final administrative documents - nrc.gov · # independent nrc reviewer initial items in column c ;...

78
FACILITY NAME: Lucie Section 7 REPORT NUMBER: 2009 -302 FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS CONTENTS: Li Exam Preparation Checklist LI Final Exam Outline Quality Checklist LI’ Exam Security Agreements LI Final Administrative Topics Outline L1 Final Control Room & Walk-Through Test Outline LI Final Operating Test Quality Check Sheet Li Final Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet LI Final Transient and Event Check Sheet LI Final Competencies Check Sheet Final Written Exam Sample Plan RFinal Record of Rejected KAs Li Final Written Exam Quality Check Sheet LYFinal Written Exam Review Work Sheet LI’ Written Exam Grading Quality Check Sheet Location of Electronic Files: (ES-201-1) (ES-201 -2) (ES-201 -3) (ES-301 -1) (ES-301 -2) (ES-301 -3) (ES-301 -4) (ES-301 -5) (ES-301 -6) (ES-401 -11213) (ES-401 -4) (ES-401 -6) (ES-401 -9) (ES-403-1) Submitted By: _RlBaldwin Verified By:

Upload: others

Post on 02-Sep-2019

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FACILITY NAME:

____St

Lucie Section 7

REPORT NUMBER: 2009 -302

FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS

CONTENTS:

Li Exam Preparation ChecklistLI Final Exam Outline Quality ChecklistLI’ Exam Security AgreementsLI Final Administrative Topics OutlineL1 Final Control Room & Walk-Through Test OutlineLI Final Operating Test Quality Check SheetLi Final Simulator Scenario Quality Check SheetLI Final Transient and Event Check SheetLI Final Competencies Check Sheet

Final Written Exam Sample PlanRFinal Record of Rejected KAsLi Final Written Exam Quality Check SheetLYFinal Written Exam Review Work SheetLI’ Written Exam Grading Quality Check Sheet

Location of Electronic Files:

(ES-201-1)(ES-201 -2)(ES-201 -3)(ES-301 -1)(ES-301 -2)(ES-301 -3)(ES-301 -4)(ES-301 -5)(ES-301 -6)(ES-401 -11213)(ES-401 -4)(ES-401 -6)(ES-401 -9)(ES-403-1)

Submitted By: _RlBaldwin Verified By:

Page 2: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-l

Facility: 2009-302 St. Lucie Date of Examination: 01/11/2010

acilitlit NRCExaminations Developed by:

Writte I Operating Test Wntten / Operating Test

TChief

argetTask Description (Reference) Examiner’s

a eInitials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) RSB

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C. 1 .d; C.2.e) RSB

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) RSB

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) RSB

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] RSB

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l’s, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as RSB

applicable (C.1.e andf; C.3.d)

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility RSBlicensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45 } 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, asapplicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, RSBES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g andh; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398’s) due (C. 1 .1; C.2.g; ES-202) RSB

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202) RSB

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review RSB(C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) RSB

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor RSB(C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirmqualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent RSB

(C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee RSB(C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to RSBNRC examiners (C.3 .i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination dateidentified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on acase-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

Page 3: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FINAL

___

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

Facility: St. Lucie Date of Examination: Oct. 19, 2009

InitialsItem Task Description — —

1 a. Veri that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R b Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance withI Section Dl of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. ,,4F/ 1h

T 7-—T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. .4 ‘1..

d Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate,

b2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number

of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, / 4’S and major transients. — — —

M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected numberU and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation scheduleL without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usingA at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicatedT from the applicants’ audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. — — —

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative /and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. v1 ). —

3 a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks

W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the formT (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form f, -L(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified f(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations — — —

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix /of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. AL- — —

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered -

in the appropriate exam sections.— —

E b Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. — —

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. p — —

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ,4’/ A. — —

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.— —

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO). ‘.Ai,t

a Author,p,,,,Printe Name nature ,ate

b Facility Reviewer(*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#) ‘c1A) ,4. 1,1,7/47

d NRC Supervisor “44 ‘f. 1f,/fS/

,

Note. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column ‘c”; chief examiner concurrence required.Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

F I NAL/

Page 4: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-201

F*

Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

Facility: St. Lucie Date of Examination: Oct. 19, 2009

InitialsItem Task Description — — —

1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R b Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance withI Section D 1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. ,4,/ ,/,)

TT c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 4 12- —

d Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KJA statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required numberof normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, /S and major transients. —

M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number

U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation scheduleL without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usingA at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicatedT from the applicants’ audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ‘‘ — —

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative /and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 4)

3 a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks

W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the torn,T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form / IL(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified F’ n.L.(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations — — —

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix /of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. AL. —

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered-

in the appropriate exam sections. -

E b Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55,45 sampling is appropriate. , %4f

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. y44 pIR d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ,4’/ IC.. ,i4A

——------

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 7f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a Author,,4,Printe Nam nature

,1ate

b Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRCChiefExaminer(#) ‘RIL41.4D S //13/c)

d NRC Supervisor r Ai, rik ,_1J F

Note. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column ‘c”; chief examiner concurrence required.Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

LQTTJ 44 - iL IL) ‘i1? -

- JL4fy.’J

rz

1*

Jia, / ( 2.

Page 5: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FINS

o,.j

6- 2-I-

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES.201-2

Facility: Sf L(.e Date of Examination: I u

InitialsItem Task Description

a b* c#

1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. 4;wR b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.TT c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.E .

.

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. ! , 2

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required numberof normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications,

S and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected numberU and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation scheduleL without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using fl.A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicatedT from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative -

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks

W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form :T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form -?(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations — —

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix L2of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. — —

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered t.in the appropriate exam sections. —

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. j

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 1AL e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO) .i-

a AuthorjeSignature p,pte,

b. Facility Reviewer (*) .:J j lj?t Sc I

c. NRC Chief Examiner—r/

d. NRC SupervisorLWLw.

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c”; chief examiner concurrence required.* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

Page 6: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-

201

Exa

min

atio

nS

ecuri

tyA

gre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-201

-3

1.Pr

e-E

xam

inat

ion

‘i1’

7/b

I ack

now

ledg

eth

atIh

ave

acqu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledg

eab

out

the

NR

Clic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nssc

hedu

led

for

the

wee

k(s)

ofas

ofth

eda

te’

ofm

ysi

gnat

ure.

I agr

eeth

atIw

illno

tkn

owin

gly

divu

lge

any

info

rmat

ion

abou

tth

ese

exam

inat

ions

toan

ype

rson

sw

hoha

veno

tbe

enau

thor

ized

byth

e

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

.Iu

nder

stan

dth

atIa

mno

tto

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

bead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nsfr

omth

isda

teun

tilco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C

(e.g

.,ac

ting

asa

sim

ulat

orbo

oth

oper

ator

orco

mm

unic

ator

isac

cept

able

ifth

ein

divi

dual

does

not

sele

ctth

etr

aini

ngco

nten

tor

prov

ide

dire

ctor

indi

rect

feed

back

).F

urth

erm

ore,

I am

awar

eof

the

phys

ical

secu

rity

mea

sure

san

dre

quir

emen

ts(a

sdo

cum

ente

din

the

faci

lity

lice

nse

espr

oced

ures

)an

dun

ders

tand

that

viol

atio

nof

the

cond

itio

nsof

this

agre

emen

tm

ayre

sult

inca

ncel

lati

onof

the

exam

inat

ions

and/

oran

enfo

rcem

ent

actio

nag

ains

tm

eor

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

.Iw

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

tor

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

any

indi

catio

nsor

sugg

esti

ons

that

exam

inat

ion

secu

rity

may

have

been

com

prom

ised

.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

Toth

ebe

stof

my

know

ledg

e,Id

idno

tdi

vulg

eto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

ons

any

info

rmat

ion

conc

erni

ngth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

d

duri

ngth

ew

eek(

s)of

i/H

.Fr

omth

eda

teth

atIe

nter

edin

toth

isse

curi

tyag

reem

ent

until

the

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,Id

idno

t

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

who

wer

ead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

ns,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

d

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

E

1.F

ed

4nJ

2.sJ

Z.cr7t-

3.4

,4.

flu

5.C

2A

26.

/.

(,)ijZ

_

7.L)

i.-,

r K’t-?

9.

;‘j/,

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NO

TE

S:

JOB

TITL

E/

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

L-c

!cj

M2

-cr

Ew

\j.e

ov,47I

RW---

ici-

/

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

DA

TESI

GN

AT

UR

E(2

)

I%/.

1jtJ’9

//g

‘‘

,//(

/o’i

/(-

I)-’

‘7“Ii

/rO

DA

TEN

OT

E

i/9

/io

‘Jf2

S)j

Ill T

tI0

ES

-201

,P

age

27of

28

Page 7: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-

201

Exa

min

atio

nS

ecur

ity

Agre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-201

-3

1.Pr

e-E

xam

inat

ion

..J.

ci/

i4a

ackn

owle

dge

that

Ihav

eac

quir

edsp

ecia

lize

dkn

owle

dge

abou

tth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

sche

dule

dfo

rth

ew

eek(

s)of

__

__

__

__

__

_

ofth

eda

teof

my

sign

atur

e.Ia

gree

that

Iwill

not

know

ingl

ydi

vulg

ean

yin

form

atio

nab

out

thes

eex

amin

atio

nsto

any

pers

ons

who

have

not

been

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

.Iu

nder

stan

dth

atI a

mno

tto

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

bead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nsfr

omth

isda

teun

tilco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C(e

.g.,

actin

gas

asi

mul

ator

boot

hop

erat

oror

com

mun

icat

oris

acce

ptab

leif

the

indi

vidu

aldo

esno

tse

lect

the

trai

ning

cont

ent

orpr

ovid

edi

rect

orin

dire

ctfe

edba

ck).

Fur

ther

mor

e,Ia

maw

are

ofth

eph

ysic

alse

curi

tym

easu

res

and

requ

irem

ents

(as

docu

men

ted

inth

efa

cilit

yli

cens

ee’s

proc

edur

es)

and

unde

rsta

ndth

atvi

olat

ion

ofth

eco

nditi

ons

ofth

isag

reem

ent

may

resu

ltin

canc

ella

tion

ofth

eex

amin

atio

nsan

d/or

anen

forc

emen

tac

tion

agai

nst

me

orth

efa

cilit

yli

cens

ee.

Iwill

imm

edia

tely

repo

rtto

faci

lity

man

agem

ent

orth

eN

RC

chie

fex

amin

eran

yin

dica

tions

orsu

gges

tion

sth

atex

amin

atio

nse

curi

tym

ayha

vebe

enco

mpr

omis

ed.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

Toth

ebe

stof

my

know

ledg

e,I d

idno

tdi

vulg

eto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

ons

any

info

rmat

ion

conc

erni

ngth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

ddu

ring

the

wee

k(s)

of/

.Fr

omth

eda

teth

atIe

nter

edin

toth

isse

curi

tyag

reem

ent

until

the

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,Id

idno

tin

stru

ct,

eval

uate

,or

prov

ide

perf

orm

ance

feed

back

toth

ose

appl

ican

tsw

how

ere

adm

inis

tere

dth

ese

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

,ex

cept

assp

ecif

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

EJO

BTI

TLE

/R

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

YSI

GN

AT

UR

E(1

)D

ATE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(2)

DA

TEN

OT

E

1.ô/i

1#w

,,&

si

c-

2.---

i\-

•‘I

sOS

iO

tb

vff09

///

4.)

€/e

uJ

r//

----4--.

-,

5.fce\V

\c

r\J

cLc\

tiA

-cC

FL

&i4

kI?L

i)2(#

jt°

6.141

ikbech

L2p7.is

sa-(u

ni

,4d,k.

.iJt9//

’1v

-/

1i0

:P4’ItP

.924JL

.)

Ib

/4I’

10

.1

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NO

TE

S:S

ES

-201

,P

age

27of

28

Page 8: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-

201

Exa

min

atio

nS

ecuri

tyA

gre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-201

-3

1.P

re-E

xam

inat

ion

Iack

now

ledg

eth

atIh

ave

acqu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledg

eab

out

the

NR

Cli

cens

ing

exam

inat

ions

sche

dule

dfo

rth

ew

eek(

s)of

i/

1,/,

Oas

ofth

eda

teof

my

sign

atur

e.Ia

gree

that

Iwill

not

know

ingl

ydi

vulg

ean

yin

form

atio

nab

out

thes

eex

amin

atio

nsto

any

pers

ons

who

have

not

been

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

.Iu

nder

stan

dth

atI a

mno

tto

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

bead

min

iste

red

thes

eli

cens

ing

exam

inat

ions

from

this

date

until

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,ex

cept

assp

ecif

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

(e.g

.,ac

ting

asa

sim

ulat

orbo

oth

oper

ator

orco

mm

unic

ator

isac

cept

able

ifth

ein

divi

dual

does

not

sele

ctth

etr

aini

ngco

nten

tor

prov

ide

dire

ctor

indi

rect

feed

back

).F

urth

erm

ore,

Iam

awar

eof

the

phys

ical

secu

rity

mea

sure

san

dre

quir

emen

ts(a

sdo

cum

ente

din

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

’spr

oced

ures

)an

dun

ders

tand

that

viol

atio

nof

the

cond

itio

nsof

this

agre

emen

tm

ayre

sult

inca

ncel

lati

onof

the

exam

inat

ions

and/

oran

enfo

rcem

ent

actio

nag

ains

tm

eor

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

,w

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

tor

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

any

indi

cati

ons

orsu

gges

tion

sth

atex

amin

atio

nse

curi

tym

ayha

vebe

enco

mpr

omis

ed.

2.P

ost

-Exam

inat

ion

To

the

best

ofm

ykn

owle

jig9,

Idid

not

divu

lge

toan

yun

auth

oriz

edpe

rson

san

yin

form

atio

nco

ncer

ning

the

NR

Cli

cens

ing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

ddu

ring

the

wee

k(s)

of‘/

“/,

O.

From

the

date

that

Ient

ered

into

this

secu

rity

agre

emen

tun

tilth

eco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

Idid

not

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

who

wer

ead

min

iste

red

thes

eli

cens

ing

exam

inat

ions

,ex

cept

assp

ecif

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

E

1..

2.Lk2/e/i/flI

WC

k3.

-r:(4

ve5n

4.P

ht’

,5

(4

L4

4.X

GA

4c4

a”t

6.k

”e

\_

\

7.‘V

AL

T\V

\

8.,A

//cF

r/34),

9k

9.T

hzi-z;J ‘2

2?

L/c

12.

‘zck

i’€,t

13.

14.

15.

NO

TE

S:

JOB

TIT

LE

/R

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y

J/L

i/4

1i&

T’

ru

--

/-rech(

Zvc

,x!

:Z47.

DA

TE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(2)

DA

TE

NO

TE

I--

1/13

1/1

44

/113)1

0

_____________________

-‘

-

.

--

1/i

s/to

--

/k

-

/

//4

’./

/-2/

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

ji

SI-h

7)fi

772,

qiJ1,-J

CM

/—

-—

-,.

-,.

--

4/7

/

t(

ES-

201,

Pag

e27

of28

Page 9: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-201

Ex

amin

atio

nS

ecu

rity

Agre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-201

-3

1.P

re-E

xam

inat

ion

I ack

now

ledg

eth

atIh

ave

acqu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledg

eab

out

the

NR

Clic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nssc

hedu

led

for

the

wee

k(s)

of

__

__

__

__

__

_

asof

the

date

ofm

ysi

gnat

ure.

I agr

eeth

atIw

illno

tkn

owin

gly

divu

lge

any

info

rmat

ion

abou

tth

ese

exam

inat

ions

toan

ype

rson

sw

hoha

veno

tbe

enau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

chie

fex

amin

er.

Iund

erst

and

that

Iam

not

toin

stru

ct,

eval

uate

,or

prov

ide

perf

orm

ance

feed

back

toth

ose

appl

ican

tssc

hedu

led

tobe

adm

inis

tere

dth

ese

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

from

this

date

until

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,ex

cept

assp

ecif

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

(e.g

.,ac

ting

asa

sim

ulat

orbo

oth

oper

ator

orco

mm

unic

ator

isac

cept

able

ifth

ein

divi

dual

does

not

sele

ctth

etr

aini

ngco

nten

tor

prov

ide

dire

ctor

indi

rect

feed

back

).F

urth

erm

ore,

Iam

awar

eof

the

phys

ical

secu

rity

mea

sure

san

dre

quir

emen

ts(a

sdo

cum

ente

din

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

’spr

oced

ures

)an

dun

ders

tand

that

viol

atio

nof

the

cond

ition

sof

this

agre

emen

tm

ayre

sult

inca

ncel

lati

onof

the

exam

inat

ions

and/

oran

enfo

rcem

ent

actio

nag

ains

tm

eor

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

.I w

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

tor

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

any

indi

catio

nsor

sugg

esti

ons

that

exam

inat

ion

secu

rity

may

have

been

com

prom

ised

.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

To

the

best

ofm

yknow

lede,

Idid

not

divu

lge

toan

yun

auth

oriz

edpe

rson

san

yin

form

atio

nco

ncer

ning

the

NR

Clic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nsad

min

iste

red

duri

ngth

ew

eek(

s)of

/i‘i

’o.

