final car - echadissemination.echa.europa.eu/.../1377-18/section_1-5.pdfa2 of dossier chemical...
TRANSCRIPT
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the makingavailable on the market and use of biocidal products
Evaluation of active substance
Competent Authority Report
Document IIIA
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr or Diatomaceous Earth(61790-53-2)
Product type 18: Insecticides, Acaricides and products tocontrol other arthropods
Final CAR
November 2015
RMS: FRANCE
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT18 Final CAR document IIIA November 2015
Page 2
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the makingavailable on the market and use of biocidal products
Evaluation of active substance
Competent Authority Report
Document IIIA
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr or Diatomaceous Earth(61790-53-2)
Analytical methods and physico-chemicalproperties
Final CAR
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT18 Final CAR document IIIA November 2015
Page 3
Section A1Annex Point IIA, I 1
Applicant
1.1 Applicant Company name:Address:
BIOFA AG
Telephone:Fax number:
++
E-mail address:- XXXX- XXXX
1.2 Manufacturer ofActive Substance(if different)
Manufacturer:Address:
Biofa AG
Telephone:Fax number:E-mail address:
++
1.3 Manufacturer ofProduct(s)(if different)
Location of manufacturing plant:
XXXX
Silicon dioxide Kieselguh1· PT 18 Final CAR document IIIA November 2015
Section At Applicant
Annex Point IIA, I 1
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Materials and metl1ods
Conclusion xxxx
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM ...
Date Give date of comments submitted
Results and discussion Discuss additional relevant discrepancies referring to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's summary and conclusion. Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Reliability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Acceptability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page4
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR- DOC IIIA November 2016
Section A2 Identity Subsection A2.3 MANUFACTURER'S DEVELOPMENT CODE NUMBER Annex Point IIA, II 2.3
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ ... ] Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: A manufacturer's development code number cannot be provided for Diatomaceous earth (DE) since such number is not available for the active substance.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date :xxxx Evaluation of applicant's :xxxx justification
Conclusion :xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Section A2 Identity Subsection A2.4 CAS NO AND EC NUMBERS Annex Point IIA, II 2.4
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ ... ] Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: The CAS number is given for the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) as manufactured. Other numbers, for example EC number or CIP AC number, are not submitted because such numbers are not
I allocated for it.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER M EMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page l
Section A2 Subsection A2.8 Annex Point IIA, II 2.8
Date
Evaluation of applicant's justification
Conclusion
Remarks
Date
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Identity of impurities and additives (active substance)
This infonnation is confidential and therefore provided separately in the confidential part of the dossier.
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
:xxxx :xxxx
:xxxx
COMMENTS FROM ...
Give date of comments submitted
Official use only
Discuss additional relevant discrepancies refening to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's s11mma1y and conclusion. Discuss if deviating/ram view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating/ram view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating/ram view of rapporteur member state
Page 1
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the makingavailable on the market and use of biocidal products
Evaluation of active substance
Competent Authority Report
Silicon dioxide Kieselgurh or Diatomaceous Earth
CAS N°:61790-53-2
Product type 18: Insecticides, Acaricides and products tocontrol other arthropods
Analytical methods and Physico-chemical properties
September 2016
Revised CAR
RMS: FRANCE
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr or Diatomaceous Eruth
Product-types 18 September 2016
Section A2 Identity Subsection A2.8.5 OTHER NUMBERS Annex Point IIA, II 2.8
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: CAS numbers and EC numbers, respectively, are given for the ingredients ofDiatomaceous earth (DE), where possible. Other numbers, for example CIP AC numbers, are not submitted because such numbers are not allocated for them.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page2
Section A2 Annex point IIA, II 2
Subsection (Annex Point)
2.1 Common name (IIA2.1)
2.2 Chemical name (IIA2.2)
2.3 Manufactm·e1·'s development code number(s) (IIA2.3)
2.4 CAS No and EC numbers (IIA2.4)
2.4.1 CAS-No
Isomer 1
Isomer n
2.4.2 EC-No
Isomer 1
Isomer n
2.4.3 Othe1·
2.5 Molecular and structural fo1·mula, molecular mass (IIA2.5)
2.5.1 Molecular formula
2.5.2 Structural formula
2.5.3 Molecular mass
2.6 Method of manufacture of the active substance (IIA2.1)
Identity of Active Substance
Common name: Diatomaceous earth (DE)
Synonym: Kieselgur
Chemical name of the main component of Diatomaceous earth:
Amorphous silicon dioxide
No manufacturer's development code number is available for the active substance.
