ff t3 c - nrc

10
~ * ' ~ ' RELATED CORRESPO!G5CE '! * ,0! 'yei t ~ - DOCMETED USNRC * * 5 [5 26 PiiO3 ' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ghf NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g,p e r T m ', ~ , ' . ' ' , In the Matter of ) ' ) COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-454 ) 50-455 (Byron Nuclear Power Station, ) ' 3 bW Units 1 and 2) ) ' ) ff 4 / T3 m B ggBle c h,. Oc12 es u i - -p.g55 MOTION OF ROCKFORD LEAGUE OF /g g WOMEN VOTERS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS N O The Rockford League of Women Voters, ("the League"), by its attorneys, moves the Commissien pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 2.720(f) to quash the Deposition Subpoenas of Richard B. Hubbard and Gregory C. Minor set to commence in San Jose, California on October 28, 1981. The grounds for this Motion are as follows: 1. These depositions were set without consultation with counsel for the League and, despite efforts to arrive at a compromise, counsel for Commonwealth Edison Company refuses in good faith to discuss discovery, instead - ; wanting unfairly to engage in one-sided conversations beneficial only to | Commonwealth Edison. See Rockford League of Women Voters Motion for Sanctions and Response of Rockford League of Women Voters to Motion for Sanctions on file with the Commission and dated October 13, 1981. See also Letter to Michael I. Miller, Esq. from Myron M. Cherry dated October 21, 1981 and attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4 9 1 c, eh , t Ohk4 jjfg{$h P o P - _ - - .

Upload: others

Post on 05-Apr-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

~* ' ~ '

RELATED CORRESPO!G5CE

'!*

,0! 'yeit

~-

DOCMETEDUSNRC

**

5 [5 26 PiiO3'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ghfNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g,p

e r T m ', ~ , ' .' '

,In the Matter of )

' )COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-454

) 50-455(Byron Nuclear Power Station, )

'

3

bWUnits 1 and 2) )

'

)ff

4

/ T3m B ggBle ch,. Oc12

es ui-

-p.g55MOTION OF ROCKFORD LEAGUE OF /g g

WOMEN VOTERS TO QUASH SUBPOENASN O

The Rockford League of Women Voters, ("the League"), by its attorneys,

moves the Commissien pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 2.720(f) to quash the Deposition

Subpoenas of Richard B. Hubbard and Gregory C. Minor set to commence in San

Jose, California on October 28, 1981. The grounds for this Motion are as follows:

1. These depositions were set without consultation with counsel for the

League and, despite efforts to arrive at a compromise, counsel for

Commonwealth Edison Company refuses in good faith to discuss discovery, instead -

; wanting unfairly to engage in one-sided conversations beneficial only to|

Commonwealth Edison. See Rockford League of Women Voters Motion for

Sanctions and Response of Rockford League of Women Voters to Motion for

Sanctions on file with the Commission and dated October 13, 1981. See also

Letter to Michael I. Miller, Esq. from Myron M. Cherry dated October 21, 1981

. and attached hereto as Exhibit A.491 c, eh

, t

Ohk4 jjfg{$hPoP

- _ - - .

_

,

.

..

. -

2. It is also unclear as to whether or not the subpoena is requiring

deponents to testify on matters not relevant to issues in the proceeding. .For

example, Commonwealth Edison opposes and refuses to provide discovery on

certain of the League's Contentions, yet it is engaging in discovery oi' the

League's potential experts on those very issues.

3. Commonwealth Edison is also refusing to pay the . reasonable

. expenses of the deponents for the taking of the depositions (c.1though it has

offered to pay deponents for the time of the taking of the deposition). The~

deponents in order to answer questions will have to prepare and review

information for some days prior to the depositions, yet Commonwealth Edison is

refusing to pay those expenses even though Edison's attorneys, Isham, Lincoln &

Beale, fought and lost before the NRC the very same issue in connection with

the very same witnesses in the Black Fox proceeding. See Order on taking of

. depositions of MHB Technical Associates, Black Fox proceeding.