From

the

date

that

Ient

ered

into

this

secu

rity

agre

emen

tun

tilth

eco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

Idid

not

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

who

wer

ead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

ns,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

E

11X

’r///

2.fl

czetJ

3.P

44

.-L

4. •

.r?JI/c

-

6.26

P-4

7.T

‘‘-

8.L

YO

éfM

ci

-

(3(1

,111

.j

-‘c-’5

712

.V

A.J

h.A

’1

13.3o

14

.A

IC

fr*X

O

L.c

7r

tLA

LA

’-L1ñ

QiZ

O/

UA

1i7

4T

Sic

/A

-’4

yIZc

j/fr’;l(

.T/

fA-c

-(A

-Df

DA

TE

SIG

NA

]JJR

(2)

DA

TE

NO

TE

‘J/

Jc9

2h

z?

./S

7’L

V//

2C,

ilIY

lec

7JfL

/7

cZ

j

______

23

__

____

i7zi

______

-?/7

o7

2.A

z2

______

-/?T

I&

1Th.

-

________

7/3

o/

___

__j?

.j)

.1

JOB

TITL

E/

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

,?J/

’(,L

’AC

J4

/)7A

.JS

Q6c1Piir

-O-

-i’g

,..

g,eI

/

Lc.

o—

__

__

__

__

__

_

flca

‘_->

-2

NO

TE

S:

.

L-r

b.

/ô;

--v

L--

ii-

•4—

FQ’

q/i

3

J2z1

,DJio

ES

-201

,P

age

27of

28

Page 10: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-

201

Exa

min

atio

nS

ecur

ity

Agre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-201

4

1.Pr

e-E

xam

inat

ion

9.

o/n/

kiIac

kn

ow

led

ge

that

Iha

veac

qu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledge

ab

ou

tth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ion

ssc

hed

ule

dfo

rth

ew

eek(

s)of

as

ofth

eda

teof

my

signat

ure

.Iag

ree

that

Iwill

not

know

ingly

divu

lge

any

info

rmat

ion

ab

ou

tth

ese

exam

inat

ion

sto

any

pers

ons

who

hav

en

ot

been

auth

ori

zed

byth

eN

RC

chie

fex

amin

er.

Iunder

stan

dth

atIam

nott

otn

stn.

ict,

eval

uat

e,o

rp

rov

ide

perf

orm

ance

feedback

toth

ose

appl

ican

tssc

hedu

led

tobe

ad

min

iste

red

thes

eli

censi

ng

exam

inat

ion

sfr

om

this

date

until

com

ple

tion

of

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion

,ex

cept

as

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

ori

zed

byth

eN

RC

(e.g

.,ac

ting

as

asi

mula

tor

booth

oper

ator

or

com

mu

nic

ato

ris

accepta

ble

itth

ein

div

idual

do

es

not

sele

ct

the

trai

nin

gco

nte

nt

or

pro

vid

edir

ect

or

indir

ect

feed

bac

k).

Furt

her

more

,1am

aw

are

of

the

phys

ical

secu

rity

measu

res

arid

requir

emen

ts(a

sdocu

men

ted

inth

efa

cilit

yli

cen

see’s

pro

ced

ure

s)and

unders

tand

that

viol

atio

no

fth

eco

ndit

ion

so

fth

isagre

em

ent

may

resu

ltin

canc

ella

tion

ofth

eex

amin

atio

ns

an

dlo

ran

en

forc

em

en

tac

tion

again

stm

eor

the

faci

rity

lice

nse

e.Iw

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anagem

ent

or

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

any

indi

catio

nso

rsu

ggest

ions

that

exam

inat

ion

secu

rity

may

have

been

com

prom

ised

.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

To

the

best

of

my

know

ledg

e,I

did

riot

div

ulg

eto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

on

san

yin

form

atio

nco

ncer

ning

the

NR

Cli

cen

sin

gex

am

inati

on

sad

min

iste

red

duri

ngth

ew

eek

(s)

of

)i

From

the

date

that

Iente

red

into

this

secu

rity

agre

emen

tunt

ilth

eco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

Idid

not

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

who

wer

ead

min

iste

red

thes

eli

censi

ng

exam

inat

ions,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C.

8.C

L’t

Fir

,-F

9. ii..T

h’

L,)

ET

-12

.(C

.J

4u.

1-

13

.

S--•

M-’-

L,1

Q5IZ

f)/V

AL4

&‘A

13

.s’.)z

o/

y4

c.f

44

iOC

/k4L

s4.r

5/e

dse

IfA

L-1

d4

dr-tt.

----

“!L

?!

7/f

5/1_

_4,

1-4

-

J1o

PR

INT

ED

NA

ME

JOB

TIT

LE

!R

ES

PO

NS

IBIL

ITY

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

DA

TE

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(2)

DA

TEN

OT

E

4t’

&;

12,#

/V/(///

,i4

4-ex/i

2.C

hpW

efl

cq’r

Sjk

3.C

Ay

OP

41.4

YA

CA

E: ‘

*F

FA

-o‘W

’‘-‘

/6.

<ô,

-

7,L

di

‘Co

tr

14.

15.9

3G

LclL

.)o

o!?

NO

TE

S:

--

‘713

0/n?

ES

-201

,P

age

27of

28

Page 11: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-201

Exam

inat

ion

Sec

uri

tyA

gre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-20’

14

1.P

re-E

xam

inat

ion

+

Iack

now

ledg

eth

at[h

ave

acqu

ired

spec

aliz

edkn

owle

dge

abou

t the

NR

Clic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nssc

hedu

led

for

the

wee

k(s)

oftas

ofth

eda

teof

my

sign

atur

e.Ia

gree

that

Iwill

not

know

ingl

ydi

vulg

ean

yin

form

atio

nab

outt

hes

eex

amin

atio

nsto

any

pers

ons

who

have

not

been

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

Cch

ief

exam

iner

.[u

nder

stan

dth

at1a

mno

tto

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

bead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensI

ngex

amin

atio

nsfr

omth

isda

teun

tilco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C(e

.g.,

actin

gas

asi

mul

ator

boot

hop

erat

oror

com

mun

icat

oris

acce

ptab

leif

the

indM

duat

does

not

sele

ctth

etr

aini

ngco

nten

tor

prov

ide

d&ec

tor

indi

rect

feed

back

).F

urth

erm

ore

I am

awar

eof

the

phys

ical

secu

rity

mea

sure

san

dre

quir

emen

ts(a

sdo

cum

ente

din

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

’spr

oced

ures

)an

dun

ders

tand

that

viol

atio

nof

the

cond

ition

sof

this

agre

emen

t may

resu

ltin

cano

ella

tion

ofth

eex

amin

atio

r.s

andf

oran

enfo

rcem

ent

actio

nag

ains

tm

eor

the

faci

lity

lice

nsee

.Iw

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

t ort

heN

RC

thie

fex

amin

eran

yin

dica

tions

orsu

gges

tion

sth

atex

amin

atio

nse

curi

tym

ayha

vebe

enco

mpr

omis

ed.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

To

the

best

ofm

ykr

iow

ledg

,Id

idno

tdi

vulg

eto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

ons

any

info

rmat

ion

conc

erni

ngth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

ddu

ring

the

wee

k(s)

of‘1

ito

From

the

date

that

Ient

ered

into

this

secu

rity

agre

emen

tunt

ilth

eco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

Idid

not

inst

ruct

,eva

luat

e,or

prov

ide

perf

orm

ance

feed

back

toth

ose

appl

ican

tsw

how

ere

adm

inis

tere

dth

ese

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

,ex

ceptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

EJO

BT

ITL

E/R

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

YSI

GN

AT

UR

E(1

)D

AT

ES

lGN

AJR

(2)

DA

TEN

OTE

iA

/f’

-t/4

vi

44

2.j

a,1

es

fl’c

i’6

j,t’

C‘r’

‘w

/—

3.fk

OrW

iM4

Wc.

’.L

st

4.L

.4c?

IJA

IZ

r1-7

5/J

4kck,

6.‘J

$7

1/2

/‘c

.i

7-(

-ci

8.C

L’D

4es

fcd’

-

scr

,i.-

L_.

.

i?

II.

S/

VA

A12

.rV

5M

rR.o

1yx4ro

-,.

prg

.o/

4i;f_

:L

diz

13O

fo

15

.OG

rL£oo

J7

/I4

L..I2A

’DtJ

-N

OT

ES:

cs-

,,-te

LFP

’—. E

S.2

O1,

Pag

e27

of28

Page 12: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-201

.E

xam

inat

ion

Sec

uri

tyA

gre

emen

tF

orm

ES

-20

13

1.P

ro-E

xam

inat

Ion

+e.t

/!7

/i()

Iack

now

ledg

eth

atIh

ave

acqu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledg

eab

out

the

NR

Clic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nssc

hedu

led

for

the

wee

k(s)

of__

____

____

asof

the

date

ofm

ysi

gnat

ure.

Iagr

eeth

atI w

Ilno

tkn

owin

gly

divu

lge

any

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

seex

amin

atio

nsto

any

pers

ons

wio

have

not

been

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

Cch

ief e

xam

iner

.Iu

nder

stan

dth

atIa

mno

t to

inst

njct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

bead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

nsfr

omth

isda

teun

tilco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

exce

ptas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C(e

.g.,

actin

gas

asi

mul

ator

boot

hop

erat

oror

com

mun

icat

oris

acce

ptab

leif

the

indi

vidu

aldo

esno

tse

lect

the

trai

ning

cont

ento

rpr

ovid

edi

rect

orin

dire

ctfe

edba

ck)

Fur

ther

mor

e,Ia

maw

are

ofth

eph

ysic

alse

curi

tym

easu

res

and

requ

irem

ents

(as

docu

men

ted

inth

efa

cilit

yli

cens

ee’s

proc

edur

es)

and

unde

rsta

ndth

atvi

olat

ion

ofth

eco

nditi

ons

ofth

isag

reem

ent m

ayre

sult

inca

ncef

latio

nof

the

exam

inat

ions

andl

oran

enfo

rcem

enta

ctio

nag

ains

tme

orth

efa

cilit

ylic

ense

e.I w

itim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

tor

the

NR

Cch

iefe

xam

iner

any

indi

catio

nsor

sugg

esti

ons

that

exam

inat

ion

secu

rity

may

have

been

com

prom

ised

.

2..P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

To

the

best

ofm

ykn

owte

de,

did

not d

ivul

geto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

ons

any

info

rmat

ion

conc

erni

ngth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

ddu

ring

the

wee

k(s)

of!/

t1I

’t).

From

the

date

that

I ent

ered

into

this

secu

rity

agre

emen

tun

tilth

eco

mpl

etio

nof

exam

inat

ion

adm

inis

trat

ion,

I did

not

inst

ruct

, eva

luat

e,or

prov

ide

perf

orm

ance

feed

back

toth

ose

appl

ican

tsw

how

ere

adm

inis

tere

dth

ese

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

,ex

cept

assp

ectf

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

.

flc.

Lo

Crs.a

AL

A--

RD

/-4cr3

cso

/V

AK

4ro6

sZ

/L

f4L

2.L

,-

j_

IA

.L.I

.4’1

,IIvI

. w iiio

h,

A’

&L

-jq

-\-)

Fc.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

E•

SlG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

JOB

TIT

LE

IRE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

DA

TES

IGN

A,3

JRF

(2)

DA

TE

NO

TE

11

AL

/f’/f//

7’y1’

eZ

1,

VIo/

‘A/4

4.)1

AJ

Dp

1-:d1I.M

/

2.cJW

t’fl

t-xfr

Jit

A4’

(‘,/

f/AV

ID,

—3.ç

DII

A--

C0

-.

- -,-o

___

5. 6.1

fé-P

A’

7.1

8.çL

,’pe

fArc

e9.

,‘1

e.”

-4’’

.-’

1o

.rL

l.(&

cA

11.r

4z4

J4)E

12.A

vJu

13.th

i14

.

NO

TE

S:.

,-

1

..-r

i.

4

• if,

’il

/j3

______

We

14k”

ES

-201,

Pag

e27

of28

Page 13: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-201

Exa

min

atio

nS

ecu

rity

Ag

reem

ent

Form

ES

-2013

1.P

re-E

xam

inat

ion

oi/

JJo

ackn

owle

dge

that

have

acqu

ired

spec

iali

zed

know

ledg

eab

out t

heN

RC

ilcen

sing

exam

inat

ions

sche

dule

dfo

rthe

wee

k(s)

of__

____

____

ofth

eda

teof

my

sign

atur

e.Ia

gree

that

IWill

notk

now

ingl

ydi

vulg

ean

yin

form

atio

nab

outt

hese

exam

inat

ions

toan

ype

rson

sw

hoha

veno

tbe

en.a

utho

rize

dby

the

NR

Cch

iefe

xam

iner

.Iu

nder

stan

dth

atIa

mno

t to

inst

ruct

,ev

alua

te,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

sche

dule

dto

be

adm

inis

tere

dth

ese

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

from

this

date

until

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,ex

cept

assp

ecif

ical

lyno

ted

belo

wan

dau

thor

ized

byth

eN

RC

(e.g

.,ac

ting

asa

sim

ulat

orbo

oth

oper

ator

orco

mm

unic

ator

isac

cept

able

ifth

ein

dMdu

aldo

esno

tsel

ectt

hetr

aini

ngco

nten

tor

prov

ide

dire

ctor

indi

rect

feed

back

).Fu

rthe

rmor

e,1a

maw

are

ofth

eph

ysic

alse

curi

tym

easu

res

and

requ

irem

ents

(as

docu

men

ted

inth

efa

cilit

yli

cens

ee’s

proc

edur

es)

and

unde

rsta

ndth

atvi

olat

ion

ofth

eco

nditi

ons

ofth

isag

reem

entm

ayre

sult

inca

ncel

latio

nof

the

exam

inat

ions

andl

oran

enfo

rcem

ent a

ctio

nag

ains

tme

orth

efa

cilit

ylic

ense

e.Iw

illim

med

iate

lyre

port

tofa

cilit

ym

anag

emen

tor

the

NR

Cch

iefe

xam

iner

any

indi

catio

nsor

sugg

esti

ons

that

exam

inat

ion

secu

rity

may

have

been

com

prom

ised

.

2.P

ost-

Exa

min

atio

n

Toth

ebe

stof

my

know

leFf

g,I d

idno

tdi

vulg

eto

any

unau

thor

ized

pers

ons

any

info

rmat

ion

conc

erni

ngth

eN

RC

licen

sing

exam

inat

ions

adm

inis

tere

ddu

ring

the

wee

k(s)

of/

I’Fr

omth

eda

teth

atI e

nter

edin

toth

isse

curi

tyag

reem

ent

until

the

com

plet

ion

ofex

amin

atio

nad

min

istr

atio

n,Id

idno

tin

stru

ct,e

valu

ate,

orpr

ovid

epe

rfor

man

cefe

edba

ckto

thos

eap

plic

ants

who

wer

ead

min

iste

red

thes

elic

ensi

ngex

amin

atio

ns, e

xcep

tas

spec

ific

ally

note

dbe

low

and

auth

oriz

edby

the

NR

C.

PRIN

TE

DN

AM

E

1. 2.‘.

.O3.

fl,.

sg.

4110

4. 5.f:_

6.la

7.A

Ira-

C’i

tfl3

&8.

‘b1

p9.

_____

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NO

TE

S:

JOB

TITL

EI

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

SIG

NA

TU

RE

(1)

Fx

X-t

Ss’

‘.CA.

k .sR

o/ /

)O

t1

J.Jd

,c\J

cJC

4zC

-rL

OtJ1

.1

</

DA

TESI

GN

AT

UR

E(2

)D

ATE

NO

TE

--q74-c

\_s(D

jY

o--2

—,

friS

”/i

ES

-201

,P

age

27of

28á

Page 14: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 I Lministrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1

Facility: St. Lucie Plant Date of Examination: 01/05 /10

Examination Level: RO SRO Operating Test Number: HLC-19A NRC

Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed(see Note) Code*

M, R

Conduct of Operations Determine Shutdown Margin Unit 2

Determine Time to Boil on Loss of Shutdown Cooling

Conduct of Operations N, R

(RO Part I only) Part 1: Obtain a Flux Log from the

N DCS and delete Incore(s) Detector(s) from the DCS.Equipment Control

(SRO Part 1 and part 2) Part 2: Determine from deletedIncores, applicable FSAR operability

M, R Evaluate Survey Map Data

Radiation Control

Respond to Security Event

Emergency Procedures/Plan N, R

(SRO)

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they areretaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

* Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom(D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)(N)ew or (M)odifled from bank ( 1)(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)

FINAL

Page 15: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1

ADMINISTRATIVE JPM SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

CONDUCT OF OPERATION F I NALAl - (RO!SRO) Determine Shutdown Margin, Unit 2

Unit 2 was at 100% power for 120 days, 3143 EFPH. An automatic reactor! turbine trip justoccurred. CEA 8 did not drop and is at 132” withdrawn. Current RCS temperature is 532°F, RCSCb is 962 ppm, and current time is 0500. You are directed to verify shutdown margin for thecurrent plant conditions.

CONDUCT OF OPERATION

A2 - (RO/SRO) Determine time to boil on loss of Shutdown cooling

Unit 1 is in a Refueling outage preparing to lift the Reactor Vessel head. RCS level is 35 feet. Aloss of Shutdown Cooling occurs. Determine the time to boil and the flow to makeup for Boil-Off.

Given:• RCS temperature is 95°F• The Unit was tripped on Oct. 18, at 0000• Loss of Shutdown Cooling occurred at: Oct 23, 0100

The Applicant will be using 1-0440030, “Shutdown Cooling Off-Normal” Tables 2, 3, 4, Figure 1and Data Sheet 1 to determine the above.

EQUIPMENT CONTROL

A3-(RO!SRO)

(RO) Part 1 only: Obtain a Flux Log from the DCS and delete an Incore Detector form the DCS.(SRO) Part 1 andPart 2: Determine from deleted Incores, applicable FSAR operability.

