    -…………( 3 ) G = 32612.96-e)2 b 0・51十e '"

    where, G c: hydrostatic confining pressure. HUMPHRIES & W AHLS (1968) and HARDIN & BLACK (1969) examined the applicability

    of the above relations to clay. One of the common results drawn from two investigations

    implys that the rigidity of clay with high surface activity is much complicated and

    different from those of sand. The effect of consolidation pressure of several Quaternary

    As shown in the figure, there is an important difference sediments is shown in Fig. 7. between sandy and clayey sediment.

    Several experimental results of sediment' s rigidities with void ratio are plotted for

    remolded state as well as natural state shown in Fig. 8. Slopes of the lines between the

    log rigidity and the void ratio in remolded state are found to vary widely with types of

    1012

    5and 109

    Natural

    ' --e a

    Granite Rokko

    10" e‘ E u -c 〉、.。

    Ma 8

    :トk cley ヘ ¥と吋

    AM 8

    Clay

    Eυ~ch刀

    〉、

    ‘ ....

    刀 109

    σ、

    広‘. 、、

    ‘.

    , 、、、、、 、・ 、、

    ,、4ぬu'

    ,‘EE-

    -

    ¥1・

    、、

    、、、、

    、、、、

    、、、、

    、¥

    ¥

    、、

    05

    〉、 108

    司....

    て3

    01

    α: 108 、、、

    •• ••• 、Study

    。¥、 Plot ot Hardin's Equatlon

    、.....Present

    107

    30 2.0

    R a t i 0 1.0

    Void nv

    句,nu ---2.5

    ¥

    0.5 2.0 1.5

    R a t i 0

    1.0

    Vo i d

    E玄amplesfor the relation between

    rigidity and void ratio for several

    specimens. The arrows show the

    reduction of rigidity for remolding.

    Fig. 8. Relation between rigidity and void ratio

    under drained and confined state for vari-

    ous specimens. The arabic numerals

    beside the solid line show the confining

    pressure (kgfcm2).

    . Fig. 7.

  • 10 Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    Fig. 9. Relation between rigidity and efe* for

    remolded specimens.

    Fig. 10. Relation between e* and cation ex・changeable capacity.

    sediments. As shown in the figure, their straight lines appear to be concentrate at a certain point when the void ratio is nearly zero. lt seems that the slopes in the figure

    depend upon interparticle characteristics in sediment. The higher steepness of the

    slope is found to correspond to the lower rigidity of the sediment with the same void ratio.

    To understand more easily this relation, for the sake of convenience, a special void ratio, e*, is defined as void ratio at which the specimen shows the rigidity of 108 dynfcm2

    in remolded state. Therefore, relative magnitude of the rigidity, i.e., the interparticle bdnding forces among the various kind of clay, can be compared using the e*.

    The values of rigidity and of eJe* for each specimen are plotted in Fig. 9. This stra-ight line is formulized by least squares method and it is expressed as follows;

    Log Grz10.385-2.3754 e-"

    where, Gr: rig,idity of remolded specimen.

    Rigidity and chemical property

    . . . .……(4)

    Because of the e* may be used as an index of the relative activity of clayey sediment as above mentioned, the results of chemical analysis were compared with e* for the various kinds of clayey sediments to investigate the relationship between e* and physicochemical propertles.

    The relation between e* and cation exchangeable capacity is almost positive linear, as shown in Fig. 10.

    RASHID & BROWN (1975) pointed out that the organic matter especially humic acid, plays an important role for the mechanical properties of sediments from their investi-

    gation for compression test of several kinds of sediments.

    However, the exchangeable capacity of organic matter was hardly analyzed by using

  • Elastic moduli of clayey sediments under undrained state 11

    the ammonium acetate as in the Peech method. Because of the extreme high value of

    exchangeable capacity of humic acid compared with that of other component of organic

    matter, exchangeable capacity of organic matter is governed and determined by the quantity of humic acid in organic matter ..

    The content of humic acid is usually estimated from humic carbon content based on

    the following relation,

    HA=RwxHC

    Eventually,

    CEC= Ceυ×ム+Cec,hx型100' , 100

    ……………( 5 )

    where, CEC : total cation exchangeable capacity of sediment (mej100 g) Cec, i : cation exchangeable capacity of inorganic part (mej100 g)

    乙:percentage of inorganic part in the sample (%) Cec, h : cation exchangeable capacity of humic acid (200-400 mej100 g) HA : humic acid (%)

    Rw : weight ratio (キ1.7)of humic acid to humic carbon (JACKSON, 1958) HC : humic carbon (%)

    Fig. 11 shows the relation between CEC and e*.. The coe伍cientsof correlation

    for data plots in. Fig. 10 ar吋 Fig.11 are 0.79 and 0.85 respectively. 1n this figure, it should be noted that the data contain wide range of specimen material from fat clay of

    montmolli1onite to silt of crushed granite.

