filing # 133605383 e-filed 08/27/2021 11:38:08 pm
TRANSCRIPT
1 of 256
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA
IN AND OF THE COUNTY OF LEON
TALLAHASSEE
Christine Scott,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
State Of Florida
Ronald Desantis
Florida Department of State
Laurel Lee
Ashley Davis
Colleen O’Brien
Candice Deerica Edwards
Florida Division of Elections
Maria Matthews
Broward County Commission
Palm Beach County Commission
Ted Deutch
Elections Canvassing Commission
Broward County
Nathaniel Klitsberg
Adam Katzman
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
Peter Antonacci
John Way
Daniel Reyez
Ivan Castro
Stephanie Doe (Bc Soe Employee)
Bc Soe Employee Doe #1
Bc Soe Employee Doe #2
Bc Soe Employee Doe #3
Bc Soe Employee Doe #4
Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
Wendy Sartory Link
Sean Williams
Amber Sachs
Ashley Houlihan
Miami-Dade Supervisor of Elections
Christina White
Leon County Supervisor of Elections
Mark S. Earley
Filing # 133605383 E-Filed 08/27/2021 11:38:08 PM
2 of 256
Hernando County Supervisor of Elections
Shirley Anderson
Osceola County Supervisor of Elections
Mary Jane Arrington
Brevard County Supervisor of Elections
Lori Scott
Hillsboro County Supervisor of Elections
Craig Latimer
Alachua County Supervisor of Elections
Kim A. Barton
Wakulla County Supervisor of Elections
Joe Morgan
Lake County Supervisor of Elections
Alan Hays
Bobby Powell
Diane Andre
Kersti Myles Kristofer Stubbs
Bill Gates
Melinda Gates
George Soros
Microsoft
Satya Nadella
Judson Althoff
Brad Smith
Kathleen Hogan
Christopher Capossela
Kevin Scott
Kurt DelBene
Scott Guthrie
Jean-Phillippe Courtois
Rajesh Jha
Amy Hood
David O’Hara
Takeshi Numoto
Harry Shum
Ryan Roslansky
Phil Spencer
Jason Zander
Christopher Young
Christopher Suh
John W. Thompson
Hugh Johnston
Charles W. Scharf
Reid Hoffman
Padmasree Warrior
3 of 256
John W. Stanton
Sandra E. Peterson
Emma Walmsley
Teri List
Penny Pritzker
Blackrock
Larry Fink
Sean Houston
Rob Kapito
Dalia Osman Blass
Axel Christensen
Frank Cooper
Celso Dominguez
Stephan Cohen
Rob L. Goldstein
Ross Znavor
Ben Golub
Gary Shedlin
Christopher Meade
Mark McCombe
Robert W. Fairbairn
Rachel Lord
Phillipp Hildebrand
Bader M. Alsaad
Gordon M. Nixon
Mark Wilson
Pamela Daley
Hans E. Ford
Fabrizio Freda
Margaret L. Johnson
Charles H. Robbins
Marco Antonio Slim Domit
Jessica Einhorn
Murray S. Gerber
Susan L. Wagner
Cheryl Mills
Center For Disease Control
Rochelle P. Walensky
Debra Houry
Mitchell Wolfe
John Auerbach
Sherri A. Berger
Dia Taylor
Jeffrey Reczek
Reginald R. Mebane
Abbigall Tumpey
4 of 256
Michael F. Lademarco
Robin M. Ikeda
John Howard
Nathaniel Smith
Leandris Liburd
Kevin Cain
Jose T. Montero
Daniel Jernigan
Rebecca Bunnell
Leslie Ann Dauphin
Brian C. Moyer
Jay C. Butler
Sam Posner
Rima F. Khabbaz
Jonathan Mermin
Anthony Fauci
Joseph Biden
Hunter Biden
Barack Obama
Kamala Harris
Nancy Pelosi
Xi Jinping
Chinese Communist Party
Government Of China
All Chinese Assets in Florida
Staple Street Capital
Stephen D. Owens
Hootan Yaghoobzaden
Jeffrey D. Hyslop
Rashid Lattouf
Shaun Fitzgibbon
Raheel Valiani
Kevin Siedenburg
Daniel Franklin
David E. Fusco
Thomas Chung
Bryan Godel
Nate Lee
Russell McGahren-Clemens
Luke Thompson
Ryan Zukoff
Peter Conzold
Steve Burgermeister
Dominion Voting Systems
John Poulos
Eric Coomer
5 of 256
Election Software & Systems
Tom Burt
Mark Zuckerberg
Sheryl Sandberg
Eduardo Saverin
Peggy Alford
Marc L. Andreessen
Drew Houston
Nancy Killefer
Robert M. Kimmitt
Peter Thiel
Tracey T. Travis
David Wehner
Michael Schroepfer
Christopher Cox
Jennifer Newstead
Javier Olivan
Alex Schultz
Marne Levine
Will Cathcart
Maxine Williams
David Fischer
Erin Egan
Michael Protti
Stan Chudnovsky
Adam Mosseri
Andrew Bosworth
David Marcus
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Priscilla Chan
Alphabet
Robin L. Washington
Frances Arnold
L. John Doerr
Roger W. Ferguson
Ann Mather
Alan Mulally
K. Ram Shriram
Sundar Pichai
Larry Page
Serge Brin
Caesar Sengupta
Catherine Courage
Eve Andersson
6 of 256
Matt Brittin
Kent Walker
Kate Brandt
Ruth Porat
Anil Sabharwal
Frederik G Pferdt
Melonie Parker
Philipp Schindler
Lorraine Twohill
Thomas Kurian
Hiroshi Lockheimer
Urs Holzle
Jen Fitzpatrick
Rick Osterloh
Richard Marks
Sagar Kamdar
Sameer Samat
Allan C. Thygesen
Bill Ready
Robert Enslin
Adaire Fox-martin
Carolee Gearhart
Neal Mohan
Gerald Wright
Javier Soltero
Kelly Ducourty
Greg Tomb
Lisa Cohen Gevelber
Alison Wagonfield
YouTube
Susan Wojcicki
Robert Kyncl
Danielle Tiedt
Pawal Agarwal
Neal Mohan
Amazon
Jeff Bezo
Andrew R. Jassy
Brian T. Olsavsky
David H. Clark
Shelley L. Reynolds
Adam N. Selipsky
Keith B. Alexander
Amazon Web Services
David A. Zapolsky
Raju Gulabani
7 of 256
Phil Potloff
Eugene Kawamoto
Stephen Schmidt
Carol Potts
Sandy Carter
Jens Gruenkemeier
Jeff Barr
Ian Wilson
Peter Hill
Frank Fallon
Jack Dorsey
Ned Segal
Parag Agrawal
Leslie Berland
Kayvon Beykpour
Matt Derella
Bruce Falck
Michael Montano
Dantley Davis
Vijaya Gadde
Peiter Zatko
Center For Tech and Civil Life
Tiana Epps-Johnson
Whitney May
Donny Bridges
Andrea Abbate
Ananya Ghemawat
Josh Simon Goldman
Rocio Henderson
Keegan Hughes
Nadya Naumann
Kurt Sampsel
Jordan Anderson
Alicia Barry
Ryan Boyd
Henry Chan
Jacynta Ealy
Kellee Massey
Alicia Nutting David Nutting Richard Simoes Holls Sit
Jake Shuford
Rhianna Vaughn
Savanna Wilson
8 of 256
Natalie Wingard Dennis Granados Nareth Phin
Pam Anderson
Tammy Patrick
Sureel Sheth
Cristina Sinclaire
Center For Democracy and Technology
Rock The Vote
The Voting Information Project
Democracy Fund
Knight Foundation
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Women Donors Network
Federal Bureau of Investigations
James Comey
PayPal
Dan Schulman
Nick Aldridge
Joshua Tripp
Aaron Karczmer
John Rainey
Mark Britto
Louise Pentland
Sri Shivandanda
Joshua Auberbach
Peggy Alford
Franz Paasche
Gabrielle Rabinovitch
Ellie Diaz
GoFundMe
Tim Cadogan
Chi-Chao Chang
Stephanie Cunningham
Musa Tariq
Lola Oyzboyd
Paul Tkachuk
Kim Wilford
Rob Soloman
Juan Benitez
Morgan Wood
Apple
Tim Cook
Jeff Williams
Luca Maestri
Eddy Cue
9 of 256
Katherine Adams
Craig Federighi
John Giannandrea
Sabih Khan
Greg Joswiak
Deirdre O’Brien
John Ternus
Johny Srouji
Lisa Jackson
Isabel Ge Mahe
Tor Myhren
Adrian Perica
James A. Bell
Arthur D. Levinson
Albert Gore
Andrea Jung
Monica Lozano
Susan L. Wagner
Ronald D. Sugar
Broward County Sheriff
Broward County Police
Coral Springs Police
Broward County Clerk of the Court
Fourth District Court of Appeals Clerk of the Court
Fourth District Court of Appeals Clerk of the Court ‘KH’
UBS Securities
Ralph Hamers
Phyllis Constanza
Kirt Gardner
Simon Riis-Nielsen
Christina L. Y. Tung
Mike Dargan
Markus Y. Diethelm
Tom Naratil
Iqbal Khan
Andreas Moser
Robert Karofsky
Reto Francioni
Fred Hu
Edmund Koh
Mark Hughes
Jeremy Anderson
Nathalie Rachou
Ulrich Therekelsen
Julie G. Richardson
Dieter Wemmer
10 of 256
Jeanette Wong
Markus Ronner
Alex A. Weber
Hugo van Kattenkijke
Mariana Gregori
Suni Harford
Mans Levin
Dirk Svendsen
Claudio Scarfone
Claudia Bockstiegel
William C. Dudley
Patrick Firmenich
Thomas Bolle
Central Intelligence Agency
John Brennan
Saudia Arabia
Pakistan
Mitch McConnell
Charles Schumer
Don Rubottom
Mark Milley
Defendants/Appellees.
_____________________________________________________________
CONTEST OF ELECTION STATEMENT
Plaintiff, Christine Scott, (‘Scott’) unsuccessful candidate for the Office of US House of
Representatives, taxpayer and voter, in District 22, hereby sues defendants contesting the
election, pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168, moves the election be held anew and declares the
following:
1. This is an action to contest the 2020 Florida election cycle, de-certify the election and
hold it anew, or in the alternative to conduct of forensic audit, in the State of Florida, as a
whole, or in the alternative in Palm Beach County and Broward County.
11 of 256
2. This is an action for damages greater than $30K.
3. The election fraud, misconduct and public corruption started in November 2019 and
continued throughout the election cycle and beyond the date of the November 3, 2020
election.
4. Leon County Circuit Court has jurisdiction because Scott was an unsuccessful candidate
in District 22, is a taxpayer, and an elector, because all Contests of Election which
involve more than one county, by default, must be filed in the Leon County Court.
District 22 is within both Palm Beach and Broward Counties, and because Scott is
making the claim that due to substantial statewide fraud, misconduct and public
corruption the entire 2020 election process must be held anew because fraud vitiates
everything.
5. Plaintiff demands a jury trial.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
6. This Contest of Election Statement brings to light the multi-faceted election fraud,
multiple violations of the Florida Election Code Fla. Stats. 97-106, several additional
Florida Statutes; numerous Constitutional violations, including 1st Amendment Right to
Ballot Access, and 14th Amendment Right violations of Equal Protection to Ballot Access
as a Protected Class.
7. The scheme to defraud Scott’s legal right to ballot access and her right to vote was multi-
faceted and involved several election officials, including but not limited to Governor
DeSantis; Secretary of State, Laurel Lee; General Director of the Division of Elections,
Maria Matthews; Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Peter Antonacci; and Palm
12 of 256
Beach County Supervisor of Elections, Wendy Sartory Link as well as numerous
additional corporate, 501(c)(3) enterprises and various other entities.
CONTEST OF ELECTION
8. Scott is contesting Florida’s District 22, United States House of Representatives
certification of Ted Deutch based on misconduct, election fraud and public corruption.
Pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168(1), Scott has the right to contest the nomination and
certification of Ted Deutch for the Office of United States House of Representatives, in
District 22, because Scott was an unsuccessful candidate for the Office of United States
House of Representatives, in District 22, and because she is a Taxpayer in the State of
Florida.
9. Scott is also contesting the broader elections that took place for the office of US House of
Representatives in both Broward County and Palm Beach County, as well as the
legitimacy of the results of the entire down ballot in the State of Florida during the 2020
election cycle. In respect to the Presidential election, Scott is only contesting the ballot
count, not the winner. Scott believes President Trump fairly won the 2020 General
Election. She believes President Trump’s win was by a landslide, not a slight margin. The
down ballot includes all state, county and local races due to the rampant fraud,
misconduct and public corruption.
INDISPENSIBLE PARTIES
10. Pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168(4), Ted Deutch has been added as an indispensable party
because he was the successful candidate; the Election Canvassing Committee was added
as an indispensable party because some of the seats in contest were federal, state and
multicounty seats; the Broward County (Canvassing) Commission is an indispensable
13 of 256
party because several of the seats in contest relate to local and county elections, Palm
Beach County (Canvassing) Commission is a dispensable party because several seats in
the contest relate to local and county elections.
PARTIES
11. State of Florida, Governor Ronald Desantis is being sued in both his official and
individual capacities; Florida Department of State, Secretary of State Laurel Lee (‘SOS
Lee’) is being sued in her official and individual capacities, Ashley Davis is being sued in
her official and individual capacities, Colleen O’Brien is being sued in her official and
individual capacities, Candice Deerica Edwards is being sued in her official and
individual capacities, Florida Division of Elections (‘DOE’), Maria Matthews is being
sued in her official and individual capacities, Broward County (Canvassing)
Commission; Palm Beach County (Canvassing) Commission; Ted Deutch in his official
capacity as United States House of Representatives for Florida’s District 22; Elections
Canvassing Commission; Broward County (‘BC’), Nathaniel Klitsberg (‘Klitsberg’) in
his individual capacity, Adam Katzman (‘Katzman’) in his individual capacity, Broward
County Supervisor of Elections (‘BCSOE’), Peter Antonacci (‘Antonacci’) in his official
and individual capacities; John Way (‘Way’) in his individual capacity, Daniel Reyez
(‘Reyez’) in his individual capacity, Ivan Castro (‘Castro’) in his individual capacity,
Stephanie Doe (Broward County Supervisor of Elections Employee in her individual
capacity), Broward County Supervisor of Elections Employee Doe #1 (‘BCSOE Doe #1)
in his/her individual capacity, Broward County Supervisor of Elections Employee Doe #2
(BCSOE Doe #2) in his/her individual capacity, Broward County Supervisor of Elections
Employee Doe #3 (BCSOE Doe #3) in his/her individual capacity, Broward County
14 of 256
Supervisor of Elections Employee Doe #4 (BCSOE Doe #4) in his/her individual
capacity (known collectively as ‘BCSOE’; Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
(‘PBCSOE’) Wendy Sartory Link (‘Sartory Link’ or ‘Link’) in her official and individual
capacities, Sean Williams (‘Williams’) in his individual capacity, Amber Sachs (‘Sachs’)
in her individual capacity, Ashley Houlihan (‘Houlihan’) in her individual capacity
(collectively known as ‘PBCSOE’); Miami-Dade Supervisor of Elections Christina White
(‘MDSOE’) in her official and individual capacities; Leon County Supervisor of
Elections Mark S. Earley (‘LeonCSOE’) in his official and individual capacities;
Hernando County Supervisor of Elections Shirley Anderson (‘HernCSOE’) in her official
and individual capacities; Osceola County Supervisor of Elections Mary Jane Arrington
(‘OsceCSOE’) in her official and individual capacities; Brevard County Supervisor of
Elections Lori Scott (‘BrevCSOE’) in her official and individual capacities; Hillsboro
County Supervisor of Elections Craig Latimer (‘HillCSOE’) in his official and individual
capacities; Alachua County Supervisor of Elections Kim A. Barton (‘AlacCSOE’) in her
official and individual capacities; Wakulla County Supervisor of Elections Joe Morgan
(‘WakuSOE’) in his official and individual capacities; Lake County Supervisor of
Elections Alan Hays (‘LakeCSOE’) in his official and individual capacities; Florida
Senator Bobby Powell (‘Powell’) in his official and individual capacities, Diane Andre in
her individual capacity, Kersti Myles in her individual capacity, Kristofer Stubbs in his
individual capacity, (the combined above are herein known as ‘public servants’); Bill
Gates (‘Gates’) in his individual capacity; Melinda Gates in her individual capacity; the
Bill and Melanie Gates Foundation; George Soros (‘Soros’) in his individual capacity;
Microsoft, Satya Nadella (‘Nadella’) in his individual capacity, Judson Althoff in his
15 of 256
individual capacity, Brad Smith in his individual capacity, Kathleen Hogan in her
individual capacity, Christopher Capossela in his individual capacity, Kevin Scott in his
individual capacity, Kurt DelBene in her individual capacity, Scott Guthrie in his
individual capacity, Jean-Phillippe Coutois in his individual capacity, Rajesh Jha in his
individual capacity, Amy Hood in her individual capacity, David O’Hara in his individual
capacity, Takeshi Numoto in his individual capacity, Harry Shum in his individual
capacity, Ryan Roslansky in his individual capacity, Phil Spencer in his individual
capcity, Jason Zander in his individual capacity, Christopher Young in his individual
capacity, Christopher Suh in his individual capacity, John W. Thompson in his individual
capacity, Hugh Johnston in his individual capacity, Charles W. Scharf in his individual
capacity, Reid Hoffman in his individual capacity, Padmasree Warrior in her individual
capacity, John W. Stanton in his individual capacity, Sandra E. Peterson in her individual
capacity, Emma Walmsley in her individual capacity, Teri List in her individual capacity,
Penny Pritzker in her individual capacity (Microsoft co-founder, executives, employees
and board members collectively known as ‘Microsoft’); Blackrock, Larry Fink in his
individual capacity, Sean Houston in his individual capacity, Robert Kapito in his
individual capacity, Dalia Osman Blass in her individual capacity, Axel Christensen in
his individual capacity, Frank Cooper in his individual capacity, Celso Dominguez in his
individual capacity, Stephan Cohen in his individual capacity, Rob L. Goldstein in his
individual capacity, Ross Znavor in his individual capacity, Ben Golub in his individual
capacity, Gary Shedlin in his individual capacity, Christopher Meade in his individual
capacity, Marc McCombe in his individual capacity, Robert W. Fairbairn in his
individual capacity, Rachel Lord in her individual capacity, Phillipp Hildebrand in his
16 of 256
individual capacity, Bader M. Alsaad in his individual capacity, Gordon M. Nixon in his
individual capacity, Mark Wilson in his individual capacity, Pamela Daley in her
individual capacity, Hans E. Vestberg in his individual capacity, William E. Ford in his
individual capacity, Fabrizio Freda in his individual capacity, Margaret L. Johnson in her
individual capacity, Charles H. Robbins in his individual capacity, Marco Antonio Slim
Domit in his individual capacity, Jessica Einhorn in her individual capacity, Murray S.
Gerber in his individual capacity, Susan L. Wagner in her individual capacity, Cheryl
Mills in her individual capacity (Blackrock executives, board members and other above
mentioned Blackrock employees collectively known as ‘Blackrock’); Center For Disease
Control (‘CDC’), Rochelle P. Walensky in her individual capacity, Debra Houry in her
individual capacity, Mitchell Wolfe in his individual capacity, John Auerbach in his
individual capacity, Sherri A. Berger in her individual capacity, Dia Taylor in her
individual capacity, Jeffrey Reczek in his individual capacity, Reginald R. Mebane in her
individual capacity, Abbigall Tumpey in her individual capacity, Michael F. Lademarco
in his individual capacity, Robin M. Ikeda in her individual capacity, John Howard in his
individual capacity, Nathaniel Smith in his individual capacity, Leandris Liburd in her
individual capacity, Kevin Cain in his individual capacity, Jose T. Montero in his
individual capacity, Daniel Jernigan in his individual capacity, Rebecca Bunnell in her
individual capacity, Leslie Ann Dauphin in her individual capacity, Brian C. Moyer in his
individual capacity, Jay C. Butler in his individual capacity, Sam Posner in his individual
capacity, Rima F. Khabbaz in her individual capacity, Johnathan Mermin in his
individual capacity (Center for Disease Control executive and other CDC employees
herein known as ‘CDC’); Anthony Fauci (‘Fauci’) in his official and individual capacity,
17 of 256
Joseph Biden (‘Biden’) in his official and individual capacities, Hunter Biden (‘Hunter’)
in his official and individual capacities, Kamala Harris (‘Harris’) in her official and
individual capacities, Nancy Pelosi (‘Pelosi’), Xi Jinping (‘Xi’) in his official and
individual capacities, Chinese Communist Party (‘CCP’), Government Of China, All
Chinese Assets In Florida (all Chinese assets and government entities herein known as
‘China’ or ‘CCP’), Staple Street Capital, Stephen D. Owens in his individual capacity,
Hootan Yaghoobzaden in his individual capacity, Jeffrey D. Hyslop in his individual
capacity, Rashid Lattouf in his individual capacity, Shaun Fitzgibbon in his individual
capacity, Raheel Valiani in his individual capacity, Kevin Siedenburg in his individual
capacity, Daniel Franklin in his individual capacity, David E. Fusco in his individual
capacity, Thomas Chung in his individual capacity, Bryan Godel in his individual
capacity, Nate Lee in his individual capacity, Russell McGahren-Clemens in his
individual capacity, Luke Thompson in his individual capacity, Ryan Zukoff in his
individual capacity, Peter Conzold in his individual capacity, Steve Burgermeister in his
individual capacity (Staple Street Capital executives and employees listed above
collectively known as ‘Staple Street Capital’), Dominion Voting Systems (‘Dominion’),
John Poulos in his official and individual capacity, Eric Coomer in his official and
individual capacity, Dominion Voting Systems employees and contractors 1-500 in their
individual capacities (collectively known as ‘Dominion’); Election Software & Systems
(‘ES&S’), Tom Burt, ES&S employees and contractors 1-500 in their individual
capacities (collectively known as ‘ES&S’); Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg in his official
and individual capacities, Sheryl Sandberg in her official and individual capacities,
Eduardo Saverin in his official and individual capacities, Peggy Alford in her official and
18 of 256
individual capacities, Marc L. Andreessen in his official and individual capacities, Drew
Houston in his official and individual capacities, Nancy Killefer in her official and
individual capacities, Robert M. Kimmitt in his official and individual capacities, Peter
Thiel in his official and individual capacities, Tracey T. Travis in his official and
individual capacities, David Wehner in his individual and official capacities, Michael
Schroepfer in his individual and official capacities, Christopher Cox in his official and
individual capacities, Jennifer Newstead in her official and individual capacities, Javier
Olivan in his official and individual capacities, Alex Schultzin his official and individual
capacities, Marne Levine in her official and individual capacities, Will Cathcart in his
official and individual capacities, Maxine Williams in her official and individual
capacities, David Fischer in his official and individual capacities, Erin Egan in her
official and individual capacities, Michael Protti in his official and individual capacities,
Stan Chudnovsky in his official and individual capacities, Adam Mosseri in his official
and individual capacities, Andrew Bosworth in his official and individual capacities,
David Marcus in his official and individual capacities (Facebook executives, board
members, employees and other Facebook affiliates mentioned above are herein known as
‘Facebook’), Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (‘CZI’), Priscilla Chan in her official ‘CZI’
capacity and in her individual capacity; Alphabet, Robin L. Washington in her official
and individual capacity, Frances Arnold in her official and individual capacities, L. John
Doerr in his official and individual capacities, Roger W. Ferguson in his official and
individual capacities, Ann Mather in her official and individual capacities, Alan Mulally
in his official and individual capacities, K. Ram Shriram in his official and individual
capacities (Alphabet executives, board members and others employees listed collectively
19 of 256
known as ‘Alphabet’); Google, Sundar Pichai in his official and individual capacities,
Larry Page in his official and individual capacities, Sergey Brin in his official and
individual capacities, Caesar Sengupta in his official and individual capacities, Catherine
Courage in her official and individual capacities, Eve Andersson in her official and
individual capacities, Matt Brittin in his official and individual capacities, Kent Walker in
his official and individual capacities, Kate Brandt in her official and individual capacities,
Ruth Porat in her official and individual capacities, Anil Sabharwal in his official and
individual capacities, Frederik G Pferdt in his official and individual capacities, Melonie
Parker in his official and individual capacities, Philipp Schindler in his official and
individual capacities, Lorraine Twohill in her official and individual capacities, Thomas
Kurian in his official and individual capacities, Hiroshi Lockheimer in his official and
individual capacities, Urs Holzle in his official and individual capacities, Jen Fitzpatrick
in her official and individual capacities, Rick Osterloh in his official and individual
capacities, Richard Marks in his official and individual capacities, Sagar Kamdar in his
official and individual capacities, Sameer Samat in his official and individual capacities,
Allan C. Thygesen in his official and individual capacities, Bill Ready in his official and
individual capacities, Robert Enslin in his official and individual capacities, Adaire Fox-
martin in his official and individual capacities, Carolee Gearhart in her official and
individual capacities, Neal Mohan in his official and individual capacities, Gerald Wright
in his official and individual capacities, Javier Soltero in his official and individual
capacities, Kelly Ducourty in her official and individual capacities, Greg Tomb in his
official and individual capacities, Lisa Cohen Gevelber in her official and individual
capacities, Alison Wagonfield in her official and individual capacities, YouTube, Susan
20 of 256
Wojcicki in her official and individual capacities, Robert Kyncl in his official and
individual capacities, Danielle Tiedt in her official and individual capacities, Pawal
Agarwal in his official and individual capacities, Neal Mohan in his official and
individual capacities, Amazon, Jeff Bezo in his official and individual capacities, Andrew
R. Jassy in his official and individual capacities, Brian T. Olsavsky in his official and
individual capacities, David H. Clark in his official and individual capacities, Shelley L.
Reynolds in her official and individual capacities, Adam N. Selipsky in his official and
individual capacities, Keith B. Alexander in his official and individual capacities,
Amazon Web Services, David A. Zapolsky in his official and individual capacities, Raju
Gulabani in his official and individual capacities, Phil Potloff in his official and
individual capacities, Eugene Kawamoto in his official and individual capacities, Stephen
Schmidt in his official and individual capacities, Carol Potts in her official and individual
capacities, Sandy Carter in her official and individual capacities, Jens Gruenkemeier in
his official and individual capacities, Jeff Barr in his official and individual capacities,
Ian Wilson in his official and individual capacities, Peter Hill in his official and
individual capacities, Frank Fallon in his official and individual capacities, Twitter, Jack
Dorsey in his official and individual capacities, Ned Segal in his official and individual
capacities, Parag Agrawal in his official and individual capacities, Leslie Berland in her
official and individual capacities, Kayvon Beykpour in his official and individual
capacities, Matt Derella in his official and individual capacities, Bruce Falck in his
official and individual capacities, Michael Montano in his official and individual
capacities, Dantley Davis in his official and individual capacities, Vijaya Gadde in his
official and individual capacities, Peiter Zatko in his official and individual capacities,
21 of 256
Center For Tech And Civil Life, Tiana Epps-Johnson in her official and individual
capacities, Whitney May in his official and individual capacities, Donny Bridges in his
official and individual capacities, Andrea Abbate in his official and individual capacities,
Ananya Ghemawat in her official and individual capacities, Josh Simon Goldman in his
official and individual capacities, Rocio Henderson in his official and individual
capacities, Keegan Hughes in his official and individual capacities, Nadya Naumann in
her official and individual capacities, Kurt Sampsel in his official and individual
capacities, Jordan Anderson in his official and individual capacities, Alicia Barry in her
official and individual capacities, Ryan Boyd in his official and individual capacities,
Henry Chan in his official and individual capacities, Jacynta Ealy in her official and
individual capacities, Kellee Massey in her official and individual capacities, Alicia
Nutting in her official and individual capacities, David Nutting in his official and
individual capacities, Richard Simoes in his official and individual capacities, Holls Sit in
his official and individual capacities, Jake Shuford in his official and individual
capacities, Rhianna Vaughn in her official and individual capacities, Savanna Wilson in
her official and individual capacities, Natalie Wingard in her official and individual
capacities, Dennis Granados in his official and individual capacities, Nareth Phin in his
official and individual capacities, Pam Anderson in her official and individual capacities,
Tammy Patrick in her official and individual capacities, Sureel Sheth in his official and
individual capacities, Cristina Sinclaire in his official and individual capacities, Center
For Democracy And Technology, Rock The Vote, The Voting Information Project,
Democracy Fund, Knight Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Women Donors
Network, Federal Bureau of Investigations, PayPal, Dan Schulman in his official and
22 of 256
individual capacities, Nick Aldridge in his official and individual capacities, Joshua Tripp
in his official and individual capacities, Aaron Karczmer in his official and individual
capacities, John Rainey in his official and individual capacities, Mark Britto in his
official and individual capacities, Louise Pentland in her official and individual
capacities, Sri Shivandanda in his official and individual capacities, Joshua Auberbach in
his official and individual capacities, Peggy Alford in her official and individual
capacities, Franz Paasche in his official and individual capacities, Gabrielle Rabinovitch
in her official and individual capacities, Ellie Diaz in her official and individual
capacities, GoFundMe, Tim Cadogan in his official and individual capacities, Chi-Chao
Chang in his official and individual capacities, Stephanie Cunningham in her official and
individual capacities, Musa Tariq in his official and individual capacities, Lola Oyzboyd
in her official and individual capacities, Paul Tkachuk in his official and individual
capacities, Kim Wilford in her official and individual capacities, Rob Soloman in his
official and individual capacities, Juan Benitez in his official and individual capacities,
Morgan Wood in his official and individual capacities, Apple, Tim Cook in his official
and individual capacities, Jeff Williams in his official and individual capacities, Luca
Maestri in her official and individual capacities, Eddy Cue in his official and individual
capacities, Katherine Adams in her official and individual capacities, Craig Federighi in
his official and individual capacities, John Giannandrea in his official and individual
capacities, Sabih Khan in his official and individual capacities, Greg Joswiak in his
official and individual capacities, Deirdre O’Brien in her official and individual
capacities, John Ternus in his official and individual capacities, Johny Srouji in his
official and individual capacities, Lisa Jackson in her official and individual capacities,
23 of 256
Isabel Ge Ma in her official and individual capacities, Tor Myhren in his official and
individual capacities, Adrian Perica in his official and individual capacities, James A.
Bell in his official and individual capacities, Arthur D. Levinson in his official and
individual capacities, Albert Gore in his official and individual capacities, Andrea Jung in
his official and individual capacities, Monica Lozano in her official and individual
capacities, Susan L. Wagner in her official and individual capacities, Ronald D. Sugar in
his official and individual capacities, Broward County Sheriff , Broward County Police,
Coral Springs Police, Broward County Clerk of the Court, Fourth District Court of
Appeals Clerk of the Court, Fourth District Court of Appeals Clerk of the Court ‘KH’,
UBS Securities, Ralph Hames in his official and individual capacities, Phyllis Constanza
in her official and individual capacities, Kirt Gardner in his official and individual
capacities, Simon Riis-Nielsen in his official and individual capacities, Christina L. Y.
Tung in her official and individual capacities, Brian Cantanella in his official and
individual capacities, Christian Bluhm in his official and individual capacities, Mike
Dargan in his official and individual capacities, Markus U. Diethelm in his official and
individual capacities, Tom Naratil in his official and individual capacities, Iqbal Khan in
his official and individual capacities, Andreas Moser in his official and individual
capacities, Robert Karofsky in his official and individual capacities, Reto Francioni in his
official and individual capacities, Fred Hu in his official and individual capacities,
Edmund Koh in his official and individual capacities, Mark Hughes in his official and
individual capacities, Jeremy Anderson in his official and individual capacities, Nathalie
Rachou in his official and individual capacities, Ulrich Therekelsen in his official and
individual capacities, Julie G. Richardson in her official and individual capacities, Dieter
24 of 256
Wemmer in her official and individual capacities, Jeanette Wong in her official and
individual capacities, Markus Ronner in his official and individual capacities, Alex A.