RADIATION CONTROL

A4 - (RO/SRO)

Using the Survey map, determine the radiological postings in each Unit 1 Charging pump room.

2

Page 16: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES IPLAN F I NALA5 - (SRO) Response to Security Event

Both Units are at 100% power. Unit 1, 1A Diesel Generator is running loaded for the 180 daysurveillance test. Unit 2, 2C AFW pump is running for a surveillance test to satisfy postmaintenance testing requirements.

At 0815, the Shift Manager receives a report from the NRC of an Airborne Threat. The estimatedtime to site arrival is 0855. A track of interest is verified by the NRC due to anomalous flightactivity. The Shift Manager is to:

• Determine appropriate plant actions to take lAW Appendix D, “RESPONSE TOINFORMATIONAL AIRBORNE THREAT” of ONP-72.01, “Response to Security Events”

• Determine if the E-plan is to be implemented and if so, classify the event. (time criticalaction of 15 minutes from 0815)

• If classified, fill out the State of Florida notification form.

NOTE: the applicant will be given the entire procedure, ONP-72.01, “Response to SecurityEvents” and Classification of Emergency procedures. They will be required to determine whatappendix to implement, what actions to take and what classification to declare. They will also berequired to fill out the State of Florida Notification form. The time critical portion of this JPM is toclassify within 15 minutes of the 0815 time.

3

Page 17: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ANAL

ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2

Facility: St. Lucie Plant Date of Examination: 01/11/2010

Exam Level: RD SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test No.: HLC-19A NRC

Control Room Systems’ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Code* SafetyFunction

SI Alternate Charging flowpath to RCS through “A” HPSI header, Unit 2S A M L 2(0821115)

S2 Manually actuate AFAS, Unit 2 (modified from 0821077) 5, A, M, L 4s

S3 Emergency Borate Unit 2 5, A, N, L 1

S4 Cool the Quench Tank, Unit 2 5, N 5

S5 Place the Pressurizer on Recirc. Unit 2 5, A, N 3

S6 Respond to Control Room OAI radiation alarms, Unit 2 S, A, N 7

S7 Energize 2A3 4.16KV bus from Unit 1 SBO cross tie breaker S, D, L 6(08211 29T)

C8 (RD Only) Respond to CCW Excessive Activity - Unit 1 (0821030) C, D 8

C9 (RD Only) Vent Reactor Vessel Head Using RCGVS - UNIT 1 C, D 4(0821213)

In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRD-U)

P1 Align 1 C Intake Cooling Water Pump to the “A” header (0821 093) D 4s

P2 Align emergency cooling water to the 1A Instrument air compressor D, E 8(0821 068)

P3 Blend to the VCT using local control Unit 1 R, M 2

@ All RD and SRD-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safetyfunctions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions mayoverlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RD I SRO-l / SRD-U

(A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3(C)ontrol room(D)irect from bank 9 I 8 / 4(E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 / 1 I 1(EN)gineered safety feature - / - / 1 (control room system)(L)ow-Power I Shutdown 1 / 1 / 1(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2 / 2 / 1(P)revious 2 exams 3 / 3 / 2 (randomly selected)(R)CA(S)imulator

Page 18: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

IAES3Q1 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2

JPM SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

Si: Alternate Charging flowpath to RCS through “A” HPSI header F I NALUnit 2 is in 2-EOP-i5, “Functional Recovery”. Normal Charging flowpath is NOT available due toa Charging header break between V2429 and V2523. Appendix T, “Alternate Charging FlowPath to the RCS Through the ‘A’ HPSI Header” is required to be implemented in attempt tomaintain Pressurizer Level 30 to 68% while the HPSI Pumps are throttled. The 2B Chargingpump is out of service at turnover. When the applicant starts the 2A Charging pump, it trips 5seconds later. The only available Charging pump is the 2C. The applicant should refer back to theprocedure and use the 2C Charging pump to complete the lineup.

S2: Manually actuate AFAS, Unit 2

Unit 2 has experienced a SGTR on the 2B SG. The 2B SC has been isolated and AFW flow tothe 2A SG has isolated on an AFAS lockout due to zP between the 2A and 2B SG. AFAS-1 willbe manually initiated. Upon manual initiation, MV-09-i 1 and MV-09-9 fail to open. When theapplicant opens either valve it will trip 1 second later. (NOTE: both valves have this failure in butwhen either valve is placed to open it will clear the fault on the other valve, allowing the 2A ORthe 2C AFW pump to feed the 2A SG).

S3: Emergency Borate Unit 2

Post trip actions are being performed with excessive cool down occurring. When Emergencyboration is initiated. V2514 will not open. When the gravity feed valves are attempted to be openthey also will not open. V2504, Refueling Water to the Charging pumps, among othermanipulations will be required to successfully Emergency Borate.

S4: Cool the Quench Tank, Unit 2

Due to a weeping PORV V1474, the Quench tank is to be cooled lAW 2-NOP-Ol .07 Section 4.4Lowering QT temperature by Feed and Bleed.

S5: Place the Pressurizer on Recirc. Unit 2

With the Unit at 100% power, direction is given to place the Pressurizer on recirc. As the heatersare energized and pressure setpoint lowered, the sprays valves will start to open. A malfunctionin the controller will result in the PCV1100E going full open. Taking the controller to manual andlowering the output will not close the open valve, eventually requiring a manual trip prior to theTMLP trip setpoint. The reactor will fail to automatically trip if no action is taken. The 2B2 Reactorcoolant pump must be stopped or the Unit will depressurize to SlAS setpoint.

S6: Respond to Control Room OAI radiation alarms, Unit 2

Unit 1 is experiencing a LBLOCA with a breach in Containment integrity. As a result of thisrelease, Unit 2 Control Room has gone on ventilation recirc due to high radiation in the outside airintakes. Compliance with the procedure requires verification of ventilation lineup lAW 2-ONP-25.02, “Ventilation Systems”, Appendix B. As Appendix B is being followed, numerous damperfailures should be noted and corrective actions should be taken.

2

Page 19: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2

JPM SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

S7: Energize A3 4.16KV bus from Unit 1 SBO cross tie breaker F I NALUnit 2 is in a station blackout and Unit 1 has both emergency buses being supplied by their DieselGenerators. Direction is given to cross tie the lAB and 2AB 4.16KV Bus lAW 1-EOP-99,Appendix V, “Receiving AC Power from Unit 1 using the SBO Crosstie” This JPM is time critical.

C8: (RO Only) Respond to CCW Excessive Activity - Unit 1

CCW surge tank level is increasing causing Annunciator S-6 to alarm. Local indication revealshigh level in the surge tank. The Unit supervisor had directed the actions of ONOP 1-0310030,“COW Off Normal Operation” to determined the cause of the high surge tank level. ThePressurizer steam space sample heat exchanger (10) will be leaking. Isolation of the heatexchanger will stop the leak.

C9: (RO Only) Vent Reactor Vessel Head Using RCGVS - UNIT 1

A LOCA has occurred on Unit 1, forming a non-condensable bubble in the reactor vessel head.Direction has been given to vent the reactor vessel head to the Quench Tank lAW ONP 1-0120037, beginning with step 7.3.14.

P1: Align 10 Intake Cooling Water Pump to the ‘A” header

The 1A Intake Cooling Water pump is to taken out of service for maintenance. The 10 IntakeCooling Water pump is to be aligned to take it place lAW 1-NOP-21.03C, section 4.1. Theelectrical lineup required to support taking the 1A out of service has already been performed.

P2: Align emergency cooling water to the IA Instrument air compressor

A LOOP has occurred on Unit 1. Direction is given to align the Emergency Cooling System to the1A Instrument Air Compressor and start the Compressor lAW 1-EOP-99, “Appendix H “Operationof the lAand lB Instrument Air Compressors.

P3: Blend to the VCT using local control Unit 1

A blend to the VCT is required on Unit 1. FCV-2161 is unable to be opened. As a result, AppendixA of 1-ONP-02.01, Boron Concentration Control” is to be implemented to locally control additionof Boric acid and Primary water to blend to the VCT.

NOTE: A similar JPM to the above was performed during the 2008 NRC exam, but it wasperformed on the other unit, some different valve numbers, and entirely different valve locations.As a result this JPM is considered “Modified”.

3

Page 20: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ANALES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

Facility: 4’— awt+ Date of Examination: (u l2id Operating Test Number: I

Initials1. General Criteria

a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent withsampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

— 4_z_b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered ‘L .

during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1 .a.) t-fr’

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is withinacceptable limits. -.. ‘

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent -papplicants at the designated license level.

‘“

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:• initial conditions• initiating cues• references and tools, including associated procedures• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific

designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

— detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature— system response and other examiner cues— statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant— criteria for successful completion of the task— identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards— restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-throughoutlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance j’)criteria (e.g. item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specifiedon those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance withForm ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. .)

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor

NOTE: * The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.’# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c”; chief examiner concurrence required.

Page 21: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ANALES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

Facilty: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam:1/1 1/2010 Scenario Numbers: 2/5/8/1 Operating Test No.: 1

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials —

a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out •., ç4of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ‘2 AJ\

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. _ AJ(

3. Each event description consists of. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ‘1 j (. the expected operator actions (by shift position). the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario /j jS-without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. ‘2

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 12,, ‘6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain 4

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. V

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. /j? rCues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 1, ‘S(

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulatorperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated “) /7to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. —

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. 4,All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301, ‘1

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 j3, j(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). —

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events ‘ 7/7

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). ‘

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ‘i7 ./ M)

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Total malfunctions (5—8) 6/ 8 / 7 / 8 “s /72. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1—2) 2/4 / 2 / 3 1) /1/73. Abnormal events (2—4) 3/ 4 / 5 / 4 7, )3z

4. Major transients (1—2) 1/2 / 2 / 1 , /775. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1—2) 1/2 / 1 / 1 ‘ I/C6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0—2) 0/ 0 / 1 I 0 3, /777. Critical tasks (2—3) 3/ 2 / 2 / 2 j, ó/

Page 22: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

A E ScenariosP V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T MP E o IL N CREW CREW CREW POSITION

T N

I T POSITION POTION AI

C S A B S A B S A B L uA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P

TR lU

E

RX 1 1 1 3 110SRO1

NOR 1 1111

I/C 2,4 2,3 3,6 6 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 3,5 2,4 4 022

RX 1 1 2 110

SRO2 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1

I/C 2,7 2,3,5 4,5,9,10 6 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 2,4,5 3 0 2 2

RX 1 1 110RO1

NOR 1,51 3111

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 022

Instructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type;TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the “at-the-controls (ATC)” and “balance-of-plant(BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrumentor component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally servesin the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATCposition.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced withadditional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requireverifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimum requirementsspecified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

Page 23: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

A E ScenariosP V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T MP E IL N CREW CREW CREW POSITION T N

I T POSITION POTION AI

C SAB S A B S A B L uA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)M v 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P

R IUT P

E

RX 1 1 1 3 110SRO3

N OR 1 1 1 1 1

I/C 2,4 2,3 3,6 6 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 21

TS 3,5 2,4 4 0 2 2

RX 1 1 2 110

SRO4 NOR 1 1 2 1 11

I/C 2,7 2,3,5 4,5,9,10 6 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 21

TS 2,4,5 3 0 22

RX 1 1 110R02

NOR 1,51 3111

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 022

Instructions:

i Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type;TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC)” and “balance-of-plant(BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrumentor component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally servesin the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATCposition.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)but must be significant per Section C.2,a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced withadditional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requireverifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimum requirementsspecified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

Page 24: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

APPLICANTS

SRO1 X SRO2 X ROl X

Competencies — SCENARIO— SCENAR!P_ — — —

2(us) 5(RO) S(US) 2(RO) 5(US) 8(BOP) 2(BOP) 5(BOP) S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, 2,3, 4,5,6, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4,Events 6,7, 4 5,6, 6,7 4,5, 7,9,10 8 6,7,and Conditions 8 8 6 8

Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3,Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 6,10 6 3,5, 10 6,7

6,9 6,9

Operate Control 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,Boards (2) 3,6 3,7 6,7,9, 8,9 8,9 4,6,

10 7,8

Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,and Interact 3,6 4,5, 3,6, 5,6,7, 8 8,9 4,7,

6,7 7 9,10 8

Demonstrate 1,2, 1,3, 1,2,Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 4,5, 3,6,

8,9 6,7 7,9

Comply With and 3,5 2,4 2,4,Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5

Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ANAL

Page 25: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

APPLICANTS

SRO3 X SRO4 X R02 X

Competencies SCENARIO — SNARIO — SCENARIO — — — —

2(us) S(RO) 8(US) 2(RO) 5(US) S(BOP) 2(BOP) 5(BOP) S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, 2,3, 4,5,6, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4,Events 6,7, 4 5,6, 6,7 4,5, 7,9,10 8 6,7,and Conditions 8 8 6 8

Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3,Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 6,10 6 3,5, 10 6,7

6,9 6,9

Operate Control 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,Boards (2) 3,6 3,7 6,7,9, 8,9 8,9 4,6,

10 7,8

Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,and Interact 3,6 4,5, 3,6, 5,6,7, 8 8,9 4,7,

6,7 7 9,10 8

Demonstrate 1,2, 1,3, 1,2,

Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 4,5, 3,6,8,9 6,7 7,9

Comply With and 3,5 2,4 2,4,Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5

Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U,(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ANAL

Page 26: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

A E ScenariosP V BU(1) T MP E o IL N CREW POSITION

T N

I T S A B AC R T 0 L uA T 0 C P M(*)

Ro-INOR

MAJ 6 1 221

TS 3,4 2 022

RX 1 — 1 110

SRO-I NOR 1 1 1

X I/C 3,5 2 442

MAJ 6 1 2 21

TS 022

NOR 1

I/C 2,4,7,8,9 5 4 4 2

MAJ 6 1 221

TS 022

Instructions:

j Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each eventtype; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the “at-the-controls (ATC)” and “balance-of-plant (BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at leasttwo instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SROadditionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctionsrequired for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer toSection D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutionsmay be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requireverifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimum requirementsspecified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.

Page 27: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1

APPLICANTS

SRO-I X SRO-I X RO X

Competencies SCENARIO— SCENAR!2 — SCENARIP — —

BU BU BU

Interpret/Diagnose 3,5,6,7,8,9 3,5,6,7 2,4,7,8Eventsand Conditions

Comply With and 1,3,6,8,9 1,3,5,6 1,2,6Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control N/A 1,3,5,6 1,2,4,8Boards (2)

Communicate 1,6,8,9 1,3,5,6 1,2,4,6,and Interact 8

Demonstrate 1,3,6,8,9 N/A N/ASupervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 3,4 N/A N/AUse Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

FiNAL

Page 28: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 with Alternate Lineup

A E ScenariosP V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T MP E IL N CREW CREW CREW POSITION

T N

I T POSITION POSITION AI

C SABSA B S A B L uA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P

TR lU

ESRO1 RX 1 1 2 110X NOR 1 1 2111

I/C 2,4 2,3 4,5,9,10 5 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 3,5 2 022

RX 1 1 1 3 110

SRO2 NOR 1 1 1 1 1

X I/C 2,7 2,3,5 3,6 7 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 2,4,5 2,4 5 0 2 2

NOR 1__

1___

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS — 0 2 2

Instructions:

7’ 1 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type;TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the “at-the-controls (ATC)” and “balance-of-plant(BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrumentor component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally servesin the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATCposition.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced withadditional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requireverifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimum requirementsspecified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

fri

Page 29: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

[facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 with Alternate Lineup

A E Scenarios —

P V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T MP E I

L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION T N

I T POSITION POTION AC S A B S A B S A B L uA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)M v 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P

R lUT P

E

SRO3NOR 1 1

I/C 2,4 2,3 4,5,9,10 5 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 2 1

TS 3,5 2 022

RX 1 1 1 3 110

SRO4 NOR 1 1 1 1 1

X I/C 2,7 2,3,5 3,6 7 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 2,4,5 2,4 5 0 2 2

R02NOR 1__

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2

MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221

TS 022

Instructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type;TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC)” and ‘balance-of-plant(BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrumentor component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally servesin the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC

, position.

.Z6 Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced withadditional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requireverifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimum requirementsspecified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.

Page 30: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Corn petencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 w/AIt. Lineup

APPLICANTS

SRO1 X 5R02 X RO X

Competencies S9NARIO— — — —

2(us) 5(RO) 8(US) 2(RO) 5(US) S(80P) 2(BOP) 5(BOP) S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 4,5,6, 2,3, 2,3, 3,4,5, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4,Events 6,7, 4 7,9,10 6,7 4,5, 6,8 8 6,7,and Conditions 8 6 8

Comply Withand 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3,Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 10 6 3,5, 10 6,7

6,9 6,9

Operate Control 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,Boards (2) 3,6 6,7,9, 3,7 8,9 8,9 4,6,

10 7,8

Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3,4, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,and Interact 3,6 5,6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8 8,9 4,7,

9,10 7 8

Demonstrate 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,4,Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7

8,9 7,9

Comply With and 3,5 2,4, 2,4Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5

Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.

instructions:

Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

F i NAL

Page 31: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 w!Alt. Lineup

APPLICANTS

SRO3 X 5R04 X R02 X

Competencies — SCENARIO — — —

2us) 5(RO) S(US) 2(RO) 5(US) S(BOP) 2(BOP) 5(BOP) S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 4,5,6, 2,3, 2,3, 3,4,5, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4,Events 6,7, 4 7,9,10 6,7 4,5, 6,8 8 6,7,and Conditions 8 6 8

Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3,Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 10 6 3,5, 10 6,7

6,9 6,9

Operate Control 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,Boards (2) 3,6 6,7,9, 3,7 8,9 8,9 4,6,

10 7,8

Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3,4, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3,and Interact 3,6 5,6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8 8,9 4,7,

9,10 7 8

Demonstrate 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,4,Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7

8,9 7,9

Comply With and 3,5 2,4, 2,4Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5

Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

F9NAL

Page 32: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

AFT,ES-401, Rev. 9 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 ‘

Facility:— “-‘-‘CIQ Date of Exam: 2ó?,— .2o7 ‘)

RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only PointsTier Group

K KKI< KKAAIAAG A2 G* Total1 2 3 4 5 6 1 213 4 * Total

— — = = = = T = —-

i 3 18 3 3 6Emergency &

2 ‘ T ‘ 11 2 9 2 2 4Abnormal Plant — — — NIA—

N/A —

Evolutions TierTotals 4j 5 27 5 5 10

1 3 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 28 3 2 52.

