fe panel data assumptions
DESCRIPTION
FE Panel Data assumptions. Assumption #1: E ( u it | X i 1 ,…, X iT , i ) = 0 . Assumption #2: ( X i 1 ,…, X iT ,Y i 1 ,…, Y iT ), i =1,…, n , are i.i.d. draws from their joint distribution . Assumption #5: corr( u it , u is | X it , X is , i ) = 0 for t ≠ s. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
FE Panel Data assumptions
![Page 2: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Assumption #1: E(uit|Xi1,…,XiT,i) = 0
![Page 3: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Assumption #2: (Xi1,…,XiT,Yi1,…,YiT), i =1,…,n, are i.i.d. draws from their joint distribution
![Page 4: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Assumption #5: corr(uit,uis|Xit,Xis,i) = 0 for t ≠s
![Page 5: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Assumption #5 in a matrix:
![Page 6: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Random Effects Panel Data model
![Page 7: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Random Effects vs. Fixed Effects
![Page 8: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Random Effects Panel Data model
![Page 9: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
. use fatality
. xtset state year panel variable: state (strongly balanced) time variable: year, 1982 to 1988 delta: 1 unit
. gen vfr = mrall*10000
. xtreg vfr beertax, fe
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 336Group variable: state Number of groups = 48
R-sq: within = 0.0407 Obs per group: min = 7 between = 0.1101 avg = 7.0 overall = 0.0934 max = 7
F(1,287) = 12.19corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.6885 Prob > F = 0.0006
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vfr | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beertax | -.6558736 .18785 -3.49 0.001 -1.025612 -.2861352 _cons | 2.377075 .0969699 24.51 0.000 2.186212 2.567937-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma_u | .7147146 sigma_e | .18985942 rho | .93408484 (fraction of variance due to u_i)------------------------------------------------------------------------------F test that all u_i=0: F(47, 287) = 52.18 Prob > F = 0.0000
. estimates store figs
![Page 10: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
. xtreg vfr beertax, re
Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 336Group variable: state Number of groups = 48
R-sq: within = 0.0407 Obs per group: min = 7 between = 0.1101 avg = 7.0 overall = 0.0934 max = 7
Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(1) = 0.18corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.6753
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vfr | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beertax | -.0520158 .1241758 -0.42 0.675 -.2953959 .1913643 _cons | 2.067141 .0999715 20.68 0.000 1.871201 2.263082-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma_u | .5157915 sigma_e | .18985942 rho | .88067496 (fraction of variance due to u_i)------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. estimates store rutabagas
. hausman figs rutabagas
---- Coefficients ---- | (b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) | figs rutabagas Difference S.E.-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beertax | -.6558736 -.0520158 -.6038579 .1409539------------------------------------------------------------------------------ b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic
chi2(1) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B) = 18.35 Prob>chi2 = 0.0000
![Page 11: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
What if Assumption #5 fails: so corr(uit,uis|Xit,Xis,i) ≠ 0?
![Page 12: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Standard Errors under FE
![Page 13: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Sampling distribution of fixed effects estimator, ctd.
![Page 14: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Sampling distribution of fixed effects estimator, ctd.
![Page 15: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Case I: when uit, uis uncorrelated
![Page 16: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Case II: uit and uis are correlated
![Page 17: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Case II: Clustered Standard Errors
![Page 18: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Comments on clustered standard errors:
![Page 19: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Comments on clustered standard errors, ctd.
![Page 20: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Comments on clustered standard errors, ctd.
![Page 21: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Implementation in STATA
![Page 22: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Case II: treat uit and uis as possibly correlated
![Page 23: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Try adding year effects:
![Page 24: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
. xtreg vfr beertax yr2 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr7, fe vce(cluster state)
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 336Group variable: state Number of groups = 48
R-sq: within = 0.0803 Obs per group: min = 7 between = 0.1101 avg = 7.0 overall = 0.0876 max = 7
F(7,47) = 4.36corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.6781 Prob > F = 0.0009
(Std. Err. adjusted for 48 clusters in state)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robust vfr | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beertax | -.6399799 .3570783 -1.79 0.080 -1.358329 .0783691 yr2 | -.0799029 .0350861 -2.28 0.027 -.1504869 -.0093188 yr3 | -.0724206 .0438809 -1.65 0.106 -.1606975 .0158564 yr4 | -.1239763 .0460559 -2.69 0.010 -.2166288 -.0313238 yr5 | -.0378645 .0570604 -0.66 0.510 -.1526552 .0769262 yr6 | -.0509021 .0636084 -0.80 0.428 -.1788656 .0770615 yr7 | -.0518038 .0644023 -0.80 0.425 -.1813645 .0777568 _cons | 2.42847 .2016885 12.04 0.000 2.022725 2.834215-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma_u | .70945965 sigma_e | .18788295 rho | .93446372 (fraction of variance due to u_i)------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember, we should use xtreg:
• Exact same as , fe robust !!! Stata version 9 incorrect! Stata 10, 11 good• Stock & Watson (2008), “Heteroskedasticity-Robust Standard Errors for Fixed Effect
Panel Data Regression,” Econometrica, 76 (1): 155 – 74.
![Page 26: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Application: Drunk Driving Laws and Traffic Deaths (Ruhm, J. Health Econ, 1996)
![Page 27: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Drunk driving laws and traffic deaths, ctd.
![Page 28: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
![Page 30: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
The drunk driving panel data set
![Page 31: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Why might panel data help?
![Page 32: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
![Page 33: FE Panel Data assumptions](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681636a550346895dd443e2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33