2. Project Title: GeJ’JErz-ciL &Ll[jrp

0

Project No.

4.Originator/Requestor: + A ~ M 5. Surnrnary of Actions

d Release of new software

0 Release of modified software:

0 Enhancements made

0 Corrections made

Name

5AQ& &WW govp rnWATAkD.?

Change of access software

0 Software Retirement

Read Onlymead-Write AdditiodChangeDelete

.p P p.

b-+ 0-

6. Validation Status

Y / Validated

~ 0 Limited Validation

~ 0 Not Validated Explain:

li

I’ CNWRA Form TOP-6 (09/01)

SOFIWARE SUMMARY FORM

14. Computer Platform

P c 18. Computer Memory Requirements: 128 m b

04. Software Date:

15. Computer Operating 16. Programming System: W I W W S Language(s1: b 4

I 4e/ m/z DDO/XP)

19. Tape Drives: 20. Disk Units: iw h4

03. Summary Action:

EJZlJ 05. Short Title: p3 - F(,5F

06. Software Title: e& -*IS (VEtCSbd b -9 08. Software Type:

0 Automated Data System

idcomputer Program

11 0 SubroutineModule

~

09. Processing Mode:

0 Interactive

0 Batch

@Combination

1 1. Submitting Organization and Address:

CNWRNSwRI 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, TX 78228

1 07. Inkgal Software ID:

10. Application Area DA a. General: &cientific/Engineering 0 Auxiliary Analyses 0 Total System PA 0 Subsystem PA 0 Other

b. Specific:

12. Technical Contact(s) and Phone: p 5 F ~ & N a N y , r N L '

11 22. Other Operational Requirements

17. Number of Source Program Statemen rv9 2 1 . Graphics:

NJI,

0 In-House ONLY 24. ocumentation Availability:

Available 0 Preliminary 0 In-House ONLY (4 Software r: Date: 1dz1P-f-

CNWRA Form TOP-4-1 (0998)

V

CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES QA VERIFICATION REPORT

FOR +ACQUZRED SOFTWARE NOT TO BE MODZFZED C

Software Titlemame: L’z - g&/s d

Version: 6 . p Demonstration workstation: pc

I NOTE: Acquired software may or may not meet all requirements and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

I Installation Testing [TOP-O18, Section 5.61

Has installation testing been conducted for each intended computer platform and operating system?

Computer Platforms: QC Operating Systerns:J f Location of Test Results:@TR

Yes: 0 N o : W N/A:D

v w Comments:. 7/&L

I Software Output [TOP-018, Section 5.5.41

Is software designed so that individual runs are uniquely identified by date, time, name of software and version?

Date and Time Displayed:

Comments:

Yes: d NO: o N/A:O /

NameNersion Displayed: -7

I NOTE: Output identification content and format is typically taken as is. ~ ~~

Medium Documentation [TOP-O18, Section 5.5.61 r The physical labeling of software medium (tapes, disks, etc.) contains: Program Name, Module/Name/Title, Module Revision, File type (ASCII, OBJ, EXE), Recording Date, and Operating System(s)?

Yes: 0 No:O N/A:O Comments:

(04/0 1 ) Page 1 of 3

CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES QA VERIFICATION REPORT

FOR +ACQUIRED SOFTWARE NOT TO BE MODIFIED C

User Documentation [TOP-01 8, Section 5.5.71

;s there a Users' Manual for the software and is it up-to-date?

User's Manual Version and Date: 6 & u) &% Zomments:

Are there basic iristructions for the installation and use of the software? Yes: El' No:O N/A:O

Location of Instructions: cu\: /&W- Comments:

Configuration Control [TOP-01 8, Section 5.7,5.9.3]

Is the Software Summary Form (Form TOP-4-1) completed and signed? Yes: d N ~ : O N/A:O

Date of Approval:

Is the list of files attached to the Software Summary Form complete and accurate? Yes: 0 No:O N/A:B

C ommen t s :

Is the source ccidt: &v,ai:sbk or, is the exec- -'e available in the case of (acquiredcommercial codes)? Yes: E?' No:O N/A:O

Location of Source Code: $?A 'Cf3 Comments :

Have all the scripdmake files and executable files been submitted to the Software Custodian?

Only the executable files are being submitted.

Location of executable files: &Sh h w Lfl Comments:

Yes: GI No:O N/A:O

(04101) Page2of 3

CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES QA VERIFICATION REPORT

FOR +ACQUIRED SOFTWARE NOT TO BE MODIFIED C

Software Release [TOP-018, Section 5.91

Upon acceptance of the software as verified above, has a Software Release Notice (SRN), Form TOP-6 been issued and does the version number of the software match the documentation?

SRN Number: 321 Comments:

Yes: Q" No:O N/A:O

~-

Software Validation [TOP-01 8, Section 5. lo]

Has a Software Validation Test Plan (SVTP) been prepared for the range of application of the software?

Version and Date of S V T P I L !)5hq

Yes:W' NO: o N/A:O IC3

Date Reviewed and Approved via QAP-002: - dP7w

Comments:

Has a Software Validation Test Report (SVTR) been prepared that documents the results of the validation cases, interpretation of the results, and determination if the software has been validated?