Weber in his official and individual capacities, Hugo van Kattendijke in his official and
individual capacities, Mariana Gregori in her official and individual capacities, Suni
Harford in his official and individual capacities, Mans Levin in his official and individual
capacities, Dirk Svendsen in his official and individual capacities, Claudio Scarfone in
his official and individual capacities, Claudia Bockstiegel in her official and individual
capacities, William C. Dudley in his official and individual capacities, Patrick Firmenich
in his official and individual capacities, Thomas Bolle in his official and individual
capacities, Central Intelligence Agency (‘CIA’); John Brennan in his official and
individual capacities, Saudia Arabia, Pakistan, Mitch McConnell in his official and
individual capacities, Charles Schumer in his official and individual capacities, Mark
Milley in his official and individual capacities, Don Rubottom in his official and
individual capacities, Barack Obama in his official and individual capacities, James
Comey in his official and individual capacities
JURISDICTION
12. This court has jurisdiction, pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168(1) which reads, ‘the certification
of election or nomination of any person to office...may be contested in the circuit court...’
CONTEST OF ELECTION MAY NOT BE REJECTED OR DISMISSED
13. Pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168(5), ‘A statement of the grounds of contest may not be
rejected, nor the proceedings dismissed, by the court for any want of form if the grounds
of contest provided in the statement are sufficient to clearly inform the defendant of the
particular proceeding or cause for which the nomination or election is contested.’
25 of 256
TIMEFRAME
14. In accordance with Fla. Stat. 102.168(2), Scott is filing her complaint ‘with the Clerk of
the Circuit Court within ten days after midnight of the date the last board responsible for
certifying the results officially certifies the results of the election being contested.’ If the
last board responsible for certifying the election certified the election on Nov. 17, 2020,
then the election could be contested between Nov. 18-28, 2020. In this case the following
Monday due to the Thanksgiving Holiday.
Rule 1.370(12) Time for responses
Admissions in response to request served by mail on October 20 were due Nov.
24 (30 days plus five for mail service). Where 24th fell on Thanksgiving Day,
following day was court-ordered holiday, followed by two-day weekend, first day
when admissions were due was Monday following, the 28th. See Cassas v. Lazan,
488 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
a. In accordance with the Thanksgiving Day Holiday, this Contest of Election
Statement will be filed on or before Monday, Nov. 30, 2020.
15. Scott does not believe the certification legitimately took place on Nov. 17, 2020
(1min49sec video of entire Nov. 17 certification meeting:
https://thefloridachannel.org/videos/11-17-20-elections-canvassing-commission/). The
meeting was run by an unauthorized individual was not a commission member and who
did not have the authority to partake in the meeting, Secretary of State Laurel Lee. Since
she held no authority in the meeting no power was invested in her to run a meeting
certifying the election. Scott believes this means the certification is yet to take place.
16. For the sake of argument, Scott has filed this motion presently, in case the matter of the
Commission meeting’s legality is not addressed elsewhere or is overlooked or for
26 of 256
whatever reason it might lead to Scott necessarily properly filing her Contest of Election
Statement presently, if in fact the certification date remains Nov. 17, 2020.
17. Scott is officially protesting the certification, which took place on Nov. 17, 2020 as not
valid because it was not run by members of the commission – the only people who hold
authority to run an Election Canvassing Commission meeting.
18. Scott’s claims are based on fraud, unfairness and disenfranchisement of voters, and in
such, even without Fla. Stat. 102.168, Scott’s motion is timely. Barring fraud,
unfairness, or disenfranchisement of voters, it is too late to attack the validity of an
election after the people have voted, Levey v. Dijols, 990 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA
2008).
MISCONDUCT, FRAUD & CORRUPTION
19. Pursuant Fla. Stat. 102.168(3), Scott’s complaint sets forth her grounds to contest the
election based on misconduct, fraud and corruption on the part of several election
officials, some of whom are named in this instant suit.
20. Scott’s claims are, in part, based in fraud, unfairness and disenfranchisement of voters,
and in such, it is not too late to attack the validity of an election after the people have
voted. Levey v. Dijols, 990 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
SCOTT OBTAINED RIGHT TO BALLOT ACCESS IN THREE SEPARATE WAYS (1)
FRAUDULENTLY REJECTED PETITIONS KEPT SCOTT OFF BALLOT; (2)
ELECTION OFFICIALS HAD OBLIGATION TO REDUCE TOTAL NUMBER OF
PETITIONS TO GAIN BALLOT ACCESS DUE TO COVID-19 TO ENSURE
PETITIONING IS REASONABLE DURING A PANDEMIC; AND (3) SCOTT’S
PROTECTED CLASS STATUS AS AN INDIGENT
21. The below sections A. B. and C. describes three distinct ways Scott was deprived of
ballot access.
27 of 256
a. Fraud
b. Unreasonable petitioning conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic
c. State’s deprivation of Scott’s rights to ballot access under the Fourteenth
Amendment, due to her protected class status as an indigent.
22. The Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Palm Beach County Supervisor of
Elections, Division of Elections, the Secretary of State, the lawyers of the
aforementioned, and the Governor of the State of Florida have willfully and intentionally
treated Florida as their personal wannabe Venezuela looking to become besties with
China. DeSantis hand-picked and appointed each of the elected officials in this mix.
Discovery into close relatives of the elected officials is important for this to be a fair
judicial process. The votes were rigged in more ways than I have fingers. The fraud was
easier to hide, in Florida, than in other states because the votes were counted in advance.
This allowed the corruption, or is it ‘corrections’, to take place before the election process
was put under the spotlight on Election Day. The adjustments happened real time but
early enough that no one was paying attention. That fraud happened on a much broader
scale than just an attempt to keep Scott off the ballot.
23. Scott does not believe the Florida Legislature allows votes to be counted in advance,
which in and of itself would prove enough fraud or misconduct to set aside the entire
election process in Broward County and Palm Beach County.
24. There is tyranny running rampant by our election officials and public servants working
within our voting systems. It is as though there is so much corruption within the electoral
process that the election officials have completely forgotten that fraud is illegal, that it is
not okay to rig an election. What happened to me happens to candidates every year. The
28 of 256
process is too smooth and mechanical for it to be a first-time out scenario. Each election
official counting petitions has their personal style of rejecting valid petitions, just like
each of us has a unique personality. We, as a State, must address fraud now for it is not
just today that matters but the elections to come. This election was a quiet takeover of the
system. A trial run to ensure the wins in the 2024 General Election, and the US House
and Senate Seats in 2022 will be won stealthily with total hidden fraudulence. Our court
system must not be a lame duck or turn a blind-eye. Now is not the time to believe such
fraud within our trusted halls of government is an impossibility. Our enemies demand
your ignorance and disbelief. Our sensibilities want to ignore the reality that our nation is
on the brink of losing ourselves – which means a loss of freedoms, rights, liberties and
the pursuit of happiness. There are no survivors in that scenario because socialism and
communism cannot win if freedom is alive in a society. We must not betray our own
future by lackadaisically placating our enemy. Nothing more than due diligence is
needed. Today is the day to show up for the noble endeavor. The threat is real. It is you
who holds the gavel of justice which will ensure the security of future elections and a
continued democracy.
Due to the substantial noncompliance with statutory election procedures, there is reasonable
doubt as to whether the certification of the 2020 General Election expressed the will of the
voters. In such, the election should be set aside. see Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing
Board by and through Harris, 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018); Fouts v. Bolay, 795 So. 2d
1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Beckstrom v. Volusia County Canvassing Bd., 707 So. 2d 720 (Fla.
1998). (emphasis added)
29 of 256
ARGUMENT (1): FRAUDULENTLY REJECTED PETITIONS ILLEGALLY KEPT
SCOTT OFF THE BALLOT WHICH MEANT AN INCOMPLETE BALLOT WAS
PRINTED DISENFRANCHISING A HALF MILLION VOTERS IN DISTRICT 22 AND
DEPRIVING SCOTT OF BALLOT ACCESS WHICH IS UNFAIR IN A DEMOCRACY
(A) Secretary of State, Laurel Lee, Refused to Take Action to Curb the Rampant Election
Fraud Inflicted Upon Scott’s Campaign by Election Officials in Broward County and Palm
Beach County
25. On several occasions, Scott contacted the Department of State regarding several different
elements of election fraud which Scott experienced. Several communications were sent
directly to Secretary of State, Laurel Lee. (Exhibit 3) As Scott would encounter new or
additional forms of or attempts of fraud, she would update Secretary Lee to ensure Lee
had the opportunity to properly address the matter. Sometimes, Scott contacted attorneys
in the State’s General Counsel’s office (either Colleen O’Brien or Ashley Davis) and
cc:ed the Secretary of State.
26. Broward County Supervisor of Elections Peter Antonacci and Palm Beach County
Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link, and their respective relevant deputies,
erroneously rejected a combined minimum of 847 valid petitions. The Division of
Election’s final count unlawfully put Scott at 348 valid petitions shy of ballot access,
which was due to the fraudulently rejected petitions that unlawfully kept Scott off the
ballot.
27. In fact, Scott had received at least 507 more valid petitions than needed to gain ballot
access.
Fla. Stat. 99.095(5) If the required number of signatures has been obtained, the
candidate is eligible to qualify pursuant to s. 99.061.
30 of 256
28. Fraud by opposing counsel representing election officials prevented Scott from properly
having the case heard before the Primary Election.
29. Scott alleges the outcome of the election would be different and that she would have won
the Primary Election had her name been properly placed on the ballot. Scott further
believes that it is very likely she would have won the General Election, excluding any
election fraud interference by election officials and/or Dominion, or other nefarious
actors.
‘...Fraud and corruption may permeate entire absentee balloting process,
regardless of whether number of ballots conclusively shown to be invalid would
change the outcome of the election and, once substantial fraud or corruption
has been established to the extent that it permeated the election process, it is
unnecessary to demonstrate with mathematical certainty that the number of
fraudulently cast ballots actually affected the outcome of the election....'
Bolden v. Potter Supreme Court of Florida. June 28, 1984 452 So.2d 564 18.
30. As in Bolden v. Potter, Scott is able to establish substantial fraud and corruption to the
extent that it permeated the election process. Therefore, it is not necessary to demonstrate
with mathematical certainty that the fraudulently cast ballots actually affected the
outcome of the election.
31. 847 of Scott’s petitions were fraudulently rejected to keep Scott off the ballot.
32. The ballot was not accurate, hence not valid, since it did not include all eligible
candidates.
33. The ballot was fundamentally flawed by the refusal of the election officials to properly
count all valid petitions and place Scott's name on the ballot even though election
officials knew Scott had obtained enough valid petitions to be placed on the ballot,
pursuant Fla. Stat. 99.095. Peter Antonacci, Wendy Satory Link, Maria Matthews, Laurel
Lee and Gov. DeSantis all knew that Scott had obtained ballot access yet they refused to
31 of 256
place her name on the ballot or attempt to investigate or remedy the fraudulent exclusion
of her name to the ballot, which in and of itself was substantial fraud and corruption by
election officials which permeated the election process.
Courts cannot ignore fraudulent conduct which is purposefully done to foul
the election or corrupt the ballot. Bolden v. Potter Supreme Court of Florida.
June 28, 1984 452 So.2d 564 18 Ed. Law Rep. 801
34. The fraud perpetrated against Scott was done so to foul the election and to corrupt the
ballot. In such, the court cannot ignore the fraudulent conduct.
35. The fraudulent count of Scott’s petition was unfair to her and the voters of District 22
because it prevented an eligible candidate from ballot access and disenfranchised a half
million voters in District 22. The fraud potentially altered the outcome of the General
Election and puts into question the rightful holder of the office for US House of
Representatives.
36. Secretary of State, Laurel Lee, had an obligation to ensure the election ballot had every
eligible candidate’s name on it. The Secretary was aware of the extensive fraud which
kept Scott’s name off the ballot. The Secretary refused to take action to cure the fraud,
ensure Scott was not deprived of ballot access and that voters in District 22 were not
disenfranchised. Secretary Lee refused to uphold her duty to protect the public.
Fla. Stat. 97.012 Secretary of State as chief election officer. —The Secretary
of State is the chief election officer of the state, and it is his or her responsibility
to:
(14) Bring and maintain such actions at law or in equity by mandamus or
injunction to enforce the performance of any duties of a county supervisor of
elections or any official performing duties with respect to chapters 97 through
102 and 105 or to enforce compliance with a rule of the Department of State
adopted to interpret or implement any of those chapters.
(15) Conduct preliminary investigations into any irregularities or fraud
involving...candidate petition...and report his or her findings to the statewide
prosecutor or the state attorney for the judicial circuit in which the alleged
32 of 256
violation occurred for prosecution, if warranted. The Department of State may
prescribe by rule requirements for filing an elections-fraud complaint and for
investigating any such complaint.
37. May 4 -5, 2020, Scott filed ten sets of Election Fraud Complaints [Form DS-
DE#34(rev.07/2016)]. A copy of all ten Fraud Complaints were returned to Scott. Only
four of the ten Fraud Complaints were stamped by the Office of the General Counsel. The
stamp date read, ‘RECEIVED May 04, 2020 Office of the General Counsel’. Only Sets 1,
7, 8 and 9 were stamped as received. For the record sets 1-9 were from May 4, 2020. Set
10 was from May 5, 2020.
38. Scott believes O’Brien refused to address the fraud complaints which O’Brien believed
she could not win against in a court of law. In such, O’Brien returned the winnable fraud
complaints without recording them or addressing them hoping that Scott would not notice
O’Brien’s additional fraud perpetrated to cover up the already alleged fraud stated in the
fraud complaints.
39. On October 9, 2020, Assistant General Counsel, Colleen E. O’Brien returned the 10 sets
of Fraud Complaints writing in erroneous by pertinent part, ‘We do not find reason to
believe that irregularities of fraud related to candidate petitions activities occurred.’
40. Scott alleges the department knew fraud had taken place, assisted in the fraud and
assessed that, due to Scott’s status as a pro se, indigent, she would not be able to fight the
fraud. In such, the Secretary determined not to take action and instructed Colleen E.
O’Brien, assigned to fraud cases, to delay and bury the claims.
41. Secretary of State had invested in ES&S and Dominion voting software and hardware
election-based platforms with the $21M received from Governor DeSantis, and mainly
33 of 256
funded through the federal EAC grant, to secure the 2020 election and protect against
election fraud.
42. Secretary of State Laurel Lee, attorneys Ashley Davis and Colleen O’Brien were aware
Governor DeSantis had plans to run for President in 2024 and that addressing Scott’s
allegations of fraud would not benefit Secretary Lee’s career.
43. Lee, Davis and O’Brien assisted DeSantis in maintaining an image of a fraud-free
election which they saw as a benefit to DeSantis’ career as well as their own.
44. Pursuant Fla. Stat. 112.313, public officials are not allowed to take actions to personally
benefit themselves or others.
45. Pursuant Fla. Stat. 768.28, An officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any of its
subdivisions shall be held personally liable in tort or named as a party defendant in any
action for any injury or damage suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission of
action in the scope of her or his employment or function, when such officer, employee, or
agent acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and
willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
46. Secretary Lee, Ashley Davis and Colleen O’Brien benefited from burying and ignoring
the election fraud which had been presented to them.
47. Attorneys Colleen O’Brien and Deputy Counsel Davis aided in achieving Secretary Lee’s
goal of quashing Scott’s fraud claims because covering the fraud proved more personally
beneficial to Davis and O’Brien than addressing the fraud and because O’Brien believed
Scott would not be able to defend herself against the fraud due to her indigency, which
meant Davis and O’Brien believed that no consequence would be borne by burying the
fraud which had occurred against Scott.
34 of 256
48. Illegal invidious discrimination against Scott was orchestrated and carried out by
Secretary Lee, Davis and O’Brien.
49. Neither the Broward County Supervisor of Elections nor the Palm Beach County
Supervisor of Election had an accurate map of District 22’s boundaries. Scott addressed
this issue with the Supervisor of Elections in both Broward County and Palm Beach
County. (Exhibit 2)
50. Broward County Supervisor of Elections voter database software rejected numerous valid
petitions as ‘Wrong District’ that were, in fact, within the district.
51. Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Peter Antonacci, told Scott she would have to
pay to view the petitions. Supervisor Antonacci was fully aware that Scott is indigent and
knew that forcing her to pay to ensure validity of the petitions would exclude her from
checking the ballots. Antonacci was using Scott’s poverty to ensure Scott could not
inspect fraudulent petitions. Apparently Antonacci’s logic is that only people with money
deserve fair play, everyone else is a sucker who can be treated as poorly as you can get
away with. Antonacci also seemed to think that he could repeatedly suggest to Scott that
they should ‘celebrate’ (Exhibit 7 – email between Antonacci and Scott). The suggestion
came while Scott was waiting to find out if she had enough valid petitions, or not. Scott
declined Antonacci’s suggestion to celebrate and her petitions were rejected. Talk about
an inappropriate Weinstein sibling-wannabe scenario. In accordance with Fla. Stat.
112.313, public officials shall not use their position to benefit themselves or use their
positions in an attempt to extort favors from people. It seems highly unlikely that election
officials are unaware of the fact that candidates are not prey.
35 of 256
52. In Antonacci’s case, it appeared he was saying that Scott should ‘celebrate’ with him.
When she refused, he said that, in accordance with Fla. Stat. 119, she had to pay for
copies of the petitions that she wanted to inspect. In fact, that is not how Fla. Stat. 119
reads. It reads that a person must pay .15 per copy - this is true. But Scott had previously
been told that she could not make copies of the petitions due to the signatures on each
petition. No monies are due when no money is owed. If no copies can be made then no
money is owed for any copies.
53. It is possible that the attorney in Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections office,
Ashley Houlihan, was lying when she informed Scott that Scott could not make copies
based on the fact that signatures were part of the petitions. In such, Houlihan deceived
and misled Scott in an attempt to keep Scott off the ballot. It was an act of fraud. It is a
fact that online documents are supplied in relation to property titles and signatures are
part of those documents.
54. Ms. Houlihan and Amber Sachs, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections employee
who handles candidate petitions were lying when they told Scott in February, that if Scott
wanted to inspect the petitions, Scott would need to pay for a minimum of two full days
at the attorney’s full salary, but that it would probably take longer than two days. That
was a complete lie. That is not what Fla. Stat. 119 says. In fact, there is no charge
associated with viewing the petitions, only .15 per copy. Copies that Scott could not
obtain under any circumstances according to Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
and Broward County Supervisor of Elections.
55. These rogue election officials lied about fake charges, knowing that Scott is indigent, to
make sure she could not inspect the petitions for accuracy. There is no charge to inspect
36 of 256
petitions. There is a charge for copies. Scott did not need copies. So there was no charge.
There is no charge for an employee to be present during inspection of the petitions. Yet,
both Supervisor of Elections offices wanted to impose an exorbitant fee to ensure Scott
would be blocked from inspecting the petitions. This is an act of election fraud
perpetrated by corrupt election officials.
56. Scott believes these rogue election officials were so horrendously rude and inappropriate
with Scott because they knew that if Scott did, in fact, inspect the petitions, fraud would
be found. That is also why Nathaniel Klitsberg repeatedly lied, even though he knew it
was a lie when stating that Scott spent three full days inspecting petitions when, in fact,
Scott spent, at best one-and-a-half days sitting with Daniel Reyes who was inspecting the
petitions. Scott was sorting. Klitsberg is attempting to create a false impression of the
facts to distract and mislead others. That is fraud.
57. The fraud is so rampant in Palm Beach County and Broward County that if the evidence
is looked at the fraud becomes glaringly obvious, which was exactly what happened
when Scott went back to Broward County Supervisor of Elections office on May 11,
2020 to inspect petitions. She found 160 petitions that had never even been entered into
the system, dozens of petitions where the names had been incorrectly entered (David
instead of Paul, sort of mistakes), matching signatures that were rejected, voters living in
the district and properly registered whose petitions were rejected, inactive voters rejected
as ineligible when inactive voters are still able to vote and in such can sign a petition,
which is exactly why Nathaniel Klitsberg attempted to smear Scott, in email, after that
inspection and demanded that Scott pay a temp staff person if Scott wanted to further
inspect the petitions. Klitsberg knew Scott could not afford it (Exhibit 6 – email from
37 of 256
Klitsberg and Scott’s response). He was bullying her, blaming the victim, attempting to
misdirect the attention from the abundance of fraud that was (is) occurring in Broward
County Supervisor of Elections office.
ARGUMENT (2): THE STATE OF FLORIDA FAILED AT ITS DUTY TO REDUCE
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PETITIONS NEEDED TO GAIN BALLOT ACCESS, BY
PETITION, DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, SCOTT WOULD HAVE GAINED
BALLOT ACCESS EVEN WITH THE ELECTION FRAUD PERPETRATED AGAINST
HER, HAD THE GOVERNOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OR DIVISION OF
ELECTIONS REDUCED THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PETITIONS NEEDED, BY ANY
REASONABLE AMOUNT, TO GAIN BALLOT ACCESS, WHICH THE SECRETARY
OF STATE HAD DONE FOR STATE AND LOCAL CANDIDATES
STATE SENATE TURNING POWER OF ELECTION OVER TO GOVERNOR
DESANTIS
58. In April 2020, Scott contacted Florida Senate President Bill Galvano’s office regarding
fraud and the necessity to reduce the number of petitions needed to gain ballot access or
to extend the time to petition (it was not known at that time that COVID-19 would be
problematic for such an extended period of time.) (Exhibit 1 – correspondence between
Senate President Galvano’s Assistant, Ms. Amanda Romant and Candidate Scott between
April 23-25, 2020.)
Scott: ‘...There have been no changes to deadlines under current law for
submission of (federal) candidate qualifying petitions...’
Romant: ‘Please see below for the information provided to our office by the
Department of State... Removes the requirement that the voter’s signature on a
candidate petition be an “original, ink signature” so that signed petitions can be
collected without person-to-person contact.’
Scott: ‘...The Emergency Rules set in place by the Division of Elections which
you forwarded only address State and Local candidates, not Federal Candidates.
The Federal candidate deadline for submitting petitions was March 23, 2020 for
US House of Representatives. I believe State and Local candidates have until June
11 to collect petitions...The Federal candidate deadline to submit petitions to the
38 of 256
Supervisor of Election had passed three weeks prior to the April 6th decision by
the Division of Elections ...the new rules put in place by the Division of Elections
cannot affect a deadline that already passed... It was always my intention to
qualify by petition. I had to stop petitioning early due to the pandemic. The US
Supreme Court sets the bar for petitioning as 'reasonable'. It is not
reasonable to expect a candidate to petition during a pandemic risking both
my life and that of another. The Governor has an obligation to ensure that the
method is fair under the unusual circumstances of the pandemic. I can't pay the
fee... All candidates should have equal access to getting on the ballot. The
ChinaVirus ruined that chance for me by decreasing the total number of petitions
I could collect since I had to stop collecting petitions early since it was unsafe to
collect petitions. A candidate should not have to risk their life or that of others to
get on the ballot...do you know how easy it would have been for me to become a
super spreader(?) I was speaking with about 400 people a day, I'd guess at least
half of whom were over the age of 60-65... The Governor should put an
Emergency Order in place which allows candidates running for the US
House of Representatives a fair chance of getting on the ballot... I've worked
very, very diligently to get enough petitions to get on the ballot. I certainly hope
the Governor will consider cutting the total number of petitions needed so that
those who were working hard to get on the ballot and would have - if it weren't
for the ChinaVirus - still can. Everyone deserves a chance to run!... We need a
strong US House of Representatives....I would represent my District very well.
My constituents deserve the opportunity to vote for me!’
Romant: ‘I will pass your remarks to Governor DeSantis’s office; these
decisions continue to come from the Office of the Governor and not the
Office of the Senate President.’ (Emphasis Added)
Scott: ‘Forgive me, again. You're with State Senate. The same State Senate that I
desperately need to address this issue so that my constitutional right to petition is
not violated. I don't know much about the State Senate beyond the fact that they
have legislative power to right this wrong and that it's controlled by my
party...everyone should have a chance to run... please bring this to the attention of
the State Senators. Our constitutional rights matter. The CoronaVirus has
impacted my ability to get on the ballot directly... this is CoronaVirus related. I
worked very, very hard to get those 6600 signatures (4472 which have been
verified). I am only 434 petitions shy of being on the ballot. About 200+ of those
(maybe all 434 are legit). I should be allot(ed) the additional time to petition to get
the rest of the signatures needed - or someone with authority should go through
the Broward County and Palm Beach County petitions because they are not
accurate (note: After Scott’s final petition inspection, on May 11, 2020, she found
a total of 847 valid petitions had been fraudulently rejected.) Please remember
that it's not about how many people got on the ballot and how they got on the
39 of 256
ballot (meaning by petition or paying the fee). It's a matter of everyone having a
fair chance to get on the ballot, which has not happened in my case.
GOVERNOR DESANTIS REFUSED TO REDUCE PETITION COUNT OR
TAKE ANY OTHER MEASURES TO PROTECT FEDERAL CANDIDATES
PETITIONING TO GAIN BALLOT ACCESS DUE TO COVID-19
59. Beginning on March 11, 2020, Scott began emailing and calling Governor DeSantis’
Office requesting the governor take action to protect federal candidates who intended to
gain ballot access by petition. (Exhibit 4 – email communication regarding COVID-19's
effect on petitioning)
60. Governor DeSantis never implemented any Emergency Orders to protect federal
candidates.
61. Since the Florida congress relied on the governor to address petitioning matters during a
pandemic and the governor refused to implement measures which would reduce the
number of petitions needed to gain ballot access, as so many other states had done, or in
any other meaningful way compensate or make allowances for federal candidates
attempting to gain ballot access by petition, the governor blocked otherwise eligible
candidates from ballot access. As discussed in detail below, a candidate cannot be denied
ballot access if there is no other way, but to pay the fee. In this case, since Scott is an
indigent, there is no other way but to pay the fee. Therefore, Scott was unconstitutionally
deprived of ballot access, which means this court must set aside the election in District 22
and re-hold the election to ensure Scott’s rights as a candidate are protected and District
22 voters are not disenfranchised.
40 of 256
SECRETARY OF STATE LAUREL LEE REFUSED TO REDUCE PETITION COUNT
OR TAKE ANY OTHER MEASURES TO PROTECT FEDERAL CANDIDATES
PETITIONING TO GAIN BALLOT ACCESS DUE TO COVID-19
62. On several occasions Scott contacted the Secretary of State (via email, Exhibit 5 - or
voicemail) to ensure the secretary was aware of the impossibility to safely petition during
a pandemic and the dire need for the Division of Elections (which the Secretary of State
oversees) or the Department of State to take action implement a reasonable alternative to
the continuation of petitioning due to health and safety issues. For federal candidates
running for US House of Representatives, Secretary Lee never took any action at all. A
huge percentage of the people Scott received signatures from were over 65. The Secretary
didn’t care about Scott’s health and safety nor did she care about the wonderful people of
District 22. By the treatment Scott received from the employees at the Division of
Elections, Broward County Supervisor or Elections and Palm Beach County Supervisor
of Elections, it appeared that the election officials were using the pandemic as a way to
weed out those who could not pay the fee.
MARIA MATTHEWS, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ELECTION, REFUSED TO
REDUCE THE PETITION COUNT OR TAKE ANY OTHER REASONABLE
MEASURE TO PROTECT FEDERAL CANDIDATES PETITIONING TO GAIN
BALLOT ACCESS DUE TO COVID-19
63. Ms. Matthews suggested Scott either pay the fee or become a write-in candidate (Exhibit
4).
64. Ms. Matthews either knew or should have known, in her position, that the Supreme Court
ruled that an indigent person must be given ballot access if the only other alternative is to
pay the fee. The Supreme Court did not feel ‘write-in’ was a viable option.
41 of 256
65. Ms. Matthews made no attempt to ensure there was a reasonable option to gain ballot
access besides petitioning due to the extenuating circumstances of the COVID-19
pandemic. (Exhibit 8)
The Equal Protection Clause applies to state specification of qualifications for
elective and appointive office. Although one may “have no right” to be elected or
appointed to an office, all persons “do have a federal constitutional right to be
considered for public service without the burden of invidiously discriminatory
disqualification. The State may not deny to some the privilege of holding public
office that it extends to others on the basis of distinctions that violate federal
constitutional guarantees.”1 In Bullock v. Carter,2 the Court used a somewhat
modified form of the strict test in passing upon a filing fee system for primary
election candidates that imposed the cost of the election wholly on the candidates
and that made no alternative provision for candidates unable to pay the fees; the
reason for application of the standard, however, was that the fee system deprived
some classes of voters of the opportunity to vote for certain candidates and it
worked its classifications along lines of wealth. 3The system itself was voided
because it was not reasonably connected with the state’s interest in regulating the
ballot and did not serve that interest and because the cost of the election could be
met out of the state treasury, thus avoiding the discrimination.
Recognizing the state interest in maintaining a ballot of reasonable length in order
to promote rational voter choice, the Court observed nonetheless that filing fees
alone do not test the genuineness of a candidacy or the extent of voter support for
an aspirant. Therefore, effectuation of the legitimate state interest must be
achieved by means that do not unfairly or unnecessarily burden the party’s or the
candidate’s “important interest in the continued availability of political
opportunity. The interests involved are not merely those of parties or individual
candidates; the voters can assert their preferences only through candidates or
parties or both and it is this broad interest that must be weighed in the balance. . . .
[T]he process of qualifying candidates for a place on the ballot may not
1
Turner v. Fouche, 396 U.S. 346, 362–63 (1970) (voiding a property qualification for appointment to local school board). See also Chappelle v. Greater Baton Rouge Airport Dist., 431 U.S. 159 (1977) (voiding a qualification for appointment as airport commissioner of ownership of real or personal property that is assessed for taxes in the jurisdiction in which airport is located); Quinn v. Millsap, 491 U.S. 95 (1989) (voiding property ownership requirement for appointment to board authorized to propose
reorganization of local government). Cf. Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 (1944). 2
405 U.S. 134, 142–44 (1972). 3 405 U.S. at 144–49.
42 of 256
constitutionally be measured solely in dollars.”4 In the absence of reasonable
alternative means of ballot access, the Court held, a state may not disqualify an
indigent candidate unable to pay filing fees.
Concurring, Justices Blackmun and Rehnquist suggested that a reasonable
alternative would be to permit indigents to seek write-in votes without paying a
filing fee, 415 U.S. at 722, but the Court indicated this would be inadequate. Id. at
719 n.5.
ARGUMENT (3) SINCE THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY FOR SCOTT TO GAIN
BALLOT ACCESS BUT TO PAY THE FEE, SCOTT HAD A RIGHT TO BALLOT
ACCESS, AS A PROTECTED CLASS DUE TO HER INDIGENT STATUS: THE
STATE’S REFUSAL TO PLACE SCOTT ON THE BALLOT AS A PROTECTED
CLASS DEPRIVED SCOTT OF HER RIGHT TO BALLOT ACCESS AND
DISENFRANCHISED A HALF MILLION VOTERS IN DISTRICT 22
66. Scott is indigent.
67. Scott is a US citizen.
68. Scott is a Florida resident.
69. Scott is a District 22 candidate for US House of Representatives during the 2020 Election
Cycle.
70. Scott has been a Florida resident for 17 years.
71. Scott properly submitted all of her 2020 US House qualifying documents to the Florida
Division of Elections in a timely manner before the deadline.
72. Scott submitted over 6600 petitions to the Supervisors of Elections of Broward and Palm
Beach County combined.
73. Scott could not afford to pay the qualifying fee.
74. Scott submitted at least 507 more valid petitions then needed to gain ballot access.
4 Lubin v. Panish, 415 U.S. 709, 716 (1974).
43 of 256
75. Broward County Supervisor of Elections and Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
rejected over 1300 petitions.
76. At least 847 of those rejected petitions were valid.
77. Scott had removed and discarded most of the petitions that were obviously not going to
be accepted – such as if a petition was not fully filled out, signed or dated.
78. Scott had collected, culled, then discarded at least 1100-2000 incomplete petitions.
79. Scott obtained nearly all of the petitions herself – one-by-one, one person at a time.
80. Scott obtained a modicum of support from registered voters in her district.
81. Fraud (illegal rejection of valid petitions plus refusal to count at least 189 additional
petitions at all, but rather shoving them to the bottom of the rejected pile without every
entering them into the computer system) prevented Scott from gaining ballot access by
petitions.
82. Scott had obtained and submitted enough valid petitions before the coronavirus pandemic
forced her to stop petitioning.
83. It was fraud by the Supervisor of Elections in Broward County and Palm Beach Count
that kept Scott off the ballot.
84. Scott would have continued to collect more ballots, even in the face of the rampant fraud
by both county supervisors of elections and their staff, if it had not been for the risk to her
own safety due to the coronavirus pandemic.
85. Scott had encountered multiple people who were very sick and warned Scott to stay away
because whatever they had they didn’t want to give anyone because it was so bad.
