ferric citrate - thomas land · 2015. 2. 20. · the ferric ion has limited absorption through the...

Hospital Pharmacy 139

Formulary Drug Reviews

Ferric Citrate

Dennis J. Cada, PharmD, FASHP, FASCP (Editor)*; Jasen Cong, PharmD†; and Danial E. Baker, PharmD, FASHP, FASCP‡

*Founder and Contributing Editor, The Formulary; † Drug Information Resident, College of Pharmacy, Washington State Univer-sity; ‡Director, Drug Information Center, and Professor of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University Spokane, PO Box 1495, Spokane, Washington 99210-1495. The authors indicate no relationships that could be perceived as a conflict of interest.

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are tar-geted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A compre-hensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available on-line. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. A drug class review is now pub-lished monthly with The Formulary Monograph Service. Through the cooperation of The Formu-lary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The February 2015 monograph topics are netupitant/palonosetron, naltrxone SR/bupropion SR, nintedanib, pirfeni-done, and ivabradine. The Safety MUE is on netupitant/palonosetron.

Generic Name: Ferric citrate Proprietary Name: Auryxia (Keryx Biopharma-

ceuticals) Approval Rating: 5 (new formulation or new

manufacturer) Therapeutic Class: Phosphate binders Similar Drugs: Calcium acetate, calcium car-

bonate, lanthanum carbon-ate, sevelamer hydrochloride, sevelamer carbonate, sucro-ferric oxyhydroxide

Sound-or Look-Alike Names: Ferric gluconate, ferric sub-

sulfate, ferric carboxymaltose

INDICATIONSFerric citrate (KRX-0502) is indicated for the

reduction of serum phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis.1,2

Absorption of dietary phosphate occurs in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and excess phosphorus

is normally excreted in the urine.3 Additional phos-phate regulatory mechanisms include increases in parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) to inhibit renal absorption of phosphate.4 Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a decreased ability to excrete phos-phate, which can result in hyperphosphatemia.3,5-7 Decreased 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol production and dietary calcium absorption can also occur with decreased renal function.6 Potential complications as a result of these events include the development of CKD-associated mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD), extraskeletal calcification of soft tissue, and increased risk of mortality.3,5,6-8

In addition to dietary phosphate restriction and dialysis, current therapies to lower serum phosphate act by binding phosphate in the gut prior to absorp-tion.3,5 Such products include aluminum hydroxide, calcium-based binders, lanthanum and sevelamer products, and iron-based phosphate binders. How-ever, each of these products has specific disadvantages. Long-term aluminum hydroxide therapy can result in accumulation and aluminum toxicity. Calcium-based

Hosp Pharm 2015;50(2):139–1512015 © Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.www.hospital-pharmacy.comdoi: 10.1310/hpj5002-139

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 139 2/10/15 4:54 PM

140 Volume 50, February 2015


binders, such as calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, and calcium citrate, can lead to hypercalcemia and metastatic calcification. Noncalcium-based binders, such lanthanum and sevelamer products, may bind to other medication and increase patient medica-tion costs. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a recently approved iron-based phosphate binder in the United States.3,5,6-8 Iron deficiency may also be present with CKD due to factors such as use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), repeated blood sampling, or hemodialysis. As a result, iron supplementation is used to reduce the severity of anemia in patients with CKD. The intravenous (IV) route is preferred for patients, especially those on hemodialysis, with oral iron as an alternative option in nondialysis patients.3

As per their special protocol assessment, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals has completed 2 phase 3 clini-cal trials designed to support regulatory submis-sion for drug approval.9 Outside of ESRD dialysis patients, a phase 2 trial reviewing ferric citrate for serum phosphate reduction and iron-deficiency ane-mia in patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD has been completed.10-12 A phase 2 pilot study, expected to be completed in October 2014, is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ferric citrate for iron deficiency anemia in stages 3 to 5 nondialysis-dependent CKD patients.13 Under a sublicense from Keryx Biophar-maceuticals, a separate product in Japan designated

ferric citrate hydrate has been developed by Japan Tobacco, Inc. and Torii Pharmaceuticals, Co.4,8,14-17

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Iron-based phosphate binder complex binds with

phosphate within the GI tract over a wide pH range, which leads to increased phosphate excretion in the feces and decreased phosphate absorption.3 In normal and azotemic rats, ferric citrate increased fecal phosphate excretion and decreased intestinal phosphate absorption. Table 1 provides a comparison of mechanisms of action and elemental content of select phosphate binders. The phosphorus-binding capacity of ferric citrate was estimated to be approximately 84.8 to 87.9 mg of phosphorus per gram of elemental ferric iron and 19.1 to 19.8 mg of phosphorus per gram of ferric citrate.18 In comparison, 180 mg of phosphate is estimated to be bound by 1 g of aluminum, 40 mg of phosphate bound by 1 g of elemental calcium (as calcium carbonate), and 100 mg of phosphate bound by 1 g of elemental calcium (as calcium acetate).18 Studies in human subjects have observed similar reductions in serum phosphate with ferric citrate as calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, and sevelamer carbonate.19-21

As an iron-containing product, several trials have suggested ferric citrate has a potential to increase iron-related parameters, including serum iron, ferri-tin, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and

Table 1. Comparative mechanism of action and elemental content of phosphate binders used to treat hyperphosphatemia6,17,18,45,49

Drug Mechanism of action Elemental content

Calcium acetate Forms insoluble calcium phosphate by binding to dietary phosphate

169 mg of elemental calcium per 667 mg of calcium acetate

Calcium carbonate Forms insoluble calcium phosphate by binding to dietary phosphate

400 mg of elemental calcium per 1,000 mg of calcium carbonate

Ferric citrate Binds to dietary phosphorus to increase fecal excretion and decrease intestinal absorption

210 mg of elemental ferric iron per 1,000 mg of ferric citrate

Ferric citrate hydrate Binds to dietary phosphorus to increase fecal excretion and decrease intestinal absorption

62 mg of iron as an anhydride per 250 mg of ferric citrate hydrate

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide Exchange of ligands between dietary phosphate and hydroxyl groups and/or water from sucroferric oxyhydroxide

500 mg of iron per 2,500 mg of sucroferric oxyhydroxide

Lanthanum carbonate Forms insoluble lanthanum phosphate by binding to dietary phosphate

Sevelamer carbonate Interacts with intestinal phosphate through ionic and hydrogen bonding to decrease absorption

Sevelamer hydrochloride Interacts with intestinal phosphate through ionic and hydrogen bonding to decrease absorption

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 140 2/10/15 4:54 PM



total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), as well as to potentially decrease the dose requirements or usage of IV iron and ESA.5,7,20-28

PHARMACOKINETICS The ferric ion has limited absorption through the

GI tract.29 Ferric citrate reduces serum phosphorus in a dose-dependent manner. During a 28-day treatment period, ferric citrate at fixed doses of 1, 6, and 8 g/day produced a difference in serum phosphorus from end of therapy to baseline of −0.1, −1.9, and −2.1 mg/dL, respectively. In this study, a dose-response relationship was also observed for other lab parameters, such as cal-cium phosphorus product, ferritin, and bicarbonate.5

Ferric citrate hydrate is described to have a larger surface area and faster dissolution rate than ferric citrate.8,15,16