2 1 1 1 11 1 0 11 1 1 10 1)1 / 3Plant — — —

Systems Tier Totals 4 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 38 4 3 8= = = = = C — — = C

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7Categories

3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2

1 Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the ROand SRO-oniy outlines (i.e., except for one category in TIer 3 of the SRO-only outline, the “Tier Totals”in each KIA category shalt not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier In the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by I from that specified in the tablebased on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that donot apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that arenot included on the outline should be added, Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regardingthe elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolutionin the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution,

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an Importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall beselected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7 generic (G) K/As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topicsmust be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics’ importanceratings (iRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enterthe group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in otherthan Category A2 or G on the SRO-only exam, enter It on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note# 1 does not apply). Use dupiicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs,and point totals(S) on Form ES-401 -3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55,43.

Page 33: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FaciIity:. Date of Exam: 2có— .2cc 7 ‘)

ES-401, Rev. 9 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2

RO K/A Category Points SRO-OnIy PointsTier Group —

— — — —— 1

KKKKKKAAAAG A2 I G* Total[ 1234561 234 * Total

= = = = = = = = = = —

3 3 3 3 3 3 18 3 3 6Emergency &

2 •T 2 1 1 2 9 2 2 4Abnormal Plant — — N/A N/A —

Evolutions Tier Totals 5 27 5 5 10= = = = = = = = = = =

1 323 311 23334 28 3 2 5

pi2a,it •2 11111101111 10 hi 1 3

Systems Tier Totals 4 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 38 4 3 8- = = = = = = = = =

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7Categories

-

3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2

1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the ROand SRO-oniy outlines (i.e., except for one category In Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the “Tier Totals’in each KIA category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by ±1 from that specified in the tablebased on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that donot apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that arenot included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regardingthe elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolutionin the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall beselected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7. *The generic (G) KIAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topicsmust be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importanceratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enterthe group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in otherthan Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note#1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from SectIon 2 of the KIA catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs,and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

Page 34: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

1G1

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2K

AN

AM

E/

SA

FE

TY

FU

NC

TIO

N:

IRK

1K

2K

3K

4K

5K

6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

ROS

f0007E

G2.1,19

Reactor

Trip

-S

tabilization-

Recovery

39

3.8-—

11H

1L

HJ

Ability

touse

plantcom

puterto

evaluatesystem

or/

1-

component

status.

OO

8AA

108

Pressu

rizerV

aporS

pace

Accident

133

83

8.i

rL

L_

11

CU

PR

Tlevel

pressu

reand

temp

erature

O11E

K3.14

Larg

eBreak

Lo

CA

/34.1

4.2H[l

HLi

LiU

HL1

HR

CP

frippingrequirement

015AK

2.08R

CP

Malfunctions

/42.6

2.6Hi

HH

LiH

HLI

LiLi

LIC

CW

S

022AA

1.08L

ossof

Rx

Coolant

Makeup

/23.4

3.3I

[ci

Liii

LiLi

ElV

CT

level

025AK

101

Loss

01R

HR

System

/4

39

43

rL

HLI

Li[_l

EL

ossof

RH

RS

duringalt

mo

des

ofoperation

026AK

3.02L

ossof

Com

ponentC

oolingW

ater/8

3.63.9

[]1

LiH

Hci

ElLI

ElH

ELT

heautom

aticactions

(alignments)

within

theC

CW

S--

resultingfrom

theactuation

ofthe

ES

FA

S

027AK

1.01

Pressurizer

Pressu

reC

ontrolS

ystem3.1

3.4H

1ci

LiH

H1

LID

efinitionof

saturationtem

peratureM

alfunction/3

038EG

24.18

Steam

Gen.

Tube

Rupture

/3

3.34.0

j-

HLi

El[I

HH

ZK

nowledge

ofthe

specificbases

forE

OP

s

055EA

1.06

Station

flacko

ut

/6

4.14

5[

LiLi

LIEl

LiLI

Restoration

ofpow

erw

ithone

ED

/G

056AK

lOt

Loss

of0ff-site

Pow

er/6

3.74.2

HLi

LiLi

LiLi

HH

IP

rincipleof

coolingby

naturalconvection

Page

1of

23/25/2009

11.17A

M

Page 35: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FOR

ME

S-401-2

Use

ofdc

controlpow

erby

DIG

s

Ability

toevaluate

plantperform

anceand

make

operationaljudgm

entsbased

onoperating

characteristics,reactor

behaviorand

instrument

interpretation.

HLi

[1F

ailurem

odesof

air-operatedequtpm

ent

JLI

IJG

eneratoroverheating

andrequired

actions

riLI

JJC

omponents,

andfunctions

ofcontrol

andsafety

systems,

includinginstrum

entation,signals,

interlocks,failure

modes,

andaulom

aticand

manual

features.

I[

Com

ponents,and

functionsof

controland

safetysystem

s,including

instrumentation,

signals,interlocks,

failurem

odes,and

automatic

andm

anualfeatures.

ES-401,

REV

9T

1G1

PWR

EXA

MIN

ATIO

NO

UTLIN

EK

AN

AM

E/ SA

FET

YFU

NC

TIO

N:

IRK

iK

2K

3K

4K

SK

6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

RO

Sf0

057AA

2.Ol

Loss

ofV

italA

CInst.

8us)6

3.73.8

LiLi

LILi

HH

Eli

LiLi

H

058AK

3.Ol

Lo

ssofo

CP

ow

er/6

3.43.7

HLI

‘iLi

HLI

LiLi

HH

LI

062AG

2.l.7L

ossof

Nuclear

Svc

Water/4

4.44.7

1LI

LILi

LILi

HLI

LiLi

TO

PiC:

Safety

injectiontank

pressu

reand

levelindicators

065AA

2.08L

ossof

Instrument

Air/S

2.93.3

LIH

ElLI

CH

Lil’I

077AA

2.lOG

eneratorV

oltageand

Electric

Grid

3.63.8

IIH

LiH

HH

FD

isturbancesI

6‘

-—

CE

O5E

K2.1

Steam

Line

Rupture

-E

xcessiveH

eat3.3

3.6r

iiH

LIH

HH

LIT

ransfer/

4

CE

06EK

2. 1L

ossof

Main

Feedw

ater/

43,3

3.7H

LiLi

LIEl

HLi

Page

2of

2312512009

11:17AM

Page 36: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

1G2

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2K

AN

AM

EI

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

1(1K

2K

31(4

1(51(6

Al

A2

A3

A4

(3T

OPIC

:flO

SR

O

003AG

2.1.28D

roppedC

ontrolR

od/

14,1

4.1Li

LILi

[IJi

LIH

LiLi

H;

Know

ledgeof

thepurpose

andfunction

ofm

ajorsystem

components

andcontrols.

028AK

1.01

Pressurizer

Level

Malfunction

/22.8

3.1ii..

Li[1

LiEl

HLi

H[1

LIU

PZR

referenceleak

abnormalities

032AK

1.01

Loss

ofS

ourceR

angeNI

/7

2.53.1

jLI

Li1

HI

ULI

[JU

Etlecls

ofvoltage

chan

ges

onperform

ance

036AA

1.02Fuel

Handling

Accid

ent/8

3.1Li

HH

[I

.iLi

LiLi

AR

Msystem

037AK

3.07S

teamG

eneratorT

ubeL

eak/3

4.24.4

HH

‘iH

IU

LILI

ElLi

LiA

ctionscontained

inE

OP

forS/G

tubeleak

051A

G2

43

Loss

ofC

ondenserV

acuumI

43

73

9Li

HI

IU

IiLi

LILi

]A

bililyto

identitypost

accidentinstw

mentation

060AA

2.02A

ccidentalG

aseou

sR

adwaste

Ret.

/9

3.14

iiLi

_JLI

-.

LiEl

LIT

hepossible

locationof

aradioactive-gas

leakw

iththe

—assistan

ceof

PE

O.

healthphysics

andchem

istrypersonnel

061AK

201A

RM

System

Alarm

s/7

2.52.6

1‘ILi

HEl

LiLi

LiLi

Detectors

ateach

AR

Msystem

location

CE

O9E

K3.3

Functional

Recovery

/N

one3.7

3.9i

ILi

:H

)LI

LILI

LI[L

Manipulation

ofcontrols

requiredto

obtaindesired

operatingresults

duringabnorm

al,and

emergency

situations.

Page

1of

13/25/2009

11:17AM

Page 37: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

2G1

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-40I-2K

AN

AM

E!

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

1(1K

21(3

K4

K5

1(6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

003K1.02

Reactor

Coolant

Pum

p2.6

2.81

LiLi

LiLi

LiLi

LiLI

LiLi

RC

Pm

otorcooling

andventilation

003K6.02

Reactor

Coolant

Pum

p2.7

3.1Li

iiLi

LiLi

IILi

LiLi

LIL]

RC

Pseals

andseal

water

supply-

004A4.05

Chem

icaland

Volum

eC

ontrol3.6

3.1Li

LiFL

LiH

LiLi

LIL

etdown

pressu

reand

temperature

controlvalves.

004G2.4.30

Chem

icaland

Volum

eC

ontrol2.7

4.1LI 1

LiLi

LILi

LiLI

flL]

LI[,

Know

ledgeof

eventsrelated

tosystem

operations/statusthat

must

bereported

tointernal

orginizationsor

outsideagencies.

005A1.07

Residual

Heal

Rem

oval2.5

3.1LI

LILi

ElLI

LiI

LiL

LiLI

Determ

inationof

testacceptability

bycom

parisonot

--

recordedvalve

respo

nse

times

with

Tech-S

pecrequirem

ents

0061(2.04E

mergency

Core

Cooling

3.63.8

LIFi

Li[I

ElEl

LiH

iiLi

LiE

SF

AS

-operatedvalves

007A4.09

Pressurizer

Rehef/Q

uenchT

ank2

52.7

LILI

LILi

LiLI

LII1

LIR

elationshipsbetw

eenP

ZR

leveland

changinglevels

of—

-_

.the

PR

Tand

bleedholdup

lank

008A4. 10

Com

ponentC

oolingW

ater3

13.1

ElLI

ElLI

LiLi

LIF1

Lil’1

II

Conditions

thatrequire

theoperation

ottw

oC

CW

coolers

008K4.01

Com

ponentC

oolingW

ater3.1

3.3LI

LiLi

1Li

LiLi

LiLI

El[

IA

utomatic

startof

standbypum

p

O1O

K1

08P

ressurizerP

ressureC

ontrol32

35

/El

LiH

ElF

II

IJ

PZR

LC

S

010K3

02P

ressurizerP

ressure

Control

40

41

[]Li

LI[1

II

LiR

PS

Pag

elo

t3

3/25/200911:17A

M

Page 38: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

2G1

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2N

AM

E/

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

Ki

K2

K3

K4

K5

K6

Al

A2

A3

A4

GT

OPIC

:

RO

SR

O

012A3.03

Reactor

Protection

3.4[1

LiLi

LILi

LiLi

LiF

1fl

Pow

ersupply

013A2

03E

ngineeredS

afetyF

eaturesA

ctuation4

4I

LILi

CI1

LF

IR

apiddepressurization

01

30

?.2.4

2E

ngineeredS

afetyF

eaturesA

ctuation3.9

4.6[1

LiLi

LiH

LIii

[1[1

LiA

bilityto

recognizesystem

parameters

thatare

entry-—

levelconditions

forT

echnicalS

pecifications

022A2

05C

ontainment

Cooling

31

iC

L.i

ir

1Li

[]

Mator

teakin

CC

S

026A1

01C

ontainment

Spray

39

42

HLi

‘I

I—

—i

Containm

entp

ressure

039G2.4.2

Main

andR

eheatS

team4.5

4.6Li

LiLi

LiLi

Liri

CLi

JK

nowledge

ofsystem

setpoints,

interlocksand

automatic

actionsasso

ciatedw

ithE

OP

entryconditions.

059A2.04

Main

Feedw

ater2.9

3.41

Li

LiLI

LiL.

IIbil

Li1

1J

Feeding

adry

S/G

059A3.03

Main

Feedw

ater2.5

26

7Li

LiLi

CC

LiLi

LiF

eedwater

pump

suctionflow

pressu

re

061K5

01A

uxiliary/Em

ergencyF

eedwater

36

39

Li—

CLi

1L1

Li[1

1R

elationshipbetw

eenA

FWflow

andR

CS

heattransfer

062G2.4.4

AC

Electrical

Distribution

4.54.7

LiH

Li[I

LiF1l

Ability

torecognize

abnormal

indicationsfor

system

-

--

--

-operating

parameters

which

areentry-level

conditionsfor

emergency

andabnorm

aloperating

procedures.

063K2

01D

CE

lectricalD

istribution2

93

1I r

11

—.j

LM

alorD

Cloads

Pag

e2

ot3

3/25/20091

117

AM

Page 39: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-401,

REV

9T2G

1PW

REX

AM

INA

TION

OU

TU

NE

FOR

ME

S-401-2K

AN

AM

E/

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

Ki

K2

K3

K4

K5

1(6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

0641(1.02E

mergency

Diesel

Generator

3.13

6E]

ELi

LiLI

LiLi

LILI

LiLi

DIG

coolingw

atersystem

0731(301P

rocess

Radiation

Monitoring

36

42

Li

ZL

iL

LI[I

CIC

flR

adioactiveeffluent

releases

0761(406

Service

Water

28

32

]Li

i—

iLI

[I1

CiLi

I1

Service

water

trainseparation

078A3

01Instrum

entA

ir3

13

2L

I[

Jr

I 1A

irpressure

0781(402

Instrument

Air

32

3LI

IILI

LiC

rossover

toother

airsy

stems

103K3

02C

ontainment

38

42

i’Li

LILI

LiC

[1Li

Loss

ofcontainm

entintegrity

undernorm

aloperations

Page3of3

3125/20091117A

M

Page 40: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

2G2

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2N

AM

E/

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

1(1K

2K

3K

41(5

1(6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

0011(3.02C

ontrolR

odD

rive3.4

3.5L

iH

LILi

Hii

IiH

LILi

F1CS

0021(409

Reactor

Coolant

32

32

LiLI

LiL

LIL

HH

LiO

perationot

loopisolation

valves

0161(106

Non-nuclear

Instrumentation

3.6Li

LiLi

HL

HLI

Liri

LIA

FWsystem

0171(601In

coreT

emperature

Monitor

27

30

i1

IILi

ILi

LIH

F1

Sen

sors

anddetectors

0271(501C

onlainment

IodineR

emoval

31

LLI

LiH

‘1I

ILI

LiLi

Purpose

ofcharcoal

tillers

028K2

01H

ydrogenR

ecombiner

andP

urge2

528

Lii

LiLi

iI

IF

Hydrogen

recombiners

Control

029A3

01C

ontainment

Purge

38

40

flLi

HLi

HLi

LILi

LiIL

CP

Sisolation

041A

2.02S

teamD

ump/T

urbineB

ypassC

ontrol3.6

39

LiH

LiH

I’1.

LIS

teamvalve

stuckopen

075A4.0l

Circulating

Water

3.23.2

LiH

LIIL

LiIii

HII

H:E

mergency/essential

SW

Spum

ps

086G2.4.18

FireP

rotection3

34.0

LiL

Li rir

11

LiLi

HK

nowledge

ofthe

specificbases

forE

OP

s.

Page

loll

3/25/200911.17

AM

Page 41: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9T

3PW

RE

XA

MIN

AT

ION

OU

TL

INE

FOR

ME

S-401.2

KA

NA

ME

ISA

FET

YFU

NC

TIO

N:

IR1(1

K2

K3

K4

KS

K6

Al

A2

A3

A4

GTO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

G2.l.1

9C

onductof

operations3.9

3.811

rLi

Hi

II

LiLi

LiLi

Ability

touse

plantcom

puterto

evaluatesystem

or-

-com

ponentstatus.

G2,1

3-4C

onductof

operations2.7

3.5r

iL

ILi

LiLI

[IiLI

Know

ledgeof

primary

andsecondary

chemistry

limits

(32.1.4C

onductof

operations3.3

3.8I

III

II

II

LiLi

LILi

LiK

nowledge

ofindividual

licensedoperator

responsibilitiesrelated

toshill

staffing,such

asm

edicalrequirem

ents.T

ho-solooperation,

maintenance

ofactive

licensestatur,

IOC

FR

55etc.