    The relation between e* and total cation exchangeable capacity shown in Fig. 111 may

    be expressed as follows from least squares method.

    1..0

    3.0

    2.0ト

    e持

    。。

    • •

    /.・-y •

    ー/三..

    10 20 30

    Total Cation Exchangeable Capacity mell00 9

    Fig. 11. Relation between e* and total cation exchangeable capacity.

    A plot in right-up-wards coordinate is Na-montmollilonite

    benthonite.

  • 12 Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    * e O.0767x CEC+O.226 ………・(6 ) The equation shows the strong linear relationship between CEC and e*. The value

    of the CEC is thus considered as one of the factors to control

    bonding force of the particle. * e"-, and consequently the

    No consistent direct correlation was found between the value of e* and the compo圃sition of exchangeable cation.

    . . . . . • • • • • ・.. . ・.. ・・.• • • • .

    • • • • .

    :-P:・:-:-:-:--.

    Fig. 12.

    External J="orce

    Van der Waals

    At tractive

    Force

    yノ

    Bonding Material

    旬、fgroミil)

    Doable Layer

    Repulsive

    Force

    Crystal

    Partic/e

    • 。

    聞.".・.・・・.・・.・・・.. . . .... .'.~ - 00" ー.一一 . :.. . .一.一.'_'.o・・・.・・・ ・・・.・ ・-・今'.. . . . .一一 一・.・..・・一・・.. . ・..... .

    • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .・

    Cσtion

    Anion

    Amorphous Matter

    Highly Oriented

    Moleculσr Zone

    Linked Zone with Molereular Cha /('1

    Liquid Phase

    Microstructural model of clayey sediment. (after NAKAGAWA et al., 1977)

  • Elastic moduli of clayey sediments under undrained state 13

    争骨e

    3.0

    2.0

    '.0

    。。

    Fig. 13.

    /

    50

    Liqt;Jid

    ー・・/・•

    100

    Li m i t

    150

    Relation between e* and liquid limit.

    7 一τ 7 1 I 1

    '.0ト.'.. 、ヘ‘。崎.a d. 00 ". ~。 ... Jロ• . t.. Q ,、 一

    〉、..... 勺

    m z

    0.9← 勺QI

    N

    U

    E ‘-。

    z 0.8←

    Fig. 14.

    ・. .ロ..- .. ‘・ 4‘.

    よ-10・6

    • K I 130 ・KI 92 A K I 109 ・KI 129 o KI 91 I

    U-Ab-L'

    ー よ-10-5

    Shear

    • 4‘ •

    Strain

    • -. 0 0向。.・ 。0_• Vo

    " ・・ O~d .. 哩ロ ・ロ。

    • 4‘ a

    - ・・ 。 ー1. ._・。

    • 4‘

    a‘ 4‘

    t. ... 0

    ‘-.. ロ・。

    4‘

    。 . .l ・. - -• ‘ d a ・‘ ..

    a

    • 0 • • .

    よー.10・4 10・3

    Example for the relation between normal-ized rigidity, GJGo and shear strain for typical specimens.

    with the specific surface Further discussion will be necessary on the relationship

    area of material or the electrolyte concentration of water solution.

    From these experimental results, the microstructural model was suggested by NAKA-GAWA et al. (1977) as edge-to-surface contact structure shown in Fig. 12. The relation

    between the rigidity and the cation concentration will be reported in detail at a later date.

    Fig. 13 shows the relation between liquid Iimit (LL) and e*, and that e* is nearly proportional to LL. This relation is expressed as follows with some scattering.

    e*=0.022xLL -・・・・………(7)

    From a relation e* and Atterberg liquid limit, the both indices are considered to denote the material characteristics with common physical base.

    Effect of strain amplitude

    Generally, the rigidity of granular substance decreases with increase of shear strain leve1. As shown in Fig. 3, the rigidity is almost constant, if the strain is smaller than a certain criticaI Ieve1.

    Fig. 14 shows the relation between GjGo and shear strain. Where, Go is rigidity at a small strain. The point at which the rigidity starts to decrease depends upon a kind of

    sediments. But it seems that the shape of decreasing curve of rigidity is independent of

    the difference of specimens. And the shapes obtained in present study agree approximately

    with the data of sand of HARDIN & DRNEVICH (1972).