COMPARATIVE EFFICACYIndication: Hyperphosphatemia in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis Three Times Weekly

Guidelines Guideline: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initia-tive (KDOQI) clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in CKD

Reference: National Kidney Foundation, 200330 Comments: Stage 5 CKD patients unable to control serum phosphorus or PTH with dietary phosphate restriction are recommended to start a calcium-based or noncalcium-, nonaluminum-, nonmagnesium-based phosphate binder. Daily limits of elemental calcium provided by calcium-based binders should not exceed 1,500 mg, and elemental calcium from all sources should not exceed 2,000 mg. Calcium-based phosphate binders should be avoided in hypercalcemic patients (eg, corrected serum calcium greater than 10.2 mg/dL) or patients with PTH less than 150 pg/mL. Dialysis patients failing to achieve serum phosphate of less than 5.5 mg/dL with a single calcium-based or noncalcium-, nonaluminum-, nonmagnesium-based phosphate binder may initiate a combined therapy with these 2 agents. Dialysis patients presenting with severe vascular or calcification of soft tissue should initiate therapy with noncalcium-based phosphate binders. Four weeks of aluminum-based phosphate binders followed by other binders thereafter may be considered in patients with serum phosphorus greater than 7 mg/dL. Consideration of increased dialysis time or frequency (4 times weekly

or more often) should be given in patients with serum phosphorus greater than 7 mg/dL, uncontrolled on phosphate binders, or unable to tolerate phosphate binders. Ferric citrate is not mentioned in this version of the guidelines.

Guideline: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Out-comes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of CKD-MBD

Reference: KDIGO CKD-MBD Work Group, 200931 Comments: Hypophosphatemia treatment in CKD patients stages 3 to 5, including stage 5 requiring dialysis, consists of dietary phosphate restriction, phosphate binders, and increased dialysis. Main-tenance of serum phosphorus and calcium within normal range is recommended in CKD stages 3 to 5. Serum phosphorus toward a normal range and cal-cium within normal range is recommended for stage 5 CKD requiring dialysis. Preference toward a specific phosphate binder is not expressed in these guidelines. The recommendation for selecting a particular agent is based on CKD staging, complications of CKD-MBD, and medication adverse effects. Guidance regarding appropriate use of specific agents includes restriction of calcium-based phosphate binder dose (and potentially calcitriol or vitamin D analogues) in patients with recurrent/persistent hypercalcemia. Reduction of calcium-based binder dose is also rec-ommended in patients with arterial calcification, ady-namic bone disease, or persistently low serum PTH. The use of long-term aluminum-based phosphate binders should be avoided during CKD stages 3 to 5. CKD patients requiring dialysis or unable to tolerate phosphate binders are recommended to increase fre-quency or duration of dialysis to reduce serum phos-phate. Additional recommendations regarding dialy-sis include a dialysate calcium concentration between 2.5 to 3 mEq/L and avoidance of aluminum dialysate contamination. Brief commentary on tolerability of ferric citrate is mentioned in this version of the guide-line; however, a place in therapy is not stated.

Studies Drug: Ferric citrate

Reference: Dwyer JP, et al, 20135 Study Design: Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial Study Funding: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 141 2/10/15 4:54 PM



Patients: One hundred fifty-four adult patients randomized (79.2% completed) with ESRD on hemodialysis 3 times a week and taking 3 to 15 pills of a phosphate binder daily (calcium ace-tate 667 mg or sevelamer 800 mg per pill). Study included patients with a serum ferritin level less than 1,000 mcg/L, TSAT less than 50%, serum phosphate between 3.5 to 8 mg/dL at screen-ing, and serum phosphorus of 6 mg/dL or more after 2 weeks of washout. At baseline, the intent-to-treat (ITT) population ranged from 52.8 to 56.5 years of age and 57.8% to 64% were male; 50% to 60.8% of patients were Black and 13% to 21% were White. Baseline laboratory parameters included mean phosphorus of 7.3 to 7.6 mg/dL, mean ferritin of 515.2 to 558.2 mg/dL, and mean TSAT of 29.8% to 33.8%. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to ferric citrate 1, 6, or 8 g/day. Ferric citrate was provided as 1 g caplets containing ferric iron 210 mg taken at meals or within 1 hour of eat-ing. Following a 1- to 2-week washout of pre-vious phosphate-binder therapy, patients were provided 28 days of therapy. Patients discontin-ued therapy if serum phosphorus was 2.5 mg/dL or less at day 7 or was outside the range of 2.5 to 9 mg/dL on days 14 or 21. Permitted con-current therapies included vitamin D, vitamin D analogues, and cinacalcet held at constant doses. Calcium supplements were to be taken at bedtime or 2 hours outside of mealtime. IV iron therapy was allowed for patients with serum ferritin of 1,000 mcg/L or less and TSAT of 50% or less. The ITT cohort included randomized patients with a baseline and postbaseline assessment. The safety cohort included patients receiving at least 1 study medication dose. Results Primary Endpoint(s) • Regression analysis confirmed a dose-response

change in serum phosphorus from baseline (P < .001).

Secondary Endpoint(s) • Compared with baseline, ferric citrate 1, 6, and

8 g/day decreased serum phosphate by a mean of −0.1 mg/dL, −1.9 mg/dL, and −2.1 mg/dL, respectively, at day 28 in the ITT population.

• Mean difference in change of serum phosphate from baseline of 1 g/day versus 6 g/day was 1.3 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.9; P < .001).

• Mean difference in change of serum phosphate from baseline of 1 g/day versus 8 g/day was 1.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.86 to 2.1; P < .001).

• Mean difference in change of serum phosphate from baseline of 6 g/day versus 8 g/day was 0.21 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.39 to 0.81; P = .5).

• No statistically significant dose response was observed for calcium or TSAT.

• A statistically significant dose response was observed for ferritin. Change in ferritin from baseline to day 28 was −14.4 mg/dL, 90.1 mg/dL, and 90.2 mg/dL for ferric citrate 1, 6, and 8 g/day, respectively.

Comments: This trial was conducted across 15 sites in the United States. A total of 22 patients (15.1%) were considered treatment failures by day 28 due to serum phosphorus being 2.5 mg/dL or less (7 patients) or serum phosphorus 9 mg/dL or more (15 patients). High serum phosphorus was seen more often in the 6 and 8 g/day cohorts, and low serum phosphorus was seen more often in the 1 g/day cohort. Limitations: This study may have limited applica-bility in patients with active GI bleeding, inflam-matory bowel disease, parathyroidectomy in the past 6 months, hyperphosphatemia of 10 mg/dL or more, and a history of malignancy in the past 5 years since they were excluded from participation.

