fathima critique

47
RESEARCH CRITIQUE

Upload: alwin-varghese-t

Post on 05-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 1/47

RESEARCHCRITIQUE

Page 2: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 2/47

Statement of the problem

A study to evaluate the effectivenessof training programme on home caremanagement of neurologically

debilitated clients on the self efficacyof their caregivers in selected wardsof AIMS Kochi

Page 3: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 3/47

Critique• Statement is clear• Target population mentioned• Word strength appropriate• Setting mentioned

• Design not mentioned• Variables-

dependent-self efficacy of care

giversIndependent-training programme

on home caremanagement

Page 4: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 4/47

Objective

• Compare the self efficacy of caregivers of neurologically deblitatedclients before and after training on

home care management

• Assess the occurance of complications among neurologically

deblitated clients after training onhome care management for theircare givers

Page 5: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 5/47

• Identify the association between self efficacy and selected demographicvariables

Page 6: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 6/47

Critique

• Measurable ,achievable and clear

• Starts with action verb

• Conveys only one message• Logical link

• Variables are identified

• Tool is not mentioned

Page 7: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 7/47

hypothesis

• There will be a significantimprovement in self efficacy of caregivers after training on home care

management

• The hypothesis is tested at 0.05 levelof significance

Page 8: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 8/47

critique

• Testable

• Level of significance mentioned

• Directional• Study population not mentioned

Page 9: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 9/47

Conceptual frame work

• Orem’s self care deficit theory 

Page 10: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 10/47

Critique

• suitable

• It is based on the theory

• It guides the research study• Concepts are linked

• Concepts are defined

• Presents the relation amongconcepts

Page 11: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 11/47

variables

• Independent variables

Training programme on home caremanagement

• Dependent variables

The self efficacy of care givers and

the occurrence of complications inneurologically debilitated patients

Page 12: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 12/47

• Extraneous variables

Age,sex,educationalstatus,income,occupation,relationship with client and previous experienceof the caregiver

• Knowledge gained by the care giversthrough observation of the nursingcare given by the nurses

Page 13: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 13/47

• Age ,medical diagnosis,level of consciousness and functional statusof the client

Page 14: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 14/47

critique

• Variables are clear,defined well

• Measures to control extraneousvariables were not described

• Variables reflects the concepts of frame work

Page 15: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 15/47

Review of literature

The literature reviewed of the study isclassified following sub headings

1.Complications of neurologically

debilitated clients2.Care giver burden

3.Caregiver training

4.Effect of training on self efficacy of caregivers

Page 16: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 16/47

critique

• There is a logical sequence

• Relationship of the study to previousresearch is clear

• Literature review has supported thepresent study

• The literature is critiqued by theresearcher

• gaps in literature are described

Page 17: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 17/47

• Uptodate

• Year is not mentioned in some studies

• Name of the auther is not present in some

studies

• Setting is mentioned

• Design not mentioned in few

• Study results are given but statisticalreference are not given

Page 18: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 18/47

Ethical consideration

• Consent

• Clearence certificate

Page 19: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 19/47

Research design

• Quasi experimental one grouppretest post test design

• Longitudinal study

• Duration of data collection-2wks

Page 20: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 20/47

critique

• Interventions included

• Operational definitions are given

• Not cenceptually defined• Randomisation not done

• Timing of data collection appropriate

Page 21: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 21/47

Population and sampling

• Target population-Care givers of neurologically debilitated clientsbetween the age group of20-60 yrs

• Accessible population-Care givers of neurologically debilitated clients whowere admitted during the study

period in neuro - medical andsurgical ward

Page 22: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 22/47

Sampling design

• Convenience sampling

Sample size -30

Page 23: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 23/47

Inclusion criteria• Primary care givers of neurologically

debilitated clients• Care givers between 20 -60 yrs of age• Care givers of neurologically debilitated

clients who were admitted in the neuromedical surgical wards of AIMS

• Care givers of neurologically debilitatedclients who were unable to meet their

activities of daily living such as mouthcare,bathing feeding ,exercise.

Page 24: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 24/47

• Care givers of neurologicallydebilitated clients who were free of complication related to poor oral

hygiene poor skin hygiene andnasogastric tube feeding

• Primary care givers who were willing

to participate in the study.

