faculty climate survey college of merchandising, hospitality and tourism 2012-13

Faculty Climate SurveyCollege of Merchandising,

Hospitality and Tourism

2012-13

Task Force Members• Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design

• Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair

• Tracy Everbach, Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School of Journalism

• Francisco Guzman, College of Business

• Warren Henry, College of Music

• Kuruvilla John, College of Engineering

• Linda Marshall, College of Arts & Sciences

• Mariela Nunez-Janes, College of Public Affairs and Community Service

• Mike Sayler, College of Education

• Sanjukta Pookulangara, College of Merchandising, Hospitality, and Tourism

• Mark Vosvick, Faculty Senate

• Angela Wilson, College of Arts & Sciences

• Jerry Wircenski, College of Information

• The Survey Research Institute at Cornell University was contracted to administer the online survey.

• Survey was open between November 8, 2012 - January 25, 2013.

• Initial email invitation and three reminders were sent to participants.

• Incentives were offered to full-time faculty members in departments achieving 80% response rate.

Methodology

• For departments achieving an 80% response rate by December 14th, the names of full-time faculty were entered into a drawing to win $250.00 to apply toward faculty travel or other professional development activities.

• A total of 700 participants completed the survey out of 1059 with valid email addresses, achieving a 66.10% response rate. A response rate of 83.33% was achieved by the College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism.

• Differences between UNT and the College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism were determined through independent t-tests.

Methodology

5

• Hiring• Teaching • Research• Service • Merit• Promotion• Workload

• Resources• Mentoring• Work/Family Balance• Diversity• Satisfaction• Climate

Survey Instrument

2012-13 Climate Survey, College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

6

Response Rate by College

CPAC8% n = 59

CMHT4% n = 26

CVAD6% n = 45

CAS43% n = 324

COB9% n = 69

COE10% n = 76

COM9% n = 67

CENG6% n = 48

COI3% n = 26

SOJ2% n = 15

Response Rate by College

CPACCMHTCVADCASCOBCOECOMCENGCOISOJ

Other = 0.6 % n = 5; represents Graduate School and Undergradu-ate Studies


7

How satisfied were you with the following hiring factors? (Mean)

Survey Items UNT

CMHT

Faculty efforts to meet and recruit you to UNT 3.34 3.68**

The overall hiring process

3.22

3.46*

The quality of information about responsibilities associated with the position

3.15

3.48*

Your initial salary

2.73 2.88

Your start-up package

2.67 2.64

Negotiations about your salary and start-up package

2.65 2.43

Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

Hiring


8

How satisfied were you with the following hiring factors?(Frequency Distribution)

Survey Items Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied CMHT N/%

Faculty efforts to meet and recruit you to UNT

00.0%

00.0%

832.0%

1768.0%

25100%

The overall hiring process

00.0%

00.0%

1453.8%

1246.2%

26100%

The quality of information about responsibilities associated with the position

00.0%

00.0%

1352.0%

1248.0%

25100%

Your initial salary

00.0%

624.0%

1664.0%

312.0%

25100%

Your start-up package

17.1%

428.6%

857.1%

17.1%

14100%

Negotiations about your salary and start-up package

214.3%

535.7%

642.9%

17.1%

14100%

Hiring


9

Hiring in my department… UNT CMHT

is conducted fairly

3.19 3.33

includes a conscious effort to generate a diverse pool of applicants

3.05 3.48

has established and clearly communicated criteria 3.19 3.52*

is consistent for all applicants for a position 3.12 3.42*

Range: (1=Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) * significant at .05 level

Hiring Please rate your level of agreement about how faculty hiring is done in your department. (Mean)


10

Please rate your level of agreement about how faculty hiring is done in your department. (Frequency Distribution)

Survey Items Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree CMHT N/%

is conducted fairly 0 0.0%

2 8.3%

12 50.0%

10 41.7%

24 100%

Includes a conscious effort to generate a diverse pool of applicants

0 0.0%

3 13.0%

6 26.1%

14 60.9%

23 100%

Has established and clearly communicated criteria

0 0.0%

1 4.0%

10 40.0%

14 56.0%

25 100%

Is consistent for all applicants for a position

0 0.0%

2 8.3%

10 41.7%

12 50.0%

24 100%

Hiring


11

ITEM UNT CMHT My colleagues and I have informal conversations about teaching. 3.40 3.69*