61790-53-2
Not allocated
Not allocated
xxxx
xxxx
60.08 g/mol (Si02)
The method of manufacture of the active substance is confidential. This info1mation is provided separately in the confidential part of the dossier.
Page 1
Official use only
Section A2 Annex point IIA, II 2
2.7
2.8
Specification of the purity of the active substance, as appropriate (IIA2.7)
Identity of impm·ities and additives, as appropriate (IIA2.8)
2.8.1 Isomeric composition
2.9 The 01·igin of the natural active substance 01· the precursor(s) of the active substance (IIA2.9)
Identity of Active Substance
This infonnation is confidential and provided separately in the confidential part of the dossier.
Representative production batches ofDiatornaceous earth were analysed.
This infonnation is confidential and provided separately in the confidential part of the dossier.
Not relevant
xxxx
Page2
xxxx
xxxx
Section A2 Identity of Active Substance Annex point IIA, II 2
Evaluation by Competent Authorities Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the conunents and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER
Date xxxx Mate1·ials and methods xxxx
Conclusion xxxx
Reliability xxxx Acceptability xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM ...
Date Give date of comments submitted
Results and discussion Discuss additional relevant discrepancies refening to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's summa1y and conclusion. Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Reliability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Acceptability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 3
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remar ks/ G LP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
3.1 Melting point, boiling point, relative density (llA3. I)
3.1.1 Melting point International standard Specification as 1710 °C - N 2 International xx.xx given in Section Program on A2 of dossier Chemical Safety,
2001
3.1.2 Boiling point International standard Specification as > 2200 °C - N 2 International xx.xx given in Section Program on A2 of dossier Chemical Safety,
2001
3.1.3 Bulk density/ International standard Specification as 128-320 g/L - N 2 Anderson, 1990 xx.xx relative density given in Section
A2 of dossier
International standard Specification as 80-256 g/L - N 2 Moyle and Dolley, xx.xx given in Section 2003 A2 of dossier
As a result of the literature data, the density of DE varies between 80-320 g/L, depending on the geographical origin.
3.2 Vapou r pressu re International standard Specification as Vapour pressure is - N 2 Hazardous xx xx (IIA3.2) given in Section estimated to be Substances Data
A2 of dossier OmmHg. Bank, 2006
3.2.1 Henry's Law - - - The active - - -Consta nt substance is not {III 3.2) volatile.
3.3 A ppeara nce (IIA3.3)
Page I
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remar ks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
3.3.1 Physical state Visual inspection Specification as Solid (dust) - N 2 Korunic, 1998 xx.xx given in Section A2 of dossier
3.3.2 Colour Visual inspection Specification as DE varies in colour - N 2 Korunic, 1998 xx.xx given in Section depending on A2 of dossier composition, from white
grey to yellow to red.
3.3.3 Odour Olfactory inspection Specification as Odourless - N 2 Korunic, 1998 xx.xx given in Section A2 of dossier
3.4 Absorption spectra (IIA3.4)
UV/VIS - - - Not applicable - - -because active substance is not soluble in water and organic solvents.
IR xx.xx Specification as xxxx - xxxx xxxx xxxx xx.xx given in Section A2 of dossier
NMR xx.xx Specification as xxxx - xxxx xxxx xxxx xx xx given in Section A2 of dossier
Page 2
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remar ks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
MS - - - Not applicable - - -because active substance is not soluble in water and organic solvents.
X-ray xx.xx Specification as xxxx - xxxx xxxx xx xx xx.xx given in Section A2 of dossier
3.5 Solubility in water International standard Specification as The active substance is - N 2 Korunic, 1 998 and xx.xx (ll A3.5) given in Section insoluble in water. Hazardous
A2 of dossier Substances Data Bank,2006
xx.xx Specification as xxxx xx xx xx.xx xx xx x given in Section x A2 of dossier x
x
3.6 Dissociation constant - - - Not applicable - - -(-) because active
substance is not soluble in water.
Page 3
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remarks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
3.7 Solubili ty in organic xx.xx Specification as xx.xx xxxx xx.xx xxx:x xx xx xx.xx solvents, including given in Section the effect of A2 of dossier temperature on solubility (lllA3.1)
3.8 Stability in organic - - - Not applicable - - -solvents used in b.p. because active and identity of substance does relevant breakdown not include an products organic solvent. (lllA3.2)
3.9 Partition coefficient - - - Not applicable - - -n-octanol/water because active (ll A3.6) substance is not
soluble in water and organic solvents.