(32.2.35E

quipment

Control

3.64.5

[1Li

HLi

LIi

ILH

LIfl

Ability

todeterm

ineT

echnicalS

pecificationM

odeof

Operation

(32.2.43E

quipment

Control

30

3-3Li

LIH

LiH

LILi

HLi

Know

ledgeof

thepro

cessu

sedto

trackinoperable

alarms

(32.3.13R

adiationC

ontrol3.4

3.8LII

[1Li

HLi

LEl

LiLi

iK

nowledge

ofradiological

safetyprocedures

pertainingto

licensedoperator

duties

(323

6R

diat,o

nC

ontrol2

038

J.Z

LIL

LiLI

H11

HLi

[iA

bilityto

aproverelease

permits

G2

418

Em

ergencyP

rocedures/Plans

33

40

HLi’

LI1

H[1

.Li

lv’K

nowledge

ofthe

specificbases

forE

OP

s

02

43

Em

ergencyP

rocedures/Plans

3H

ILI

[i

jII

LIEl

[]{]

Ability

toidentity

postaccident

instrumentation

G2

46

Em

ergencyP

rocedures/Plans

37

47

LiI

iL

iLI

[1LI

]K

nowledge

symptom

based

EO

Pm

itigationstrategies

Page

loll

3/25/20091117A

M

Page 42: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9S

RO

T1G

1PW

RE

XA

MIN

AT

ION

OU

TL

INE

FOR

ME

S-401-2

KA

NA

ME

ISAFE

TY

FUN

CT

iON

:IA

Ki

K2

1(31(4

K5

1(6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

HO

SR

O

007EG

2.4.20R

eactorT

rip-

Stabilization-

Recovery

3.84

3Li

LiLi

El1

Ell

[1[j

Know

ledgeof

operationalim

plicationsof

EO

Pw

arnings,/

1cautions

andnotes.

009EA

2.14S

mall

Break

LO

CA

I33.8

LiLI

Liri

ElLi

Li[l

HLi

1A

ctionsto

betaken

ifP

TS

limits

areviolated

022AA

2.04L

ossof

RC

oolantM

akeup/2

2.93.8

[]LI

LiLI

LIL

lL

Li

LIH

owlong

PZR

levelcan

bem

aintainedw

ithinlim

its

058AG

2.2.4L

ossof

DC

Pow

er!6

3.63.6

ElLI

LiEl

LiJ

Iji

(multi-unit)

Ability

toexplain

thevariations

incontrol

-

-board

layouts,system

s,instrum

entationand

proceduralactions

between

unitsat

afacility.

062AA

2.05L

ossof

Nuclear

Svc

Water!

42.4

2.5LI

LiE

Li

ElI

HLi

LiT

henorm

alvalues

forS

WS

-headerflow

rateand

theflow

ratesto

thecom

ponentscooled

bythe

SW

S

065AG

2.4.50L

ossof

Instrument

Air/S

4.24.0

LiLi

[i1

LIrIii

IIA

bilityto

verifysystem

alarmsetpoints

andoperate

-controls

identiliedin

thealarm

respo

nse

manual.

Pag

e1

of1

3/25/200911:17

AM

Page 43: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9SF10

T1G

2PW

RE

XA

MIN

AT

ION

OU

TL

INE

FOR

ME

S.401-2

KA

NA

ME

ISA

FET

YFU

NC

TIO

N:

IRK

iK

2K

3K

4K

5K

6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

033AA

2.09L

oss01

Intermediate

Range

NI/

73.4

3.7H

[1fl

HH

LiLi.

ILI

Conditions

which

allowbypass

ofan

intermediate-range

leveltrip

swftch

067AG

24.21

Plant

FireO

n-site)9

84

04.6

111

HH

IH

LiLi

HH

Know

ledgeof

theparam

etersand

logicused

toassess

thestatus

ofsafety

functions

074EG

2.2.40m

ad.C

oreC

ooling/

43.4

HH

.iH

LILi

LiLI

:1A

bilityto

applytechnical

specificationsfor

asystem

.

076AA

2.04H

ighR

eactorC

oolantA

ctivity/

92.6

31

HH

LILI

LiLI

ilLi

C.ij

Pro

cesseffluent

radiationchart

recorder

Pag

e1

of1

3/25/200911:17

At1

Page 44: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9S

RO

T2G

1PW

RE

XA

MIN

AT

ION

OU

TL

INE

FOR

ME

S-401-2

KA

NA

ME

/SA

FET

YFU

NC

TIO

N:

IR1(1

1(2K

31(4

K5

K6

Al

A2

A3

A4

GT

OPIC

:R

OS

RO

003G2

132

Reactor

Coolant

Pum

p3.8

4.0Li

iiI

LiLi

Li[

LiLi

1IA

bilityto

explainand

applyall

systemlim

itsand

precautions.

010A2

01P

ressurizerP

ressure

Control

33

36

LiLi

LLi

Li

[jH

eaterfailures

012G2.4.31

Reactor

Protection

4.24.1

HLi

LiH

[1K

nowledge

ofannunciators

alarms,

indicationsor

responseprocedures

063A2.01

DC

Electrical

Distribution

25

3.2LI

iiLi

H[.

HEl

[1G

rounds

076A2.01

-S

erviceW

ater3.5

3.7[1

Li[1

LiH

H[1

Loss

ofS

WS

Page

1cit

3/25/20091117

AM

Page 45: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9SH

OT

2G2

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2K

AN

AM

EI

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

Ki

K2

K3

1<4K

5K

6A

lA

2A

3A

4G

TO

PIC:

RO

SR

O

027A2.01

Containm

entIodine

Rem

oval3.0

3.31

LiLi

LILi

LiEu

i[1

LiLi

High

temperature

inthe

tillersystem

029G2

418

Containm

entP

urge33

40

LiE

I)E

u_LI

LiL

LI

Know

ledgeof

thespecific

bases

br

EO

Ps

034K4

03Fuel

Handling

Equipm

ent2

63

3—

flLi

LICl

LIi

LiO

verloadprotection

Page

lofi

3/25/200911:17A

M

Page 46: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

EV

9S

RO

T3

PWR

EX

AM

INA

TIO

NO

UT

LIN

EFO

RM

ES

-401-2K

AN

AM

E/

SAFE

TY

FUN

CT

ION

:IR

KI

1(2K

3K

41(5

K6

Al

A2

A3

A4

GT

OPIC

:R

OS

RO

G2

11C

onductof

operations3.8

4.2Li

LILi

LiLI

ElEl

Ti

[1L

]K

nowledge

ofconduct

otoperations

requirements.

G2. 1.9

Conduct

ofoperations

2.94.5

1LI

LILI

ElLI

ElLi

LIfl

[j

Ability

todirect

personnelactivities

insidethe

Control

room.

G2.2.17

Equipm

entC

ontrol2.6

3.8[

iLi

ElLI

LiLI

LILi

ElLI

‘iK

nowledge

ofthe

processb

rm

anagingm

aintenance-

activitiesduring

powe

operations.

G2.2.43

Equipm

entC

ontrol3.0

3.3LL

LILI

LiLi

LiLi

12LI

Li[l

Know

1ed

ofthe

pro

cessused

totrack

inoperablealarm

s

G2

311

Radiation

Control

38

43

LLI

LiLi

Li—

-LI

LILI

jA

bitityto

controlradiation

releases

G2.4.19

Em

ergencyP

rocedures/Plans

34

4.1H

Li[LI

IiLI

ElLI

[1Li

LiF

Know

ledgeof

EO

Playout,

symbols

andicons.

G2

4.39E

mergency

Procedures/P

lans3.9

3.8Li

LIF

]LI

LiLi

Li[

HLi.

Know

ledgeof

theFlO

’sresponsibilities

inem

ergencyplan

implem

entation.

Page

1of

13/25/2009

11:17AM

Page 47: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ANAL

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4

Tier / Randomly Selected Reason for RejectionGroup K/A

T2G2 002K4.09 St. Lucie doe not have loop isolation valves

(Ques. 57) Replaced with 002K4,10

T1G2 033AA2.09 St. Lucie does not have intermediate range NI’s (SRO)

(Ques. SRO 82) Replaced with 033AA2.07

Replace second time with 0037AA2.10

Ti G2 O32AK1 .01 Source range Ni’s not voltage variable

(Dues. 21) Replaced with 032AA2.09

T3 G2.3.6 K/A less than 2.5 (2.0) for RD exam

(Ques. 72) Replaced with G2.3.4

T2G1 007A4.09 PSL has no bleed holdup tank

(Ques. 34) Replaced with 007A4.i0

T2G2 075A4.01 No relationship between Circ water and SWS pumps

(Ques. 64) Replaced with 075A2.01

T1G1 057AA2.0i SI tank instrumentation is not off Instrument bus at PSL. Power issupplied from Power Panel from Motor Control Center

(Ques. 12) Replaced with 057AA2.04

T2G2 029G2.4.18 Containment Purge: Knowledge of specific bases for EOP’s. ThisK/A is very similar to 027A2.0l from T2G2 Containment IodineRemoval: High temperature in the filter system. Recommendchanging 029G2.4.18 due to containment purge is used for H2removal in the EOP’s and same containment purge has iodineremoval charcoal filters which would be used in EOP’s. To meetboth K/A’s, question would have to be similar.

(Ques. SRO 92) Replaced with 029G2.4.50

T3 G2.4.39 Emergency Procedures/Plans: Knowledge of the RD’sresponsibilities in emergency plan implementation. Cannot writequestion and meet ‘Guidelines for SRD only Questions’ Rev. 0

(Ques. SRQ 100) Replaced with G2.4.30

T3 G2.2.43 Same KA for RD and SRO exam. Recommend change RD examKA

(Ques. 70) Replaced with G2.2.39

7/13/2009

Page 48: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4

Tier / Randomly Selected Reason for Rejection

Group KJA

T1G2 051AG2.4.3 No relationship to loss of Condenser Vacuum and post-accident

instrumentation.

(Ques. 24) Replaced with 051AG2.4.35Replaced due to conflict with 007A4.1 0 Recognition of leakingTIGI OO8AAI.08 PORV/code safety (Ques. 34)

(Ques. 2) Replaced with OO8AA1 .06

T2GI 004G2.4.30 Unable to write a discriminatory question. Replaced with004G2.4.31

(Ques. 31)

7/13/2009

Page 49: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

FINALES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam: 12/09 Exam Level: RD SRO

Initial

Item Description a b* c

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 2 4 f4_4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RD or 2 SRO questions were

repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR CL program office).

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; orX the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

the examinations were developed independently; orthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; orother (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New

new or modified); enter the actual RD / SRD-only 19 / 2 I 4 / 2 I 52 / 21from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest I Iquestion distribution(s) at right. I I

25% / 8% I 5% / 8% 69% / 84%

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD Memory C/Aexam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; Ithe SRD exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 36 / 11 I 39 / 14selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels, enter Ithe actual RD / SRO question distribution(s) at right. 48% / 44% 52% / 56%

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examinationoutline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. A)—

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correctand agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

a. Author Larry Richb. Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Regional Supervisor

ure DatecIi

Note: * The facility reviewer’s initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column ‘c”; chief examiner concurrence required.

FINAL

Page 50: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

ST.

LU

CIE

INITIA

LD

RA

FTR

EV

IEW

nstructions[R

eferto

Section

Dof

ES-401

andA

ppendixB

foradditional

information

regardingeach

ofthe

following

concepts.1

1.E

nterthe

levelof

knowledge

(LOK

)of

eachquestion

aseither

(F)undam

entalor

(H)igher

cognitivelevel.

Enter

thelevel

ofdifficulty

(LO

D)

ofeach

questionusing

a1

—5

(easy—

difficult)rating

scale(questions

inthe

2—

4range

areacceptable).

Check

theappropriate

boxifa

psychometric

flawis

identified:

•T

hestem

lackssufficient

focusto

elicitthecorrect

answer

(e.g.,unclear

intent,m

oreinform

ationis

needed,or

toom

uchneed

lessinform

ation).•

The

stemor

distractorscontain

cues(i.e.,

clues,specific

determiners,

phrasing,length,

etc).•

The

answer

choicesare

acollection

ofunrelated

true/falsestatem

ents.•

The

distractorsare

notcredible;

singleim

plausibledistractors

shouldbe

repaired,m

orethan

oneis

unacceptable.•

One

orm

oredistractors

is(are)

partiallycorrect

(e.g.,ifthe

applicantcan

make

unstatedassum

ptionsthat

arenot

contradictedby

stem).

Check

theappropriate

boxifa

jobcontent

erroris

identified:•

The

questionis

notlinked

tothe

jobrequirem

ents(i.e.,

thequestion

hasa

validK

/Abut,

asw

ritten,is

notoperational

incontent).

•T

hequestion

requiresthe

recallof

knowledge

thatis

toospecific

forthe

closedreference

testm

ode(i.e.,

itis

notrequired

tobe

known

fromm

emory).

•T

hequestion

containsdata

with

anunrealistic

levelof

accuracyor

inconsistentunits

(e.g.,panel

meter

inpercent

with

questionin

gallons).•

The

questionrequires

reverselogic

orapplication

compared

tothe

jobrequirem

ents.

5.C

heckquestions

thatare

sampled

forconform

ancew

iththe

approvedK

/Aand

thosethat

aredesignated

SR

O-only(K

JAand

licenselevel

mism

atchesare

unacceptable).

Based

onthe

reviewer’s

judgment,

isthe

questionas

written

(U)nsatisfactory

(requiringrepair

orreplacem

ent),in

needof

(E)ditorial

enhancement,

or(S

)atisfactory?

1.A

ta

minim

um,

explainany

“U”

ratings(e.g.,

howthe

Appendix

Bpsychom

etricattributes

arenot

beingm

et).

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OKL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

Partial

Job-M

inutia#/

Back-

0=

SR

OU

/EJS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

eneric

Com

ments:

1.T

healignm

entof

eachquestion

appears

differently.W

hatI am

sayingis

thatthe

distractorsshould

bealigned

tothe

leftand

belowthe

stemof

thequestion.

2.M

akesure

allstem

bulletsare

thesam

e,have

periodsat

theend.

3.C

hangethe

word

“states”to

“identifies”in

questionstem

.

4.A

ddparenthesis

forall

nounnam

esof

proceduresas

well

asvalve

andequipm

entnam

es.

5.M

akea

tableof

contentsfor

eachexam

sreferences

thatw

illbe

handedto

theapplicants,

RO

andS

RO

sothis

canbe

usedfor

theA

DA

MS

submittal

instead

ofthe

actualhandout.

>07EG

2.1.19,N

ew,

Mem

oryl2F

2-35

)uestionap

pears

tobe

Ok

Page 51: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#LO

KL

OD

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

/E/S

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

O8A

A1.06,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

Be

consistentw

iththe

useof

periodsin

eachof

theitem

sin

theinitial

:onditions.

sklicensee

if,this

isan

RO

knowledge

levelquestion.

It appears

tobe

a

2H

3x

asisof

theprocedure.

Iftheystate

itis

Ok,

leaveit,

ifnot

thenneed

sto

‘echanged.

)therwise

it app

earsto

beok.

S•hursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

Licensee/O

perationsstate

Ok

forR

O

11EK

3.14,B

AN

K,

NR

C2001

PSLE

xam,

CA

,U

nit1

Distractors

Dthe

secondpart

doesnot

seemplausible,

neitherdo

esJistractor

A

How

aboutchanging

Ato

readas

thelast

partof

Cand

0to

readom

ethinglike

answer

inB

.T

hisw

ayw

ew

illonly

havetw

othought

inach

itemto

concentrateon

andnot

all4

asit is

now.

A.

ALL

RC

Ps

toenhance

RC

Sheat

removal.

B.A

llR

CP

sdue

toloss

ofR

CP

NPSH

.

3H

2-3X

C.

ON

ER

CP

ineach

loopto

enhanceR

CS

heatrem

oval.

D.

ON

ER

CP

dueto

reducedR

CP

NPSH

.

What

doyou

thinkof

this?

Fhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

53eneric

Reference

sto

beprovided

1A

and1

B.O

Kfor

thereference.

Was

notoriginally

onthe

question.

Discussion

ofthe

distractorsfrom

above.A

cceptedthe

recomm

ended.

)Kw

ithchanges.

)15AK

2.08,N

EW

,C

/A

Vhile

thestem

asks

in1)

what

has

closedthe

HC

V-1

4-11 B

i.the

secondloes

notillicitthe

answer

inthe

secondpart

ofeach

answer

thatstates

Override

and...

(distractorsB

andD

)T

hisneed

sto

beclearer

onw

hatis

beingoverridden.

hedistractor

speakingabout

High

radiationIs

notas

validas

itcouldbe.

4H

2-3x

Joreference

was

providedconcem

ingthe

High

Rad

signaland

howm

anyugh

radsignals

neededto

cause

anisolation.

Fixis

toadd

avalue

thatrepresents

highrad

butnot

highenough

torigger

theisolation

ofH

CV

-14-11B1.

WN

OTc

Ibis.S

B

reviewed

PS

LO

PS

0702209R08.doc,

anditdoes

notidentify

what

itakes

tocau

sethe

isolation.D

iscussw

ithlicensee.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Page 52: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3._P

sychometric

Flaws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

Partial

Job-M

inutia#/

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

/E/S

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

dded

thevalve

number

asabove,

HC

V14

11B

ito

Band

D.

(alveO

NL

Ycloses

onhigh

temp

NO

Tradiation.

22AA

1.08,

Modified

Bank,

Unit

1

Please

changein

thestem

thesym

bol,that

lookslike

it means

itis

steady,unless

thisis

anorm

alsym

bolused

inall

previousexam

inations.T

heam

egoes

forthe

down

signal.It w

ouldbe

betterto

usew

ords.le.,

teady,dow

n,etc.

5H

3E

)therwise

itappears

tobe

Ok.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Dhanged

thearrow

s.

)Kas

changed.

)25Ak1.01,

Bank

2149,U

nit2?

Need

some

clarificationw

itha

drawing

tosee

what

isbeing

done.