86. Scott got sick, very sick.
44 of 256
87. As a certain point it was simply not safe for Scott to petition. It was not safe for her. It
was not necessarily safe for others. No one knew what the sickness was exactly, or how
easy it was to cure or catch.
88. Scott was concerned about giving the sickness to elderly people.
89. Many elderly people were fantastic about signing Scott’s petitions and true patriots.
90. Scott was not will to risk being a carrier, not knowing she was sick and potentially
getting another sick, particularly the older and more vulnerable population.
91. Scott stopped petitioning to protect herself and others from potentially catching and/or
spreading the virus.
92. Scott was encountering approximately 400 people a day when she petitioned.
93. The risk of becoming a super-spreader was too high.
94. Scott was right to stop petitioning.
95. Scott had a moral and civic duty to stop petitioning early due to the coronavirus outbreak.
96. Governor DeSantis, Secretary Lee and the Florida State Legislatures had a duty to ensure
that petitioning was safe or that Scott was placed on the ballot due to her indigency since
she was forced to stop petitioning due to the pandemic.
97. Governor DeSantis, Secretary Lee, Attorney General Moody, Attorney McVay, Attorney
Davis and Attorney O’Brien had a responsibility to looking into the election fraud issues
and ensure that every eligible candidate made it on the ballot.
98. Florida Division of Elections Director Maria Matthews accepted, confirmed and
uploaded Scott’s candidate qualifying documents acknowledging that Scott had
submitted all necessary qualifying documents before the qualifying deadline had passed.
45 of 256
99. Scott’s status as an indigent falls under the category of protected class because she had no
other way to gain ballot access but to pay the fee since petitioning became unrealistic
during the pandemic.
100. [T]he process of qualifying candidates for a place on the ballot may not
constitutionally be measured solely in dollars.” (Lubin v. Panish, 415 U.S. 709, 716
(1974). In the absence of reasonable alternative means of ballot access, the Court
held, a state may not disqualify an indigent candidate unable to pay filing fees.
101. As oath keepers, Governor DeSantis, Secretary Lee, Attorney Davis and Attorney
O’Brien each had an obligation to ensure Scott’s constitutional rights were upheld by
placing her on the ballot since there was no other alternative for her to gain ballot access
during the pandemic other than to pay the fee.
102. As attorneys, Governor DeSantis, Secretary Lee, Attorney Davis and Attorney
O’Brien each has an obligation to know and abide by the US Constitution, the laws of the
United States, the Florida Constitution and the Florida statutes which dictated that she be
placed on the ballot since there was no other safe and reasonable way for her to gain
ballot access during a pandemic other than to pay, which was not an option for Scott due
to her status as an indigent.
103. Scott’s name should have been placed on the ballot.
104. Due to fraud, misconduct and public corruption, Scott was illegally and
unconstitutionally deprived of her right to ballot access.
105. Congressional District 22 voters were disenfranchised by not being allowed the
opportunity to vote for every eligible and qualified candidate.
106. Fraud vitiates everything. (See Judicial Notice - Supreme Court Case Law)
46 of 256
VOTER MACHINE FRAUD PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED BY SCOTT AT POLL
STATION WHERE SCOTT VOTED IN BROWARD COUNTY
107. When Scott was at the poll to vote in the General Election. The voting machine
which Scott inserted her ballot into and supposedly read the ballot count did not appear to
switch the count number after Scott entered the ballot.
108. Scott had requested a vote-by-mail ballot, just in case she wasn’t able to make it
to the polls.
109. The poll worker who took Scott’s ID to validate her voter information had Scott
write her signature on a blank rectangular piece of paper which seemed odd and which
she was very uncomfortable with. Scott was not sure if he put the signature back into the
machine. It would be quite easy for a poll worker, or other, to take Scott’s signature and
fraudulently sign her name on a separate ballot filling in the ballot as the fraudulent
individual so chose.
110. The poll worker specifically inquired as to whether or not Scott had voted by mail
already. Scott said she had not. The poll worker then specifically told Scott that she
couldn’t vote using the vote-by-mail ballot which she agreed to.
111. I believe at poll votes are not counted when the person also ordered a vote-by-
mail ballot and that the hackers then use the signature given to the poll worker to
electronically sign the mail-in ballot and the actual in-person ballot is never calculated,
which explains why the computer did not increase its total vote count when Scott entered
her in-person ballot into the machine.
112. In this scenario, there would be no way to ensure the accuracy of the ballot.
Therefore, the group of in-person voters who also requested mail-in ballots, it appears,
were having their votes fraudulently switched to Biden votes, with a full Democrat ticket
47 of 256
filled out which ensured the US House seats to Democrats, in US House districts located,
at least in part, in Broward County. The hack did not guarantee a Biden win because this
only happened in certain counties, but it was enough to ensure several federal, state and
local seats that could have gone red, did not. Combined with the wide-spread fraud that
has occurred throughout the country during this election cycle, the election fraud at a
federal level for US House seats could impact which party runs the US House over the
next two years. This fact is not inconsequential. In fact, it is substantial enough to set
aside the election, hold a new election and rule that the election must be manual in every
way. No electronic voting. No electronic count of votes. No storing the information of
votes online. Only hand counting ballots, which would surely take less time than what is
currently occurring in other parts of the country.
113. Scott personally spoke with well over 26K people, in District 22, while she was
petitioning. Broward County is definitely not solid blue. If it is blue at all, it is barely
blue. Scott believes the mail-in ballots were used to cast ‘blue’ votes by ‘red’ people.
This strategy perpetuates the myth that District 22 is blue. It also circumvents any future
questioning if the votes are tampered with to ensure fake democratic win.
114. By switching the vote at the poll, in the way described above, the voters are
legitimate. They are citizens. They are alive. It would be difficult to track this sort of
nefarious election fraud because it is a complicated scheme.
115. The ballots should be hand counted to ensure the count was not switched online.
The same exact total would remain as actually happened, less any nefarious election
fraud elsewhere. Only the vote would have been switched.
48 of 256
116. Marc Andreessen, of Andreessen Horowitz, one of the top tech investment groups
in the world, owns a home on Palm Beach.
117. Scott has had interactions from hackers with an acquaintance to Horowitz. These
are not intentional interactions but rather more like stalking hackers invading Scott’s
space for nefarious purposes.
118. Scott believes Andreessen is a hardcore far left Democrat and globalist.
119. Scott knows of Andreessen because he’s had people attempt to steal intellectual
property from Scott.
120. There are enough local new world order types in the local vicinity with the
capability of creating the sophisticated hack Scott described above. It’s a simple hack to
implement as long as the players are in place. The (Eastern European) poll worker, mixed
with the loud clapping and distractions through the process of him taking my signature
and distracting Scott after she signed the blank paper (distraction was loud clapping and
noises for a ‘first time voter’) brings enough question into the scenario where it would be
appropriate to hand-count the ballots.
121. Scott believes Marc Andreessen is a CIA (deep state) asset due to her personal
experience and his ties to DARPA and certain tech projects and monopolies.
122. The CIA, by law, is allowed to invest in projects using fake names. Therefore, if
they invest in Uber, the CIA would use a name like ‘Joe’s Investment Group’...or Marc
Andreessen, rather than as the CIA.
123. To the best of my knowledge and understanding, Andreessen has been involved in
local hacking projects that encourage the growth of hackers in the immediate area.
124. Voter fraud would be a fine area for them to perfect their skills.
49 of 256
125. A hand-count would show the true ballot count, relating to this one particular
hack and form of voter fraud.
126. If there are visual imprints of the ballots, such graphics could perhaps (if not
switched out, which is very possible and likely if connected to the internet and not saved
on a separate device not connected to the internet, preferably at least two separate
backups in case one backup is immediately updated and switched out as soon as it is
pulled into a device connected to the internet) be used to cross-check a valid vote count.
127. Unless the fraud is eliminated, it will not go away.
128. The fraud will not be eliminated unless specific action is taken to weed it out.
129. In Florida, the 2020 General Election was merely used as a test run for future
elections simply because it was not needed in the election this year and other swing states
were used. That does not mean Florida did not prepare to use Florida in the nationwide
voter fraud schemes. It more likely means that Trump’s promise to fire DeSantis was
enough to deter voter fraud criminals from using Florida as one of their states they chose
to flip.
WIDESPREAD VOTER MACHINE FRAUD IN FLORIDA
130. No votes, in Florida, were counted.
131. The appearance of votes being counted exists in fabricated ‘Total’ votes.
132. The fabricated ‘Total’ votes are not based on an equation stemming from the
precinct level break down of per column vote totals. (ie. Early Voting, Election Day
Voting, Vote By Mail, Provisional)
50 of 256
133. It is not possible to obtain an accurate total of votes at a candidate or precinct
level without counting the votes from the four columns mentioned above (ie. Early
Voting, Election Day Voting, Vote By Mail, Provisional)
134. The four columns (ie. Early Voting, Election Day Voting, Vote By Mail,
Provisional) are the equation, per candidate, per precinct.
135. The ‘Total’ votes per precinct are based soley on the sum of the equation which is
derived solely from the four columns - ‘Election Day’, ‘Early Votes’, ‘Vote By Mail’ and
‘Provisional’.
136.
137. ‘Total’s (the ‘sum’) were entered at a state, county and precinct level without first
calculating/tabulation the precinct level four column equations from which the precent
level votes are derived, then which are calculated/tabulated to arrive at the county level
sum, per candidate, then sent to the Secretary of State/Division of Elections to tally the
total votes for the state based on the county-level totals, based on the precinct-level totals
which are based on the four column precinct level totals.
138. The proper methodology to calculate and tabulate votes did not occur.
139. All voters were duped and their vote was stolen, no matter party affiliation.
140. Fraudsters based precinct and candidate totals on publicly available total voting
population data, for the county and for the precinct.
141. The excessive promotion of the notoriously insecure voting option of voting by
mail was heavily encouraged and promoted by a variety of sources/avenues, such as
Facebook, CTCL via funds poured into local elections by way of 11 Florida Supervisors
of Elections accepting over $17M combined.
51 of 256
142. In Palm Beach County CTCL funds were used to acquire ‘Drive-By Ballot Drop
Off Vans’ which were so insecure and received so much public outrage and concern that
the vans were discontinued... but they were discontinued too late. The damage had been
done.
143. Vote By Mail Ballots had party affiliation printed on the outside of the envelope
which made the ballots vulnerable to interception, theft and destruction.
144. The majority of poll workers – approximately 80% or more - were Democrats.
145. Cameras were not installed in the Vote By Mail Drive-By Ballot Drop Off Vans.
146. There is no way to know whether the chain of custody relating to ballots being
dropped off was broken due to the unsecured and transient nature of the Mail Ballot
Drive By Drop Off vans.
147. The fact that Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections ended her ‘Mail Ballot
Drive By Drop Off’ campaign early in is an admission that she knew the program
violated the rights of voters by using an unsecure and unapproved method to gather
petitions.
148. Due to this admission of method of illegal ballot gathering tactics, the chain of
custody has been broken, the election should never have been certified and must be de-
certified since there is no way to separate the Mail Ballot Drive By Drop Off van ballots
from other ballots received by Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections due to there
being no chain of custody.
149. The total number of ballots obtained by the Mail Ballot Drive By Drop Off ballot
vans is unknown and cannot be officially verified which poisons the validity of the ballot
results forcing the need for a new election.
52 of 256
150. It is unclear how secure the Mail Ballot Drive By Drop Off ballot boxes are and
whether or not, even if a voter puts his/her ballot in the box himself/herself, if at a later
time that box could simply be flipped over allowing the ballot to be removed by a bad
actor either before, during or after the time the van returned to the Palm Beach County
Supervisor of Elections office.
151. It is unclear if the Mail Ballot Drive By Drop Off ballot van drive returned the
van to the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections office each evening,; if so, if the
van was stored in a safe location; if so, if the ballots were removed from the van each
night; if so, by whom. There is no verification that the chain of custody was not broken.
In such, there is no way to verify the validity of these ballots. This faux pas demands the
election be de-certified and held a new because there is doubt if the will of the voter was
expressed during the 2020 Election cycle.
152. CTCL money, which in large part was funded by Mark Zuckerberg via his charity
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, funded the Vote By Mail Drive-By Ballot Drop Off Vans.
153. Palm Beach County refused to give Scott the employee list for the Vote By Mail
Drive-By Vans, in its entirety, which violated the Florida Constitution which gives every
citizen of Florida access to public records. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections,
as well as her employees Ashley Houlihan, Anne and Amber refused to give Scott access
to the documents unless she paid (really high prices) for them, which they knew Scott
could not afford due to her indigency. The Supervisor and her staff refused to give Scott
hardship paperwork in lieu of paying the fee. The Supervisor and her staff knew they
were violating Scott’s Constitutional rights because Scott told them she had a
constitutional right to the documents.
53 of 256
154. The media promoted and encouraged Vote By Mail due to the pandemic.
155. The pandemic was a biological attack created in a lab in the Province of Wuhan,
China.
156. China used the biological attack as a way to encourage the promotion of Vote By
Mail ballots.
157. China worked in tandum with a small group who were promoting the
CoronaVirus lies to the public to scare them to stay home and vote from home.
158. CoronaVirus is real. The threat to one’s health is not nearly as dramatic and
deadly as was claimed before the 2020 election cycle.
159. The fake news regarding the danger of CoronaVirus was to scare people into
staying home and voting by mail.
160. Christine Scott was sick from the CoronaVirus. It made it very hard for her to
breath for two breaths. She had never experienced anything like it. She believes that
illness was, in fact, manufactured as a form of biological warfare. The facts on the virus
were not out yet. She only knew that she couldn’t breathe when she got sick, that many
she had encountered, while petitioning, were very sick and that she didn’t want to get
anyone else sick particularly since we knew the virus was a man-made attack coming out
of a Chinese bioweapons lab and China was attempting to get rid of Trump to curb his
fair and just tariffs. Scott was sick for two days. She took vitamins and sleep. Then she
was better. Many of the people Scott encountered were frail older voters. There was no
way Scott wanted to get them sick, if she could be a carrier of the virus. To this day, Scott
does not know if she could have carried the virus, but when Scott was petitioning, it was
early on in our knowledge of and experience with the coronavirus and we didn’t know
54 of 256
what the bioweapon was or was not capable of. Scott protected the people first. The
Governor, Secretary of State and the Director of the Division of Elections had the same
duty to Scott that Scott had to the people... if not more so, since these people worked for
the People whereas Scott was merely attempting to acquire the ability to do so.
161. The extra ballots collected - due to biological weapon of war inflicted upon
Floridians, mixed with the unnecessary terror and anxiety thrust upon people by the
mainstream media, the illegal infiltration of $17M from Mark Zuckerberg poured into the
Florida Election cycle ($6.8M accepted by Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
Wendy Sartory Link and $1.4M accepted by then-Broward County Supervisor of
Elections Peter Antonacci) - were used to switch out real votes for fraudulent votes.
162. The abundance of promotion to vote by mail was meant not only to increase the
actual vote by mail count, which is generally more democratically leaning, but also to
give the appearance that more people voted by mail. This would allow fraudulent votes
to be inserted into the Vote By Mail column without a level of scrutiny that would exist if
no promotion and touted ‘need’ due to the pandemic existed.
163. Trump voters do not tend to trust voting by mail.
164. Voting by mail has a long history of being used as a means of inserting fraud
ballots into an election.
165. There is often not a clear chain of custody protecting vote by mail ballots.
166. All of the Drive-By Drop off Ballot van ballots should be invalidated due to the
lack of security attached to the ballots, the lack of a chain of custody, the conflict of
interest in the Drive-By Drop off Ballot van employees being hired with ‘ZuckerBucks’,
the PBCSOE refusing to give detailed records relating to those employees and in such
55 of 256
refusing to prove the Drive-By Drop off Ballot van ‘poll workers’ were actually legal
residents of Palm Beach County and registered to vote within the county.
167. There were no district maps with exact lines as to where the district started and
ended which allowed online manipulation of those votes and Scott’s signed petitions.
Many of those voters within a couple blocks of the district boundary on Ted Deutch’s
map, which Amber Sachs said is the most accurate map of the district she has seen and
that the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections does not have a map of the district,
were marked as out of the district when they were actually in the district, which shows
voter software fraud manipulation and hacking.
168. Since the voter software system was hacked (either locally or remotely) to
invalidate several of Scott’s valid petitions, reasonable doubt is placed on the validity of
the voter software system used during the 2020 Primary, Presidential Primary and
General Elections.
169. Once the November 3, 2020 vote transfer left the Secretary of State’s office and
was in route to D.C., it was intercepted, re-routed to China, switched out with vote totals
installed by the Chinese Communist Party, then re-routed back to D.C.
170. China used Hammer and Scorecard.
171. China bought Hammer and Scorecard from Former FBI Director Comey.
(https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2021/01/they-have-taken-control-gen-thomas-
mcinerneys-update-about-jan-6-event-in-washington-dc/)
172. The fact that Comey stole from the People of the United States Hammer and
Scorecard, which he then sold to China, which China then used to manipulate the results
of the Florida elections, in and of itself creates enough doubt in the 2020 election cycle
56 of 256
and the chain of custody relating to secure online transfer of vote totals and tabulations to
demand a new election be held in Florida, without the expensive undertaking of a
Forensic Audit, for the simple reason that an election should be set aside when a court
finds substantial non-compliance with a statutory election procedure and also makes a
factual determination that reasonable doubt exists as to whether a certified election
expressed the will of the voters.
173. Disgraced Former FBI Director James Comey’s act against the State of Florida
and the United States of American was an act of treason. On the morning of June 29,
2021, James Comey former FBI Director James Comey died of natural causes; his heart
stopped beating after a guillotine blade severed his head.
(https://realrawnews.com/2021/06/james-comey-loses-his-head-to-guillotine/)
174. Due to widespread voter machine fraud throughout the state of Florida and
specifically in Palm Beach County and Broward County, reasonable doubt exists as to
whether a certified election expressed the will of the voters, in such, the election should
be set aside. See Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing Board by and through Harris,
253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).
175. The 2020 election much be de-certified based on widespread voter machine fraud,
in Florida.
176. Fraud vitiates everything.
177. Reasonable doubt exists that the will of the voter was represented during the 2020
election cycle.
178. Since reasonable doubt exists that the will of the voter was represented during the
2020 election cycle, the election must be set aside and held anew.
57 of 256
TENS OF THOUSANDS OF VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA ELECTION STATUTES
EXIST AT A PRECINCT LEVEL THROUGHOUT FLORIDA
179. There are literally tens of thousands of violations, of Florida Election Statute
98.0981(2)(a) throughout Florida (Judicial Notice – Facts L)
180. There are tens of thousands of violations, of Florida Election Statute
98.0981(2)(a) in Palm Beach County alone. (Judicial Notice – Facts L)
181. Tens of thousands of violations of Florida statutes is substantial non-compliance
with a statutory election procedure necessitating the 2020 Election cycle be de-certified
and the election be held anew.
182. An election should be set aside if a court finds substantial non-compliance
with a statutory election procedure. See Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing Board
by and through Harris, 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
PALM BEACH COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS CONNECTED TO SERVERS
LOCATED OUTSIDE THE US IN CONNECTION WITH THE 2020 GENERAL
ELECTION TALLIES
183. The servers used in connection with the Palm Beach County Supervisor of
Elections are based outside the United States. (Exhibit 9) This means a developer/hacker
from outside the United States has the ability to access, alter, switch, manipulate and/or
destroy voting records or information that is kept online.
184. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections keeps all of their voting record data
online.
58 of 256
185. The custom setting for the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections internet
connections are set for Germany, UK, Russia, India, China, Brazil, Turkey, Mountain
View, CA and San Francisco, CA.
186. The Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link allowed
foreign interference in Palm Beach County’s 2020 Election cycle.
187. The one above fact is enough evidence of foul play to warrant a hand-count of the
election or to simply set aside the election results pertaining to US House seats.
188. The Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections did not properly secure her
servers to ensure the integrity of voter data for the 2020 General Election.
189. The Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections should be impeached for
incompetence.
190. Foreign interference in the Palm Beach County 2020 Election cycle is substantial
non-compliance with a statutory election procedure warranting the necessity that the
2020 Palm Beach County Election be set aside and held anew.
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEM AND ES&S DIRECT AND INDIRECT
VULNERABILITIES AND FRAUD PUT INTO QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF THE 27
ELECTED OFFICIALS PLACED INTO THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SEATS AS WELL AS THE DOWN BALLOT THROUGHOUT ALL 67 COUNTIES IN
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
191. The Dominion Voting System software was used in 18 counties throughout
Florida elections, in the Primary, Presidential Primary and General Elections, in 2020.
(Judicial Notice Facts – L)
192. Scott alleges Dominion was used to fraudulently alter, delete and manipulate
votes in the US House of Representative elections, in Florida.
193. Scott alleges the ES&S was used in the other 49 Florida counties.
59 of 256
194. ES&S and Dominion use the same base software.
195. ES&S and Dominion both use SCYTL.
196. ES&S and Dominion both use SQL Server.
197. Votes can be altered and manipulated at a local level using SQL Serve which
means both voting systems – ES&S and Dominion – where not secure during the 2020
Election cycle indicating substantial non-compliance with a statutory election procedure
warranting the election be de-certified and held anew because it did not express the will
of the voters. ‘Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing Board by and through Harris’
198. Scott alleges there is no way of confirming a valid vote count in District 22, Palm
Beach County, Broward County, or Florida as a whole, due to the use of ES&S.
199. Scott alleges the election within the counties of Broward and Palm Beach show
enough widespread election fraud, misconduct and corruption to put in question the
integrity of all six US House seats (District 18, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24) held within those
two counties, strictly based on the rampant election fraud she personally experienced, as
stated throughout this document, in other documents filed in this case, as well as in the
facts supplied in the Judicial Notice).
200. The fraud, in Florida is rampant in the down ballot.
201. Dominion and ES&S were created to interfere with fair elections.
202. The version of ES&S used during the 2020 election cycle was not certified by
EAC. In such, it should not have been certified by Florida’s Secretary of State or used
during the 2020 election cycle in Florida.
203. Scott believes the numbers in the Presidential Election within the State of Florida
were manipulated by Dominion & ES&S, as well as by local hackers with SQL Server
60 of 256
access. Scott’s main contention is not contesting the Presidential election. President
Trump honestly won the State of Florida. Although, Scott alleges Trump won it by
substantially more votes than are recorded.
204. The purpose for the appearance of a ‘slight’ margin of victory would be to
decrease skepticism if votes need to be altered during the next presidential election to
fraudulently determine the outcome in a particular direction, if a Democratic Presidential
Candidate is lacking in luster at the polls.
205. The same Dominion and ES&S fraudulent win could occur for a Republican
candidate, such as DeSantis, if we do not address and halt the fraud currently.
206. A slight lead in this election rather than a landslide, based on a fraudulent count,
would help to maintain a narrative in a future election that a race is closer than it really is
in a given county, district or state. The impact of such a fraud can be substantial. It is not
frivolous. The repercussions can affect the entire results of an election, whether it be
local, state or federal. Federal election fraud can impact the entire country and the
decisions that branch of government makes, whether it be the legislative branch or the
executive branch.
207. During the process of the Presidential Campaign, Florida was considered a swing
state.
208. Trump, having advance inside information (intelligence) relating to election
fraud/ballot fraud issues – coincidence or not – warned Governor DeSantis that if Trump
lost the election, he would find a way to fire Gov. DeSantis.
209. Over the past few weeks, we, as a nation, have uncovered widespread corruption
on both sides of the isle, in swing states, in relation to kickbacks from China for using the
61 of 256
Dominion software. This raises grave concerns due to the extreme election fraud, public
corruption and misconduct which Scott personally experienced throughout her campaign
from the Supervisor of Election level on up to the Governor’s refusal to address the fraud,
topped off with Governor DeSantis’ self-praise of false claims that there was no election
fraud this year, while having been fully informed, by Scott through the Governor’s staff,
that it was rampant in the Supervisor of Elections offices in Broward County and Palm
Beach County.
210. It appears Governor DeSantis’ Nov. 4, 2020 press conference
(https://thefloridachannel.org/videos/11-4-20-press-conference-on-elections/) was, in
part, an early pitch for a 2024 Presidential run, which brings us to an absolute need to
squelch any and all election fraud now, in Florida, to ensure our democracy for years to
come. Honest elections cannot happen by burying the fraud that took place, in Florida’s
2020 General Election by way of a few corrupt election officials and the unsecured and
vulnerable ES&S and Dominion voting systems.
211. In Sidney Powell, Nov. 25, 2020, Complaint filed in Michigan
(https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf),
she describes the problem with the Dominion software as follows:
a. The same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud...large[ly] occurred in all the
swing states with only minor variations in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and
Wisconsin...
b. 50 U.S.C. § 20701 requires Retention and preservation of records and papers by
officers of elections; deposit with custodian; penalty for violation, but as will be
shown wide-pattern of misconduct with ballots show preservation of election
62 of 256
records have not been kept; and Dominion logs are only voluntary, with no
system wide preservation system. Without an incorruptible audit log, there is
no acceptable system.
c. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting
Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) ...The Dominion systems derive from the
software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the
United States.
d. Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to
ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was
needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another
election. See Exh. 1, Redacted Declaration of Dominion Venezuela
Whistleblower (“Dominion Whistleblower Report”). Notably, Chavez “won”
every election thereafter.
e. As set forth in the Dominion Whistleblower Report, the Smartmatic software was
contrived through a criminal conspiracy to manipulate Venezuelan elections in
favor of dictator Hugo Chavez: Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation
and operation of an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company
known as Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan
government. This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias,
the person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge Rodriguez,
and principals, representatives, and personnel from Smartmatic. The purpose of
this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system that could change
the votes in elections from votes against persons running the Venezuelan
63 of 256
government to votes in their favor in order to maintain control of the
government. (emphasis added – Scott is alleging Governor DeSantis is setting up
the Dominion system to manipulate a similar coup in a future presidential run and
through his appointments kickbacks and bribes, he is setting up his team to secure
such a win.) In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits for elected officials, including
the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This permitted Hugo Chavez
to be re-elected an unlimited number of times. . . . Smartmatic’s electoral
technology was called “Sistema de Gestión Electoral” (the “Electoral
Management System”). Smartmatic was a pioneer in this area of computing
systems. Their system provided for transmission of voting data over the internet
to a computerized central tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had
a digital display, fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed
out the voter’s ballot. The voter’s thumbprint was linked to a computerized record
of that voter’s identity. Smartmatic created and operated the entire system. Id. ¶¶
10 & 14.
f. A core requirement of the Smartmatic software design ultimately adopted by
Dominion for the Michigan’s elections was the software’s ability to hide its
manipulation of votes from any audit.(emphasis added – Since the Dominion
software was used in Florida, there is no way of knowing whether or not it was
used to manipulate the results of Florida’s 27 US House seats.) As the
whistleblower explains:
64 of 256
i. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that
the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He
wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter
were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the
thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as
having voted, but that voter would not [be] tracked to the changed vote.
He made it clear that the system would have to be setup to not leave any
evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would be
no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the
fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic
agreed to create such a system and produced the software and hardware
that accomplished that result for President Chavez.Id. ¶15. (emphasis
added)
g. The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple
audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes. First, the
system's central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that
maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key
components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially this allows an
unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log
entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting
tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of
the people. See Exh. 107, August 24, 2020 Declaration of HarriHursti, ¶¶45-48).
(emphasis added)
65 of 256
h. Indeed, under the professional standards within the industry in auditing and
forensic analysis, when a log is unprotected, and can be altered, it can no
longer serve the purpose of an audit log. There is incontrovertible physical
evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the
software were breached, and machines were connected to the internet in violation
of professional standards, which violates federal election law on the preservation
of evidence. (emphasis added)
i. In deciding to award Dominion a $25 million, ten-year contract (emphasis
added – Question by Scott: Did the $21 million Governor DeSantis allocated to
Secretary of State, Laurel Lee, fund the use of Dominion, in Florida? Discovery is
necessary) (to a Dominion project team led by Kelly Garrett, former Deputy
Director of the Michigan Democratic Party), and then certifying Dominion
software, Michigan officials disregarded all the concerns that caused Dominion
software to be rejected by the Texas Board of elections in 2018 because it was
deemed vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable manipulation. An industry
expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of Computer Science and Election
Security Expert has recently observed, with reference to Dominion Voting
machines: "I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program
that just before the polls were closed, it switches some votes around from one
candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip
and now to hack a voting machine you just need 7 minutes alone with it and
a screwdriver." (Andrew W. Appel, et al., “Ballot Marking Devices (BMDs)
66 of 256
Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters” at (Dec. 27, 2019), attached hereto as
Exhibit 2 (“Appel Study”). (emphasis added)
j. Plaintiff’s expert witness, Russell James Ramsland, Jr. (Exh. 101, “Ramsland
Affidavit”), has concluded that Dominion alone is responsible for the
injection, or fabrication, of 289,866 illegal votes in Michigan, that must be
disregarded. This is almost twice the number of Mr. Biden’s purported lead in the
Michigan vote (without consideration of the additional illegal, ineligible,
duplicate or fictitious votes due to the unlawful conduct outlined below), and
thus by itself is grounds to set aside the 2020 General Election and grant the
declaratory and injunctive relief requested herein. (emphasis added)
212. An election must be legally held. It does not appear that the outcome of the
Presidential election would be altered by a recount. The question lies within the validity
of the US House seats within Florida and all other seats on the ballot throughout the State
of Florida.
213. From what Scott personally experienced by election officials in both Broward
County and Palm Beach County, she believes US House elections for the six seats
mentioned above cannot be confirmed as honestly counted through means of software
manipulation, by the use of ES&S, as well as multiple other nefariously manipulative
ploys by local and state election officials. It is grounds to set aside the 2020 General
Election.
214. Dominion Voting Systems is a foreign-owned corporation.
215. Dominion Voting Systems is headquartered in Canada.
67 of 256
216. Dominion Voting Systems has three board members who are Chinese nationals
and party of the Chinese Communist Party.
217. Dominion Voting Systems was a foreign company interfering with US elections.
218. ES&S has an office located in Serbia.
219. ES&S’ Serbian office employs Serbian coders who code the US election
machines.
220. Serbia is a foreign country.
221. Serbian coders have interfered with U.S. elections.
222. ES&S has hired foreigners to code software that runs U.S. elections. (Judicial
Notice – Facts)
223. Foreign interference with U.S. elections has occurred due to action taken by
ES&S.
224. Substantial non-compliance with Florida election statutory procedure has
occurred by way of foreign interference by ES&S allowing U.S. election code to be
created by foreigners on foreign soil. In such reasonable doubt exists as to whether the
certified 2020 Election cycle expressed the will of the voters. See ‘Kinney v. Putnam’
225. No breakdown of votes (Election Day, Early Voting, Vote By Mail, Provisional)
were recorded in the official precinct-level raw data supplied by the Division of Elections
for the 2020 Election cycle. (https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/data-statistics/elections-
data/precinct-level-election-results/) This is the same data used at a local precinct level,
which means the vote breakdown, per column (Election Day, Early Voting, Vote By
Mail, Provisional) was never recorded at a state or local level. Without a record and paper
trail of the breakdown of the vote count, anyone with access and desire can alter, change
68 of 256
and manipulate the vote to indicate any candidate won based on their particular desired
candidate(s). In such, reasonable doubt exists as to whether the certified 2020 election
cycle represented the will of the voters. “Kinney v. Putnam”
226. China used its influence over Dominion Voting Systems to interfered with U.S.
elections.
227. Dominion Voting Systems and ES&S allowed votes to be changed, altered and
switched out on SQL Server.
228. SQL Server is a Microsoft product.
229. Blackrock is the largest shareholder in Microsoft.
230. Microsoft is responsible for the use of its product when operated on a global level
to influence a global takeover of the U.S. election.
231. Since no votes were logged by the Secretary of State, there were no legal votes
that could have been certified.
232. Blackrock, being the largest shareholder in Microsoft, is partially responsible for
the illegal global interference with U.S. elections.
233. Bill Gates is the founder of Microsoft.
234. Bill Gates has stock in Pfizer.
235. Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have a patent on the CoronaVirus vaccine.
236. Bill Gates made approximately $10B from the sale of vaccines relating to the
coronavirus bioweapon.
237. Bill Gates has a patent on the CoronaVirus.
238. Anthony Fauci supplied funding to the Wuhan Lab from which the CoronaVirus
originated.
