final drainage report for tamlin road rv storage …€¦ · final drainage report for tamlin road...
TRANSCRIPT
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD RV STORAGE
Page i
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORTFOR
TAMLIN ROAD RV STORAGE
Prepared For:
C&M Properties, LLC12748 Barossa Valley Road
Colorado Springs, CO 80921
June 13, 2019Project No. 25134.01
Prepared By:JR Engineering, LLC
5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 235Colorado Springs, CO 80919
719-593-2593
ENGINEER’S STATEMENT:The attached drainage plan and report were prepared under my direction and supervision and are correctto the best of my knowledge and belief. Said drainage report has been prepared according to the criteriaestablished by El Paso County for drainage reports and said report is in conformity with the master planof the drainage basin. I accept responsibility for any liability caused by any negligent acts, errors, oromissions on my part in preparing this report.
Mike Bramlett, Colorado P.E. # 32314 DateFor and On Behalf of JR Engineering, LLC
DEVELOPER'S STATEMENT:I, the developer, have read and will comply with all of the requirements specified in this drainage reportand plan.
Business Name: ROI Property Group, LLC
By:
Title:Address: 2495 Rigdon Street
Napa, CA 94558
EL PASO COUNTYFiled in accordance with the requirements of the El Paso County Land Development Code, DrainageCriteria Manual, Volumes 1 and 2 and Engineering Criteria Manual, as amended.
Jennifer Irvine, P.E. DateCounty Engineer/ ECM Administrator
Conditions:
Table of ContentsPurpose ................................................................................................................................................................ 4General Site Description ................................................................................................................................... 4
Location ........................................................................................................................................................... 4Description of Property ................................................................................................................................. 4
Existing Drainage Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 5Major Basin Descriptions .............................................................................................................................. 5Existing Sub-basin Drainage ........................................................................................................................ 5
Proposed Drainage Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 5Proposed Sub-basin Drainage ....................................................................................................................... 5
Drainage Design Criteria .................................................................................................................................. 6Development Criteria Reference .................................................................................................................. 7Hydrologic Criteria ........................................................................................................................................ 7Hydraulic Criteria ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Drainage Facility Design .................................................................................................................................. 7Four Step Process to Minimize Adverse Impacts of Urbanization ......................................................... 7Water Quality .................................................................................................................................................. 8Erosion Control Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 9Operation & Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 9Floodplain Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 9Drainage and Bridge Fees ............................................................................................................................. 9Construction Cost Opinion..........................................................................................................................10
Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 10References ......................................................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIXAppendix A – Vicinity Map, Soil Descriptions, FEMA Floodplain MapAppendix B – Reference MaterialAppendix C – Hydrologic CalculationsAppendix D – Hydraulic CalculationsAppendix E – Drainage Maps
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD RV STORAGE
Page 4
PURPOSE
This document is the Final Drainage report for Tamlin Road RV Storage. The purpose of this reportis to:
1. Identify on-site and off-site drainage patterns.
2. Recommend storm water facilities to collect and convey storm runoff from the proposeddevelopment to appropriate discharge and/or detention locations.
3. Recommend water quality and detention facilities to control discharge release rates to belowhistoric.
4. Demonstrate compliance with surrounding major drainage basin planning studies, masterdevelopment drainage plans and flood insurance studies.
GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION
LOCATIONTamlin Road Storage Yard, known as ‘the site’ from herein, is currently vacant land located in aportion of Section 20, Township 13 South, Range 65 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian inunincorporated El Paso County, Colorado. The site is located northeast of the Tamlin Road andMarksheffel Road intersection. The site is bound by Tamlin Road to the west and north, vacant landowned by Norwood to the east and south. Stetson Hills Filing No. 3 and 4 is located adjacent to thesite on the west side of Marksheffel Road. A vicinity map has been presented in Appendix A.
Sand Creek East Fork tributary is located approximately ¼ mile east of the site. The ultimate outfallof this drainageway is Fountain Creek. However, there are no existing stormwater facilities locatedon site.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTYThe site is approximately 16.5 acres and is covered with sparse trees and native vegetation. There areno existing structures on the site. An existing dirt road proceeds southeast from Tamlin Road throughthe site to service an existing water tank, located south of the site. There is a ridge that divides thedrainage patterns on the site. Roughly 6.5 acres drains southwest with slopes between 3-10% whilethe remaining 10 acres drains northeast with slopes up to 8%. In the developed condition, the site willbe asphalt drive aisles, parking stalls and a small kiosk.
The site is comprised solely of Truckton sandy loam, which is classified as a Type A soil by theNRCS. Group A soils exhibit a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wet and consist chiefly ofdeep, well drained to excessively drained gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of watertransmission. A NRCS soil survey map is presented in Appendix A.
There are no known irrigation facilities located on the project site. An existing water line (sizeunknown) runs north-south through the site in a 30’ utility easement. Additionally, a gas main (sizeunknown) runs parallel to the water main in a 50’ wide easement. Both existing utilities will remainand existing cover over the utilities will be maintained.
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
MAJOR BASIN DESCRIPTIONSThe site lies within the West Tributary Sand Creek regional sub basin within the Sand Creek MajorDrainage Basin. The “Sand Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study” prepared by Kiowa Engineeringrevised in March 1996, evaluated the Sand Creek Major Drainage Basin, the existing facilitiestherein and provided recommendations for future development. A map of the Sand Creek regionalsub basins is presented in Appendix B.
The Sand Creek Basin covers approximately 54 square miles in unincorporated El Paso County andColorado Springs, CO. The undeveloped portions of the basin are typified by rolling range land withfair vegetative cover associated with semi-arid climates. The headwaters of the basin are in TheBlack Forest and generally topography trends south to southwesterly towards its ultimate outfall intoFountain Creek. Per the Sand Creek DBPS, the Sand Creek East Fork Subtributary runs outside thewestern boundary of the site. This drainageway begins at the confluence with the mainstem of EastFork Sand Creek and runs north to Barnes Road.
Based on the FEMA FIRM Map number 08041C0543G and 08041C0545G, the site does not fallwithin a FEMA defined floodplain and is classified as Zone X, which are areas determined to beoutside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. FIRM maps of the site and surrounding areas have beenpresented in Appendix A.
EXISTING SUB-BASIN DRAINAGEExisting drainage patterns are split on the site by a ridge running north-south. The eastern portion ofthe site drains across undeveloped land to Sand Creek East Fork Subtributary. The western portion ofthe site drains across Tamlin Road and Marksheffel road into Eastview Estates Filing No. 3 stormsewer.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
PROPOSED SUB-BASIN DRAINAGEIn general, runoff generated from the site will be collected and conveyed to one of two full spectrumwater quality and detention ponds, Pond A and Pond B, located on site. It should be noted that allproposed parking and drive aisles will be constructed of gravel. However, there is a possibility of the
owner paving the drive aisles and parking stalls with asphalt in the future. Therefore, all calculations(hydrologic and hydraulic) have been performed per the future asphalt condition. The proposed basindelineation is as follows:
Basin A1 consists of approximately 6.04 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from these areas will sheet flow east towards Water Quality Pond A.
Basin A2 consists of approximately 0.80 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a grass-lined swale and conveyed to Water Quality Pond A.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin A3 consists of approximately 1.07 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a grass-lined swale and conveyed to Water Quality Pond A.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin A4 consists of approximately 1.48 aces of gravel drives, parking stalls, landscaped areas andundeveloped land. Runoff from this basin will follow historic drainage patterns and sheet floweasterly off site and will not be detained in Water Quality Pond A. The portion of this basin that isdeveloped (0.09 acres) will not significantly increase the runoff from this basin in its undevelopedcondition.
Basin A5 consists of approximately 0.59 acres of landscape area and undeveloped land. Runoff fromthis basin will follow historic patterns and sheet flow easterly offsite and will not be detained inWater Quality Pond A.
Basin B1 consists of approximately 4.30 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls, and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a gravel pan located along the basin’s western border. Theasphalt pan will discharge into a grass-lined swale that conveys the runoff to Water Quality Pond B.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin B2 consists of approximately 1.31 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin sheet flows into Water Quality Pond B.
Basin B3 consists of approximately 0.90 acres of landscaped areas and undeveloped land. Runofffrom this basin will follow historic drainage patterns and sheet flow westerly to Tamlin Road. Runofffrom this basin will not be detained in Water Quality Pond B.
Any offsite flows entering the site will bypass the site and not be captured in the water quality anddetention ponds. However, little to no off-site runoff is anticipated to enter the site. Drainage DesignCriteria
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA REFERENCEStorm Drainage Analysis and Design Criteria for this project were implemented from the El PasoCounty “Drainage Criteria Manual” (DCM) and the “Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual” byUrban Drainage and Flood Control District (USDCM).
HYDROLOGIC CRITERIAAll hydrologic data was obtained from the “El Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual" Volumes 1and 2, and the “Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual”Volumes 1, 2, and 3. Onsite drainage improvements were designed based on the 5 year (minor) stormevent and the 100-year (major) storm event. Runoff was calculated using the Rational Method, andrainfall intensities for the 5-year and the 100-year storm return frequencies were obtained from Table6-2 of the Colorado Springs Criteria. One hour point rainfall data for the storm events is identified inthe chart below. Runoff coefficients were determined based on proposed land use and from data inTable 6-6 from the DCM. Time of concentrations were developed using equations from DCM. Waterquality and detention pond will be sized per the full spectrum method presented in Chapter 13 of theDCM. All runoff calculations and applicable charts and graphs are included in Appendix A.
Table 1 - 1-hr Point Rainfall DataStorm Rainfall (in.)5-year 1.50
100-year 2.52
HYDRAULIC CRITERIAThe Rational Method and USDCM’s SF-2 and SF-3 forms were used to determine the runoff fromthe minor and major storms on the site, and the UDFCD UD-Detention v3.07 spreadsheet wasutilized for sizing the water quality and detention ponds as well as outlet structure. Manning’sequation was used to size the proposed drainage swales in this report.
DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
FOUR STEP PROCESS TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE IMPACTS OF URBANIZATIONIn accordance with the Colorado Springs Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 2 this site hasimplemented the four step process to minimize adverse impacts of urbanization. The four stepprocess includes reducing runoff volumes, treating the water quality capture volume (WQCV),stabilizing drainage ways, and implementing long-term source controls.
Step 1: The Tamlin Road Storage Facility development consists paved drive aisles and parkingspaces with lawn areas interspersed within the development which helps disconnect impervious areasand reduce runoff volumes. The IRF worksheet can be found in Appendix C.
Step 2: Water Quality treatment for this site is provided in two onsite full spectrum water quality anddetention ponds. Runoff from the site will be collected in vegetated swales and conveyed to thedetention ponds.
Step 3: Drainage fees will be paid with the platting of the site in order to help fund major drainageimprovements per the “Sand Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study”. These improvements helpstabilize the drainage way.
Step 4: BMP’s will be utilized to minimize off-site contaminants and to protect the downstreamreceiving waters. Site specific temporary source control BMPs that will be implemented include, butare not limited to, silt fencing placed around downstream areas of disturbance, construction vehicletracking pads at the entrances, designated vehicle fueling areas, covered storage areas, spillcontainment and control, etc. The permanent erosion control BMP’s include asphalt drives andparking, storm inlets and storm pipe.
