factor ag stauffacherstrasse 45 ch-8004 zürich switzerland phone: +41 44 298 28 00 fax: +41 44...

Factor AG Stauffacherstrasse 45 CH-8004 Zürich SwitzerlandPhone: +41 44 298 28 00 Fax: +41 44 298 28 99 [email protected]

Carbon Services (Private) Limted Al-Maalik 19 Davis Road Lahore Pakistan Phone +9242-6313235 & 36 Fax +9242-6312959 www.carbon.com.pk

Factor AG & Carbon Services:

CDM Projects in the Cement Sector

•Lahore

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.carbon.com.pk/

CDM Projects in the Cement Sector Factor AG & Carbon Services

Contents

1. Factor Company Profile

2. CDM Projects in the Cement Industry

3. Factor Track Record

4. Factor Track Record in Cement


Factor AG We advise on emissions trading – since 1999

Carbon Financing

Carbon Asset Development

Carbon Risk Management


Factor Consulting + Management


Factor Team

• Over 100 full time CDM and Carbon Finance Experts at Factor AG

• Operations include

- Headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland

- Subsidaries and Partner offices in:

- China

- India

- Brazil

- Romania

- Pakistan

- Germany

- USA

- Chile

- Russia


Track Record in a Nutshell (as of June 2007)

Carbon Financing

• Executed transactions from initial offering to final contract

• Transacted with the most credible Buyers in the market

• Over 15 Mt CO2 transacted since 2004 with a market value exceeding € 100 million

Carbon Asset Development

• Over 20 registered CDM Projects

• Over 20 more at validation

• Over 60 projects under development

• Total pipeline exceeding 20 Mt CO2 to 2012


We do business with leading global firms...


Contents



3. Track Record

4. Track Record in Cement


Approved Methodologies for Cement Projects

Methodology Number

Description Number of registered Projects

ACM5 (ver 3) Increasing the blend in cement production 36

AM33 (ver 2) Use of non-carbonated calcium sources in the raw mix for cement processing

6

AM40 (ver 1.1) Use of alternative raw materials that contain carbonates in clinker manufacturing in cement kilns

1

ACM15 (consolidating AM33 and AM40)

Alternative raw materials that do not contain carbonates for clinker manufacturing in cement kilns

0

ACM3 (ver 7) Emission reduction through partial substitution of fossil fuels with alternative fuels in cement manufacture

16

AM24 (ver 2) Baseline methodology for greenhouse gas reductions through waste heat recovery and utilization for power generation at cement plants

11


ACM0005 - Increasing the Blend in Cement Production

• Applicable for projects, that increase the share of additives (i.e. reduce the share of clinker beyond current practices in the country)

• Additives are defined as materials blended with clinker to produce blended cement types and include fly ash, gypsum, slag, etc.

• Applicable under the following conditions

- There is no shortage of additives related to the lack of blending materials. Project

- Participants should demonstrate that there is no alternative allocation or use for the additional amount of additives used in the project activity. If the surplus availability of additives is not substantiated the project emissions reductions (ERs) will be discounted.

- This methodology is applicable to domestically sold output of the project activity plant and excludes export of blended cement.

- Adequate data are available on cement types in the market.


ACM0015 - Using alternative raw materials in cement kilns

Applicable to

- project activities that use alternative raw materials that do not contain carbonates (AMC) in cement kilns for the production of clinker. The AMC partially or fully substitutes raw materials that contain calcium and/or magnesium carbonates (e.g. limestone).

- existing as well as to greenfield plants

Under the following additional conditions:

- Use of alternative materials shall increase neither the capacity of clinker production nor the lifetime of equipment

- Type and quality of produced clinker remain the same

- Alternative raw materials have never been used in the clinker manufacturing facility prior to the implementation of the project activity;

- There is sufficient historical information about the clinker manufacturing facility, the raw materials used, and energy performance of the kiln.

Is not applicable for the following activities:

- Energy efficiency initiatives for improvements in process equipment (up-grade towers, grinding separators, burners, expert control systems, etc.);

- Fuel switching. See ACM0015 for more details.


ACM0003 - Partial substitution of fossil fuels with alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fuels in cement manufacture

Applicable to

• activities in the cement industry where fossil fuel(s) used in an existing clinker production facility are partially replaced by one or more carbon intensive fossil fuel(s) and/or alternative fuels.

The following conditions shall apply

- A significant investment is required to enable the use of the alternative fuel(s) and/or the less carbon intensive fossil fuel(s);

- During the last three years prior to the start of the project activity, no alternative fuels have been used in the project plant;

- The CO2 emissions reduction relates to CO2 emissions generated from fuel combustion only and is unrelated to the CO2 emissions from decarbonisation of raw materials (i.e. CaCO3 and MgCO3 bearing minerals);

- The methodology is applicable only for installed capacity (expressed in tons clinker/year) that exists by the time of validation of the project activity.

