final aqci exampledsa
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/21/2019 Final AQCI Exampledsa
1/2
AQCI #1
Lecture: Multiculturalism in Western Europe and North America
Lecturer: Dr. Laura Laubeova/Antonin Mikes
Student: Leeann Davulis
Date: March 6 !""#
A$%&: %ornell Stephen 'artmann Dou(las )*++,-. Ethnicity and Race. Making Identities in a Changing World.
ine or(e ress/A Sa(e ublication %ompan0 te1t on 23he De4inition o4 5ace pp !*789 6,76+.
1. Central Quotation
2Ethnicit0 and race are not the same but the0 are not mutuall0 e1clusive cate(ories either. 3he0 sometimes overlap. &n shortraces ma0 be but are not necessaril0 ethnic (roups. )%ornell 'artmann !-2. Argument
%ornell and 'artmann ar(ue throu(hout this essa0 that the terms race and ethnicit0 althou(h used interchan(eabl0 throu(hout
historical te1ts are markedl0 di44erent cate(ories ;here race is primaril0 based on similar ph0sical characteristics and ethnicit0
primaril0 classi4ies (roups 4rom a common ori(in ancestr0 or descent. While race is assi(ned b0 those outside the (roup bein(classi4ied ethnicit0 is assi(ned b0 those individuals ;ithin the ethnic (roup and these assertions create an identit0 commonl0
shared. Ethnicit0 4orms 4eelin(s o4 sel47assertion and sel47concept ;ithin the (roup< race is sociall0 constructed to;ards the (roup
bein( de4ined b0 the (roup in po;er. 3his 4orms a sti(ma attachin( race to bein( inherently in4erior di44erent o4 a lo;er status
and places racial (roups in the lo;est cate(ories o4 hierarch0 ;ithin social or(ani=ations. 5ace almost al;a0s pertains to skin
color or other ph0sical classi4ications rather than ori(ination. 'o;ever %ornell and 'artmann also e1plain that both ethnicit0 and
race overlap in a number o4 ;a0s ;hich is ;h0 the terms are so di44icult to de4ine. 3he most appropriate e1ample o4 overlappin(
is ho; a (roup o4 people can be classi4ied as ori(inatin( 4rom the same territor0 ;hile simultaneousl0 sharin( common ph0sical
characteristics< thus the0 can>t be classi4ied under race or ethnicit0 because the0 embod0 both de4initions at the same time.3. Question
3he ?uestion raised in this essa0 is literall0 2What is 5ace@ ;hich cannot easil0 be interpreted as both authors sho; throu(he1amples o4 ho; de4initions o4 race and ethnicit0 have chan(ed over time. 3he ?uestion is put at its best ;hen insi(ht is o44ered
throu(h stud0in( the lists o4 racial and ethnic cate(ories that various countries use to de4ine their populations. or instance the
authors ask i4 there in 4act onl0 4ive races in the nited States accordin( to its census bureau. Br are there onl0 4our accordin( to
the South A4rican (overnment@ urthermore these cate(ories have been chan(ed and renamed over time and the ethnic (roups
classi4ied under them have been shi4ted as ;ell makin( the ar(ument o4 2;hat is race@ all the more comple1 and unans;erable.
4. Experiential Connection
Cro;in( up m0 ;hole li4e as a second (eneration nited States citi=en it has al;a0s been eas0 to 4ill out 4orms in school and
check o44 the bo1 2White or 2%aucasian. &t ;ould realisticall0 be impossible to classi40 all the ethnic (roups ;ithin the nitedStates ;ithout runnin( out o4 room on the pa(e. 'o;ever & o4ten ;onder ho; it must 4eel to have to classi40 onesel4 in such a
narro; cate(ori=ation as 2White lack Latino or Bther. 3he sense o4 identit0 is lost ;ithin these classi4ications. &n addition it
is ver0 eas0 to overlap these identities ;here one person can be simultaneousl0 White and 'ispanic 4rom South A4rica b0 ori(in
and livin( on a Native American reservation. Althou(h this ma0 not seem plausible it is ?uite possible 4or Americans to have this
t0pe o4 multi7ethnic herita(e and be (enuinel0 con4used as to ho; the0 are de4ined b0 others around them in contrast to ho; the0
de4ine themselves and their relationship to others ;ithin their ethnic identit0.5. Textual Connection
3his te1t closel0 resembles the attempt b0 3.'. Eriksen>s*essa0 to de4ine the terms o4 ethnicit0 and race speci4icall0. Eriksen>sobservations con4irm %ornell and 'artmann>s ar(ument that ;hile race and ethnicit0 tend to be de4ined in similar terms and