4. In addition, the setting of the depositions is inconvenient to the

witnesses and to counsel for the League for a variety of reasons:

a. The depositions require on short notice the gathering of

multitudes of '>cuments without an opportunity for the League to

consult with MHB Technical Associates;

b. Commonwealth Edison did not tender (notwithstanding 'its

| statements in its application to the Chairman) the fees for the!

reasonable services of MHB Technical Associates as required by!i Commission Rules of Practice. -Rather, Commonwealth Edison in

defiance of its representations to the Board simply _ tendered a $30.00|! check to the deponents. See Letter from MIIB Technical Associates to;

!>

| -2-

|

I. - ... - . . - . . _ . L - , . - . - - -. - .. - _ - - - - . - . :: : ~

.

'.

e

-.

League's Counsel dated October 12,1981, an'd attached- hereto as Exhibit

B; see also MHB's Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and a

xerox of the checks tendered to deponents attached hereto as - Exhibit1

D;

c. The ' depositions were set without consultation with the

League's principal counsel who has just '.ecently. finished a trial lasting|

through all of August and most of September preceding which counsel

. as engaged in over five months of depositions. Moreover, counsel forw

the League is getting married November 8, plans for which have been

set some time and no courtesies have been extended even on that score

by Commonwealth Edison's counsel; and'

d. The depositions were set in California, the most inconvenient

place for the parties in this cause and under the circumstances if the

depositions are to take place in California, Commonwealth Edison should

be required to pay the League's expenses for their lawyer to attend (or

alternatively set the depositions in Chicago to that it is overall less

expensive for all the parties).

!

5. These series of depositions scheduled are intended solely for

harassment and the product of a lawyer's knee-jerk reaction to a November 1,

1981 discovery cut-off date rather than the product of reasoned analysis in a good

faith manner.l

!

-3-

|t

i

!_ - - , _ . , _ . - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _, .. - - ,, , . . . - , _ _ . _ _ , .

r

-

..

*

.

..

WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated herein (as well as the reasons

stated in the Rockford League of Women Voters Motion for Sanctions and

Response of Rockford League of Women Voters to Motion for Sanctions which are

incorporated herein) Commonwealth Edison's Subpoenas directed against Richard B.

Hubbard and Grcgory C. Minor of MHB Technical Associates should be quashed

and reset only after consultation and upon just and reasonable terms, including

fair payment tc MIIB Technical Associates and requiring that the depositions be

held in Chicago unless Commonwealth Edison pays League's counsel's cxpenses.1

Respectfully,

OCKFORD LEAGUE OF WOM'EN VOTERSN\

By: / . / /b"O'ne f Their Attorneys

Myron M. CherryPeter FlynnCHERRY & FLYNN, p.e.One IBM Plaza, Suite 4501Chicago, IL 60611(312) 565-1177

/

1. Despite all the rancor, the League's counsel is perfectly willing to discusssettlement of this discovery dispute including the resetting of these depositions onreasonable notice. But discovery is a two-way street and the arrogance ofCommonwealth Edison and its counsel must cease or this proceeding will become ashambles. In addition, the League is filing a Motion to reset the discovery schedulefor good reasons and thus there should be no reason why just discovery byCommonwealth Edison will not take place.

.

-4-

. . - . - _ ____- , _ _ _. _, _ - , - _ _._

: % #

*.

'e,

.

,

LAW OFFICES,

,

C H E' R R Y & F LY N N, p.c.ONE fBM PLAZA

CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 6 0611_

ula) ses-t:77

October 21, 1981

_BY P me .

Michael I. Miller, Esq.Isham, Lincoln & Beale

One First National PlazaForty-Second FloorChicago, Illinois 60603

Re: Rockford Imague of Wcraen Votersv. Ocnnonwealth Edison 02npany

Dear Mike:

A few mcments ago you called my office wanting to discussdepositions in the NPC case which you had scheduled without anymnsultation with me, or for that matter any other party to the NBCproceeding. I told you, among other things, that I was not interestedin discussing one-sided discovery but would be more than willing todiscuss the whole question about outstanding discovery in the NPCcase, as well as the ICC case (which your associate Mr. Murphy hadonce agreed to but then breached), and you refused to do so.