Drug: Ferric citrate versus active control Reference: Umanath K, et al, 2013; Lewis JB, et al, 20146,20,21,25-28,32-37 Study Design: Phase 3, randomized, 3-period, inter-national, multicenter trial Study Funding: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Patients: Four hundred forty-one ESRD patients who were 18 years and older on 3 times weekly hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis taking 3 to 18 pills of a phosphate binder daily. Study included patients with a serum ferritin level less than 1,000 mcg/L, TSAT less than 50%, and serum phos-phate between 2.5 to 8 mg/dL at screening. Baseline characteristics of the ferric citrate and active con-trols arms in the safety period were similar. At base-line, the ferric citrate arm of the safety period had a mean age of 54.9 years and 62.7% were male; 52.7% of patients were Black and 42.5% were White. In this cohort, mean ferritin was 594 mg/dL, TSAT was 30.9%, and hemoglobin was 11.6 g/dL. Intervention: Patients with serum phosphorus of at least 6 mg/dL after up to 2 weeks of washout were randomized 2:1 to ferric citrate or active control

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 142 2/10/15 4:54 PM



(calcium acetate 667 mg and/or sevelamer carbon-ate 800 mg) in a 52-week, open-label, safety assess-ment period. Ferric citrate was provided as 1 g caplets containing ferric iron 210 mg, and patients were started on 6 g/day titrated up to 12 g/day. Active control was provided at the dose used prior to washout and titrated to a maximum of 12 pills daily. Doses were titrated to achieve a normal serum phosphorus level of 3.5 to 5.5 mg/dL. Compliant patients taking 12 pills/caplets of assigned phosphate binder and serum phosphorus greater than 9 mg/dL were discontinued as treatment failures. In the safety period, 192 ferric citrate patients were re-ran-domized 1:1 ferric citrate or placebo in a 4-week, open-label, efficacy assessment period. Patients with serum phosphorus of 9 mg/dL or more during this period were considered treatment failures. Allowed concurrent therapies included IV iron preparations (for ferritin 1,000 ng/mL or lower and TSAT of 30% or lower), vitamin D, vitamin D analogues, cinacalcet, dialysate calcium concentrations, and ESA according to the treating physician. Calcium supplements were allowed if not taken with food. Results Primary Endpoint(s) • Ferric citrate decreased mean serum phospho-

rus from 5.1 mg/dL at week 52 to 4.9 mg/dL at week 56 (end of efficacy period) compared with 5.4 mg/dL at week 52 to 7.2 mg/dL at week 56 with placebo. The least squares mean treatment difference was −2.18 mg/dL (95% CI, −2.59 to −1.77; P < .001).

Secondary Endpoint(s) • During the 52-week safety period, mean serum

phosphorus decreased from 7.4 mg/dL at base-line to 5.4 mg/dL at week 52 with ferric citrate and from 7.6 mg/dL at baseline to 5.4 mg/dL at week 52 with active control. At week 52 of the safety period, 63% of 281 ferric citrate patients compared with 63.7% of patients achieved serum phosphorus of 5.5 mg/dL or less.

• During the safety period, ferric citrate increased serum iron from 72.6 mcg/dL at baseline to 88.4 mcg/dL at week 52 compared with serum iron remaining at approximately 69 mcg/dL throughout the safety period in active control (P < .001).

• During the safety period, ferric citrate increased mean serum ferritin from 593 ng/mL at base-line to 899 ng/mL at week 52 compared with

609 ng/mL at baseline to 628 ng/mL at week 52 for active control (P < .001).

• During the safety period, ferric citrate changed the mean TSAT from 31.3% at baseline to 39.3% at week 52 with ferric citrate compared with 30.9% at baseline to 29.7% active control (P < .001).

• During the safety period, TIBC changed from 233 mcg/dL at baseline to 227 mcg/dL at week 52 with ferric citrate compared with 225 mcg/dL at baseline to 235 mcg/dL at week 52 (P < .001).

• Median elemental IV iron use was 12.9 mg/week with ferric citrate compared with 26.8 mg/week with active control for a treat-ment difference of −52% (P < .001). In the last 9 months of the study, 42% of patients were off IV iron compared with 11% in active control.

• Median ESA use was 5,303 epoetin equivalent units per week with ferric citrate compared with 6,954 epoetin equivalent units per week with active control for a treatment difference of −24% (P < .04).

Endpoint(s) • Mean hemoglobin during the safety period

decreased from 11.6 g/dL at baseline to 11.4 g/dL at week 52 with ferric citrate com-pared with 11.7 g/dL at baseline to 11.1 g/dL at week 52 with active control (P < .05).

• During the safety period, serum cal-cium increased from 8.9 mg/dL at baseline to 9.1 mg/dL at week 52 with ferric citrate com-pared with 9 mg/dL at baseline to 9.3 mg/dL at week 52 with active control.

• In a subgroup analysis of the safety period, 74 patients taking ferric citrate who were not given IV iron over the 52-week period saw improve-ment in serum iron, ferritin, and TSAT at week 52 compared with baseline. In 207 patients pro-vided IV iron, improvements were seen in serum iron, ferritin, TSAT, and hemoglobin at week 52 compared with baseline. Between group differ-ences (IV iron vs no IV iron) at week 52 were not statistically significant.

Comments: This trial was conducted at 60 sites across the United States and Israel. In the safety period, 35 of 98 patients discontinued ferric citrate and 8 of 34 patients discontinued active control due to adverse events. In the efficacy period, 2 of 5 patients discontinued ferric citrate and 2 of 10 patients discontinued placebo due to adverse events.

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 143 2/10/15 4:54 PM



An open-label extension trial exposed 168 patients, who successfully completed the original 58-week study, to ferric citrate for an additional 48 weeks. Preliminary data over the 48-week period reported serum phosphorus ranging from 5.2 to 5.5 mg/dL (baseline, 5.7 mg/dL), TSAT ranging from 36% to 38% (baseline 32%), and hemoglobin ranging from 11.1 to 11.6 g/dL (baseline, 11.1 g/dL) over 48 weeks. Ferritin increased from 700 ng/mL at baseline to a maximum of 848 ng/mL at week 24 and dropped to 717 ng/mL at week 48. Mean monthly IV iron dose per patient was 32 mg/month, and weekly mean ESA dose per patient was 4,500 units per week. Approximately 69% of patients in this period did not require IV iron.38,39 Pharmacoeco-nomic analysis of similar data concluded that the use of ferric citrate may reduce the cost associated with anemia-management drugs, and total health care cost of these patients may be reduced.40,41 Limitations: This study may have limited applica-bility in patients with active GI bleeding or inflam-matory bowel disease, parathyroidectomy in the past 6 months, serum phosphorus 10 mg/dL or more 3 months prior to screening, and a history of malignancy in the past 5 years since they were excluded from participation.

Drug: Ferric citrate versus placebo Reference: Lee CT, et al, 20147 Study Design: Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Study Funding: Panion and BF Biotech Inc. Patients: One hundred eighty-three randomized patients (36 received placebo; 75 received ferric citrate 4 g/day; 72 received ferric citrate 6 g/day) who were 18 years and older on 3 times weekly hemodialysis and a stable dose of a phosphate binder. Included patients also had a urea reduc-tion ratio greater than 65%, hematocrit greater than 20%, and serum calcium between 8.5 to 10.5 mg/dL. Baseline characteristics of placebo and both ferric citrate groups were similar. At baseline in the ferric citrate groups, mean age ranged from 53.4 to 56.4 years, 56.9% to 62.7% were male, base-line serum phosphorus was 7 mg/dL, and average dietary phosphorus intake was 1,165 to 1,240 mg. Intervention: Patients with serum phosphorus between 5.5 and 10 mg/dL following a washout of previous phosphate binders for up to 2 weeks were randomized 1:2:2 to 8 weeks of placebo, ferric citrate

4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day. Ferric citrate was provided as 500 mg capsules containing ferric iron 105 mg. Patients were withdrawn from the study if they developed serum phosphorus of 9 mg/dL or more or TSAT of 55% or more. Stables doses of vita-min D analogues were allowed during the study, while iron-containing medications and oral and IV iron were prohibited. The efficacy cohort (166 patients) included patients with serum phosphorus measure-ment baseline and at day 14 or later. The safety cohort received at least 1 dose of study medication. Results Primary Endpoint(s) • Change of serum phosphorus from baseline to

week 8 was 0.08 with placebo and −1.6 and −2.27 with ferric citrate 4 and 6 g/day, respec-tively. Changes in serum phosphorus with the ferric citrate 4 and 6 g/day groups were both significantly greater than placebo. Change in serum phosphorus between the ferric citrate 4 and 6 g/day groups was also significantly dif-ferent (P < .001).