WATER QUALITYDeveloped area within Basin A will be conveyed to Full Spectrum Water Quality and DetentionPond A, located along the site’s eastern boundary. Developed area within Basin B will be conveyedto Full Spectrum Water Quality and Detention Pond B, located in the site’s southwest corner alongTamlin Road. It should be noted that all proposed parking and drive aisles will be constructed ofgravel. However, there is a possibility of the owner paving the drive aisles and parking stalls withasphalt in the future. Therefore, all water quality and detention calculations are per the asphaltcondition.
Pond A has a total of 7.91 tributary acres for total detention basin volume of 1.055 ac-ft. Pond Autilizes a full spectrum outlet structure to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV for a 72-hour period and the 100-yr volume for 73-hr period. The outlet structure will release at less thanhistoric rates. Pond A will discharge into an energy dissipater located along the eastern property line.From here, discharge will maintain the sub-basins existing drainage patterns and discharge to vacantland to the east.
Pond B has a total of 5.61 tributary acres producing a total detention basin volume of 0.592 ac-ft.Pond B utilizes a full spectrum outlet structure to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV fora 72-hour period and the 100-yr volume for 72-hr period. The outlet structure will release at less thanhistoric rates. Pond B will discharge directly into an energy dissipater located along Tamlin Road.
From here, discharge will maintain the sub-basins existing drainage patterns and discharge westacross Tamlin Road towards Eastview Estates Filing No. 3.
EROSION CONTROL PLANThe El Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual specifies an Erosion Control Plan and associated costestimate be submitted with the Final Drainage Report. We respectfully request that the ErosionControl Plan and Cost Estimate be submitted in conjunction with the grading and erosion controlplan and construction assurances posted prior to obtaining a grading permit.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCEIn order to ensure the function and effectiveness of the stormwater infrastructure, maintenanceactivities such as inspection, routine maintenance, restorative maintenance, rehabilitation and repair,are required. The property owner shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance, rehabilitationand repair of stormwater and erosion control facilities located on the property unless another partyaccepts such responsibility in writing and responsibility is properly assigned through legaldocumentation. Access is provided from onsite facilities. An Inspection and Maintenance Manualwill accompany the Final Drainage Report submittal package.
FLOODPLAIN STATEMENTBased on the FEMA FIRM Map number 08041C0543G and 08041C0545G, the site does not fallwithin a FEMA defined floodplain and is classified as Zone X, which are areas determined to beoutside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. FIRM maps of the site and surrounding areas have beenpresented in Appendix A.
DRAINAGE AND BRIDGE FEESThe site lies within the Sand Creek Drainage Basin. See Table 2 below for required drainage basinfees. Per El Paso County processes, Drainage fees are due at the time of platting. This developmentis not proposed to be platted and the fees shown in Table 2 below are for informational purposesonly. The fees are based on an asphalted site and have not taken into consideration pondconstruction credits for the two proposed detention ponds.
Table 2 – Basin Fees
Tamlin Road Storage Yard Drainage Basin Fees
TotalArea
Site %Imperviousness
ImperviousAcres
DrainageFee/Impervious
Acre
BridgeFee/Impervious
Acre
Total Fee -Drainageand Pond
16.5 54.50% 8.99 $18,940 $5,559 $220,246.01
CONSTRUCTION COST OPINIONSee Table 3 below for cost opinion of private storm sewer infrastructure.
Table 3 – Construction Cost Opinion
Private Drainage Facilities
Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Cost12" RCP 80 LF $ 38.00 $ 3,040.0012" FES 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00
FULL SPECTURMOUTLET STRUCTURE 2 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 30,000.00
Sub-Total $ 35,440.0010% Eng. And Contingency $ 3,544.00
Grand Total $ 38,984.00
SUMMARY
The proposed Tamlin Road Storage Facility drainage improvements include storm sewer, waterquality ponds, and engineered outfalls. The proposed development will not adversely affect theoffsite major drainageways or surrounding developments. This report is in conformance with thelatest El Paso County Storm Drainage Criteria requirements for this site.
REFERENCES
1. El Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual (Volumes I & II), El Paso County CO, Colorado,Updated May, 2014.
2. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Volumes 1, 2, and 3), Urban Drainage and Flood ControlDistrict, June 2001.
3. “Hydrologic Group Rating for El Paso County Area, Colorado”, USDA-Natural ResourcesConservation Service, National Cooperative Soil Survey. Web Soil Survey URL:http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. [June 14, 2019]
4. “Sand Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study Final Design Report”, Kiowa EngineeringCorporation, March 1996.
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE FACILITY
Appendix AVicinity Map, Soil Descriptions, FEMA Floodplain Map
A Westrian Company
X:\2510000.all\2513400\D
raw
ings\B
locks\V
icinity M
ap.dw
g, V
IC
. M
AP
, 6/14/2019 9:14:38 A
M, C
S
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
6/11/2019Page 1 of 4
4306
150
4306
220
4306
290
4306
360
4306
430
4306
500
4306
570
4306
640
4306
710
4306
150
4306
220
4306
290
4306
360
4306
430
4306
500
4306
570
4306
640
4306
710
527510 527580 527650 527720 527790 527860 527930
527510 527580 527650 527720 527790 527860 527930
38° 54' 32'' N10
4° 4
0' 5
8'' W
38° 54' 32'' N
104°
40'
39'
' W
38° 54' 13'' N
104°
40'
58'
' W
38° 54' 13'' N
104°
40'
39'
' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS840 100 200 400 600
Feet0 40 80 160 240
MetersMap Scale: 1:2,840 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)
SoilsSoil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating LinesA
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating PointsA
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water FeaturesStreams and Canals
TransportationRails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
BackgroundAerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: El Paso County Area, ColoradoSurvey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 15, 2011—Aug 17, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
6/11/2019Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
97 Truckton sandy loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes
A 17.9 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 17.9 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
6/11/2019Page 3 of 4
USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019.
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
Ü
104°
41'6.
69"W
38°54'30.77"N
104°40'29.24"W
38°54'2.78"N
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, ARRegulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone XFuture Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes. Zone XArea with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
Channel, Culvert, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundary
Digital Data AvailableNo Digital Data AvailableUnmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standardsThe flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 6/14/2019 at 10:33:46 AM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time.This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERALSTRUCTURES
OTHERFEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
1:6,000
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location.
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
Appendix BReference Material
18-470
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
Appendix CHydrologic Calculations
Tributary Area Percent tc Q5 Q100
Sub-basin (acres) Impervious C5 C100 (min) (cfs) (cfs)
A1 6.04 75% 0.70 0.81 9.5 17.7 34.5A2 0.80 59% 0.56 0.71 5.4 2.3 4.8A3 1.07 62% 0.59 0.73 6.6 3.0 6.2A4 1.48 6% 0.13 0.39 9.1 0.8 4.1A5 0.59 0% 0.08 0.35 5.0 0.2 1.8B1 4.30 66% 0.62 0.75 9.9 11.1 22.5B2 1.31 29% 0.32 0.53 9.2 1.8 4.9B3 0.90 0% 0.08 0.35 5.0 0.4 2.7
BASIN SUMMARY TABLE
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 2 7/2/2019
Tributary Q5 Q100
Sub-basin (cfs) (cfs)
1 17.7 34.52 2.3 4.83 3.0 6.24 0.8 4.15 0.2 1.86 11.1 22.57 1.8 4.98 0.4 2.7
POND A IN 22.9 45.5POND B IN 12.8 27.4
DESIGN POINTSUMMARY TABLE
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 2 of 2 7/10/2019
Subdivision: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD Project Name: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDLocation: Colorado Springs Project No.:
Calculated By: NQJChecked By: 0
Date: 7/2/19
A1 6.04 100% 4.54 75.2% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 1.50 0.0% 75.2%
A2 0.80 100% 0.47 58.8% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.33 0.0% 58.8%
A3 1.07 100% 0.66 61.7% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.41 0.0% 61.7%
A4 1.48 100% 0.09 6.1% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 1.39 0.0% 6.1%
A5 0.59 100% 0.00 0.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.59 0.0% 0.0%
B1 4.30 100% 2.84 66.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 1.46 0.0% 66.0%
B2 1.31 100% 0.38 29.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.93 0.0% 29.0%
B3 0.90 100% 0.00 0.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.90 0.0% 0.0%
TOTAL 16.49 54.5%
POND A TOTAL 7.91 POND A 71.7%
POND B TOTAL 5.61 POND B 57.4%
COMPOSITE % IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS
Weighted% Imp.
Basins TotalWeighted %
Imp.Basin ID Total Area (ac) % Imp. Area (ac)
Lawns
% Imp. Area (ac)Weighted
% Imp.
Paved Roads (Asphalt) RoofsWeighted
% Imp.% Imp. Area (ac)
25134.00
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 1 7/3/2019
Subdivision: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD Project Name: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDLocation: Colorado Springs Project No.:
Calculated By: NQJChecked By: 0
Date: 7/2/19
A1 6.04 75.2% 6.04 0.00 0.00 4.54 0.00 1.50 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.70 0.81
A2 0.80 58.8% 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.33 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.56 0.71
A3 1.07 61.7% 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.41 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.59 0.73
A4 1.48 6.1% 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 1.39 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.13 0.39
A5 0.59 0.0% 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.08 0.35
B1 4.30 66.0% 4.30 0.00 0.00 2.84 0.00 1.46 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.62 0.75
B2 1.31 29.0% 1.31 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.93 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.32 0.53
B3 0.90 0.0% 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.81 0.35 0.08 0.35
TOTAL 16.49 54.5% 16.49 0.00 0.00 8.98 0.00 7.51 --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.53 0.68
Minor Coefficients Major Coefficients
C5,A,ROOFS C5,A, LAWNS C100,A. ROADS C100,A,ROOFS C100,A, LAWNS
COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS
Basins TotalWeighted C5
Basins TotalWeighted C100Basin ID
Area A(ac)
Area B(ac)
Area C/D(ac)
AreaRoads (ac)
AreaRoofs (ac)
AreaLawns (ac)
C5,A,ROADS
25134.00
Total Area(ac)
Basins TotalWeighted %
Imp.
