february 2012
DESCRIPTION
Accessing and Using Data SIG Schools September 20, 2012 “ Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement. ”. February 2012. Agenda. SLDS Three Outcomes…. Three primary outcomes will drive the work of the SLDS grant. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Accessing and USING DATA
SIG SchoolsSeptember 20, 2012
“Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.”
February 2012
1
Agenda
2
SLDS Three Outcomes….
1.Integrate evaluation system data elements into SLDS
2.Streamline District Data Submission
3.Develop web tools to view evaluation data
4.Create system to administer evaluation process
3
1.Data portal for Legislators, NH DOE, and general citizens.
2.Integrate Special Education database with SLDS.
3.Integrate DHHS data (foster and juvenile justice data) with the K-12 SLDS.
4.Develop ROI indicator.5.Create NH Dashboard. Expand
upon the current district profiles. 6.Develop and deliver P+ training
for new stakeholder groups.7.Create a social network for data
use.
1.Integrate Data for an Early Warning System.
2.Develop Early Warning Indicators and Reports.
3.Integrate data for College and Career Readiness.
4.Develop College Readiness Indicators and Reports.
Note: Tracker and AB are paid for by state. LEA can purchase CC.
Three primary outcomes will drive the work of the SLDS grant.
Evaluation of Effective Educators
Informed Decision Making College and Career
Readiness
SLDS Current Highlights….
• Requirements definition via inquiry from schools and districts, vendors and other states, associations and department staff.
• Definition and procurement of social networking infrastructures.
• Expansion of P+ data store.
• RFP process for trainers and technology development.
4
• RFP for technology development.
• Integration of Special Education common data.
• Determination of business needs.
• Collaboration with postsecondary agencies and SIS vendors.
• Expansion of BOY data collection.
• Definition of early warning requirements via schools and districts.
Work has begun, although funds are not available until September 15th -- shhhh.
Evaluation of Effective Educators
Informed Decision Making
College and Career Readiness
5
It’s all about the STUDENTS!!!
Data Use
What Drives the Data Environment…
6
Data systems must be able to address multiple perspectives and multiple levels of competency: The teacher’s perspective, the administrator’s perspective, the specialist, the district, the policy maker, the researcher, reporting requirements, etc.
Note: Pictures are from clipart.
i4see Data Collection Using Data
7
Collecting & Using DataOur efforts began with the collection of data with an end goal consistently focused on the use of data.
The breadth of data tools
8
Access Education Data from the DOE home page (view the library books icon on the left panel (www.education.nh.gov).
District profiles (public data)
9
District Profiles provide aggregate data available to the public.
Performance plus: Student Level Data
10
PerformancePLUS provides secure student level data to the teachers and educators.
Longitudinal reports
11
Longitudinal Reports provide easy access to predefined aggregate reports.
Data Collection and Reports
12
Aggregate spreadsheets of data available to the public.
NARS (Detailed NECAP Reports)
13
Secure student level NECAP data available to districts, maintained by Measured Progress.
“Growth model”
14
Based upon the Colorado Growth model, aggregate school level NECAP growth data.
A Closer Look
• Longitudinal Reports• Performance PLUS
15
Finally, we will take a more detailed look at the Longitudinal aggregate reports and student level Performance PLUS system.
Longitudinal ReportsYou can scroll down the page to find a given school or district.
16
Predefined ReportsThere are five predefined reports for each school/district.
17
Grade Comparison Over TimeHow do the results of each grade compare to one another over time?
18
Compare SubgroupsFor example, how do students with an IEP compare to students without?
19
Cohort ComparisonCurrent grade 7 Cohort history compared to Grade 7 cohort history for state.
20
A Closer Look – New P+ Reporting Engine
• Longitudinal Reports• Performance PLUS
21
Longitudinal reports provide quick and easy access to extensive aggregate trends. PerformancePLUS provides detailed student level access to custom reports and detailed student learning.
