fairshare model
DESCRIPTION
The Fairshare Model is an idea for a performance-based capital for companies that seek venture capital via a crowdfunded public offering. It aligns the interests of investors and employees in a win-win manner. Visit www.fairsharemodel.com to learn about it and contribute ideas while it is being "crowd vetted".TRANSCRIPT
The Fairshare Model
for Raising Venture Capital via a Crowdfunded Initial Public Offering
Highlights of a book under construction
by Karl M Sjogren
Coming in 2014
We Need Growth! We Need Jobs! Yes!
Yesterday!
Big Problem! Something ought to be done!
Where’s the leadership?
I’m worried about the future. Why isn’t it happening?
Occupy Wall Street! When will recession end?
How do I prepare for the future?
This recession is different—we need new solutions!
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 2
What’s the Solution?
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 3
More education!
Get rid of job-killing regulations!
Government – Business Partnerships!
Entrepreneurs!
Invest in the future!
Better education!
Strengthen bank regulation!
Throw the bums out!
Focus on and fix the problem!
Create opportunity!
Get government out of the way!
Better regulations!
Banks that lend
Crowdfunding!
Reduce the deficit
New Attitudes!
More venture capital!
Competent Government!
Fix the housing market!
Get ready for the new economy!
Yoga!
Healthy food!
There’s an app for that!
Encourage innovation!
Support job-creators!
8/3/2013
Tax Policy
Regulatory Reform
Restrict Imports
Promote Exports
Just Wait Out Cycle
Gov’t Spending
Education
Fiscal Policy
How to Spur Growth?
Labor Law
Environmental Regulations
Product Liability
Quotas
Tariffs
Financing
Trade Agreements
Rates Structure
Incentives
Money Supply
Interest Rates
Improve Access
Reform
Reduce Spending
Increase Spending
Any Other Ideas? Property of Karl M Sjogren 4
?
They identify four strategic initiatives : 1. Encourage immigration by high-
skilled foreigners 2. Improve access to capital for new
firms (subject of the Fairshare Model)
3. Speed up commercialization of innovations at universities
4. Regulatory reform
Many good ideas are being discussed. For example, those put forth in Better Capitalism by Robert Litan and Carl Schramm
8/3/2013
Link to Must-See video sketchbook for Better Capitalism (3 minutes long) http://www.kauffman.org/sketchbook.aspx?VideoId=1845640971001
Property of Karl M Sjogren 5
Pathways to Improve Access to Capital
Wealthy individuals (a.k.a. Angel Investors)
Private Sector
Equity
Accredited Investors Unaccredited
Investors (a/k/a general public)
Loan Guarantees
Government
Tax Incentives to spur equity
investment
Regulatory Reform (e.g. JOBS Act)
8/3/2013
Venture Capital & Private Equity firms
Fairshare Model target audience
Debt
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 6
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 7
Basic Securities Term Definition
Issuer Company selling securities (stocks, notes, bonds)
Accredited Investor
• Someone allowed to invest in start-ups and other private company transactions.
• Defined in Federal securities law. Criteria: Wealthy enough to absorb full loss of investment
• “Angel Investor” = accredited investor who invests their own money (not a fund)
Unaccredited Investor Anyone who is not accredited (general public)
Broker-Dealer Underwriter, investment bank, brokerage firm, etc. • Regulated by government securities agencies & by
self-governing organizations
Private offering Only Accredited Investors may invest
Public offering Anyone may invest • Issuer must first file disclosure documents (registration
statement) acceptable to securities agencies
ENTREPRENEUR: I have an idea but
need money
INVESTOR: How much of your
company do I get if I give you the money?
The Fairshare Model Begins Here
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 8
Fairshare Model Basics • Two classes of stock--“Investor Stock” & “Performance Stock”.
• Investor Stock can trade in the market. It is issued for capital.
• Performance Stock is not tradable.
• Issued to insiders, converts to Investor Stock based on performance. • Performance measured quarterly. • Measures = revenue, earnings, new raises of capital, Investor
Stock price appreciation, etc.
• As a class, Performance Stock controls has half voting control. • Like a stock option that votes, and vests with performance, not the
mere passage of time.
