factors influencing implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control practices in...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and
Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study
CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry Subgroup
María E. Fernández, Ph.DAssociate Professor of Health Promotion and Behavioral
ScienceUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
School of Public Health
![Page 2: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• Research Question
• Methods
- Data collection
- Analysis approach
• Preliminary results
• Timeline
![Page 3: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Questions
• Primary question: What factors influence the implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control practices in FQHCs?
• Secondary question: How useful is the CFIR in assisting the analysis and interpretation of qualitative empirical data on implementation?
![Page 4: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methods
Used qualitative inquiry approaches (in-depth personal interviews and focus groups) to understand factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control programs and practices in FQHCs.
![Page 5: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Instruments
• Focus group and in-depth interview guides were developed broadly informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
• A modified Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach was used to guide the discussions
• Open-ended questions and prompts about successful practice changes were included as well as questions that tap into a specific evidence-based cancer control practices (including tobacco cessation)
• A brief survey asking about FQHC size, patient population, EHR integration and participation in the Health Disparity Collaboratives was administered.
![Page 6: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Focus Group Guide Overview
Part I: Example of successful practice changes
Part II: Explore evidence-based cancer prevention and control strategy (Tobacco Cessation: Ask-Advise-Refer)
Part III: Inner setting—organizational characteristics and implementation climate and readiness for implementation
Part IV: Other domains of CFIR—intervention characteristics and outer settings
![Page 7: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sampling & Recruitment
• Sample: CEOs, CMOs (or Medical Directors), COOs (or Operation Managers), Quality Improvement managers, frontline project managers, etc. of FQHCs
• Recruited through partnerships with:
![Page 8: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Data Collection
• Conducted focus groups and interviews at:o National conferences attended by FQHC leaders and staffs in
San Diego, California; Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Washington, D.C.
o Regional Primary Care Association (PCA) meetings in Denver, Colorado; Columbia, South Carolina; and Pine Mountain, Georgia.
• Five focus groups and 21 in-depth personal interviews; all were digitally recorded
• Data collection period: August, 2011—April, 2012
![Page 9: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Data Analysis
![Page 10: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Grounded Thematic Analytic Strategy
CFIR-
based
Coding
• Segment data into “meaning units”• Code all data using pre-existing codes developed based on the CFIR• Calculate frequency distribution of coded quotations
Data-
driven
Coding
• Identify barriers and facilitators to implementation based on respondents’ descriptions of successful and unsuccessful efforts at implementation
Themati
c Analysi
s
• Barriers and facilitators will be conceptually clustered to identify a small set of sub-themes
• Sub-themes will be clustered again to identify a smaller set of themes that comprise the main factors that influence implementation
![Page 11: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Phase 1: CFIR-based Coding
• A list of pre- existing codes was developed based on the CFIR domains and constructs
• Each transcript is coded by a research team member using pre-existing codes and reviewed by another, followed by group reviews
• Additional codes were added as needed for responses that do not fit with the CFIR
![Page 12: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Phase 1 (cont.): Frequency Distribution
• Frequencies of coded quotations among each CFIR domain and subdomains were calculated and organized by the three groups of respondents:
• CEOs or COOs (executives)
• CMOs or Medical Directors (medical managers)
• All others (other staff)
![Page 13: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Phase 2: Data-driven Coding
• Phase 2 has three separate but inter-related activities that proceed in an iterative fashion
Identify barriers and facilitators to implementation that most accurately reflect the experience of the respondents (i.e. data-driven) without regard to the meaning and content of the CFIR
Naming barriers and facilitators at second level of abstraction from the data
Renaming and merging codes as they emerge
![Page 14: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Phase 3: Thematic Analysis
• Clustering codes into a two-dimensional model for initial data reduction
• Further data reduction and exploration within and between each cell of the matrix
![Page 15: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
A Two-dimension Model for Initial Data Reduction
Functional areas
Actionable levels within the health centers
Individual Level Group Level
Organizational Level
Patients Personnel
Role of data
Dynamics of change
Effective leadership
Management of people and tasks
![Page 16: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Phase 3: Further Data Reduction and Exploration
• Group themes and subthemes into a smaller number of categories
• Explore possible linkages among themes and subthemes
• Identify themes/subthemes that are most salient to each respondent group and compare them
• Compare identified themes (emergent from the data) with CFIR constructs
![Page 17: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Current Progress
• We are currently engaged in Phase 3
• Finished coding 522 quotations (in Inner Setting and Individual Characteristics)
• Came up with 147 barriers and facilitators
![Page 18: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Preliminary Results
![Page 19: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Participants’ Roles
• 59 individuals (29 male & 30 female)
29 Chief Medical Officers (CMO) or Medical Directors
4 Chief Executive Officers (CEO) & 1 Executive vice president
9 Chief Operations Officers (COO)or Operations Manager
4 Quality managers (in different titles)
3 Director of nursing and 1 nursing supervisor
Others include nurse practitioner, physician’s assistants, director of health services, project managers, grant manager and medical interpreter
![Page 20: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Participants’ Locations
• Participants represent FQHCs in 14 states and Washington, D.C.