69 of 256
239. CoronaVirus was used by China as a bioweapon to keep voters away from polling
locations and to vote by mail instead.
240. The CoronaVirus was an attack on our Florida and U.S. elections to prevent
Donald J. Trump from getting back in office.
241. China, Bill Gates, Dominion Voting Systems, ES&S and others stole the legal
votes from Floridians and replaced them with fraudulent votes cast for several installed
candidates, which did not reflect the will of the voters, in Florida.
242. 2020 Presidential Incumbent Donld J. Trump posed a very serious threat to
China’s economic future by forcing China to pay (reciprocal) tariffs, by stemming the
theft of U.S. intellectual property, same standards for Chinese companies trading on the
U.S. exchange as for U.S. companies, by bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., but
supporting Taiwan’s independence, etc., to which China’s response was to rig the U.S.
2020 election to ensure Trump would not return to office and in such ensuring China’s
economic future. China is always cash poor. It steals from Paul to pay Mary. Its attempts
to boost the Yuan have been unsuccessful. Its economy is based on stealing U.S. jobs,
businesses and intellectual property. Nothing stood in its way until Trump became
president.
243. Electonic voting machines and software can be hacked through a cyber-attack,
thereby allowing data flowing through devices to be manipulated, stolen or altered.
(Lindell v. Dominion, Case 0:21-cv-01332 filed 06/03/21, U.S.D.C., District of
Minnesota)
244. It is indisputable that the electronic voting machines and software manufactured
and sold by Dominion and Smartmatic are vulnerable to cyberattacks before, during and
70 of 256
afteran election, and in a manner that could easily alter election outcomes. Election
security expert and University of Michigan science and engineering professor, J. Alex
Halderman, and others have given sworn testimony of this fact.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmivIHUAy8Q) Now-alleged Vice President
Kamala Harris, along with other Democratic senators (ie. Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth
Warren, Marc Warner, Zoe Lofgren, Ron Wyden and others) voiced similar concerns
during a senate hearing prior to the Nov. 2020 General Election
(https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/mike-lindell-presents-absolutely-9-0 at
the 22.55 min. mark)
245. Direct and circumstantial evidence demonstrates that, during the 2020 General
Election, electronic voting machines like those manufactured and sold by Dominion
Voting Systems were manipulated and hacked in a manner that caused votes for one
candidate to be tallied for the opposing candidate.
246. Voting machine companies – like Dominion and ES&S, are state actors by virtue
of their roles running elections in the U.S. - an essential state function.
247. Dominion Voting Systems is foreign-owned and in such cannot be a legitimate
and/or legal entity involved in Florida elections. The Florida Oath, per Fla. Stat. 876.05,
states that each employee of the State of Florida is a citizen of the United States.
248. ES&S is a subsidiary of a Staple Street Investments, which is a subsidiary of a
Bank owned by the Chinese government, which means that ES&S was not qualified to
have a contract with the State of Florida nor was it, as a foreign entity allowed to
participate in U.S. elections.
71 of 256
249. China has a current war doctrine in which China asserts to be at war against the
United States.
250. China is an enemy of the United States.
251. The 2020 Election cycle, in Florida, was an illegal operation. In such, it must be
de-certified and held anew manually and without the interference of technology.
252. Fla. Stat. 876.05 is an oath taken by all public servants – those who work directly
for the state and all employees of any, contractor or subcontractor working with or on
behalf of any state or government agency at any level of government, including but not
limited to local, city, county and state employees, contractors and subcontractors that
each employee is a citizen of the United States. In fact, many of the companies,
contractors and subcontractors involved in the 2020 General Election were not American
citizens or U.S. companies and in such, had no legal right to participate or be involved in
Florida elections at any level. Since they were and since many are known enemies of the
State (ie. China, Venezuela, Canada, etc.) looking to overthrow the United States
government, the Florida General Election results cannot be trusted. (See Judicial Notice –
Florida Statute 876.05)
TECH COMPANIES AND SOCIAL MEDIA USED AS A TOOL TO SUPRESS THE
RIGHT TO SPEECH OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS IN VIOLATION OF THE
FLORIDA CONSTITUTION AND U.S. CODE 203 WHICH DEMANDS SOCIAL MEDIA
ACTS AS A PLATFORM NOT A PUBLISHER AND IN GOOD FAITH
253. The First Amendment guarantees the right of citizens, such as Mike Lindell,
President Trump and Plaintiff Christine Scott, to express political dissent and espouse
beliefs without fear of intimidation, suppression, or punishment from state actors like
72 of 256
voting machine companies that provide election equipment and run elections for
government agencies.
254. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Google suppressed, blocked
and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement Google took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, Google has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good
faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. Google has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
255. Each founder, board member and executive at Google is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Google employees against the
People of the United States.
256. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts Google has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Google is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
73 of 256
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. Google has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government of
Florida and the United States. Google has attempted to operate in a fraudulent manner to
rig the Florida election against the voters. Google’s assets must be seized by the State of
Florida. Google must be dissolved. Google, its subsidiaries and any business Google has
a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida immediate, per Florida laws
that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who would wish to overthrow and
destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well as the liberties, freedom and
way of life of our People.
257. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, YouTube suppressed, blocked
and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement YouTube took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, YouTube has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in
good faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. YouTube has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
258. Each founder, board member and executive at YouTube is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by YouTube employees against the
People of the United States.
74 of 256
259. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts YouTube has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which YouTube is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. YouTube has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government
of Florida and the United States. YouTube has attempted to operate in a fraudulent
manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. YouTube’s assets must be seized by
the State of Florida. YouTube must be dissolved. YouTube, its subsidiaries and any
business YouTube has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
260. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Alphabet by way of its
subsidiary suppressed, blocked and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-
monetized websites, users and accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional,
Republican and Pro-Trump views, as well as other views that promoted independence of
thought, body, mind, spirit, religious belief and support of small businesses, which was
an act of bad faith against the agreement Alphabet took with the United States to act as a
platform, not a publisher. In such, Alphabet has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203
75 of 256
which states it will act in good faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of
America than to uphold and fervently live by the Constitution. Alphabet has refused to do
so and in such must be dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against
Floridians and Plaintiff for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the
State of Florida.
261. Each founder, board member and executive at Alphabet is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Alphabet employees against the
People of the United States.
262. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts Alphabet has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Alphabet is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. Alphabet has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government
of Florida and the United States. Alphabet has attempted to operate in a fraudulent
manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. Alphabet’s assets must be seized by
the State of Florida. Alphabet must be dissolved. Alphabet, its subsidiaries and any
business Alphabet has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
76 of 256
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
263. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Twitter suppressed, blocked
and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement Twitter took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, Twitter has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good
faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. Twitter has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
264. Each founder, board member and executive at Twitter is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Twitter employees against the
People of the United States.
265. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts Twitter has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Twitter is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
77 of 256
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. Twitter has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government of
Florida and the United States. Twitter has attempted to operate in a fraudulent manner to
rig the Florida election against the voters. Twitter’s assets must be seized by the State of
Florida. Twitter must be dissolved. Twitter, its subsidiaries and any business Twitter has
a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida immediate, per Florida laws
that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who would wish to overthrow and
destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well as the liberties, freedom and
way of life of our People.
266. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Amazon suppressed, blocked
and financial excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and accounts
that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump views, as well
as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit, religious belief
and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the agreement
Amazon took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In such,
Amazon has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good
faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. Amazon has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
267. Each founder, board member and executive at Amazon is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Amazon employees against the
People of the United States.
78 of 256
268. By operating a business, in Amazon, that has one or more existing government
contracts Amazon has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Amazon is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. Amazon has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government
of Florida and the United States. Amazon has attempted to operate in a fraudulent manner
to rig the Florida election against the voters. Amazon’s assets must be seized by the State
of Florida. Amazon must be dissolved. Amazon, its subsidiaries and any business
Amazon has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida immediate, per
Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who would wish to
overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well as the
liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
269. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Amazon Web Services
(‘AWS’) suppressed, blocked and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-
monetized websites, users and accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional,
Republican and Pro-Trump views, as well as other views that promoted independence of
thought, body, mind, spirit, religious belief and support of small businesses, which was
an act of bad faith against the agreement AWS took with the United States to act as a
platform, not a publisher. In such, AWS has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203
79 of 256
which states it will act in good faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of
America than to uphold and fervently live by the Constitution. AWS has refused to do so
and in such must be dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against
Floridians and Plaintiff for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the
State of Florida.
270. Each founder, board member and executive at AWS is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by AWS employees against the
People of the United States.
271. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts AWS has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which AWS is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. AWS has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government of
Florida and the United States. AWS has attempted to operate in a fraudulent manner to
rig the Florida election against the voters. AWS’s assets must be seized by the State of
Florida. AWS must be dissolved. AWS, its subsidiaries and any business AWS has a
contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida immediate, per Florida laws
that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who would wish to overthrow and
80 of 256
destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well as the liberties, freedom and
way of life of our People.
272. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Facebook suppressed, blocked
and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement Facebook took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, Facebook has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in
good faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. Facebook has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
273. Each founder, board member and executive at Facebook is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Facebook employees against the
People of the United States.
274. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts Facebook has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of Fla. Stat.
876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Facebook is in violation of for multiple reasons
listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at the
suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the entity
have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the rights
of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not to act
81 of 256
with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights, property
or liberties. Facebook has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the government
of Florida and the United States. Facebook has attempted to operate in a fraudulent
manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. Facebook’s assets must be seized by
the State of Florida. Facebook must be dissolved. Facebook, its subsidiaries and any
business Facebook has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
275. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, WIX suppressed, blocked and
financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and accounts
that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump views, as well
as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit, religious belief
and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the agreement
WIX took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In such, WIX has
violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good faith. There is no
‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and fervently live by the
Constitution. WIX has refused to do so and in such must be dissolved and pay restitution
for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff for its unlawful interference in
the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
276. Each founder, board member and executive at WIX is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by WIX employees against the
People of the United States.
82 of 256
277. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contracts, either directly or indirectly, WIX has agreed to abide by and operated within
the guidelines of Fla. Stat. 876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which WIX is in violation
of for multiple reasons listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice
which was filed at the suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person
working for the entity have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions,
not to violate the rights of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the
United States, not to act with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a
citizen of their rights, property or liberties. WIX has violated all of the above in order to
overthrow the government of Florida and the United States. WIX has attempted to
operate in a fraudulent manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. WIX’s assets
must be seized by the State of Florida. WIX must be dissolved. WIX, its subsidiaries and
any business WIX has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
278. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, PayPal suppressed, blocked
and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement PayPal took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, PayPal has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good
83 of 256
faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. PayPal has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
279. Each founder, board member and executive at PayPal is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by PayPal employees against the
People of the United States.
280. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more, direct or indirect,
government contracts PayPal has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of
Fla. Stat. 876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which PayPal is in violation of for multiple
reasons listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at
the suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the
entity have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the
rights of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not
to act with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights,
property or liberties. PayPal has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the
government of Florida and the United States. PayPal has attempted to operate in a
fraudulent manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. PayPal’s assets must be
seized by the State of Florida. PayPal must be dissolved. PayPal, its subsidiaries and any
business PayPal has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
84 of 256
281. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, GoFundMe suppressed,
blocked and financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and
accounts that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump
views, as well as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit,
religious belief and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the
agreement GoFundMe took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In
such, GoFundMe has violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in
good faith. There is no ‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and
fervently live by the Constitution. GoFundMe has refused to do so and in such must be
dissolved and pay restitution for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff
for its unlawful interference in the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
282. Each founder, board member and executive at GoFundMe is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by GoFundMe employees against the
People of the United States.
283. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more existing government
contract, either directly or indirectly, GoFundMe has agreed to abide by and operated
within the guidelines of Fla. Stat. 876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which GoFundMe is
in violation of for multiple reasons listed above, in attached documents, and in the
Judicial Notice which was filed at the suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state
that each person working for the entity have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida
constitutions, not to violate the rights of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of
Florida and the United States, not to act with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to
deprive a citizen of their rights, property or liberties. GoFundMe has violated all of the
85 of 256
above in order to overthrow the government of Florida and the United States. GoFundMe
has attempted to operate in a fraudulent manner to rig the Florida election against the
voters. GoFundMe’s assets must be seized by the State of Florida. GoFundMe must be
dissolved. GoFundMe, its subsidiaries and any business GoFundMe has a contract with
must cease to operate in the State of Florida immediate, per Florida laws that protect its
citizens against enemy forces and those who would wish to overthrow and destroy the
rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well as the liberties, freedom and way of life
of our People.
284. Leading up to and during the 2020 Election cycle, Apple suppressed, blocked and
financially excommunicated, strangled and de-monetized websites, users and accounts
that supported ‘Conservative’, Constitutional, Republican and Pro-Trump views, as well
as other views that promoted independence of thought, body, mind, spirit, religious belief
and support of small businesses, which was an act of bad faith against the agreement
Apple took with the United States to act as a platform, not a publisher. In such, Apple has
violated its protection via U.S. Code 203 which states it will act in good faith. There is no
‘greater good’ in the United States of America than to uphold and fervently live by the
Constitution. Apple has refused to do so and in such must be dissolved and pay restitution
for the harm it has caused against Floridians and Plaintiff for its unlawful interference in
the 2020 Election cycle in the State of Florida.
285. Each founder, board member and executive at Apple is responsible for and
personally liable for the direction and actions taken by Apple employees against the
People of the United States.
86 of 256
286. By operating a business, in Florida, that has one or more, direct or indirect,
government contracts Apple has agreed to abide by and operated within the guidelines of
Fla. Stat. 876.05, 768.28 and 112.313, all of which Apple is in violation of for multiple
reasons listed above, in attached documents, and in the Judicial Notice which was filed at
the suggestion Judge Smith. The Statutes, in part state that each person working for the
entity have taken an oath to support the U.S. and Florida constitutions, not to violate the
rights of Floridians, that employees are both Citizens of Florida and the United States, not
to act with malicious purpose or in bad faith and not to deprive a citizen of their rights,
property or liberties. Apple has violated all of the above in order to overthrow the
government of Florida and the United States. Apple has attempted to operate in a
fraudulent manner to rig the Florida election against the voters. Apple’s assets must be
seized by the State of Florida. Apple must be dissolved. Apple, its subsidiaries and any
business Apple has a contract with must cease to operate in the State of Florida
immediate, per Florida laws that protect its citizens against enemy forces and those who
would wish to overthrow and destroy the rule of law of Florida, the United States, as well
as the liberties, freedom and way of life of our People.
287. Following the 2020 General Election, Mike Lindell gathered and publicly shared
information from various sources demonstrating that voting machines were, in fact, the
target of cyberattacks during the 2020 General Election. Such evidence includes Dr.
Douglas Frank’s analysis showing conclusively that an algorithm was employed to
manipulate votes in the 2020 General Election of hacking of electronic voting machines
by China and other nation state actors – including twenty such hacks, primarily by enemy
87 of 256
agents in China, that along changed the outcome in the presidential and down ballot
races.
288. Mr. Lindell’s data sources showed that several counties, in Florida, had been
hacked and were under surveillance during the 2020 General Election cycle. On the
evening of Nov. 3, 2020, as the statewide accumulated data left the Secretary of State’s
office electronically, to be transmitted to D.C. to be included in the final total nation vote,
the data packet was intercepted and redirected to Shanghai, China where the information
was switched out and replaced with data arrived at by way of the previous surveillance
which had taken place at a county level and which allowed the enemy Chinese hackers to
recalculate and tabulate the vote to suit their preference in install candidates of their
choosing in what essentially amounts to a non-kinetic act of war. After the data had been
manipulated to the detriment of the United States People and Floridians, it was then sent
out and redirected to D.C. to be recorded as if it were accurately portraying the will of
Florida voters, which it did not. In such, there is reasonable doubt as to whether the
certified election expressed the will of the voters. (‘Kinney v. Putnam’)
289. Between the locally altered down ballot tallies - proven in the mere fact that no
votes were registered at a state level based on precinct breakdown of the four necessary
columns, nor the total Republican, Democrat and other Party vote count - the extensive
use of dashes instead of an actual ballot count, in Palm Beach and other counties, and the
captured data packets intercepted by the Chinese Communist Party there is reasonable
doubt as to whether the certified election expressed the will of the voters. (‘Kinney v.
Putnam’)
88 of 256
290. In response to Mike Lindell’s public statements about the evidence he had
gathered regarding voting machine and software vulnerabilities, Dominion Voting
Systems and its lawyers at Clarke, LLP (“Clare Locke”) threatened Mike Lindell with
financial ruin if he did not cease his public expression of his political speech regarding
the debacle that was the use of electronic voting machines in the 2020 General Election.
Dominion is a foreign company, located in Canada and heavily occupied, influenced and
occupied by the Chinese Communist Party, which essentially meant that the CCP was
telling an American Patriot to shut up about their attempt to take over the United States of
American. China shall not be allowed to abuse the American People.
291. Every entity and person who used the U.S. and Florida 2020 Election cycle as a
tool to overthrow the U.S. and Florida government abused each and every citizen and
voter, in Florida - each has been harmed and deserved full retribution. Had the laws of
Florida been followed, enemies of the state would not have had access to Florida’s 2020
election cycle. The corruption took place by each of the added parties, whether they be
complicit accomplices within the tech monopolies or corrupt officials and employees
working in tandem with fake charities fraudulently claiming to be non-partisan
501(c)(3)s. Each has worked together in a conspiratorial manner in an attempt to
overthrow the U.S. and Florida governments. The conspiratorial racketeering that
culminated in the alteration of valid votes by intentionally vulnerable voting machines to
fraudulently install compliant traitors who would willfully and intentionally violate the
Constitutional rights of U.S. and Florida citizens amounts to treason. Plaintiff has been
harmed by the wrongdoings of the defendants both as an unsuccessful candidate and as
an elector in Florida, as has every single Floridian who has been subjected to the
89 of 256
unconstitutional demands - whether it be unconstitutional mask mandates, harassment
from unconstitutional demands to wear masks to enter businesses, lies and propaganda
about dangerous vaccines being safe - from fake politicians who were installed rather
than duly elected. There is reasonable doubt the will of the voters was expressed in the
2020 Election cycle; it must be set aside and held anew.
292. After American Patriot and concerned U.S. citizen, Mike Lindell refused to be
intimidated into silence, complicity and surrender of his First Amendment right to
political free speech, Dominion Voting Systems - a foreign-owned enemy-of-the-State
CCP-related company that directly and intentionally interfered with U.S. elections -
further took aim at Mr. Lindell by taking the financially and emotionally abusive, Bill
Gates backed strategy of suing him for over $1B in a federal court, in Washington D.C.
where neither Mr. Lindell nor Dominion Voting Systems reside and which is a location
outside the jurisdiction where Lindell made the vast majority of the statements
highlighting Dominion’s wrongdoings and acts of war against the citizens of the United
States.
2020 ELECTION CYCLE MUST BE DECERTIFIED DUE TO FRAUD, MISCONDUCT
AND PUBLIC CORRUPTION
293. On Nov. 17, 2020 Secretary of State Laurel Lee (‘SOS Lee’) presided over the
Election Canvassing Committee (ECC) meeting of the 2020 General Election, a meeting
she had no legal authority to preside over. SOS Lee called the meeting to order, ran the
meeting and closed the meeting. There are only three members of the ECC – the
Governor and two cabinet members. SOS Lee is not a cabinet member nor is she a
member fo the ECC. The two appointed cabinet members to the ECC are General
Attorney Ashley Moody and CFO Jimmy Patronis. None of the three members presided
90 of 256
over the certification of the 2020 General Election and no one else had the authority to do
so. In such, the ECC’s certification of the 2020 General Election carried no weight of
validity and, in such, is null and void by default. Fraud vitiates everything.
(https://thefloridachannel.org/videos/11-17-20-elections-canvassing-commission/)
294. On Aug. 27, 2020 Secretary of State Laurel Lee presided over the Election
Canvassing Committee meeting of the 2020 Primary Election, a meeting she had no legal
authority to preside over. SOS Lee called the meeting to order, ran the meeting, and
closed the meeting. There are only three members of the ECC – the Governor and two
cabinet members. SOS Lee is not a cabinet member nor is she a member of the ECC. The
two appointed cabinet members to the ECC are General Attorney Ashley Moody and
CFO Jimmy Patronis. None of the three members presided over the certification of the
2020 Primary Election and no one else had the authority to do so. In such, the ECC’s
certification of the 2020 Primary Election carried no weight or validity and, in such, is
null and void by default. Fraud vitiates everything.
(https://thefloridachannel.org/videos/8-27-20-elections-canvassing-commission/)
295. The Dept. of State’s ‘Media Advisor’ states in pertinent part, ‘Participants:
Members of the State Elections Canvassing Commission will include The Honorable Ron
DeSantis, Governor; The Honorable Ashley Moody, Attorney General; and The
Honorable Jimmy Patronis, Chief Financial Officer.’ The advisory goes on to state that
‘Secretary Lee will attend in-person.’ The advisory does not claim or state that SOS Lee
will participate but rather only that she will ‘attend’. SOS Lee had a right to attend the
meeting. She did not have the right to participate. Her participation in the meeting
invalidates the meeting and all such actions that took place in the meeting, including but
91 of 256
not limited to the certification of the 2020 Primary Election Certification. The same is
true regarding the 2020 General Election due to the SOS’s direct and substantive
interference and essential illegal takeover of the meeting. Fraud vitiates everything.
(https://dos.myflorida.com/communications/press-releases/2020/media-advisory-
certification-of-2020-presidential-preference-primary-election-results/) (Exhibit 11 –
Screenshot of DOS ‘Media Advisor’ announcement)
296. The only legal ‘Participants’ given authority to conduct the ECC meetings are
members of the ECC, certainly not the person whose department they oversee to ensure
accuracy in the elections.
297. No Posted Primary Election Certification of Palm Beach County Supervisor of
Elections Race Because the PBC SOE Wendy Sartory Link signed the Certification and
was a Candidate in the Race which Made her ineligible to sign the Certification and made
the Primary PBC Certification fraudulent and void. Compare the PBC Primary
Certification against the PBC General Election Certification Webpages – the Primary
Certification is not posted because it does is void, hence the PBC Primary Election was
never legally certified. This is not an acknowledgement that the PBC General Election
Canvassing Board Certification was valid. Instead, it is merely acknowledgement that
even by PBC SOE’s low standards, the PBC Primary Election was not legally certified.
NO OFFICIAL RESULTS POSTED FOR THE 2020 PRIMARY ELECTION ON
PALM BEACH COUNTY WEBSITE...was removed. As a point of reference, previously
on the 2020 Primary Election page the ‘Office Results’ had included the ‘unofficial early
voting totals by day’ and the ‘voting system post-election audit report’ both of which
have since been removed from the site leading one to presume the results are not and
92 of 256
never were valid records and that since the PBCSOE has not reported this fact she is
attempting to hide and conceal it to misrepresent the facts to the public. This also means
that the ‘(Website last updated at: 9/17/2020...’) is also false and meant to mislead the
public. (Exhibit 12 – screenshots of the 2020 Primary and General PBC SOE website,
noting that no official certification or results are listed for the 2020 Primary Election.)
298. A search of the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Website for 2020
Primary Election Canvassing Committee Certification pulls up no direct or related
results.
299. On April 30, 2020, Broward County Supervisor of Elections office elections
employee John Way wrote a memo to Division of Elections Director Maria Matthew
stating that the BC SOE had ‘determined that certain petitions were Rejected that should
have been Accepted...’ While that is true, Way goes on to state false claims about the
actual number of valid petitions that were rejected but should have been accepted. Scott
had spoken Maria Matthews on the phone who informed Scott that Matthews was going
to take Way’s numbers at face value and would not look into or investigate the matter
even though Scott had proof of the errors and had submitted them to Matthews. Scott
believes Matthews, Way and other officials simply didn’t want Scott on the ballot
because Scott was indigent and they personally felt that Scott didn’t have the right to
equal access do to her impoverished financial status, which is a huge violation of Scott’s
Constitutional rights to ballot access as well as her civil rights. After telephone calls and
attempts to get Matthews to do their ministerial duty and review the petitions for
accuracy to ensure every qualified candidate was properly placed on the ballot, on May
27, 2020,Scott wrote a handwritten letter (because Scott had encountered substantial
93 of 256
hacking and didn’t want the document altered) to Kristi Willis, per suggestion of a DOE
employee, with the most up-to-date numbers of valid petitions that had been improperly
rejected by the Broward County Supervisor of Elections and his staff. Scott had called
spoken with Ashley Davis, counsel for the DOE, who said Scott would have to pay to
gain ballot access and that they would not look at the petitions. The administrative
assistant for the counsel, Candice Edwards would repeatedly hang up on Scott and refuse
to allow Scott to leave a voicemail for Ashley Davis regarding Scott’s right to ballot
access. The employees, as well as SOS Lee and Governor DeSantis (who had been cc:ed
regarding the DOE and SOE’s rejection of Scott’s petitions to keep her off the ballot)
acted in unison against Scott’s constitutional rights to ballot access. On June 18, 2020,
Matthews wrote Scott stating that Matthews had received Scott’s files (evidence of over
700 valid petitions that had been erroneously rejected by Broward County Supervisor of
Elections and Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections combined). Matthews (Exhibit
13 – April 30, 2020, May 27, 2020 and June 18, 2020 correspondences from John Way,
Christine Scott and Maria Matthews, respectively, regarding over 700 valid petitions that
had been erroneously rejected and which were fraudulently keeping Scott off the ballot.)
300. Scott was fraudulently kept off the 2020 Primary Election ballots in a
conspiratorial act misconduct and public corruption by snobby elected officials and
bureaucrats who do not believe the voters have the right to determine who does and does
not again ballot access. Fraud vitiates everything. The flagrant fraud of the public
servants who broke their oath, pursuant Fla. Stat. 876.05 vitiates the validity of the 2020
Primary election in Broward County and Palm Beach County. When a certification is
based on fraud it is void because no illegal contract is valid.
94 of 256
301. The Broward County 2020 Primary Election is decertified based on fraud by the
2020 Broward County Supervisor of Elections and his staff, specifically in regards to
willfully and intentionally keeping Scott of the ballot while knowing that she had a legal
right to ballot access, as well as online tabulation fraud that happened on the ES&S
machines which were never federally certified and which have built in internet/modem
access and multiple violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a).
302. The Palm Beach County 2020 Primary Election is decertified based on fraud by
the 2020 Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections and her staff, specifically in regards
to willfully and intentionally keeping Scott of the ballot while knowing that she had a
legal right to ballot access, as well as online tabulation fraud that happened on the ES&S
machines which were never federally certified and which have built in internet/modem
access and multiple violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a).
303. The Division of Elections, SOS Lee and Governor DeSantis were all kept up to
date and sent the detailed proof that Scott had gained ballot access by petition for the seat
of US House of Representatives, in District 22. Each had a legal obligation to ensure
voters were not disenfranchised. Each knew that Scott had obtained the required
modicum of support and each chose to neglect their official duties but rather turn their
back while allowing the fraud to continue and remove the choice from the voters of
Broward County and Palm Beach County. Each of these public servant defendants has
willfully and purposefully acted in bad faith, with malicious intent to deprive Scott of her
legal and Constitutional right to ballot access which is fraud, misconduct and public
corruption. The act has disenfranchised the voters. These facts mean that the Primary
Election must be decertified because the certification is based on fraud and fraud vitiates
95 of 256
everything. There is no late date or specific and only timeframe within which fraud can
be addressed if it falls within the legal statutory limitations of four years. Even so, since
the certification was always based on fraud, it was always illegal and in such, the
document signed never had legal standing and instead was always void. (See Supreme
Court and Florida Case law in Judicial Notice) This fact means the elections in Broward
County and Palm Beach County must be held anew because there is reasonable doubt the
will of the voters was represented in the 2020 Election results.
304. The representation of the Primary Election results in the 2020 election, in Palm
Beach County and Broward County are false because the representation was based on
fraud, which places in doubt the results of the 2020 General Election because you must
doubt final results based on false initial results.
305. It was the intention of Governor DeSantis, SOS Lee, DOE Matthews, PBCSOE
Link, BCSOE Antonacci and their respective staff named as defendants to deceive Scott,
this court and the voters of PBC and BC, based on the facts listed above, throughout this
pleading, in the related filed documents as well as Scott’s Judicial Notice.
306. The 2020 General Election results are void because void because of SOS Lee’s
participation and lead in the ECC certification hearing which she had no legal right to
participate in or officiate over. In such, her actions void the entire process, which puts in
doubt the validity of the certification or, more accurately out-and-out voids the
certification due to the fraudulent nature by which it was obtained.
307. SOS Lee’s representation as a legal participant in the ECC Primary and General
Election certification processes was deceptive since she had no legal authority to officiate
the meeting. The certifications for both elections is null and void, never having had any
96 of 256
legal standing. In such, the entire 2020 Election cycle, in the State of Florida must be set
aside and held anew.
308. The Florida ES&S machines used in 2020 were not federally certified. In such,
they could not be used in the 2020 election cycle in Florida and Florida had no right to
certify the machines, which are each installed with the ability to access the internet. In
such, the entire election process, in Florida was vulnerable to outside cyber
intrusion/attack and has placed the entire FL election cycle in doubt. Florida’s
certification of machines that were uncertifiable based on their cyber vulnerabilities was
fraud. Florida’s representation that the machines were certified and/or certifiable was an
intentional misrepresentation of the facts. Fraud vitiates everything. Florida’s 2020
Election cycle must be set aside and held anew due to the doubt that the will of the voters
was expressed.
OTHER FACTS RELATING TO METHODS OF ATTACK AGAINST FLORIDA’S 2020
ELECTION CYCLE WHICH INVOLVE FRAUD, MISCONDUCT AND PUBLIC
CORRUPTION
309. After the 2020 Election cycle man Big Tech CEOs vowed not to let Trump win
the 2020 election.
310. Mark Zuckerberg funneled $350M directly into CTCL and at least another
$69.5M into another charity that funneled money into CTCL.
311. In 2019, CTCL had received approximately $1.4M total from all sources.
312. 501(c)(3)s are not allowed to be partisan.
313. CTCL had a clear intention of increasing vote by mail ballots.
314. CTCL focused heavily on Democrat run counties.
315. CTCL gave $6.8M to Trump’s home county of Palm Beach.
97 of 256
316. Only three states took more funding from the government than CTCL gave to
Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link. (Judicial Notice –
Facts)
317. China wanted Joe Biden to win the 2020 Election.
318. Berney Sanders, in advance, explained exactly how the election fraud was going
to occur. It occurred just as Sanders had predicted.
319. George Soros is known for overthrowing governments.
320. The U.S. is the ultimate target for anyone looking to overthrow a government,
because the U.S. would be the hardest country to overthrow due to its economic and
military strength.
321. Joe Biden did not adequately campaign for the office of the president because he
knew the election was rigged and admitted to it. This hurt Florida voters because it stole
their voice, their right to have their vote count, the right to a fair election.
322. Broward County attorneys attempted to have ballot images deleted General
Election was certified.
323. Federal mandate demands election records be kept for 22 months after an
election.
324. Broward County attorneys were attempting to hide election fraud.
325. There is no valid and/or justifiable reason for any county to destroy ballot images,
except to hide election fraud.
326. Due to the substantial non-compliance with election statutes a new election
should be held. See Burke v. Beasley, 75 So. 2d 7 (1954)
98 of 256
327. The illegitimate infusion of private funding and third-party promotion of training,
equipment, security, staffing and reporting programs by a network of private nonprofits at
the local level bypassed state administrative processes, violated legislative prerogatives
codified in state Help America Vote Plans (HAVA), and resulted in questions about the
integrity of the U.S. electoral system. (Source: Amistad Project)
328. The right to vote assured to every citizen by the U.S. Constitution was stolen from
Floridians, during the 2020 Election cycle, in an attempt to overthrow our government for
personal and corporate profit, as well as to benefit enemy nations, such as China - a
country with a war doctrine stating that it is at war with the U.S.
329. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link admits during
an interview with Laura Loomer that Link needed CTCL’s 'permission’ before she could
take an action relating to funds which CTCL had funneled into the Palm Beach County
2020 election cycle. Supervisor Link’s need of CTCL’s permission means she turned
control of the election over to a third party, in this case CTCL... or since Link claims she
took the money from Mark Zuckerberg; Link is actually admitting to believing she turned
the election over to Mark Zuckerberg.
(https://secure.lauraloomerforcongress.com/sartory?amount=20)
330. Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of Facebook.