Development and improvement in teaching skills is valued. 3.04 3.76**

Classes are assigned fairly. 3.08 3.46*

Teaching load is fair. 3.08 3.23

Work with faculty-led study abroad programs is valued. 2.83 3.70**

Community-based learning projects are valued. 2.71 3.33**

Mentoring undergraduate students is valued. 2.89 3.42**

Mentoring graduate students is valued. 3.24 3.68**

Mentoring underrepresented students is valued. 2.87 3.45**

I spend more time talking to and informally mentoring students than do others in my department.

2.87 2.89

Undergraduate students treat me appropriately. 3.31 3.42

Graduate students treat me appropriately. 3.41 3.68* Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

Teaching Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements about teaching in your department.(Mean)


12

ITEM Strongly disagree

Disagree Agree Strongly agree

CMHT N/%

My colleagues and I have informal conversations about teaching. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

8 30.8%

18 69.2%

26 100%

Development and improvement in teaching skills is valued. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

6 24.0%

19 76.0%

25 100%

Classes are assigned fairly. 0 0.0%

2 7.7%

10 38.5%

14 53.8%

26 100%

Teaching load is fair. 1 3.8%

2 7.7%

13 50.0%

10 38.5%

26 100%

Work with faculty-led study abroad programs is valued. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

7 30.4%

16 69.6%

23 100%

Community-based learning projects are valued. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

14 66.7%

7 33.3%

21 100%

Mentoring undergraduate students is valued. 0 0.0%

2 7.7%

11 42.3%

13 50.0%

26 100%

Mentoring graduate students is valued. 0 0.0%

1 4.0%

6 24.0%

18 72.0%

25 100%

Mentoring underrepresented students is valued. 0 0.0%

2 9.1%

8 36.4%

12 54.5%

22 100%

I spend more time talking to and informally mentoring students than do others in my department.

1 5.3%

4 21.1%

10 52.6%

4 21.1%

19 100%

Undergraduate students treat me appropriately. 0 0.0%

1 3.8%

13 50.0%

12 46.2%

26 100%

Graduate students treat me appropriately. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

7 31.6%

15 68.2%

22 100%

Teaching Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements about teaching in your department.(Frequency Distribution)


ResearchThink about the value of your own creativity/scholarship/research in your department. In comparison to your colleagues: How much does your department value your scholarship/research? (Mean)

UNT CMHT1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

3.29 3.36

Range: (1 = Undervalued; 5 = Very highly valued)Und

erva

lued

----

----

----

----

----

--V

ery

Hig

hly

Val

ued

ResearchThink about the value of your own creativity/scholarship/research in your department. In comparison to your colleagues: How much does your department value your scholarship/research? (Frequency Distribution)

Undervalued Somewhat undervalued

Valued equally

Somewhat valued

Very highly valued

CMHTN/%

0

0.0%

5

35.7%

3

21.4%

2

14.3%

4

28.6%

14

100%

15

ITEM UNT CMHT

Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is valued in my department.

2.92 3.43*

Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is rewarded in my department.

2.65 3.14*

UNT provides the needed infrastructure for interdisciplinary work.

2.39 2.42

I sometimes collaborate with members of my department.

3.04 3.64**

My collaborations with people outside my department of the university are usually better than collaborations with department colleagues.

2.74 2.25

When people in the department are working on something related to my expertise, they ask for my input.

2.74 3.21*

I find my research collaborations rewarding. 3.31 3.46

Range: ( 1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

Research How much do you agree with each of these statements? (Mean)


16

ITEM Strongly disagree

Disagree Agree Strongly agree

CMHT N/%

Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is valued in my department.

0 0.0%

1 7.1%

6 42.9%

7 50.0%

14 100%

Interdisciplinary creatively/scholarship/research is rewarded in my department.

0 0.0%

2 14.3%

8 57.1%

4 28.6%

14 100%

UNT provides the needed infrastructure for interdisciplinary work.

1 8.3%

5 41.7%

6 50.0%

0 0.0%

12 100%

I sometimes collaborate with members of my department.