Hydrologic Soil Group Land Use
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 1 7/2/2019
Subdivision: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD Project Name: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDLocation: Colorado Springs Project No.:
Calculated By: NQJChecked By: 0
Date: 7/2/19
FINAL
BASIN D.A. Hydrologic Impervious C5 C100 L S o t i L t S t K VEL. t t COMP. t c TOTAL Urbanized t c t c
ID (ac) Soils Group (%) (ft) (%) (min) (ft) (%) (ft/s) (min) (min) LENGTH (ft) (min) (min)
A1 6.04 A 75% 0.70 0.81 180 2.0% 7.8 430 4.3% 20.0 4.1 1.7 9.5 610.0 15.0 9.5
A2 0.80 A 59% 0.56 0.71 68 20.0% 3.0 350 1.5% 20.0 2.4 2.4 5.4 418.0 18.8 5.4
A3 1.07 A 62% 0.59 0.73 70 3.6% 5.1 280 2.3% 20.0 3.0 1.5 6.6 350.0 17.3 6.6
A4 1.48 A 6% 0.13 0.39 65 4.7% 8.5 105 8.0% 10.0 2.8 0.6 9.1 170.0 25.6 9.1
A5 0.59 A 0% 0.08 0.35 10 33.0% 1.8 25 33.0% 10.0 5.7 0.1 1.9 35.0 26.1 5.0
B1 4.30 A 66% 0.62 0.75 140 2.3% 7.8 520 4.0% 20.0 4.0 2.2 9.9 660.0 17.1 9.9
B2 1.31 A 29% 0.32 0.53 150 9.0% 8.4 280 8.0% 20.0 5.7 0.8 9.2 430.0 22.3 9.2
B3 0.90 A 0% 0.08 0.35 27 33.0% 3.0 150 3.3% 10.0 1.8 1.4 4.4 177.0 27.5 5.0
NOTES:
(URBANIZED BASINS)DATAINITIAL/OVERLAND
(Ti)TRAVEL TIME
(Tt)
STANDARD FORM SF-2TIME OF CONCENTRATION
SUB-BASIN tc CHECK
25134.00
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 1 7/2/2019
Project Name: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDSubdivision: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD Project No.:
Location: Colorado Springs Calculated By: NQJDesign Storm: Checked By: 0
Date:
TRAVEL TIME
STREET
Desi
gn P
oint
Basi
n ID
Area
(Ac)
Runo
ff Co
eff.
t c (m
in)
C*A
(Ac)
I (in
/hr)
Q (c
fs)
tc (m
in)
C*A
(ac)
I (in
/hr)
Q (c
fs)
Qst
reet
(cfs
)
C*A
(ac)
Slop
e (%
)
Qpi
pe (c
fs)
C*A
(ac)
Slop
e (%
)
Pipe
Size
(inc
hes)
Leng
th (f
t)
Velo
city
(fps
)
t t (m
in) REMARKS
1 A1 6.04 0.70 9.5 4.21 4.21 17.7
2 A2 0.80 0.56 5.4 0.45 5.06 2.3
3 A3 1.07 0.59 6.6 0.63 4.75 3.0
4 A4 1.48 0.13 9.1 0.19 4.27 0.8
5 A5 0.59 0.08 5.0 0.05 5.17 0.3
6 B1 4.30 0.62 9.9 2.67 4.14 11.1
7 B2 1.31 0.32 9.2 0.42 4.25 1.8
8 B3 0.90 0.08 5.0 0.07 5.17 0.4
Notes:Street and Pipe C*A values are determined by Q/i using the catchment's intensity value.
BASIN B1 FLOW, CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND B.
BASIN B2 FLOW, SHEET FLOW TO POND B.
BASIN B3 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWWEST OFF SITE TO TAMLIN ROAD.
BASIN A2 FLOW. CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND A.
BASIN A1 FLOW. SHEET FLOW INTO POND A.
BASIN A3 FLOW, CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND A.
BASIN A4 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWEAST OFFSITE.
BASIN A5 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWEAST OFFSITE.
DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE
STANDARD FORM SF-3STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN
(RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE)
5-Year
25134.00
7/2/19
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 1 7/2/2019
Project Name: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDSubdivision: TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD Project No.:
Location: Colorado Springs Calculated By: NQJDesign Storm: Checked By: 0
Date:
TRAVEL TIME
STREET
Desig
n Po
int
Basin
ID
Area
(ac)
Runo
ff Co
eff.
t c (m
in)
C*A
(ac)
I (in
/hr)
Q (c
fs)
tc (m
in)
C*A
(ac)
I (in
/hr)
Q (c
fs)
Qst
reet
(cfs
)
C*A
(ac)
Slop
e (%
)
Qpi
pe (c
fs)
C*A
(ac)
Slop
e (%
)
Pipe
Siz
e (in
ches
)
Leng
th (f
t)
Velo
city
(fps
)
t t (m
in) REMARKS
1 A1 6.04 0.81 9.5 4.88 7.06 34.5
2 A2 0.80 0.71 5.4 0.57 8.50 4.8
3 A3 1.07 0.73 6.6 0.78 7.97 6.2
4 A4 1.48 0.39 9.1 0.57 7.17 4.1
5 A5 0.59 0.35 5.0 0.21 8.68 1.8
6 B1 4.30 0.75 9.9 3.24 6.95 22.5
7 B2 1.31 0.53 9.2 0.69 7.14 4.9
8 B3 0.90 0.35 5.0 0.32 8.68 2.8
Notes:Street and Pipe C*A values are determined by Q/i using the catchment's intensity value.
BASIN B1 FLOW, CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND B.
BASIN B2 FLOW, SHEET FLOW TO POND B.
BASIN B3 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWWEST OFF SITE TO TAMLIN ROAD.
BASIN A1 FLOW. SHEET FLOW INTO POND A.
BASIN A2 FLOW. CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND A.
BASIN A3 FLOW, CAPTURED IN SWALE,CONVEYED TO POND A.
BASIN A4 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWEAST OFFSITE.
BASIN A5 (UNDEVELOPED) FLOW, SHEET FLOWEAST OFFSITE.
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGNSTANDARD FORM SF-3
(RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE)
25134.00
PIPE
100-Year
DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF
7/2/19
STREET
X:\2510000.all\2513400\Excel\Drainage\2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm Page 1 of 1 7/2/2019
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
Appendix DHydraulic Calculations
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 10 2019
BASIN A - DRAINAGE SWALE NORTH - Q_100 = 4.8 cfs
TrapezoidalBottom Width (ft) = 1.00Side Slopes (z:1) = 7.70, 4.00Total Depth (ft) = 1.60Invert Elev (ft) = 6700.00Slope (%) = 1.06N-Value = 0.030
CalculationsCompute by: Known QKnown Q (cfs) = 4.80
HighlightedDepth (ft) = 0.53Q (cfs) = 4.800Area (sqft) = 2.17Velocity (ft/s) = 2.21Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.30Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.46Top Width (ft) = 7.20EGL (ft) = 0.61
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Elev (ft) Depth (ft)Section
6699.50 -0.50
6700.00 0.00
6700.50 0.50
6701.00 1.00
6701.50 1.50
6702.00 2.00
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 10 2019
BASIN A - DRAINAGE SWALE SOUTH - Q_100 = 6.2 cfs
TrapezoidalBottom Width (ft) = 1.00Side Slopes (z:1) = 7.80, 4.00Total Depth (ft) = 1.60Invert Elev (ft) = 6700.00Slope (%) = 2.00N-Value = 0.030
CalculationsCompute by: Known QKnown Q (cfs) = 6.20
HighlightedDepth (ft) = 0.51Q (cfs) = 6.200Area (sqft) = 2.04Velocity (ft/s) = 3.03Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.11Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.51Top Width (ft) = 7.02EGL (ft) = 0.65
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Elev (ft) Depth (ft)Section
6699.50 -0.50
6700.00 0.00
6700.50 0.50
6701.00 1.00
6701.50 1.50
6702.00 2.00
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 10 2019
BASIN B - DRAINAGE SWALE - Q_100 = 22.5 cfs
TrapezoidalBottom Width (ft) = 4.00Side Slopes (z:1) = 4.00, 16.70Total Depth (ft) = 2.00Invert Elev (ft) = 6700.00Slope (%) = 4.09N-Value = 0.030
CalculationsCompute by: Known QKnown Q (cfs) = 22.50
HighlightedDepth (ft) = 0.52Q (cfs) = 22.50Area (sqft) = 4.88Velocity (ft/s) = 4.61Wetted Perim (ft) = 14.84Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.62Top Width (ft) = 14.76EGL (ft) = 0.85
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Elev (ft) Depth (ft)Section
6699.50 -0.50
6700.00 0.00
6700.50 0.50
6701.00 1.00
6701.50 1.50
6702.00 2.00
6702.50 2.50
6703.00 3.00
Reach (ft)
Weir Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 3 2019
Pond A Spillway (Q_100_undetained = 29.8 cfs per UD-Detention Peak Inflow)
Trapezoidal WeirCrest = SharpBottom Length (ft) = 100.00Total Depth (ft) = 1.21Side Slope (z:1) = 4.00
CalculationsWeir Coeff. Cw = 3.10Compute by: Known QKnown Q (cfs) = 29.80
HighlightedDepth (ft) = 0.21Q (cfs) = 29.80Area (sqft) = 21.18Velocity (ft/s) = 1.41Top Width (ft) = 101.68
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Depth (ft) Depth (ft)Pond A Spillway (Q_100_undetained = 29.8 cfs per UD-Detention Peak Inflow)
-0.50 -0.50
0.00 0.00
0.50 0.50
1.00 1.00
1.50 1.50
2.00 2.00
Length (ft)Weir W.S.
Weir Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jul 3 2019
Pond B Spillway (Q_100_undetained = 12.8 cfs per UD-Detention Peak Inflow Q)
Trapezoidal WeirCrest = SharpBottom Length (ft) = 20.00Total Depth (ft) = 1.34Side Slope (z:1) = 4.00
CalculationsWeir Coeff. Cw = 3.10Compute by: Known QKnown Q (cfs) = 12.80
HighlightedDepth (ft) = 0.34Q (cfs) = 12.80Area (sqft) = 7.26Velocity (ft/s) = 1.76Top Width (ft) = 22.72
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Depth (ft) Depth (ft)Pond B Spillway (Q_100_undetained = 12.8 cfs per UD-Detention Peak Inflow Q)
-0.50 -0.50
0.00 0.00
0.50 0.50
1.00 1.00
1.50 1.50
2.00 2.00
Length (ft)Weir W.S.