331. Facebook has hidden, blocked and deleted pro-Trump posts while promoting pro-
Biden posts during the election cycle as a way to influence votes.
332. Mark Zuckerberg’s motive in directly and indirectly funneling over $419.5M into
the election cycle was to ensure Trump would not be re-elected.
99 of 256
333. Mark Zuckerberg used his money, influence, company and power to rig the 2020
election to ensure a candidate he did not like would not get into office.
334. Google blacklisted Conservative, Right-leaning, Republican, Patriot sites as a tool
of suppression to influence the vote in favor of Biden. (Exhibit Partial Google Blacklist)
335. Ballots are not secure.
336. 2020 Supervisor of Elections for Broward County Peter Antonacci stated during a
Feb, 2, 2020 Florida House of Representatives Public Integrity and Elections Committee
hearing that ballots can be printed at any local print shop and that there is no way of
know if or securing again the print shop or anyone with access to a ballot from printing
off additional ballots. In such, the chance of fraud by way of nefarious printing of extra,
fraudulent and illegal ballots is not only existent but quite high particularly during a year
when the U.S. elections have clearly come under such extreme attack, which creates
reasonable doubt that the will of the voters was expressed in the 2020 Election cycle. See
‘Kinney v. Putnam’.
337. In nearly all of the 2020 General Election races in Palm Beach County the law
was violated by using dashes instead of numbers in columns that obviously would have
had more than 29 votes per column, pursuant Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a). In and of itself this
is enough misconduct to warrant the need to set aside the 2020 Election and hold it anew.
An election should be set aside if there has been substantial non-compliance with a
statutory election procedure. The 10s of 1000s of violations of 98.0981(2)(a) alone
constitute such appallingly high number of violations that this court has no choice but to
de-certify the 2020 election, set it aside and hold it anew.
100 of 256
338. Scott has repeatedly requested public records from the Division of Elections,
which has refused to hand over the documents leading on to assume the Division of
Elections, much less respond to Scott’s requests, under the guidance and supervision of
the Secretary of State whose duties are overseen by the Governor of the State is hiding
election fraud.
339. The Secretary of State Laurel Lee, Director of Election for the Division of
Elections Maria Matthews the Supervisor of Elections in Broward County and the
Supervisor of Elections in Palm Beach County, deputies and government employees who
acted on their behalf have violated the Florida Constitution and Florida’s Sunshine Act
by refusing to allow Scott access to the public records which she has requested. (See
Judicial Notice: Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes)
340. Governor DeSantis would personally benefit from election fraud if he can control
it during a second run for Governor or a 2024 run for President.
341. Governor DeSantis appointed Secretary of State Lee could personally benefit
from her relationship with Governor DeSantis if she participated in or turned a blind-eye
to election fraud that benefited the Governor.
342. Governor DeSantis appointed Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Sartory
Link could personally benefit by participating in or turning a blind-eye to election fraud.
343. Then-Governor DeSantis-appointed Broward County Supervisor of Elections and
now-Chief Judge of Administrative Hearings Peter Antonacci could have (and did
personally gain) after election fraud that took place under his watch in Broward County,
whether it be from incompetence, turning a blind-eye or participating in the 2020
Election Cycle fraud.
101 of 256
344. When Plaintiff/Candidate Scott told Peter Antonacci of the election fraud she had
personally experienced in Broward County seeking help in resolving the fraud issues, Mr.
Antonacci explained that he was just a ‘ministerial monkey’. Scott replied that the
matters at hand were ministerial, his duty and within his authority to address. Antonacci
chose not to address them, which made him more of a stooge for corruption than a
‘ministerial monkey’ in following the law.
345. Many of Plaintiff Scott’s Broward County petitions were erroneously rejected for
‘Bad Signatures’ when after inspection the signatures were valid; as ‘Unknown’ when in
fact they were not unknown but entered incorrectly into the database giving a false
rejection, ‘Inactive’ which is not a reason to reject a petition because such a voter is a
legally registered voter whose vote counts; ‘Wrong District’ (Margate, Coral Springs,
Coconut Creek and Margate) when the petitions were solidly within the district; and at
least 189 petitions that Scott and a helper found during inspection that had been shoved to
the bottom of the rejected pile which were never entered into the system at all.
346. By issuing a narrower injunction relating to the total number of petitions needed
for ballot access due to the pandemic, the court would not have made Scott a candidate
by judicial decree, but rather would have protected her right to gain ballot access by
petition while taking into effect the devasting impact coronavirus had on petitioning. A
narrower injunction would have brought balance and fairness into the equation of
petitioning during a pandemic. The fact that the court refused to properly address the
matter harmed Scott by depriving her of her constitutional right to ballot access.
347. There are 8 Florida Counties with Registration rates surpassing 100% more
registered voters than eligible voting age citizens, in 2020. 1) St. Johns County 112%; 2)
102 of 256
Nassau County 109%; 3) Walton County 108%; 4) Santa Rosa County 108%; 5) Flagler
County 104%; 6) Clay County 103%; 7) Indian River County 101%; and 8) Osceola
County 100%. It is not possible for a county to legally have more registered voters than
there are eligible voters.
348. Relating to public corruption, fraud and misconduct: It is impossible to tell
whether all Vote by Mail ballots, in Palm Beach County were counted due to the PBC
SOE’s use of unsecured vans combined with the SOE’s admission of subservience to
CTCL (citing PBC SOE Wendy Sartory Link stating that she has to get ’permission’ from
CTCL, which indicates she has surrendered her autonomous control of elections over to
an outside entity, CTCL... or perhaps more specifically Mark Zuckerberg since Link
confirmed she took the $6.8M from Zuckerberg.
https://secure.lauraloomerforcongress.com/sartory?amount=20)
349. Due to the unsecured nature of Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections
Wendy Sartory Link’s Drive By Vote By Mail Drop Off vans the chain of custody has
been lost.
350. UBS Securites infused $400M into Staple Street Capital (the parent company of
Dominion Voting Systems) three weeks before the 2020 presidential election.
351. Leonard SpA was in business with UBS Securities and signed an Italian affidavit.
Leonard SpA’s Head of IT, Arturo D’Elia admitted to taking part in a cyber hack of the
2020 election.
352. PBC SOE Wendy Sartory Link admitted that she did not secure the machines or
firewall before the 2020 Election cycle, which means the PBC SOE’s election cycle was
vulnerable to cyber-attacks.
103 of 256
353. Mary Fanning and Mike Lindell have proven that the voting machines were
hacked across the country affecting the elections up and down the ballot, which raises
doubt that the Florida election cycle expressed the will of the voters.
354. On Feb. 9, 2020, Peter Antonacci expressed concern over the fact that a local
printer was used to print ballots and that anyone would print off additional ballots, which
raises doubt as to whether the chain of custody can be trusted
(https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711).
355. It is impossible to tell if the official 2020 General Election results express the will
of the people due to the extreme number of dashes that were used instead of numbers, in
violation of 98.0981(2)(a) which creates doubt that the election expressed the will of the
people. In such, the 2020 election cycle must be set aside and held anew.
356. The ES&S voting machines were not federally certified and, in such, could not be
used in Florida. Misconduct, fraud and/or public corruption moved those machines
through the system allowing them to be used even though they had not been certified and
are knows to have internet access installed in them.
357. PBC SOE has admitted that the internet was connected during the 2020 Primary
election and even complained that the connection was slow.
358. PBC SOE admitted that multiple poll workers walked off with cartridges
containing ballot totals, which means no one knows where those cartridges were or if
they were altered while out of the control of the PBC SOE. This happened during the
2020 Primary Election. The chain of custody was lost. The entire election 2020 election
cycle in Palm Beach County must be set aside and held anew due to misconduct, fraud
and/or public corruption.
104 of 256
359. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook, YouTube and others used CTCL and other
501(c)(3)s in a deceptive and misleading manner by attempting to misrepresent the facts
and pretend that CTCL, and other defendant 501(c)(3)s were non-partisan – which is
fraud – to covertly fund widespread illicit election activities at a county-level focused on
increasing/influencing the democrat vote and using the biological warfare weapon of
COVID-19 to terrorize voters as a strategy to increase the vote by mail ballot turnout,
which is easy to manipulate, destroy, alter and change, and tends to have a higher
democrat turnout. It was a devious action of fraud and an act of war levied against the
People of Florida in an attempt to overturn not only the election but also to overthrow the
United States.
360. Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) ...voter
education on registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one
candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; (c) have the effect of
favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or
intervention.
361. CTCL focused on large democrat cities, in violation of section (c) of restricted
intervention of Section 501(c)(3).
362. CTCL had Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link
focus on Drive By Vote By Mail Drop Off vans which received so much criticism that
their use was discontinued, which raises the question of whether or not one can trust the
chain of custody relating to this debacle. There is reasonable doubt the election expressed
the will of the people due to the outrageously unsecure strategy used to pick up ballots at
random locations throughout Palm Beach County.
105 of 256
363. The CTCL/PBCSOE focus on Vote by Mail ballots and Drive By Ballot vans
favored a group of candidates...Democrats, which is a prohibited participation or
intervention and is therefore restricted.
364. CTCL acted outside its agreement with the IRS in how it operated as a 501(c)(3),
which is deceptive and, in such, fraud... specifically election fraud.
365. In a Palm Beach Post article published on Aug. 19, 2020, PBC SOE Sartory Link
blamed thick walls in some schools for blocking the rapid-fire transmission results from
some polling places...New poll workers had difficulty connecting modems, meaning
results would not transmit. Some long-planned rooms changed at the last minute...forcing
workers into rooms with poor internet connections.
(https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2020/08/19/why-pbc-took-all-night-to-
count-ballots-despite-new-voting-tech/113360996/)
366. PBC SOE Sartory Link refused to answer questions relating to timely ballot
processing of ballots received by the Drive By Ballot Vans sprawled throughout Palm
Beach County. She said she was busy, which does not answer the chain of custody
question relating to ballots and the CTCL funded unsecure vans.
(https://bocanewsnow.com/2020/10/21/listen-to-voicemail-palm-beach-county-elections-
supervisor-calls-our-report-unfair/)
367. CTCL paid for the van workers via the money CTCL gave to PBC SOE Sartory
Link, in her official capacity.
368. When Scott requested specific info to help identify if the van workers qualified as
poll workers PBCSOE Link’s office refused to supply it.
106 of 256
369. Election officials knew, before the 2020 Election cycle, that ES&S machines were
connected to the internet.
(https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2020/10/16/florida-voting-machines-ripe-
russian-hackers-experts-say/3650817001/)
370. U.S. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 4 invests the power over federal elections in state
legislatures.
371. Any matter addressed in previous complaint cannot be re-addressed in subsequent
complaint. Only new matter may be addressed.
372. Unlicensed Lobbying -- SOS Lee and 11 Supervisors of Elections lobbied on
behalf of CTCL and other 501(c)(3) defendants without legal authority, designation as a
lobbyist, proper filings, which is in violation. State officials cannot legally act as
lobbyists.
373. Since poll workers, in PBC, walked off with the cartridges that contain the vote
totals during the 2020 Primary election cycle the chain of custody was lost and whether
the will of the voter was expressed in the election is in doubt.
374. CTCL funds were used against the EAC agreement signed by SOS Lee because
funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid to PBC SOE Wendy Sartory
Link ‘for influencing or attempting to influence an officer (and) employee(s) of (an)
agency (SOE)… in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Stand Form-LLL, “Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities.
375. Separate batches of blank ballots electronically pre-loaded into the voting
machines to represent precinct totals, per candidate, could easily produce a processed
107 of 256
ballot stream so that the actual paper ballots would not be needed until later to create
corroboration for the electronic count.
376. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in such a way that
the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the
software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their
thumbprint or fingerprint on the scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of
the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the
changed vote. Sidney Powell’s AZ case, pg. 4 - Relating to Smartmatic - the base program
used in ES&S and Dominion. Whistleblower Testimony, Voting Machine Testimony
“Venezuela Smartmatic Affidavit 11.16.2020”
377. The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to
reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes... Key components of the
system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially, this allows an unauthorized user the
opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log
election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations – or more specifically, do not
reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people. Sidney Powell’s AZ, Ex 7, Declaration
of Harri Hursti ‘45-48
378. Based upon all the allegations of fraud, statutory violations, and other misconduct
and corruption, as stated herein and in attached filings, it is necessary to enjoin the
certification of the election results and invalidate the election results.
379. Broward County Supervisor of Elections counted Ted Deutsch’s petitions before
Scott’s petitions even though Scott’s petitions had been sitting there for weeks. In
comparison Deutsch’s petitions had been there for one day before counted. This shows
108 of 256
bias for a particular candidate making the Broward County SOE employees
untrustworthy.
380. Scott believes that Ted Deutsch’s ‘non-original signatures’ need to be inspected to
make sure they were not copied from the BC SOE’s database, rather than property
obtained from the voter. In fact, without seen the chain of custody via the email
attachments, etc there is no way of proving how the signatures were obtained.
381. While inspecting rejected petitions, Scott found at least 189 that had been shoved
to the bottom of the rejected pile but never added into the system to see if they were valid
or not. It was fraud. They refused to even attempt to verify them, which shows extreme
bias against Scott by BC SOE, which is a violation of their duties pursuant Fla. Stat.
112.313 and 768.28. This criminal act of election fraud to keep Scott off the ballot hurt
Scott.
382. RCV Method (Rank Choice Voting Algorithm, in Dominion’s User Guide) is a
‘additive algorithm’, combined with blank ballots loaded by the election workers or
system operators, to manipulate votes. This creates doubt that in the Dominion machines
used in 18 Florida counties, that the election expressed the will of the people.
383. On or about Aug. 27, 2021, Scott spoke with Don Rubottom of the Florida House
of Representatives. He explained to Scott that it is not uncommon for 90% of poll
workers to be Democrats in heavily Democrat cities.
384. There are no cities in Florida with anywhere near 90% Democrat ratios.
385. While Scott was petitioning, she spoke with between 26-30K voters. Repeatedly,
Republicans told her that the SOE wouldn’t return their calls, give them necessary
paperwork or receive the paperwork once filled out that would allow them to work as poll
109 of 256
workers, which demonstrates entrenched misconduct and public corruption indicating a
coverup regarding how many Democrat voters there actually are in these so called
heavily Democrat cities and why don’t they want Republicans involved in the election
process? What are they hiding? This misconduct, or worse, creates doubt that in the vote
totals and whether the election expressed the will of the voters. It also shows grave
concern that the bureaucrats are fully aware of and supportive of the wrongful
overbearing numbers of Democrat poll workers.
386. Fraud by Broward County attorneys in Broward County lawsuit unravels all that
was implemented by the fraud and in such allows this court to look at Primary Election
and decertify Primary Election results. Fraud vitiates everything.
387. Voting systems must be HAVA compliant; Dominion and ES&S are not.
388. Dominion Voting Systems is not currently certified pursuant to the EAC Voting
Systems. There is doubt the will of Florida voters in 18 counties that used Dominion
Voting Systems expressed the will of the voter.
389. The security risks (using DVS200 ES&S)… are extreme and destroy the
credibility of the tabulations and output of the reports coming from the voting system.
Sidney Powell’s AZ lawsuit, #72G
390. CTCL, Secretary of State Laurel Lee and the eleven Supervisors of Elections who
accepted funds from CTCL failed to register as lobbyists for Mark Zuckerberg, the
Democratic National Committee, China and the United Nations.
391. Dominion harmed Scott and Floridians by selling Florida counties and/or the
Department of State voting machines that are not in compliance with HAVA and for
being internet accessible, making them vulnerable to hackers.
110 of 256
392. In voting systems that use SCYTL (all voting systems), votes on route, before
reporting, go to SCYTL in foreign countries. Sidney Powell’s AZ lawsuit, #80
393. CTCL grants demanded control of elections (Amistad Project), which means
Facebook, Google, Mark Zuckerberg and others behind CTCL controlled the election,
which raises doubt whether the 2020 Election cycle expressed the will of Florida voters.
394. A signed petition is the equivalent of a vote. Enough sufficient legal petitions
were signed but not counted to change or place in doubt whether the 2020 Primary
Election expressed the will of the voters, or disenfranchised them.
395. PBC SOE Wendy Sartory Link shows gross negligence and acts of fraud by an
election official. She failed to conform to technical requirements of election statutes in
handling absentee ballots. See ‘Bolden v. Potter
396. There is a discrepancy between FL’s certified vote and what cyber experts have
determined the actual tabulated voting machine results to be based on ‘packet captures.
397. Raw Data (https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/data-statistics/elections-
data/precinct-level-election-results/) and Precinct Data
(https://enr.electionsfl.org/PAL/2801/Precincts/37486/0/99/) proving no votes counted at
state level nor programmed/coded in from the Palm Beach County Precinct data. (Exhibit
L-1a)
398. Raw Data Header Table (Exhibit L-1b) is not included in spreadsheet.
399. Data Header Table is mandatory, per Florida statute.
400. The fact that the Data Header Table is not added to Raw Data spreadsheet(s) is a
violation of Florid statute.
111 of 256
401. At the time of Florida’s certification, no data headers (Titles) had been added to
the Election Result Spreadsheets.
402. Data may not be altered after election certification, or else the certification
becomes null and void and must be vacated.
403. Column E, Row 9 At a precinct-level ‘Total Registered Voters’ (see L-1ba,
Column E, Row 9)
404. The Florida 2020 General Election certification is not valid because no votes were
entered into the 2020 raw data election spreadsheet available for public viewing on the
Department of State’s Division of Elections website. (see Exhibit L-1bb)
405. No Calculated Precinct Totals, in Florida’s 2020 General Election Raw Data, for:
(Exhibit L-1bb)
406. ‘Total Registered Republicans’, Row 10 – Column D=0, Column E=0, Column
F=0
407. ‘Total Registered Democrats’, Row 10 – Column D=0, Column E=0, Column
F=0
408. ‘Total Registered All Other Parties’, Row 10 – Column D=0, Column E=0,
Column F=0
409. SQL Server allows unsecured access to voter system data. (Exhibit L-1c)
410. SQL Server allows base-level access to voter system data at an admin level.
(Exhibit L-1c)
411. SQL Server allows unsecured access to voter system data for all Florida
Dominion Voting Machine systems. (Exhibit L-1c)
112 of 256
412. SQL Server allows unsecured access to voter system data for all Florida ES&S
voting software. (Exhibit L-1c)
413. SQL Server allows unsecured access to voter system data. (Exhibit L-1c)
414. SQL Server’s unsecured access allows hackers, bad actors or anyone with access
to bypass any security measures installed within the Dominion voting machines and
software. (Exhibit L-1c)
415. SQL Server’s unsecured access allows hackers, bad actors or anyone with access
to bypass any security measures installed within the ES&S voting machines and software.
(Exhibit L-1c)
416. Dominion products used, in Florida, are compatible with SQL Server. (Exhibit L-
1c)
417. ES&S products used in, in Florida, are compatible with SQL Server. (Exhibit L-
1c)
418. Dominion's intentional and/or unintentional security breach opens the voter data
to manipulation. (Exhibit L-1c)
419. ES&S’ intentional and/or unintentional security breach opens the voter data to
manipulation. (Exhibit L-1c)
420. The lack of security built into Dominion’s system infrastructure installed in
Florida’s Dominion package from start-to-finish and/or anywhere in between allows the
vote totals to be altered/changed/manipulated at all levels – from state-to-precinct, from
President down to School Board Seats. (Exhibit L-1c)
421. The lack of security built into ES&S’ system infrastructure installed in Florida’s
ES&S package from start-to-finish and/or anywhere in between allows the vote totals to
113 of 256
be altered/changed/manipulated at all levels – from state-to-precinct, from President
down to School Board Seats. (Exhibit L-1c)
422. 50 Screenshots of 2020 General Election Results ‘The Big Lie’ and ‘The Truth’
representing 48 States, DC and the total vote based on the voting machine count per
certified voting machine data (identified as ‘The Big Lie’) and packet captured voting
machine data analysis. Source: Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium, Aug. 10-12, 2021 and
the CyberNinjas) (Exhibit L-1d)
423. There is evidence indicating a pre-set algorithm was used from the 2010 Census
which manipulated, altered and fraudulently determined the 2020 General Election
Results in Florida, as well as in every other State in the Union. (Source: Dr. Douglas G.
Frank who holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry from the University of
Cincinnati.) (Exhibit L-2: Dr. Frank’s Diagrams of Algorithmic Manipulations of
Election Data Tied to 2010 US Census. Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfkCNfDSZJo)
424. Identical Biden-to-Trump vote ratios of 0.93359375, in all 67 FL counties, created
a weighted vote distribution of 47.8% for Biden and 51.2% for Trump. "Consistently
identical ratio of Biden-to-Trump votes across time, which is theoretically
impossible...Florida...updates occurred over a week following the election. Notice all the
ratios of Biden-to-Trump votes are 100% identical over several days." (Exhibit L-3:
Source: Source: “Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?”
https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/
between 3:03-3:33 mins.)
114 of 256
425. Dominion acquired ES&S in 2010 (Exhibit L-4: Source: “Unmasked: Has the
Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-
the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/ at 4:01 mins.)
426. Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian-Owned company. (Exhibit L-5: Source:
“Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?”
https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
427. Dominion Voting Systems is owned by Staple Street Capital. (Exhibit L-6:
Source: “Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?”
https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
428. Staple Street Capital is owned by UBS Securities, LLC. (Exhibit L-7: Source:
“Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?”
https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
429. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly and/or
indirectly involving Dominion Voting Machines. (Exhibit L-8: Source: “Unmasked: Has
the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-
has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
430. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly and/or
indirectly involving Staple Street Capital. (Exhibit L-9: Source: “Unmasked: Has the
Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-
the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
431. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly and/or
indirectly involving UBS Securities, LLC. (Exhibit L-10: Source: “Unmasked: Has the
115 of 256
Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-
the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
432. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by Amazon Web Services (AWS)
directly and/or indirectly involving AWS’ acquisition of SCYTL (Exhibit L-11: Source:
“Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been Uncovered?”
https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-uncovered/)
433. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly or
indirectly involving George Soros. (Exhibit L2-1)
434. Many of the organizations funding CTCL are funded by George Soros. (Exhibit
L2-1a)
435. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference involving
China. (Exhibit L2-2: Source: “Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020 Election Been
Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-2020-election-been-
uncovered/ at ~10 mins.) (Exhibit L2-2, see L3-2)
436. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly or
indirectly involving Canada. (Source: “Unmasked: Has the Truth About the 2020
Election Been Uncovered?” https://lindelltv.com/unmasked-has-the-truth-about-the-
2020-election-been-uncovered/) (Exhibit L2-3)
437. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by foreign interference directly or
indirectly involving Bill Gates. (Exhibit L2-4)
438. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Joe Biden. (Exhibit L2-5)
116 of 256
439. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Kamala Harris. (Exhibit L2-6)
440. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Barack Obama. (Exhibit L2-7)
441. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Anthony Fauci. (Exhibit L2-8)
442. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Center for Disease Control (‘CDC’) (Exhibit L2-9)
443. Violated the Constitutional rights of Florida voters. (Exhibit L2-9a)
444. Operated outside its authority against Florida voters.
445. The CDC’s mandates and guidelines were not within its jurisdiction.
446. The CDC knowingly created guidelines that were not based facts, such as the
notion that masks prevent the spread of COVID-19; inaccurately counting flu deaths as
COVID-19 death which influenced how Floridians voted, particularly increasing the
promotion of vote by mail ballots; and created unnecessary and unwarranted fear of
voting in person or gathering for political meetings to discuss candidates and issues
before the election.
447. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Deborah Birx who made false and unrealistic claims about COVID-19 which
created unwarranted fear, in Florida voters, relating to voting in person which had the
effect of promoting voting by mail. (Exhibit L2-10)
448. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). (Exhibit L3-1)
117 of 256
449. CTCL gave over $17M to 11 FL Supervisor of Elections, in their official
capacity. (Exhibit L3-1a)
450. CTCL encouraged vote by mail over voting in person. (Exhibit L3-1b)
451. CTCL is funded by Democrat leaning organizations. (Exhibit L3-1c)
452. Many of the organizations funding CTCL are funded by George Soros or Mark
Zuckerberg. (Exhibit L3-1d)
453. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) donated $350M into CTCL. (Exhibit L3-1e)
454. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) donated $69.5M into a separate charity that
donated it to CTCL. (Exhibit L3-1f)
455. Priscilla Chan is the wife of Mark Zuckerberg. (Exhibit L3-1g)
456. Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of Facebook. (Exhibit L3-1h)
457. Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan founded Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) in
2015. (Exhibit L3-1i)
458. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly and/or
indirectly involving Mark Zuckerberg. (Exhibit L3-2)
459. Organizations funding CTCL are funded by Mark Zuckerberg, including but not
limited to Center for Civic Design. (Exhibit L3-2a)
460. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) donated $350M into CTCL. (Exhibit L3-2b, see
Exhibit L3-1e)
461. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) donated $69.5M into a separate charity that
donated it to CTCL. (Exhibit L3-2c, see Exhibit L3-1f)
462. Priscilla Chan is a Chinese-American citizen. (Exhibit L3-2d)
118 of 256
463. The Chinese Communist Party (‘CCP’) believes it is the duty of all Chinese
citizens living outside of China to act on behalf of the CCP. (Exhibit L3-2e)
464. The CCP using other Chinese nationals to threaten Chinese citizens living outside
of China if those nationals do not act on behalf of the CCP. (Exhibit L3-2f, see Exhibit
L3-2e)
465. The CCP threatens Chinese nationals living outside of China with harm to their
family members, still living in China, if they do not act on behalf of the CCP. (Exhibit
L3-2g, see Exhibit L3-2e)
466. Priscilla Chan is the wife of Mark Zuckerberg. (Exhibit L3-2h, see Exhibit L3-1g)
467. Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of Facebook. (Exhibit L3-2i, see Exhibit L3-1h)
468. Facebook is an DARPA company. (Exhibit L3-2j, see Exhibit L3-2k and Exhibit
L3-2m)
469. DARPA’s LifeLog was the Precursor to Facebook. (Exhibit L3-2k)
470. Mark Zuckerberg uses the Facebook platform to silence Floridians who address
election fraud concerns. (Exhibit L3-2l)
471. Facebook has or has had a DARPA research building on Facebook’s campus
called ‘Building 8’. (Exhibit L3-2m)
472. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving China.
473. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Canada.
474. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Pakistan.
119 of 256
475. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Serbia.
476. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Dominion Voting Systems.
477. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Election Systems and Software (‘ES&S’).
478. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving USB Securities.
479. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Alphabet.
480. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Google.
481. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving YouTube.
482. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving GoFundMe.
483. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving PayPal.
484. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Microsoft.
485. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Blackrock.
120 of 256
486. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Bill Gates.
487. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Peter Thiel.
488. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Twitter.
489. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Saudi Arabia.
490. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving the Central Intelligence Agency.
491. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Anthony Fauci.
492. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving the Center for Disease Control.
493. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Joe Biden.
494. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Hunter Biden.
495. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Apple.
496. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Tim Cook.
121 of 256
497. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Mitch McConnell.
498. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving James Comey.
499. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving John Brennan.
500. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Amazon.
501. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Amazon Web Services.
502. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving WIX.
503. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Staple Street Capital.
504. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by interference directly or indirectly
involving Jeff Bezo.
505. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving ---
506. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving Secretary Laurel Lee.
507. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving Divisions of Elections Director Maria Matthews.
122 of 256
508. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link.
509. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving Broward County Supervisor of Elections Peter Antonacci.
510. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving the Federal Bureau of Investigations.
511. Florida’s 2020 election cycle was affected by direct and/or indirect action(s)
involving Governor Ron DeSantis.
512. Solarwinds was used to hack into voting machines.
513. DHS inserted Albert censors in voting centers throughout the county.
514. DHS’s Albert Censors captured the election data using capture packets.
515. DHS has not made the Capture Packets available to the states for review.
516. During the 2020 election cycle all Florida ES&S and Dominion voting machine
systems used the SQL Server.
517. Palm Beach County Voting Machines are connected to the internet, according to
Palm Beach Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link. (Exhibit L–?)
518. 18 FL counties use Dominion Voting Machines and related Software (Exhibit L–
?)
519. 49 FL counties use ES&S Voting Machines and related Software (Exhibit L-?)
520. Palm Beach County Election Machines, devices and firewalls were not secure
during the 2020 General Election.
521. IDrak cards are used in all ES&S voting machines.
522. the iDrak card allows remote access to the voting machine.
123 of 256
523. The iDrak card allows
524. The iDrak card is used in all Dell machines.
525. ES&S uses Dell machines.
526. Florida’s ES&S machines use the EVS200.
527. The EVS voting machines are not federally certified.
528. The EVS machines have remote access install in all Florida machines.
529. Dominion Code written in Serbia. (oltman pic)
530. Huawei is on US restricted list. (pics)
531. Dominion hardware built in Chinese (pics)
532. Smartmatic and Dominion made by same Chinese supplier. (pic)
533. Smartmatic and Dominion hardware same product with different label. (Oltman
pic)
534. Florida’s ES&S Voting machines, software and equipment were not federally
certified for use in 2020
535. Florida used ES&S Voting machines, software and equipment in violation of
federal guidelines since FL’s ES&S products were not federally certified.
536. Palm Beach County Supervisor of elections stopped or slowed down counting
ballots in the late night/morning hours during the Primary Election (use WSL’s words).
537. WSL admitted the firewall and security still needed to be addressed after the 2020
election cycle. (per WSL)
538. List of 18 FL counties that used Dominion voting machines and equipment during
the 2020 Election cycle.
124 of 256
539. List of 49 FL counties that used ES&S voting machines and equipment during the
2020 Election cycle.
540. Wendy Sartory Link admits ES&S voting machines were connected to the
internet during the 2020 election cycle. She complained about thick walls slowing down
the internet speed.
541. John Way admitted that he had miscounted total number of valid petitions
submitted by Christine Scott after the Primary certification took place.
542. Maria Matthews changed the total number of valid petitions submitted by
Christine Scott after the certification of the Primary election.
543. The official acknowledgement and changes made to total valid count of Christine
Scott’s petitions invalidates the invalid certification of the Primary Election.
544. If data is missing or deleted from the voter rolls or election vote totals and
breakdown of ‘Election Day’, ‘Early Voting’ and ‘Vote By Mail’, then evidence was
tampered with, which places in doubt the result of the election.
545. Florida’s Secretary of State Laurel Lee was not authorized to preside over
Florida’s General Election certification, which makes the unauthorized certification null
and void.
546. Florida Election Analysis by Seth Keshel (Exhibit L5-1)
547. Election System “Air Gap” Myths (Exhibit L5-2)
548. Election Fraud Evidence Primer (Exhibit L5-3)
549. Modem Chips Embedded in Voting System Computer Motherboards (Exhibit L5-
4)
550. Election Process Audit Map: Good Stuff and Bad Stuff (Exhibit L5-5)
125 of 256
551. Election Fraud Cover-Up Contest (Exhibit L5-6)
552. Modem Chips Embedded in Voting System Computer Motherboards (Exhibit L5-
7)
553. Antrim County: The Thread That Unravels 2020 Election Theft (Exhibit L5-8)
554. Dominion CEO Testifies Before MI Senate Under Oath (Exhibit L5-9)
555. Harri Hursti Testimony, Antrim County, GA (Exhibit L5-10)
556. Dominion Servers Had Network Card in Them (Exhibit L5-11)
557. Colorado Secretary of State Password Access (Exhibit L5-12)
558. Cost of AZ Audit $5.7M (Exhibit L5-13)
559. PXE Environment>Device Boot>Network Card (Exhibit L5-14)
560. Election Systems Management BIOS Admin Panel (Exhibit L5-15)
561. Whistleblower Screenshots>Upgrade Checklist/Instruction for Modifying BIOS
(Exhibit L5-16)
562. Chinese Language Patent App RE: Graphene Oxide/NIH Graphene Oxide SARS-
CoV-2 Proteins (Exhibit L5-17)
563. In accordance with Florida Statute 98.0981(2)(a), a dash ( - ) represents detailed
groups (Election Day, Vote By Mail, Early Votes, Provisional) with between 1 and 29
votes, as seen on throughout Florida’s 67 Supervisor of Elections Results websites in the
Primary and General Elections. (Exhibits L6-9)
564. PBC 2020 General Election Official Results – Summary – only race summary
results with violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)
565. In Palm Beach County, there are 1000s of violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit
L6-L9)
126 of 256
566. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 – President - Trump v Biden Precinct Official Results with
Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L6-2)
567. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 Greg Musselwhite v. Alcee Hastings Precinct Official
Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L7-1)
568. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 Brian Mast v. Precinct Official Results with Violations of
98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L7-2)
569. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 Laura Loomer v. Lois Frankel Precinct Official Results
Containing Several Hundred Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L8-1)
570. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - US House of Representatives, District 22 - James “Jim”
Pruden v. Ted Deutch Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit
L9-1)
571. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Senator, District 25 - Gayle Harrell v. Corinna
Balderramos Robinson Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a)
(Exhibit L9-2)
572. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Senator, District 29 – Brian Norton v. Tina Polsky
Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-3)
573. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Senator, District 29 – Tami Donnelly v. Lori Berman
Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-4)
574. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 81 – Saulis Banionis v.