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 9
Target Companies Companies that adopt the Fairshare Model: • May have already raised 1-3 rounds from accredited investors.
• Want to raise $2 to $10 million in public venture capital.
• Can identify an affinity group of likely investors.
• See advantage in having stock broadly held by the public.
• Will use Performance Stock to attract and motivate talent.
Such a company will necessarily: • Be confident it will deliver performance that results in conversion of
Performance Stock to Investor Stock
• Let public investors invest at low valuation.
• Offer protections provided to venture capital funds.
• Embrace the concept of investor oversight.
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 10
Possible Outcomes for Issuers Some companies will fail (start-ups face long odds).
Some will be acquired by other companies.
• Performance Stock conversion will be determined by the holders of Investor Stock and Performance Stock. • Performance Stock deserves compensation if purchase price
delivers attractive return for Investor Stock.
Some will raise more capital & trade on an exchange (NASDAQ).
• The growth may involve acquiring other companies.
Some may convert to a conventional capital structure. • Tried it, did not like it. • A majority of each stock must agree on a new structure.
8/3/2013
Property of Karl M Sjogren 11
Snapshot
Voting Control
Investor Stock
Performance Stock
Ability to Trade
Investor Stock
Performance Stock
• Performance Stock can never trade.
• Investor Stock is registered with SEC.
• Trading market likely to start off thin, then improve as company performs.
• Matters that would require approval from each class of stock:
• Board member election
• Change to conversion criteria.
• Compensation plans involving Investor Stock.
• Changes to capital structure.
• Acquisition matters.
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 12
Who Will Like What?
8/3/2013
Key Attributes of the Fairshare Model Investors Companies
Access to equity venture capital Pre-IPO angel investors have an exit Performance Stock is a POWERFUL competitive advantage for managing human capital Broadly distributed Investor Stock creates evangelists to promote the company’s interests
Insiders do not get rich just because there is an IPO To sell stock, must have bought it or earned it Investors and insiders share voting control Ability to acquire other companies with public stock
Property of Karl M Sjogren 13
Fundamental Problem of a Conventional Capital Structure
Assessing an early–stage company is as difficult as divining the adult achievement of young child.
8/3/2013
A conventional capital structure requires a company to strike a valuation at each round of investment that pre-supposes performance.
Accredited investors are protected from overpaying for a private venture capital deal. A conventional model is NO PROBLEM for them.
Investors in a public venture capital deal are not protected from overpaying. A conventional model is a BIG PROBLEM for them. But most don’t realize it.
• Indicators are there, but can be wrong or misleading.
• Valuation = Value of an idea, of future performance • “The company is worth $100 million.”
Property of Karl M Sjogren 14
Overpayment Protection: Who Has It
8/3/2013
Accredited Investors in a private venture
capital deal OVERPAYMENT PROTECTION
Know the deal valuation They know how to calculate the price to
buy the company, given the deal terms.
Get anti-dilution provisions Provide price protection by re-pricing investor shares lower if a subsequent financing is at a lower valuation than the round they bought into.
Investors in a public venture
capital deal NO OVERPAYMENT PROTECTION
Valuation-Unaware Unaccredited investors do not know how to calculate valuation nor its importance.
Issuers not obligated to disclose valuation, let alone discuss why its reasonable. Unable to invest earlier, small investors compete to pay “retail” for a “wholesale” deal; they invest with the zeal of “Black Friday” shoppers –but not for “deals”. They have no protection from overpaying
Property of Karl M Sjogren 15
What is a “Venture-Stage” Company?
8/3/2013
• Market for its products/services is new/uncertain
• Unproven business model
• Uncertain timeline to profitable operations
• Negative cash flow from operations
• In other words, it requires investor cash to operate
• Little or no sustainable competitive advantage
• Execution risk; team may not build value for investors
A company with these risk factors:
Property of Karl M Sjogren 16
Many public companies list such risk factors in their disclosure documents
Public Venture Capital
8/3/2013
capital provided to a venture-stage company
…is “venture capital”….
… whether its from accredited investors…
…or from public investors!