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
Appendix EWater Quality and Detention
Project:
Basin ID:
Depth Increment = ft
Required Volume Calculation 6716.7 Top of Micropool -- 0.00 -- -- -- 0 0.000
Selected BMP Type = EDB 6717 -- 0.30 -- -- -- 380 0.009 53 0.001
Watershed Area = 7.91 acres 6718 -- 1.30 -- -- -- 2,653 0.061 1,547 0.036
Watershed Length = 600 ft 6719 -- 2.30 -- -- -- 5,807 0.133 5,803 0.133
Watershed Slope = 0.050 ft/ft 6720 -- 3.30 -- -- -- 9,841 0.226 13,627 0.313
Watershed Imperviousness = 71.70% percent 6721 -- 4.30 -- -- -- 13,085 0.300 25,090 0.576
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A = 100.0% percent 6722 -- 5.30 -- -- -- 16,257 0.373 39,761 0.913
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B = 0.0% percent 6722.5 -- 5.80 -- -- -- 17,822 0.409 48,281 1.108
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D = 0.0% percent 6723.7 -- -- -- --
Desired WQCV Drain Time = 40.0 hours -- -- -- --
Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths = User Input -- -- -- --
Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) = 0.186 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) = 0.723 acre-feet -- -- -- --
2-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.19 in.) = 0.499 acre-feet 1.19 inches -- -- -- --
5-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.5 in.) = 0.650 acre-feet 1.50 inches -- -- -- --
10-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.75 in.) = 0.788 acre-feet 1.75 inches -- -- -- --
25-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2 in.) = 0.944 acre-feet 2.00 inches -- -- -- --
50-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.25 in.) = 1.108 acre-feet 2.25 inches -- -- -- --
100-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.52 in.) = 1.300 acre-feet 2.52 inches -- -- -- --
500-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 0 in.) = 0.000 acre-feet inches -- -- -- --
Approximate 2-yr Detention Volume = 0.473 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 5-yr Detention Volume = 0.616 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 10-yr Detention Volume = 0.740 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 25-yr Detention Volume = 0.884 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 50-yr Detention Volume = 0.970 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 100-yr Detention Volume = 1.055 acre-feet -- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
Stage-Storage Calculation -- -- -- --
Zone 1 Volume (WQCV) = 0.186 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Zone 2 Volume (EURV - Zone 1) = 0.537 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Zone 3 Volume (100-year - Zones 1 & 2) = 0.332 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Total Detention Basin Volume = 1.055 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Volume (ISV) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Depth (ISD) = user ft -- -- -- --
Total Available Detention Depth (Htotal) = user ft -- -- -- --Depth of Trickle Channel (HTC) = user ft -- -- -- --
Slope of Trickle Channel (STC) = user ft/ft -- -- -- --
Slopes of Main Basin Sides (Smain) = user H:V -- -- -- --
Basin Length-to-Width Ratio (RL/W) = user -- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Area (AISV) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Surcharge Volume Length (LISV) = user ft -- -- -- --
Surcharge Volume Width (W ISV) = user ft -- -- -- --
Depth of Basin Floor (HFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Length of Basin Floor (LFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Width of Basin Floor (WFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Area of Basin Floor (AFLOOR) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Volume of Basin Floor (VFLOOR) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Depth of Main Basin (HMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Length of Main Basin (LMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Width of Main Basin (WMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Area of Main Basin (AMAIN) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Volume of Main Basin (VMAIN) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Calculated Total Basin Volume (Vtotal) = user acre-feet -- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --
Optional User Override1-hr Precipitation
Volume(ft 3̂)
Volume(ac-ft)
Area(acre)
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
OptionalOverride
Area (ft 2̂)Length
(ft)
OptionalOverrideStage (ft)
Stage(ft)
Stage - StorageDescription
Area(ft 2̂)
Width(ft)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE FACILITY
BASIN A
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
Basin A_asphalt_UD-Detention_v3.07.xlsm, Basin 7/3/2019, 9:21 AM
1 User Defined Stage-Area Boolean for Message
1 Equal Stage-Area Inputs Watershed L:W
1 CountA
0 Calc_S_TC
H_FLOOR
L_FLOOR_OTHER
0.00 ISV 0.00 ISV
0.00 Floor 0.00 Floor
2.66 Zone 1 (WQCV) 2.66 Zone 1 (WQCV)
4.77 Zone 2 (EURV) 4.77 Zone 2 (EURV)
5.67 Zone 3 (100-year) 5.67 Zone 3 (100-year)
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
0.000
0.280
0.560
0.840
1.120
0.000
0.105
0.210
0.315
0.420
0.00 1.50 3.00 4.50 6.00
Volu
me
(ac-
ft)
Area
(acr
es)
Stage (ft.)
Area (acres) Volume (ac-ft)
0
100
200
300
400
0
5
10
15
20
0.00 1.50 3.00 4.50 6.00
Area
(sq
.ft.)
Leng
th, W
idth
(ft.)
Stage (ft)
Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sq.ft.)
Basin A_asphalt_UD-Detention_v3.07.xlsm, Basin 7/3/2019, 9:21 AM
Project: Basin ID:
Stage (ft) Zone Volume (ac-ft) Outlet Type
Zone 1 (WQCV) 2.66 0.186 Orifice Plate
Zone 2 (EURV) 4.77 0.537 Orifice Plate
Zone 3 (100-year) 5.67 0.332 Weir&Pipe (Restrict)
1.055 TotalUser Input: Orifice at Underdrain Outlet (typically used to drain WQCV in a Filtration BMP) Calculated Parameters for Underdrain
Underdrain Orifice Invert Depth = N/A ft (distance below the filtration media surface) Underdrain Orifice Area = N/A ft2
Underdrain Orifice Diameter = N/A inches Underdrain Orifice Centroid = N/A feet
User Input: Orifice Plate with one or more orifices or Elliptical Slot Weir (typically used to drain WQCV and/or EURV in a sedimentation BMP) Calculated Parameters for PlateInvert of Lowest Orifice = 0.00 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) WQ Orifice Area per Row = N/A ft2
Depth at top of Zone using Orifice Plate = 4.77 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Elliptical Half-Width = N/A feetOrifice Plate: Orifice Vertical Spacing = N/A inches Elliptical Slot Centroid = N/A feet
Orifice Plate: Orifice Area per Row = N/A inches Elliptical Slot Area = N/A ft2
User Input: Stage and Total Area of Each Orifice Row (numbered from lowest to highest)Row 1 (required) Row 2 (optional) Row 3 (optional) Row 4 (optional) Row 5 (optional) Row 6 (optional) Row 7 (optional) Row 8 (optional)
Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft) 0.00 1.59 3.00
Orifice Area (sq. inches) 1.02 1.10 3.20
Row 9 (optional) Row 10 (optional) Row 11 (optional) Row 12 (optional) Row 13 (optional) Row 14 (optional) Row 15 (optional) Row 16 (optional)
Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft)
Orifice Area (sq. inches)
User Input: Vertical Orifice (Circular or Rectangular) Calculated Parameters for Vertical OrificeNot Selected Not Selected Not Selected Not Selected
Invert of Vertical Orifice = N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Vertical Orifice Area = N/A N/A ft2
Depth at top of Zone using Vertical Orifice = N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Vertical Orifice Centroid = N/A N/A feetVertical Orifice Diameter = N/A N/A inches
User Input: Overflow Weir (Dropbox) and Grate (Flat or Sloped) Calculated Parameters for Overflow WeirZone 3 Weir Not Selected Zone 3 Weir Not Selected
Overflow Weir Front Edge Height, Ho = 4.77 N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Height of Grate Upper Edge, Ht = 4.77 N/A feetOverflow Weir Front Edge Length = 3.00 N/A feet Over Flow Weir Slope Length = 3.00 N/A feet
Overflow Weir Slope = 0.00 N/A H:V (enter zero for flat grate) Grate Open Area / 100-yr Orifice Area = 13.85 N/A should be > 4Horiz. Length of Weir Sides = 3.00 N/A feet Overflow Grate Open Area w/o Debris = 6.30 N/A ft2
Overflow Grate Open Area % = 70% N/A %, grate open area/total area Overflow Grate Open Area w/ Debris = 3.15 N/A ft2
Debris Clogging % = 50% N/A %
User Input: Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction Plate (Circular Orifice, Restrictor Plate, or Rectangular Orifice) Calculated Parameters for Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction PlateZone 3 Restrictor Not Selected Zone 3 Restrictor Not Selected
Depth to Invert of Outlet Pipe = 0.96 N/A ft (distance below basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Outlet Orifice Area = 0.46 N/A ft2
Outlet Pipe Diameter = 12.00 N/A inches Outlet Orifice Centroid = 0.32 N/A feetRestrictor Plate Height Above Pipe Invert = 6.75 inches Half-Central Angle of Restrictor Plate on Pipe = 1.70 N/A radians
User Input: Emergency Spillway (Rectangular or Trapezoidal) Calculated Parameters for SpillwaySpillway Invert Stage= 5.84 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Spillway Design Flow Depth= 0.21 feet
Spillway Crest Length = 100.00 feet Stage at Top of Freeboard = 7.05 feetSpillway End Slopes = 4.00 H:V Basin Area at Top of Freeboard = 0.41 acres
Freeboard above Max Water Surface = 1.00 feet
Routed Hydrograph ResultsDesign Storm Return Period = WQCV EURV 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year 500 YearOne-Hour Rainfall Depth (in) = 0.53 1.07 1.19 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.52 0.00
Calculated Runoff Volume (acre-ft) = 0.186 0.723 0.499 0.650 0.788 0.944 1.108 1.300 0.000OPTIONAL Override Runoff Volume (acre-ft) =
Inflow Hydrograph Volume (acre-ft) = 0.186 0.724 0.499 0.650 0.788 0.944 1.108 1.301 #N/APredevelopment Unit Peak Flow, q (cfs/acre) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.30 0.73 0.00
Predevelopment Peak Q (cfs) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.4 5.7 0.0Peak Inflow Q (cfs) = 4.4 16.7 11.6 15.0 18.2 21.7 25.5 29.8 #N/A
Peak Outflow Q (cfs) = 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 3.5 5.3 5.5 #N/ARatio Peak Outflow to Predevelopment Q = N/A N/A N/A 4.2 4.9 10.5 2.2 0.9 #N/A
Structure Controlling Flow = Plate Plate Plate Plate Overflow Grate 1 Overflow Grate 1 Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 1 #N/AMax Velocity through Grate 1 (fps) = N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.8 #N/AMax Velocity through Grate 2 (fps) = N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #N/A
Time to Drain 97% of Inflow Volume (hours) = 39 67 59 64 68 67 65 64 #N/ATime to Drain 99% of Inflow Volume (hours) = 40 72 63 70 74 74 73 73 #N/A
Maximum Ponding Depth (ft) = 2.59 4.68 3.95 4.45 4.83 5.02 5.22 5.55 #N/AArea at Maximum Ponding Depth (acres) = 0.16 0.33 0.27 0.31 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.39 #N/A
Maximum Volume Stored (acre-ft) = 0.176 0.692 0.475 0.619 0.745 0.808 0.880 1.008 #N/A
Detention Basin Outlet Structure DesignUD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDBASIN A
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
COUNTA for Basin Tab = 1 Ao Dia WQ Plate Type Vert Orifice 1 Vert Orifice 2Count_Underdrain = 0 0.11 (diameter = 3/8 inch) 2 1 1
Count_WQPlate = 1 0.14(diameter = 7/16 inch)
Count_VertOrifice1 = 0 0.18 (diameter = 1/2 inch) Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 2 Drain Time Message Boolean
Count_VertOrifice2 = 0 0.24(diameter = 9/16 inch) 4 1 5yr, <72hr 0
Count_Weir1 = 1 0.29 (diameter = 5/8 inch) >5yr, <120hr #N/A 0
Count_Weir2 = 0 0.36(diameter = 11/16 inch) Max Depth Row
Count_OutletPipe1 = 1 0.42 (diameter = 3/4 inch) WQCV 260 Watershed Constraint Check
Count_OutletPipe2 = 0 0.50(diameter = 13/16 inch) 2 Year 396 Slope 0.040
COUNTA_2 (Standard FSD Setup)= 1 0.58 (diameter = 7/8 inch) EURV 469 Shape 1.04
MaxPondDepth_Error? FALSE 0.67(diameter = 15/16 inch) 5 Year 446Hidden Parameters & Calculations 0.76 (diameter = 1 inch) 10 Year 484 Spillway Depth
0.86(diameter = 1-1/16 inches) 25 Year 503 0.21WQ Plate Flow at 100yr depth = 0.32 0.97(diameter = 1-1/8 inches) 50 Year 523
CLOG #1= 35% 1.08(diameter = 1-3/16 inches) 100 Year 556 1 Z1_Boolean
Cdw #1 = 1.15 1.20(diameter = 1-1/4 inches) 500 Year #N/A 1 Z2_Boolean
Cdo #1 = 1.07 1.32(diameter = 1-5/16 inches) Zone3_Pulldown Message 1 Z3_Boolean
Overflow Weir #1 Angle = 0.000 1.45(diameter = 1-3/8 inches) 1 Opening Message
CLOG #2= #VALUE! 1.59(diameter = 1-7/16 inches) Draintime Running
Cdw #2 = #VALUE! 1.73(diameter = 1-1/2 inches) Outlet Boolean Outlet Rank Total (1 to 4)
Cdo #2 = #VALUE! 1.88(diameter = 1-9/16 inches) Vertical Orifice 1 0 0 1
Overflow Weir #2 Angle = #VALUE! 2.03(diameter = 1-5/8 inches) Vertical Orifice 2 0 0 Boolean
Underdrain Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.20(diameter = 1-11/16 inches) Overflow Weir 1 1 1 0 Max Depth
VertOrifice1 Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.36(diameter = 1-3/4 inches) Overflow Weir 2 0 0 0 500yr Depth
VertOrifice2 Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.54(diameter = 1-13/16 inches) Outlet Pipe 1 1 1 0 Freeboard
EURV_draintime_user = 2.72(diameter = 1-7/8 inches) Outlet Pipe 2 0 0 1 Spillway
Count_User_Hydrographs #N/A 2.90(diameter = 1-15/16 inches) 0 Spillway Length
CountA_3 (EURV & 100yr) = 1 3.09(diameter = 2 inches) Button Visibility Boolean FALSE Time Interval
CountA_4 (100yr Only) = 1 3.29(use rectangular openings) 1 Button_Trigger
0 Underdrain
1 WQCV Plate
0 EURV-WQCV Plate
0 EURV-WQCV VertOrifice
1 Outlet 90% Qpeak0 Outlet Undetained
S-A-V-D Chart Axis Override X-axis Left Y-Axis Right Y-Axisminimum bound
maximum bound
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.1 1 10
FLO
W [
cfs]
TIME [hr]
500YR IN
500YR OUT
100YR IN
100YR OUT
50YR IN
50YR OUT
25YR IN
25YR OUT
10YR IN
10YR OUT
5YR IN
5YR OUT
2YR IN
2YR OUT
EURV IN
EURV OUT
WQCV IN
WQCV OUT
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.1 1 10 100
PON
DIN
G D
EPTH
[ft]
DRAIN TIME [hr]
500YR
100YR
50YR
25YR
10YR
5YR
2YR
EURV
WQCV
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00
OU
TFLO
W [c
fs]
AREA
[ft^
2], V
OLU
ME
[ft^
3]
PONDING DEPTH [ft]
User Area [ft^2]
Interpolated Area [ft^2]
Summary Area [ft^2]
Volume [ft^3]
Summary Volume [ft^3]
Outflow [cfs]
Summary Outflow [cfs]
Outflow Hydrograph Workbook Filename:
Storm Inflow Hydrographs
The user can override the calculated inflow hydrographs from this workbook with inflow hydrographs developed in a separate program.