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

5 35.7%

9 64.3%

14 100%

My collaborations with people outside my department of the university are usually better than collaborations with department colleagues.

2 16.7%

6 50.0%

3 25.0%

1 8.3%

12 100%

When people in the department are working on something related to my expertise, they ask for my input.

0 0.0%

3 21.4%

5 35.7%

6 42.9%

14 100%

I find my research collaborations rewarding. 0 0.0%

0 0.0%

7 53.8%

6 46.2%

13 100%

Research How much do you agree with each of these statements? (Frequency Distribution)


17

Service In my department, committee assignments are made fairly.(Mean)

CMHT

UNT

1 2 3 4 5

4.08**

3.49

Mean

Range: (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level


18

Service In my department, committee assignments are made fairly. (Frequency Distribution)

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neither Agree or disagree

Agree Strongly agree

CMHTN/%

1

3.8%

0

0.0%

3

11.5%

14

53.8%

8

30.8%

26

100%


19

ServiceThink about all of the service activities you actually do (100% of your service), including formal and recognized activities as well as informal activities. How much of your service is… (Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

Not talked about/kept from my colleagues 3.50 1.62

Rewarded 2.17 2.16

Recognized by the chair and/or colleagues 2.62 2.92*

Required 2.49 2.69

Range: ( 1 = None of it, 4 = All of it ) *significant at the .05 level


20

ServiceThink about all of the service activities you actually do (100% of your service), including formal and recognized activities as well as informal activities. How much of your service is…(Frequency Distribution)

ITEM None of it Some of it Most of it All of it CMHTN/%

Not talked about/kept from my colleagues 1142.3%

1453.8%

13.8%

00.0%

26100%

Rewarded 28.0%

1872.0%

416.0%

14.0%

25100%

Recognized by the chair and/or colleagues 00.0%

623.1%

1661.5%

415.4%

26100%

Required 00.0%

1038.5%

1453.8%

27.1%

26100%


21

Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your Department Chair for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

Helpful 3.60 3.94

Clear 3.83 4.19

Accurate 3.78 3.94

Constructive 3.73 3.94

Range: (1 = Never, 5 = Always)


22

Merit Think about the feedback you receive your Department Chair for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Frequency Distribution)

ITEM Never Almost never Sometimes Almost always Always CMHTN/%

Helpful 16.2%

00.0%

425.0%

531.2%

637.5%

16100%

Clear 16.2%

00.0%

212.5%

531.2%

850.0%

16100%

Accurate 16.2%

00.0%

425.0%

531.2%

637.5%

16100%

Constructive 16.2%

00.0%

531.2%

318.8%

743.8%

16100%


23

Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your PAC for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

Helpful 3.43 3.92

Clear 3.66 4.08

Accurate 3.62 4.00

Constructive 3.50 3.85

Range: (1 = Never, 5 = Always)


24

Merit Think about the feedback you receive from your PAC for your merit reviews. Is the evaluation you receive…(Frequency Distribution)

ITEM Never Almost never

Sometimes Almost always

Always CMHTN/%

Helpful 00.0%

00.0%

646.2%

215.4%

538.5%

13100%

Clear 00.0%

17.7%

323.1%

323.1%

646.2%

13100%

Accurate 00.0%

00.0%

430.8%

538.5%

430.8%

13100%

Constructive 00.0%

00.0%

753.8%

17.7%

538.5%

13100%


25

Promotion

Range: (1 = Not at all important, 4 = Very important)

How important is/was it to you to achieve the rank of full professor? (Full professors only respondents) (Mean)


3.5

3.55

3.6

3.65

3.7

3.75

3.8

3.85

3.60

3.79

UNTCMHT

26

PromotionHow important is/was it to you to achieve the rank of full professor? (Full professors only respondents) (Frequency Distribution)

Not at all important

Somewhat unimportant

Somewhat important

Very important

CMHTN/%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

3

21.4%

11

78.6%

14

100%


27

PromotionHow much did the following factors affect your decision to apply for promotion to full professor at UNT? (Rank of Full Professor but not hired as Full Professor) (Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

I believed I was ready. 3.82 4.00

A colleague thought I should. 2.82 1.00

My chair thought I should. 2.88 4.00

My dean thought I should. 2.43 4.00

One of more people did not think I should. 1.42 1.00

No one ever talked to me about it. 1.45

I needed to make a better salary. 2.50 4.00

Range: (1 = None, 4 = A lot)


28

PromotionHow much did the following factors affect your decision to apply for promotion to full professor at UNT? (Rank of Full Professor but not hired as Full Professor)(Frequency Distribution)

ITEM None Little Some A lot CMHTN/%

I believed I was ready. N < 5

A colleague thought I should.