Page4
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remarks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
3.10 Thermal stability, xx.xx Specification as xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xx xx xx.xx identity of relevant given in Section breakdown products A2 of dossier (ll A3.7)
3.11 Fla mma bility, - - - Not performed - - -including a uto- because active flammability and substance has no identity of flammable co mbustion products properties. (ll A3.8)
3.12 Flash-point - - - Not applicable - - -(IIA3.9) because active
substance is solid.
Page 5
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remar ks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
3.13 S urface tension - - - Not applicable - - -(llA3. IO) because active
substance is not soluble in water.
3.14 Viscosity - - - Not applicable - - -(-) because active
substance is solid.
3.15 Explosive properties - - - Not performed - - -(ll A3.11) because active
substance does not present any risk for explosion.
3.16 Oxidizing properties - - - Not performed - - -(ll A3.12) because active
substance does not present oxidising properties.
3.17 Reactivity towards International standard Specification as The active substance is - N 2 Moyle and Dolley, xx xx container material given in Section a chemically inert 2003 (ll A3.13) A2 of dossier material.
Not applicable 100% DE Judged from experience - - - - xx xx (statement based on Specification as in use since many years experience) given in Section the active substance is
A2 of dossier not reactive towards the following container materials: HDPE, LDPE and paper.
3.18 Ot her studies
Page 6
Section A3 Physical and C hemical Properties of Active Substance
Subsection Method Purity/ Results Remar ks/ GLP Reliability Reference Officia l (Annex Point) Specification Justification (YIN) use only
Particle size xx.xx Specification as xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xx.xx distribution given in Section
A2 of dossier
Specific surface area xx xx Specification as xxxx xx xx xxxx xxxx xx.xx given in Section xxxx A2 of dossier
Page 7
Diatomaceous earth (DE) PT 18 September 2015
Page 8
Diatomaceous earth (DE) PT 18 • September 2015
Date
Materials and methods
Evaluation by Competent Authorities Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
:xxxx :xxxx
:xxxx
:xxxx
:xxxx
:xxxx
:xxxx
Page 9
Diatomaceous earth (DE) PT 18 September 2015
Page 10
Diatomaceous earth (DE) PT 18 September 2015
Page 11
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM ...
Diatomaceous earth (DE) PT 18 September 2015
Page 12
Date Give date of comments submitted
Results and discussion Discuss additional relevant discrepancies referring to the (sub)heading numbersand to applicant´s summary and conclusion.Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Reliability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Acceptability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the makingavailable on the market and use of biocidal products
Evaluation of active substance
Competent Authority Report
Silicon dioxide Kieselgurh or Diatomaceous Earth
CAS N°:61790-53-2
Product type 18: Insecticides, Acaricides and products tocontrol other arthropods
Analytical methods and Physico-chemical properties
September 2016
Revised CAR
RMS: FRANCE
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr or Diatomaceous Eruth
Product-types 18 September 2016
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.2.1 HENRY'S LAW CONSTANT Annex Point IIA, III 3.2
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ ... ] Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the Heruy's law constant must always be stated for the active substance if it can be calculated.
The Heruy's law constant depends on the vapour pressure and the water solubility of a substance, and express the tendency to evaporate from aqueous solutions.
Since the vapour pressure of Diatomaceous earth (DE) was estimated to be 0 mm Hg and the active substance is not soluble in water, a calculation of the Heruy's law constant is not possible.
But based on the results of vapour pressure and the water solubility it can be concluded that the active substance DE is not volatile and shows no tendency to evaporate from aqueous solutions.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Section A3 Subsection A3.4 Annex Point IIA, III 3.4
Other existing data [ ]
Limited exposure [ ]
Detailed justification:
Physical and chemical properties of the active substance ABSORPTION SPECTRA
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA
Technically not feasible [X]
Other justification [ ]
Scientifically unjustified [ ]
According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements abso1ption spectra (UVNIS and NMR) and a mass spectrum have to be determined for a purified active substance, where relevant.
The solubility of an active substance in water and I or organic solvents is the precondition for the detemlination of absorption and mass spectra.
The active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is not soluble in water (Korunic, 1998) and its solubility in organic solvents is unlikely due to its che1nical structure.
An examination of the structural formula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that DE is a highly stable compound.
xxxx xxxx Since DE shows no solubility in water and I or organic solvents, it is technically not feasible to detennine UVNIS-, NMR- and mass-spectra of the active substance.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ ]
Date
Evaluation of applicant's justification
Conclusion
Remarks
Date
Evaluation of applicant's justification
Conclusion
Remarks
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Give date of comments submitted
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Page 1
I
Official use only
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.6 DISSOCIATION CONSTANT Annex Point (-)
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ ... ] Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the dissociation constant of active substances should always be given if it can be determined. The test should be performed in accordance with OECD guideline 112.