Kelly Skidmore Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-5)
575. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 82 – John Synder v. Elisa
Edwards Ackerly Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-
6)
127 of 256
576. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 85 – Rick Roth v. Jim
Carroll Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-7)
577. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 86 – Susan M. Kufdakis
Rivera v. Matt Whilhite Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a)
(Exhibit L9-8)
578. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 87 – Herb Sennett v. David
Silvers Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L9-9)
579. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 88 – Danielle Madsen v.
Omari Hardy Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L10-1)
580. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 89 – Mike Caruso v. Jim
Bonfiglio Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L10-2)
581. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 90 – Lydia Maldonado v.
Joseph A. Castello Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit
L10-3)
582. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - State Representative, District 91 – Sayd Hussain v. Emily
Ann Slosberg Precinct Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L10-4)
583. PBC Gen. Elec. 2020 - Sheriff – Lauro E. Diaz v. Ric L. Bradshaw Precinct
Official Results with Violations of 98.0981(2)(a) (Exhibit L10-5)
584. June 20, 2019, CBS ‘Florida city pays $600,000 to hackers who seized its
computer system: A Florida city agreed to pay $600,000 in ransom to hackers who took
over its computer system, the latest in thousands of attacks worldwide aimed at extorting
money from governments and businesses. The Riviera Beach City Council voted
unanimously this week to pay the hackers' demands, believing the Palm Beach suburb
128 of 256
had no choice if it wanted to retrieve its records, which the hackers encrypted.’ See
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/riviera-beach-florida-ransomware-attack-city-council-
pays-600000-to-hackers-who-seized-its-computer-system/
585. June 21, 2019, Palm Beach Post article ‘IN DEPTH: How Riviera Beach left the
door wide open for hackers: Riviera Beach’s new $800,000 computer security system
inexplicably was never installed. Why? The security system for the computers that hold
all the city’s vital data was so outdated, the company that made it didn’t even service it
anymore, Riviera Beach’s Interim Information Technology Manager, Justin Williams,
told the city council Feb. 20.’ See https://www.tampabay.com/florida-
politics/buzz/2020/02/13/this-florida-elections-office-was-attacked-by-ransomware-in-
2016-were-just-hearing-about-it/
586. Feb. 12, 2020, Palm Beach Post ‘Current Palm Beach County elections supervisor
Wendy Sartory Link said she recently learned about a 2016 ransomware attack at the
elections office.’ “We weren’t part of that, but have we been hacked in Palm Beach
County? Yeah, we have,” Link said during an Editorial Board interview. “He said, ‘One
thing I don’t know is about ... what happened with the hack we had back (in 2016), to
know if that’s still a problem,’” Link recalled Sacerio saying. ... longtime Information
technology director Jeff Darter was fired in conjunction with his November arrest on
charges relating to child porn possession. ″(Darter) never brought any of the staff into the
real conversations,” Sacerio said. “When he was containing the virus, he wouldn’t let us
help him.” “I’m already reeling from the fact that we just lost our IT director, and now
you’re telling me that there was a hack that no one bothered to share?” Link said
Wednesday. “It was a big deal,” “If they can break into the Pentagon, I can’t tell you they
129 of 256
can’t get into the Palm Beach County elections office,” Link said, referring to a 2018
breach of the Department of Defense. “What I can tell you is there is nothing that could
be done that we haven’t done.” Link said. See
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/20200212/exclusive-pbc-elections-office-
lsquohackedrsquo-by-ransomware-in-2016
587. Feb. 13, 2020, Tampa Bay Times ‘This Florida elections office was attacked by
ransomware in 2016. We’re just hearing about it: The previously unreported incursion
occurred in September 2016; the current supervisor of elections found out about it in
November 2019.’ “We feel very confident that we’re in very good shape now,” Link said.
Still, she said, “the bad actors that are doing these things, they come up with new things
every day.” Maurice Turner, deputy director of the Internet Architecture project at the
Center for Democracy and Technology said, “This was absolutely serious. It’s something
where, at a minimum, officials should have been notified,” Turner said. He added,
“Wouldn’t it be weird if someone broke into city hall and stole a bunch of files and no
one ever reported it?” “It only takes messing up a single time in order for the entire
infrastructure to be infected with ransomware,” Turner said.
https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2020/02/13/this-florida-elections-office-
was-attacked-by-ransomware-in-2016-were-just-hearing-about-it/
588. Aug. 19, 2020 Palm Beach Post article ‘Why PBC took all night to count ballots
despite new voting tech’ (See
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2020/08/19/why-pbc-took-all-night-to-
count-ballots-despite-new-voting-tech/113360996/)
130 of 256
589. September 16, 2020, Public Interest Legal Foundation published ‘CRITICAL
CONDITION: AMERICAN VOTER ROLLS FILLED WITH ERRORS, DEAD
VOTERS, AND DUPLICATE REGISTRATIONS’ finding that ‘349,773: total number
of potentially deceased registrants across 41 states. Michigan, Florida, New York, Texas
and California account for roughly 51% of national dead registrants.’; ‘Florida ranked 4th
highest in the country for deceased voters at 25,162’; (Publicly available at
https://publicinterestlegal.org/pilf-files/Report-Critical_Condition-Web-FINAL-
FINAL.pdf)
590. Signed Contract between Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and Palm
Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link
591. Nov. 4, 2020 Press Conference held by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis stating in
part, “...People are actually looking at Florida and asking the question, ‘Why can’t these
states by more like Florida?’... The way Florida did it inspires confidence. I think that’s
how elections should be run and I think it’s something that if you want to do it that way,
it requires you to take action. It requires certain actions and it requires to put effort into it,
but I think it’s worth it and I think the results speak for themselves. We’re now being
looked at as the state that did it right and the state other states should emulate... (Palm
Beach County and Broward County) did a great job and I commend both of those
supervisors in those counties for their hard work. I also appointed Laurel Lee as Secretary
of State and she conducted a review of our election infrastructure. We had a particular
focus on cyber security just because there have been threats in those areas and took
appropriate action... I want to thank Secretary of State Laurel Lee for all her hard work. I
told her we want this to run smoothly. It’s very important for public confidence and for
131 of 256
voters. I also want to thank all the supervisors and all the election workers... who worked
very, very hard and really did an admirable job up and down the state. Also, it’s
important that that runs well. Obviously, the machinery of democracy and transparently. I
would note that we are one of the few states in the country where you can follow the
number of people that are voting in real time the mail votes that are received, the early
votes, the election day vote. The rest of these states it’s kind of like a blackhole. Florida,
you know, you don’t necessarily know how they voted as its going but you know how
many Republicans are voting, how many Democrats, how many NPAs and I think that
really sets us apart so I think that’s really important. Obviously, we get into elections
because we want to get good results, as well. I worked really hard this campaign in a
number of different ways. Of course, I was supporting the President. He won a really
significant victory in the State of Florida. I think his barnstorming to the extent to which
campaigning matters, generally, I don’t know but I think in his case...He deserved a lot of
credit...I was also able to help two of our candidates for U.S. Congress in South Florida
Carlos Gimenez and Maria Elvira Salazar I think they’re going to do a great job in the
Congress. I think they’re going to represent South Florida very well. I worked with
Carols a lot with Coronavirus and can tell you Maria Elvira Salazar is gonna be a
superstar in the Congress. We were happy to see them succeed... The fact of the matter
is...you could have called (the election) as soon as the early vote and mail ballots came in
from Miami-Dade. If you think about it...polling has not gotten elections right since
2012...You know, if you’re that bad at your job, maybe some of these prognosticators
should find another line of work. I can’t think of another line of work then still be there...
I would just say, the way Florida approached it in a very transparent fashion, doing it in a
132 of 256
way that was focused on efficiency...producing results in a timely and transparent fashion
that inspires confidence... what you have in some of these other states, it’s a very opaique
process, there’s not a lot of transparency... even if everything is on the level... that is not
something that is going to transpire confidence, so I think some of those states should
have followed Florida’s lead on this. Now there’s one state...they announced, “We’re just
not gonna count ballots...” “Really? This is your one job. It’s a presidential election... I
can tell you, the people in Florida who work these elections, they work their tails off... I
look around the rest of the county and I don’t think that confidence is there. So, perhaps
2020 is the year we finally vanquished the ghost of Bush v. Gore. And as we watch what
unfolds in the rest of the country, I do think you’re going to continue to hear from people
if the third most populace state in the country can count eleven million votes, produce a
result across the board, why can’t some of these other states that are much smaller?”
(https://www.local10.com/news/local/2020/11/04/gov-ron-desantis-holds-news-
conference-in-tallahassee/)
592. Jan. 29, 2021 Palm Beach County’s CTCL Expenditure Report remaining funds
equal $1,346,731.76 (CHECK NAME OF DOCUMENT – EXHIBIT A-? – Expenditure
remaining funds document)
593. Feb. 9, 2021 Florida House Public Integrity and Elections Committee Hearing
Testimony given by Florida Secretary of State Laurel Lee stating she obtained an FBI
security clearance, attended ‘daily briefings’ with the FBI then held daily briefings with
local and state law enforcement.
(https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711)
133 of 256
594. Feb. 9, 2021 Florida House Public Integrity and Elections Committee Hearing
Testimony given by Peter Antonacci stating that he accepted money from CTCL which
he spent on hiring ‘Janitors’ to clean up after voters.
(https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711)
595. Admission of acceptance of $200K from CTCL by Florida Secretary of State
Laurel Lee (Feb. 9, 2021 Florida House Public Integrity and Elections Committee
Hearing Testimony given by Florida Secretary of State Laurel Lee)
(https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711)
596. Admission of acceptance of $400K from CTCL by Broward County’s Former
Supervisor of Elections Peter Antonacci (Feb. 9, 2021 Florida House Public Integrity and
Elections Committee Hearing Testimony)
(https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711)
597. Apr. 29, 2021, Fox News "Our original understanding of the grant was that it had
to be used for 2020, so we didn’t spend all of the money," Link told Fox News. "We are
now getting permission from CTCL to complete the purchases. So, to answer your
question, some of it would be for 2021, 2022, because some of that equipment, we
weren't able to get in time — whether it's equipment or the firewall, some of the security,
or IT security programs, didn’t get implemented," Link continued. "We knew we weren’t
going to have time to get them in as it turned out for 2020. So we didn’t purchase them
because we wanted to make sure we stayed within the definition of the grant, which at the
time was for 2020. We have since gotten permission for those now, so they are in that
process for some of the equipment and some of the IT programs." (See
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/zuckerberg-money-florida-desantis-reelection)
134 of 256
598. May 6, 2021 Governor Ron DeSantis signs Election Reform Bill (SB-90).
599. May 7, 2021, Fox News article, “Florida voting law signed by DeSantis stops
Mark Zuckerberg, others from bankrolling election administration” (See
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/florida-voting-law-ron-desantis-mark-zuckerberg-
election-administration)
600. June 14, 2021, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections admitted that she took
the $6.8M from Mark Zuckerberg. (Recorded interview by Laura Loomer’s team:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQaynIvdKZc&t=102s)
Laura Loomer: ...you accepted a $6.8M grant from Mark Zuckerberg.
Wendy Sartory Link: Correct.
Laura Loomer: You have to return the million dollars.
Wendy Sartory Link: Well, we don’t have a million dollars.
Laura Loomer: Well, according to the report you filled out you had over a
million.
Wendy Sartory Link: No. We gave – You asked for it and we gave you
what we had as of January 29th.
Laura Loomer: ...Fox News has a quote from you saying you have money
left over.
Wendy Sartory Link: We do have money left over. We will return the
money.
Laura Loomer: When do you plan on returning it?
Wendy Sartory Link: We’ll return it when the uhhh... legislation is
complete.
Laura Loomer: He already signed it though. (Note: bill was signed on May
6, 2021)
Wendy Sartory Link: Authorization’s complete. We are not spending any
of it. (Note: Total leftover from 2020 election, per PBCSOE documents
$1,346,731.76.)
135 of 256
601. According to Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections, as of June 14, 2021,
Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections, Wendy Sartory Link, no longer had the total
remaining CTCL funds of $1,346,731.76 nor had she returned it to CTCL. (Recorded
interview by Laura Loomer’s team:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQaynIvdKZc&t=102s)
602. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections, Wendy Sartory Link, by way of
spoken work, actions and contract has acted, in her official capacity, in a subservient
manner to CTCL instead of authoritatively on behalf of the people, as she was elected to
do. (See parag. ff; ii; parag. recorded interview by Laura Loomer’s team:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQaynIvdKZc&t=102s)
603. In every single precinct in Florida there is essential raw data missing in every
single race that is needed to calculate and tabulate the vote according to the Precinct-
Level Raw Data Official Results available on the Florida’s Division of Elections website.
(https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/data-statistics/elections-data/precinct-level-election-
results/; https://enr.electionsfl.org/PAL/2801/Summary/) (Exhibit 14: graphic of Palm
Beach County votes not counted and Division of Elections votes not counted)
604. There are enough statutory violations in Palm Beach County to express doubt as
to whether the 2020 Election cycle expressed the will of the voter. In such, the 2020
Election results must be set aside and the 2020 Election must be held anew to ensure
Plaintiff and the voters of Florida are not disenfranchised. (Exhibit 15 – Violations of
Statute 98.0981(2)(a) Creates Enough Fraud in Palm Beach County to Create Reasonable
Doubt the Election Expressed the Will of Votes)
136 of 256
605. At a certain point during the 2020 election cycle an algorithm kicked in and all of
Florida’s 67 counties weighted the vote in the presidential election to 51.2% of each vote
going to Trump and 47.8% of each vote going to Biden. If an algorithm can be used to
alter, manipulate and change the election results in the presidential election, in Florida,
then that algorithmic formula can be used in every race in every county throughout
Florida, which demonstrates enough doubt in the Florida election cycle that the election
results do not express the will of the voters that the 2020 Florida election must be set
aside and held anew, statewide. (Exhibit 16 – Algorithm Weighting Presidential Vote
Throughout Florida)
606. Valid Petitions in Broward County were rejected by the election software
demonstrating that the software is unreliable, fault and cannot be trusted to accurate count
the votes based on the will of the votes. All of Deerfield Beach, Margate, Coral Springs
and Coconut Creek are in District 22, so it is not possible for any petitions from those
districts to be in the ‘Wrong District’. It proves the software is rejecting valid petitions,
which means the software cannot be trust with voter’s data during the election cycle, as
well. In such, there is reasonable doubt the election results expressed the will of the
voters; it must be set aside and held anew because Scott’s right to ballot access was
violated, voters were disenfranchised from every qualified candidate and because fraud
vitiates everything. (Exhibit 17 – The internal Broward County software that originates
and shares data with the Division of Elections/Secretary of State/Department of State of
Florida, in Tallahassee gives false results and in such cannot be trusted or relied upon to
express the will of the voters)
137 of 256
607. The U.S. Constitution vests authority for the elections in the state, not local,
government. The state legislature is asked to treat all voters equally...These rules apply to
state government and that’s one of the reasons why federal government requires a state
plan, not a city plan, for elections. (see https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-
taft/2021/03/23/who-are-these-outsiders-big-tech-zuck-bucks-paid-government-election-
offices-to-become-turn-out-machines-for-biden-in-2020-election-n1433764)
608. Mark Zuckerberg outspent U.S. government financing the U.S. election.
(https://politicalvelcraft.org/2020/12/26/mark-zuckerberg-out-spent-u-s-government-
financing-the-u-s-elections/)
609. Mark Zuckerberg’s universal base income is socialism on steroids
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f34tBfZKdmI). Zuckerberg funneled money into the
2020 election cycle to install politicians who would work toward Zuckerberg’s goal of
overthrowing the government and turning it into a socialist/communist regime.
610. CTCL sent agents into states to recruit certain Democrats, which is lobbying.
CTCL is not a licensed lobbyist. It is also in violation of CTCL’s status as a 501(c)(3). It
also proves that CTCL influenced voting and elections in 11 counties, in Florida.
611. Privatization of Elections undermines the Help American Vote Act (HAVA),
which requires state election plans to be submitted to federal officials and approved and
requires respect for equal protection by making all resources available equally to all
voters. Zuckerberg, each 501(c)(3) that funded elections, SOS Lee and the eleven
Supervisors of Elections that participated in private funds flowing into local and county
elections violated the equal protection rights of all Florida voters and their duty to uphold
the U.S. and Florida Constitutions, per the oath of Fla. Stat. 876.05. Since Zuckerberg,
138 of 256
the 501(c)(3)s and other entity defendants operated in relation the Florida elections each
individual or entity was required to abide by and support the U.S. and Florida
Constitutions but failed to do so, in direct violation of Fla. Stat. 876.05.
612. Since these private funds, associated individuals and entities had a goal of
overthrowing the U.S. and Florida governments they have levied war against the voters
of Florida, as well as the United States. There is reasonable doubt that an enemy
combatant is expressing the will of Florida voters in its attempt to overthrow the
government both in Florida and in the U.S.
613. The illegitimate infusion of private funding and 3rd party promotion of training,
equipment, security, staffing and reporting programs by a network of private nonprofits at
the county level bypassed state administrative processes, which SOS Lee encouraged,
and violated legislative prerogatives codified in state Help America Vote Plans (HAVA),
resulting in questions about the integrity of the Florida and U.S. electoral systems.
614. The appropriate mechanism for charitable donations for electoral purposes is
through donations earmarked into the general fund of the state legislature. Zuckerberg,
CZI, CTCL, Google and other entities and individual defendants intentionally bypassed
proper procedure to corruptly influence the 2020 Election cycle.
615. There is no state or federal statutory authority for counties to solicit, receive, or
appropriate private funding outside of state HAVA implementation plans.
616. The 11 Florida counties that received CTCL funds are in violation of HAVA
254(a)(5) and other federal obligations. (Exhibit 18 – 11 Florida Counties Not Following
Federal Guidelines)
139 of 256
617. HAVA and Florida state funds received for FL Elections in 2018 and 2020
(Exhibit 19: Total funds received on behalf of Florida elections from state and federal
government for the 2018 and 2020 election cycles)
618. The private money laundered through non-profits was intended to benefit the
Biden campaign and certain ‘chosen’ down ballot candidates. Non-profit 501(c)(3)s are
barred from supporting specific candidates or parties. By law, contributions of time or
money or in-kind support to a candidate or party are expressly prohibited. Yet, Mark
Zuckerberg’s donations were made anyway, in direct defiance of regulations put in place
to protect the sanctity of the vote. There is reasonable doubt that the will of the voter was
expressed in the 2020 election cycle. In such, the 2020 election must be set aside and held
anew.
619. No breakdown of votes (Exhibit 20 – DOS official raw data showing no
breakdown of votes or party affiliation votes), per category, was included in the official
2020 Florida Election Raw Data totals, nor is the breakdown of how any Republican,
Democrats and Others voted which is a violation of Florida Statute. In fact, each
infraction is a separate non-compliance with Florida statutes making the total number of
statutory fractions likely over 100K. In accordance with Kinney v. Putnam County
Canvassing Board by and through Harris, 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) An
election should be set aside if there is substantial non-compliance with a statutory
election procedure because it creates reasonable doubt the certified election expressed the
will of the voters. There are 10s of 1000s, if not 100s of 1000s of violations at a precinct
level where dashes have been inserted instead of numbers. There is no way to know or
prove what the vote actually is, in Florida. So much time has passed and so much fraud
140 of 256
has occurred and there was been such a repeated break in the chain of custody at all
levels, even the physical ballots cannot be trusted, particularly since we know the FBI
was involved in other counties in the country, in shredding ballots to hide fraud. There is
an absolute necessity that Florida’s 2020 election cycle be set aside and held anew since
there is doubt the results expressed the will of the voters. ‘In alleging fraud in the
inducement, plaintiff need not plead that he was "precluded" from discovering truth as to
misrepresentation of facts so long as complaint alleges reasonable reliance on material
misrepresentations of existing facts.’ Avila South Condominium Ass'n, Inc v. Kappa
Corp, 347 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1977)
620. The Official Raw Data for the General Election for 2020 has no headers which is
in violation of Fla. Stat. 98.0981.
621. Chain of Custody lost for all ES&S machines used in Florida during the Primary
and General Elections, in 2020. (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/flashback-
cellular-modems-found-voting-machines-chain-custody-lost-official-results-cant-trusted/)
(Exhibit 21 – Broward County machines connect to the internet. They are the same ES&S
machines used throughout 49 counties in Florida. In such, there is reasonable doubt the
will of the voter was expressed during the 2020 election cycle. (Exhibit 21 – pics of
Broward County ES&S machines able to connect to internet)
622. Mary Fanning’s visual showing of how 2020 Election results were Intercepted by
China, the Switched Out with Different Results before being Forwarded to Washington
(Exhibit 22 – Screenshots of Election Totals being intercepted by foreign interference;
https://lindelltv.com/absolute-proof/)
141 of 256
623. Florida Has Enough Proof of Fraud to De-Certify the 2020 Election Without
Wasting Millions on a Forensic Audit
COUNT I – ELECTION FRAUD (CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Under Florida law, constructive fraud occurs where the plaintiff establishes that both:
- The plaintiff and defendant were in a confidential or fiduciary relationship.
- The defendant:
o Abused a duty owed to the plaintiff; or
o Took unfair advantage of the plaintiff.
Hansen v. Premiere Aviation Holdings, LLC, 2017 WL8893119 *3 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 21,
2017) (applying Florida Law; Levy v. Levy, 862 So. 2d 48, 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
Constructive fraud can be based on
- Misrepresentation
- Concealment
- Abuse of a duty owed to the plaintiff
- Act of taking improper advantage of the parties’ fiduciary relationship at the plaintiff’s
expense
Beers v. Beers, 724 So. 2d 109, 116-17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
FACTS
624. There is a fiduciary relationship between defendants and plaintiff.
625. The defendants each, in their own way, took part in the election fraud.
142 of 256
626. Each defendant took party in the 2020 Election cycle, in varying ways.
627. Within each defendant’s involvement in the 2020 Election cycle, as it happened
within Florida, had a fiduciary relationship with each voter.
628. That fiduciary relationship is based on trust.
629. The defendants abused the duty they owed Plaintiff, as a candidate, elector and
taxpayer, and all voters in Florida.
630. The defendants took unfair advantage of Plaintiff and all Florida voters by
attempting to influence Florida’s election cycle in an attempt to determine who did and/or
did not gain ballot access.
631. Each of the defendants had a fiduciary relationship with the Plaintiff, and every
Floridian voter, in a variety of ways depending on the area of expertise, experience,
knowledge and/or employment of each particular defendant.
632. Each of the public servants, as described throughout Scott’s pleading has violated
Scott’s right to ballot access by their specific actions or lack of actions per their duty,
authority and/or responsibility and/or by aiding in a conspiratorial manner to prevent
Scott from gaining ballot access and from allowing her vote to be counted.
633. Defendants each had a part in ensuring the votes in Florida were not counted.
634. While not all defendants were aware of each other individual defendant, they all
took and action or refused to take a necessary action which, in turn, negatively and
intentionally affected the outcome of the 2020 Election and/or attempted to cover up the
misconduct, fraud and/or public corruption.
143 of 256
635. Many of the defendant tech companies have government contract which means
that each of their employees has an obligation to support both the US and Florida
Constitutions.
636. The government contracts mean that each and every employee must be a citizen
of the United States, but that fact is that many of the employees are not citizens of the
United States.
637. For those companies who have direct or indirect contracts with Florida, each has
an obligation that their employees are both citizens of the United States as well as
citizens of the State of Florida, but the fact is that many of the employees of these
companies are not citizens of the United States.
638. For these companies to do business with the State of Florida under false pretense
is constructive fraud because they had a fiduciary relationship with the state of Florida
and, in such, with the voters of Florida to ensure that each voter could trust the process
and every company involved in the election process.
639. No foreign interference is allowed in U.S. or Florida elections.
640. All of the big tech defendants have participated in one way or another in the
Florida election process.
641. All of the big tech defendants have foreigners and non-Floridians working for
them, which violates the oath each company’s employees agree to before they ever work
for, with, on behalf of any Florida government agency or entity including contractors and
subcontractors.
642. China is a foreign entity. It does not have a right to be involved in U.S. and/or
Florida Elections.
144 of 256
643. China has a presence in businesses that were in involved in the Florida elections.
644. China has a war doctrine that states it is at war with the United States. In such,
China considers itself an enemy of the United States. For China to be involved in any
aspect of any U.S. and/or Florida election China has committed constructive fraud
because through the companies it is involved in, including but not limited to Dominion,
Staple Street Capital, Apple, Microsoft, and others, China has used the company involved
in Florida elections to violated that company's fiduciary relationship it had with Florida,
Florida voters and Plaintiff.
645. China, by way of the companies it has controlling, ownership or some other direct
and indirect relationship with, it has abused the duty owed to Plaintiff and Florida voters.
646. Dominion Voting Systems misrepresented itself as a company that had the legal
right conduct business regarding U.S. and Florida elections, which it did not have the
right to do as a foreign entity and as an enemy of the State due to its ties to China.
647. 18 counties in Florida used Dominion due, in part, to Dominion’s concealment of
its ties to China.
648. Dominion knew or should have known that it was a foreign based company
having no right to involve itself in Florida and U.S. elections.
649. Dominion, China and Staple Street Capital took improper advantage of its
fiduciary relationship at the expense of Plaintiff and Florida voters.
650. Apple, Google, YouTube and Alphabet all have relationships including internal
structural business models and/or functions with China by way of doing business in
China because all businesses that do business in China agree to give China access to that
company’s intellectual property. Each of the above-mentioned tech giants does business
145 of 256
in China which means each has allowed China access into the companies' inner workings.
Each of these companies also has a presence in the United States. In fact, each is a U.S.
owned-company. Each of the companies suppressed concerns about vote by mail ballots
before the election, many conservative and Republican voices which affected how voters
voted during the 2020 election. This was an attack of cyber warfare against U.S. and
Florida voters because it was meant to influence the outcome of the elections in a
subversive, illegal manner that violates the U.S.C. 230 platform-not-a-publisher
agreement by each of the companies operates. Further, it was done in bad faith, which
also violates U.S.C. 230. In such each of these companies and their respective executives
who ultimately determine the directions and actions of each of the companies,
respectively, misrepresented itself to Florida voters and Plaintiff. Each of these
businesses concealed their relationship with China and the CCP. Each of these businesses
acting on behalf of a foreign entity and an enemy of the United States and Florida by
using propaganda and other nefarious and illegal means to influence the U.S. and Florida
outcome relating to the 2020 Election cycle. This violated each company’s fiduciary duty
to Scott and Florida voters. Each of the companies abused the duty it owed to the plaintiff
and Florida voters by using their products and/or platforms in a subversive manner to
overthrow the governments of Florida and the United States. Each company took
improper advantage of their fiduciary relationship at the plaintiff’s expense, and at the
expense of Florida voters. These companies violated the U.S. and Florida Constitution
which is not in good faith. The above-mentioned companies misrepresented themselves
and their intentions.
146 of 256
651. Each tech company that operates under U.S.C. 230 has a fiduciary duty to operate
within election guidelines, which includes no foreign interference (in accordance with
U.S. election laws) and not acting as publisher, but instead only as a platform, per U.S.C.
230. The code also mandates the platforms operate in good faith. Facebook, Twitter,
Google, Alphabet, YouTube, WIX, PayPal and GoFundMe all used their platforms to
suppress voices of conservatives, Republicans, Patriots and oath keepers, which is a
violation of U.S. and Florida Constitution because it violates free speech. Each has a
contract with the government. In such, each is obligated to operate within the realm of the
U.S. and Florida constitutions. These tech companies have misrepresented themselves.
They had a fiduciary relationship to each voter not to inhibit or prevent their right to vote.
By their mere operation under U.S.C. 230 each demonstrates its fiduciary relationship to
each voter and to abide by the U.S. Constitution and to follow U.S.C. 230 in good faith.
The fact that these companies attempted to suppress voter information relating to the
2020 election issues and candidates, as well as coronavirus is a direct assault on each
voter’s right to vote and be informed. Propaganda is not information; it is an attempt to
sway a person’s opinion based on false facts.
652. Attempts to misinform, scare and terrify voters regarding coronavirus in order to
force them to vote using vote by mail instead of voting in person is a breach of fiduciary
duty by the defendants that was owed to plaintiff and all voters in Florida. Each of the
social media sites as well as the CDC, China, Biden, Hunter, Pelosi, Gates, Zuckerberg,
Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Microsoft, Blackrock, GoFundMe, WIX,
Alphabet, Amazon, AWS, PayPal, Apple and the FBI and Fauci abused their fiduciary
duty owed to the plaintiff and Florida voters.
147 of 256
653. Microsoft either knew or should have known that SQL Server made the voting
systems unsafe even if the machines were not hooked up to the internet. Companies are
ultimately responsible for the products they make. The executives at Microsoft and
Blackrock (who is a major shareholder in Microsoft) have a duty to ensure their products
are used in a lawful and constitutional way. SQL Server has the ability to change votes at
a local level. Microsoft and Blackrock executives had a fiduciary duty to inform plaintiff
and Florida voters, but way of election officials or directly, that their system was used in
tandem with Dominion and ES&S which allowed votes to be changed out at a local level
without the need of a Dominion or ES&S password. Microsoft and Blackrock owed this
duty to Plaintiff and Florida voters because Microsoft has contracts with the State of
Florida and, in such, is obligated that each employee support the U.S. and Florida
Constitutions and the laws of Florida. Microsoft and Blackrock abused their duty to Scott
and Florida voters by allowing their product to be used to infiltrate, alter, manipulate and
change vote results in Florida. Microsoft and Blackrock took improper advantage of the
fiduciary relationship they willfully and intentionally signed onto the minute they
received even a single government contract within the State of Florida. Microsoft and
Blackrock misrepresented and concealed the facts about the safety of their product in
relation to how SQL Server interacted with voting equipment and how that could
fraudulently be misused and abused to the point of altering the outcome of the election
results in the State of Florida, which harmed Scott and every voter in Florida.
654. If any company thinks they are too large to be responsible for the actions of their
company and its products then that company is too large and endangers Americans and
Floridians. Founders, co-founders, board members and executives guide a company.
148 of 256
When these individuals refuse to ensure their products are safe or think it doesn’t matter,
particularly in relation to a government contract which says they will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States and the Florida Constitution, then their neglect will
harm them, not the voters of Florida. These individuals had an obligation to ensure they
operated within the contracts which they signed with the state. When the companies
which these individuals breach the contract, they become personally liable for the
wrongdoings, misconduct and fraud that has occurred as a result of the violation of
fiduciary obligation which they failed to uphold. These individuals abused the duty they
owed to Scott and to every Florida voter. They took improper advantage of Scott and
Florida voters at the expense of Scott and Florida voters. They harmed Scott as a
candidate and as a voter.
655. CTCL, Facebook and CZI operated as front organizations/companies/corporations
for Mark Zuckerberg’s desire to oust President Trump and as tools for Zuckerberg and
other defendants to overthrow the U.S. and Florida governments. Zuckerberg, CTCL,
Facebook and CZI have contracts within Florida’s governmental structure. In such, they
have a duty to uphold, support and defend the U.S. and Florida constitutions which they
violated. Each misrepresented themselves by signing a contract which made them
fiduciaries to the People of Florida to uphold, support and defend the U.S. and Florida
Constitutions. Instead, each of the defendants attempted to overthrow the government of
Florida and of the United States which was an abuse of a duty owned to the Plaintiff and
the People of Florida. Each of the defendants took unfair advantage of the Plaintiff and
all Florida voters.
149 of 256
COUNT II – AIDING IN ELECTION FRAUD 104.091
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.091
- Arrest: Taking physical custody of a person by lawful authority.
