feedwater systems reliability users group (jan 2017) austin, tx...

54
FSRUG Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX Stretching NPSHA vs. NPSHR to the Limit Presenter: Art Washburn P.E.

Upload: others

Post on 23-Feb-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017)

Austin, TX

Stretching NPSHA vs. NPSHR to the Limit

Presenter:

Art Washburn P.E.

Page 2: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

DISCUSSION POINTS• Two Rules to Get You Home and Plant Priorities

• Customer Challenge To Perform Inspections & Maintenance Online

• Manage In-Leakage to Accomplish Inspections by Creative Means

• Sump Pump and System

• NPSHR vs. NPSHA

• Source References

Page 3: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Page 4: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Page 5: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Rule #2 – Maintain Design Control

Page 6: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Rule #2 – Maintain Design Control

Plant Priorities:

Page 7: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Rule #2 – Maintain Design Control

Plant Priorities:

1. Nuclear Safety

Page 8: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Rule #2 – Maintain Design Control

Plant Priorities:

1. Nuclear Safety

2. Legal Requirements

Page 9: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Two Rules:

Rule #1 – Make Conservative Decisions

Rule #2 – Maintain Design Control

Plant Priorities:

1. Nuclear Safety

2. Legal Requirements

3. Efficiency

Page 10: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Customer Challenge to Perform Inspections &

Maintenance Online

FSRUG

- Inspect Circulating Water Inlet Piping, Safety

Related

- Cross Tie Valve Between Plants Leaks ~750 GPM

- Dual Unit Outage Required to Allow Personnel

Access to Inspect Piping, Water Box Valves

Page 11: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Creative Ideas Needed

FSRUG

- Site Planning Dual Unit Outage, Estimated Cost

Greater Than $10 Million

- Maintenance Organization Identifies Creative Idea

to Complete Inspections with 750 GPM In-Leakage

- Provide Sump Pump: 1000 GPM @ X FT of Head

Page 12: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Circulating Water Inlet Piping, Water Box, Condenser

FSRUG

Page 13: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Inlet Circulating Water Piping Access Point,

30” Manway

FSRUG

Page 14: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump Predicted Performance Test Curve

FSRUG

Page 15: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

Energy acting on the inlet (suction) side of the pump include:

1. Atmospheric Pressure (positive)

2. Lift (negative)

3. Pump Impeller requirements (negative)

4. Friction losses (negative)

In order for the pump to move the water, the Net Positive Suction

Head Available (NPSHA) must be greater than the Net Positive

Suction Head Required (NPSHR).

NPSHA > NPSHR (FT absolute)

Atmospheric Pressure > Lift + Impeller Requirement + Friction

Losses

Page 16: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

The available suction head (NPSHA) comes from atmospheric

pressure acting on the surface of the water.

1 Atmosphere ~ (14.7 PSIA)(2.31 FT/PSI)/(1.0) ~ 33.9 FT abs

NPSHA = 33.9 FT abs

WATER

Page 17: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

The amount of ‘Lift’ is elevation differece between the surface of

the water and the centerline of the pump impeller. ‘Lift’ can be

either ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ depending on the actual

configuration in which the pump is running.

• Sump surface above the pump lift is positive

• Sump surface below the pump lift is negative

WATER

Lift = 20.5 ft

Page 18: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

The pump impeller requirements are a function of the flow rate of

the individual pump. The higher the flow rate, the greater the

NPSH requirement. The NPSH curve the the Oconee Sump

Pump is shown below. At maximum expected flow (1000 GPM),

NPSHR is approximated to be 8.6 FT abs.

Page 19: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

The friction losses in the pipe were an unknown for this pump.

While significant data exists for friction losses in steel pipe,

losses in PVC pipe and fittings is not readily available. Also, due

to the size of the pipe (6 inch) the flow velocities (12 ft/sec) are

much higher than recommended (5 ft/sec).

Based on estimates for friction losses, we knew that we would

be near the limit of NPSH at the 1,000 gpm flow rate. This is

why the actual test was required to determine for certain that the

sump pump would perform as required.

Page 20: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Net Positive Suction Head Available vs. Required

FSRUG

SUMMARY:

The final equation for NPSH is as follows:

NPSHa > NPSHr

Atmospheric Pressure > Lift + Impeller Requirement + Friction

Losses

33.9 ft > 20.5 ft + 8.6 ft + Friction Losses

33.9 ft > 29.1 ft + Friction Losses

Therefore Friction Losses must be less than 4.8 ft in order for the

pump to perform its intended function.

What we learned in the first test is that the friction losses in the

suction line achieve 4.8 ft when the flow rate goes above

approximately 950 gpm. Therefore, any flow rate below this will

have sufficient NPSH for the pump to perform its intended function.