Since the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is not soluble in water (Korunic, 1998), a dete1mination of the dissociation constant does not apply.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR ME MBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBE R STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Section A3 Subsection A3.7 Annex Point IIIA, III 1
Other existing data [ ]
Limited exposure [ ]
Detailed justification:
Undertaking of intended d.ata submission [ ]
Date
Evaluation of applicant's justification
Conclusion
Remarks
Date
Evaluation of applicant's justification
Conclusion
Physical and chemical properties of the active substance SOLUBILITY IN ORGANIC SOL VENTS
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA
Technically not feasible [X]
Other justification [ ]
Scientifically unjustified [X]
Official use only
No studies have been conducted to investigate the solubility in organic XXXX solvents of the active substance Diatomaceous ea1th (DE) due to the following reason.
An examination of the structural formula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance DE is a highly stable compound.
xxxx Due to the high stability of the chemical stmcture, solubility of the active substance in organic solvents is unlikely and a determination therefore not possible.
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transp arency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (sp ecify)
Give date of comments submitted
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating f rom view of rapporteur member state
Page I
Page 2
Section A3Subsection A3.7Annex Point IIIA, III 1
Physical and chemical properties of the active substanceSOLUBILITY IN ORGANIC SOLVENTS
Remarks
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.8 STABILITY IN ORGANIC SOLVENTS Annex Point IIIA, III 2
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the stability of active substances in organic solvents must be stated if the active substance includes an organic solvent.
Since the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) does not include an organic solvent it is justified not to perform a study for detennination of stability in organic solvents.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.9 PARTITIONCOEFFICIENTN-OCTANOL / WATER Annex Point IIA, III 3.6
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [X] Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [ l
Detailed justification: The solubility of an active substance in water and n-octanol is the precondition for the determination of the partition coefficient n-octanol I water.
The active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is not soluble in water (Korunic, 1998) and its solubility in organic solvents is unlikely due to its chernical structure.
An examination of the structural formula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance DE is a highly stable compound
xxxx
Since DE shows no solubility in water and I or organic solvents, it is technically not feasible to determine the partition coefficient n-octanol I water of the active substance.
I Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Section A3 Subsection A3.10 Annex Point IIA, III 3. 7
Other existing data [ ]
Limited exposure [ ]
Detailed justification:
Physical and chemical properties of the active substance THERMAL ST ABILITY
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA
Technically not feasible [ ]
Other justification [ ]
Scientifically unjustified [X]
According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the thennal stability of active substances is to be identified to the point of melting, sublimation or decomposition according to OECD guideline 113. In accordance v.iith this guideline an active substance is not stable at room temperature if either melting point does not remain constant or content of active substance decreased by more than 5% during stability test for 14 days at 54 °C or decomposition or chemical transfonnation is found below 150 °C.
No studies have been conducted to investigate the thermal stability of the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) due to the following reasons:
An examination of the structural formula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is a highly stable compound.
xxxx Fmthennore the melting point of DE is 1710 °C (IPCS, 2001) .
Thus it is unlikely that the active substance does not fulfil the above mentioned criteria of OECD guideline 113.
Stmctural fonnula and melting point do not indicate any thennal instability of DE at room temperature and therefore a test for the1mal stability is scientifically unjustified.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ ]
Page 1
I
Official use only
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.10 THERMAL ST ABILITY Annex Point IIA, III 3. 7
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page2
Section A3 Subsection A3.11 Annex Point IIA, III 3.8
Other existing data [ ]
Limited exposure [ ]
Detailed justification:
Physical and chemical properties of the active substance FLAMMABILITY
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA
Technically not feasible [ ]
Other justification [X]
Scientifically unjustified [X]
No studies have been conducted to investigate the flammability of the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) due to the following reasons:
According to the International Chemical Safety Card (IPCS, 2001) the active substance is not combustible.
An examination of stmctural fonnula es tablishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance DE is incapable of exothennic reaction and shows no flammable prope1t ies.
xxxx Thus the active substance is incapable of exothermic reaction.
Since DE is incapable of exothennic reaction a test for pyrophoric properties (EC method A.13) can be omitted.
According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the auto-flallllllability of solid active substances must be detennined according to EC method A.16. The principle of this method is to record the temperature in the centre of a sample while the temperature of the oven is increased to 400 °C. The temperature of the oven at which the sample reaches 400 °C by self-heating is called the self-ignition temperature. Since the melting point of DE is 1710 °C (IPCS, 2001), a self-heating of the active substance during the test is unlikely.