Distractors

Aand

Bare

oppositesof

eachother.

Dan

distractorsC

andD

bedone

todo

thesam

e?D

on’tbelieve

thatlistractor

Dis

plausible.P

ressurizerand

Hot

leg?Interaction

do

esnot

nakesen

se,no

distractoranalysis

done,only

statesits

incorrect.D

iscussvhy

Dis

plausible?

If Cis

reversed,is

thisalso

anansw

er?S

eems

so.

flhyis

theprocedure

notidentified

inthe

stem?

Inaccordance

with

(lAW

)-N

OP

-01.04

6F

2-3Is

theinform

ationin

thestem

ALL

necessary

??

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

,ddedprocedure

tothe

stem.

Rew

rotethe

questionsas

follows:

Jhat

shutdown

coolingloop

isin

operation?R

equiresA

trainoperating

indB

instandby.

Ifloss

ofS

DC

would

occurW

OO

TF

conditionscould

resultin

RC

Siressurization

andloss

ofinventory.

Rew

ordedE

AC

Hdistractor.

ppears

tobe

Ok

asdiscussed.

Page 53: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

/EJS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

)26AK

3.02,N

ew,

Mem

ory,B

othU

nits

fJhilethe

information

providedidentifies

thata

DB

AL

OC

Ais

thebasis

forhe

CC

Wflow

,this

isreally

notidentified

inthe

two

distractors.Is

itiecessary

toadd

thatto

Aand

C?

Itwould

seemappropriate.

Ask

7F

2-3licensee.

rhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Replaced

LO

CA

with

DB

Afor

Aand

C.

)K)27AK

1.01,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

)27AK

1.01,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1,(cent.)

Fhestem

uses

“initially,”does

thishave

tobe

defined?Itm

ighthelp

tow

oidcom

ments

inthe

end.

8H

Use

thew

ordsrather

thanthe

arrows.

82-3

Sep

aratethe

distractorsA

BC

andD

fromthe

arrows.

Cont.

H)therw

iseap

pears

tobe

Ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

sT

hangedW

hatw

illbe

theFIR

STeffect

willthis

failure....

ot

ridof

thearrow

s.R

eplacedw

ithR

isingand

Low

ering.

)Kas

changed.

)38EG

2.4.18,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit2

Inthe

stem,

putthe

words

closefuses

inquotes,

“closefuses.”

9F

2ppears

tobe

Ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

Decided

toput

quotesaround

closeinstead

ofw

hatw

assuggested

above.Itw

illnow

read“close”

fuses....

)55EA

1.06,B

ank1

07&

75

9,

CA

,U

nit1

Theinform

ationfor

theU

NIT

1P

ermissive

light,is

imm

aterialfor

thisluestion,

sincethe

Unit

1light

foreach

distractoris

ON

.T

hisinform

ationan

berem

ovedfrom

thestem

.O

R

Thange

distractorsC

andD

tohave

Unit

1to

beO

FF.T

hatw

aythe

10H

3X

ipplicanth

asto

figureout

which

was

theperm

issivelight

hasto

be.

•hisw

ouldbe

abetter

way

todo

it,

)and

Dshould

readU

nit1

OFF,

Unit

2O

N,

--this

way

itis

oppositeof

heansw

er.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Thanged

asrequested.

OK

with

change.

Page 54: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

0D(F/H

)(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

PartialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

JSE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

)56AK

1.01,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit2

KA

statement

onthe

questionstates

natural“circulation,”

however,

theK

Aatalo

gstates

natural“convection.”

Isthis

questionw

ithinthe

knowledge

requirement

ofan

RO

,in

that,the

urequirem

entto

knowthat

thesafety

functionfor

bothE

DG

5not

runningis

NO

Tbeing

met?

ASK

Licensee

if theybelieve

thisis

Ok.

Ifnot,

change.

rhelicensee

identifiesthat

openingthe

PO

RV

(AD

V)

will

enh

ance

theiatural

circulationsthe

GR

EA

TE

ST

,w

hilethis

isstated

inthe

answer,

itis

H\

iotidentified

inthe

referencem

aterial.L

icenseestates

thisis

GF

ES

2-3X

INFO

\lso,T

hereis

nojustification

forsingle

ortw

oph

aseflow

.W

hatindications

providedin

thestem

would

indicatethat

two

ph

aseflow

was

11)resent?

This

doesnot

seemplausible.

Need

touse

temp

andpressure

odeterm

inesubcooling,

thisw

illthen

determine

singleor

two

ph

aseflow

.

HIfthere

issubcooling

thereis

singleph

aseflow

.A

pplicantsw

illhave

steam2-3

Xables

andfigure

1A.

Fheprocedures

name

indistractors

Cand

Dis

differentthan

theactual

rocedure.C

apitalizethe

word

EF

FE

CT

inth

esedistractors

becau

seit

isart

ofthe

proceduresnam

e.M

adethe

procedurenam

ein

caps.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

Theydo

expectR

Oto

knowledge.

IFyou

don’thave

DG

srunning,

then‘ou

don’thave

maintenance

ofvital

aux..

See

abovein

blue.

Thanges

OK

.

)57AA

2.04,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

.N

OT

question,should

beused

sparingly.O

Kfor

thisone.

12F

35

.pp

earsto

beO

k.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10.

2009

ik

jj)58A

K3.01,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

Distractors

Cand

Dare

missing

theperiods.

13F

2-3X

..

.

Vhy

isitexpected

thatdistractors

Aand

Bare

plausible?W

hatnform

ationis

providedin

thestem

thatw

ouldindicate

thata

SIAS

orL

oopccurred?

This

makes

these

2distractors

implausible.

Page 55: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LOK

LC

D(F/H

)(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

PartialJob-

Minutia

#/B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

ISE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

)hangedthe

entirequestion.

uesday,July

13,2010.

11:13A

M

Replacem

entquestion.

SR

eplacement

questionap

pears

tobe

Ok.

62AG

2.1.7,B

ank3284,

Mem

oryU

nit2

Re

write

thestem

tostate:

Priorto

reducingturbine

load,W

OO

TF

(which

oneof

thefollow

ing)w

illave

theG

RE

AT

ES

Tim

pactin

maintaining

availableheat

removal

14F

2-3apacity?

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

ST

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Used

recomm

endation.

65AA

2.08,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit2

dd

thepercent

symbol

(%)

behindthe

70in

thestem

,should

be70%

.

han

ge

thequestion

toread,

IfInstrum

entA

ircontinues

tolow

er,W

OO

TF

lantresp

on

sesis

expected?(A

ssume

NO

Operator

actionsare

taken)15

H3

hisis

thesam

eas

aprevious

question.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

ccepted

suggestion.

)K,

changeis

toare.

)77AA

2.10,M

odifiedN

RC

Exam

PS

L2008

Question

18,C

A,

Unit

1

Instem

is60

MV

AR

Slag

outredundant

forlag

only?Is

thisteaching?

Dan

itbesaid

thatthe

unitcanonly

maintain

pressureat

45psia

viceav

ing

problems?

S?

rhecurve

provideddoes

notidentify

statorw

indingor

rotorw

indingover

eating,

it justidentifies

rotoror

statorheating.

Isthis

thesam

e?A

skL

icensee?

Meets

requirements

form

odification.16

H3

)therwise

appears

tobe

Ok

Fhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Rem

ovedthe

word

“out.”S

)nlyable

tom

aintain45

psisH

ydrogenpressure.

Rem

ovedw

indingfrom

eachof

thefirst

partsof

eachdistractor.

Page 56: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

1.2.

3.P

sychometric

Flaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D—

——

—(F/H

)(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

PartialJob-

Minutia

#/B

ack-Q

SR

OU

1E1SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

JAO

nly

E0

5E

K2

.1,

New

,C

A,

Unit

2

dd

thew

ord“the”

priorto

2ASIG

.A

ddto

theIC

priorto

thebullets,

“The

ollowing

conditionsnow

exist.”In

thestem

,change

“states”to

“identities”o

make

clearer.

Ineach

distractor,sep

arateeach

lineout

sothat

thetw

othoughts

will

be,asier

read.C

urrentlythe

distractorsare

veryhard

toread.

\llB

UT

distractor“C”

identifiesM

SISC

hannel“A”

asbeing

activated.In

)this

shouldbe

thesam

e.C

hangethe

format

ofthe

questionto

pullout

hecom

mon

part,ie

MSIS

Channel

Ahas

actuatedand

putitin

thefront

17H

3)fthe

question.T

hisw

ayyou

don’thave

tocontinually

readthis

tatement.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

.ddedto

stem—

The

following

conditionsnow

exist.

Indistractor

Citis

missing

Channel

A.

Will

SEN

Dto

bereview

ed.

suesday,

July

13,2010.

111

3A

M

)hangesare

ok.

E05E

K2.1,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

118

F3

Sppears

tobe

Ok.

19F

35

Use

comm

asand

quotesas

appropriate.

pp

earsto

beO

k

20H

3S

pp

earsto

beO

k

21F

2-3..,

pp

earsto

beok

22H

3D

oyou

needto

addthe

RC

-XX

-XX

number

also,or

isitenough

tojust

iavethe

GA

G-X

XX

number?

dd

thew

ord“IF”

priorto

“atthesam

etim

e..

Page 57: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

——

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

1EJSE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

)therwise

app

earsto

betine.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

)Kas

is.A

ndaccepted

theIF

above.

)37AK

3.07,B

ank2259,

CA

,U

nit1

Distractors

Cand

Dcan

bedisqualified

imm

ediatelyb

ecause

theyare

,tN

OT

lessthan

the930

psiam

aximum

valuelisted

instep

11of

EO

P-04.

Thanged

Cand

Dto

840to

890w

hichis

50psig

abovew

ithno

below.

Thestem

isN

OT

clear,in

that,the

stemis

notclear

where

inthe

rocedureyou

aretrying

tocontrol

RC

Spressure.

Information

shouldbe

rovidedthat

indicatesthat

theplant

isabout

toD

epressurizethe

RC

S,n

d.

23H

3This

bandshould

bechanged

sothat

thehighest

number

forR

CS

ressureis

am

aximum

of930

psia.D

iscussw

ithlicensee

tom

akelearer

what

isbeing

asked.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10.

2009

Instem

RC

Sdepressurization

)Kas

changed

151AG

2.4.35,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Ineach

distractor,use

separate

linesfor

eachansw

er.S

eparatedthem

mange

theterm

inologyused

inC

andD

from“T

heH

oggingejector

isxperiencing

Ejector

Stalling.”T

o,“T

heH

oggingejector

exhaustexhibits

ndicationof

ejectorstalling.”

Accepted.

24F

2-3en

erically,

inthe

stem,

identifythe

nounnam

esfor

allthe

valvesused

here,so

when

theyare

usedin

eachdistractor

thenthe

valvenum

bercan

eused.

V16203

hasno

nounnam

e.Included.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

ccepted

asstated

above.O

Kas

changed.

J60A

A2.02,

Bank

3314,C

A,

Unit

1

Handout

neededfor

exam.

OK

Idonot

believethat

thesecond

partsof

distractorsA

andD

areplausible

ecause

theydo

notisolate

V6565

which

isstated

inthe

ICthat

theIC

VG

DT

isused

todo

therelease.

Because

ofthis

I eliminated

these

as

25H

3X

lausible.W

hyw

ouldanyone

pickthis

ifitdidn’t

isolatethe

release?A

skicensee.

Theexplanation

forA

do

esnot

make

sense

tom

e!IF

theline

upis

justto

heA

andC

tank,how

do

esthe

Btank

getthe

dischargeto

fromthe

tasteg

ascom

pressor?A

sklicensee,

howam

Iseeingthis

incorrectly?

Replace

distractorsA

andD

.

Page 58: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-4

01

,R

ev.

9W

ritten

Exam

ination

Review

Worksheet

Form

ES

-4

01

-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

SR

OU

/EJSE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.L

inkunits

ward

K/A

Only

uesd

ay,

July13,

2010,11:13A

M

SN

ewquestion

replacedold

one.

tlooks

likethere

isa

periodin

thethird

bullet(solid)

after.

..Stop

valve”dditionally,

acom

ma

isneeded

afterthe

V6565

inthe

same

bullet.

Distractors

areO

K.

Distractor

Band

Dneed

periodsat

theend

ofeach

andD

istractorC

onlyeed

sone,

thereare

2.

be

chan

ges

make

thisquestion

Ok

61A

K2.01,

Modified

Bank

652,M

emory,

Unit

1

sthe

answer

Dsupposed

tobe

Channel

Dor

channelB

?A

sklicensee.

seems

likeitshould

beB.

26F

2-35

)therwise

app

earsto

beok.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

ccepted

andchanged

distractorD

andm

adeitB.

)kE0

9E

K3

.3,

Bank

1951),M

emory,

Unit

1

Dom

mas

andquotes

where

appropriate.

Dhange

answer

toread

Either

1Aor

1BL

PSIpum

pthrough

Hot

Leg

injection.A

sitstates

inthe

procedure.27

F3

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

Ihursday,S

eptember

10,2009

cceptedas

written

above

)Kchanged.

28F

2-35

\ppears

tobe

Ok

)03K6,02,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

29F

2-35

Dom

mas

andquotes

asappropriate

\pp

earsto

beO

k.

30H

2-3—

J)04A

4.05,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

Page 59: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#LO

KL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

PartialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E/S

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

nsold

pressurecontrol,

what

isthe

positionof

PC

V-2201?

Isthis

actuallyn

auto?Itis

actuallyin

AU

TO

.D

onot

believethis

isplausible,

discusswith

licenseew

hythis

is,not

sureif

itis

inm

anualor

autoor

what

theetpoint

is.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

dded

theprocedure

tothe

stem.

his

isO

kas

changed.W

asN

OT

originallya

U.

Changed

toan

S.

‘04G2.4.31,

New

,C

A,

Unit

131

H3

5p

pears

tobe

ok

C14n

it2

32H

3S

Dom

mas

andquotes

asappropriate.

pp

ears

tobe

Ok

Q6

ø4

ew

Me!n

orU

RE

xplainw

hydistractor

Dis

plausible.

Suggest

thatthe

answers

be

All

B1

2

C2

1new

answer

33F

2-3D

22

sk

licenseew

hatw

asthe

basisfor

theoriginal

distractorD

.

Fhursday,S

eptember

10.2009

Sw

asthe

totalnum

berof

valveson

eachheader.

ccepted

aschanged

byN

RC

.

)kas

changed.

)07A4.lO

,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

34F

3ppears

tobe

Ok

35H

35

Use

comm

asand

quotesas

appropriate

ppears

tobe

ok

,,84.P

iNewjQ

UrIt2

Ensure

thatbuses

isspelled

thesam

e,can

useb

usses

orbu

sesbut

they

36H

3ieed

tobe

usedconsistently.

Replace

statesw

ithidentifies

)therwise,

app

earsto

beok

Page 60: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D—

(F/H)

(1-5)

Stem

Cues

T/F

Cred.

Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

0=

SR

OU

/EJS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

hursday,S

eptember

10.2009

ccepted

asrecom

mended.

1OK

1Q

af1k4Q7

CA,U

nit2

onventionfor

usingassum

ingno

operatoraction.

Inother

questionsthis

‘asput

inparenthesis,

sothe

questionw

ouldread:

VO

OT

Fw

ouldcau

sethe

ob

served

conditions?(A

ssume

NO

Operator

37H

3S

•ctions)

)therwise,

appears

tobe

Ok

bursd

ay,

Sep

tember

10,2009

ccepted

asrecom

mended.

)kas

chan

ged

.

)10K

3.02,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

38H

3S

\pp

earsto

beO

k.

)12A2.03,

Modified

Bank

2773,M

emory,

Unit

1

Dhange

statesto

identifies

)uestionw

aschanged

andm

adeeasier,

however,

theansw

erdid

nothan

ge,

Nor

didthe

stemitself,

theonly

thingthat

changedw

asto

remove

39F

2S

heprocedure

thatw

asexpected

tobe

identifiedto

takecare

ofthe

loss.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

rhursday,S

eptem

ber

10,2009

Thanged

tobank

question.

dd

com

mas

andquotes

asnecessary.

ISthis

something

anP

0is

expectedto

know,

them

itigationand

useof

aO

Pw

hereE

SF

AS

hasor

hasnot

beenblocked?

Ask

thelicensee

to

40H

3nsu

rethat

Operations

agrees

with

this.

)therwise,

app

earsto

beO

k.

Thursday.

Sep

tember

10,2009

)perationsstates

thatthe

P0

shouldknow

.N

OT

blockedE

OP,

blocked)N

P.

Page 61: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

Dr

I—

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

IFC

red.JP

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

JSE

xplanationF

ocusj

Dist.

jLink

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

Un

Inthe

stem,

isitpossible

tochange

EA

RL

IEST

toF

IRS

T?

DID

this?

IfdistractorB

was

changedto

usethe

AH

PSIheader

vicethe

Bheader,

hisis

stillincorrect

right?T

hism

akesitm

oreplausible.

41F

3Is

theresom

ethingthat

couldm

akedistractor

Cm

oreplausible?

sklicensee

toreview

thisO

LD

NR

Cquestion.

Plausibilityof

distractors.

ST

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

VillchangeB

tothe

AH

PSIheader

viceB

.O

Kas

changed.N

OT

AU

as)riginally

thought.C

hangeto

anE.

122A2.05,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

dd

comm

asand

quotesw

hereappropriate.

Sep

aratethe

answers

foreach

questionin

thedistractors,

thisis

tohard

toead

with

bothin

oneparagraph.

since

LC

Oaction

statements

forR

Os

arelim

itedto

1hour

orless,

istractorsB

andD

couldbe

discounted.T

hisis

notallow

edfor

RO

xaminations.