N < 5

My chair thought I should.

N < 5

My dean thought I should.

N < 5

One of more people did not think I should.

N < 5

No one ever talked to me about it.

N < 5

I needed to make a better salary.

N < 5


29

PromotionITEM UNT CMHT

Members of my department give me helpful advice. 3.15 3.00

The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 2.75 3.00

The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent.

2.80 2.80

It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted.

2.42 3.00

I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion.

3.04 3.80*

I am comfortable asking about performance expectations.

3.09 3.00

I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted.

2.67 2.40

Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 3.19 3.40

Range (1= Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree)* significant at .05 level

Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. (Assistant Professor respondents only) (Mean)


30

PromotionITEM Strongly

disagreeDisagree Agree Strongly

agreeCMHTN/%

Members of my department give me helpful advice. 00.0%

116.7%

466.7%

116.7%

6100%

The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 00.0%

233.3%

233.3%

233.3%

6100%

The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent.

00.0%

240.0%

240.0%

120.0%

5100%

It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted.

116.7%

00.0%

350.0%

233.3%

6100%


00.0%

00.0%

120.0%

480.0%

5100%

I am comfortable asking about performance expectations.

00.0%

116.7%

466.7%

116.7%

6100%

I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted.

00.0%

360.0%

240.0%

00.0%

5100%

Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 00.0%

00.0%

360.0%

240.0%

5100%

Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. (Assistant Professor respondents only) (Frequency Distribution)


31

PromotionITEM UNT CMHT

Members of my department give me helpful advice. 2.57 3.18**

The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 2.33 3.06**

The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent. 2.41 2.85

It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted. 2.57 2.62

I am reluctant to talk about controversial issues because it might affect my promotion. 2.39 1.94*

I am comfortable asking about performance expectations. 2.86 3.13

I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted. 2.32 2.31

Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 2.86 3.07

Range: ( 1 = Strongly disagree; 4 = Strongly agree) * *significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Full Professor. (Associate Professor respondents only) (Mean)


32

PromotionITEM Strongly


agreeCMHTN/%

Members of my department give me helpful advice. 15.9%

211.8%

741.2%

741.7%

17100%

The tenure and promotion requirements are very clear. 15.9%

317.6%

741.2%

635.3%

17100%

The tenure and promotion process is fair and consistent. 00.0%

538.5%

538.5%

323.1%

13100%

It is difficult to know exactly what I should be doing to be promoted. 17.7%

538.5%

538.5%

215.4%

13100%


531.2%

850.0%

212.5%

16.2%

16100%

I am comfortable asking about performance expectations. 00.0%

212.5%

1062.5%

425.0%

16100%

I feel like I have control over whether I will be promoted. 215.4%

538.5%

646.2%

00.0%

13100%

Good mentoring is critical to my being promoted. 00.0%

214.3%

964.3%

321.4%

14100%

Please address the following issues about tenure and promotion to Full Professor. (Associate Professor respondents only) (Frequency Distribution)


33

Promotion

to Associate Professor to Full Professor1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

3.49

2.973.20 3.20

UNTCMHT

Range: (1 = Very unlikely, 4 = Very likely)

How likely are you to be promoted?(Assistant and Associate Professor respondents only) (Mean)


34

Promotion How likely are you to be promoted?(Assistant and Associate Professor respondents only)(Frequency Distribution)

Very unlikely Unlikely Likely Very likely CMHTN/%

Associate Professor

Full Professor

Associate Professor

Full Professor

Associate Professor

Full Professor

Associate Professor

Full Professor

Associate Professor

Full Professor

1

20.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

1

20.0%

1

20.0%

2

40.0%

3

60.0%

2

40.0%

5

100%

5

100.0%


35

WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester. (Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