Therefore it is justified not to perfo1m a test for auto-flammability.
The active substance Diatomaceous eaith (DE) is not soluble in water (Komnic, 1998). Therefore it is scientifically unjustified to investigate the reaction of the active substance with water according to EC method A.12.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ ]
Page 1
I
Official use only
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.11 FLAMMABILITY Annex Point IIA, III 3.8
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's justification xxxx
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 2
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.12 FLASH POINT Annex Point IIA, III 3.9
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements
I the flash point must be provided for liquid active substances whose vapours can be ignited.
Since the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is solid it is justified not to perform a study for determination of flash point.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR ME MBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBE R STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.13 SURF ACE TENSION Annex Point IIA, III 3.10
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [X] Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [ l
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements the surface tension of active substances should be measured using an aqueous solution of sufficient concentration such that any surface activity potential is expressed.
The test must be performed in accordance v.iith EC method A.5 or OECD guideline 115. According to these guidelines substances with a water solubility lower than 1 mg/L need not be tested.
As known from the solubility in water study (Komnic, 1998) the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is not soluble in water. Therefore it is technically not feasible to detemline the surface tension of the active substance.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR ME MBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBE R STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.14 VISCOSITY Annex Point (-)
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements I the viscosity is always required for liquid active substances.
Since the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) is solid it is justified not to perform a study for determination of viscosity.
Undertaking of intended -
I d.ata submission [ l Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.15 EXPLOSIVE PROPERTIES Annex Point IIA, III 3.11
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements
I the test for explosive prope1ties can be exempted when absence of ce1tain reactive groups in the structural formula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance is incapable of decomposing, fonning gases or releasing heat very rapidly.
Due to its chemical structure the active substance Diatomaceous earth (DE) does not contain reactive functional groups, like for example diazo, nitroso, nitro, epoxide, peroxide, azide, chlorate or perchlorate, in its molecular backbone which are known to confer explosivity to the substance or to enhance explosibility prope1ties.
Thus the active substance is incapable of rapid decomposition with evolution of gases or release of heat and does not present any risk for explosion.
Therefore it is justified not to perform a test for explosive properties.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A3 Physical and chemical properties of the active substance Subsection A3.16 OXIDISING PROPERTIES Annex Point IIA, III 3.12
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l
I Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements I the test for oxidising properties need not to be ca1ried out when examination of stmctural fonnula establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the active substance is incapable of reacting exothennically with combustible material.
Examination of the stmctural formula establishes that the active substance Diatomaceous ea1th (DE) does not contain oxidising groups or other chemically instable functional groups in its molecular backbone which are known to enhance oxidizing properties .
Thus the active substance may not react exothennically with a combustible material and does not have oxidising prope1t ies.
Therefore it is justified not to perform a test for oxidising properties.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR ME MBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBE R STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR Doc IIIA November2016
Section A4 Subsection A4.1 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.1
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PURE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE AND IMPURITIES IN THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE AS MANUFACTURED
An analytical method for the determination of the active substance ingredients is available but confidential. Therefore the analytical method is provided separately in the confidential part of the dossier.
Page 1
Official use only
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR Doc IIIA November2016
Section A4 Subsection A4.1 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.1
Date
Materials and methods
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PURE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE AND IMPURITIES IN THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE AS MANUFACTURED
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
COMMENTS FROM ...
Page2
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR Doc IIIA November 2016
Page 3
Section A4Subsection A4.1Annex Point IIA, IV 4.1
Analytical Methods for Detection and IdentificationANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PUREACTIVE SUBSTANCE AND IMPURITIES IN THE ACTIVESUBSTANCE AS MANUFACTURED
Date Give date of comments submitted
Results and discussion Discuss additional relevant discrepancies referring to the (sub)heading numbersand to applicant´s summary and conclusion.Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Reliability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Acceptability Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Section A4.2 Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2 ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE
SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN SOIL
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: xxxx
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion Indicate whether applicant's justification is acceptable or not. If unacceptable because of the reasons discussed above, indicate which action will be required, e.g. submission of specific test/study data
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
1.1 Refer ence
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
2.1
2.2
2.3
Data protection
Data owner
Criteria for data protection
Guideline study
GLP
Deviations
3.1 P1·eliminary treatment
3 .1.1 Enrichment
3.1.2 Cleanup
3.2 Detection
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR
Dete11nination of am01pho11s silica content
1 REFERENCE
NIOSH (Ed.), 2003b, Silica, amorphous. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM),fourth Edition, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA, Method No. 7501 , Issue 3 (published), date: 2003-03-15
No
Not applicable
Not applicable
2 GUIDELINES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
No,
No guideline available.