Page 25: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 25/47

Exclusion criteria

• Health , social or voluntary healthcare providers

• Care givers other than primary caregivers

• Care givers who couldn't understandEnglish or Malayalam.

Page 26: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 26/47

critique

• Population identified and described

• Adequate sample size

Page 27: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 27/47

DATA COLLECTION

• For 2 weeks

• Structured questionnaire andobservation check list

Telephonic interview

• Setting –neurological ward-42 and55

Page 28: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 28/47

Critique

• Triangulation present

• Setting was appropriate

Page 29: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 29/47

Instruments• Standard questionnaire

• Check list

• Self reported questionnaire

Page 30: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 30/47

• Tool-1

Section A: Demographic data of 

care givers.Section B: Knowledgequestionnaire

Tool-2

Observation check list on backcare , bed bath , nasogastric tubefeeding and range of motion

exerciseTool-3

Self report questionnaire on

occurrence of complication

Page 31: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 31/47

• Tools prepared with modification by

suggestion of experts.• Tool 1 &2 transalated in Malayalamwith help of laguage experts andback to English to validate language

• For conent validity submitted to 10experts

• Validity index Tool 1 -0.934

• Tool 2 -0.896• Tool 3 -0.941

Page 32: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 32/47

• Reliability- Split half method(knoledge questionnaire)

• Inter ratereliability tested for checklist and self reported questionnaire

Page 33: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 33/47

critique

• Appropriate instruments used

• Reliability and validity adequate

• Instructions are clear• Section wise categorization of tool

was done.

Page 34: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 34/47

data analysis

• Descriptive and inferential statistics

DISCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Demographic data analyzed using

frequencies and percentagePretest post test score on self efficacy was

computed by calculating mean andstandard deviation

Occurrence of complication of clientsassessed by frequency distribution andpercentage

Page 35: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 35/47

Inferential

• Significance of difference betweenpre test and post test score tested bypaired t test

• Association between self efficacywith selected demographic variablesdone by ANOVA test

Page 36: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 36/47

• Mean standard deviation meandeference and t value of skill scorebefore and after training programme

was done – The post test score morethan pretest t value found to besignificant at 0.001 level

Page 37: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 37/47

critique

• Parametric tests were used

• Level of significance were identified

Page 38: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 38/47

Data analysis- Distribution of subjects according to

demographic variables were done.-The deference in self efficacy of subjects

before and after training programme.for this mean standard deviation mean

deference and t value of knowledge forwere found. The paired t test value of knowledge score computed before andafter training

-Mean post tests are higher than meanpre test score

• Deference in mean is highly significantat 0.001 level

Page 39: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 39/47

• ANOVA test computed betweenknowledge and skill of care giverswith age , sex, education and

occupation.

Page 40: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 40/47

result

• Result of each hypothesis clearly andobjectively presented

• Graph and bar diagrams were used

Page 41: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 41/47

Conclusion And discussion

• Based on results, based onhypothesis

• Results mentioned under objectives

• Study limitations identified

Page 42: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 42/47

Limitations

• As the study was limited to 30patients the genaralisations of thefindings are limited

• Only knowledge and skill were takeninto considerations leaving outattitude due to time constraints and

the fact that it was out of the scopethe study

Page 43: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 43/47

• The clients with different neurologicalproblems were included in the study.

Page 44: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 44/47

implications

• Discussed under heading

• Nursing practice, nursing education,nursing administration and nursingresearch

Page 45: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 45/47

Recommendations

• Same study can conducted on a largegroup to generalise findings

• A similar study can be conducted with

control group• A study can be replicated in community

settings

• A study can be conducted to develop aSIM based on the needs of the caregiver

•  

Page 46: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 46/47

• Similar study can be undertaken onknowledge attitude and skill of caregivers on home care management

• Long term study can be planned tounderstand the effectiveness of training programme on occurrence of 

complications

Page 47: Fathima Critique

8/2/2019 Fathima Critique

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fathima-critique 47/47

critique

• Application of conceptual frame workwas not given

• Other studies which are contradictoywas not given

• The study is relevant to practice

• Benefit outweigh the risk