Same Girl, Different Dress
In substance, Private Venture
Capital Public Venture
Capital
Property of Karl M Sjogren 17
What You Pay to Play…
8/3/2013
… venture capitalist…
… who you are!
Who R U?
…depends on….
Let’s explore how
Property of Karl M Sjogren 18
Private Venture Capital Supply-Chain
8/3/2013
Some accredited investors invest only in the early rounds.
• Angel investors are early investors, but seek VC funds to for rounds over $1-2 million.
• VCs with operational expertise are the “lead institutional investor” (i.e., evaluate deal, serve on board of directors) for other investment funds that prefer to follow.
Others favor later rounds, after its apparent the company is on-track to have an IPO or be acquired (i.e. exits are visible).
Property of Karl M Sjogren 19
Classic Conventional Valuation Trend
8/3/2013
The valuation for accredited investors begins low and increases over ensuing rounds to the price offered to “public venture capital” investors.
Example
Property of Karl M Sjogren 20
What Best Explains the Trend?
8/3/2013
Risk reduction?
Performance?
What the Next Guy (the public or potential acquirer) may pay?
The Fairshare Model book will posit a Next Guy Theory for buyer behavior
• To a degree
• See Risk Factors in a IPO prospectus
• Guestimate: this explains 30-60% of the late pre-IPO valuation increase
Property of Karl M Sjogren 21
Who is the Next Guy for Unaccredited Investors?
8/3/2013
There isn’t one…except other public investors
Downside Exposure Public investors at greater risk of overpaying for a venture stage deal than pre-IPO investors
Property of Karl M Sjogren 22
Possibilities: Conventional Model
8/3/2013
Valuations between years 2-8 in this example are better explained… by who the Next Guy will be… than by what the company’s performance is.
Property of Karl M Sjogren 23
8/3/2013
Possibilities: Fairshare Model Same example, but the valuation (aggregate of Investor Stock) is explained by performance, and it’s shared by investors and insiders, as Performance Stock converts to Investor Stock.
IPO valuation comparable to what a VC might pay.
Property of Karl M Sjogren 24
How to Begin? Fairshare Model = disruptive innovation in the structure of securities.
– “Crowdfunding” is an innovation in the distribution of securities.
Innovations are challenging if they are not pushed by suppliers, demanded by customers or required by government.
– “Dutch Auction” approach to IPO pricing. Good idea! Not pushed by “suppliers” (issuers, investment banks), demanded by customers (those positioned to “flip” shares) nor required by government or the self governing organizations that oversee exchanges.
Fairshare Model does not benefit existing players. – Venture capital and private equity funds; investment bankers; Investors positioned to “flip”
hot IPO shares, or, IPO companies with a conventional capital structure
Issuers will not adopt it unless it helps them raise capital. – General investor interest must be there.
It’s beneficiaries don’t realize they get a bad deal now, or, feel helpless. – Valuation-unaware – Weak understanding of investor protections – More concerned with access to deals than with terms of deals
8/3/2013 Property of Karl M Sjogren 25
Concept Gap
8/3/2013
Where the Fairshare
Model is now
Concept Gap
Should Investor Interest be significant, some issuers will adopt it
If Early Issuers and Investors benefit, more issuers will
adopt it
Should it become popular, capitalism will have evolved
in interesting ways.
Better Capitalism!!!!
Property of Karl M Sjogren 26
Help Narrow the Concept Gap If the model appeals to you, please create buzz .
• Talk about the Fairshare Model • Spread the word via social networking • Join the community at www.fairsharemodel.com
to hear what others have to say—favorable or not. I will publish a book on the Fairshare Model by Q4 2013.
• I seek critical input from attorneys, financial experts, angel investors, etc. while working on it.
Companies: my focus is to define a credible & attractive equity capital option for you; if investor interest is there, the next step will be to define “how-to” guidance. Email me at [email protected]
8/3/2013
The Fairshare Model Needs You!
Property of Karl M Sjogren 27
This is the construction of the Fairshare Model.
It’s mission: to explore new relationships between labor and capital,
to help entrepreneurs finance companies with public venture capital,
to boldly go where no capital structure has gone before.
8/3/2013
Better Capitalism…the new frontier
Property of Karl M Sjogren 28