- In case of project activities using biomass residues, renewable biomass or biomass from dedicated plantations, additional applicability conditions apply


AM0024 - Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization for Power Generation at cement plants

Applicable to project activities that use waste heat gas generated in clinker making process (i.e. in the cement kilns) to produce electricity.

Applicable under the following conditions

- The electricity produced is used within the cement works where the proposed project activity is located and excess electricity is supplied to the grid; no electricity export to the grid in the baseline scenario (in case of existing captive power plant);

- Electricity generated under the project activity displaces either grid electricity or from an identified specific generation source. Identified specific generation source could be either an existing captive power generation source or new generation source;

- The grid or identified specific generation source option is clearly identifiable;

- Waste heat is only to be used in the project activity, etc.

NOT applicable to project activities

- Where the current use of waste heat or the identified alternative business as usual use of waste heat is

- located outside of the clinker making process

- that affect process emissions from cement plants.


Contents






Factor Track Record:CDM ProjectsInstru- Function Volume Vintages Host Country Project Type

ment t CO2e

Global MandatesCER Broker 300'000 2005-11 India Biomass energyCER Broker 61'000 2005-12 India Biomass energyVER Broker 500 2004-13 Costa Rica Biomass energyCER Broker 960'000 2008-12 Costa Rica Landfill gasCER Broker 5'000 2005-11 India Solar energyCER Broker 1'900'000 2005-12 Brasil Landfill gasCER Broker 1'300'000 2005-12 Brasil Landfill gasCER Broker 1'300'000 2006-12 Brasil Landfill gasCER Broker 162'000 2004-12 India HydroCER Broker 105'000 2004-12 India HydroCER Broker 200'000 2005-12 India HydroCER Broker 120'000 2005-12 India HydroCER Broker 840'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 90'000 2005-12 India Biomass energyCER Broker 50'000 2006-12 India HydroCER Broker 210'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 21'000 2008-12 India HydroCER Broker 150'000 2008-12 India HydroCER Broker 180'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 210'000 2007-12 India Biomass energyCER Broker 810'000 2006-12 India BiodieselCER Broker 360'000 2007-12 India Energy efficiencyCER Broker 189'000 2007-12 India BiodieselCER Broker 90'000 2007-12 India Energy efficiency


Factor Track Record:CDM Projects

Instru- Function Volume

ment t CO2e

Global Mandates

CER Broker 90'000 2007-12 India Energy efficiencyCER Broker 300'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 300'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 84'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 315'000 2008-12 India Energy efficiencyCER Broker 105'000 2008-12 India Fuel switchCER Broker 270'000 2008-12 India HydroCER Broker 840'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 350'000 2006-12 India HydroCER Broker 450'000 2006-12 India HydroCER Broker 1'015'000 2007-12 India HydroCER Broker 560'000 2007-12 India Biomass energyCER Broker 280'000 2009-12 India Biomass energyCER Broker 280'000 2008-12 India Biomass energyCER Broker 105'000 2008-12 India HydroCER Broker 140'000 2009-12 India HydroCER Broker 0 2006-12 India Fuel switchCER Broker 315'000 2009-12 India HydroCER Broker 525'000 2009-12 India HydroCER Broker 400'000 2008-12 Mali Fuel switchCER PDD 92'000 2007-12 Switzerland Biomass energyCER Broker 150'000 2007-12 China HydroCER Broker 400'000 2008-12 China HydroCER Broker 120'000 2007-12 Brazil Fuel switchCER Broker 50'000 2008-12 Indonesia Energy efficiencyVER Broker 50'000 2007-12 Indonesia Landfill gasCER Broker 300'000 2008-12 Argentina Biomass energyCER PIN 20'000 2007-2012 Nepal Solar energy

Instru- Function Volume Vintages Host Country Project Type

ment t CO2e

Global Mandates


Factor Track Record:CDM Projects

Mandates in Zone West

Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,

(Croatia)AIJ PM, Broker 139'000 2008-12 Romania Fuel Switch, En.eff.ERU PDD 60'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 150'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 500'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 200'000 2008-12 Romania Biomass energyERU Broker 5'000'000 2008-12 Romania N2OERU PIN 300'000 2008-12 Estonia Methane recoveryERU PIN 200'000 2008-12 Estonia Biomass energyERU PDD 1'000'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Biofuel, transportationERU PDD 175'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Biofuel, energy efficiencyERU Broker 600'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Landfill gasERU PIN 200'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Methane recoveryERU PDD 650'000 2008-12 Czech Republic Dist. Heating, GeothermAIJ * PM, PDD 238'000 - Czech Republic Fuel Switch, En.eff.AIJ PM, PDD 247'000 2008-12 Slovak Republic Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 40'000 2008-12 Poland Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 140'000 2008-12 Poland Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 145'000 2008-12 Lithuania Energy efficiency