SOURCE WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK #N/A
Time Interval TIME WQCV [cfs] EURV [cfs] 2 Year [cfs] 5 Year [cfs] 10 Year [cfs] 25 Year [cfs] 50 Year [cfs] 100 Year [cfs] 500 Year [cfs]
3.59 min 0:00:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
0:03:35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
Hydrograph 0:07:11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
Constant 0:10:46 0.20 0.74 0.52 0.67 0.80 0.95 1.11 1.30 #N/A
1.394 0:14:22 0.53 1.99 1.39 1.79 2.16 2.58 3.02 3.53 #N/A0:17:57 1.36 5.12 3.56 4.61 5.56 6.63 7.75 9.06 #N/A0:21:32 3.75 14.06 9.79 12.66 15.28 18.22 21.29 24.89 #N/A
0:25:08 4.38 16.71 11.58 15.03 18.18 21.74 25.47 29.84 #N/A0:28:43 4.16 15.96 11.05 14.34 17.36 20.77 24.34 28.54 #N/A
0:32:19 3.79 14.53 10.05 13.05 15.81 18.91 22.16 25.98 #N/A0:35:54 3.36 12.98 8.97 11.66 14.13 16.92 19.84 23.28 #N/A0:39:29 2.87 11.22 7.73 10.07 12.22 14.65 17.19 20.19 #N/A0:43:05 2.51 9.77 6.74 8.77 10.64 12.75 14.95 17.55 #N/A0:46:40 2.27 8.85 6.10 7.95 9.64 11.55 13.56 15.91 #N/A0:50:16 1.85 7.31 5.02 6.56 7.97 9.57 11.25 13.22 #N/A0:53:51 1.49 5.98 4.09 5.36 6.52 7.84 9.23 10.86 #N/A0:57:26 1.13 4.61 3.14 4.13 5.04 6.08 7.17 8.46 #N/A1:01:02 0.82 3.44 2.33 3.07 3.76 4.55 5.39 6.39 #N/A1:04:37 0.60 2.49 1.69 2.23 2.72 3.29 3.91 4.66 #N/A1:08:13 0.47 1.93 1.31 1.72 2.10 2.54 3.01 3.56 #N/A1:11:48 0.39 1.58 1.08 1.42 1.73 2.09 2.47 2.92 #N/A1:15:23 0.33 1.34 0.92 1.20 1.47 1.77 2.09 2.47 #N/A1:18:59 0.29 1.18 0.81 1.06 1.29 1.55 1.83 2.16 #N/A
1:22:34 0.27 1.06 0.73 0.95 1.16 1.39 1.64 1.94 #N/A1:26:10 0.25 0.98 0.67 0.88 1.07 1.28 1.51 1.78 #N/A1:29:45 0.18 0.72 0.49 0.64 0.78 0.94 1.11 1.31 #N/A1:33:20 0.13 0.53 0.36 0.47 0.57 0.69 0.81 0.96 #N/A1:36:56 0.10 0.39 0.26 0.35 0.42 0.51 0.60 0.71 #N/A1:40:31 0.07 0.28 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.52 #N/A1:44:07 0.05 0.20 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.38 #N/A
1:47:42 0.03 0.14 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.27 #N/A1:51:17 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.19 #N/A1:54:53 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 #N/A1:58:28 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 #N/A2:02:04 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 #N/A2:05:39 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 #N/A2:09:14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:12:50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:16:25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:20:01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:23:36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:27:11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:30:47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:34:22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:37:58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:41:33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:45:08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:48:44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:52:19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:55:55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A2:59:30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
3:03:05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
3:06:41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:10:16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:13:52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:17:27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:21:02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:24:38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:28:13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:31:49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:35:24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:38:59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:42:35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:46:10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:49:46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:53:21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
3:56:56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:00:32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:04:07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:07:43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
4:11:18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:14:53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:18:29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
Summary Stage-Area-Volume-Discharge RelationshipsThe user can create a summary S-A-V-D by entering the desired stage increments and the remainder of the table will populate automatically.
The user should graphically compare the summary S-A-V-D table to the full S-A-V-D table in the chart to confirm it captures all key transition points.
Stage Area Area Volume Volume TotalOutflow
[ft] [ft^2] [acres] [ft^3] [ac-ft] [cfs]
0.00 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00
0.50 812 0.019 170 0.004 0.02
1.00 1,948 0.045 860 0.020 0.03
1.50 3,252 0.075 2,134 0.049 0.04
2.00 4,829 0.111 4,155 0.095 0.07
2.50 6,614 0.152 7,046 0.162 0.09
2.71 7,461 0.171 8,523 0.196 0.10
3.00 8,631 0.198 10,857 0.249 0.10
3.50 10,490 0.241 15,661 0.360 0.19
4.00 12,112 0.278 21,311 0.489 0.23
4.50 13,719 0.315 27,771 0.638 0.27
4.90 14,988 0.344 33,512 0.769 1.50
5.00 15,305 0.351 35,027 0.804 3.15
5.50 16,883 0.388 43,075 0.989 5.43
5.84 17,822 0.409 48,281 1.108 5.56
6.00 17,822 0.409 48,281 1.108 5.56
6.50 17,822 0.409 48,281 1.108 5.56
7.00 17,822 0.409 48,281 1.108 5.56
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
WQCV
EURV
100-YEAR
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
Stage - StorageDescription
For best results, include thestages of all grade slopechanges (e.g. ISV and Floor)from the S-A-V table onSheet 'Basin'.
Also include the inverts of alloutlets (e.g. vertical orifice,overflow grate, and spillway,where applicable).
Project:
Basin ID:
Depth Increment = ft
Required Volume Calculation 6711.74 Top of Micropool -- 0.00 -- -- -- 0 0.000
Selected BMP Type = EDB 6712 -- 0.26 -- -- -- 462 0.011 55 0.001
Watershed Area = 5.61 acres 6713 -- 1.26 -- -- -- 7,015 0.161 3,729 0.086
Watershed Length = 840 ft 6714 -- 2.26 -- -- -- 9,304 0.214 11,958 0.275
Watershed Slope = 0.050 ft/ft 6715 -- 3.26 -- -- -- 10,935 0.251 22,077 0.507
Watershed Imperviousness = 57.40% percent 6715.6 -- 3.96 -- -- -- 11,492 0.264 29,927 0.687
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A = 100.0% percent -- -- -- --
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B = 0.0% percent -- -- -- --
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D = 0.0% percent -- -- -- --
Desired WQCV Drain Time = 40.0 hours -- -- -- --
Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths = User Input -- -- -- --
Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) = 0.106 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) = 0.386 acre-feet -- -- -- --
2-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.19 in.) = 0.264 acre-feet 1.19 inches -- -- -- --
5-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.5 in.) = 0.346 acre-feet 1.50 inches -- -- -- --
10-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.75 in.) = 0.424 acre-feet 1.75 inches -- -- -- --
25-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2 in.) = 0.520 acre-feet 2.00 inches -- -- -- --
50-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.25 in.) = 0.634 acre-feet 2.25 inches -- -- -- --
100-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.52 in.) = 0.766 acre-feet 2.52 inches -- -- -- --
500-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 0 in.) = 0.000 acre-feet inches -- -- -- --
Approximate 2-yr Detention Volume = 0.250 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 5-yr Detention Volume = 0.328 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 10-yr Detention Volume = 0.397 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 25-yr Detention Volume = 0.482 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 50-yr Detention Volume = 0.534 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Approximate 100-yr Detention Volume = 0.592 acre-feet -- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
Stage-Storage Calculation -- -- -- --
Zone 1 Volume (WQCV) = 0.106 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Zone 2 Volume (EURV - Zone 1) = 0.279 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Zone 3 Volume (100-year - Zones 1 & 2) = 0.206 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Total Detention Basin Volume = 0.592 acre-feet -- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Volume (ISV) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Depth (ISD) = user ft -- -- -- --
Total Available Detention Depth (Htotal) = user ft -- -- -- --Depth of Trickle Channel (HTC) = user ft -- -- -- --
Slope of Trickle Channel (STC) = user ft/ft -- -- -- --
Slopes of Main Basin Sides (Smain) = user H:V -- -- -- --
Basin Length-to-Width Ratio (RL/W) = user -- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
Initial Surcharge Area (AISV) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Surcharge Volume Length (LISV) = user ft -- -- -- --
Surcharge Volume Width (W ISV) = user ft -- -- -- --
Depth of Basin Floor (HFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Length of Basin Floor (LFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Width of Basin Floor (WFLOOR) = user ft -- -- -- --
Area of Basin Floor (AFLOOR) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Volume of Basin Floor (VFLOOR) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Depth of Main Basin (HMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Length of Main Basin (LMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Width of Main Basin (WMAIN) = user ft -- -- -- --
Area of Main Basin (AMAIN) = user ft 2̂ -- -- -- --
Volume of Main Basin (VMAIN) = user ft 3̂ -- -- -- --
Calculated Total Basin Volume (Vtotal) = user acre-feet -- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
OptionalOverride
Area (ft 2̂)Length
(ft)
OptionalOverrideStage (ft)
Stage(ft)
Stage - StorageDescription
Area(ft 2̂)
Width(ft)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE FACILITY
BASIN B
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Volume(ft 3̂)
Volume(ac-ft)
Area(acre)
Optional User Override1-hr Precipitation
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
Basin B_UD-Detention_v3.07.xlsm, Basin 7/3/2019, 11:05 AM
1 User Defined Stage-Area Boolean for Message
1 Equal Stage-Area Inputs Watershed L:W
1 CountA
0 Calc_S_TC
H_FLOOR
L_FLOOR_OTHER
0.00 ISV 0.00 ISV
0.00 Floor 0.00 Floor
1.38 Zone 1 (WQCV) 1.38 Zone 1 (WQCV)
2.76 Zone 2 (EURV) 2.76 Zone 2 (EURV)
3.60 Zone 3 (100-year) 3.60 Zone 3 (100-year)
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
0.000
0.175
0.350
0.525
0.700
0.000
0.070
0.140
0.210
0.280
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Volu
me
(ac-
ft)
Area
(acr
es)
Stage (ft.)