    'rhe experimental relatIon between Go and the critical strain To・9 are plotted for

    several specimens shown in Fig. 15. 'The critical strain To・9 is de:fined by the shear

    strain at which the rigidity becomes 90 % of Go• As it seems that r 0.9 is proportional to Go in the same kind of specimen with different void ratio and its slope is a function of

    the value of e*, we shall estimate some constants graphically as following eq.uation,

  • Koichi NAKAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA 14

    。Ab 8 ・KI 193 A K I 91

    ・KI 130 V KI 129 ロ KI 109

    ../ ./

    今/

    /. ,rF

    15 舎、‘

    E υ 旬、.C 〉、

    て3tD

    o

    10

    5

    (ω・0l

    z一ω)。ο

    o Jlb 8 e・・260 ・"1 193 0・・2 49 A KL 91 e".l 81 ・K1 130 0..1 73 v Kl 129 o'・o99 ロ Kl 109 e'-O 93

    ‘50ma 5tando¥d ~anι 。 唱11tySond

    d /

    5 。dE υ ‘、.C 〉、

    てコ

    109

    〉、司俳d

    てコロ、

    広108

    5

    5

    10 20

    Critical Shear Stram

    30 10・4

    。。10-2 5 5 10・3Shear Strain

    10・4

    Critical 5

    the value, critical shear

    Relation between

    Go{げー0.5)and straln, r 0.9・

    Fig. 16. Relation between rigidity at smal1 strain

    level and critical shear stram, r 0・9Fig. 15.

    ……( 8 ) γ0・9e*-0.5

    Go = 0.50 X 1012

    Go(e*-0.5) and γ0・9are shown in Fig. 16 with the scatter in

    We get an experimental equation as folIows,

    The relation between

    a reasonable range.

    ……・(9) ro・9= 2Go(e*ー 0.5)X 10-12

    be expressed convenient form as, Accordingly, it can

    -……(10) 2=1ー αr1.5

    where,αis constant depending Q,n the kind of sediment. The equation (10) is valid within the strain range under which the rigidity decrease to 70 %.

    From the equations (9) and (10),

    、Ea''

    EA

    4

    ・A,,EE

    • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1.5 X 1016 γ Go(e*-0.5)

    三=1-3.535 x G。

    Rearrangement by substitution of the equation (7) into (11), G/Go is expressed as follows,

    、EE,,

    ヴ'M

    4EA

    rsE

    、• • • • • • • 1・5X1017

    、EE,,今

    、u向

    Jヲ“ヮ“γ一一L

    L

    ,,目、、G

    三=t-4.503 x G。

    'Fhis equation suggests that the strain effect on the value of rigidity may be obtained

    simply from the data of liquid limit and initial rigidity.

    Conelusion'

    1n the present study, the dynamic rigidity at lower strain level of the Pleistocene and Recent elayey sediment distributed in! .Osaka anq its vicinity was described. 'The chemi-

  • Elastic moduli of clayey sediments under undrained state 15

    cal analysis of the sediments was also made for the investigation of physicochemical

    factors influencing mechanical characteristics. An important problem of physicochemical

    mechanism of interparticle bonding in clayey sediments has been left unsolved.

    The conclusions obtained in this study are shown as follows;

    (1) The results from measurement of the rigidity of undisturbed clayey sediment at

    lower strain and the chemical analysis are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.

    (2) Anisotropy of tbe m.echanical properties such as the velocities of longitudinal and

    shear waves and its damping factor have not been found so far as the material tested.

    (3) The relation between the bulk modulus obtained from wave velocity and the void

    ratio for soft sediment can be given as following equation,

    ー一必 l+e

    1 , e 一 一 一Kg . Kw

    where, the parameters of Ks, Kg and Kw are the bulk modulus of bulk structure of sedi-ment, granite and respectively water, and e is void ratio. For the relation between the rigidity and the v:oid ratio, no simple relation as above can be found in various kinds of sediment. ln remolded state of clayey material, the relation between the rigidity and the void ratio is found to show following simple form over the wide range,

    Log G = a-be

    where, a and b are constants and depend on the physicochemical properties of the clay. 'Fhis equation appears to be valid for various kinds of remolded specimen.

    (4) The relation between the cation exchangeable capacity and the value of e* is obtained

    as following empirical equation,

    e* = 0.0767x CEC+0.226

    where, e* defined as void ratio at which the specimen shows the rigidity of 108 dyn/cm2

    in remolded state.