I am quite disappointed in the manner of your representation,but I cannot in good conscience agree to one-sided bargaining.

Accordingly, I intend to inform the Board by Motion thatthese Inatters should be resolved in an appugiate manner under theRules.

& sin ely,

i 10

f h / VVMyre d. Cherry

ar/dn -

EXHIBIT A.

. - . - ,.%. .. - . - .- , ,. . . _ , , __r -y

.-

An* * Q TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ON ENERGY & THEENVIRONMENT

TECHNICAL ASSOClATES-

.

WW4

Date G. Bridenbaugh " ' " ' " " ^ ' ' " " ' ' " ' ' ' "October 12, 1981Richard B. Hubbard San Jcse, Caldornin 95125

Gregory C. Minor Phone:(408) 266-2716

Mr. Peter Flynn, Esq.CHERRY, FLYNNOne IBM Plaza. Suite 4501Chicago, IL 30611

SUBJECT: Subpoenas - Byron Nuclear StationhRC Docket Nos. 50-454 and 50-455

Dear Peter:

MHB was served with the attached three sub-poenas from Commonwealth Edison (Isham, Lincolnand Beale) on October 12. Accompanying the sub-poenas were three (3) checks for $30 each.

As Greg and you have discussed in the pas t,we should obtain ILGB's payment in advance forthe deposition and documents in accordance withthe standard MHB rates as set forth in the July1, 1981 MHB rate schedule. Let's also discussthe need per 10CFR 2. 720(f) to submit a motionto quash.

Yours very truly,

MHB TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES

du[A '[ I M6Richard B. Hubbard

RBH:ma

Enclosures

.

DOIIBIT B

~

ASRR Q TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ON ENERGY & THE ENVIRONMENT

7~ECHNICAL ASSOCIATES.

9IWW

oate a encecaur COMPENSATION SCHEDULE '123 "amaton ^ venue-Suite x

Schard B. Hubbard San Jose, Caldornia 95125

Gregory C. Minor Phone: (408) 266-2716

THE COMPENSATION AND MANNER OF PAYMENT TO MHB TECHNICAL ASSOCI ATESFOR ITS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SHALL BE AS SET FORTH BELOW:

PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT:

e INCLUDES NORMAL OFFICE SUPPORT, $ 480.00 PER MAN-DAYPHONE, AND UP TO TWO-COPIES OFMHB-PREPARED REPORTS. THISRATE WILL ALSO APPLY TO TIME AS $ 2,400.00 PER MAN-WEEKEXPERT WITNESS (DIRECT TESTIMONY,DEPOSITION, OR SUPPORT IN CROSS-EXAMINATION) IF PART OF AN MHBSTUDY. RATES FOR SHORT-TERMEXPERT WITNESS SERVICES WILL BEQUOTED ON REQUEST.

ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT:

e INCLUSIVE OF OFFICE SUPPORT. $ _(HOURLY RATE)=

_

ANNUAL SALARY X 1.252.5 X 2000

_

TECHNI CAL TYPING:

e FOR REPORTS, TESTIMONY AND $ 18.00 PER HOURAFFI DAVI TS .

DIRECT EXPENSES:

e A L, LIVING REPRODUCTION TO BE BILLED AT COSTPE R P AGE , COMP UTER.

|CHARGES, UNUSUAL LONG DISTANCEPHONE EXPENSES, SHIPPINGCHARGES, AND SUBCONTRACTEDSE RVI CES .

ABOVE RATES BASED ON AN EIGHT-HOUR DAYJ PARTI AL DAYS TO BE BILLED ATPRO-RATA HOURLY RATES. SERVICES PROVIDED ON HOLIDAYS AND WEEKENDSWILL BE BILLED AT ABOVE RATES. SERVICES TO BE BILLED MONTHLY WITHPAYMENT DUE 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF BILLING. A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1-1/2PERCENT PER MONTH ON THE OVERDUE BALANCE WILL BE ASSESSED ON ALL PASTDUE ACCOUNTS. ADVANCES OR RETAINER PAYMFNTS SHALL BE APPLIED AS ACREDIT AGAINST THE FINAL BILL FOR SERVICES. THIS COMPENSATIONSCHEDULE IS EFFECTIVE THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1981,

DATE ISSUED: 7/1/81 ,

EXHIBIT C

_

!*.