Secondary Endpoint(s) • Percentage of patients achieving serum phos-

phorus of 5.5 mg/dL or less at week 8 was 16.7%, 57.6%, and 74.1% with the placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day groups, respectively.

• Change in serum ferritin from baseline to week 8 was −41.75 ng/mL in the placebo group, 73.9 ng/mL (P = .008 vs placebo) in the ferric citrate 4 g/day group, and 103.4 ng/mL (P = .003) in the ferric citrate 6 g/day group.

• Change in TSAT from baseline to week 8 was −1.15%, 5.35%, and 4.95% in the placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day groups, respectively. Change in TSAT was not significantly different at either ferric citrate doses compared with placebo.

• Change in hemoglobin from baseline to week 8 was 0.35, 0.3, and 0.6 g/dL in the placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day groups, respectively. Change in hemoglobin was not significantly different at either ferric citrate doses compared with placebo.

• Change in bicarbonate from baseline to week 8 was −0.15, −0.6, and 0.45 mmol/L in the placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day groups, respectively. Change in bicar-bonate was not significantly different at either ferric citrate doses compared with placebo.

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 144 2/10/15 4:54 PM



• Change in serum calcium from baseline to week 8 was 0.17, 0.15, and 0.18 mg/dL with placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day, respectively.

Comments: Twenty-four placebo patients discontin-ued the study; most cases were voluntary withdrawal. Three cases were due to adverse events and 1 case was due to serum phosphorus greater than 9 mg/dL. Nine patients given ferric citrate 4 g/day discontinued treatment, with 2 cases due to adverse events and 1 case due to serum phosphorus greater than 9 mg/dL. Eighteen patients given ferric citrate 6 g/day discon-tinued treatment, with 7 cases due to adverse effects. Limitations: This study was conducted in 5 medi-cal centers in Taiwan; it was unspecified if this was the KRX-0502 formulation of ferric citrate. This study may have limited applicability in patients with GI abnormality, tertiary hyperparathyroid-ism, heart failure, diabetes mellitus with clinically relevant gastroparesis, unstable medical or psychi-atric conditions, clinically significant electrocar-diogram abnormalities, serum ferritin greater than 800 ng/mL, history of hemochromatosis, or active malignancy, except basal/squamous cell carcinoma, as these patients were excluded from participation.

Indication: Hyperphosphatemia and Iron Deficiency Anemia in Stages 3 to 5 Nondialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Guidelines Guideline: KDOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in CKD

Reference: National Kidney Foundation, 200330 Comments: In patients with stage 3 or 4 CKD, these guidelines recommend phosphate binders if serum phosphorus or intact PTH cannot be controlled with dietary phosphate restrictions with or without vitamin D therapy. Calcium-based binders are men-tioned as a potential first-line agent. Ferric citrate is not mentioned in this version of the guidelines.

Studies Drug: Ferric citrate versus placebo

Reference: Block GA, et al, 201410,11,12,42 Study Design: Phase 2 randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Study Funding: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Patients: One hundred forty-nine randomized adult patients (141 included in ITT cohort) with an esti-

mated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, serum ferritin 300 ng/mL or less, TSAT 30% or less, hemoglobin between 9 to 12 g/dL, and serum phosphorus between 4 and 6 mg/dL. Baseline demographics between ferric citrate and placebo groups appeared similar. The ferric citrate cohort at baseline was a mean age of 66 years, 31% were male, and 79% were White. Stage 4 CKD was the most prevalent (53%), followed by stage 5 (28%) and stage 3 (18%). Baseline laboratory values of this cohort included mean phosphate of 4.5 mg/dL, iron saturation of 22%, hemoglobin of 10.5 g/dL, ferritin of 116 ng/mL, intact FGF-23 of 159 pg/mL, 24-hour urine phosphate of 730 mg/ day, and estimated glo-merular filtration rate of 26 mL/min/1.73 m2. Intervention: Following a 2-week washout of phos-phate binders, patients were randomized 1:1 to ferric citrate or placebo for a 12-week treatment period. Ferric citrate was provided as tablets (elemental iron 210 mg each) 3 times daily with meals and titrated to 12 tablets daily for achievement of serum phospho-rus less than 3.5 mg/dL. Results were analyzed in the modified ITT cohort consisting of patients receiving 1 study drug and at minimum 1 baseline value with last observation carried forward for missing values. IV iron and ESA use were prohibited in the period leading up to and during the trial. Results Primary Endpoint(s) • Ferric citrate decreased mean serum phosphate

from 4.5 mg/dL at baseline to 3.9 mg/dL at week 12 compared with 4.7 mg/dL at baseline to 4.4 mg/dL at week 12 with placebo (P < .001).

• Ferric citrate increased TSAT from 22% at baseline to 32% at week 12, whereas TSAT remained unchanged at approximately 20% with placebo (P < .001).

Secondary Endpoint(s) • Mean hemoglobin increased from 10.5 g/dL

at baseline to 11 g/dL at week 12 with ferric citrate compared with 10.6 g/dL at baseline to 10.4 g/dL with placebo (P < .001).

• Mean ferritin increased from 116 ng/mL at baseline to 189 ng/mL at week 12 with ferric citrate compared with 110 ng/mL at baseline to 106 ng/mL with placebo (P < .001).

• Mean intact FGF-23 changed from 319 pg/mL at baseline to 200 pg/mL at week 12 with ferric citrate compared with 263 to 293 pg/mL with placebo (P = .017).

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 145 2/10/15 4:54 PM



• Mean C-terminal FGF-23 changed from 468 pg/ mL at baseline to 316 pg/mL at week 12 with ferric citrate compared with 511 to 579 pg/mL with placebo (P < .001).

Comments: This study was conducted in 20 sites across the United States. Statistically significant findings in both primary endpoints were prespeci-fied to consider the trial results as positive. Dis-continuation of ferric citrate occurred in 14 of 75 (19%) patients, with 1 case due to a hemoglobin less than 9 g/dL and 6 cases due to adverse events. Discontinuation of placebo occurred in 24 of 74 (32%) patients, with 9 cases due to hemoglo-bin less than 9 g/dL and 3 cases due to adverse effects. Limitations: Study results were only available as posters, meeting abstracts, and press releases from the manufacturer. This study may have limited applicability in patients with active GI bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, parathyroidectomy in the last 24 weeks, history of hemochromatosis, history of malignancy in the past 5 years, recent need for dialysis, or anemia due to causes other than CKD or iron deficiency anemia, as they were excluded from participation.

CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, AND PRECAUTIONSContraindications

Ferric citrate is contraindicated in patients with known iron overload syndromes (eg, hemochroma-tosis).1 Ferric citrate should be used cautiously in patients at risk of or presenting with hemochromato-sis. Part of the inclusion criteria used in ferric citrate studies included a serum ferritin less than 1,000 mcg/L and TSAT less than 50%.5,6 In 1 study, patients with a history of hemochromatosis or a serum fer-ritin greater than 800 ng/mL were excluded from participation.7

Warnings and Precautions Iron absorption from ferric citrate may lead to

excessive elevations in iron stores, as reflected by increases in serum ferritin and transferrin saturation levels.1 Additionally, clinical studies have reflected the potential of ferric citrate and ferric citrate hydrate to increase iron-related parameters follow-ing ferric citrate administration.4,5,7,17,20,25-27 A phase 3 clinical trial administering ferric citrate at 1, 6, or 8 g/day for 4 weeks noted significant dose response

with ferritin. Compared with baseline, serum ferri-tin at day 28 with 1, 6, and 8 g/day of ferric citrate changed by −14.4, 90.1, and 90.2 mg/dL, respec-tively.5 A 52-week safety period of a phase 3 study administering 6 to 12 g/day of ferric citrate com-pared the impact of iron-related parameters with calcium acetate or sevelamer carbonate. During this period, significant treatment differences with ferric citrate compared with active control were observed with serum ferritin, TSAT, hemoglobin, serum iron, and TIBC.20,25-27 A phase 3 study of ferric citrate in Taiwan noted increases in ferritin with 4 and 6 g/day of ferric citrate from baseline to week 8 compared with placebo.7 Assessment of iron parameters (eg, serum ferritin, TSAT) should occur prior to the start of the ferric citrate and be monitored through-out therapy.1

Ferric citrate is an iron-containing product and should be kept out of reach of children. Accidental overdose may occur with any iron-containing prod-uct and is the leading cause of fatal poisoning in chil-dren younger than 6 years.1

Patients should be provided counseling regard-ing the potential of ferric citrate to discolor the stool.43 Counseling should also convey the informa-tion that stool discoloration (dark/tarry stools) may also serve as 1 of the signs and symptoms of poten-tial GI bleeding.44 Stool discoloration was a com-mon adverse effect of ferric citrate recorded during clinical trials.5,7,33 In a 28-day phase 3 trial with ferric citrate, fecal discoloration was reported in 29 of 151 patients (19%).5 During the 52-week safety assessment period of a phase 3 trial, fecal dis-coloration was noted in 17% of 289 patients given ferric citrate compared with 0% of 149 patients given sevelamer carbonate or calcium acetate.33 In a phase 3 trial of ferric citrate conducted in Tai-wan, discoloration of stool was reported in 2 of 36 patients given placebo compared with 28 of 75 patients given ferric citrate 4 g/day and 27 of 72 patients given ferric citrate 6 g/day.7

Cautious use may be warranted in patients with a history or current GI disorders. In ferric citrate stud-ies, patients with GI abnormality, active GI bleed-ing, inflammatory bowel disease, or diabetes mellitus with clinically relevant gastroparesis were excluded from participation.1,5,7 A majority of adverse effects reported in clinical trials with ferric citrate and ferric citrate hydrate involved the GI tract. Some patients discontinued therapy with ferric citrate or fer-ric citrate hydrate due to treatment-related adverse effects that involved the GI tract.5,7,8,10,17,33,35

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 146 2/10/15 4:54 PM



Not enough information is available regarding the metabolic effects of alkali absorption of citrate.3 In a clinical trial administering ferric citrate at 1, 6, or 8 g/day for 4 weeks, a significant dose response was observed for bicarbonate. Compared with baseline, bicarbonate values at day 28 with 1, 6, and 8 g/day of ferric citrate changed by 0.1, 1.6, and 1.5 mEq/L, respectively.5 A phase 3 trial of ferric citrate in Taiwan did not observe a significant change of bicarbonate from baseline to week 8 between placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day groups. However, at week 8, the bicarbonate level was 23.75 mmol/L in the ferric citrate 6 g/day group compared with 21.8 mmol/L in the placebo group (P = .028).7 In a phase 2 trial providing ferric citrate 4.5 to 11.25 g/day for 4 weeks, an increase in bicarbonate from 22.2 mEq/L at baseline to 23.7 mEq/L at end of study was noted.29

Ferric citrate is classified as Pregnancy Category B; no adequate and well-controlled studies in preg-nant women have been conducted.1

Animal studies found some transfer of iron into milk; it may be possible for breast-feeding infants to be exposed to ferric citrate.1

Safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients.1

No known differences have been established between elderly and younger patients treated with ferric citrate.1

ADVERSE REACTIONSTreatment-related GI adverse effects (eg, diar-

rhea [21%], discolored feces, constipation [8%], nausea [11%], vomiting) were the most commonly reported across several clinical trials with ferric citrate.1,5,7,29,33,37

A phase 3 study administering ferric citrate 1, 6, and 8 g/day for 4 weeks noted the lower rate of adverse events in the 1 g/day cohort and similar rate in the 6 and 8 g/day cohorts. The rate of drug-related

adverse events, serious adverse events, or events lead-ing to discontinuation increased with the dose.5

In a phase 3 trial of fixed-dose ferric citrate, 91 of 151 events (60.2%) were graded as mild to moder-ate, with 53 of 151 events (35.1%) determined to be related to the study drug. The most common adverse effects in the study involved the GI tract and included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, fecal discol-oration, and upper abdominal pain.5

In a 52-week safety period of a phase 3 study, 289 patients were provided with ferric citrate 6 to 12 g/day, and 149 were provided active control (up to 12 tablets of calcium acetate 667 mg or sevelamer car-bonate 800 mg) over 52 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 90.7% of patients taking ferric citrate and 89.3% of active control patients. The GI tract was the most common system organ class reported with treatment-emergent adverse effects, which affected 56.4% of patients with ferric citrate and 46.3% of active control patients. Most of the GI treatment-emergent adverse effects were nonse-rious and occurred in 49.4% of ferric citrate patients compared with 34.2% of active control patients. Event rates of select GI adverse effects are shown in Table 2. Serious adverse effects occurred in 39.4% of patients taking ferric citrate and 49% of active con-trol patients (Table 3). A total of 19.1% of patients taking ferric citrate had a serum ferritin greater than 1,500 ng/mL compared with 10.1% of patients with active control. In both groups, IV iron administration was most frequently determined to be the causative factor, with 7.6% of the ferric citrate group compared with 4.7% in the active control group.33

Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation occurred in 21% of patients with ferric citrate compared with 14% with active control. The most common reasons for treat-ment discontinuation in both groups were renal transplant and GI events.1,33

Table 2. Select gastrointestinal adverse effects during a 52-week safety assessment period of a phase 3 trial33

Adverse effect Ferric citrate (n = 289)

Active control (n = 149)