Preparing to teach assigned courses, labs, etc. 3.49 3.83*

Teaching the assigned courses, labs, studies and communicating with those students 3.50 3.64

Teaching or mentoring students in any type of independent study, master theses or dissertations 3.39 2.96

Formally advising students 3.27 3.09

Advising or mentoring “extra” students who seek you out, not those assigned to you 3.62 3.57

Conducting your scholarly activities (i.e., research, composing, etc.) 3.29 2.91

Writing proposals (e.g., grants) to conduct your research/scholarship/creative activities 2.83 2.73

Providing peer reviewing (i.e., reviewing the scholarly or creative work of others) 3.05 2.76

External paid consulting 2.02 1.83

Mentoring other faculty 2.77 2.55

Committee, administrative, or governance work inside your department 3.30 3.26

Committee work at the college or university level 2.92 3.08

Outreach or community service 3.00 2.45*

Advising or working with student organizations 2.71 2.29

Range: (1 = much less than other people 5 = Much more than other people) * significant at .05 level


36

WorkloadPlease choose the proportion of time you spent during the 2011-2012 academic year for each of the following. For new faculty, choose the proportion of time you spent working during the fall semester… (than other people) (Frequency Distribution)

ITEM Much less

Somewhat less

About the

same

Somewhat more

Much more

CMHT

N/%

Preparing to teach assigned courses, labs, etc. 0

0.0%

0

0.0%

9

37.5%

10

41.7%

5

20.8%

24

100%

Teaching the assigned courses, labs, studies and communicating with those students 0

0.0%

0

0.0%

12

54.5%

6

27.3%

4

18.2%

22

100%

Teaching or mentoring students in any type of independent study, master theses or dissertations

4

17.4%

1

4.3%

12

52.2%

4

17.4%

2

8.7%

23

100%

Formally advising students 2

8.7%

3

13.0%

11

47.8%

5

21.7%

2

8.7%

23

100%

Advising or mentoring “extra” students who seek you out, not those assigned to you 0

0.0%

1

4.8%

9

42.9%

9

42.9%

2

9.5%

21

100%

Conducting your scholarly activities (i.e., research, composing, etc.) 6

27.3%

2

9.1%

6

27.3%

4

18.2%

4

18.2%

22

100%


37


ITEM Much less Somewhat less About the same Somewhat more

Much more CHMT

N/%Writing proposals (e.g., grants) to conduct your research/scholarship/creative activities

6

27.3%

4

18.2%

5

22.7%

4

18.2%

3

13.6%

22

100%

Providing peer reviewing (i.e., reviewing the scholarly or creative work of others)

5

23.8%

5

23.8%

4

19.0%

4

19.0%

3

14.3%

21

100%

External paid consulting

11

61.1%

2

11.1%

3

16.7%

1

5.6%

1

5.6%

18

100%

Mentoring other faculty

7

31.8%

3

13.6%

7

31.8%

3

13.6%

2

9.1%

22

100%

Committee, administrative, or governance work inside your department

2

8.7%

3

13.0%

9

39.1%

5

21.7%

4

17.4%

23

100%


38


ITEM Much less Somewhat less About the same Somewhat more

Much more CMHT

N/%Committee work at the college or university level

2

8.3%

5

20.8%

9

37.5%

5

20.8%

3

12.5%

24

100%

Outreach or community service

6

27.3%

6

27.3%

5

22.7%

4

18.2%

1

4.5%

22

100%

Advising or working with student organizations

9

42.9%

3

14.3%

4

19.0%

4

19.0%

1

4.8%

21

100%


39

ResourcesITEM UNT CMHT

Office space 2.99 2.52**

Space for research, scholarly or creative activities 2.78 2.56

Travel funds 2.43 2.64

Course assignments 2.96 3.40**

Clerical, technical, or administrative support 2.82 2.28**

Range: ( 1 = Strongly disagree; 4 = Strongly agree) ** significant at .01 level

How satisfied are you with the distribution of the following in your department? (Mean)