Discuss

with

licenseeactions

toadd

herethat

RO

.pplicantsw

ouldbe

requiredto

know.

his

isconsidered

nonplausible

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

42H

3X

uR

ewrote

answers,

will

send

uesdayJuly

13,2010,

11:13AM

)uestionw

asrew

ritten.

om

mas

andquotes

asneeded.

Ihisis

thequestion

thatyou

decidedto

skipone

linebetw

eeneach

partof

heansw

erthis

isok,

however,

ifyou

dothis,

itwill

ben

ecessaryto

doit

orall

thequestions

thatap

pear

likethis.

Sam

ecom

ment

asabove

(ingreen),

asklicensee

howthis

isplausible.

I;ee

where

thetim

ew

entfrom

6to

5hours

butnot

surethat

thishelps

any.S

incethe

answer

does

nothave

todeal

with

aT

S,then

isthis

consideredrs

requiredknow

ledgethat

it hasnothing

todo

with

aT

S?

Discuss

with

licensee.Still

UN

SAT

!11:13A

M-

—--—

-—

——

---

--.

)26A1.01,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

kddcom

mas

where

necessary

bb

reviatio

ns

usedin

thisquestion

arenot

defined,for

example

CS

,C

ont.

43F

3.

Isthis

something

theapplicants

will

knowand

nothave

anissue

with

hem?

Fherevision

providedw

iththe

questionof

EO

P-15

forC

TP

Cis

rev27A

indthe

revprovided

onthe

referencedisc

is30.

The

referenceis

Jifferent.(R

ev30

isunit

2)

Page 62: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OKL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.L

inkunits

ward

K/A

Only

Dhange

thecontainm

entcooling

equipment for

distractorC

to

1AC

Spp

with

2800gpm

flowand

ON

EC

ont.C

oolingFan

SD

iscussw

ithlicensee.

rhursday.S

eptember

10,2009

rheyknow

what

CS

is.N

oneed

tochange.

ccepted

thechange

forC

.

3Q

4M

emory

Unit1

aU

rt2

diffetences

44F

2-3S

dd

comm

asand

quotesw

herenecessary

pp

earsto

beO

k

)59A2.04,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

45F

2-3S

Thange

statesto

indicatesC

hangedas

requested.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

Thange

distractorB,

2A

con

den

satepum

ptrips

toM

SISoccurs.

This

will

ringin

unitdifferences.

46F

2-3)therw

iseap

pears

tobe

Ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009S

Aakes

more

challengingquestion.

dd

comm

asas

necessary

Sep

aratethe

firstsen

tence

fromthe

secondone

with

aline.

Figures

areO

kto

beused.

47H

3S

mange

theansw

erto

read104

gpm

gree

with

handoutsfor

thisquestion.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

ccepted

recomm

endations.

Page 63: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

CD

——

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q’

SR

OU

IEJSE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

JAO

nly

)62G2.4.4,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

\ddcom

mas

where

necessary.

dd

quotesaround

theprocedures

names.

dd

linesp

acebetw

eenthe

WO

OT

Fand

thequestions.

48H

3In

eachdistractor

un-capitalizethe

first“B

us’

)therwise

itappearsto

beO

k

ST

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

ccepted

comm

entsabove.

kThesecond

partof

eachansw

eris

NO

Telicited.

Need

toch

ange

theiuestion

toallow

forthe

secondansw

er.C

anchange

thisto

afill

inthe

lankor

justadd

thesecond

question.

)therwise

appears

tobe

Ok.

49H

3T

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

)hangedthis

to2

partquestion,

part1

andpart

2.

Villfaxto

seew

hatw

asdone.

uesday,July

13,2010,

11:13A

M

Reform

attedO

kw

ithform

at.

64K1

.02,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

Thange

questionto

read:W

OO

TF

identifiesthe

1AE

DG

responds

tothe

ockoutrelay

beingreset?

Changed

asrequested.

dd

the1A

toE

DO

inthe

“The

1AE

DO

will:”

50H

2-3he

secondpart

ofeach

stem,

isnot

askedfor

inthe

questionstem

.M

odifythe

questionto

elicitthis

information.

Ihursday,S

eptember

10,2009

\ndw

hatother

conditionsrunning/starting

areapplicable.

)kas

changed.

)73K3,01,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

rhereis

ON

LY

onem

onitor,the

answer,

thathas

acontrol

function.T

hisflakes

theother

monitors

implausible.

51F

2-3dd

anotherm

onitorthat

hasa

controlfunction

butdoes

notresult

inan

unmonitored

release,if

possible.A

sklicensee

ifthereis

sucha

monitor?

Fhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

was

replacedw

ithS/G

blowdow

n,w

illclose

butifnot

closedw

illbe

nonitored.

Page 64: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-401,

Rev.

9W

rittenE

xamination

Review

Worksheet

Form

ES-401

-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

IFC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

/EIS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

lsocapitalized

instem

thew

ordU

NM

ON

ITO

RE

D.

)76k406,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

States

toidentifies

Period

atthe

endof

distractorB.

Thew

aythat

distractorsA

andB

arew

ritten,they

donot

havethe

word

)perablein

them.

Ifan

applicantch

ose

anansw

erbecau

seof

where

thew

ordis

he/shew

ouldhave

a50%

chanceto

getit correct

(inthis

case).

)utof

servicedoes

notm

eanoperable

orinoperable.

Change

thew

ordingto

reflectw

hatis

beingasked.

Distractors

Cand

Dhave

reasonsw

hythey

areor

arenot

operable.D

istractorsA

andB

donot.

Add

reasonsfor

Aand

B

Rew

ordthe

questionto

ask:(the

valvew

asalready

definedso

usethe

52H

2-3alve

number,

vicenoun

name.)

Vith

5B21215

open,w

hichone

ofthe

following....

dd

tothe

stem,

andw

hy!

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Villsendthe

chan

ges

tothis

question.

uesday,July

13,2010,

11:13AM

Reform

atted.

Need

comm

asin

thestem

between

thevalve

number

andnam

e.

fwe

aregoing

touse

capsforthe

secondpart ofa

questionie.W

HY

,we

houlddo

thisforallthe

questions.

DKas

changed.

)78A3.01,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

Inthe

stem,

100

hasa

spacebetw

eenthe

1and

thefirst0.

Bridge

thejap.

\dda

periodat the

endof

distractorD.

Delete

thecharacter

spacein

53F

2-3S

listractorD

which

isin

front ofR

ESET.

)therwise

appearsto

beOk

Thursday,Septem

ber10,

2009

Dhanges

were

made

asrequested.

Page 65: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OKL

OD

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.L

inkunits

ward

K/A

Only

)78K402,

Bank

1894,C

A,

Unit

0

Inthe

stem,

changethe

word

“states”to

“identifies”

Jerylow

levelC

A54

H2-3

S)therw

iseap

pears

tobe

Ok.

Ihursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Dhanges

made

asrequested.

Ok

aschanged.

1o3K3:o2,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

0

Inthe

stem,

capitalizethe

word

VIO

LA

TIO

N.

This

will

helpthe

applicante

clearon

what

isbeing

asked.55

F2-3

S)th

erwse

appears

tobe

Ok.

Fhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

)K,

changedas

requested.

)01K3.02,

Bank

2222,C

A,

Unit

1

\ddin

thestem

thatthe

“rodcontrol

switch

cannot

betaken

outof

theIIT

HD

RA

Wposition.

Itisnot

clearifthe

rodthat

isbelow

thegroup

isin

group7.

Ifthisis

true56

H3

hansay

so.

)therwise

app

earsto

beok.

ST

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Thanged

asrequested.

Ok

)02K4.10,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

Vhen

RC

Stem

peratureis

listedas

that,w

hatis

itactually?T

hT

cw

hatave,

havelicensee

explain.

57H

3S

ppears

tobe

Ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

dd

edas

requested,R

CS

temperature

isthe

coldleg,

changedas

requested.

1 6K1

.06,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

)nthe

S/Gpressure

line,SIG

1B

indicates88opsia

forchannel

Aand

B.N

eedto

puta

charactersp

acebetw

een,880

andpsia.

Done

How

aboutbolding

andcapitalizing

FAIL

ED

LO

Ww

hereit

app

earson

the

58H

3able.

So

theapplicants

donot

miss

oneof

them.

Done

The

way

thisquestion

isw

ritten,itis

hardto

readfor

some

reason.T

hereiay

notbe

aw

ayto

helpthat.

)nthe

stemof

thequestion,

capitalizeand

boldL

OC

KO

UT

Done

s)therw

iseap

pears

tobe

ok

Page 66: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

ISE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

Thursday,

Septem

ber10.

2009

llaccepted.

Ii7K6.01,

Bank

2007,C

A,

Unit

1

Inthe

stem,

operabilityis

usedand

doesnot

seemappropriate.

Use

condition.”N

otsure

thisis

better.A

sklicensee

tofind

betterw

ord.U

sedstatus”

he

secondpart

ofthe

answer,

Distractor

Aand

distractorC

arethe

59H

2-3;am

e,how

ever,they

arew

rittendifferently.

Change

Asecond

partto

lookike

Csecond

part,w

hichis:

“Both

channelsare

NO

Tused

forfurther

calculations.”A

ccepted.

Shursday.

Septem

ber10.

2009

Thanged

fromO

perabilityto

status.

27K501,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

nthe

stem,

isitn

ecessaryto

highlight“lim

ittherelease”

toen

sue

itis

readby

theapplicants?

Added

this.

Foreach

distractor,put

eachitem

ona

separate

line.Itis

hardto

etermine

where

thesecond

questionsansw

erstarts.

As

follows

for60

F3

istractorA

:

shieldbuilding

fansH

VE

-6Aand

HV

E-6B

with

charcoalfilter

trainsD

emisters

torem

ovew

aterparticles

andheaters

toreduce

humidity.

srhursday,

Septem

ber10.

2009

ccepted

secondcom

ment.

)28K201,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

Inthe

stemthe

DG

sloaded

oneach

respectivebus,

right?C

hangethis

tonake

itclearer.D

idthis

Rew

ordthe

lastto:

61F

3H

owever,

thefeeder

breakerto

MC

C1A

5tripped

open.T

hisseem

slearer.

)therwise

appears

ok.

Fhursday.S

eptember

10,2009

3kas

changed.

62H

2-3S

)29A3.01,

Bank

2126,C

A,

Unit

1

Page 67: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

L0D

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

IFC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/E

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

ontain

men

tpurge,

thisquestion

may

provideinform

ationfor

oneof

theS

RO

questions,need

todeterm

inew

hichone

itis.

SR

Oquestion

92n

eeds

tobe

reviewed

toensure

thisquestion

does

not)rovide

anyguidance

answering

thisone

andvise

virsa.

)therwise

itapp

earsto

beO

k.

Ihursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Did

notprovide

anyinform

ationthat

couldbe

used.O

kas

is.

)41A2,02,

NEW

,C

A,

Unit

163

H3

S\ppears

tobe

Ok.

)75A201,

New

,C

A,

bothunits

dd

comm

as,

Skipa

linebetw

eenthe

Performa

Unit

down...

andthe

distractors.

rhestem

seems

toindicate

thedistractors

arethe

nextstep

sto

getdone.

Thisis

notw

hatis

indicatedin

thestem

.A

skthat!

64H

35

FheS

RO

hasdecided

toperform

aU

nitS

hutdown

andw

hatare

theorder

rfexpectedactions

heis

goingto

directhis

operatorto

perform.

)therwise

app

earsto

beok.

Thursday.

Septem

ber10,

2009

han

ged

asrequested

above.

)86G2.4.18,

New

,C

A,

Units

1&

2.

dd

appropriatecom

mas,

dd

tothe

firstquestion,

lAW

ON

P-100.2

toensure

thelink

with

this,rocedure

when

askingfor

theA

ppendixR

connection.D

idthis.

(‘Ihyw

ouldanyone

believethat

theprotective

tripsare

disabledw

hen65

H2-3

Joingto

ISOL

AT

E?

Isthis

ageneric

weakness

orsom

ething?T

hisdoes

iotseem

veryplausible.

Most

isolatesw

itchs

area

lotof

othersw

itcheshat

havea

lotofother

idiosyncrasies,ok

asitis.

OK

asis,

deedto

come

upw

ithanother

reasonthat

ism

oreplausible

thanthis

one.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

S)k

asis,

with

change(s)suggested.

2.1

.19

,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

Fordistractors

Cand

D,

adda

comm

aafter

however,

66H

2-3S

Vis

notdefined

inthis

question.T

hisneed

sto

bedone

toinsure

noonfusion.

Som

eplace.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

Page 68: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LOK

LO

D(F/H

)(1

-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-0

=S

PO

U/E

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

Defined

GV

earlierin

thedistractor.

32.1,34,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Sep

arateeach

distractorso

eachthought

inon

asep

arateline.

This

will

nakeiteasier

toread.

Did

this.

Isthis

operationallyvalid

forthe

P0

applicants?A

sklicensee

and

67F

3S

)perations.Y

ES

theyare

expected.

)therwise

appears

tobe

Ok.

rhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

JKas

changedas

well

asR

Olevel.

They

areexpected

toknow

thisinform

ation.

32.1.4,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit0

68F

2-3S

pp

earsto

beO

k.

5.2.35,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Isthis

something

youexpect

thatan

P0

isexpected

toknow

?A

skL

icenseeto

make

surethis

isan

P0

knowledge.

Make

sureO

perations

69F

2-3‘igrees

with

this.

.pp

earsto

beOk

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

)perationsstate

shouldknow

this.A

ndthey

will

knowthis.

5.2.2.39,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

70F

2-3S

.pp

earsto

match

KA

32.3.13,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Inthe

firstsentence,

thefirst

letterof

thew

ord“U

nit”should

bea

small

letter.

om

mas

where

necessary.71

F3

SThe

KA

issort

ofm

atchedin

thatthe

KA

statesthat

“Know

ledgeof

radiologicalsafety

procedurespertaining

tolicensed

operators’luties/radiological

control.W

ellthe

procedurehits

theK

A,

inthat,

itasks

boutcontacting

HP

tonotify

thestart

ofthe

Charging

pump.

gree,

meets

theK

A.

72C

A3

S32.3.4,

Bank,

2034,C

A

Page 69: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Jo

bC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D—

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

IEC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OIJ/E

ISE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

\ppears

tobe

ok.

32.4.18,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nitI

Dom

mas

where

necessary.

\ddto

thestem

theprocedure

thatdirects

these

actions.W

eneed

toinsure

thatthere

areno

otherprocedures

thatcould

becalled

uponto

answer

thequestion.

What

procedureis

it?A

rethere

2procedures

orust

one?T

hisw

illtighten

upthe

question.

rhisquestions

KA

isthe

specificknow

ledgeof

EO

Ps/E

mergency

7P

rocedures.T

hequestion

lendsitself

toidentify

what

actionsare

3F

ecessaryin

thearea

ofinterest.

This

question,how

ever,does

NO

Tnatch

theK

A.

Needs

tobe

replaced.

rhursday,S

eptember

10,2009

)uestionw

asrew

ritten.W

illreview

afterit

issent.

Fuesday,July

13,2010,

11:13A

M

)uestioncom

pletelychanged.

schanged

Ok.

2.4

.2,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

Inthe

stem,

changethe

word

‘states”to

thew

ord“identifies”

74F

2-3S

ppears

tobe

Ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

Thanged

asrequested.

52.4.6,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

75F

35

om

mas

asn

ecessary

.pp

earsto

beO

k.

107E

G2.4.2O

.N

ew,

CA

,U

nit2

Inthe

stem,

after2-E

OP-1

SP

TA

sadd

acom

ma

after2-E

OP-1

butbefore

PT

As

)iscussionfor

distractorC

statesthat

itisa

recentchange

(11/06/07),

thiss

consideredrecent?

Ask

licensee.Y

ES

76H

2-3Senerically,

placeeach

thoughton

asep

arateline,

itis

hardto

readboth

‘henthey

areon

thesam

eline.

Sep

aratethem

out.D

one

dd

tothe

stemthe

requiredprocedure,

ieO

P-521,

Em

ergencyO

peratingP

rocedureIm

plementation.

Think

aboutre-w

ritingto

something

like‘...W

OO

TF

directionsC

AN

begiven

lAW

OP-521

tothe

crewD

one

his

way

thereis

noreason

why

theapplicants

would

notknow

where

therequirem

entcom

esfrom

.

Page 70: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

IFC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

UIEIS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

tihatis

therequired

minim

umsubcooled

margin?

Ask

licensee.U

seigure

1A

and/or1B.

Usually

approx.20

degF.

)therwise

appears

tobe

ok.

Thursday,

Septem

ber10,

2009

)kas

changed.

)09EA

2.14,N

ewC

AU

NIT

I

dd

acom

ma

afterthe

EO

Pbetw

eenL

OC

A.

Done

Ihat

RC

Stem

peratureis

thisrepresenting?

Tcold?

Ask

licensee.ThOt

TheN

OT

Eprior

tostep

67states

‘Cooldow

nrates

upto

100Fin

any1

hourperiod

areperm

ittedto

regaino

maintain

minim

umsubcooling.”

77H

3X

Thisseem

sto

bea

bettersecond

answer

thenw

hatis

presentlythere.

mange

distractorsA

andB

secondpart

toread,

Should

havebeen

Band

Cnot

A.

ool

down

ratesup

to100

Fin

anyone

hourare

permitted.

ST

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009

)hangedB

andC

toread

asrecom

mended.

