fin 685: risk management larry schrenk, instructor
Post on 15-Jan-2016
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
FIN 685: Risk Management
Larry Schrenk, Instructor
TOPICS
Course Details What is Risk? What is Risk Management? Introduction to VaR Sources of Market Risk
Course Details
MECHANICS
Course Pages– http://auapps.american.edu/~
schrenk/FIN685/FIN685.htm
Class– Lecture 5:30 PM to 8:00 PM– Review/Excel and Office Hours 8:00
PM+
Exams 3; Excel Projects 1; Case 1
PREREQUISITES
MSF, not MBA, Course Statistics Finance– Derivatives
Mathematics Economics Accounting
BOOK
Philippe Jorion, Financial Risk Manager Handbook (FRMH)
SCHEDULEPART I: RISK IN GENERAL
1. What is Risk? How Do We Measure It? FRMH 10, 11 2. How Do We Deal with Risk? Why Should We Care? FRMH 12, 13
PART II: DEALING WITH RISK3. Dependencies TBA4. The World of Monte Carlo–Simulation, not Gambling FRMH 4
5. The Hot Techniques: Value at Risk (VaR), etc. FRMH 14, 15Exam 1 (through Topic 4)
PART III: SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS6. Credit Risk I FRMH 18, 19
7. Credit Risk II FRMH 20, 21 8. Credit Risk III FRMH 22, 23 9. Operational Risk FRMH 24
Exam 2 (through Topic 8) 10. Liquidity Risk FRMH 25
11. Managing Risk across the Firm FRMH 16, 26 12. Our Friends in Basel FRMH 29, 30
Exam 3 (through Topic 12); Case and Projects Due
REVIEW/EXCEL SCHEDULE1. Probability Measures FRMH 22. Linear Regression FRMH 33. Time Value of Money and Bonds FRMH 14. Stocks, FX, Commodities FRMH 95. Exam 1, No Review6. Derivatives: Introduction FRMH 57. Derivatives: Black-Scholes FRMH 68. Derivatives: Binomial Model FRMH 69. Exam 2, No Review 10. Fixed-Income FRMH 711. Fixed-Income Derivatives FRMH 812. Exam 3, No Review
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Global Association of Risk
Professionals (GARP)– Financial Risk Manager Certificate
Professional Risk Managers’ International Association (PRMIA)– Professional Risk Manager Certificat
e
What is Risk?
RISK VERSUS UNCERTAINTY
• Uncertainty: Ignorance– I have no idea what a box may contain.
• Risk: ‘Distributional’ Knowledge– I may not know which color I will get, but I
know that the probability is 50-50 for each color.
– Risk Rational Expectation
RISK DEFINITION
Risk is…– The possibility that the actual (or
realized) result may deviate from the expected result.
Financial Risk is (often)…– The possibility that the actual (or
realized) return may deviate from the expected return.
RISK DEFINITION
Different Risks; Different Possibilities
Greater/Lesser Risk; Greater/Lesser Deviation
Upside and Downside Risk
RISK ANALYSIS
Stages of Risk Analysis
1. Identify Exposure
2. Measure Amount
3. Price
STEP 1–IDENTIFY RISK
• Identify risk exposure– Profit of a firm
• Input price changes• Labor problems• Shifts in consumer tastes
– Bond• Interest rate risk• Default risk
– Foreign investment• Exchange rate risk
• Result: Asset exposed to risks X, Y, etc.
STEP 2–MEASURE RISK
• Measure/quantify the risk– ‘Cardinal Ordering’– Use of statistics– Historical volatility/standard deviation– Correct measure of specific risks
• Result: Asset exposure to risk X is 8 units.
STEP 3–PRICE RISK
• Price the Risk– Compensation for specific level of risk.– Return, not dollar, compensation– Higher risk higher return
• Result: Asset exposure to 8 units of X risk yields a risk premium of 10%.
Recall: Risk premium = E[r] – rf
OVER-SIMPLIFIED EXAMPLE
1. Risk Exposure: Return Volatility
2. Risk Measure: Standard Deviation
3. Risk Price: 1% risk premium per 2% Standard Deviation
• Alternate: CAPM
THE QUANTIFICATION OF RISK• Past Data– Historical prices – Forward-looking data– Assumption: Future behaves like
past
• Statistical Distribution– Distribution, –Mean, – Variance, etc.
QUANTIFICATION EXAMPLE
• Historical Data:– Normally distributed, m = 10%, s = 20%
• Forecast– E[r] = 10%– Confidence intervals, standard error, etc.
-84%-71%-59%-46%-34%-21% -9% 3% 16% 28% 41% 53% 65% 78% 90%0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Return DistributionNormal, m = 10%, s = 25%
Bin
Fre
quency
COHERENT RISK MEASURE Criteria–Monotonicity– Sub-additivity– Positive homogeneity– Translation invariance
MONOTONICITY
Expression
– If portfolio Z2 always has better values than portfolio Z1 under all scenarios then the risk of Z2 should be less than the risk of Z1.