1

.

.

-

EXHIBIT D-

....-,7, .p. ., _q. ..,,..er .. - ,,- n. .n.. q..q ..,,...n. _n. ,i y ~ ,- ,, .., . n. ., ~,._,,., . ~.. . .,_- . r.n. ..n. ,,..,p ,t ...... ... .- . t t. . .. . . _

MlS.,i .,4-;1F-lF iSHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE li ~}[~p w,i._ ..- li-!F iF, ."F,;) E;ll i. bib;jir. ,. . p n ... , , , . . .p .- ,,- 9.yi.-; ,n i..n.,g.3 .f 3..q-.

,l 7-

T_2. '_! . h ;;l f."p'l L-[}.' '.',COUNSELO.R. S. ,AT LAW. '.J.if' b/| { .I.'j'{;I b-[lI'i Lh ", r'.h.*h;. -. . , . i . I .'."t Q ~. ?, J b; ]l f- s . | . .t ". ."W. ; ' ' j iS f 4 2.4 7. 3 C"- b '. . " -Y H'U. . N, .'.II., r ' b.

~

j..p ..;..g,.1

. - h. . c1 1 {. ,.

, J ~ ; j'; ' g/' fL{20 CONNECTI, CUT A,VE..- N.p p,, , r j ; L ' ;"; "i[;' p' ' ' ;]f Q*~|. L ; {|' . " I p { { ; } R 15-52! .

.>

-

. ,

,r' '

';1 r;.,-] p a r; .l p ;,, , j c;p h p f. ] j ;WASHINGTON. 0.C: 20036,p}F'Orl 'j 41p ip hi {ip 4 5 mr 9

' { - *' . p,-) r. ,p "-|J.c. p ' j p.F.1 p q p F;a}ci f c; pt] p.p [,ui p .. p A p. r . ,ig|'13 ,t ;;f;' g -.:i

;

? i .7}[JJ.lf yl1F.'. E- - - . Octobe C - J igB.l_'7p1y.'.[. i G J i

i

~ -4

7;[' ' ' ' T E L = *[,. ,r.:in;3 q. paip . ir 4. ni n. . g._~1 F- 2. ....; ;i c i: . y .; , . .- . . ;;c g. .;1 -

; PAY TO THE ~ RICHARD * B .c HUBB ARD c- rMr a r .ir;y.y p _ p. i r; cir-.a p'.[. ; . .g.:ntr.;tr].1rt r c i r. . r.;- U - | ~] p ;'[. ;. t . p :r:c,-

. . -

' F -i :p ap'.r. i ~ .c ~ m = ' au t : -- -- - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - | $ '. 3 0 : 0 0 :- ' ' 'm " -; -

.onogn op -j

.-. , 7. p. tf.. . .Thirty ' and 0 0/10 0 -- r- g4[c;p A m . ,t % J 'J.B. i.. .- i. l.. r. t j . . H - Q. i -- t- p q. .. f , . 0 -- , , E':r'. -l ..-in t 4. > p :.ti- g-.,:

-,

.-- 7; - ~ ' i .. ' ' ' 'n.; .

- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y - d J H . . 'p ' t m '. ; 6, .., ,- c' -

.

coLLAas'. i p.!Pi14; .i. m e -- - - -

papi ,n: r= s rirunaF"Fa! rxsap or ir!fHp-1[HF.b'i-!F-+m'u. 1. ,; ca . . i r . ' : 4. ~ ;;; !; iG : it;;NS&T BANK;;ananp.-o.ap,.p.c.;p :;. .,rD Mp.:

,

a F:ir",ian- v ia :

4i- h r ipi

d in 4 a p.-i F y fl J 0.1r'

m , i w i n.,w.4,,,, .e.,,, c.,,,t,'c '[u1 P- 7 F; p_ . j p,d", p. r*>"' v ' p - p . --Q a .4 .lF21EJ.