Diarrhea 25.6% 14.1%

Fecal discoloration 17% 0%

Nausea 14.2% 14.1%

Vomiting 9% 14.8%

Constipation 8% 5.4%

Abdominal pain 6.2% 6%

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 147 2/10/15 4:54 PM



The most common adverse events in a phase 3 trial of 166 patients in Taiwan were related to the GI tract and were reported at 27.8%, 61.3%, and 58.3% of placebo, ferric citrate 4 g/day, and ferric citrate 6 g/day arms, respectively. The 2 most commonly treated related adverse effects across all cohorts were fecal dis-coloration and diarrhea. Fecal discoloration occurred in 2 patients with placebo and in 28 and 27 patients taking ferric citrate 4 and 6 g/day, respectively. Diarrhea occurred in 2 patients with placebo and in 5 patients and 3 patients taking ferric citrate 4 and 6 g/day, respec-tively. Adverse effects led to study discontinuation in 3 patients with placebo, 2 patients with ferric citrate 4 g/ day, and 7 patients with ferric citrate 6 g/day.7

DRUG INTERACTIONS Ferric citrate is an iron-containing product.1,5-7

Medications that may interact with iron, including, but not limited to, antacids, ascorbic acid, calcium salts, levodopa, levothyroxine, fluoroquinolones, tetracy-clines, and doxycycline, should be appropriately admin-istered separately or avoided with ferric citrate.45-47 Most drugs should not be administered at the same time as the ferric citrate dose. Medications that can be coadmin-istered with ferric citrate include amlodipine, aspirin, atorvastatin, calcitriol, clopidogrel, digoxin, doxercal-ciferol, enalapril, fluvastatin, levofloxacin, metoprolol, pravastatin, propranolol, sitagliptin, and warfarin.1

RECOMMENDED MONITORINGSerum phosphorus should be assessed at base-

line and monitored as often as clinically indicated throughout therapy with ferric citrate. In clinical

trials with ferric citrate, serum phosphorus was evaluated at various intervals that included weekly assessments; weekly assessment for the first 2 weeks, then every other week thereafter; or assessment every other week for 12 weeks followed by monthly there-after.5,6,7,10,37 Various criteria were utilized in clinical trials to determine discontinuation of therapy with ferric citrate. In 2 clinical trials, patients discontinued therapy or were considered treatment failures with ferric citrate if they had 2 consecutive serum phos-phorus measurements above 8 to 9 mg/dL.6,7 A third clinical trial discontinued ferric citrate therapy if patients had a serum phosphorus of 2.5 mg/dL or less on day 7 and a reading of 2.5 mg/dL or less or 9 mg/dL or higher on day 14 or 21.5

It may be advisable to assess baseline iron-related parameters and monitor them as often as clinically indicated with ferric citrate therapy. In 1 clinical trial, iron parameters were monitored at a minimum of every 12 weeks.6 Clinical studies have shown the potential of ferric citrate and ferric citrate hydrate to improve iron-related parameters, such as serum iron, ferritin, hemoglobin, TSAT, and TIBC, following fer-ric citrate administration.4,5,7,8,17,20,25-27,37

DOSING The recommended dose by the manufacturer is

2 tablets (ferric iron 210 mg per tablet; equivalent to ferric citrate 1 g per tablet) orally 3 times per day with meals. Patients should be instructed to take their other medications at a different time. The dose of fer-ric citrate should be adjusted based on the patient’s serum phosphorus levels. Decrements or increments

Table 3. Summary of the most common severe adverse effects occurring in 5% or more of patients during a 52-week safety assessment period of a phase 3 trial33

System organ class Ferric citrate (n = 289)

Active control (n = 149)

Infections and infestations 12.5% 18.1%

Surgical and medical procedures 7.6% 6.7%

Vascular 7.6% 9.4%

General disorders and administration site 7.3% 8.1%

Cardiac 6.9% 11.4%

Gastrointestinal 6.9% 12.1%

Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal 6.6% 8.7%

Injury, poisoning, and procedural 5.2% 6%

Metabolism and nutrition 5.2% 5.4%

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 148 2/10/15 4:54 PM



of 1 to 2 tablets per day, done at intervals of 1 week or longer, should be used to maintain the serum phos-phorus at target levels. The daily maximum dose is 12 tablets.1 The average dose required in the clinical trials to achieve the target serum phosphorus level was 8 to 9 tablets per day.1

PRODUCT AVAILABILITY A special protocol agreement was arranged with

the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to aid with phase 3 trials for regulatory approval of ferric citrate.9 The filing of a new drug application for ferric citrate was accepted by the FDA in October 2013.14 The initial Prescription Drug User Fee Act date was extended by 3 months in May 2014.48 Ferric citrate was approved by the FDA on September 5, 2014.2

The product is available as a film-coated tablet containing ferric iron 210 mg (equivalent to ferric citrate 1 g) in 200-count polyethylene bottles. The product should be stored at controlled room tem-perature 68°F to 77°F (20°C to 25°C) and protected from moisture.1

DRUG SAFETY/RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY (REMS)

No REMS is required for ferric citrate.2

CONCLUSIONFerric citrate is indicated for phosphate reduction

in ESRD patients on hemodialysis with hyperphos-phatemia. As part of the special protocol assessment with the FDA, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals completed 2 phase 3 trials to support the approval of this indica-tion. Two additional clinical trials with ferric citrate are currently being conducted in slightly different populations: hyperphosphatemia with iron deficiency anemia in nondialysis-dependent CKD patients, and iron deficiency anemia in CKD patients. In clinical trials funded by Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, 1 g of ferric citrate is estimated to provide approximately 210 mg of elemental iron. It is estimated that 85 g of phosphate is bound per gram of elemental iron. In addition to ferric citrate’s dose-dependent effect of serum phosphate reduction, secondary end-points in clinical trials hint at an additional benefit of an increase in iron-related parameters as well as a potential decrease in the need for parenteral iron or ESA. However, because of these potential effects on iron-related parameters, it may be advisable to appropriately monitor patients for prevention of iron overload. GI adverse effects were the most commonly

reported treatment-related adverse effects. Despite the results shown with ferric citrate thus far, most studies evaluated surrogate endpoints (eg, change in phosphate level) rather than hard endpoints (eg, vas-cular calcification, left ventricular hypertrophy, car-diovascular mortality, CKD progression, mortality in CKD).

REFERENCES 1. Auryxia (ferric citrate) [prescribing information]. New York: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals; November 2014.

2. Stockbridge N. FDA approval letter: Ferric citrate tablets (NDA 205874). US Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2014/205874Orig1s000ltr.pdf. Published September 5, 2014. Accessed September 8, 2014.

3. Nastou D, Fernández-Fernández B, Elewa U, et al. Next-generation phosphate binders: Focus on iron-based binders. Drugs. 2014;74(8):863-877.

4. Yokoyama K, Hirakata H, Akiba T, et al. Ferric citrate hydrate for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in nondi-alysis-dependent CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(3): 543-552.

5. Dwyer JP, Sika M, Schulman G, et al; Collaborative Study Group. Dose-response and efficacy of ferric citrate to treat hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: A short-term randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):759-766.

6. Umanath K, Sika M, Niecestro R, et al; Collaborative Study Group. Rationale and study design of a three-period, 58-week trial of ferric citrate as a phosphate binder in patients with ESRD on dialysis. Hemodial Int. 2013;17(1):67-74.

7. Lee CT, Wu IW, Chiang SS, et al. Effect of oral fer-ric citrate on serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [published online ahead of print May 20, 2014]. J Nephrol.

