fidelity at tier ii
TRANSCRIPT
Monitoring Fidelity of Tier II Interventions
Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD
University of Oregon
http://coe.uoregon.edu/ipbs
TIER I: Core, Universal
2
2
• Intervention is for ALL students
• Effective if at least 80% of
students are meeting benchmarks
TIER I: Core, Universal
3
At least 80% of
students are
successful…what
about the rest?
3
TIER III: Individualized
4
4
TIER II: Supplemental, Targeted
5
Core +
Supplemental
5
Does intervention…
1. Match needs of child (target, intensity)
2. Get implemented with fidelity
3. Result in significant growth for most students?
Considerations
Simply “having” Tier I doesn’t guarantee
teachers are implementing it & “at risk
students are getting it
“At Risk” students need proactive behavior
management
Before implementing a Tier II support, ask
yourself…
Considerations
Simply “having” Tier I doesn’t guarantee
teachers are implementing it & “at risk
students are getting it
“At Risk” students need proactive behavior
management
Before implementing a Tier II support, ask
yourself…
Considerations
Simply “having” Tier I doesn’t guarantee
teachers are implementing it & “at risk
students are getting it
“At Risk” students need proactive behavior
management
Before implementing a Tier II support, ask
yourself…
Fidelity of Implementation
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Without Data….
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Were data
collected?
YES NO
Are goals being
met?
•Problem solve data
collection—determine
how to get data
•Collect data for 2 weeks
and reconvene
•Celebrate and continue
•Have plan for fading
Is plan being
implemented as
designed?
YES NO
•Modify intervention
•Consider move to next
level
•Problem solve barriers to
implementation
•Collect data and reconvene in 2
weeks
YES NO
C Anderson U Oregon March 2010
Fidelity of Implementation
Was intervention implemented as intended?
Fidelity in schools
Rarely if ever measured….
Monitoring Fidelity
Modalities
Qualitative report/narrative
Indirect assessment/self monitoring
Direct observation by another
Frequency
Steps to Monitoring Fidelity
1. Define key features of intervention
Feature
When it should occur
Who should implement
2. Develop checklist to record presence of component
3. Determine when monitoring should occur
Sample Fidelity Tools
Student Recommended for CICO
CICO is Implemented
CICO Coordinator summarizes data
for decision making
Exit program
Bi-weekly coordination Meeting to assess student
progress
Parent feedback
Regular teacher feedback
Afternoon check-out
Morning check-in
Revise program
Key Components/Times to
Monitor Times to monitor
Morning check in
Afternoon check out
Teacher feedback sessions
Who should assess fidelity?
Check in and out: Observer or coordinator
Classroom components: Teacher
Overall: Students
Morning Check In
Afternoon Check Out
Using Fidelity Data
Was intervention implemented as intended?
Data point out questions to ask—answers
guide approach to intervention
Feedback/Coaching Tips
Empathy
No assumptions
Feedback sandwich
Big problems require big solutions in baby steps
Fly-by coaching
Feedback/Coaching Tips
Empathy
No assumptions
Feedback sandwich
Big problems require big solutions in baby steps
Fly-by coaching
Morning Check In
Afternoon Check Out
Building Capacity for
Monitoring Fidelity 1. Begin with most frequently used Tier II
intervention
2. Identify key features of intervention
3. Determine modality for monitoring fidelity
4. Develop checklist(s)
5. Identify coaches for feedback
6. Determine schedule for monitoring
Want Help?
www.pbis.org
http://coe.uoregon.edu/ipbs