40

ResourcesITEM Very

dissatisfiedDissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied CMHT

N/%

Office space 520.0%

624.0%

1040.0%

416.0%

25100%

Space for research, scholarly or creative activities 312.0%

936.0%

936.0%

416.0%

25100%

Travel funds 28.0%

832.0%

1248.0%

312.0%

25100%

Course assignments 00.0%

28.0%

1144.0%

1248.0%

25100%

Clerical, technical, or administrative support 312.0%

1248.0%

1040.0%

00.0%

25100%

How satisfied are you with the distribution of the following in your department? (Frequency Distribution)


41

Mentoring How important is mentoring for each of the following areas? (Mean)

ITEM UNT CMHT

To learn how things are done at UNT 3.19 3.36

To learn how to get along in your department or college

3.07 3.24

To improve teaching or manage students 3.14 3.32

To improve research or scholarly/artistic activities

3.24 3.44

To move into leadership positions 2.95 3.24

Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal)


42

Mentoring How important is mentoring for each of the following areas? (Frequency Distribution)

ITEM Not at all important

Less important Important Very important CMHT

N/%

To learn how things are done at UNT

0

0.0%

1

4.0%

14

56.0%

10

40.0%

25

100%

To learn how to get along in your department or college

0

0.0%

4

16.0%

11

44.0%

10

40.0%

25

100%

To improve teaching or manage students 0

0.0%

2

8.0%

13

52.0%

10

40.0%

25

100%

To improve research or scholarly/artistic activities

0

0.0%

3

12.0%

8

32.0%

14

56.0%

25

100%

To move into leadership positions

0

0.0%

5

20.0%

9

36.0%

11

44.0%

25

100%


43

Work/Family Balance ITEM UNT CMHT

Household responsibilities 2.75 2.88

Childcare 1.87 2.04Caring for someone who is ill, disabled, aging or with special needs 1.78 1.72

Your health 2.40 2.48

Cost of living 2.70 3.00

Meeting work expectations 3.08 3.28

The way your personal life and work interfere with each other 2.79 2.80

Having a successful academic/artistic career 3.05 2.92

Your salary 2.94 3.04

Faculty morale in your department 2.82 2.12**

Subtle discrimination 2.14 1.96

Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) ** significant at .01 level

The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Mean)


44

Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very little Some A great deal CMHT

N/%

Household responsibilities 3

12.0%

2

8.0%

15

60.0%

5

20.0%

25

100%

Childcare 13

52.0%

1

4.0%

8

32.0%

3

12.0%

25

100%

Caring for someone who is ill, disabled, aging or with special needs

16

64.0%

3

12.0%

3

12.0%

3

12.0%

25

100%

Your health 5

20.0%

7

28.0

9

36.0%

4

16.0%

25

100%

Cost of living 2

8.0%

4

16.0%

11

44.0%

8

32.0%

25

100%

Meeting work expectations 0

0.0%

2

8.0%

14

56.0%

9

36.0%

25

100%

The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Frequency Distribution)


45

Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very little Some A great deal CMHT

N/%

The way your personal life and work interfere with each other

3

12.0%

5

20.0%

11

44.0%

6

24.0%

25

100%

Having a successful academic/artistic career

3

12.0%

5

20.0%

8

32.0%

9

36.0%

25

100%

Your salary 0

0.0%

6

24.0%

12

48.0%

7

28.0%

25

100%

Faculty morale in your department 6

24.0%

11

44.0%

7

28.0%

1

4.0%

25

100%

Subtle discrimination 11

44.0%

6

24.0%

6

24.0%

2

8.0%

25

100%



Work/Family Balance

47

Work/Family Balance ITEM UNT CMHT

Prospects for tenure1.83 2.04

Prospects for promotion 2.39 2.76

Leadership opportunities2.07 2.40

The amount of support in your work environment

2.56 2.60

Acceptance for people like you2.07 2.24

The racial, ethnic or cultural climate at UNT1.89 1.76

Opportunities to have a happy social life2.22 2.28

Time to do your research/scholarship/creative activities

3.01 2.52*

Time to spend with students2.41 2.44

Time to spend with your spouse or significant other

2.69 2.68

Time to spend with your children or other family members

2.54 2.44

Range: ( 1 = None, 4 = A great deal) * significant at .05 level

The following are possible sources of stress for faculty. Rate the amount of stress you feel about each one. (Mean)