Mandates in Zone North-East

Russia, Ukraine, Belarus (Kazakhstan)

Mandates in Zone South-East

Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kyrgyz Republic, FYR Macedonia, Moldova, Turkmenistan,

Uzbekistan, (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Tajikistan)

51'118'500

AIJ* AIJ Simulation


Factor Track Record: CDM ProjectsMandates in Zone West


(Croatia)AIJ PM, Broker 139'000 2008-12 Romania Fuel Switch, En.eff.ERU PDD 60'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 150'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 500'000 2008-12 Romania Energy efficiencyERU Broker 200'000 2008-12 Romania Biomass energyERU Broker 5'000'000 2008-12 Romania N2OERU PIN 300'000 2008-12 Estonia Methane recoveryERU PIN 200'000 2008-12 Estonia Biomass energyERU PDD 1'000'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Biofuel, transportationERU PDD 175'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Biofuel, energy efficiencyERU Broker 600'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Landfill gasERU PIN 200'000 2008-12 Bulgaria Methane recoveryERU PDD 650'000 2008-12 Czech Republic Dist. Heating, GeothermAIJ * PM, PDD 238'000 - Czech Republic Fuel Switch, En.eff.AIJ PM, PDD 247'000 2008-12 Slovak Republic Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 40'000 2008-12 Poland Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 140'000 2008-12 Poland Energy efficiencyAIJ Review 145'000 2008-12 Lithuania Energy efficiency






51'118'500

AIJ* AIJ Simulation


Factor Track Record: CDM Projects



(Croatia)


Russia, Ukraine, Belarus (Kazakhstan)AIJ PIN 1'380'000 2004-12 Russia Methane recoveryERU PIN 1'800'000 2008-12 Russia Methane recoveryERU PIN 2'700'000 2008-12 Russia Methane recoveryERU PIN 600'000 2008-12 Russia FlaringERU PIN 2'800'000 2008-12 Russia FlaringERU PIN 780'000 2008-12 Russia Industrial energy efficiencyERU PIN 465'000 2008-12 Russia Dist. Heating, fuel switchERU Broker 280'000 2008-12 Russia Energy efficiencyERU Broker 960'000 2008-12 Russia Gas captureERU PIN 2'200'000 2008-12 Ukraine Gas captureERU PIN 990'000 2008-12 Ukraine Power, energy efficiencyERU PIN 590'000 2008-12 Ukraine Gas captureERU PIN 620'000 2008-12 Ukraine Wind energyERU PIN 200'000 2008-12 Ukraine Industrial energy efficiencyAIJ PIN 500'000 2004-12 Belarus Energy efficiencyERU PDD 350'000 2008-12 Kazakhstan Hydro powerERU PDD 50'000 2008-12 Kazakhstan Solar energy




51'118'500

AIJ* AIJ Simulation


Factor Track Record: CDM Projects



(Croatia)





Uzbekistan, (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Tajikistan)CER Broker 500'000 2006-12 Tajikistan HydroCER Broker 350'000 2005-12 Tajikistan HydroCER Broker 0 2007-12 Moldova BioEthanolCER PDD 1'000'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan HydroCER PIN 1'800'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Power, energy efficiencyCER PIN 120'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Heating, energy efficiencyCER PIN 900'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Hydro powerCER PIN 500'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Lightning efficiencyCER PIN 500'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Transportation, fuel switchCER PIN 350'000 2006-2012 Uzbekistan Dist.Heating, energy efficiencyCER PIN 20'000 2005- 2012 Kyrgyz Republic Energy efficiencyCER PIN 100'000 2006-2012 Kyrgyz Republic HousingCER PIN 300'000 2006-2012 Kyrgyz Republic Biomass energy

51'118'500

AIJ* AIJ Simulation


Contents






Factor Track Record in Cement (cont.):CDM Projects

• China: Developed 3 CDM projects for power generation from kiln waste heat, and purchased the resulting carbon credits (ongoing).

• My Home Cement, India: Developed CDM-PDD for fly ash blending project and supported sale of carbon credits (ongoing).

• Wietersdorfer + Peggauer Cement, 2003 (Austria): Prepare comprehensive strategy on CO2 emissions trading in Europe, including: Analysis of impacts of EU ETS on Austrian and European cement and lime markets; evaluation of a planned capacity expansion project; establishment of CO2 abatement cost curve; recommendations for policy lobbying.

• Holcim, 2003: Study on CO2 emissions associated with global freight transport of clinker and cement.

• Holcim, 2003: Study GHG emissions intensity of different building materials, taking into account differences in amount of material required per construction unit.