-: -

.w,% e.i..na.os tion E .hr.c.. ipa: .7 enm - H y.' a -F.c. i ;r:

- "' -

P- . c H;./1ptM, "ZML Ah" -a i.J' r.. ,

1-.. .n ._

Witness fee-for.dep. r %r -- 2 P2c, ,.

-held'on '* G . A 'i..Commomealbh'I' [".4 % .<. M _A d./ ,fr1/H" 'c i4- do " 7-29.Oct 81 in San Jose / TCA'...Re: MA _

Ison Co/Byr POO 2 4 7 3ndi:0 5 4000 5 2 28:;jFjo 5 7m L L 509 9 V'4WFrH %'i fi 4 .

:t:: n :: U..,ji.*.'.,t.".H.t t P Rr* p 4 W ~ t r. y. -:V LI G".J C J ' la L':H::li:. .J C. O ' . 1: ';J r : m. .J t .

. T.. L,. L. W.. w ' n.;Lp; 3 -. ; .t--

.- . -| ri . y-..n .t... r. .c .-y..r n.+ i t . - p..- .q. q.. .- _ - , ". .. ,..

. - . - .

.q____

i . p . . F. j r

- d .- Ul"l .41.. p. n .- . b 4 ! . . s i- : - q . y . p p . q . , [ . .. q . . , ; .. t .,j,.g ..;,..:p.,g ,. q.. p ,..

,, .

-p" P,.L.p ,',p--!g.FISHAM, LINCOLN &.BEALE.F}q. F,2.j F,I;.j,. .l{M.g {ll,J ,;f;p"..,',H.J 1F)JU..;.R.%. [?,7 [4|.. b 'J.|.:, p' .F.a'i. br..m.g'. i.ta i[:- .' U.,-2'4 7 4 :. i".-1 Fl i M,p. a l ..

, - 1 . .H . re c.j >. l. ,1.rlC. OUNSELORS A. T LAW h^~ 1"~ l* ,J ("q ,, "['.f.|. q',,U,.. !p!. "p p*~ h,,.J . ., .. , , ' t ', p' * : c . +.. ., , ,

,J - -.

c, . 1 pq,. , r.a .. ' 3,p.. p; p.1,20 CO.NNECT.ICUT AV.E..i N.W'm,SHINGTON 0.g20008 g, a.p., t pr H,;p,3p.,;;E,p 4r., p tp ) -1

.

,lp-7 p '. p-. y19 - October a n a 'g .;'f'81 m c g 1., g ' p q = , . ;, ; g , F F, h,,.4 ~., i . . . . , . a .g' .is.s2 ~id .n

.r..-.-

r-,.l,, . r. +, ...gy;q J.-,., F; .R,J. y., p. ..,

.e<

E.a -...

p'., p .- m 'c-

,- . 1 -- -- - .-

ip. w ci# p, rl F-. E,E.,p p .1

; '

.a p-ir-,ip,F#31E php;L:::-

r;J;q n c-,_

yLi

Fu-] p- ~y t .] p -i r pp a p;i p' C p,* y" p c;[._F E,1 p a n a p' p;i.b '9 q;4)a[]24.q pE %p.;1 p'4.,- <.H..;1 p ] p' P.i pq p ;a p'.F: t. . . pq p. . p,l .'r39

' a p,. 4 F '-]P p;;E.;p "a p c: . .; I- 1..1 F. ,- 1 1F 1 ,u-- -H > nt .r..

4. ,, p> b-r- q - p *:q2 j .-; p;' r!. . . [; 1. pay , e: =,,, .

PAY TO THE iC " -' "~ J 1 ~Ce 7r'J!rf- i'.1 .cH' 1r Mf. C pac T t! ,r v ._,onoEn or c' GREGORY, Cv-MINO2 c lG----- .-------------------------- l :. $ 3 0 ..C O p ; . ; p ; p, ;:-

am .

cF. .y -- : ri y--W.ip-. ; :--;p:;p. j ; ya;;ip',;;p;;y ci ; u .:n-N.. ThirtSIa5007130.1M;p'EYJ IWF.p'Eq;c.y;.ar. cip qF'W. q-.p.,.iFa p:.1p-q- a. ,e"l~q.pc-n:;

. ..