SUB-ADDITIVITY
Expression
– Indeed, the risk of two portfolios together cannot get any worse than adding the two risks separately: this is the diversification principle.
POSITIVE HOMOGENEITY Expression
– Loosely speaking, if you double your portfolio then you double your risk.
TRANSLATION INVARIANCE Expression
– The value a is just adding cash to your portfolio Z, which acts like an insurance: the risk of Z + a is less than the risk of Z, and the difference is exactly the added cash a.
COHERENT RISK MEASURE References:– Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M.,
Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently. Risk 10, November, 68-71
– Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3), 203-228
What is Risk Management?
RISK PROFILE
Natural▪
Engineered▪
TYPES OF RISK
Market Risk Liquidity Risk Operational Risk Inflation Risk Default Risk– ‘risk-free asset’
MARKET RISK
The uncertainty of an instrument’s earnings resulting from changes in market conditions such as the price of an asset, interest rates, market volatility, and market liquidity.
MARKET RISK
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)– Diversification
–Market versus Non-Market Risks
– Beta
POSSIBLE BETAS
Market (b =1)▪
b >1
b < 1
BUILDING THE SML
Beta
Retu
rnR
etu
rn
rM
rf
0 1
Risk Free Asset
Market
WHAT HAPPENS IN STOCK DIVERSIFICATION?▪
Number of Stocks
Vola
tilit
y o
f Po
rtfo
lio
Market Risk
Non-Market Risk
SOME APPROACHES TO RISK Notional Amount
Sensitivity Analysis– Inputs– VaR
Scenario Analysis– Events
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
VAR OVERVIEW
Sensitivity Measure
‘Worst-Case-Scenario’
Downside Risk Only
Lower Tail
1/100 Year Flood Level
VAR DEFINITION
Value at Risk…– The maximum dollar amount that is
expected to be lost over X time at Y significance.
– EXAMPLE: VaR = $1,000,000 in the next month at 99% significance.
• Expectation (typically) relative to historical performance of assets(s).
VAR ADVANTAGES
• Risk -> Single number• Firm wide summary– Handles futures, options, and other
complications• Relatively model free• Easy to explain• Deviations from normal
distributions
VALUE AT RISK (VAR)HISTORY
• Financial firms in the late 80’s used it for their trading portfolios
• JP Morgan, 1990’s– RiskMetrics, 1994
• Currently becoming:– Wide spread risk summary– Regulatory
USE
Basel Capital Accord– Banks encouraged to use internal
models to measure VaR– Use to ensure capital adequacy
(liquidity)– Compute daily at 99th percentile–Minimum price shock equivalent to
10 trading days (holding period)– Historical observation period ≥1
year
VAR CALCULATION APPROACHES Historical simulation
– Good – data available– Bad – past may not represent future– Bad – lots of data if many instruments
(correlated) Variance-covariance
– Assume distribution, use theoretical to calculate– Bad – assumes normal, stable correlation
Monte Carlo simulation– Good – flexible (can use any distribution in
theory)– Bad – depends on model calibration
POSSIBLE PROBLEMS
At 99% level, will exceed 3-4 times per year
Distributions have fat tails
Probability of loss – Not magnitude
DEFINING VAR
• Mark to market (value portfolio) – 100
• Identify and measure risk (future value)– Normal: mean = 100, std. = 10 over 1
month• Set time horizon of interest– 1 month
• Set confidence level: – 95%
VAR EXAMPLE Portfolio
value today = 100
Normal value (mean = 100, std = 10 per month), time horizon = 1 month,
95% VaR = 16.5
0.05 Percentile = 83.5
VAR DEFINITIONS IN WORDS
• Measure initial portfolio value (100)• For 95% confidence level, find 5th
percentile level of future portfolio values (83.5)
• The amount of this loss (16.5) is the VaR
• What does this say?– With probability 0.95 your losses will
be less than 16.5
INCREASING THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
• Increase level to 99%• Portfolio value = 76.5• VaR = 100-76.5 = 23.5• With probability 0.99, your losses
will be less than 23.5• Increasing confidence level,
increases VaR
CHOOSING VAR PARAMETERS
• Holding period– Risk environment– Portfolio constancy/liquidity
• Confidence level– How far into the tail?– VaR use– Data quantity
VAR USES
• Benchmark comparison– Interested in relative comparisons
across units or trading desks• Potential loss measure– Horizon related to liquidity and portfolio
turnover• Set capital cushion levels– Confidence level critical here
VAR LIMITATIONS
• Uninformative about extreme tails
• Bad portfolio decisions– Might add high expected return, but
high loss with low probability securities
– VaR/Expected return, calculations still not well understood
– VaR is not Sub-additive
SUB-ADDITIVE RISK MEASURES
• A sub-additive risk measure is
• Sum of risks is conservative (overestimate)
• VaR not sub-additive– Temptation to split up accounts or firms
Risk(A B)Risk(A)Risk(B)
Sources of Market Risk
SOURCES OF MARKET RISK Currency Risk
Fixed-Income Risk
Equity Risk
Commodity Risk