8. Yokoyama K, Akiba T, Fukagawa M, et al. A randomized trial of JTT-751 versus sevelamer hydrochloride in patients on hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(5): 1053-1060.

9. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals announces special proto-col assessment agreement with FDA for phase 3 registration program of Zerenex in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia [press release]. Keryx Biopharmaceutical Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1370711&highlight. Published January 5, 2010, Accessed November 13, 2014.

10. Block GA, Fishbane S, Wolf M, et al. Zerenex (ferric citrate coordination complex) for the treatment of iron-defi-ciency anemia and reduction of serum phosphate in non-dial-ysis dependent CKD [abstract]. Presented at: 2014 National Kidney Foundation Spring Clinical Meeting; April 23-26, 2014; Las Vegas, NV.

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 149 2/10/15 4:54 PM



11. Block GA, Fishbane S, Shemesh S, Sharma A, Chertow GM. Zerenex (ferric citrate) for the treatment of iron-defi-ciency anemia and reduction of serum phosphate in non-dial-ysis dependent CKD [abstract]. Presented at: 2014 National Kidney Foundation Spring Clinical Meeting; April 23–26, 2014; Las Vegas, NV. Abstract 423.

12. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals announces Zerenex (ferric citrate coordination complex) meets all pri-mary and key secondary endpoints in phase 2 study of non-dialysis dependent CKD patients with elevated serum phosphorus and iron deficiency anemia [press release]. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1872314&highlight. Published November 5, 2013. Accessed November 13, 2014.

13. Ferric citrate. ClinicalTrials.gov Web site. http://clinical-trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02128074. Published April 2014. Accessed May 29, 2014.

14. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals announces FDA acceptance for filing of Zerenex new drug application [press release]. Keryx Bio-pharmaceuticals Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1862465&highlight. Published October 8, 2013. Accessed May 29, 2014.

15. Iida A, Kemmochi Y, Kakimoto K, et al. Ferric citrate hydrate, a new phosphate binder, prevents the complications of secondary hyperparathyroidism and vascular calcification. Am J Nephrol. 2013;37(4):346-358.

16. Yokoyama K, Hirakata H, Akiba T, Sawada K, Kum-agai Y. Effect of oral JTT-751 (ferric citrate) on hyperphos-phatemia in hemodialysis patients: Results of a random-ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(5):478-487.

17. Yokoyama K, Akiba T, Fukagawa M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of a novel iron-containing phosphate binder, JTT-751, in patients receiving hemodialysis. J Ren Nutr. 2014;24(4):261-267.

18. Hsu CH, Patel SR, Young EW. New phosphate binding agents: Ferric compounds. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(6):1274-1280.

19. Yang WC, Yang CS, Hou CC, Wu TH, Young EW, Hsu CH. An open-label, crossover study of a new phosphate-bind-ing agent in haemodialysis patients: Ferric citrate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(2):265-270.

20. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. announces Zerenex phase 3 data presented at the 2013 World Congress of Nephrol-ogy [press release]. Keryx Biopharmacuticals Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1826253&highlight. Published June 3, 2013. Accessed May 29, 2014.

21. Lewis JB, Koury M, Schulman G, et al. Ferric citrate as a phosphate binder reduces IV iron and erythropoietin stimulat-ing agent (ESA) use [poster]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract TH-PO521.

22. Sika M, Sinsakul MV, Niecestro RM, Chiang SS. Pro-longed use of ferric citrate (FC) as a phosphate binder reduces IV iron use in pts with ESRD [abstract]. Presented at: 2010 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 16-21, 2010; Denver, CO. Abstract SA-PO2946.

23. Sinsakul M, Korbet S, Greene T, et al. Iron absorption with higher doses of ferric citrate in controlling serum phos-phorus in ESRD patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(4):A103.

24. Bond C, Jensen D, Wang S, et al. A meta-analysis of fer-ric citrate for hyperphosphatemia: the effects of an oral iron-containing phosphate binder on serum ferritin and saturated transferring in hemodialysis patients [abstract]. Presented at: 2012 49th ERA-EDTA Congress; May 24-27, 2012; Paris, France. Abstract SAP534.

25. Lewis JB, Dwyer JP, Koury M, et al. Ferric citrate binds phosphorus, delivers iron, and reduces IV iron and erythropoi-etic stimulating agent use in end-stage renal disease [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO542.

26. Middleton JP, Athreya BP, Ayodeji OB, et al. Ferric citrate, a phosphate binder, increases iron stores but is not associated with evidence of the malnutrition-inflammation-cachexia syn-drome [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meet-ing; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-OR083.

27. Umanath K, Blumenthal SS, Koury M, et al. Ferric citrate binds phosphorus, delivers iron, and reduces IV iron and ESA use in ESRD [poster]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO542.

28. Umanath K, Blumenthal SS, Sika M, et al; the Collab-orative Study Group. Ferric citrate as a phosphate binder reduces IV iron and erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract TH-PO521.

29. Sinsakul M, Sika M, Koury M, et al; Collaborative Study Group. The safety and tolerability of ferric citrate as a phosphate binder in dialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;121(1-2):c25-c29.

30. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4 suppl 3):S1-S201.

31. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guide-line for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treat-ment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int. 2009;(suppl 113):S1-S130.

32. Sika M, Kabani S, Chen M, et al. Oral ferric citrate (FC) eliminates the need for intravenous (IV) iron in dialysis patients [abstract]. Presented at: 2014 National Kidney Foun-dation Spring Clinical Meeting; April 23-26, 2014; Las Vegas, NV. Abstract 79.

33. Sika M, Umanath K, Goral S, et al. Keryx FC phase III safety thumbnail ferric citrate as a phosphate binder has a safety profile similar to sevelamer carbonate and calcium

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 150 2/10/15 4:54 PM



acetate [poster]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO540.

34. Umanath K, Sika M, Koury M, et al. Achieved iron stores and clinical outcomes in a trial of ferric citrate as a phosphate binder [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meet-ing; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO382.

35. Sika M, Umanath K, Goral S, et al. Ferric citrate as a phosphate binder has a safety profile similar to sevelamer car-bonate and calcium acetate [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO540.

36. Weiner DE, Sika M, Dwyer JP, et al. Impact of fer-ric citrate, an oral phosphate binder, on mineral and bone metabolism markers in dialysis patients [abstract]. Presented at: 2013 ASN Kidney Week Meeting; November 5-10, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Abstract SA-PO543.

37. Lewis JB, Sika M, Koury MJ, et al. Ferric citrate controls phosphorus and delivers iron in patients on dialysis [published online ahead of print July 24, 2014]. J Am Soc Nephrol.

38. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals provides update from ongo-ing Zerenex (ferric citrate coordination complex) long-term safety extension study in patients with hyperphosphatemia on dialysis [press release]. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1874366&highlight. Published November 8, 2013. Accessed May 29, 2014.

39. Ferric citrate. ClinicalTrials.gov Web site. http://clinical-trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01554982. Published March 2012. Accessed May 29, 2014.

40. Thomas A, Peterson LE. Reduction of costs for anemia-management drugs associated with the use of ferric citrate. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:191-201.

41. Mutell R, Rubin JL, Bond TC, Mayne T. Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: A managed care cost-offset model. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2013;6:79-87.