Area (acres) Volume (ac-ft)
0
100
200
300
400
0
5
10
15
20
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Area
(sq
.ft.)
Leng
th, W
idth
(ft.)
Stage (ft)
Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sq.ft.)
Basin B_UD-Detention_v3.07.xlsm, Basin 7/3/2019, 11:05 AM
Project: Basin ID:
Stage (ft) Zone Volume (ac-ft) Outlet Type
Zone 1 (WQCV) 1.38 0.106 Orifice Plate
Zone 2 (EURV) 2.76 0.279 Orifice Plate
Zone 3 (100-year) 3.60 0.206 Weir&Pipe (Restrict)
0.592 TotalUser Input: Orifice at Underdrain Outlet (typically used to drain WQCV in a Filtration BMP) Calculated Parameters for Underdrain
Underdrain Orifice Invert Depth = N/A ft (distance below the filtration media surface) Underdrain Orifice Area = N/A ft2
Underdrain Orifice Diameter = N/A inches Underdrain Orifice Centroid = N/A feet
User Input: Orifice Plate with one or more orifices or Elliptical Slot Weir (typically used to drain WQCV and/or EURV in a sedimentation BMP) Calculated Parameters for PlateInvert of Lowest Orifice = 0.00 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) WQ Orifice Area per Row = N/A ft2
Depth at top of Zone using Orifice Plate = 2.76 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Elliptical Half-Width = N/A feetOrifice Plate: Orifice Vertical Spacing = N/A inches Elliptical Slot Centroid = N/A feet
Orifice Plate: Orifice Area per Row = N/A inches Elliptical Slot Area = N/A ft2
User Input: Stage and Total Area of Each Orifice Row (numbered from lowest to highest)Row 1 (required) Row 2 (optional) Row 3 (optional) Row 4 (optional) Row 5 (optional) Row 6 (optional) Row 7 (optional) Row 8 (optional)
Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft) 0.00 0.92 1.65
Orifice Area (sq. inches) 0.86 0.86 2.00
Row 9 (optional) Row 10 (optional) Row 11 (optional) Row 12 (optional) Row 13 (optional) Row 14 (optional) Row 15 (optional) Row 16 (optional)
Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft)
Orifice Area (sq. inches)
User Input: Vertical Orifice (Circular or Rectangular) Calculated Parameters for Vertical OrificeNot Selected Not Selected Not Selected Not Selected
Invert of Vertical Orifice = N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Vertical Orifice Area = N/A N/A ft2
Depth at top of Zone using Vertical Orifice = N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Vertical Orifice Centroid = N/A N/A feetVertical Orifice Diameter = N/A N/A inches
User Input: Overflow Weir (Dropbox) and Grate (Flat or Sloped) Calculated Parameters for Overflow WeirZone 3 Weir Not Selected Zone 3 Weir Not Selected
Overflow Weir Front Edge Height, Ho = 3.00 N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Height of Grate Upper Edge, Ht = 3.00 N/A feetOverflow Weir Front Edge Length = 3.00 N/A feet Over Flow Weir Slope Length = 3.00 N/A feet
Overflow Weir Slope = 0.00 N/A H:V (enter zero for flat grate) Grate Open Area / 100-yr Orifice Area = 27.49 N/A should be > 4Horiz. Length of Weir Sides = 3.00 N/A feet Overflow Grate Open Area w/o Debris = 6.30 N/A ft2
Overflow Grate Open Area % = 70% N/A %, grate open area/total area Overflow Grate Open Area w/ Debris = 3.15 N/A ft2
Debris Clogging % = 50% N/A %
User Input: Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction Plate (Circular Orifice, Restrictor Plate, or Rectangular Orifice) Calculated Parameters for Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction PlateZone 3 Restrictor Not Selected Zone 3 Restrictor Not Selected
Depth to Invert of Outlet Pipe = 0.98 N/A ft (distance below basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Outlet Orifice Area = 0.23 N/A ft2
Outlet Pipe Diameter = 12.00 N/A inches Outlet Orifice Centroid = 0.20 N/A feetRestrictor Plate Height Above Pipe Invert = 4.00 inches Half-Central Angle of Restrictor Plate on Pipe = 1.23 N/A radians
User Input: Emergency Spillway (Rectangular or Trapezoidal) Calculated Parameters for SpillwaySpillway Invert Stage= 3.96 ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) Spillway Design Flow Depth= 0.33 feet
Spillway Crest Length = 20.00 feet Stage at Top of Freeboard = 5.29 feetSpillway End Slopes = 4.00 H:V Basin Area at Top of Freeboard = 0.26 acres
Freeboard above Max Water Surface = 1.00 feet
Routed Hydrograph ResultsDesign Storm Return Period = WQCV EURV 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year 500 YearOne-Hour Rainfall Depth (in) = 0.53 1.07 1.19 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.52 0.00
Calculated Runoff Volume (acre-ft) = 0.106 0.386 0.264 0.346 0.424 0.520 0.634 0.766 0.000OPTIONAL Override Runoff Volume (acre-ft) =
Inflow Hydrograph Volume (acre-ft) = 0.106 0.386 0.264 0.346 0.424 0.520 0.634 0.766 #N/APredevelopment Unit Peak Flow, q (cfs/acre) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.47 0.00
Predevelopment Peak Q (cfs) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.6 0.0Peak Inflow Q (cfs) = 1.8 6.5 4.5 5.8 7.1 8.7 10.6 12.8 #N/A
Peak Outflow Q (cfs) = 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.2 2.3 #N/ARatio Peak Outflow to Predevelopment Q = N/A N/A N/A 5.1 2.5 5.9 2.0 0.9 #N/A
Structure Controlling Flow = Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Overflow Grate 1 Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 1 #N/AMax Velocity through Grate 1 (fps) = N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.3 0.3 #N/AMax Velocity through Grate 2 (fps) = N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #N/A
Time to Drain 97% of Inflow Volume (hours) = 38 67 59 65 69 71 69 68 #N/ATime to Drain 99% of Inflow Volume (hours) = 40 72 62 69 74 77 77 76 #N/A
Maximum Ponding Depth (ft) = 1.33 2.67 2.13 2.50 2.82 3.09 3.27 3.61 #N/AArea at Maximum Ponding Depth (acres) = 0.16 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 #N/A
Maximum Volume Stored (acre-ft) = 0.099 0.363 0.247 0.325 0.400 0.465 0.507 0.596 #N/A
Detention Basin Outlet Structure DesignUD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARDBASIN B
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
COUNTA for Basin Tab = 1 Ao Dia WQ Plate Type Vert Orifice 1 Vert Orifice 2Count_Underdrain = 0 0.11 (diameter = 3/8 inch) 2 1 1
Count_WQPlate = 1 0.14(diameter = 7/16 inch)
Count_VertOrifice1 = 0 0.18 (diameter = 1/2 inch) Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 2 Drain Time Message Boolean
Count_VertOrifice2 = 0 0.24(diameter = 9/16 inch) 4 1 5yr, <72hr 1
Count_Weir1 = 1 0.29 (diameter = 5/8 inch) >5yr, <120hr #N/A 0
Count_Weir2 = 0 0.36(diameter = 11/16 inch) Max Depth Row
Count_OutletPipe1 = 1 0.42 (diameter = 3/4 inch) WQCV 133 Watershed Constraint Check
Count_OutletPipe2 = 0 0.50(diameter = 13/16 inch) 2 Year 214 Slope 0.040
COUNTA_2 (Standard FSD Setup)= 1 0.58 (diameter = 7/8 inch) EURV 268 Shape 2.89
MaxPondDepth_Error? FALSE 0.67(diameter = 15/16 inch) 5 Year 251Hidden Parameters & Calculations 0.76 (diameter = 1 inch) 10 Year 283 Spillway Depth
0.86(diameter = 1-1/16 inches) 25 Year 310 0.33WQ Plate Flow at 100yr depth = 0.20 0.97(diameter = 1-1/8 inches) 50 Year 328
CLOG #1= 35% 1.08(diameter = 1-3/16 inches) 100 Year 362 1 Z1_Boolean
Cdw #1 = 1.15 1.20(diameter = 1-1/4 inches) 500 Year #N/A 1 Z2_Boolean
Cdo #1 = 1.07 1.32(diameter = 1-5/16 inches) Zone3_Pulldown Message 1 Z3_Boolean
Overflow Weir #1 Angle = 0.000 1.45(diameter = 1-3/8 inches) 1 Opening Message
CLOG #2= #VALUE! 1.59(diameter = 1-7/16 inches) Draintime Running
Cdw #2 = #VALUE! 1.73(diameter = 1-1/2 inches) Outlet Boolean Outlet Rank Total (1 to 4)
Cdo #2 = #VALUE! 1.88(diameter = 1-9/16 inches) Vertical Orifice 1 0 0 1
Overflow Weir #2 Angle = #VALUE! 2.03(diameter = 1-5/8 inches) Vertical Orifice 2 0 0 Boolean
Underdrain Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.20(diameter = 1-11/16 inches) Overflow Weir 1 1 1 0 Max Depth
VertOrifice1 Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.36(diameter = 1-3/4 inches) Overflow Weir 2 0 0 0 500yr Depth
VertOrifice2 Q at 100yr depth = 0.00 2.54(diameter = 1-13/16 inches) Outlet Pipe 1 1 1 0 Freeboard
EURV_draintime_user = 2.72(diameter = 1-7/8 inches) Outlet Pipe 2 0 0 1 Spillway
Count_User_Hydrographs #N/A 2.90(diameter = 1-15/16 inches) 0 Spillway Length
CountA_3 (EURV & 100yr) = 1 3.09(diameter = 2 inches) Button Visibility Boolean TRUE Time Interval
CountA_4 (100yr Only) = 1 3.29(use rectangular openings) 1 Button_Trigger
0 Underdrain
1 WQCV Plate
0 EURV-WQCV Plate
0 EURV-WQCV VertOrifice
1 Outlet 90% Qpeak0 Outlet Undetained
S-A-V-D Chart Axis Override X-axis Left Y-Axis Right Y-Axisminimum bound
maximum bound
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.1 1 10
FLO
W [
cfs]
TIME [hr]
500YR IN
500YR OUT
100YR IN
100YR OUT
50YR IN
50YR OUT
25YR IN
25YR OUT
10YR IN
10YR OUT
5YR IN
5YR OUT
2YR IN
2YR OUT
EURV IN
EURV OUT
WQCV IN
WQCV OUT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0.1 1 10 100
PON
DIN
G D
EPTH
[ft]
DRAIN TIME [hr]
500YR
100YR
50YR
25YR
10YR
5YR
2YR
EURV
WQCV
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50
OU
TFLO
W [c
fs]
AREA
[ft^
2], V
OLU
ME
[ft^
3]
PONDING DEPTH [ft]
User Area [ft^2]
Interpolated Area [ft^2]
Summary Area [ft^2]
Volume [ft^3]
Summary Volume [ft^3]
Outflow [cfs]
Summary Outflow [cfs]
Outflow Hydrograph Workbook Filename:
Storm Inflow Hydrographs
The user can override the calculated inflow hydrographs from this workbook with inflow hydrographs developed in a separate program.