Performance plus: Breadth and Depth
22
P+ Enables multiple assessments, creation of local assessments, detailed analysis of student progress, history over time, extensive student attributes (e.g. 21st Century, CaTE, Attendance, College Enrollment, Assessments, SAT, course schedule, etc.).
How are districts using P+….
1. Performance Tracker– Extensive Reports– Item Level Detail– Student History– Individual Learning
Plans– RTI
23
2. Assessment Builder – State and National
Assessments– Item Bank– Online Assessments– Mapping to
Standards– Local Benchmark
Assessments– CaTE and Survey Style
Assessments
3. Curriculum Connector– Curriculum Bank– Curriculum Mapping – Connection from Map to
Assessment to ReportsNote: Tracker and AB are paid for by state. LEA can purchase CC.
P+ provide three separate modules. It includes much more than data reports. A new reporting engine provide easier reporting access!!!
Drill Down Reports
24
Create dynamic report and drill down to the student level detail.
25
View student progress over years of instruction.
Student Level Detail
Consider Results by Standard
26
View proficiency by standard across multiple assessments (e.g. NECAP and NWEA).
27
Consider Results by ItemUnderstand what released items students are having difficulty completing.
P+ Next Steps
28
There are items currently and progress and some potentials that are being considered.
Moving Forward (sample of items)•Promote new user interface (reporting tool)•Push predefined reports to user’s home page•Create training documents•Develop Social Network•Deploy regional and virtual training•Hire Trainer(s)•Include NWEA growth factor•Create Student Outcome Reports for evaluations (e.g. SLO measures)•Pursue Accuplacer
29
Develop inventory of evaluation system data elements and integrate into SLDS (e.g. teacher
roster, assessment data, competency data, survey data, etc.)
Develop web tools to allow supervisors to view evaluation data
✓
22
33
44
Evaluating Effective Educators
Streamline District Data Submission (reduce effort for district)
Create a system to administer the evaluation process
33
22
11
Potential Models
•P+ and EIS•LEA Model that leverages P+ for student outcomes•Other state-wide growth tools•Fully LEA based model
Outcome 1 of the SLDS grant is to develop tools that will help you with the Evaluation of Effective Educators.
P+ and EIS Model
EIS could allow you to view your teachers in a school, view and track evaluation cycle, view and track progress and schedule to complete
review.
EIS could allow you to view your teachers in a school, view and track evaluation cycle, view and track progress and schedule to complete
review.
SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching
30
P+ would allow you to review student growth
on NECAP as well as other national and local
assessments, parent surveys, etc.
P+ would allow you to review student growth
on NECAP as well as other national and local
assessments, parent surveys, etc.
The grant proposed building upon existing systems, but we can certainly recommend other options if they provide greater benefit to schools and districts.
Student Roster
31
Create a student roster for a teacher – to display multiple assessments and student growth data!
Any 2 Scatter Plot
32
Consider for example how students proficiency levels changed from 6th to 7th grade.
Professional Development & Support
1. Professional development is critical!!!2. A social learning network could provide
training and collaboration across the state.
SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching
33
We are moving forward with professional development tools – to lead our implementations.
Questions – Your Input!!!
• What are you using to track evaluation status?• What are you using to track completion of evaluation
components (e.g. completion of classroom observation, growth reports, etc.)?
• What are you using to identify student growth results? • Do you need tools to manage class-room observations, and
other Charlotte Danielson domains?• Where do you see the biggest need for data system support?• Would you be interested in being part of an advisory group to
help define these tools and support? • If not on the advisory committee, do you have staff that work
with data who would like to share their best practices? • Other comments, suggestions.
SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching
34
We need your input to ensure funds are spent to maximize benefits.
Contact us for Help
35
Mike Schwartz(general questions)
(603) [email protected]
Cyndy Currier(i4see Submissions and P+ Training)
(603) [email protected]
Irene Koffink(SLDS Grant)(603) 271-3865
Karen Soule(Educator Evaluations)
(603) [email protected]
Lauren Heiter(Educator Evaluations)
(603) [email protected]
We are here to help, so please reach out for support, and with questions.
36
Questions….(and Thanks!!!)