48

Work/Family Balance ITEM None Very

littleSome A great

dealCMHT

N/%

Prospects for tenure12

50.0%

4

16.7%

3

12.5%

5

20.8%

24

100%

Prospects for promotion 4

16.0%

6

24.0%

7

28.0%

8

32.0%

25

100%

Leadership opportunities4

16.0%

9

36.0%

10

40.0%

2

8.0%

25

100%

The amount of support in your work environment3

12.0%

8

32.0%

10

40.0%

4

16.0%

25

100%

Acceptance for people like you8

32.0%

6

24.0%

8

32.0%

3

12.0%

25

100%

The racial, ethnic or cultural climate at UNT12

48.0%

7

28.0%

6

24.0%

0

0.0%

25

100%

Opportunities to have a happy social life6

24.0%

10

40.0%

5

20.0%

4

16.0%

25

100%

Time to do your research/scholarship/creative activities7

28.0%

5

20.0%

6

24.0%

7

28.0%

25

100%

Time to spend with students2

8.0%

13

52.0%

7

28.0%

3

12.0%

25

100%

Time to spend with your spouse or significant other4

16.0%

5

20.0%

11

44.0%

5

20.0%

25

100%

Time to spend with your children or other family members7

28.0%4

16.0%10

40.0%4

16.0%25

100%



49

Diversity ITEM UNT CMHT

White3.66 3.77

Gay/lesbian3.09 3.15

Bisexual3.02 3.00

Transgendered2.74 2.73

African American3.21 3.55*

Latino3.27 3.52

Native American3.21 3.55*

Asian American (raised in the U.S.) 3.34 3.65*

From an English speaking country3.50 3.68

Range: ( 1 = Very uncomfortable, 4 = Very comfortable) * significant at .05 level

Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were… (Mean)


50

Diversity ITEM Very

uncomfortableUncomfortable Comfortable Very comfortable CMHT

N/%

White0

0.0%

0

0.0%

5

22.7%

17

77.3%

22

100%

Gay/lesbian1

5.0%

3

15.0%

8

40.0%

8

40.0%

20

100%

Bisexual1

5.9%

5

29.4%

4

23.5%

7

41.2%

17

100%

Transgendered3

20.0%

3

20.0%

4

26.7%

5

33.3%

15

100%

African American0

0.0%

0

0.0%

10

45.5%

12

54.5%

22

100%

Latino0

0.0%

0

0.0%

11

47.8%

12

52.2%

23

100%

Native American0

0.0%

0

0.0%

10

45.5%

12

54.5%

22

100%

Asian American (raised in the U.S.)

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

8

34.8%

15

65.2%

23

100%

From an English speaking country

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

7

31.8%

15

68.2%

22

100%

Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Frequency Distribution)


51

Diversity ITEM UNT CMHT

From an Asian country 3.24 3.61*

From a western European country 3.43 3.64

From a central of eastern European country 3.33 3.52

From a Middle Eastern country 3.13 3.41

Differently abled (i.e. disabled) 3.14 3.45

Christian 3.38 3.77**

Religious but not Christian 3.24 3.55*

Agnostic or atheistic 3.25 3.18

Range: ( 1 = Very uncomfortable, 4 = Very comfortable) ** significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Mean)


52

Diversity ITEM Very

uncomfortableUncomfortable Comfortable Very comfortable CMHT

N/%

From an Asian country

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

9

39.1%

14

60.9%

23

100%

From a western European country

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

8

36.4%

14

63.6%

22

100%

From a central of eastern European country

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

11

47.8%

12

52.2%

23

100%

From a Middle Eastern country

0

0.0%

2

9.1%

9

40.9%

11

50.0%

22

100%

Differently abled (i.e. disabled)

0

0.0%

1

5.0%

9

45.0%

10

50.0%

20

100%

Christian0

0.0%

0

0.0%

5

22.7%

17

77.3%

22

100%

Religious but not Christian

0

0.0%

1

4.5%

8

36.4%

13

59.1%

22

100%

Agnostic or atheistic2

11.8%

1

5.9%

6

35.3%

8

47.1%

17

100%

Try not to think about a specific individual, just give your general sense of how comfortable a new faculty member would be in your department if she or he were…(Frequency Distribution)