• Holcim: Supported PDD development for projects in Costa Rica, Indonesia



• Japan Cement Association: In the context of the Asia Pacific Partnership for Climate Protection (AP6), Factor supported the Japan Cement Association in developing a protocol for the calculation of CO2 emissions in the cement industry. The Protocol will be used by cement companies in all AP6 countries for inventorying their CO2 emissions.

• Confidential Client: Supported identification and selection of CDM projects in cement plants in South- and Southeast Asia (India, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam).

• Confidential Client: Supported the revision of a baseline methodology and project design document (PDD) for a proposed CDM project in Central America.

• GTZ, India: Developing CDM methodology for cement sector in India based on benchmarking principle. In cooperation with Indian Cement Manufacturing Association (CMA) and National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCB) (ongoing).



• Cembureau: Supported comprehensive CO2 benchmarking exercise for all cement plants in Europe (ongoing).

• Cembureau, Heidelberg Cement, Holcim, Italcementi, Lafarge (2002): Evaluation of mechanisms for allocation of CO2 emissions allowances in the EU emissions trading scheme. Quantitative analysis of allowance mechanisms with respect to impacts on European cement markets.

• WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), 2000-01: Cement CO2 Protocol. Factor AG was responsible for developing the CO2 Protocol guidance document and Excel-based calculation tool in accordance with the decisions taken by the CSI group. The Protocol is available at www.ghgprotocol.org.

• Confidential Client: Benchmarking of 700 cement companies worldwide with respect to emissions of local air pollutants, using publicly available data.

http://www.ghgprotocol.org/



• WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI): Revision of Cement CO2 Protocol. In the CSI, a group of 15 leading cement companies cooperate on global sustainability issues including climate change. The CSI group comprises, among others, the following companies: Cemex, HeidelbergCement, Holcim, Italcementi, Lafarge, RMC, and Secil. Factor AG is mandated to provide support in revising the Cement CO2 Protocol. The Protocol comprises a monitoring and reporting standard and an Excel-based calculation tool for CO2 emissions in the cement industry. The Protocol has become part of the Corporate GHG Protocol developed by the WBCSD and the World Resources Institute.

• German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), 2004-05: We have conducted a series of awareness building workshops on climate change and the CDM project development for the cement, pulp and paper, and power sectors and provided in-depth training for the largest petrochemical company in India. Through this mandate, we provide continued support to several cement companies in preparing CDM project documentation.



• CDM Executive Board & Methodologies Panel of the UNFCCC, 2004-06: Reviewed the baseline methodologies of the following CDM projects in the cement industry:- Birla project for increased blending, India- Lafarge project for increased use of biomass fuels, Malaysia- Indocement project for increased blending, Indonesia- Indocement project for increased use of alternative fuels, Indonesia- Taishan project for power generation from waste heat, China– Grasim methodology for energy efficiency improvement in cement plants


Factor Track Record in Cement (cont.):CDM Methodologies

• India:

- Developing new CDM methodology for cement based on benchmarking (ongoing)

- In cooperation with Cement Manufacturer’s Association (CMA) and National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCB)

• Holcim:

- Supported CDM methodology for new cement kilns

• CDM Executive Board / UNFCCC:

- Reviewed various cement-related methodology submissions for the CDM-EB


Factor Track Record in Cement (cont.):Corporate Strategies

• WBCSD / CSI Cement CO2 Monitoring and Reporting Protocol

- CSI is a group of 15 leading cement companies (Holcim, Lafarge, Cemex, Heidelberger, Italcementi, Secil, etc.)

- Factor supported the development of the CO2 monitoring and reporting protocol for the CSI (2001 / 2004)

- This protocol is today the widest-used protocol in the cement industry globally

• Cembureau:

- Factor is supporting a CO2 benchmarking exercise covering all cement plants in Europe (ongoing)

• Asia-Pacific Partnership for Climate (AP6):

- For Japan Cement Association, Factor supported development of a protocol to be used for CO2 benchmarking among AP6 members


Contact Details

Factor Consulting + Management AG Stauffacherstrasse 45 CH-8004 Zurich Switzerland

Phone +41 44 298 28 00 Fax +41 44 298 28 99 www.factorglobal.com

Carbon Services (Private) Limted Al-Maalik 19 Davis Road Lahore Pakistan

Phone +9242-6313235 & 36 Fax +9242-6312959 www.carbon.com.pk

http://www.factorglobal.com/













THANK YOU

factor ag stauffacherstrasse 45 ch-8004 zürich switzerland phone: +41 44 298 28 00 fax: +41 44...

Documents

cement slide

cement kilns

cement industry

cement manufacture

cement plants

cement processing

cement sector lahore

factor ag operations