CM-- M . W .U N 3 -jl?y ~F. ..r. d.. ;

J i-.cou.ARS1p h- 4- - -

:paiplaE"y;q[N' S6rTJBA< K:;3dpt- tMn ;; .01 pad,h;,;g;e;q:_m;pqpap apc;p2y. jr-

'

- Qpc ..r.9E-1FaF.4*;h --u u no c.N u.ji..aH=iry:pc:E ,p ] rap cur : palp p[.- d-,e,h; .;p .b: :. ;p 1r: n

- m p. F ,,e .p.,,p. m,p-,p.c. m,p.,r. i-li Fw=+w.nSa-m ra r.p's e c !a p - e m =.n.,e.-mW G. 1 H - a E -..rmF-

:7 - , F-! D' i " 'a F ' 'EY@, $5YF ' F 'a Fm F :. b . O ? L & U W[ x pAb..;pp imaep.;1p j:r:ar;;;i v- .,

IFWitnsssf fee for depositidiC6n'2910ct 81~ 'FlF r- Ge r.1p;1 .

]Fonin % nA Y W I W C E rdNn U h W 3 & Cb;75A 6 .

Byron Stati.o. n n'. O 2.4'.?.4n.'.m. .:O 5 4 0 0.0 5 '2!2.i:j,,6._ 0 E7.7 L L 5 0 9 9 4 n' u_ [A. l_e!..4...F . P,,.H. :4..I. d,, .a.. F, ,G,

M, . .

. r.H " ' L :J trJ t'lln it ;& J er;j t .J um.. ir. a. lp ,a n. 4 a ". r ." p' n. g_e- , t o r. .. r_ ._v w..~ .3.~. ..,. r . n ' .-. .

.

. n - , t . -- . . f . . .y . . p q . . q . ., p q . .,y . y. . .q . . i . n. . . n ~.o . - < , . .o . o -- n ~ ? - " - n . t 3 -" ! --" m - '. .

.. . . -. . -. - . , " -' ~

.+ .. . .. q 4 a .,- .c i ... n .. y n- .

,i. :,i.+ ,...o..,.. -

. ISHAM, l.lNCOLN & BEA. .LE~ p"'t y.. n-r._.q..,.;p u p a. p.;p pe:p.i.p. c:p 4,;p .j F'2 4 7 2 - 2;> i , ,l F.J' '; ' ,i F. . b d ' C.OUN. .SELO. RS A. T .L. AW 711,~p' U ..d h.4.2-a F.,a. y 7,l. .*] r;d ' '.f i

. .

t,7 t4p** b~q' ' I .

. - . , Y,,;.1 p.7 <: q p y p;q; .~M U'..lC Ji p. J; p 1 r#r 4'' p" ij p 'j[,.I ''p J'4 .f. 'H* .

- - . , .

- - g *"-*4 ' c i li P'" h._ . , l-

.

t-,

* ~ ~ - 4 '"vJ i'' * '

; r'."l p; p.1, .K{}. -] 11,20 CONNECTICUT ,AVC.n, N ,W -*

; '. y. : ) i~

, c f',-[. l - q y, j';, j' g i;;;,,g,47p p,g g| 2 *',.,,s. ,

p p;f q. s p ;;r||j p.1r;..;!. .j, ' ' - . y ;.,. ; J g , p. i t . fi[.- 640 : 'I

:.q . ; {. ~ ll.]p;e. ] p . . WASHINGTON, D C. 2CO36, p g {;,. 4.,g:/1p . a'71.p' 9 . r p' p a.e n .. p.:1 n . n : .'. i c.:4 r t.1 p..! p:1papap .- q1:g. V ~4 October ' ' mig 81

7 . 4 r.! h .4-

c ir. q]M~ r... r! q p ;' r;. v;h wer1 M p' p r p cyi a r.aphpapig qp ':i: yhp 1- r a h ,- ~ .' l ' H.. y l p t J H" p /:l b '

-. . ,n o. e

IC ' '- '. f j p!1 t.2r r'- a r Mpc .-g . y

i t !2" '' ' N ' r' l i t'. C ' G q p ; y Cr a r.mt.