User-Defined SOURCE WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK #N/A
Time Interval TIME WQCV [cfs] EURV [cfs] 2 Year [cfs] 5 Year [cfs] 10 Year [cfs] 25 Year [cfs] 50 Year [cfs] 100 Year [cfs] 500 Year [cfs]
4.96 min 0:00:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
0:04:58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
Hydrograph 0:09:55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
Constant 0:14:53 0.08 0.29 0.20 0.26 0.32 0.39 0.47 0.56 #N/A
1.008 0:19:50 0.22 0.78 0.54 0.70 0.85 1.04 1.27 1.52 #N/A0:24:48 0.57 2.01 1.38 1.80 2.20 2.68 3.25 3.91 #N/A0:29:46 1.57 5.51 3.80 4.95 6.04 7.38 8.94 10.75 #N/A
0:34:43 1.82 6.50 4.47 5.83 7.13 8.73 10.61 12.80 #N/A0:39:41 1.73 6.19 4.25 5.55 6.79 8.33 10.12 12.22 #N/A
0:44:38 1.57 5.64 3.87 5.05 6.18 7.58 9.22 11.12 #N/A0:49:36 1.39 5.02 3.44 4.50 5.51 6.76 8.23 9.94 #N/A0:54:34 1.18 4.32 2.95 3.87 4.74 5.83 7.11 8.59 #N/A0:59:31 1.04 3.77 2.58 3.37 4.14 5.08 6.19 7.48 #N/A1:04:29 0.94 3.41 2.33 3.05 3.75 4.60 5.61 6.78 #N/A1:09:26 0.76 2.80 1.91 2.50 3.08 3.79 4.63 5.61 #N/A1:14:24 0.61 2.28 1.54 2.03 2.51 3.09 3.78 4.59 #N/A1:19:22 0.45 1.74 1.17 1.55 1.92 2.37 2.91 3.54 #N/A1:24:19 0.32 1.28 0.86 1.14 1.42 1.76 2.17 2.64 #N/A1:29:17 0.24 0.94 0.63 0.83 1.03 1.28 1.57 1.91 #N/A1:34:14 0.19 0.73 0.49 0.65 0.80 0.99 1.22 1.48 #N/A1:39:12 0.16 0.60 0.40 0.54 0.66 0.82 1.00 1.22 #N/A1:44:10 0.13 0.51 0.34 0.46 0.56 0.69 0.85 1.03 #N/A1:49:07 0.12 0.45 0.30 0.40 0.49 0.61 0.75 0.90 #N/A
1:54:05 0.11 0.40 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.55 0.67 0.81 #N/A1:59:02 0.10 0.37 0.25 0.33 0.41 0.51 0.62 0.75 #N/A2:04:00 0.07 0.27 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.37 0.45 0.55 #N/A2:08:58 0.05 0.20 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.40 #N/A2:13:55 0.04 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.30 #N/A2:18:53 0.03 0.11 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.22 #N/A2:23:50 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 #N/A
2:28:48 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 #N/A2:33:46 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 #N/A2:38:43 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 #N/A2:43:41 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 #N/A2:48:38 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 #N/A2:53:36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 #N/A2:58:34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:03:31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:08:29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:13:26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:18:24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:23:22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:28:19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:33:17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:38:14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:43:12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:48:10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:53:07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A3:58:05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:03:02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:08:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
4:12:58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
4:17:55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:22:53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:27:50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:32:48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:37:46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:42:43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:47:41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:52:38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A4:57:36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:02:34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:07:31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:12:29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:17:26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:22:24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
5:27:22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:32:19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:37:17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:42:14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
5:47:12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:52:10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A5:57:07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #N/A
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
Summary Stage-Area-Volume-Discharge RelationshipsThe user can create a summary S-A-V-D by entering the desired stage increments and the remainder of the table will populate automatically.
The user should graphically compare the summary S-A-V-D table to the full S-A-V-D table in the chart to confirm it captures all key transition points.
Stage Area Area Volume Volume TotalOutflow
[ft] [ft^2] [acres] [ft^3] [ac-ft] [cfs]
0.00 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00
0.50 1,969 0.045 340 0.008 0.02
1.00 5,246 0.120 2,143 0.049 0.04
1.38 7,267 0.167 4,584 0.105 0.05
1.50 7,541 0.173 5,472 0.126 0.06
2.00 8,686 0.199 9,529 0.219 0.11
2.50 9,695 0.223 14,238 0.327 0.14
2.76 10,120 0.232 16,814 0.386 0.16
3.00 10,511 0.241 19,289 0.443 0.17
3.50 11,126 0.255 24,725 0.568 2.28
3.60 11,206 0.257 25,841 0.593 2.31
3.96 11,492 0.264 29,927 0.687 2.40
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
EURV
100-YEAR
Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design
Stage - StorageDescription
WQCV
For best results, include thestages of all grade slopechanges (e.g. ISV and Floor)from the S-A-V table onSheet 'Basin'.
Also include the inverts of alloutlets (e.g. vertical orifice,overflow grate, and spillway,where applicable).
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FORTAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
Appendix FDrainage Maps
A Westrian Company
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE YARD
PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP
X:\2510000.all\2513400\D
raw
ings\S
heet D
wgs\D
rainage\D
rainage M
ap.dw
g, D
rainage M
ap, 7/25/2019 1:27:07 P
M, C
S
Drainage Report- Final_v1.pdf Markup Summary
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 1:50:20 PMColor:
which is it? gravel or asphalt?
Callout (25)
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 8Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 10:47:14 PMColor:
Please indicate and analyze if the downstreamswale is adequate due to the concentrateddischarge from the pond.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 8Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 10:53:21 PMColor:
Assuming the dissipater is located in the ditchalong tamlin road, Please analyze if the ditch isadequate and has the capacity for this concentratedischarge from the pond.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 51Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 10:55:10 PMColor:
The ultimate discharge of the stormwater runofffrom the development must be to a suitable outfall.Please analyze the downstream swale/ditch. Is itadequate for the concentrated discharge of thepond? Is any protection/improvements required?
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 2:34:28 PMColor:
?
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 2:35:21 PMColor:
Please revise this paragraph regarding the offsiteflows entering the site. It appears that you arestating that offsite flow will enter the site butbypass the ponds yet the last sentence indicatesthat offsite flow will not enter the site. If offsite flowis entering the site from where is this flow comingfrom and how will it bypass the ponds.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:52:06 PMColor:
Per ECM I.7.1.C.1 up to 20%, not to exceed 1 acreof the applicable development site may be omittedfrom water quality. The cumulative landdisturbance proposed in basins A4, A5, and B3 willexceed 1 acre. Please revise your designaccordingly to comply with County criteria.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:52:09 PMColor:
Please indicate the ponds as Full Spectrumdetention ponds.
undeveloped land. Runoff from this basin will follow historic drainage easterly off site and will not be detained in Water Quality Pond A. The podeveloped (0.09 acres) will not significantly increase the runoff from thiscondition.
Basin A5 consists of approximately 0.59 acres of landscape area and undevthis basin will follow historic patterns and sheet flow easterly offsite andWater Quality Pond A.
Basin B1 consists of approximately 4.30 acres of gravel drives, parking staRunoff from this basin is collected in a gravel pan located along the basasphalt pan will discharge into a grass-lined swale that conveys the runoff The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix
Basin B2 consists of approximately 1.31 acres of gravel drives, parking staRunoff from this basin sheet flows into Water Quality Pond B.
Basin B3 consists of approximately 0.90 acres of landscaped areas and u
which is it? gravel orasphalt?
eceiving waters. Site specific temporary source control BMPs that will be implemented include, butare not limited to, silt fencing placed around downstream areas of disturbance, construction vehicleracking pads at the entrances, designated vehicle fueling areas, covered storage areas, spill
containment and control, etc. The permanent erosion control BMP’s include asphalt drives andparking, storm inlets and storm pipe.
WATER QUALITYDeveloped area within Basin A will be conveyed to Full Spectrum Water Quality and DetentionPond A, located along the site’s eastern boundary. Developed area within Basin B will be conveyedo Full Spectrum Water Quality and Detention Pond B, located in the site’s southwest corner along
Tamlin Road. It should be noted that all proposed parking and drive aisles will be constructed ofgravel. However, there is a possibility of the owner paving the drive aisles and parking stalls withasphalt in the future. Therefore, all water quality and detention calculations are per the asphaltcondition.
Pond A has a total of 7.91 tributary acres for total detention basin volume of 1.055 ac-ft. Pond Autilizes a full spectrum outlet structure to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV for a 72-hour period and the 100-yr volume for 73-hr period. The outlet structure will release at less thanhistoric rates. Pond A will discharge into an energy dissipater located along the eastern property line.From here, discharge will maintain the sub-basins existing drainage patterns and discharge to vacantand to the east.
Pond B has a total of 5.61 tributary acres producing a total detention basin volume of 0.592 ac-ft.Pond B utilizes a full spectrum outlet structure to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV for
Please indicate and analyze if the downstreamswale is adequate due to the concentrateddischarge from the pond.
historic rates. Pond A will discharge into an energy dissipater located aloFrom here, discharge will maintain the sub-basins existing drainage patteland to the east.
Pond B has a total of 5.61 tributary acres producing a total detention bPond B utilizes a full spectrum outlet structure to detain the WQCV for a a 72-hour period and the 100-yr volume for 72-hr period. The outlet struchistoric rates. Pond B will discharge directly into an energy dissipater l
Assuming the dissipater is located in the ditchalong tamlin road, Please analyze if the ditch isadequate and has the capacity for this concentratedischarge from the pond.
The ultimate discharge of the stormwaterrunoff from the development must be toa suitable outfall. Please analyze thedownstream swale/ditch. Is it adequatefor the concentrated discharge of thepond? Is any protection/improvementsrequired?
oped land. Runoffmlin Road. Runoff
water quality and Drainage Design
?
asphalt pan will discharge into a grass-lined swale that conveys the runoff to Water Quality Pond B.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin B2 consists of approximately 1.31 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin sheet flows into Water Quality Pond B.
