feedback from mef only possible, if common coordination meetings main possible conflict: safety...

5
Feedback from MEF Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS Main possible conflict: SAFETY No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on procedure for injectors for end of september Machine responsible should come to meetings already NOW!!!! Injector Re-commissioning WG 1 Machine Preparation Beam Hardware tests Beam Chec kout Access possible No access foreseen time Machine responsible point of view Equipment expert point of view Deadline: controls readiness

Upload: shanon-dalton

Post on 01-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on

Injector Re-commissioning WG 1

Feedback from MEF

Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS Main possible conflict: SAFETY

– No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on procedure for injectors for end of september

Machine responsible should come to meetings already NOW!!!!

Machine Preparation Beam

Hardware tests BeamCheck

out

Access possible No access foreseen

time

Machine responsible point of view

Equipment expert point of view

Deadline: controls readiness

Page 2: Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on

Injector Re-commissioning WG 2

Feedback from MEF (II)

We will start discussing machine responsible per machine soon

Need name per machine for September

Page 3: Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on

Injector Re-commissioning WG 3

WHAT TO TEST, HOW TO TEST

Page 4: Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on

Injector Re-commissioning WG 4

As this was not clear last meeting…

Essentially: try to run the equipment in the same way, as you would with beam, without beam.

Examples: Power converters:

– Timing cycle loaded– Generate operational function for a given cycle.

Optics loaded

Transfer functions OK

– Drive (= load the settings with the operational application)– start and stop with operational application (timing, sequencer)– Current acquisition– Check ripple– Check whether power converter can follow well– Imin OK.– Check logging– Check fixed display, page 1 signals, OASIS acquisition, FEI and SIS– …

Page 5: Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on

Injector Re-commissioning WG 5

A few more remarks concerning testing

Example: preparation for operation of HiRadMat: dry run– HiRadMat cycle, extraction events on– Extraction pre-pulse generation– Check acquisition of all BI in extraction region and transfer lines:

Operational applications: thresholds generated,…

Logging

– Try to calculate kick in the transfer line with YASP Check whether can send it…verifies generation, etc…

– Check interlocks and obtain green light– Move TEDs (depends on access conditions)– Pulse extraction kickers with energy tracking system