(rouped to(ether more o4ten than not ;hen bein( studied there still remains an important and 2distin(uishable di44erence
bet;een ethnicit0 and race. 3he te1ts do have variations thou(h< ;hereas %ornell and 'artmann speak o4 overlappin( throu(h
politicall0 and sociall0 or(ani=ed terms Eriksen also sees overlappin( but his e1ample is more direct throu(h the ph0sical
interbreedin( o4 the human population over time. oth essa0s clearl0 de4ine ho;ever that there isa di44erence bet;een race and
ethnicit0 and it lies ;ithin one similar comparison< that race is sociall0 constructed b0 outside (roups as a ;a0 o4 classi40in(
2them or 2other ;hile ethnicit0 is de4ined ;ithin the (roup itsel4 as 2us. Althou(h Eriksen a(rees there are di44erences in the
ideolo(ies o4 race and ethnicit0 he chooses not to separate the terms ;hen speakin( o4 interethnic relations classes etc. because
he doesn>t see the distinction as bein( 2use4ul to that speci4ic discussion.6. Implications
3his te1t reevaluates the classi4ications ;e take 4or (ranted ;hen de4inin( populations ;ithin di44erent countries. &t poses the
?uestion o4 ;hat e1actl0 race is and reduces it to a social construct that reall0 has no application 4or the betterment o4 a nation as a
;hole. Ethnicit0 and its (roupin( on the other hand have ver0 relevant implications ;hen stud0in( populations and decidin( on
policies 4or various (roups. 2Ethnic in all its 4orms is much more appropriate ;hen considerin( correct terminolo(0 and can be
de4ined b0 both those ;ithin the ethnic (roup and those outside o4 it ;ithout discriminatin( ?ualities. 3here4ore & think
(overnments and census bureaus ;ould be better o44 de4inin( populations in terms o4 ethnicities and not races as this ;ould create
a more e?ual tone in 4ormulatin( policies a44ectin( ethnic minorities and solvin( ethnicall07char(ed political issues.
*Eriksen 3.'. 2Ethnicit0 5ace %lass and Nation te1t 8 in 'utchinson ohn Smith Anthon0 eds. )*++6-Ethnicity. B14ord7Ne; Fork:
B14ord niversit0 ress p. !,79*.
-
7/21/2019 Final AQCI Exampledsa
2/2
Sample Sel assessment orm
Department o4 Western European Studies acult0 o4 Social Sciences %harles niversit0AQCI ASSESS!E"T $%!
Student>s
name:
Leeann Davulis Name o4
assessor:
ulie uhl oer(ensen
Nic '0land
Date: March 6 !""#
Essa0 title:
E1cellent
Cood
Avera(e
oor
Notaccepta
ble
%omments
*- &s the chosen &uotationcentral to the
author>s ar(ument@GG
G
& think that 0our ?uotation is ver0
relevant 4or the understandin( o4 thete1t another (ood ?uotation ;ould
have been about people cate(ori=in(
each other and that race is a social
construct
!- 'as the main argumentbeen 4ull0
understood )includin( its H4or> and Ha(ainst>
sides i4 applicable-@
GG G Fes & think so
9a- &s the &uestionraised
important/relevant/interestin(@
GG
G
&t is relevant because the main theme
is to sho; that ;e can not Iusti40 the
4act that human bein( de4ined each
other to belon( to some certain race
there is no prove o4 that.
9b- 'as this &uestionnot been 4ull0
ans;ered in the te1t@GG
G
8- &s the experiential connection
relevant/interestin(@
G GG & think it is relevant that 0ou talkabout the nited States and ho; 0ou
deal ;ith such issues. Ma0be 0ou can
be a bit more critical to;ards the
s0stem and the ;a0 the make peopleput a label on themselves
A ver0 relevant e1periential
connection ;as used
a- &s the textual connection
relevant/interestin(@
G GG
b- 'as it been cited properl0@ G GGc- 'as it been ade?uatel0 e1plained ho; the
present te1tJs ar(ument contrasts ;ithcontradicts con4irms clari4ies or elaborates
the other te1tJs ar(ument or point@
G
GG
& think 0ou have a (ood
understandin( o4 the similarities andthe di44erences bet;een these t;o
opinions
6- 'ave the implicationsbeen ;ell
understood can the0 have a practical impact
4or polic0 makin(@G
GG erhaps a little more speci4ic ;ouldbe (ood@
'( Expression)*resentationGG 5eall0 ;ell presented and eas0 to
read. Ar(uments made sense.
a- Are the st0le (rammar and (eneral use o4En(lish ade?uate@
G
GGb- &s the A$%& pro4essionall0 presented@ GGG