22AA

2O4,

New

,C

A,

Unit2

dd

acom

ma

between

procedurenum

berand

procedurenam

e.D

one

mange

thevalue

oftim

ein

Band

Dto

be0358,

thisis

closerto

thelim

ithen

thePZ

Rbecom

esIN

OPE

RA

BL

E.

Done

78H

3s

thisan

SR

Oonly

questionas

well

asis

thisa

number

expectedto

berem

embered

byS

RO

sie.

The

6hour

time

requirement.

Ask

thelicensee

flicensee

agrees

itapp

earsto

beok.

hursday,S

eptember

10,2009,

S)perations

expectsthat

theS

RO

sare

responsibleto

knowthis

nformation.

)58AG

2.2A,

NE

W,

CA

,U

nit1

79H

3D

oyou

haveto

usethe

fullnam

eas

Trip

Channel

Bypass

vicechannel

)ypass?W

ouldthis

bem

orecorrect

oris

itOk

thew

ayit

is?A

sklicensee.

No

donot

needto

usethe

formal

name,

asis,

isO

k.

Page 71: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

——

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#/B

ack-Q

=S

RO

UIE

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

dd

tothe

stem,

Which

oneof

thefollow

ing;B

etween

thefirst

senten

ceind

thenthe

questions.D

one

)therwise

app

earsto

beok

uesday,July

13,2010

)Kasch

anged

.

62AA

205

New

CA

Unit

2

Use

acom

ma

afterthe

procedurenum

berand

nounnam

e.

Put

quotesaround

thenoun

name

forthe

valve,as

was

donefor

therocedures.

lhe

levelof

thisquestion

isnot

consideredas

CA

.T

hisquestion

resultsrom

adirect

quote/mem

oryitem

fromthe

procedure.T

helevel

ofthe

luestionneeds

tobe

changed.D

iscussw

ithlicensee.

SR

Olevel,

discussw

ithlicensee

why

itisnot!

Replaced

IhisK

Aw

ith0038E

A1

.41*

was

unableto

write

aS

RO

80H

2-3X

luestion,spent

many

hourstrying.

uesd

ay,

July13,

2010

Replaced

thisquestion

will

sendfor

review.

uesdayJu

ly1

32010

1113A

M

)uestioncom

pletelyre

written

S,

New

CA

NO

referencem

aterial’Is

thissom

ethingan

SR

Ow

ouldknow

fromM

emory

asklicen

see7

flicensee

says

yesap

pears

tobe

Ok

U)65A

G2.4.50,

NE

W,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Since

thereis

aleak

inthe

containment

instrument

airsystem

,w

ouldthis

)ressurebe

lower

than80

(thesetpoint)

orlow

ering.T

hisshould

bethanged

to79

andlow

er,to

getoffthe

setpointand

thenslow

ly??A

sklicensee.

Done,

to79

andslow

lylow

ering.

lVhy

isdistractor

Aand

Bdifferent

where

thevalve

MV

-i8-iis

listed?Is

itlisted

inB

secondb

ecause

ofthe

implication

thatthe

EO

Pw

ouldbe

81M

2ntered

first?IF

sothen

thisseem

sim

plausible.C

hangedB

tohave

the)rocedure,

valve(18-1)

thenthe

trippingof

theR

CP

s.A

lsoneed

to;apitalize

CL

OS

Ein

distractcrA

.(T

heA

nswer.)

Sep

aratequestion

2into

2parts,

where,

thepart

“Afew

minutes

laterit

vasdeterm

inedan

instrument

airleak

isoccurring,”

ina

senten

ceprior

tohe

secondquestion.

Done

Fhisw

ouldlook

like:

1)W

hichone

ofthe

following

isperform

edlA

Wthe

AR

P?

Page 72: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-401,

Rev.

9W

rittenE

xamination

Review

Worksheet

Form

ES-401-9

2.3._P

sychometric_F

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

CD

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

QS

AC

UIEJS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

fewm

inuteslater

itwas

determined

aninstrum

entair

leakis

occurring.d

ded

thisas

recomm

ended.

)If containm

entairpress

ISthis

SR

O,

andw

hy.S

eemthat

thisquestion

canbe

answered

with

UST

AC

knowledge.

Selection

ofappropriate

procedures.S

trategyor

Lctionof

procedure.A

cceptas

SA

CO

NL

Y.

he

questionis

NO

Tclear

iftheleak

isinside

containment,

canthis

beightened

up?C

ontainment

instrument

is79

psigand

slowly

lowering

andutside

instrument

airpressure

105psig

andstable.

OK

with

change.

RE

TH

EA

CT

ION

SO

NU

NIT

2D

IFF

ER

EN

T?

5u

esday

,July

13,2010

)Kw

ithchanges.

37AA

iO,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

Thange

distractorA

tobe

thetotal

ofthe

1Aand

lBS

Gs

togetherxceeds.

..This

way

thereis

nodispute

thatit

isa

correctansw

er.D

iscuss,ith

licensee.C

hangeas

requested,this

couldhave

beenconsidered

JJorrect.

Vhy

would

itbeexpected

toselect

answer

C.

There

seems

tobe

nformation

missing

concerningthe

changein

leakagefrom

thelast

reading.If this

information

isnot

providedthen

theapplicantcan

discounthis

answer

onfirst

goaround.

More

information

isn

ecessaryto

make

thifl)Iausible.

Ok

asis

nothinghas

tochange

with

thisone.

Nhy

isthis

entirequestion

consideredS

AC

only?T

hisquestion

isasking

82H

2-3he

applicantto

recallinform

ationfrom

theL

CO

(top)of

theT

S3.4.6.2,

hisis

AC

knowledge

based

onthe

SA

Conly

guidance.D

iscussw

ithlicensee.

Page

4of

SA

Conly,

secondpart

isbelow

theline,

statesthe

licensee.

luesday,July

13,2010

Nill

senda

rew

riteto

useS

Gs

only?

Sru

esday

.July13,

2010,11:13A

M

uestio

nre-w

ritten.R

ecomm

endedcom

ments

accepted.

)kas

changed.

83H

2-3)67A

G2A

.21,N

ew,

CA

,U

nit1

Page 73: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3._P

sychometric_F

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LOK

LO

D—

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

1E1SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

Ibelievethat

distractorsB

andC

havea

time

frame

of15

minutes

afterth

liscoveryof

thefile.

Isthis

true?N

Ois

it10

mm

.H

owabout

changinglistractors

Aand

Btim

efrom

0940to

0950.T

hisw

ouldm

akethe

10mm

siark

from0940.

Discuss

with

licensee.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

uesd

ay,

July13,

2010

dded

“uncontrolled”in

thestem

toensure

)Kas

is,no

chan

ges

necessary

basedon

validation.

74

EG

22

A0

,N

ew,

Unit

1

sthis

something

thatan

SR

Ois

expectedto

knowfrom

mem

ory?A

skicensee.

)therwise

appears

tobe

Ok.

84H

uesd

ay,

July13,

2010

hereis

aspecific

objectivein

theclassroom

.

)psstates

toughbut

failquestion.

Jkas

is.

76AA

2.04,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nitI

dd

thew

ord“the”

priorto

selectedin

thestem

.D

one.

Inthe

stem,

changequestion

1)from

what

isoccurring

tow

hathas

)ccurred.D

one,

Nhy

would

acrud

bursthappen

ifpower

was

constantand

nothing)ccurred

toprovoke

it?A

sklicensee

ifthisis

plausible.A

changein

pHvould

dothis.

Not

statedin

thestem

.85

F2-3

Nhile

thenote

inthe

providedprocedure

indicatesthat

theinform

ation)rovided,

onlyiodine

increasing,w

ouldbe

thecau

seof

fuelelem

entallure,

howelse

would

theapplicant

knowthis?

Do

we

needto

addthe

)rocedureto

lockin

thisansw

er,or

isthis

Ok

thew

ayit

is?

luesday,July

13,2010

Inthe

stem,

remove

thew

ordFU

EL

,

\ddcom

ma

between

2202and

Process.

)03G2.1.32,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1,

dd

comm

abetw

eenprocedure

number

andnam

e.

Spellout

SNO

,w

hatis

this?S

hortN

oticeO

utage

86H

3h

an

ge

distractorsA

andB

firstpart

tolook

likeC

andD

firstpart.

The

RC

Pm

ayN

OT

bestarted

with

thecurrent

RC

S/S

teamG

eneratordelta

T.Fhis

way,

itis

nothighlighted

thatthe

temp

ofthe

SG

ishigher,

thisw

ayhe

applicanthas

todeterm

ineif

itisw

ithinthe

range.IT

doesnot

providerny

help.Follow

edrecom

mendation.

Page 74: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricF

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D(F/H

)(1-5)

Stem

Cues

TIF

Cred.

PartialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U1EJS

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Linkunits

ward

K/A

Only

lasedon

theinitial

conditions,itap

pears

thatL

TO

Pw

ouldbe

inservice

nddoes

nothave

tobe

identifiedin

thestem

.Is

thiscorrect?

No

itdoesS

othave

tobe

identified.

)therwise

app

earsto

beok.

•uesday,July

13,2010

)Kw

ithch

anges

made.

)10A

2.01,B

ank(N

RC

2004E

xam),

CA

,U

nit 2,

Nhat

isthe

purposeof

thesecond

Given

bullet?E

xplain’A

lso,in

thisrtatem

ent,the

word

“method”

missing

fromthe

statement

asit

isw

rittenin

hereference.

Makes

thedistractors

more

credible.

87H

3S

Isit expected

forthe

SR

Os

toknow

theexpected

surveillancenum

berfor

heheater

KW

of155?

Ask

licensee.

)therwise

questionap

pears

tobe

ok.

Fuesday,July

13,2010

)Kas

is.

)12G2.4.31,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

2

han

ge

thew

ord“w

ould”to

“could”in

thefirst

question.D

one

Ineach

distractor,w

herethe

word

“however”

isused,

itshouldbe

recededand

followed

bya

comm

a.For

example,

88F

2-3S

.

ledid

notkill

her,how

ever,he

wished

hehad.

Done

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k

uesday,July

13,2010

)kas

changed.

163A2.01,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

1

Inthe

stemthere

isa

statement

aboutthe

crosstie

ofthe

1AB

andthe

1BD

Cbuses.

Isthis

necessary

todescribe

systemlineup,

orit

isteaching?

Bcan

bealigned

toA

orB.

89F

3S

om

mas

afterprocedure

number

andnoun

name.

Done

Procedure

1-O

NP

-50.01,page

14of

14,flow

chartidentifies

allG

roundIsolation

proceduresas

Ground

Detection

procedures.T

hisis

misleading

ndshould

bechanged.

Will

capturein

conditionreport

systemto

fix.

)nthe

edgeof

beingan

SR

Oknow

ledge.

Page 75: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

2.3._P

sychometric_F

laws

4.Job

Content

Flaw

s5.

Other

6.7.

Q#

LO

KL

OD

I—

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temIC

uesT

/FC

red.Partial

Job-M

inutia#1

Back-

Q=

SR

OU

/E/S

Explanation

Focu

siD

ist.Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

)therwise

app

earsto

beok.

uesd

ay,

July13,

2010

)Kas

changed.

76A2.01,

Modified

Bank

(2008N

RC

Exam

),U

nit2

nthe

firstquestion,

1),highlight

thew

ords“im

mediate

attempt”

byputting

uotesaround

them,

asseen

above.D

one

nquestion

2),start

thequestion

bystating

WO

OT

Fw

ouldbe

therequired

ctionsifthe

pump

startedw

iththe

2CIC

Wpum

pvalve

alignment

was

onfiguredto

theB

sidebut

theelectrical

alignment

remained

onthe

Aside?

Done

90F

3S

..

.

Inquestion

2,w

hichpum

pis

postulatedin

starting?Is

itthe2C

orthe

2Bum

pfrom

above?T

hisis

the2C

pump.

Meets

therequirem

entsfor

modification.

)therwise

app

earsto

beO

k.

ruesday,July

13,2010

)Kthe

way

itwas

changed.

)27A2.01,

New

,C

A,

Unit

2

iIn

question1),

addcom

ma

after..

-03,and

putnam

ein

quotes.

rhew

aythe

distractorsare

written

isconfusing.

Done

Fordistractors

Aand

B,add

“After”

beforeconsultation.

Done

Fordistractors

Cand

D,

add,A

fterconsultation

with

theT

SC

with

anyH

2

91H

3oncentration

when

H2

Recom

binersare

NO

Tavailable.

Done.

Distractors

thathave

“High

Containm

enttem

perature,”are

NO

Tplausible.

Fhisdoes

notm

akesen

sethat

ahigh

containment tem

pw

ouldcau

sethe

tdsorberbed

temp

hialarm

.C

ome

upw

ithanother

reason.T

hisis

nota

jood

one.S

eems

likethis

isa

validdistractor

based

onvalidation.

)hangethis

froma

Uto

anE,

initialreview

.

Suesday,

July13,

2010

man

ges

made

areO

k.

129G2.4.50,

New

,C

A,

Unit

1

hereference

material

provideddoes

notshow

theT

Sinternal

pressureo

0.7psig,

notsure

where

thiscam

efrom

,ask

licenseeto

show.

Correct

)omm

ent

92H

2-3F

oundT

S3.6.1.4,

which

identifiesthe

-0.7psig

value.

Based

onthe

TS3.6.1.4

Primai’y

containment internalp

ressure

shallb

em

aintainedbetw

een—

0.7an

d2.4

PS

IG.

Itapp

earsthat

thisknow

ledgeis

RO

knowledge

andis

a1

houror

lessT

S.T

hew

aythis

luestionis

written

isR

Oand

NO

TS

RO

ON

LY

knowledge.

This

need

sto

‘echanged.

Page 76: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES

-401,R

ev.9

Written

Exam

inationR

eviewW

orksheetF

ormE

S-401-9

2.3.

Psychom

etricFlaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D—

——

——

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U/F

/SE

xplanationF

ocusD

ist.L

inkunits

ward

K/A

Only

uesday,July

13,2010

Villreceive

aN

EW

copythat

made

thesecond

partS

RO

only.

uesday,July

13.2010

11:13A

M

SR

eplacement

question

ppears

tobe

Ok.

)34K4.03,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

2

dd

acom

ma

afterprocedure

number

andput

proceduresin

quotes,also

-idda

space

between

thefirst

2sen

tences.

(onem

oresp

aceprior

toppen

dix

F).

han

ge

thestem

toread;

sthe

Refueling

SR

O,

WO

OT

Fidentifies

thedirection

youw

ouldprovide

othe

Refueling

Machine

operatorand

why?

Done

93F

3D

istractorD

,does

notm

akesen

seto

me

andtherefore

notplausible.

Vhen

itisread

ittalksabout

theB

ridgeand

Trolley

manual

positioning...his

information

isN

OT

presentedin

thequestion

andtherefore

couldbe

ruledout.

Replace

distractorD!

uesday,July

13,2010

SViii

leavedistractor

Das

is,there

were

novalidators

thatselected

this-tnsw

er.Itis

identifiedin

theprocedure

,which

Ididnot

seebefore.

2.1

.1,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

2

94F

3S

.ddcom

mas

where

needed.

pp

earsto

beO

k.

2i

9,

New

,C

A,

Unit2

95H

3S

pp

earsto

beO

k

2.2

i7,

New

,M

emory,

Unit

096

F2-3

Su

estion

appears

tobe

ok,not

verychallenging

2.2

.43

,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit1

Did

notreceive

AD

M17.18.

97F

35

Skipa

linesp

aceafter

thefirst

senten

ce,as

donein

question98.

pp

earsto

beO

k.

Page 77: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

1.2.

3.P

sychometric

Flaw

s4.

JobC

ontentF

laws

5.O

ther6.

7.Q

#L

OK

LO

D—

(F/H)

(1-5)S

temC

uesT

/FC

red.P

artialJob-

Minutia

#1B

ack-Q

=S

RO

U1E1S

Explanation

Focus

Dist.

Link

unitsw

ardK

/AO

nly

22,1

1,

Bank

(NR

C2004),

Mem

ory,U

nitI

(isthis

KA

correct,have

te

98F

3S

heck

itout,seem

slike

itis

outof

place),

ppears

tobe

Ok.

3.2.4.19,L

AST

NR

CEX

AM

,C

A,

Unit

199

CA

3S

pp

earsto

beO

k.

32.4,30,N

ew,

Mem

ory,U

nit0

100F

2-3S

Vhat

everconvention

hasbeen

used,highlight

thew

ord“R

EQ

UIR

ED

”in

hestem

toensure

theapplicants

readit.

pp

earsto

beO

k.

3RO

ON

LY

5U

nsats

I enhancements.

12sats

RO

11U

nsats

4enhancem

ents

(0sats

ES

-401,R

ev.9

2F

ormE

S-401-9

Page 78: FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS - nrc.gov · # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c ; chief examiner concurrence required. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1Quality Checklist

Facility: ST. LUCIE Date of Exam: December 15, 2009 Exam Lev1

Initials

Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before gradingRSB NA

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and RSBdocumented

3. Applicants’ scores checked for addition errorsRSB

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) — —

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 ±2% overall and 70 or 80,RSB

as applicable, ±4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail — —

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades RSBare justified —

6. Performance on missed questions checked for trainingdeficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of RSBquestions missed by half or more of the applicants

Printed_Name/SJgature Date

a. Grader Richard S. 01/21/2010

b. Facility Reviewer(*) NA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Mark A. Bates! /‘2Z1 ]ETh 01/25/2010

d. NRC Supervisor (*) Malcolm T. Widmann/ .

(*) The facility reviewer’s signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;two independent NRC reviews are required.

O:\St. Lucie Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\QA documents\St Lucie 2009 301 and 302Written Exa Grading Qal Check list (rsb)ES-403-1 .doc