53

Satisfaction ITEM UNT CMHT

Work at UNT, knowing what you know now 3.79 4.48**

Become a faculty member, knowing what you know now 3.86 4.40*

Leave UNT if not for family 2.67 2.00**

Range: ( 1 = Very unlikely, 5 = Very likely) ** significant at .01 level, * significant at .05 level

How likely would you be to…(Mean)


54

Satisfaction ITEM Very

unlikelyUnlikely Undecided Likely Very

likelyCMHT

N/%

Work at UNT, knowing what you know now 0

0.0%

0

0.0%

1

4.0%

11

44.0%

13

52.0%

25

100%

Become a faculty member, knowing what you know now 0

0.0%

0

0.0%

2

8.0%

11

44.0%

12

48.0%

25

100%

Leave UNT if not for family9

36.0%

10

40.0%

4

16.0%

1

4.0%

1

4.0%

25

100%

How likely would you be to…(Frequency Distribution)


55

Satisfaction ITEM UNT CMHT

Considered quitting your job for another faculty position elsewhere 1.76 1.24*

Considered quitting for a different type of position, not at a university 1.35 1.48

Researched faculty opportunities elsewhere 1.79 1.36*

Researched universities for other types of positions 1.48 1.28

Wished you had a non-academic job 1.28 1.24

Range: ( 1 = never, 5 = almost every day ) * significant at .05 level

How often have you…(Mean)


56

Satisfaction ITEM Never,

or a few times

Many times

Almost every

month

Almost every week

Almost every day

CMHT

N/%

Considered quitting your job for another faculty position elsewhere

20

80.0%

4

16.0%

1

4.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

25

100%

Considered quitting for a different type of position, not at a university

18

72.0%

5

20.0%

0

0.0%

1

4.0%

1

4.0%

25

100%

Researched faculty opportunities elsewhere 19

76.0%

4

16.0%

1

4.0%

1

4.0%

0

0.0%

25

100%

Researched universities for other types of positions 20

80.0%

3

12.0%

2

8.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

25

100%

Wished you had a non-academic job 20

80.0%

4

16.0%

1

4.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

25

100%

How often have you…(Frequency Distribution)


57

The following questions refers to the climate at UNT for faculty who are members of underrepresented groups, including underrepresentation based on race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, etc. Please indicate if you agree or disagree with each statement. (Mean)

ClimateITEM UNT CMHT

Information about underrepresented groups should be more strongly reflected in the curriculum. 2.64 3.20

UNT should hire more faculty from underrepresented groups. 2.99 2.00

There is too much conflict at UNT related to underrepresented groups. 2.02 1.65*

During the last two years subtle discrimination has been a source of stress. 2.14 2.75

Faculty from underrepresented groups are treated fairly at UNT. 2.95 2.50

Range ( 1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree) * significant at .05 level


58

The following questions refers to the climate at UNT for faculty who are members of underrepresented groups, including underrepresentation based on race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, etc. Please indicate if you agree or disagree with each statement. (Frequency Distribution)

ClimateITEM Strongly


agreeCMHT

N/%

Information about underrepresented groups should be more strongly reflected in the curriculum.

212.5%

637.5%

637.5%

212.5%

16100%

UNT should hire more faculty from underrepresented groups. 212.5%

318.8%

850.0%

318.8%

16100%

There is too much conflict at UNT related to underrepresented groups. 847.1%

741.2%

211.8%

0.0.0%

17100%

During the last two years subtle discrimination has been a source of stress. 842.1%

421.1%

631.6%

15.3%

19100%

Faculty from underrepresented groups are treated fairly at UNT. 16.7%

213.3%

533.3%

746.7%

15100%


59

Open-end Responses

Topics UNTN =

CMHTN =

Hiring Offers 513 18

Hiring Practices 278 9

Teaching 274 7

Research 178 3

Service 218 4

Merit 239 8

Promotion 254 5

Workload 159 5

Resources 169 5

Mentoring 189 4

Work/Family Balance 147 7

Diversity 133 5

Satisfaction 172 3

Climate/Fairness 118 4

Total Responses 3,041 872012-13 Climate Survey, College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

faculty climate survey college of merchandising, hospitality and tourism 2012-13

Documents

college of information

college of public affairs

college of musickuruvilla

response rate

online survey

faculty hiring

survey research institute

faculty travel