No
No
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
xxxx
Page 1
Official use only
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR
Dete11nination of am01pho11s silica content
3.2.1 Separation method XXXX
3.2.2 Detector XXXX
3.2.3 Standard(s) XXXX
3.2.4 Interfering xxxx substance( s)
3.3 Linea1ity
3.3.l Calibration range xxxx
3.3 .2 Number of xxxx measurements
3.3.3 Linearity xxxx
3.4 Specificity: xxxx interfe1ing substances
3.5 Recover y rates at xxxx differ ent levels
3.5.l Relative standard xxxx deviation
3.6 Limit of xxxx determination
3.7 P1·ecision
3.7.l Repeatability xxxx
3.7.2 Independent XXXX laboratory validation
4.1 Materials and methods
4.2 Conclusion
4 APPLICANT'S SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The content of amo1phous silica, the main component in the active substance Diatomaceous earth, in workplace air is detennined by means of X-ray diffraction after collecting a dust sample by drawing air at a defined volume through a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filter cassette using a personal sampling pump.
The NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods is a collection of methods for sampling and analysis of contaminants in workplace air. These methods have been developed or adapted by NIOSH or its partners and have been evaluated according to established experimental protocols and performance criteria.
The method is therefore considered to be valid for the detemlination of the amo1phous silica content ofDiatomaceous eait h in air.
Page2
xxxx
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
4.2 .1 Reliability
4.2 .2 Deficiencies
Date
Mate1·ials and methods
Conclusion
R eliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Date
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR
Dete11nination of am01pho11s silica content
Reliability indicator:XXXX
No
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx
COMMENTS FROM ...
Give date of comments submitted
Discuss additional relevant discrepancies refe11ing to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's summaiy and conclusion. Discuss if deviatingfrom view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Page 3
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
1.1 Reference
1.2
1.2.1
1.2 .2
2.1
2.2
2.3
Data protection
Data owner
Criteria for data protection
Guideline study
GLP
Deviations
3.1 P1·eliminary treatment
3 .1.1 Enrichment
3.1.2 Cleanup
3.2 Detection
3.2 .1 Separation method
3.2 .2 Detector
3.2 .3 Standard(s)
3.2 .4 Interfering substance( s)
3.3 Linea1ity
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR
xxxx
1 REFERENCE
xxxx
No
Not applicable
Not applicable
2 GUIDELINES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
No,
No guideline available.
No
No
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
Page 1
Official use only
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
3.3. l Calibration range
3.3.2 Number of measw·ements
3.3.3 Linearity
3.4 Specificity: interfe1ing substances
3.5 Recover y rates at differ ent levels
3.5.l Relative standard deviation
3.6 Limit of determination
3.7 P1·ecision
3.7.l Repeatability
3.7.2 Independent laboratory validation
4.1 Materials and methods
4.2 Conclusion
4.2 .1 Reliability
4.2 .2 Deficiencies
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
4 APPLICANT'S SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
xxxx
xxxx
Reliability indicator: XXXX
No
Page2
xxxx
Section A4.2 Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2
Date
Mate1·ials and methods
Conclusion
R eliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Date
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR xxxx
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
COMMENTS FROM ...
Give date of comments submitted
Discuss additional relevant discrepancies refening to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's summaiy and conclusion. Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Page 3
Section A4.2 Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2 ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE
SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN AIR
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements analytical methods must be submitted for the determination of active substance residues in environmental media, where relevant.
An analytical method for the detemlination of active substance residues in air must be submitted if the active substance is volatile or sprayed or its occwTence in air is othe1wise stated.
xxxx Since the occtmence ofDiatomaceous ea1th in air can be neglected it is justified not to submit an analytical method for the detennination of active substance residues in air.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx
Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks xxxx
Date COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Evaluation of applicant's Give date of comments submitted
justification Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Conclusion
Remarks Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Page I
Section A4.2 Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2 ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTIVE
SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN WATER
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technically not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Technical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements analytical methods must be submitted for the determination of active substance residues in environmental media, where relevant.
xxxx In conclusion no analytical method is necessary for the detennination of active substance residues in water.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion Indicate whether applicant's justification is acceptable or not. If unacceptable because of the reasons discussed above, indicate which action will be required, e.g. submission of specific test/study data
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A4.2 Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification Annex Point IIA, IV 4.2 ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN ANIMAL AND HUMAN BODY FLUIDS AND TISSUES
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data [ l Technica lly not feasible [ l Scientifically unjustified [ l Limited exposure [ l Other justification [X]
Detailed justification: According to the Teclmical Notes for Guidance on Data Requirements analytical methods for the determination of active substance residues in animal and human body fluids and tissues must be submitted where an active substance is classified as toxic or highly toxic. Since the active substance Diatomaceous earth is not classified as toxic or highly toxic no analytical method for its determination in animal and human body fluids and tissues must be submitted.