Page 21: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Test Pit: Maximum Attainable Flowrate at Duplicated

Suction Condition

FSRUG

Page 22: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump: Inadequate NPSHA Performance

FSRUG

Page 23: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Foot Valve Head Loss Curve: Simmons 8” Valve

FSRUG

Page 24: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Suction Piping: Friction Losses

FSRUG

- 6” Sch. 80 Pipe: 1000 GPM, 12.5 FPS, Friction

Loss (7.2 FT / 100 FT)

- 7.2 / 100 = X / 20, X = 1.44 FT

- Limits:

- Steel Pipe, 8 – 12 FPS

- PVC Pipe, 5 FPS max (Wear, Noise)

Page 25: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Discharge Piping: Friction Losses

FSRUG

- 6” Sch. 80 Pipe: 1000 GPM, 12.5 FPS, Friction Loss

(7.2 FT / 100 FT)

- Unit 3: 7.2 / 100 = X / 500 FT, X = 32.4 FT

- Unit 1: 7.2 / 100 = X / 1100 FT, X = 79.2 FT

- Limits:

- Steel Pipe, 8 – 12 FPS

- PVC Pipe, 5 FPS max (Wear, Noise)

Page 26: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump Predicted Performance Test Curve

FSRUG

Page 27: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump Skid Assembly

FSRUG

Page 28: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump Skid Assembly - Finished

FSRUG

Page 29: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Impeller

FSRUG

Page 30: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump Foot Valve Assembly

FSRUG

Sized a Vortex Breaker Plate

Plate Diameter Still Fit Thru

30” Access Manway

Added Drain Valve to Allow

Quick Opening from Outside

Pit, Emergent Draining of

Water (250 lbs), and Removal

of Suction Piping System

Valve – Leather Flapper

Page 31: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Suction Piping

FSRUG

Page 32: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Suction Piping Joints, Fittings, Zero Leakage

FSRUG

Page 33: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Suction Piping Joints, Fittings, Zero Leakage

FSRUG

Page 34: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Test Pit: Suction Piping Mock Up of Field Configuration

FSRUG

Page 35: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Test Pit: Suction Piping Mock Up of Field Configuration

FSRUG

Page 36: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Test Pit: Suction Piping Mock Up of Field Configuration

FSRUG

Page 37: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Test Pit: Maximum Attainable Flowrate at Duplicated

Suction Condition

FSRUG

Page 38: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Sump Pump: Inadequate NPSHA Performance

FSRUG

Page 39: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Field Configuration:

- Suction Pipe

- Fill & Vent Connects

- Manway Cover Positioned

for Installation in an

Emergency

- Limited Access Thru 30”

Manway

FSRUG

Page 40: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Field Installation: Discharge Piping

FSRUG

Page 41: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Unit 1: Pump Flowrate Achieved

FSRUG

Page 42: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Field Installation: 30” Manway Access

FSRUG

Page 43: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

In-Leakage: Dumping Right on Top of Foot Valve

FSRUG

Page 44: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

In-Leakage: View from Turbine Building Bottom Floor

FSRUG

Page 45: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

In-Leakage: View from Turbine Building Bottom Floor

FSRUG

Page 46: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

In-Leakage: Video from Turbine Building Bottom Floor

FSRUG

Page 47: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Oconee Unit 3: Sump Pump System Configuration

FSRUG

Page 48: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Oconee Unit 3 Inspections: Sump Pump Performance

Highlights

FSRUG

- Allowed for Inspections of Circulation Water Piping

- Unwatering Circulating Water Inlet Piping: X Gallons

- Discharge Piping Length of Run: 450 FT

- Capacity: 750 GPM In-Leakage, 900 GPM Maximum

- Discharge Piping 10 FT Sections: Zero Leakage

- 6” Discharge Piping Material: PVC

- Discharge Returned Water Back to Lake Keowee

Page 49: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Oconee Unit 1: Sump Pump System Configuration

FSRUG

Page 50: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Oconee Unit 1 Inspections: Sump Pump Performance

Highlights

FSRUG

- Allowed for Inspections of Circulation Water Piping, Water

Box Valves, and an Amertap System Modification

- Unwatering Circulating Water Inlet Piping: 3,542,000 Gallons

- Discharge Piping Length of Run: 1,100 FT

- Capacity: 400 GPM In-Leakage, 880 GPM Maximum Pumped

- Discharge Piping 10 FT Sections: Zero Leakage

- 6” Discharge Piping Material Changed from PVC to

Aluminum.

- Material Change Relieved Fire Watch Requirements, as the

Piping is Routed Thru Operating Units (2 & 3).

- Discharge Returned Water Back to Lake Keowee

- Chemistry Department did not have to Manage 3.5 Million

Gallons of Water Thru Chemical Treatment Ponds

Page 51: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

Oconee Unit 1 Inspections: Pump Lost Prime 3 Times

FSRUG

- Pump Prime was Lost One Time as a Result of Low Water Level

- Water Wave Generating a Vortex

- Scaffold Builder Bumped Dump Valve, Opening Valve

Page 52: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

SOURCE REFERENCES:• Centrifugal Pumps: Design & Application, Lobanoff and Ross

(practical application)

• Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps, Stepanoff (theory)

• Centrifugal Pumps, Gülich

• Vertical Turbine, Mixed Flow & Propeller Pumps, Dicmus

• Centrifugal Pump Handbook, Sulzer

• Pump Handbook, Karassik

• Centrifugal Pump Clinic, Karassik

• Centrifugal Pumps Selection & Operation, Karassik

• Centrifugal Pumps, Karassik

FSRUG

Page 53: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

FSRUG

Gene Cernan, Last Man on the Moon, Dead at 82 – R.I.P.

Page 54: Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin, TX …fsrug.org/Presentations2017/5.pdf · 2017-02-01 · Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2017) Austin,

THE (HAPPY) END

QUESTIONS ?

FSRUG