extreme relativistic optics: turning matter transparent

21

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jun-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent
Page 2: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Aaron Bernstein

Associate Director

Texas Center for High

Intensity Laser Science

Mike Donovan

Associate Director

Texas Petawatt Laser

Alan Wootton

Associate Director IHEDS

John Keto

Research Scientists:

Gilliss Dyer Hernan Quevedo

Post Docs:

Rashida Jafer Ishay Pomerantz

Erhard Gaul

Chief Scientist &

Engineer, TPW

Mikael Martinez

Chief of Operations, TPW

TPW Professional Staff 15 Ph.D. Students, + 7 Undergrads

+ 9 part-time Undergraduate Research Assistants

Admin Staff: Maria Aguirre Sharee Aery

+ 1 undergrad

Todd Ditmire Mike Downer Roger Bengtson B. Manuel Hegelich

Page 3: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Parameter space and motivation

Status at the Texas PW laser

How to reach ultrahigh intensities Conventional optics

Plasma optics

Science at I > 1022 W/cm2 and what can be done now Single electron dynamics

Radiation reaction in plasmas

Pair cascades

Outlook

Page 4: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Elementary processes

in strong external field

have been extensively

studied.

Classical

relativistic

plasma

QED

plasma?

Strongly damped

regime?

How will these

processes affect

collective plasma

phenomena?

Page 5: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Hybrid OPCPA – Glass system

160 J

150 fs

Two target areas TA-1: short focal

length ○ F/3, r ~ 5mm

○ I ~ 1021 W/cm2

TA-2: long focal length ○ F/40, r ~ 100mm

○ I ~ 1018 W/cm2

Page 6: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Pulse energy ~ J - kJ

Focal spot size ~ 1 - 100 mm

Pulse duration ~ 10 – 1000 fs

Pulse shape deviation from ideal

Gaussian

Spatial Pulse Shape

Temporal Pulse Shape

Page 7: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Conventional optics

well understood

material damage threshold

Examples

high bandwidth amplifiers

CPA

(non)linear pulse

cleaning/shaping

focusing mirrors

adaptive optics

Plasma optics

no damage threshold

hard to control

Examples

Raman amplifiers

self-focusing

self phase modulation

plasma mirrors

wavelength conversion

Page 8: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Current status

E = 160 J

r = 5 mm (30%)

t = 150 fs FWHM

I ~ 1021 W/cm2

Energy increase is not feasible.

Use 2nd adaptive mirror after the

compressor to improve the wave

front.

Use F/1 focusing optics to reduce

spot size to less than 2 mm.

Use Pockels cell, USP booster

amplifier, and OPAPE pulse cleaner

to improve the temporal pulse profile.

Page 9: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Plasma Mirrors $ 0.1

( Antireflective coated 100$)

Target Prepulse passed!

Throughput: 50-60%

Page 10: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Elec

tric

Fi

eld

Dl(t)

t

Initial Pulse

Fiel

d E

nve

lop

e Dl(t)

SPM with dispersion and delayed nonlinearities

Pulse Modulation

Pulse Energy

0.3 mJ

3.5 mJ

450 fs 0 ps -450 fs

4 m 10 m 23 m

450 fs 0 ps -450 fs

450 fs 0 ps -450 fs

Pulse self-compression Pulse modulation

Bernstein, A.C. (2004). Measurements of Ultrashort Pulses Self-focusing in Air. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New Mexico, USA.

Page 11: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Pulse compressed from 120 fs to 29 fs

(~4x).

53% of energy is contained in the first peak.

Long gas cell could enable > 2x power

compression on TPW.

<2 mm thick window supported by

a thick aluminum mesh

Mesh reduces internal glass

stress to safe levels (<650 PSI).

Max displacement: 30 μm

Page 12: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

The energy accumulated by a

nanobunch during a fraction of the

laser period is radiated out as a

short burst of XUV and x-ray.

Optimization of this process

(optimal incidence angle and target

density) allows a x10 increase of

intensity.

A groove-shaped target can focus

the emitted radiation.

>1 keV forward directed, <1° div.

A laser beam produces

nanobunches of electrons

irradiating a solid density target.

current

conditions

Page 13: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent
Page 14: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Above threshold ionization

(ATI) at ultrarelativistic

intensities (I >> 1018 W/cm2) is

expected to change.

Regime of interest: electrons

ionized at peak intensity.

These electrons are

accelerated forward by a plane

wave.

Electrons are ejected from the

focal spot with high energies in

the forward direction at a small

angle.

This effect has not been

measured.

Monte Carlo simulation for Ar ionization

by a 100 fs 5x1021 W/cm2 laser beam

Page 15: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Radiation reaction (still an active area of research) becomes

important with the increase of laser intensity.

The classical description breaks down, but the problem remains

tractable because

only photon emission has to be treated quantum mechanically for ultra-

relativistic electrons

the motion between two photon emissions is classical

Laser field can be treated classically (relatively small number of

laser photons absorbed in each interaction).

EPOCH code developed in UK (Univ. of Warwick) implements this

approach to account for photon emission (radiation reaction) and

pair production.

Page 16: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Laser with peak intensity 5x1022 W/cm2 irradiates an opaque target, ne = 1022 cm-3.

Electron interaction with the laser beam in the sheath field leads to g-ray production.

Page 17: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

The energy absorption by

electrons scales roughly

linearly with density.

The energy conversion by

electrons into g-rays

depends on the

transparency of the target.

Electrons move along with

the laser beam in a

transparent target,

experiencing a low field.

Using a dense opaque

target is critical for

enhancement of the g-ray

yield.

We expect for 10% of the laser energy to be converted into photons for the projected TPW intensity of 5x1022 W/cm2.

Radiation reaction is mainly classical in this regime.

Onset of QED effects is possible in this setup [Ridgers et al. PRL 2012].

Page 18: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

c0 – ratio of the electric field in the

rest frame to the Schwinger field

It controls the magnitude of pure

quantum effects.

Page 19: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Pair cascades require for the pair creation time to be much

shorter than the time of ejection from the laser focus.

Page 20: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Use two counter-propagating beams I = 8x1022 W/cm2

t = 10 fs

A 10 nm diamond foil provides energetic seed electrons.

The beams are temporally offset by t/2 to allow the foil electrons accelerate.

g spectrum

g phase-space

number of positrons

pair

cascade

Page 21: Extreme Relativistic Optics: Turning Matter Transparent

Reaching QED relevant fields requires new techniques.

TPW intensity can be enhanced to 5x1022 W/cm2, allowing

observation of the onset of QED effects

access to radiation reaction dominated plasmas

We have designs for c0 > 1 experiments using pulse splitting.

Higher fields will allow cascading and QED-dominated plasmas.

Higher intensities require new laser systems and/or plasma optics.

Increase in repetition rate will allow for increase in statistics enabling new experiments on high rep rate systems.