Undertaking of intended -d.ata submission [ l
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTE UR MEMBE R STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion xxxx Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER M EMBE R STATE (specify)
Date Give date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page I
Section A4.3 Analytical Methods for Detection and Identification BPD Annex Point IHA, ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
IV.I ACTIVE SUBSTANCE RESIDUES IN/ON FOOD OR FEEDSTUFFS
JUSTIFICATION FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF DATA Official use only
Other existing data I I Technically not feasible [ I Scientifically unjustified [ I Limited exposure I I Other justification [X)
Detailed justification: Analytical methods for the determination of active substance residues in/on food or feedstuffs are required if the active substance or the material treated with it is to be used in a manner which may cause contact with food or feedstuffs, or intended to be placed on, in or near soils in agricultural or horticultural use.
xxxx
xxxx
Undertaking of intended -data submission [ I
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
Date xxxx Evaluation of applicant's xxxx justification
Conclusion Indicate whether applicant's justification is acceptable or not. If unacceptable because of the reasons discussed above, indicate which action will be required, e.g. submission of specific test/study data
Remarks
COMMENTS FROM OTHER MEMBER STATE (specify)
Date Giw date of comments submitted
Evaluation of applicant's Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state justification
Conclusion Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Remarks
Page 1
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the makingavailable on the market and use of biocidal products
Evaluation of active substance
Competent Authority Report
Silicon dioxide kiesekguhr or Diatomaceous Earth (DE)CAS N°:61790-53-2
EFFICACY
Final CAR CAR
November 2016
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR November 2016
Section AS
Subsection (Annex Point)
5.1 Function (IIA5.1)
5.2 Organism(s) to be controlled and products, organisms 01· objects to be protected (IIA5.2)
5.2.1 Organism(s) to be controlled (IIA5.2)
5.2.2 Products, organisms 01· objects to be protected (IIA5.2)
5.3 Effects on target organisms, and likely concentration at which the active substance will be used (IIA5.3)
5.3.1 Effects on target organisms (IIA5.3)
5.3.2 Likely concentrations at which the A.S. will be used (IIA5.3)
PT18
Effectiveness against target organisms and intended uses
Insecticide
Acaricide
Target organisms include all kinds of crawling arthropods;
Common English name: Arthropods (Scientific name: Arthropoda)
1. Insects Clnsecta):
Black ant (Lasius niger)
Wood Louse (Porcelio scabe1)
Silverfish (Lepisma sacchmina)
Cat flea (Ctenocephalides felts)
2. Arachnids (Arachnida):
Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae)
All products are produced to protect poultry pens, private households, processing industry facilities, bakeries, glass houses etc.
Diatomaceous ea1th acts through absorption of the lipid layer covering arthropods' chitin protection, which then leads to desiccation and death of the target organism. By destructing the natural water ba1rier, the waxy layer of the cuticle and hence dismpting the functioning of the water preservation mechanism, diatomaceous earth interferes with physiological processes (Reillner, 2009).
Please refer also to the attached summa1·y table A5.3-1.
xxxx
Page 2
Official use only
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR November 2016
Section AS
5.4 Mode of action (including time delay) (IIA5.4)
5.4.1 Mode of action
5.4.2 Time delay
5.5 Field of use envisaged (IIA5.5)
MGOl: Disinfectants, general biocidal products
MG02: Preservatives
MG03: Pest control
MG04: Other biocidal products
Fwt her specification
5.6 Use1· (IIA5.6)
Industrial
Professional
General public
Effectiveness against target organisms and intended uses
Contact action
Since target organisms have to dry out, time schedule depends on species and ambivalent conditions. Under European climatic conditions crawling insects generally are killed within 3 weeks. According to the test report the following contact time is required to achieve relevant or up to 100% efficacy:
xxxx
Product type 18: Insecticide and acaricide, indoor use
xxxx
preventive treatment and control
A thorough coverage of all surface areas with DE dust is essential because places where insects and mites retreat and hide are in the premises and cracks and crevices on constructions. DE can be applied with handheld blow & vacuum guns, resp. appropriate sandblasting guns connected to compressed air or with similar suitable dusting equipment.