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
- Trial: A hearing that takes place when the defendant pleads "not guilty" and witnesses
are required to come to court to give evidence.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be
punished in like manner as the principal offender.
(2) Any person who agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person to
commit a violation of this code shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation.
(3) Any person who knows of a felony violation of this code and gives any aid to the offender
who has violated this code, with intent that the offender avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or
punishment, shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. This subsection does
not prohibit a member of The Florida Bar from giving legal advice to a client.
FACTS
656. Each of the public servant defendants – officials and employees – aided in the
illegal act of ensuring Scott did not gain ballot access ignoring 1) the fact that she had
legally obtained more than enough valid petitions to have her name placed on the ballot;
150 of 256
and 2) by refusing to put her on the put her on the General Election ballot as a NPA
which had already been done for a Broward County Sheriff candidate during the 2020
Election cycle and which fell into the realm of solutions, at that time.
657. In so doing, each public servant chose to aid in the disenfranchisement the voters
in District 22 – Palm Beach County and Broward County, which is a violation of the
Florida and U.S. Constitutions.
658. In such, each public servant defendant’s act of aiding was a violation of their oath
to uphold the U.S. and FL Constitutions.
659. Each of the public servants agreed to with another person(s) to commit a violation
of this code.
660. Each of the public servants conspired to illegally keep Scott of the ballot and to
disenfranchise the voters of Broward County and Palm Beach County.
661. ES&S and Dominion aided rogue Florida public servants in an attempt to
overthrow the Florida and more broadly the U.S. government and throw it into the arms
of globalism and communisms. The tactics used misrepresented the truth about votes,
vote counts and gave false representation of the facts to mislead the voters of Florida. In
such, the actions of Dominion and ES&S puts in doubt whether or not the 2020 election
expressed the will of the voters. (‘Kinney v. Putnam’) It was ES&S and Dominions
intention to deceive the voters of Florida into believing the fraud vote was accurate.
662. Each of the named defendant executives relating to ES&S and Dominion allowed
the fraud against the voters of Florida to take place and, in such, aiding in the deception
to steal Florida’s 2020 Election, which creates doubt as to the election results and
whether it expressed the will of the people.
151 of 256
663. Amazon’s subsidiary, Amazon Web Services, shut down Patriot, Republican,
Conservative and Freedom loving websites in an attempt to lure U.S. voters to vote for
Biden. This was a violation of U.S.C. 230, an act of bad faith, a violation of this code. It
deprived voters of the ability be informed as to opinions that might interest them
regarding the election cycle and candidates. These actions were meant to misrepresent the
truth and to direct and control people’s thinking regarding candidates and who people
would vote for, which was an act of agreeing to conspire against the right to choose for
one’s self which candidate to vote for. The goal was to limit opportunities to learn and
hear various and differing viewpoints. The goal was to corruptly influence Florida’s
elections by depriving American citizens of their right to free speech. The goal was to
disenfranchise voters and to corruptly influence them. Jeff Bezo, Amazon and the many
executives at Amazon and AWS aiding in this conspiracy to violate this code.
664. Even though Scott had paid WIX for unlimited bandwidth during the 2020
election cycle, WIX put the bandwidth on the slowest possible bandwidth, to increase the
load time of her site and to frustrate people into leaving the site before reading Scott’s
views. They also repeatedly blocked Scott’s email campaigns even though they charged
her for them. These actions were taken by WIX to influence and impact the 2020
election, to make sure voters didn’t have the access to Candidate Scott. WIX repeatedly
broke Scott’s links to her donation site to ensure she could not receive campaign
donations. It was an attempt to hurt Scott’s chances of winning. Although, Scott did not
know it at the time, after encounter so many attacked by WIX and its employees, Scott
looked into the company and found that WIX is a foreign company based in Tel Aviv.
WIX is an enemy of the People of the United States and actively hurts Florida Candidates
152 of 256
to influence the Florida election cycle. WIX has violated this code and should be
punished as a principal offender. Voters were disenfranchised by WIX’s attack against
Scott’s campaign. Scott assumes the attack was not personal but was a wider spread
attack by WIX on American patriots. WIX aided in disenfranchising voters Palm Beach
County and Broward County. WIX conspired against Scott to keep her off the ballot.
665. During Scott’s time petitioning to gain ballot access between November 2019 and
March 2020 Scott was prevented from campaigning 27 times on 25 different days by
deputies and police in Palm Beach County and Broward County. Scott explained her
constitutional right to petition at open-to-the-public locations, the Supreme Court rulings
and Florida law backing up her right to petition at locations that are open to the public.
The deputies violated Scott’s right to petition in an attempt to keep her off the ballot.
They violated this code, their own and Scott’s Constitutional right to petition and to
ballot access. The law enforcement officers who violated this code made it clear that they
worked for the corporations who had called them rather than the People of Florida, which
is tyranny. This was not all law enforcement, many new the laws and our Constitution
and respected Scott’s right to petition, but 27 times on 25 separate days Scott’s right to
petition was violated. Since Scott collected approximately 100 petitions, per day, during
the 2020 election cycle, the negative impact harmed Scott and was enough to make a
severe difference in her ballot access particularly with how avidly the BC and PBC SOE
staff were erroneously rejecting Scott’s petitions. BC and PBC law enforcement aiding in
conspiratorial actions to keep Scott off the ballot and to disenfranchise voters in BC and
PBC.
153 of 256
666. On June 26, 2020 Scott filed a case regarding election fraud in the Broward
County Circuit Court, Fort Lauderdale. The Broward County Clerks hid filed from the
judge until after hearing and conspired with opposing counsel to fraudulently file an
order written Broward County Counsel and filed by the Judicial Assistant before either
Scott or the Judge had seen the order. This was done twice. As a result, Scott properly
added the Broward County Clerk to the case. In Aug. 2021, the Fourth District Court of
Appeals clerk, KH, illegally removed the Broward County Clerk from the case. The
Broward County Clerk was aiding the Broward County attorneys and BC SOE in
preventing Scott from having a fair trial in a conspiratorial attempt to keep her off the
2020 Primary Ballot and to disenfranchise voters in Broward County which is a violation
of this code.
667. Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan used their wealth via CZI to funnel funds
into CTCL and other 501(c)(3)s to illegally influence the 2020 election cycle in an
attempt to keep Trump and other Patriots from gaining or being re-elected it political
offices. CTCL heavily favored democrat districts and promoted vote by mail, while at the
same time Zuckerberg’s site Facebook removed conservative, patriotic and Republic
posts as well as information that questioned some of the media coming out about
coronavirus. These efforts were to aid in violations of this code.
668. GoFundMe, PayPal, Twitter, Microsoft, WIX, Apple, CDC, Google, YouTube
and Amazon all used their sites and subsidiaries to corruptly influence the outcome of the
2020 election cycle, in Florida, which violates this code. Each of their parent companies
agreed to this influence which is evidenced that they did not stop or attempt to stop the
154 of 256
corrupt influence. In such, each of the executives is liable for the harm these companies
caused Scott and for disenfranchising Florida voters as a whole.
669. Scott had contacted the FBI during the 2020 Election cycle and reported the
election fraud that had taken place by election officials. The FBI, to the best of Scott’s
knowledge and understanding, took no action to correct the violations of this code.
670. On Feb. 9, 2021, SOS Lee confessed during a FL House Public Integrity &
Elections Committee hearing that she had obtained a security clearance from the FBI,
attended daily briefings and relayed information obtained from the FBI to local and state
law enforcement throughout the State of Florida. SOS Lee is not law enforcement. She
had no right to exclude the public from meetings or to have private meetings with the
FBI. SOS Lee must conduct her business in the sunshine. SOS Lee violated the Sunshine
Law. She acted as the FBI’s stooge. The FBI told her what to do, then she obediently
relayed the dictation to Florida’s state and local law enforcement. All of which means
SOS Lee acted in a tyrannical manner against the will of the voters to influence the vote
and who obtained ballot access based on the FBI’s preference. In and of itself that should
be enough to remove SOS Lee from office and to cast enough doubt on the election to set
it aside. (https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=6711). SOS Lee
has violated multiple statutes, as well as this code due to her willingness to allow the FBI
in ways that corruptly influenced the Florida Election cycle.
COUNT III – USE OF WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION TO INTERFERE WITH FAIR ELECTION
PROCESS IN FLORIDA
155 of 256
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
PARTIES
Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Mark Zuckerberg, CDC, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft,
Google, Apple, GoFundMe, China, Nancy Pelosi
STANDARD OF REVIEW
790.166 Manufacture, possession, sale, delivery, display, use, or attempted or threatened use of
a weapon of mass destruction or hoax weapon of mass destruction prohibited; definitions;
penalties. —
(a) “Weapon of mass destruction” means:
1. Any device or object that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to
any human or animal, or severe emotional or mental harm to any human, through the release,
dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;
2. Any device or object involving a biological agent;
3. Any device or object that is designed or intended to release radiation or radioactivity at a
level dangerous to human or animal life; or
4. Any biological agent, toxin, vector, or delivery system.
(c) “Biological agent” means any microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological
product that may be engineered through biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or
bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological
product, capable of causing:
1. Death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or other
living organism;
2. Deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or
3. Deleterious alteration of the environment.
(d) “Toxin” means the toxic material of plants, animals, microorganisms, viruses, fungi, or
infectious substances, or a recombinant molecule, whatever its origin or method of reproduction,
including:
1. Any poisonous substance or biological product that may be engineered through
biotechnology produced by a living organism; or
2. Any poisonous isomer or biological product, homolog, or derivative of such substance.
(e) “Delivery system” means:
1. Any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specifically designed to deliver or
disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector; or
156 of 256
2. Any vector.
(f) “Vector” means a living organism or molecule, including a recombinant molecule or
biological product that may be engineered through biotechnology, capable of carrying a
biological agent or toxin to a host.
(6) Proof that a device or object described in subparagraph (1)(a)1. caused death or serious
bodily injury to a human or animal through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or
poisonous chemicals, or their precursors, is prima facie evidence that the device or object was
designed or intended to cause such death or serious bodily injury. Proof that a device or object
described in subparagraph (1)(a)3. released radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to
human or animal life is prima facie evidence that the device or object was designed or intended
for such release.
(9) In addition to any other penalty provided by law with respect to any person who is
convicted of a violation of this section that resulted in the mobilization or action of any law
enforcement officer or any state or local agency, a person convicted of a violation of this section
may be required by the court to pay restitution for all of the costs and damages arising from the
criminal conduct.
FACTS
671. Named defendants and their parent companies by complicit behavior participated
in one or more of the following to harm Scott and Floridian voters and to corruptly
influence the 2020 Election cycle by way of a biological attack.
672. Fauci, Gates, CDC and China manufactured and/or patented the coronavirus as a
biological weapon of mass destruction to harm Floridians and to scare voters into staying
away from polling locations and influencing them to vote by mail instead. Defendant
social media sites blocked and suppressed balanced, informative, level-headed and
responsible views which did not happen to agree with the maniacal, hysterical, one-sided
and fear-filled narrative in an attempt to corruptly and disproportionately influence voters
to vote by mail to violate the election code.
673. Scott and Florida voters have been harmed and many died as a result of this
biological attack that was perpetrated against voters of Florida in a conspiratorial manner
by all defendants directly or indirectly, in order to overthrow the government by stealing
157 of 256
the vote on a national level, but also and more specifically as it relates to this case, in the
State of Florida. In such, there is reasonable doubt that the will of the voters was
expressed in Florida’s 2020 Election cycle. Therefore, the election should be set aside
and held anew. (Exhibit 14 – Google touts illegal suppression of Patriot, American and
Republican voices in violation of U.S.C. 230 and the U.S. Constitutional right to free
speech. (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/youtube-brags-removing-10-
million-videos-per-quarter-censoring-truth-covid19-join-president-trumps-class-action-
lawsuit/)
COUNT IV – CIVIL RICO
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
895.02 Definitions. — As used in ss. 895.01-895.08, the term:
(1) “Beneficial interest” means any of the following:
(a) The interest of a person as a beneficiary under a trust established pursuant to s. 689.07 or s.
689.071 in which the trustee for the trust holds legal or record title to real property;
(b) The interest of a person as a beneficiary under any other trust arrangement pursuant to
which a trustee holds legal or record title to real property for the benefit of such person; or
(c) The interest of a person under any other form of express fiduciary arrangement pursuant to
which any other person holds legal or record title to real property for the benefit of such person.
158 of 256
The term “beneficial interest” does not include the interest of a stockholder in a corporation or
the interest of a partner in either a general partnership or a limited partnership. A beneficial
interest shall be deemed to be located where the real property owned by the trustee is located.
(2) “Civil proceeding” means any civil proceeding commenced by an investigative agency
under s. 895.05 or any other provision of the Florida RICO Act.
(3) “Criminal proceeding” means any criminal proceeding commenced by an investigative
agency under s. 895.03 or any other provision of the Florida RICO Act.
(4) “Documentary material” means any book, paper, document, writing, drawing, graph, chart,
photograph, phonorecord, magnetic tape, computer printout, other data compilation from which
information can be obtained or from which information can be translated into usable form, or
other tangible item.
(5) “Enterprise” means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business
trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union,
association, or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity; and it includes
illicit as well as licit enterprises and governmental, as well as other, entities. A criminal gang, as
defined in s. 874.03, constitutes an enterprise.
(6) “Investigative agency” means the Department of Legal Affairs, the Office of Statewide
Prosecution, or the office of a state attorney.
(7) “Pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering
conduct that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of
commission or that otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not
isolated incidents, provided at least one of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1977, and
that the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering
conduct.
(8) “Racketeering activity” means to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or
to solicit, coerce, or intimidate another person to commit:
(a) Any crime that is chargeable by petition, indictment, or information under the following
provisions of the Florida Statutes:
24. Section 777.03, relating to commission of crimes by accessories after the fact.
25. Chapter 782, relating to homicide.
26. Chapter 784, relating to assault and battery.
27. Chapter 787, relating to kidnapping or human trafficking.
28. Chapter 790, relating to weapons and firearms.
31. Chapter 806, relating to arson and criminal mischief.
32. Chapter 810, relating to burglary and trespass.
159 of 256
33. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes.
34. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes.
35. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices, false pretenses, fraud generally, credit card
crimes, and patient brokering.
36. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, or exploitation of an elderly person or disabled
adult.
37. Section 827.071, relating to commercial sexual exploitation of children.
39. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting.
41. Section 836.05, relating to extortion.
42. Chapter 837, relating to perjury.
43. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office.
44. Chapter 843, relating to obstruction of justice.
47. Chapter 874, relating to criminal gangs.
48. Chapter 893, relating to drug abuse prevention and control.
49. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions.
50. Sections 914.22 and 914.23, relating to tampering with or harassing a witness, victim, or
informant, and retaliation against a witness, victim, or informant.
51. Sections 918.12 and 918.13, relating to tampering with jurors and evidence.
(b) Any conduct defined as “racketeering activity” under 18 U.S.C. s. 1961(1).
(c) Any violation of Title 68, Florida Administrative Code, relating to the illegal sale,
purchase, collection, harvest, capture, or possession of wild animal life, freshwater aquatic life,
or marine life, and related crimes.
(9) “Real property” means any real property or any interest in such real property, including, but
not limited to, any lease of or mortgage upon such real property.
(10) “RICO lien notice” means the notice described in s. 895.05(13) or in s. 895.07.
(11) “Trustee” means any of the following:
(a) Any person acting as trustee pursuant to a trust established under s. 689.07 or s. 689.071 in
which the trustee holds legal or record title to real property.
(b) Any person who holds legal or record title to real property in which any other person has a
beneficial interest.
(c) Any successor trustee or trustees to any or all of the foregoing persons.
160 of 256
895.03 Prohibited activities and defense. —
(1) It is unlawful for any person who has with criminal intent received any proceeds
derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through the
collection of an unlawful debt to use or invest, whether directly or indirectly, any part of such
proceeds, or the proceeds derived from the investment or use thereof, in the acquisition of any
title to, or any right, interest, or equity in, real property or in the establishment or operation of
any enterprise.
(2) It is unlawful for any person, through a pattern of racketeering activity or through the
collection of an unlawful debt, to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or
control of any enterprise or real property.
(3) It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise to
conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of
racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt.
(4) It is unlawful for any person to conspire or endeavor to violate any of the provisions of
subsection (1), subsection (2), or subsection (3).
895.05 Civil remedies. —
(1) Any circuit court may, after making due provision for the rights of innocent persons,
enjoin violations of the provisions of s. 895.03 by issuing appropriate orders and judgments,
including, but not limited to:
(a) Ordering any defendant to divest himself or herself of any interest in any enterprise,
including real property.
(b) Imposing reasonable restrictions upon the future activities or investments of any
defendant, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any defendant from engaging in the
same type of endeavor as the enterprise in which the defendant was engaged in violation of
the provisions of s. 895.03.
(c) Ordering the dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise.
(d) Ordering the suspension or revocation of a license, permit, or prior approval granted to any
enterprise by any agency of the state.
(e) Ordering the forfeiture of the charter of a corporation organized under the laws of the state,
or the revocation of a certificate authorizing a foreign corporation to conduct business within the
state, upon finding that the board of directors or a managerial agent acting on behalf of the
corporation, in conducting the affairs of the corporation, has authorized or engaged in conduct in
violation of s. 895.03 and that, for the prevention of future criminal activity, the public interest
requires the charter of the corporation forfeited and the corporation dissolved or the certificate
revoked.
161 of 256
(2)(a) All property, real or personal, including money, used in the course of, intended for use in
the course of, derived from, or realized through conduct in violation of ss. 895.01-895.05 is
subject to civil forfeiture to the state.
(b) An investigative agency may, on behalf of the state, institute a civil proceeding for
forfeiture in the circuit court for the judicial circuit in which real or personal tangible property, as
described in paragraph (a) is located. An investigative agency may, on behalf of the state,
institute a civil proceeding for forfeiture in a circuit court in the state regarding intangible
property as described in paragraph (a).
(c) Upon the entry of a final judgment of forfeiture in favor of the state, the title of the state to
the forfeited property shall relate back:
1. In the case of real property or a beneficial interest, to the date of filing of the RICO lien
notice in the official records of the county where the real property or beneficial trust is located; if
no RICO lien notice is filed, then to the date of the filing of any notice of lis pendens under s.
895.07(5)(a) in the official records of the county where the real property or beneficial interest is
located; and if no RICO lien notice or notice of lis pendens is filed, then to the date of recording
of the final judgment of forfeiture in the official records of the county where the real property or
beneficial interest is located.
2. In the case of personal property, to the date the personal property was seized by the
investigating agency.
(d) If property subject to forfeiture is conveyed, alienated, disposed of, diminished in value, or
otherwise rendered unavailable for forfeiture, the investigative agency may, on behalf of the
state, institute an action in any circuit court against the person named in the RICO lien notice or
the defendant in the civil proceeding or criminal proceeding, and the court shall enter final
judgment against the person named in the RICO lien notice or the defendant in the civil
proceeding or criminal proceeding in an amount equal to the fair market value of the property,
together with investigative costs and attorney fees incurred by the investigative agency in the
action. In the alternative, the court may order the forfeiture of any other property of the
defendant up to the value of the property subject to forfeiture. If a civil proceeding is pending,
such action shall be filed only in the court where the civil proceeding is pending.
(e) The state shall dispose of all forfeited property as soon as commercially feasible. If
property is not exercisable or transferable for value by the state, it shall expire. All forfeitures or
dispositions under this section shall be made with due provision for the rights of innocent
persons. The proceeds realized from such forfeiture and disposition shall be promptly distributed
in accordance with the provisions of s. 895.09.
(3) Property subject to forfeiture under this section may be seized by a law enforcement officer
upon court process. Seizure without process may be made if:
(a) The seizure is incident to a lawful arrest or search or an inspection under an administrative
inspection warrant.
162 of 256
(b) The property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state
in a forfeiture proceeding based upon this section.
(4) In the event of a seizure under subsection (3), a forfeiture proceeding shall be instituted
promptly. Property taken or detained under this section shall not be subject to replevin, but is
deemed to be in the custody of the law enforcement officer making the seizure, subject only to
the order of the court. When property is seized under this section, pending forfeiture and final
disposition, the law enforcement officer may:
(a) Place the property under seal.
(b) Remove the property to a place designated by court.
(c) Require another agency authorized by law to take custody of the property and remove it to
an appropriate location.
(5) The Department of Legal Affairs, any state attorney, or any state agency having jurisdiction
over conduct in violation of a provision of this act may institute civil proceedings under this
section. In any action brought under this section, the circuit court shall proceed as soon as
practicable to the hearing and determination. Pending final determination, the circuit court may
at any time enter such injunctions, prohibitions, or restraining orders, or take such actions,
including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as the court may deem proper.
(6) Any aggrieved person may institute a proceeding under subsection (1). In such proceeding,
relief shall be granted in conformity with the principles that govern the granting of injunctive
relief from threatened loss or damage in other civil cases, except that no showing of special or
irreparable damage to the person shall have to be made. Upon the execution of proper bond
against damages for an injunction improvidently granted and a showing of immediate danger of
significant loss or damage, a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction may be
issued in any such action before a final determination on the merits.
(7) The state, including any of its agencies, instrumentalities, subdivisions, or municipalities, if
it proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has been injured by reason of any violation of
the provisions of s. 895.03, shall have a cause of action for threefold the actual damages
sustained and shall also recover attorneys’ fees in the trial and appellate courts and costs of
investigation and litigation, reasonably incurred. In no event shall punitive damages be awarded.
The defendant shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs upon a
finding that the claimant raised a claim which was without substantial factual or legal support.
(a) Either party may demand a trial by jury in any civil action brought pursuant to this
subsection.
(b) Any prevailing plaintiff under this subsection or s. 772.104 shall have a right or claim to
forfeited property or to the proceeds derived therefrom superior to any right or claim the state has
in the same property or proceeds.
(8) A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the state in any criminal proceeding under
this act or any other criminal proceeding under state law shall estop the defendant in any
163 of 256
subsequent civil action or proceeding under this act or under s. 772.104 as to all matters as to
which such judgment or decree would be an estoppel as between the parties.
(9) The Department of Legal Affairs may bring an action for a violation of s. 895.03 to obtain
injunctive relief, civil penalties as provided in this subsection, attorney fees, and costs incurred in
the investigation and prosecution of any action under this chapter.
(a) A natural person who violates s. 895.03 is subject to a civil penalty of up to $100,000. Any
other person who violates s. 895.03 is subject to a civil penalty of up to $1 million. Moneys
recovered for civil penalties under this paragraph shall be deposited into the General Revenue
Fund.
(b) Moneys recovered by the Department of Legal Affairs for attorney fees and costs under this
subsection shall be deposited into the Legal Affairs Revolving Trust Fund, which may be used to
investigate and enforce this chapter.
(c) In a civil action brought under this subsection by the Department of Legal Affairs, any
party to such action may petition the court for entry of a consent decree or for approval of a
settlement agreement. The proposed decree or settlement shall specify the alleged violations, the
future obligations of the parties, the relief agreed upon, and the reasons for entering into the
consent decree or settlement agreement.
(10) The Department of Legal Affairs may, upon timely application, intervene in any civil
action or proceeding brought under subsection (6) or subsection (7) if it certifies that, in its
opinion, the action or proceeding is of general public importance. In such action or proceeding,
the state shall be entitled to the same relief as if the Department of Legal Affairs had instituted
the action or proceeding.
(11) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under
this chapter may be commenced at any time within 5 years after the conduct in violation of this
chapter terminates or the cause of action accrues. If a criminal prosecution or civil action or other
proceeding is brought, or intervened in, to punish, prevent, or restrain any violation of this
chapter, the running of the period of limitations prescribed by this section with respect to any
cause of action arising under subsection (6), subsection (7), or subsection (9) which is based in
whole or in part upon any matter complained of in any such prosecution, action, or proceeding
shall be suspended during the pendency of such prosecution, action, or proceeding and for 2
years following its termination.
(12) The application of one civil remedy under any provision of this chapter does not preclude
the application of any other remedy, civil or criminal, under this chapter or any other provision
of law. Civil remedies under this chapter are supplemental, and not mutually exclusive.
(13)(a) In addition to the authority to file a RICO lien notice set forth in s. 895.07(1), the
Department of Legal Affairs, the Office of Statewide Prosecution, or the office of a state attorney
may apply ex parte to a criminal division of a circuit court and, upon petition supported by sworn
affidavit, obtain an order authorizing the filing of a RICO lien notice against real property upon a
showing of probable cause to believe that the property was used in the course of, intended for use
164 of 256
in the course of, derived from, or realized through conduct in violation of ss. 895.01-895.05. If
the lien notice authorization is granted, the department shall, after filing the lien notice, forthwith
provide notice to the owner of the property by one of the following methods:
1. By serving the notice in the manner provided by law for the service of process.
2. By mailing the notice, postage prepaid, by certified mail to the person to be served at his or
her last known address and evidence of the delivery.
3. If neither of the foregoing can be accomplished, by posting the notice on the premises.
(b) The owner of the property may move the court to discharge the lien, and such motion shall
be set for hearing at the earliest possible time.
(c) The court shall discharge the lien if it finds that there is no probable cause to believe that
the property was used in the course of, intended for use in the course of, derived from, or
realized through conduct in violation of ss. 895.01-895.05 or if it finds that the owner of the
property neither knew nor reasonably should have known that the property was used in the
course of, intended for use in the course of, derived from, or realized through conduct in
violation of ss. 895.01-895.05.
(d) No testimony presented by the owner of the property at the hearing is admissible against
him or her in any criminal proceeding except in a criminal prosecution for perjury or false
statement, nor shall such testimony constitute a waiver of the owner’s constitutional right against
self-incrimination.
(e) A lien notice secured under this subsection is valid for a period of 90 days from the date the
court granted authorization, which period may be extended for an additional 90 days by the court
for good cause shown, unless a civil proceeding is instituted under this section and a lien notice
is filed under s. 895.07, in which event the term of the lien notice is governed by s. 895.08.
(f) The filing of a lien notice, whether or not subsequently discharged or otherwise lifted, shall
constitute notice to the owner and knowledge by the owner that the property was used in the
course of, intended for use in the course of, derived from, or realized through conduct in
violation of ss. 895.01-895.05, such that lack of such notice and knowledge shall not be a
defense in any subsequent civil or criminal proceeding under this chapter.
FACTS
674. Each of the companies, corporations, 501(c)(3) listed as defendants were used as
enterprises for the criminal activity of election fraud and an attempt at overthrowing the
U.S. and Florida governments, which is treason.
165 of 256
675. All defendants aided in crimes of election fraud, as listed in this case, in a
conspiratorial manner.
676. Each defendant used their respective enterprises to assist in election fraud to
disenfranchise voters.
677. Each defendant used their respective enterprises to assist in election fraud to
deprive Florida voters of their rights.
678. Each defendant used their respective enterprises to assist in election fraud to
deprive Scott and other candidates of their right to ballot access.
679. Each defendant used their respective enterprises to assist in election fraud to
overthrow both the U.S. Constitution.
680. Each defendant used their respective enterprises to assist in election fraud to FL
Constitution.
681. Each executive, official, government and country defendant neglected or violated
their duties to the company/corporation/enterprise to which they had a duty by knowing
of or should have known of the crimes their enterprise was either directly or indirectly
involved in relating to their companies involvement in the 2020 election fraud as a
weapon of choice to levy war against the U.S.
682. Due to illegality the corporate veil of each defendant entity has been pierced.
COUNT V – TREASON
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
166 of 256
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
876.32 Treason. — Treason against the state shall consist only in levying war against the same,
or in adhering to the enemies thereof, or giving them aid and comfort.
FACTS
683. The purpose of rigging the election was to overthrow the state and federal
government by way of installing traitors into elected offices, in Florida.
684. Each of the added parties, in their own unique way and with the power and/or
authority granted to them worked toward overthrowing the 2020 Election.
COUNT VI – DISENFRANCISEMENT OF VOTERS IN FLORIDA
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Right to vote is protected under several U.S. Constitutional Amendments and the Florida
Constitution.
FACTS
167 of 256
685. Every voter in Florida was disenfranchised.
686. No vote in Florida was counted.
687. Dominion machines were not secure from outside, nefarious interference.
688. ES&S machines were not secure from outside, nefarious interference.
689. ES&S machines used during the 2020 Election cycle, in Florida, have a built-in
modem.
690. ES&S machines used during the 2020 Election cycle, in Florida, have the ability
to connect to the internet.
691. ES&S machines attached to SQL Server software which can be rigged and altered
at a local level.
692. Dominion machines attached to SQL Server software which can be riffed and
altered at a local level.
693. Votes can be altered, switched and manipulated on local computers using SQL
Server software.
694. Dominion Voting Systems is a foreign company.
695. Dominion Voting Systems headquarters is in Canada.
696. During the 2020 U.S. Election cycle, three of Dominion Voting System’s board
members were Chinese
697. The three Dominion Voting Systems Chinese board members belong to the
Chinese Communist Party.
698. The Chinese Communist Party’s War Doctrine claims China is at war against the
United States of America.
699. China admits to being an enemy of the United States of America.
168 of 256
700. The Chinese Communist Party has absolute rule and access to any and every
Chinese company whether that company is on Chinese soil or located anywhere else in
the world.
701. Any and all Chinese-owned companies, whether fully-owned or partially-owned
by a Chinese national is actually owned by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and must
do the bidding of the CCP.
702. The penalty for a Chinese national to refuse to act on behalf of the CCP is
imprisonment or death.
703. The Chinese Communist Party is at war with the United States.
704. The Chinese Communist Party is an enemy of the United States.
705. Dominion is a subsidiary partially or fully-owned by a Chinese company.
706. Dominion was used to attack American sovereignty by way of rigging the U.S.
2020 Election Cycle.
707. Dominion intentionally caused foreign interference into U.S. 2020 Elections held,
in Florida.
708. ES&S intentionally caused foreign interference into U.S. 2020 Elections held, in
Florida.
709. The ES&S machines used, in Florida, during the 2020 Election cycle were not
approved for use by the Federal government.
710. The ES&S machines used, in Florida, during the 2020 Election cycle were not
approved for use by the Federal government because they were not secure.
711. Florida had no right to use voting machines that had not been approved by the
Federal government.
169 of 256
712. Florida had no right to use voting software that had not been approved by the
Federal government.
713. Florida had no right to use voting hardware that had not been approved by the
Federal government.
714. Secretary of State Laurel Lee was incompetent at performing her duties as an
election official in the 2020 Election cycle.
715. Secretary of State accepted $200K
716. China intentionally caused foreign interference into U.S. 2020 Elections held, in
Florida.
717. Canada allowed foreign interference into U.S. 2020 Elections held, in Florida.
718. A company based in Canada (Dominion) intentionally allowed foreign
interference into U.S. 2020 Elections held, in Florida.
719. Serbian hackers intentionally caused foreign interference into U.S. 2020 Elections
held, in Florida.
720. Foreign interference is illegal in U.S. elections.
721. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
722. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) for which
she and her staff aided China, Mark Zuckerberg, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Joe Biden,
Barack Obama, CTCL, Dominion Voting Systems, ES&S, Governor Ron DeSantis,
Secretary of State Laurel Lee and many others both named and not named in this suit, in
ensuring no votes were counted, during the 2020 Election cycle, in Palm Beach County.
170 of 256
723. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) for which
she and her staff aided China, Mark Zuckerberg, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Joe Biden,
Barack Obama, CTCL, Dominion Voting Systems, ES&S, Governor Ron DeSantis,
Secretary of State Laurel Lee and many others both named and not named in this suit, in
an effort to prevent a national effort to keep the 2020 Presidential incumbent Donald J.
Trump from being legally re-elected as the President of the United States of America.
724. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) for which
she and her staff aided China, Mark Zuckerberg, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Joe Biden,
Barack Obama, CTCL, Dominion Voting Systems, ES&S, Governor Ron DeSantis,
Secretary of State Laurel Lee and many others both named and not named in this suit, in
an effort to install candidates into offices that they had not legally won by the will of the
voters.
725. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) for which
she and her staff aided in ensuring a secure firewall was not in place during the 2020
Election cycle, in Palm Beach County.
726. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link accepted $6,808,977.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) for which
she and her staff aided in ensuring internet security systems had not been installed and/or
updated during the 2020 Election cycle, in Palm Beach County.
171 of 256
727. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link signed a contract with CTCL relating to the 2020 Election cycle.
728. The CTCL contract signed by Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach
County (PBC) Wendy Sartory Link stated how the money would and would not be spent.
729. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link surrendered her autonomous authority to CTCL when she agreed to operate the
2020 Election cycle by CTCL standards.
730. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link has no right or authority to transfer her autonomous power to any other person or
authority.
731. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link compromised the integrity of Palm Beach County’s 2020 Election cycle by
surrendering her authority to CTCL.
732. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link, her attorney Ashley Houlihan, and her staff have repeatedly refused to give public
records to Plaintiff Christine Scott citing fees must be paid which they know Scott cannot
afford due to her status as an indigent, yet the SOE of PBC and her staff refused to supply
Scott with hardship paperwork to ensure she received the public records in spite of her
inability to pay the fee. In such, Scott was deprived of her constitutional right to access
public records.
733. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link, her attorney Ashley Houlihan, and her staff have denied Scott’s Constitutional
172 of 256
rights to public records access to hide the Supervisor’s disenfranchisement of Palm Beach
County voters.
734. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory
Link, her attorney Ashley Houlihan, and her staff have denied Scott’s Constitutional
rights to public records access to conceal evidence in this instant case.
735. By concealing evidence in this instant case, Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for
Palm Beach County (PBC) Wendy Sartory Link, her attorney Ashley Houlihan, and her
staff have tampered with evidence to hide their illegal activities of disenfranchisement of
Palm Beach County voters.
736. Then Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Broward County (BC) Peter Antonacci
accepted either $400,000.00 or $1,424,971.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life
(CTCL).
737. During a Florida House of Representatives Public Integrity and Elections
Committee meeting, then-BC SOE, Peter Antonacci, claimed he had accepted
$400,000.00 from CTCL.
738. The FGA Research Brief claims Broward County Supervisor of Elections Peter
Antonacci accepted $1,424,971.00 from CTCL, citing National Public Radio as its
source. (https://thefga.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Florida-
Zuckerbucks_2020_election.pdf)
739. CTCL is a front organization posing as a non-partisan 501(c)(3) for Mark
Zuckerberg.
173 of 256
740. One of CTCL’s goals was to ensure incumbent to the Office of the President of
the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, would not win the 2020 General
Election, at any cost.
741. Another one of CTCL’s goals was to install their preferred candidates into key
positions to ensure certain votes would be carried and certain agendas followed no matter
the will of the voter.
742. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to
disenfranchise Florida voters.
743. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to put people in
positions that would vote for mask mandates in counties, cities and schools.
744. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to install
candidates in office who would vote to force vaccines on citizens.
745. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to violate the
U.S. Constitution.
746. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to overthrow the
government of Florida.
747. In part, CTCL’s purpose in interfering with Florida elections was to overthrow the
government of the United States, in part, by ensuring the vote in Florida was rigged.
748. CTCL acted treasonously against voters of Florida by disenfranchising the voters
in an attempt to overthrow the government.
749. CTCL acted as a weapon of choice by Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan, Peter
Thiel, Mark Andreessen and others.
174 of 256
750. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) is a charity owned and founded by Mark
Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan.
751. Mark Zuckerberg and his first-generation wife of Chinese descent, Priscilla Chan,
directly gave CTCL $350M, which was used in part to disenfranchise voters, in Florida.
752. Mark Zuckerberg and his first-generation wife of Chinese descent, Priscilla Chan,
indirectly gave CTCL an additional $69.5M, which was used in part to disenfranchise
voters, in Florida.
753. Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of Facebook.
754. Facebook was used as a tool to suppress speech relating to election fraud during
the 2020 Election Cycle, which in turn concealed the disenfranchisement of Florida
voters.
755. Facebook was used as a tool to suppress speech relating to COVID-19 originating
in a lab in Wuhan, China, which in turn suppressed the connection between fear of
catching the virus, leaving one’s house, voting-by-mail and the rampant known fraud that
has historically taken place with mail-in ballots as the culprit. This suppression
disenfranchised voters because it hid the true dangers of voting-by-mail which in turn
suppressed important information voters needed to make informed voting choices - which
way they would choose to vote - by mail, early voting or election day voting.
756. Scott has been denied access to public records which she has requested of the
Broward County Supervisor of Elections even though it is a constitutional right to access
public records and even though she has filed and submitted ‘Undue Burden’ paperwork
and was willing to submit additional hardship paperwork, if needed.
175 of 256
757. The SOE of BC has used Scott’s indigency status as a way to conceal election
documents related to the 2020 Election cycle.
758. Broward County Supervisor of Elections counsel requested from this court and
this judge (Judge Smith) the destruction of images of ballots from the 2020 Election
cycle.
759. The images have the ability to be used as proof in a forensic audit.
760. Broward County attorneys attempted to destroy evidence relating to the 2020
Election cycle.
761. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Miami-Dade County (MDC) Christina White
accepted $2,482,440.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
762. The funds received by MDC from CTCL were given to MDC by CTCL mainly by
way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise Miami-Dade
County voters.
763. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Leon County (LC) Mark S. Earley accepted
$1,437,386.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
764. The funds received by LC from CTCL were given to LC by CTCL mainly by way
of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise Leon County voters.
765. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Hernando County (HC) Shirley Anderson
accepted $111,824.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
766. The funds received by HC from CTCL were given to HC by CTCL mainly by
way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise Hernando County
voters.
176 of 256
767. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Osceola County (OC) Mary Jane Arrington
accepted $109,404.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
768. The funds received by OC from CTCL were given to OC by CTCL mainly by
way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise Osceola County
voters.
769. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Brevard County Lori Scott accepted
$850,808.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
770. The funds received by Brevard County SOE from CTCL were given to Brevard
County SOE by CTCL mainly by way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to
disenfranchise Brevard County voters.
771. Then-Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Hillsborough County (HBC) Craig
Latimer accepted $2,932,375.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
772. The funds received by HBC SOE from CTCL were given to HBC SOE by CTCL
mainly by way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise
Hillsborough County voters.
773. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Alachua County (AC) Kim A. Barton accepted
$707,606.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
774. The funds received by AC SOE from CTCL were given to AC SOE by CTCL
mainly by way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise
Alachua County voters.
775. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Wakulla County (WC) Joe Morgan accepted
$69,564.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
177 of 256
776. The funds received by WC SOE from CTCL were given to WC SOE by CTCL
mainly by way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise
Wakulla County voters.
777. Supervisor of Elections (SOE) for Lake County (LC) Alan Hays accepted
$195,900.00 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).
778. The funds received by LC SOE from CTCL were given to LC SOE by CTCL
mainly by way of CZI on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg to be used to disenfranchise Lake
County voters.
779. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle.
780. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle to
disenfranchise Florida voters.
781. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle to steal the
vote from Florida voters.
782. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle to steal the
liberties of Floridians and American citizens.
783. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle as part of a
larger scheme of levying war against American citizens.
784. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle to rig the
election.
785. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle to rig the
election to install their preferred candidates into state and local positions as a way to
force mask mandates on counties, cities and schools.
178 of 256
786. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle in an attempt
to force vaccines on Floridians.
787. CTCL poured more than $17M into the Florida 2020 Election cycle in an attempt
to force vaccine passports.
788. CTCL acted as a puppet for Mark Zuckerberg.
789. SOEs who accepted and used the CTCL money acted as a puppet for CTCL and
Mark Zuckerberg.
790. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link admitted she took the (CTCL) money from Mark
Zuckerberg.
791. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link admitted she had to get CTCL’s permission before
doing something with the money.
792. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link admitted to being CTCL’s puppet.
793. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link admitted to being Mark Zuckerberg’s puppet by
way of admitting she needed CTCL’s permission to do something with the CTCL money
because she admitted she had accepted $6.8M from Mark Zuckerberg, which means she
believed she was actually getting permission by Mark Zuckerberg as to how she would
conduct Palm Beach County’s 2020 election.
794. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link did not conduct the 2020 Election cycle
autonomously.
795. PBCSOE Wendy Sartory Link violated her oath by disenfranchising voters which
violates the Constitutional right of each voter to have their vote counted.
COUNT VII – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.041 – FRAUD IN CONNECTION WITH
CASTING VOTE
179 of 256
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.041
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- Fraud: Intentional deception resulting in injury to another.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Any person perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate or aid in the perpetration of any fraud in
connection with any vote cast, to be cast, or attempted to be cast, is guilty of a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
FACTS
796. Each defendant, as described herein, has perpetrated, attempted to perpetrate or
aided in the perpetration of fraud in connection with votes cast, to be cast and/or
attempted to be cast.
COUNT VIII – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.045 – VOTE SELLING
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
- Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.045
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
180 of 256
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.0
-
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Any person who:
(1) Corruptly offers to vote for or against, or to refrain from voting for or against, any
candidate in any election in return for pecuniary or other benefit; or
(2) Accepts a pecuniary or other benefit in exchange for a promise to vote for or against,
or to refrain from voting for or against, any candidate in any election,
is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.
FACTS
797. Each defendant either directly or through their leadership and/or administrative
role has corruptly sold the votes of all Floridians through aiding in election fraud.
798. Those defendants who promoted coronavirus hysteria while suppressing healthy,
holistic and natural remedies, cures and solutions were using fear tactics to scare people
into staying in their homes and voting by mail instead of going to the polling stations, as
a strategy to increase mail in ballots because they are easy to change and manipulate
without a paper trail.
799. Both parties have raised concerns over vote by mail manipulation over the years.
800. The 2020 Election fraud, in Florida, was a non-partisan attack.
181 of 256
COUNT IX – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.051 – VIOLATIONS; NEGLECT OF DUTY;
CORRUPT PRACTICES
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.051
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent
jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case.
(2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- Misdemeanor: Usually a petty offense, a less serious crime than a felony, punishable by
less than a year of confinement.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be
excluded from the polls. Any election official who is excluded shall be replaced as provided in
this code.
(2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as
prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently
or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 775.084.
(4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or
interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(5) Any supervisor who willfully violates any provision of the Florida Election Code is, upon a
finding of such violation by a court of competent jurisdiction, prohibited from receiving the
special qualification salary pursuant to s. 145.09(3) for a period of 24 months, dating from the
time of the violation.
182 of 256
FACTS
801. Each official defendant willfully violated the election code as described herein.
COUNT X – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.061 – CORRUPTLY INFLUENCING VOTING
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.061
- Conviction: A judgement of guilt against a criminal defendant.
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
Governor Ron DeSantis, Secretary of State Laurel Lee, Eleven defendant Florida Supervisors of
Elections, CTCL, other listed defendant 501(c)(3)s, CZI, Mark Zuckerberg and All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) Whoever by bribery, menace, threat, or other corruption whatsoever, either directly or
indirectly, attempts to influence, deceive, or deter any elector in voting or interferes with him or
her in the free exercise of the elector’s right to vote at any election commits a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 for the first conviction,
and a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084, for any subsequent conviction.
(2) No person shall directly or indirectly give or promise anything of value to another intending
thereby to buy that person’s or another’s vote or to corruptly influence that person or another in
casting his or her vote. Any person who violates this subsection is guilty of a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. However, this subsection
shall not apply to the serving of food to be consumed at a political rally or meeting or to any item
of nominal value which is used as a political advertisement, including a campaign message
designed to be worn by a person.
183 of 256
FACTS
802. Governor Ron DeSantis gave Wendy Sartory Link the appointed position of Palm
Beach County Supervisor of Elections to corruptly influence people’s votes.
803. Governor Ron DeSantis gave Peter Antonacci the appointed position of Broward
County Supervisor of Elections to corruptly influence people’s votes.
804. For rigging the 2020 Florida election cycle Governor Ron DeSantis appointed
Peter Antonacci to the position of Head Chief Administrative Judge.
805. CTCL bribed 11 defendant supervisors of elections to corruptly influence voters.
806. CZI and other listed 501(c)(3) listed defendants corruptly gave CTCL money to
corruptly influence votes cast.
807. Mark Zuckerberg corruptly funneled money through CZI and CTCL to the
Secretary of State and eleven Florida supervisors of elections to corruptly influence votes
cast.
808. Each defendant has directly or indirectly violated this statute as described herein.
COUNT XI – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.051 – VIOLATIONS; NEGLECT OF DUTY;
CORRUPT PRACTICES
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.051
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent
jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case.
(2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
184 of 256
- Misdemeanor: Usually a petty offense, a less serious crime than a felony, punishable by
less than a year of confinement.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be
excluded from the polls. Any election official who is excluded shall be replaced as provided in
this code.
(2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as
prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently
or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 775.084.
(4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or
interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(5) Any supervisor who willfully violates any provision of the Florida Election Code is, upon a
finding of such violation by a court of competent jurisdiction, prohibited from receiving the
special qualification salary pursuant to s. 145.09(3) for a period of 24 months, dating from the
time of the violation.
FACTS
809. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link and her staff
and/or deputies violated Fla. Stat. 98.098(2)(1) 1000s to 10s of 1000s of times during the
2020 Election cycle.
810. Each government public servant defendant has as described herein has willfully
refused or willfully neglected to perform his or her duties as prescribed and related to the
Florida Election code.
185 of 256
811. Each of the added officials named as defendants performed his or her duties
fraudulently and corruptly as described herein.
COUNT XII – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.0515 – VOTING RIGHTS; DEPRIVATION
OF, OR INTERFERENCE WITH, PROHIBITED; PENALTY
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.0515
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
- political subdivision: include counties, cities, towns, villages, special tax school districts,
special road and bridge districts, bridge districts, and all other districts in this state. See
Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) All citizens of this state who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the
people in this state or in any district, county, city, town, municipality, school district, or other
subdivision of this state shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections without
distinction according to race, color, or previous condition of servitude, notwithstanding any law,
ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage to the contrary.
(2) No person acting under color of law shall:
(a) In determining whether any individual is qualified under law to vote in any election, apply
any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied
under law to other individuals within the same political subdivision who have been found to be
qualified to vote; or
186 of 256
(b) Deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on
any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if
such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under
law to vote in such election. This paragraph shall apply to vote-by-mail ballots only if there is a
pattern or history of discrimination on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude
in regard to vote-by-mail ballots.
(3) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or
coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of
interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or
for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any
office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of
selecting or electing any such candidate.
(4) No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, and no standard, practice, or procedure,
shall be imposed or applied by any political subdivision of this state to deny or abridge the right
of any citizen to vote on account of race or color.
(5) Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
FACTS
812. Each of the defendants, in various different ways depending on the person or
entity, has violated this statute either directly or indirect (which would be aiding) and in
such harmed Scott, the voters of Florida and the voters of the United States.
813. This attack against voting rights, deprivation of and/or interference with the right
to vote was and is a non-partisan attack. It is a levying of war against the State of Florida,
the voters of Florida, the citizens of Florida, Plaintiff Christine Scott and the citizens of
the United States.
COUNT XIII – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.0615 – VOTER INTIMIDATION OR
SUPPRESSION PROHIBITED; CRIMINAL PENALTIES
187 of 256
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.0615
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) This section may be cited as the “Voter Protection Act.”
(2) A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten to use force, violence, or
intimidation or any tactic of coercion or intimidation to induce or compel an individual to:
(a) Vote or refrain from voting;
(b) Vote or refrain from voting for any particular individual or ballot measure;
(c) Refrain from registering to vote; or
(d) Refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher.
(3) A person may not knowingly use false information to:
(a) Challenge an individual’s right to vote;
(b) Induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from voting or registering to vote; or
(c) Induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from acting as a legally authorized
election official or poll watcher.
(4) A person may not knowingly destroy, mutilate, or deface a voter registration form or
election ballot or obstruct or delay the delivery of a voter registration form or election ballot.
(5) A person who violates subsection (2), subsection (3), or subsection (4) commits a felony of
the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
188 of 256
FACTS
814. Each defendant, in a variety of ways as specifically stated within this document
violated this statute to the detriment of Florida voters casting doubt as to whether the
2020 election results express the will of the voters.
COUNT XIV– FLORIDA STATUTES 104.11 – NEGLECT OF DUTY BY SHERIFF OR
OTHER OFFICER
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.11
- Misdemeanor: Usually a petty offense, a less serious crime than a felony, punishable by
less than a year of confinement.
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform
his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
FACTS
815. There were 27 different occasions on 25 separate days when deputy sheriffs or
other officers willfully neglected or refused to perform their constitution duty to which
they took an oath (Fla. Stat. 876.05). See Scott’s federal case for a list of law enforcement
who refused to perform their constitutional duties by allowing Scott to petition at
189 of 256
properties that are open to the public but instead forced her off the properties under threat
of arrest and often by way of trespassing her from the property.
COUNT XV – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.22 – STEALING AND DESTROYING
RECORDS, ETC., OF ELECTION
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.22
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
All Parties
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Any person who is guilty of stealing, willfully and wrongfully breaking, destroying, mutilating,
defacing, or unlawfully moving or securing and detaining the whole or any part of any ballot box
or any record tally sheet or copy thereof, returns, or any other paper or document provided for, or
who fraudulently makes any entry or alteration therein except as provided by law, or who
permits any other person so to do, is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided
in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
FACTS
816. The Central Intelligence Agency aided in the stealing of and destroying of U.S.
2020 election records, by foreign governments and entities including but not limited to
China, Pakistan, Serbia, Saudia Arabia, Canada, UBS Securities, Dominion, WIX in an
190 of 256
attempt to use the 2020 U.S. Election cycle to overthrow the U.S. and Florida
government. The CIA’s entire purpose is to protect U.S. citizens from foreign enemies.
To say the CIA has failed miserably is so obvious it is like stating the witch in Snow
White and the Seven Dwarfs has a wart on the end of her nose. The CIA was complicit in
this coup against the U.S. and the State of Florida to such a degree that it absolutely must
be dissolved because the only explanation is that the CIA has become an enemy of the
United States and Florida. Brennan and all top-ranking CIA directors are responsible for
the CIA’s failure to protect the United States during the 2020 Election cycle to the degree
that they must be held liable for treason against the United States and the State of Florida.
817. The FBI aided in the stealing, destroying, unlawfully moving and/or securing and
detaining the whole or parts of record tallies which were intercepted by China, Pakistan
and other rogue countries attempting a coup against the People of the United States and
the State of Florida. Comey and other top-level management at the FBI are personally
responsible for their actions and the actions of the agency that led to this attack against
the American People and the voters of Florida. The FBI aided in the stealing and/or
destroying of record tallies and other documents fand for the fraudulent actions of entry
or alteration.
818. Dominion, ES&S, AWS, Microsoft, Google, their parent companies and largest
shareholders all aiding in the stealing and/or destroying of record tallies and other
documents and for the fraudulent actions of entry or alteration.
819. Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Comey, Brennan, Milley, Schumer,
McConnell, Gates, Soros, and Fauci all played a pivotal role within the elected, appointed
government positions or their positions within their respective non-governmental
191 of 256
agencies whether non-profit or for profit in the stealing, destroying, unlawfully moving
and/or securing and detaining the whole or parts of the record tallies and other documents
and for the fraudulent actions of entry or alteration.
820. Each defendant, in a variety of ways specifically listed throughout this document,
has aided in the violation of this statute and of the Florida Election code.
821. The CIA has specifically worked with Pakistan, Google, China and others to rig
the 2020 Election cycle, in Florida, and the United States with the ultimate goal of a U.S.
takeover. The CIA must be dissolved. It serves no purpose, has no value to the citizens of
the United States or of the State of Florida and instead has become the enemy of the state
with goal of joining forces with enemies of the state to overthrow the U.S. government
and the State of Florida.
COUNT XVI – FLORIDA STATUTES 104.30 – VOTING SYSTEM; UNLAWFUL
POSSESSION; TAMPERING
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of this pleading,
exhibits, Judicial Notice and other filings related to this Contest of Elections statement as if set
forth herein in full.
Terms Used In Florida Statutes 104.30
- Felony: A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.
- Misdemeanor: Usually a petty offense, a less serious crime than a felony, punishable by
less than a year of confinement.
- person: includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships,
estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups
or combinations. See Florida Statutes 1.01
PARTIES
All Parties
192 of 256
STANDARD OF REVIEW
(1) Any unauthorized person who unlawfully has possession of any voting system,
components, or key thereof is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided
in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(2) Any person who tampers or attempts to tamper with or destroy any voting system or
equipment with the intention of interfering with the election process or the results thereof is
guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.
FACTS
822. With knowing or should have known that Dominion and the specifically used
ES&E were not federally approved for use in Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis, SOS Lee,
Maria Matthews, Ashley Davis, Nathaniel Klitzberg, Colleen O’Brien, Adam Katzman,
Ashley Houlihan, the added defendant supervisors of elections and their named staff
knew or should have known that the voting systems were vulnerable to being tampered
with to the degree that their silence regarding this risk demonstrates aiding in the
interference with the 2020 Election process and the results.
823. The PBC poll workers who walked off with the PBC SOE cartridges either knew
or should have known that such an action was tampering with the voting system and
destroying the chain of custody, which has inevitably given reason to doubt the 2020
Election cycle in Palm Beach County expressed the will of the voters.
824. Dominion and ES&S and their complicitly responsible parent companies and
ownership, directly and/or indirectly tampered with voting systems or equipment with the
intention of interfering with the 2020 Election process and the results.
825. Microsoft and its large shareholder Blackrock either knew or should have known
that its product SQL Servers had the ability to alter, manipulate, destroy and change votes
193 of 256
in voting machines, components and or systems just as a cigarette company knows that
tobacco causes cancer. Owners and shareholders are responsible for the actions of their
enterprises and in such had a responsibility to know, warn of and address their respective
entities risk and threat of putting the of interfering with the election process and/or the
results thereof.
826. The Federal Bureau of Investigations’ entire job is to keep U.S. citizens safe and
protected, including those that reside in Florida. Scott had contacted the FBI and
informed it of several election fraud issues that were occurring in the State of Florida. By
proof of lack of action, the FBI refused to address the matter which proves the FBI was
complicit an/or a willing and knowing participant in the election fraud that occurred in
relation to the voting systems and/or equipment with the intention of interfering with the
election process and/or results. In fact, the FBI was so involved that Comey sold the
highly classified Hammer and Scorecard
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQa17Qyc0Fo ;
https://theamericanreport.org/2019/11/10/the-hammer-is-the-key-to-the-coup/)
WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that this court set aside the 2020 General Election results
in the State of Florida and holding the election anew, or in the alternative, setting aside the Palm
Beach County and Broward County 2020 elections and holding them anew, or in the alternative
setting aside the Palm Beach County 2020 election cycle and holding it anew, or in the
alternative setting aside the 2020 election for US House of Representatives in District 22 and
holding it anew manually, with Scott’s name on the ballot. For the sake of convenience if only
the 2020 US House Seat for District 22 is to set aside and held anew, Scott suggests adding
194 of 256
Scott’s name to the ballot as a ‘No Party Affiliate’ rather than a Republican since James Pruden
is already running on the General Election Republican Ticket. Precedent has been set, in 2020, in
a Broward Circuit Court to remove a Republican from the party and place that candidate on the
ballot as a No Party Affiliate. Although Scott’s circumstances might be different, the achieved
goal would be similar as to the previous Broward Circuit Court ruling. In the alternative, Scott
requests that this court set aside the results of the District 22 US House Representative Primary
Election and re-hold the election with Scott’s name on it to ensure all eligible candidates have
the opportunity to run and that District 22 voters are not disenfranchised. That all ballots be hand
counted without the use of software and that the process remain entirely offline. That for every
Democrat elections employee or poll watcher there is a Republican elections employee or poll
watcher – one-for-one. Hold the election on the one date given. Never let the ballot go
unwatched by at least ten people from each party, non-stop twenty-four seven until all ballots are
counted, in shifts. Have cameras everywhere, positioned at every single table counting ballots.
Make sure the camera can read every single ballot. Keep the cameras off-line by buying cameras
that do not have the ability to connect to wifi, that way they can’t be hacked and nefariously
turned on by an outside source. Or, in the alternative, address the matter a way this court deems
reasonable. Scott requests that this court dissolve each of the non-government entities, seize their
assets and trespass (exile) them and their executives from the State of Florida. Scott requests that
each government defendant be removed from their duties, fired and never allowed to work for
the government or any company that contracts with the government again. Scott and the voters of
Florida have been willfully, purposefully and intentionally harmed by the direct and indirect
actions of defendants maliciously and in bad faith which has deprived Scott and the voters of
Florida of their rights and in such seeks $17T in damages.
195 of 256
Dated August 27, 2020
/s/ Christine Scott
Christine Scott
212 E Hillsboro Blvd, #212
Deerfield Beach, FL 33441
786-566-9434
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on August 27, 2020, the above document was served by email to:
Office of Governor Ron DeSantis State of Florida The Capitol
400 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001
(850) 717-933
James Uthmeier
Executive Office of the Governor 400 S Monroe St Tallahassee, FL 32399-6536
Office: 850-488-7146
Email: [email protected]
Celia Terenzio
Ofc of the Atty General 1515 N Flagler Dr
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-3428
Office: 561-837-5016
Fax: 561-837-5099
Email: [email protected]
Adam Katzman
Office of the Broward County Attorney 115 S Andrews Ave Ste 423 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1826
Office: 954-357-7600
Cell: 954-357-7600 - No Text Messages
Email: [email protected]
196 of 256
Nathaniel Klitsberg
Broward County Attorney's Office
115 S Andrews Ave Ste 423 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1826
Office: 954-357-7600
Email: [email protected]
Ashley Davis
Florida Department of State R.A. Gray Building 500 S Bronough St Ste 100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-6519
Office: 850-245-6531
Cell: 850-414-3887
Colleen O’Brien
Florida Department of State R.A. Gray Building
500 S Bronough St Ste 100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-6519
Office: 850-245-6519 [email protected]
Ashley Houlihan
Supervisor of Elections, Palm Beach Cty 240 S Military Trl West Palm Beach, FL 33415-3148
Office: 561-656-6200 [email protected]
Laurel Lee
Florida Department of State
R.A. Gray Building 500 S Bronough St Tallahassee, FL 32399-6519
Office: 850-245-6500
Wendy Link
Supervisor of Elections, Palm Beach Cty 240 S Military Trl
West Palm Beach, FL 33415-3148
197 of 256
Maria Matthews
Florida Department of State R.A. Gray Building
500 S Bronough St Ste 100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-6519
Peter Antonacci
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
115 S Andrews Ave Ste 423 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1826
Ginger Barry Boyd
Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel
215 S Monroe St Ste 400
Tallahassee, FL 32301-1804
Office: 850-681-6810
Broward County Clerk of the Court
201 SE 6th Street
Fort Lauderdale
Florida, US 33301
Phone: (954) 831-6565
Fourth District Clerk of the Court
110 South Tamarind Ave.
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
(561) 242-2000
198 of 256
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1 – Emails between Scott and Amanda Romant, Asst. To Pres. State Senate, Bill
Galvano, dated April 23-35, 2020
199 of 256
200 of 256
201 of 256
202 of 256
203 of 256
204 of 256
Exhibit 2 – Email to John Way, Director of Candidate and Election Services for Broward
County Supervisor of Elections, from Candidate Christine Scott Regarding No Accurate
District 22 Map Exists Anywhere, Faulty Voter Software Relating to District Mapping and
Precincts, and Invalid Petitions, dated April 24, 2020
205 of 256
206 of 256
Exhibit 3 – Email from Candidate Scott to Secretary of State Laurel Lee Regarding 700+
Fraudulently Rejected Petitions, dated June 17, 2020 – Enough Valid Petitions to Place
Scott on the Ballot
207 of 256
208 of 256
209 of 256
Exhibit 4 – Email to Governor DeSantis Regarding COVID-19 Concerns Followed By A
Game of Hot Potato
210 of 256
211 of 256
Exhibit 5 – Email to Secretary Lee Regarding COVID-19 Concerns
212 of 256
Exhibit 6 – Email from Klitsberg to Scott and Her Response
213 of 256
214 of 256
215 of 256
216 of 256
217 of 256
218 of 256
219 of 256
220 of 256
Exhibit 7 – Emails between Antonacci and Scott
221 of 256
222 of 256
223 of 256
224 of 256
225 of 256
226 of 256
Exhibit 8 – Emails from Scott to Maria Matthews, Director of Elections for Division of
Elections
227 of 256
Exhibit 9 – Servers Located Outside the US used by Palm Beach County Supervisor or
Elections
228 of 256
Exhibit 10 – Google blacklisted Conservative, Right-leaning, Republican, Patriot sites
229 of 256
Exhibit 11 – Notice: MEDIA ADVISORY: Certification of 2020 Presidential Preference
Primary Election Results
https://dos.myflorida.com/communications/press-releases/2020/media-advisory-certification-of-2020-
presidential-preference-primary-election-results/
Exhibit 12 – No Posted Primary Election Certification of Palm Beach County Supervisor of
Elections Race Because the PBC SOE Wendy Sartory Link signed the Certification and
was a Candidate in the Race which Made her ineligible to sign the Certification and made
the Primary PBC Certification fraudulent and void. Compare the PBC Primary
Certification against the PBC General Election Certification Webpages – the Primary
Certification is not posted because it does is void, hence the PBC Primary Election was
never legally certified. This is not an acknowledgement that the PBC General Election
Canvassing Board Certification was valid. Instead, it is merely acknowledgement that even
230 of 256
by PBC SOE’s low standards, the PBC Primary Election was not legally certified. NO
OFFICIAL RESULTS POSTED FOR THE 2020 PRIMARY ELECTION. As a point of
reference, previously on the 2020 Primary Election page the ‘Office Results’ had included
the ‘unofficial early voting totals by day’ and the ‘voting system post-election audit report’
both of which have since been removed from the site leading one to presume the results are
not and never were valid records and that since the PBCSOE has not reported this fact she
is attempting to hide and conceal it to misrepresent the facts to the public. This also means
that the ‘(Website last updated at: 9/17/2020...’) is also false and meant to mislead the
public.
231 of 256
Exhibit 13 – Correspondence Regarding Valid Petitions that had been Erroneously
Rejected Preventing Scott From Ballot Access
232 of 256
233 of 256
234 of 256
235 of 256
236 of 256
237 of 256
238 of 256
239 of 256
It is important to acknowledge that, as time went on, Scott uncovered more and more valid petitions
that had been rejected. The reason Scott did not initially wait until she had gone through all the rejected
ballots was twofold; 1) she was under a time constraint to have her name properly added to the ballot
before she the ballots were printed; 2) she only needed a certain number of valid petitions to gain ballot
access, so beyond that number, plus a buffer, it was all gravy. Therefore, she began addressing it with
the SOEs and DOE as soon as she was positive she had enough valid petition – and that valid petitions
were just being fraudulently rejected – and she just added the newly found valid petitions to the overall
count in her communications overtime to keep the tally updated and accurate.
240 of 256
241 of 256
242 of 256
243 of 256
Exhibit 14 – Graphic of Palm Beach County Votes Not Counted and Division of Elections
Votes Not Counted
244 of 256
Exhibit 15 – Violations of Statute 98.0981(2)(a) Creates Enough Fraud in Palm Beach
County to Create Reasonable Doubt the Election Expressed the Will of Votes
245 of 256
246 of 256
247 of 256
Exhibit 16 – Algorithm Weighting Presidential Vote Throughout Florida Void Election –
Fraud Vitiates Everything – Impossible Identical Ratio in All 67 Counties of 0.93359375
248 of 256
Exhibit 17 – The internal Broward County software that originates and shares data with
the Division of Elections/Secretary of State/Department of State of Florida, in Tallahassee
gives false results and in such cannot be trusted or relied upon to express the will of the
voters. Each of Scott’s Petitions Represented Below was Erroneously Rejected as Wrong
District. Scott Ran for Congressional District 22, US House of Representatives. All of
Deerfield Beach, Margate, Coral Springs and Coconut Creek are in District 22, so it is not
possible for any petitions from those districts to be in the ‘Wrong District’. It proves the
software is rejecting valid petitions, which means the software cannot be trust with voter’s
data during the election cycle, as well.
249 of 256
Exhibit 18 – 11 Florida Counties Not Following Federal Guidelines
250 of 256
Exhibit 19 – HAVA and Florida state funds received for FL Elections in 2018 and 2020
Exhibit 20 – DOS official raw data showing no breakdown of votes or party affiliation votes
251 of 256
Exhibit 21 – Pics of Broward County ES&S Voting Machines Able to Connect to Internet
252 of 256
253 of 256
254 of 256
Exhibit 22 – Mary Fanning’s visual showing of how 2020 Election results were Intercepted
by China, the Switched Out with Different Results before being Forwarded to Washington
– The Brown Dot is Tallahassee.
255 of 256
256 of 256