42. Ferric citrate in managing serum phosphorus and iron deficiency in anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects on dialysis. ClinicalTrials.gov Web site. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01736397. Published November 2012. Accessed May 30, 2014.

43. Ghosh AK. Efficacy of ferric citrate as a phosphate-binding agent in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(7):1354; author reply 1354.

44. Bleeding in the digestive tract. National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse. National Institutes of Health Web site. 2010. http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/bleeding/bleeding_508.pdf. Published July 2014. Accessed November 13, 2014.

45. Phosphate binders; iron-products. Drug Facts and Com-parisons. Facts & Comparisons [database online]. St. Louis, MO: Wolters Kluwer Health Inc; 2014. Accessed June 5, 2014.

46. Levothroid (levothyroxine sodium) [prescribing infor-mation]. Shenandoah, IA: Lloyd Pharmaceutical; September 2005.

47. Doryx (doxycycline hyclate) [prescribing information], Rockaway, NJ: Warner Chilcott; July 2013.

48. Keryx receives notification of PDUFA date extension for Zerenex [press release]. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Web site. http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1933836&highlight. Published May 22, 2014. Accessed May 29, 2014.

49. Velphoro (sucroferric oxyhydroxide) [prescribing infor-mation]. Waltham, MA: Fresenius Medical Care; December 2013.

17_hpj5002137_151.indd 151 2/10/15 4:54 PM


Hosp Pharm 2015;50(2):152–1532015 © Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.www.hospital-pharmacy.comdoi: 10.1310/hpj5002-152

Continuing Education Case Study Quiz

Goal—The goal of this activity is to educate pharmacists about the use of ferric citrate for the treat-ment of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Objectives—At the completion of this activity, the reader will be able to:1. Describe the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of ferric citrate.2. Discuss the risks associated with the use of ferric citrate.3. Discuss the potential benefit of ferric citrate for an individual patient.4. Apply the information on the use of ferric citrate to a case study.

Key Words—ferric citrate, new drugs, chronic kidney disease, dialysis

This CE activity is co-sponsored by ProCE, Inc. and Hospital Pharmacy. ProCE, Inc. is accredited by the Accredi-tation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education. ACPE Universal Activity Number 0221-9999-15-032-H01-P has been assigned to this knowledge-based home-study CE activity (initial release

date 02-01-2015). This CE activity is approved for 1.5 contact hours (0.15 CEUs) in states that recog-nize ACPE providers. This CE activity is provided at no cost to participants. Completion of the evaluation and the post-test with a score of 70% or higher are required to receive CE credit. No partial credit will be given.

Faculty: Dennis J. Cada, PharmD, FASHP, FASCP (Editor), Founder and Contributing Editor, The For-mulary; Jasen Cong, PharmD, Drug Information Res-ident, College of Pharmacy, Washington State Univer-sity; and Danial E. Baker, PharmD, FASHP, FASCP, Director, Drug Information Center, and Professor of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University. The authors indicate no relation-ships that could be perceived as a conflict of interest. This activity is self-funded by Hospital Pharmacy.

Release Date: February 1, 2015Expiration Date: February 1, 2017Continuing Education for this activity is pro-

cessed through the ProCE online CE Center. To receive CE credit, please go to:

• www.ProCE.com/HPJFDR• Click to access the activity page to enroll and complete the Post-Test and Evaluation

For questions related to register-ing for and obtaining CE credit, contact ProCE at 630-540-2848 or [email protected].

1. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved indication for ferric citrate is for the treatment of:a. Adult and pediatric patients with iron defi-

ciency anemia.b. Adult patients with macrocytic anemia.c. Adult patients with elevated serum phospho-

rus associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis.

d. Adult and pediatric patients with elevated serum phosphorus associated with CKD not requiring dialysis.

2. Ferric citrate produces its serum phosphorous lowering effects by:a. Binding dietary phosphorous to increase

fecal excretion.b. Forming insoluble calcium phosphate complex.c. Exchanging ligands between dietary phos-

phate and hydroxyl groups.d. Forming ionic and hydrogen bonds with

intestinal phosphate.

18_hpj5002152_153.indd 152 14/02/15 12:33 AM


Continuing Education Case Study Quiz

3. Ferric citrate contains how many milligrams of elemental ferric iron per 1 g of ferric citrate?a. 210 mgb. 248 mgc. 400 mgd. 500 mg

4. Which of the following is a contraindication to therapy with ferric citrate?a. Low serum ferritin b. History of gastrointestinal disordersc. Known iron overload syndromed. Concomitant acid-reducing medications (eg,

H2-blockers, protein pump inhibitors)

5. Ferric citrate is in Pregnancy Category:a. A.b. B.c. C.d. X.

Case HistoryB.B. is a 62-year-old obese female patient with

hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. Her current medications include lisinopril, diltiazem, sitagliptin, glipizide, and paroxetine. Her physician has just diagnosed her with end-stage renal disease and has decided to start her on dialysis. Her current laboratory values of note include phosphorous of 7.5 mg/dL, ferritin 180 mg/dL, and transferrin saturation of 35%. Her physician thinks she may benefit from the use of ferric citrate.

6. The recommended initial dose of ferric citrate for B.B. would be:a. 1 g three times daily.b. 4 g per day in divided doses.c. 2 g twice daily.d. 2 g three times daily.

7. How many tablets make up the maximum rec-ommended dose of ferric citrate for B.B.?a. 6 tabletsb. 8 tabletsc. 9 tabletsd. 12 tablets

8. B.B. should be instructed to take ferric citrate:a. On an empty stomach.b. With meals.c. Three times daily with or without food.d. Every 3 days, after dialysis.

9. Which of B.B.’s medications can be taken con-comitantly with the ferric citrate?a. Lisinoprilb. Sitagliptinc. Diltiazemd. None of the above

10. Which of the following potential options for the treatment of urinary tract infection may be administered with ferric citrate?a. Ciprofloxacinb. Levofloxacinc. Doxycyclined. None of the above

11. What baseline and periodic monitoring would you recommend for B.B.’s ferric citrate therapy?a. Serum phosphorous and iron parametersb. Serum phosphorous and corrected calciumc. Serum creatinine and corrected calciumd. Serum creatinine and serum uric acid

12. The most common side effects associated with ferric citrate include: a. Nausea, headache, and pruritus.b. Nausea, headache, and diarrhea.c. Diarrhea, nausea, and constipation.d. Vomiting, rash, and abnormal liver function

tests.

13. At what interval should you adjust B.B.’s dose of ferric citrate?a. Every 3 days as neededb. No more frequently than every weekc. No more frequently than every 2 weeksd. Daily until at the maximum dose.

14. B.B. has been taking ferric citrate for 6 months and has recently been experiencing postpran-dial fullness and bloating. Her physician has diagnosed her with diabetic gastroparesis. What action is recommended?a. Reduce the dose of ferric citrate by half.b. Reduce the dose by one fourth.c. Monitor her more closely.d. Increase the dose by one fourth.

15. Ferric citrate should be stored:a. Only in the original container.b. In the refrigerator and protected from moisture.c. In the freezer and protected from light.d. At controlled room temperature and pro-

tected from moisture.

18_hpj5002152_153.indd 153 2/10/15 7:25 PM

ferric citrate - thomas land · 2015. 2. 20. · the ferric ion has limited absorption through the...

Documents