    The relation between the e* and the liquid limit LL is given as,

    e* = 0.022xLL

    (5) The rigidity of sediment is generally affected remarkably by the strain level. But, the rigidity is almost constant in the very smal1 strain region. The magnitude of the critical

    strain differs with each specimen. The empirical equations of rigidity related to the

    strain level are obtained as follows,

    G = Go-3.535 x附 xGバJ¥15¥e*-O.5 G = Go-4.503 X 10

    17 X GõO•5(γ5 、LL-22コ3where, r is shear strain, LL is liquid limit and Go is the rigidity in small strain level.

  • 16 Koichi NAGAGAWA and Tsuneo OKUDA

    References

    AFIFI, 8.S. & F.E. RICHART (1973): Stress history effects on shear modulus of soils. Soil and FoundationsJ ]SSMFEJ 13, No. 1, p. 77-95.

    BLACK, C.A. (1965): Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Wisconsin~ p. 1409.

    BOLT, G.H. (1956): Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure clay. Geotechnique,

    6, No. 2, p. 8“6一-913DUFFY丸, J. & R.D.恥MINDLI江I悶N (1957): Stress-strain relation of a granular mediurn. ]our. Appl.

    Mech., Trans. ASCEJ Pec., 1'. 585-593. FUNABIKI, S. & S. AOMINE (1957): Soil analysis (in Japanese). Yokendo, To~yo, p. 147. GASSMANN, F. (1951): Elastic waves through a packing of spheres. GeophysicsJ 15, p. 673'-685. GRIM, R.E. (1962): Applied clay mineralogy. McGraw-Hill, New York. HARDIN, B.O. & W.L. BLACK (1968): Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay. ]our.

    Soil. Mech. and Found. Div'J Proc. ASCEJ 94, SM 2, p. 353=-369. HARDIN, B.O. & V.P. DRNEVICI王 (1972): Shear modulus and damping in soils; Measurement

    and paraaeter efFeets. ]omに Soil.Mech. and Found. Div'J Proc. ASCEJ 98, 'SM 6, t'. 603-624.

    HARDIIN, B.O. & F.E. RICHAR1' (1963): Elastic wave velocities in granular soUs. ]OU!f. So,仏 Mech.and Found. Div'J Proc. ASCEJ 89, SM 1, p. 33-65.

    HUMPHRIES, W.K. & H.E. WAHLS (1968): Stress history effects on dynamic modulus of clay. ]our. Soil. Mech. and Found. Div.J Proc. ASCEJ 94, SM 2, p. 371-389.

    ISHIHARA, K. (1968): Propagation of compressional waves in a saturated soi1. Proc. of the Interna・tional Symp. of Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth MaterialJ Univ. df New

    お1:exicoPress.

    lSHIMOTO, M. & K. IIDA (1937): DeterminatIon ,o'f elas,tlIc constafl~S of soils by means of vibration method. Part 11. Modulus of rigidity and Poisson's ratio. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst'J Tokyo Univ., 15, p. 67-86.

    ITo, T. & T. MATSUI (1975): Plastic flow mechanism of clays (in Japanese). Proc. ]SCEJ No. 236. JACKSON, M.L. (1958): Soil chemical analysis., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p. 211. MITCHELL, J.K., A. SINGH & R.G. C'AMPANELLA (1969): Bonding, effective stresses and strength of

    soils. ]our. Soil. Mech. and Found. Div'J Proc. ASCEJ 95, SM 5, p. 1219-1246. MURAYAMA, S. & T. SHfBATA (1'958): On the rh.eological characteristics of clays. Part 1, Bull.

    Disast. Prev. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 26. NAKAGAWA, K. (t975): Measurement of shear wave velocity ~n soi1s,. JOU!f. Geosci., Osaka City

    Univ., 19, p. 139-147. NAKAGAWA, K., Y.T. IWASAKI, T~ OKUDA & M. TSURlJMAKI (1977): Elastic moduli of un-

    drained clayey 80iis based on clay-water-electrolyte system. Constitutive Equations of SoilsJ IX

    lnternatiQnal Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringJ TokyoJ p. 207-211.

    OLPHEN, V.H. (1'963): An introduction to olay colloid chemistry. Interscience, New York. RASHID, M.A. & J.D. BROWN (1975): Influence of marine organic compounds on the engineering

    properties of a remolded sedim.ent号、 Eng.Geol., 9, p. 14t-154. SEED, H.B. & I.M. IDRISS (1970): Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses.

    Earthq. Eng. Res. CenterJ Coll. of Eng., Univ. oJ Cali.J Rep. No. EERC 70-10., p. 1-15 TAKAHASHI, T: & Y. SATO (1949): On the theory of elastic waves in granular substance. Bull.

    Earthq. Res. Ins., Tokyo Univ・, 27, p. 11-16. WHITE, W.A. (1958): Water sorption properties of homoionic elay minerals. Rep. Investz"gation,

    208, Illinois state Geol. Surv., p. 7-46. WOOD, A.s. (1930.): A te:;ctbook of sound. G. BeI1 & Sons, London.

    可.