![Page 21: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Coded Quotations
• A total of 1, 213 coded quotations (meaning units)• 740 of them were coded to more than one CFIR code
46%
22%
10%
11%
11%
Distribution of Quotations among CFIR Domain
Inner Setting
Process
Individual Character-istics
Outer Setting
Intervention Charac-teristics
22%
45%
33%
Distribution of Quotations among Respondents
Executives
Medical Managers
Other staff
![Page 22: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Examples of Data-driven Barriers and Facilitators
Barriers• Disinterest in prevention activities
• Lack of resources to implement change
• Staff lack of time to integrate change
• Patients resistant to change
• Limited functions of EMR
• Lack of staff follow through with patients
Facilitators• Change aligned with organization
mission and values
• Action and change oriented staff
• Designated Quality Improvement (QI) personnel
• Obtaining buy-in through feedback and recognition
• “Pilot team” to test new changes (low risk and important information)
![Page 23: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Preliminary Highlights
• The use of EMRs is pivotal in cancer prevention practices and other quality improvement efforts in CHCs
• Federal regulations and requirements (UDS & PCMH) and national visionary goals (Meaningful Use incentives) drive changes
• Leadership engagement is essential for practice change
• Connections and partnerships with academics and other healthcare organizations are very important for CHCs’ cancer prevention efforts
• Providing sufficient training and resources for staff to implement change is very important
• Programs aligning with the goal of improving quality of care are more likely to be implemented
![Page 24: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Significance
Findings will contribute to the understanding of the factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control programs in FQHCs serving disadvantaged populations and inform the design of interventions to increase the use of EBAs in FQHCs.
![Page 25: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Proposed Timeline for Manuscript
• Receive feedback on analysis (Oct,2012)
• Complete analysis (Nov, 2012)
• Manuscript outline (Nov, 2012)
• Writing (Nov—Dec, 2012)
• Manuscript review and feedback (Jan, 2012)
• CDC approval (Jan 2012)
• Submission (Feb, 2012)
![Page 26: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Acknowledgement — QIS Members
• UT Houston: Maria Fernandez (PI), Nick Woolf (Consultant), Lily Liang, Glenna Dawson, William Calo, Jenny Tektiridis, Barbara Kimmel, Glorili Alejandro, Patricia Mullen
• Emory University : Michelle Kegler (PI), Michelle Carvalho, Gillian Schauer
• University of South Carolina (SC): Vicki Young (Co-I), Dayna Campbell
• University of Colorado (UC): Betsy Risendal (PI), Andrea Dwyer, Yvonne Kellar-Guenther
• University of Washington (UW): Shin-Ping Tu (Co-I)
• National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC): Michelle Proser
• National Center for Farmworker Health: Alicia Gonzales
![Page 27: Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649da65503460f94a91090/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Questions?
Thank You!