Version and Date of SVTR: >/- Dace Rt"l!.ewed and Approved via QAP-002: g('N Comments. :

Yes: 6 NO: o N/A: o

Additional Comments:

Software EvaluatorAJserDate Software CustodiadDate

(04/01) Page 3 of 3

SOFTWARE VALIDATION TEST PLAN AND REPORT EZ-FRISK, Version 6.1 0

Prepared by

Sarah Gonzalez

Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses San Antonio, Texas

August 2004

Approved by:

J Geology and Geophysics

CONTENTS

1 SCOPE OF VALIDATION ........................................................................................ 1 2 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ i 3 ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................... 1

3.1 Software .......................................................................................................... 1 3.2 Hardware ......................................................................................................... 1

4 PREREQUISITES .................................................................................................... 1 5 ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS .................................................................... 2 6 TEST CASES .......................................................................................................... 2

6.1 Seismic Hazard Calculation ........................................................................... 2 6.1 . 1 Objective ............................................................................................... 2 6.1.2 Test Input .............................................................................................. 2 6.1.3 Test Procedure ..................................................................................... 3 6.1.4 Test Results ........................................................................................ 13

i

W

FIGURES

Figure 1 . Site Parameters Window ................................................................................. 3 Figure 2 . Seismic Sources Window (a) ........................................................................... 4 Figure 3 . Seismic Sources Window (b) ........................................................................... 4 Figure 4 . Seismic Sources Window (c) ........................................................................... 5 Figure 5 . Attenuation Equations Window (a) .................................................................. 6 Figure 6 . Attenuation Equations Window (b) .................................................................. 7 Figure 7 . Calculation Parameters Window ..................................................................... 8 Figure 8 . Execute Window ............................................................................................. 9 Figure 9 . EZ-FRISK Output .......................................................................................... 10 Figure 10 . Plot Options Window ................................................................................... 10 Figure 11 . Results for Period = PGA ............................................................................ 11 Figure 12 . Results for Period = 0.2 Seconds ................................................................ 12 Figure 13 . Results for Period = 1 Second ..................................................................... 13 Figure 14 . Ground Motion Values from the CGS Website ............................................ 14 Figure 15 . Ground Motion Values from the USGS Website .......................................... 15

TABLES

Table 1 . Comparison of Probabilistic Ground Motion Values for an Annual

Table 2 . Comparison of Probabilistic Ground Motion Values for an Annual Frequency of Exceedance of 0.0021 .............................................................. 15

Frequency of Exceedance of 0.00040 ............................................................ 15

ii

1 SCOPE OF VALIDATION

The software EZ-FRISK Version 6.1 0 was developed by Risk Engineering, Inc. EZ-FRISK calculates the probabilistic earthquake hazard at a site based on user-defined inputs. The user must specify the location and characteristics of seismic sources in the region and select one or more ground motion attenuation models applicable to the region. Seismic sources and attenuation models can either be selected from the EZ-FRISK database or defined by the user. The results of the program’s probabilistic calculations are annual frequencies of exceedance of various ground motion levels at the site of interest.

The seismic hazard for a firm rock site in San Diego will be calculated in EZ-FRISK. This calculation will require the input of the relevant seismic sources and attenuation models from the EZ-FRISK database. The results will then be compared to those obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the California Geological Survey (CGS) websites for the same location. In performing the above calculation, the full capabilities of EZ-FRISK will be tested.

2 REFERENCES

1) Bender, B. and D. Perkins. “SEISRISK Ill: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation”. US Geological Survey BULLETIN 1772. 1987.

2) Ca I ifor n ia G eo I og i ca I S u rve y ( h tt p://ca mw. consrv. ca . caov/s h m p/) . 3) Risk Engineering, Inc. EZ-FRISK. Version 6.1. Golden, Colorado. 2003. 4) U.S. Geological Survey hazard mapping website (http://eqhazmaps.uscas.nov/).

3 ENVIRONMENT

3.1 Software

EZ-FRISK was built to operate within the MS WindowsTM (98/NT/2000/XP) family of operating systems

3.2 Hardware

The following is a list of minimum requirements needed to run the application:

PC with Pentium processor (or compatible) 64 MB of memory (1 28 MB recommended) 300 MB of free disk space

0 A VGA monitor is required (a SVGA monitor is recommended) An available internet connection

4 PREREQUISITES

Not applicable .

1

5 ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS

Assumptions of this validation are presented in Section 6.1.4.

6 TESTCASES

6.1 Seismic Hazard Calculation

6.1 .I Objective

Demonstrate that EZ-FRISK can correctly calculate the seismic hazard at a specified site.

6.1.2 Test Input

A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for San Diego (latitude 32.71 2", longitude -1 17.16") will be calculated in EZ-FRISK assuming a firm rock site. For this validation, a shear wave velocity of 1000 m/s will be used. In addition, all seismic sources and attenuation equations will be selected from the EZ-FRISK database. The results from this calculation will then be compared to those obtained from both the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and California Geological Survey (CGS) hazard mapping websites for the same location.

2