A thorough coverage of all surface areas with DE dust is essential because places where insects and mites retreat and hide are in the premises and cracks and crevices on constructions. DE can be applied with handheld blow & vacuum guns, resp. appropriate sandblasting guns connected to compressed air or with similar suitable dusting equipment.
DE is sold in 0.5 - 11 bottles out of which it can be dusted directly . Hand operated dusters with 0.5 1 volume can be used for larger areas and DE is supplied in 2 kg bags for this purpose.
Page 3
xxxx
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR November 2016
Section AS
5.7 Information on the occurrence or possible occurrence of the development of resistance and apprnpriate management strategies (IIA5.7)
5.7.1 Development of 1·esistance
5.7.2 Management strategies
5.8 Likely tonnage to be placed on the market per yea1· (IIA5.8)
Effectiveness against target organisms and intended uses
Application rates under practical conditions produce 100% mo1tality. XXXX
Moreover InsectoSec has a bio-physical mode of action (desiccation) . The development of resistance has never been reported so far under practical conditions and can be regarded as very unlikely.
Application rates under practical conditions produce 100% mo1tality. XXXX
The development of resistance can therefore be regarded as very unlikely.
This infonnation is confidential and provided in the confidential pa1t of the dossier.
Page 4
Silicon dioxide Kieselguhr PT 18 Final CAR November 2016
Section AS
Date
Comments
Conclusion
Remarks
Date
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Reliability
Acceptability
Remarks
Effectiveness against target organisms and intended uses
Evaluation by Competent Authorities
Use separate "evaluation boxes" to provide transparency as to the comments and views submitted
EVALUATION BY RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxx xxxx
xxxx
COMMENTS FROM ...
Give date of comments submitted
Discuss additional relevant discrepancies refening to the (sub)heading numbers and to applicant's summmy and conclusion. Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Discuss if deviating from view of rapporteur member state
Page 5
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
6
Exp
erim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
Func
tion
Fiel
dof
use
envi
sage
d
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Aca
ricid
ePo
ultry
Pens
Inse
ctoS
ec®
Poul
tryre
dm
ite(D
erm
anys
susg
allin
ae)
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
7
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
[con
t.]Fu
nctio
nFi
eld
ofus
een
visa
ged
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
8
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
[con
t.]Fu
nctio
nFi
eld
ofus
een
visa
ged
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Aca
ricid
ePo
ultry
Pens
Inse
ctoS
ec®
Poul
tryre
dm
ite(D
erm
anys
susg
allin
ae)
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
9
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
[con
t.]Fu
nctio
nFi
eld
ofus
een
visa
ged
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
10
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
[con
t.]Fu
nctio
nFi
eld
ofus
een
visa
ged
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Inse
ctic
ide
Food
and
feed
proc
essin
gin
dustr
yfa
cilit
ies(
e.g.
bake
ries,
mill
s,sto
res)
,pr
ivat
eho
useh
olds
,gl
assh
ouse
set
c.
Inse
ctoS
ec(D
Epr
oduc
tofD
r.Sc
haet
teA
G,s
yn.
Silic
oSec
)
Bla
ckan
t(La
siusn
iger
)W
ood
Lous
e(P
orce
liosc
aber
)Si
lver
fish
(Lep
ism
asa
ccha
rina)
Dia
tom
aceo
usea
rth
(DE
)PT
18Se
ptem
ber
2015
Page
11
Tab
leA
5.3-
1:Su
mm
ary
tabl
eof
expe
rim
enta
ldat
aon
the
effe
ctiv
enes
soft
heac
tive
subs
tanc
eag
ains
ttar
geto
rgan
ism
satd
iffer
entf
ield
sofu
seen
visa
ged,
whe
reap
plic
able
[con
t.]Fu
nctio
nFi
eld
ofus
een
visa
ged
Tes
tsu
bsta
nce
Tes
torg
anis
m(s
)T
estm
etho
d/T
estc
ondi
tions
Tes
tres
ults
:eff
ects
,mod
eof
actio
n,re
sist
ance
Ref
eren
ce1)
Inse
ctic
ide
Food
and
feed
proc
essin
gin
dustr
yfa
cilit
ies(
e.g.
bake
ries,
mill
s,sto
res)
,pr
ivat
eho
useh
olds
,gl
assh
ouse
set
c.
Inse
ctoS
ec®
Cat
flea
(Cte
noce
phal
ides
felis
)
1)R
efer
ence
s: