experimental investigation of detonation re-initiation mechanisms following a mach reflection of a...
DESCRIPTION
Rohit Bhattacharjee's MASc thesis seminar presentation - University of Ottawa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, November 2012. All rights reserved.TRANSCRIPT
Experimental Investigation of Detonation Re-initiation Mechanisms
following a Mach Reflection of a Quenched Detonation
Rohit R. Bhattacharjee
M.A.Sc candidate
Matei I. Radulescu Advisor
MCG seminar Date – November 9th, 2012
Introduction
• Detonation waves are supersonic combustion waves
– Compression waves (p1~=20p0)
– Supersonic (M~=6)
• Practical applications include
– Detonation arrestors
– Pulse detonation engines
• Fundamental theory on detonations
– Zel’dovich-von Neumann-Doering (ZND) Theory
Ideal (ZND) Detonation Wave
Real detonations
Mach Reflection
Forward jetting slipline
Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability
Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability
Propagation mechanism
• Real detonations are different from ideal model
– 3D, transient, unsteady, cellular
– Multiple shock structure
– K-H, R-M instabilities, forward jet
• What is the propagation mechanism?
– Adiabatic shock compression
– Turbulent mixing
• Mechanisms involved in the detonation cell evolution
Self-propagating detonation cell cycle
Self-propagating detonation cell cycle
Self-propagating detonation cell cycle
Self-propagating detonation cell cycle
Self-propagating detonation cell cycle
Detonation re-initiation
Decoupled incident
shock flame complex
Re-initiated Mach
shock
Stochastic behaviour
a b c
Experiment 1
Experiment 2
a b c
p0 = 3.5 kPa
CH4+2O2
p0 = 3.5 kPa
CH4+2O2
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Diffraction around obstacles
Mach reflection behind
obstacle
Mach reflection in
planar detonation
Diffraction around obstacles
• Detonation diffraction around an obstacle
– Quenches detonation wave
– Forms a decoupled shock-flame complex
– Shock front reflects to form a Mach reflection
• Benefits of detonation diffracting around obstacles
– Improve temporal and spatial resolutions
– More reproducible
– Retain main features of cellular gas dynamics
• Adopt technique to study re-initiation mechanisms
Detonation diffraction and re-initiation – Past study example 1
Teodorczyk, A., J.H.S. Lee, and R. Knystautas. 1991. Prog. Astronaut. and Aeronaut. 133:223–240.
T. Obara, J. Sentanuhady, Y. Tsukada, S. Ohyagi, Reinitiation process of detonation wave behind a slit-plate,
Shock Waves 18 (2) (2008) 117–127.
Detonation diffraction and re-initiation – Past study example 2
Detonation diffraction and re-initiation – Past study example 3
M. I. Radulescu, B. M. Maxwell, The mechanism of detonation attenuation by a porous medium and its
subsequent re-initiation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 667 (2011) 96–134.
Objective
• Past results have identified several ignition mechanisms
– Adiabatic shock compression behind Mach stem,
– Kelvin-Helmholtz instability along the slipline,
– Richtmyer-Meshkov instability along the flame,
– Rapid combustion behind transverse wave
– The strong forward jetting of slipline behind Mach stem
• However, the key re-ignition mechanisms leading to re-initiation have not yet been clarified
• Isolate re-ignition mechanisms that lead to re-initiation following a Mach reflection of a shock-flame complex
Experimental Setup
M. Drolet, Design of an experiment to study the instability of
detonation waves, undergraduate thesis, University of Ottawa,
Mechanical Engineering Department, 2008.
L. Maley, Shock reflections in reactive gases, undergraduate
thesis, University of Ottawa, Mechanical Engineering
Department, 2012.
Experimental Setup (cont’d)
Courtesy – Thanos Drivas
Inert shock reflections
Roughness induced ignition
t = t1 t = t1+90µsec t = t1+70µsec Courtesy – Logan Maley,
Kadeem Deniese
Roughness induced ignition
Mach reflection with self-ignition
Mach reflection with self-ignition
Mach reflection with self-ignition
Mach reflection with self-ignition
Detonation re-initiation
Detonation re-initiation
Detonation re-initiation
Detonation re-initiation
Detonation re-initiation
Conclusion
• Forward jetting behind the Mach stem was found to be an important mechanism in increasing combustion rates
• For sufficiently strong Mach stem, re-initiation first appears along the Mach stem
• Rapid ignition of the tongue of unburnt gas via turbulent mixing (shock ignition, KH instability) could lead to re-initiation of transverse wave
Acknowledgements