Passive Bistatic Radar

Figure 1. Bistatic and multistatic radar geometry configuration

Passive Bistatic Radar (PBR)

RT

TXRX

T’X

RR

L

Bistatic Radar: The transmitting and receiving antennas are not co-located.

Air traffic control/detection – important for being able to detect outer-atmospheric phenomena.

Detect ionospheric disturbances Remotely sense auroral turbulence, density

irregularities in the E and F regions of ionosphere, and meteor trails [1].

Traffic monitoring (law enforcement)

PBR Applications

FM radio broadcasts - monitor disturbances in the ionoshpere

Digital Audio Broadcasts (DAB) – high transmission power ~ 5 kW and wide bandwidth ~1.54 MHz

Analog TV broadcasts Global Positioning Satellites Cellular telephones

Illuminators of Opportunity

PBR Performance ExampleParameter Value

Transmit ERP (PTGT) 4 kW (CP); 250 kW (Wr)

Receive Antenna Gain (GR)

8 dB

Wavelength (λ) 3 m

Assumed Bistatic RCS (σB)

20 m2

Receiver Bandwidth (B) 200 kHz

Receiver Noise Figure (Fn)

6.8 dB

Assumed System Losses 10 dB

Baseline Length (L) 11.8 km (CP); 37 km (Wr)

Integration Time (Tint) 1 s

Effective Bandwidth (Beff) 75 kHz

Processing Gain (GP) 48.8 dB

Table 1. Operating parameters the UCL PBR radar [1]

Given a minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 14.94 dB, determine the maximum distance to the target from the transmitter as well as from the receiver.

PBR Example Cont’d To solve this problem, we’ll need to use the

bistatic radar equation along with the Cassini range equation.

Figure 2. Oval of Cassini [2]

𝑅𝑇=113𝑘𝑚 ,𝑅𝑅=107𝑘𝑚CP:

Wr:𝑅𝑇=319𝑘𝑚 ,𝑅𝑅=300𝑘𝑚

Contours of Constant SNR

Figure 3. PBR sensitivity plot for the FM radio transmitter at Crystal Palace (a), and Wrotham (b) [1]

(a) (b)

Low cost - no designated transmitter Covert operation Reduced electromagnetic pollution Potential detection of stealth targets

PBR Advantages

Complicated geometry Direct signal interference

(DSI) – can mask the signal of interest

Time-varying characteristics of received signal – e.g. periods of silence (FM), power outage, leakage from adjacent channels, and soil moisture are all out of our control.

PBR Disadvantages

Figure 4. The 20 MHz FM broadcast band (88-108 MHz). [1]

Possible Solutions

Quiet spectrum with high transmitted power.

FM music station – decreases periods of silence

Multiple radio channels – increases robustness/SNR (through integration)

however, using MF increase the DSI

Time-Varying Characteristiccs

Possible Solutions

Cross polarization – observe using horizontal polarization if the transmit polarization is vertical

Array nulls Shielding by topography – select a location

with the weakest DSI

Direct Signal Interference

Center the antenna so that the DSI is received by a null and not the main beam.

For returns close to grazing angles, the direct and reflected signals will tend to cancel each other due to the imperfect nature of the ground.

Targets are at high altitudes where the antenna gain is high.

Array Nulls

Shielding by Topography

Figure 5. Topographical map showing radar (red X), illuminators (blue +) and airport (red O) posistions[3]

Adelaide system: Built by the University of Adelaide, this system was designed to test the potential of DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) for radar applications. Located at the University of Bath, this system monitors air traffic at the Bristol airport.

Shielding by Topography

Figure 6. Propagation loss from Bath (at 0 km) to Wenvoe (at 64 km). [3]

Figure 7. Propagation loss from Bath (at 0 km) to Pur Down (at 20 km). [3]

Total DSI power at any given location can be determined through simulations. This allows us to select a location with minimal DSI.

Shielding by Topography

Figure 8. DSI contributions from all sources [3]

Shielding by Topography

Figure 9. DSI contributions from Naish Hill and Mendip [3]

Figure 10. One way loss from low DSI site to airport [3]

Targets above 1000 m and at least 20 km away can be detected, assuming 120 dB loss is low enough for passenger jet observations.

Shielding by Topography

Figure 11. One way loss at 900 m around a low DSI site [3]

Figure 12. One way loss at 900 m around an alternative low DSI site [3]

Placing multiple receivers at various low DSI sites could provide a more complete air picture [3].

[1] C.J. Baker and D.W. O’Hagen, “Passive Bistatic Radar (PBR) Using FM Radio Illuminator of Opportunity,” Dept. Elect. Eng., London Univ., London.

[2] Wisstein, Eric W. “Cassini Ovals.” From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CassiniOvals.html

[3] C. Coleman, “Mitigating the Effect of Direct Signal Interference in Passive Bistatic Radar,” Dept. Elec. Eng., Adelaide Univ., Adelaide.

References