- i f- . , - ,- - . - * F li l i'!

'

' ~ l-

ORDER OF ., DATT ' G . ' R RTDENB AUGM '.''n1---.l -[. li2 - :-- ;-- --- --- .:i- - ----U-- -- - - | $ .10 : O n - '' '

. PAY TO THEi:,

'l '

7. ..p.. . . # ., v.g..q. n .n 3 a. g p

.r ..p "c . c. . . g r , ....;,.....q,0 0 /10 n ----- p ;p. ,q,~ , .- 9..m . q .- - - - .- - - - - d - - ; n . . .

..; ,

; t..u.., u;1 p. ' p q., c.; r. p. r.: .p ;t p . ; -< ,' jiThir,ty g .. . .. ,. nnd ,.

- --- --------- ; DOLLARS. a p ] h 2 i b ' ' p - d1 .c - n n .n. a!..u -q[L y J ii a p m '

u! pci p .i.p : p] t; F)-[: H; . . q . p: . u . ;; gar. ;p p, c q..y.ap ~1pcip :p G+.+H e

-

,

N 1 p t p . q.. . .r. y (7-r-U p: p. p 'l b i p - Ql '-l b . H ~ l p' p ; : p V H ..y . . ; G

e;!

, . :r.. :p o r;f . im. n.;.c ,,n ~c p.f ir cy]r? ld o. 'p j p ip h p ~ p . p: p A rd MZ il-7 F i F:~U .t p]',r~t.n r 'y a p r'T!D?l I- d- T - i iF- F-lI in .ir: a .SF .gr.i 1pW. ;j p ap. H. 7. a n; - w s .o.c.ms ; c

- - , - -

'. p . a r.J:" v.' . r!; . y

c; r. -m . m>r rWitness . fee :r - .. -for-deposit. ton to be he 7.. i r. : .r. .gi t ";,v:- M:n + l..q..;p r.; ~

rmmmmealth q.. gar *a* WM* *%%# r_";y $, ,-A.rJM '**

. N.. r."

FOR,29-.Ocb 81_m-San jaccf g % . .tw -

Erlison C+Byrom'.OO 2 4 7 2n'. -::0 5 4000 5 2 21: n O 5 7m L 1509 9 4n' ' ' - # R' U'

. ._ _.. _ . . . ..

h.-=*- -- we-o .-.em. -e-.goa,w.e.el 6- - _

.

j ..

-

.

. .

PROOF OF SERVICE,

The undersigned, one of the attorneys for the Rockford League of

Women Voters, certifies that he filed an original and two copies of the attached

pleading with the Secretary of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served a

copy of the same .on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal . Board herein, all'

counsel of record and the official service list by United States mail, postage

prepaid, this 23rd day of October,1981. In addition, counsel for all parties were

notified by telephone of the filing of this Motion and in addition to the mail

service a copy was delivered by- messenger to counsel for CommonwealJh Edison.K' | |'

/// / f, Y f

t/ * Myron M. Cherry ~'l:

4,

; -

... . .

- >.. ,

,

.

SERVICE LIST

Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Dr. A. Dixon CallihanAtomic Safety and Licensing Union Carbide CorporationBoard Panel P.O. Box Y

Washington, D.C. 20555 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Dr. Richard F. Cole Mr. Steven C. GoldbergAtomic Safety and Licensing Ms. Mitzi A. YoungBoard Panel Office of the Executive

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Legal DirectorWashington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555

Paul M. Murphy, Esq. Secretary:Isham Lincoln & Beale Atten: Chief, Docketing and

One First National Plaza Service Section -

Chicago, Illinois 60603 Washington, D.C. 20555

Ms. Betty Johnson Dr. Axel Meyer1907 Stratford Lane Department of PhysicsRockford, Illinois 61107 Northern Illinois University.

DeKalb, Illinois 6 0115

.

- --._,_. _ w.,

9 -gg s.# 3 1s e , - i_.m. - .-r-.,y-- _y,, , ,,