Basin B3 consists of approximately 0.90 acres of landscaped areas and undeveloped land. Runofffrom this basin will follow historic drainage patterns and sheet flow westerly to Tamlin Road. Runofffrom this basin will not be detained in Water Quality Pond B.
Any offsite flows entering the site will bypass the site and not be captured in the water quality anddetention ponds. However, little to no off-site runoff is anticipated to enter the site. Drainage DesignCriteria Please revise this paragraph regarding the offsite flows entering the site. It
appears that you are stating that offsite flow will enter the site but bypass theponds yet the last sentence indicates that offsite flow will not enter the site. Ifoffsite flow is entering the site from where is this flow coming from and howwill it bypass the ponds.
owner paving the drive aisles and parking stalls with asphalt in the future. Therefore, all calculations(hydrologic and hydraulic) have been performed per the future asphalt condition. The proposed basindelineation is as follows:
Basin A1 consists of approximately 6.04 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from these areas will sheet flow east towards Water Quality Pond A.
Basin A2 consists of approximately 0.80 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a grass-lined swale and conveyed to Water Quality Pond A.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin A3 consists of approximately 1.07 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a grass-lined swale and conveyed to Water Quality Pond A.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin A4 consists of approximately 1.48 aces of gravel drives, parking stalls, landscaped areas andundeveloped land. Runoff from this basin will follow historic drainage patterns and sheet floweasterly off site and will not be detained in Water Quality Pond A. The portion of this basin that isdeveloped (0.09 acres) will not significantly increase the runoff from this basin in its undevelopedcondition.
Basin A5 consists of approximately 0.59 acres of landscape area and undeveloped land. Runoff from
Per ECM I.7.1.C.1 up to 20%, not to exceed 1 acre of the applicable development site may beomitted from water quality. The cumulative land disturbance proposed in basins A4, A5, andB3 will exceed 1 acre. Please revise your design accordingly to comply with County criteria.
alls with asphalt in the future. Therefore, all calculationsmed per the future asphalt condition. The proposed basin
es of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.owards Water Quality Pond A.
es of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.ss-lined swale and conveyed to Water Quality Pond A.wale is presented in Appendix D.
es of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.
Please indicate the ponds as FullSpectrum detention ponds.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 8Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:57:17 PMColor:
gravel
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 8Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:05:54 PMColor:
Please revise step 3 as no drainage fees are dueas this is a site development plan application. Thisshould be relative to the project site.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 8Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:13:27 PMColor:
As designed, pond B drains in 76 hrs per thesubmitted calculation.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 9Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:18:25 PMColor:
Please indicate what conveys this flow across thetamlin road/marksheffel intersection to theeastview estates land
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 9Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:18:37 PMColor:
bridge
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 46Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:25:29 PMColor:
Adjust the design so that the release is equal to orless than pre-development
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 40Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:26:23 PMColor:
Adjust the design so that the release is equal to orless than pre-development
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 5Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 6:06:49 PMColor:
Provide an existing drainage plan showingappropriate basins and design points(Q) of thehistoric drainage flow patterns.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 51Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 6:14:12 PMColor:
Provide a legend for the basin call-outs information
Road Storage Facility development consists paved dris interspersed within the development which helps disconumes. The IRF worksheet can be found in Appendix C.
treatment for this site is provided in two onsite full spect
gravel
Step 1: The Tamlin Road Storage Facility development consists paved drive aisles and parkingspaces with lawn areas interspersed within the development which helps disconnect impervious areasand reduce runoff volumes. The IRF worksheet can be found in Appendix C.
Step 2: Water Quality treatment for this site is provided in two onsite full spectrum water quality anddetention ponds. Runoff from the site will be collected in vegetated swales and conveyed to thedetention ponds.
Step 3: Drainage fees will be paid with the platting of the site in order to help fund major drainageimprovements per the “Sand Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study”. These improvements helpstabilize the drainage way.
Step 4: BMP’s will be utilized to minimize off-site contaminants and to protect the downstreamreceiving waters. Site specific temporary source control BMPs that will be implemented include, butare not limited to, silt fencing placed around downstream areas of disturbance, construction vehicletracking pads at the entrances, designated vehicle fueling areas, covered storage areas, spillcontainment and control, etc. The permanent erosion control BMP’s include asphalt drives andparking, storm inlets and storm pipe.
WATER QUALITYDeveloped area within Basin A will be conveyed to Full Spectrum Water Quality and DetentionPond A, located along the site’s eastern boundary. Developed area within Basin B will be conveyedto Full Spectrum Water Quality and Detention Pond B, located in the site’s southwest corner along
Please revise step 3 as no drainage fees are due as thisis a site development plan application. This should berelative to the project site.
ary acres for total detention basin volume of 1.055 ac-ft. Pond Ature to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV for a 72-
me for 73-hr period. The outlet structure will release at less thange into an energy dissipater located along the eastern property line.n the sub-basins existing drainage patterns and discharge to vacant
ry acres producing a total detention basin volume of 0.592 ac-ft.let structure to detain the WQCV for a 40-hr period, the EURV forlume for 72-hr period. The outlet structure will release at less thange directly into an energy dissipater located along Tamlin Road.
As designed, pond B drains in 76hrs per the submitted calculation.
ischarge will maintain the sub-basins existing drainage patterns and discharge west Road towards Eastview Estates Filing No. 3.
CONTROL PLANCounty Drainage Criteria Manual specifies an Erosion Control Plan and associated costubmitted with the Final Drainage Report. We respectfully request that the Erosionand Cost Estimate be submitted in conjunction with the grading and erosion controltruction assurances posted prior to obtaining a grading permit.
N & MAINTENANCEnsure the function and effectiveness of the stormwater infrastructure, maintenance
h as inspection, routine maintenance, restorative maintenance, rehabilitation and repair,The property owner shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance, rehabilitationstormwater and erosion control facilities located on the property unless another party responsibility in writing and responsibility is properly assigned through legal
Please indicate what conveys this flow across the tamlinroad/marksheffel intersection to the eastview estates land
taken into consideration pond
in Fees
BridgeImperviousAcre
Total Fee -Drainageand Pond
$5,559 $220,246.01
bridge
0.264 0.346 0.424 0.520 0.634 0.766 0.000
0.264 0.346 0.424 0.520 0.634 0.766 #N/A0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.47 0.000.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.6 0.04.5 5.8 7.1 8.7 10.6 12.8 #N/A0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.2 2.3 #N/AN/A 5.1 2.5 5.9 2.0 0.9 #N/APlate Plate Plate Overflow Grate 1 Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 1 #N/AN/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.3 0.3 #N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #N/A59 65 69 71 69 68 #N/A62 69 74 77 77 76 #N/A
2.13 2.50 2.82 3.09 3.27 3.61 #N/A0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 #N/A
0.247 0.325 0.400 0.465 0.507 0.596 #N/A
Adjust the design so that the release isequal to or less than pre-development
0.499 0.650 0.788 0.944 1.108 1.300 0.00
0.499 0.650 0.788 0.944 1.108 1.301 #N/0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.30 0.73 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.4 5.7 0.0
11.6 15.0 18.2 21.7 25.5 29.8 #N/0.2 0.3 0.7 3.5 5.3 5.5 #N/N/A 4.2 4.9 10.5 2.2 0.9 #N/Plate Plate Overflow Grate 1 Overflow Grate 1 Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 1 #N/N/A N/A 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.8 #N/N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A #N/59 64 68 67 65 64 #N/63 70 74 74 73 73 #N/
3.95 4.45 4.83 5.02 5.22 5.55 #N/0.27 0.31 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.39 #N/
0.475 0.619 0.745 0.808 0.880 1.008 #N/
Adjust the design so that the release isequal to or less than pre-development
iated with semi-arid climates. The headwaters of the basin are in Thetopography trends south to southwesterly towards its ultimate outfall intond Creek DBPS, the Sand Creek East Fork Subtributary runs outside thee. This drainageway begins at the confluence with the mainstem of East
north to Barnes Road.
M Map number 08041C0543G and 08041C0545G, the site does not falloodplain and is classified as Zone X, which are areas determined to beance floodplain. FIRM maps of the site and surrounding areas have been
DRAINAGEare split on the site by a ridge running north-south. The eastern portion ofeloped land to Sand Creek East Fork Subtributary. The western portion ofin Road and Marksheffel road into Eastview Estates Filing No. 3 storm
NAGE CONDITIONS
Provide an existing drainage plan showingappropriate basins and design points(Q) ofthe historic drainage flow patterns.
Provide a legend forthe basin call-outsinformation
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 51Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 6:20:55 PMColor:
Please revise the line type of the parking stalls sothat they are lighter (gray) to make the drawingmore clear.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 51Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 8:28:54 PMColor:
Please label basin B drainage swale on the map.
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 34Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 8:41:59 PMColor:
Provide protection for this grass swale as thevelocity is exceeding the permissible velocity
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 38Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 8:56:11 PMColor:
update accordingly per comments on compositeimpervious calculation
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 44Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 9:47:55 PMColor:
update accordingly per comments on compositeimpervious calculation
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 18Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:37:18 PMColor:
SITE
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 17Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:39:02 PMColor:
SITE
Subject: CalloutPage Label: 19Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:40:05 PMColor:
SITE
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 1:48:44 PMColor:
asphalt
Highlight (12)
Please revise the line type of theparking stalls so that they arelighter (gray) to make the drawingmore clear.
Please label basin Bdrainage swale on themap.
Q (cfs) = 22.50Area (sqft) = 4.88Velocity (ft/s) = 4.61Wetted Perim (ft) = 14.84Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.62Top Width (ft) = 14.76EGL (ft) = 0.85
Depth (ft)Section
Provide protection forthis grass swale asthe velocity isexceeding thepermissible velocity
Project:
Basin ID:
Depth Increment = ft
Required Volume Calculation 6716.7 Top of Micropool -- 0.00 -- -- --
Selected BMP Type = EDB 6717 -- 0.30 -- -- --
Watershed Area = 7.91 acres 6718 -- 1.30 -- -- --
Watershed Length = 600 ft 6719 -- 2.30 -- -- --
Watershed Slope = 0.050 ft/ft 6720 -- 3.30 -- -- --
Watershed Imperviousness = 71.70% percent 6721 -- 4.30 -- -- -- 1
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A = 100.0% percent 6722 -- 5.30 -- -- -- 1
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B = 0.0% percent 6722.5 -- 5.80 -- -- -- 1
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D = 0.0% percent 6723.7 -- -- -- --
Desired WQCV Drain Time = 40.0 hours -- -- -- --
Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths = User Input -- -- -- --
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
OO
ArLength
(ft)
OptionalOverrideStage (ft)
Stage(ft)
Stage - StorageDescription
Area(ft 2̂)
Width(ft)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE FACILITY
BASIN A
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
update accordinglyper comments oncomposite imperviouscalculation
Project:
Basin ID:
Depth Increment = ft
uired Volume Calculation 6711.74 Top of Micropool -- 0.00 -- -- -- 0 0.000
Selected BMP Type = EDB 6712 -- 0.26 -- -- -- 462 0.011
Watershed Area = 5.61 acres 6713 -- 1.26 -- -- -- 7,015 0.161
Watershed Length = 840 ft 6714 -- 2.26 -- -- -- 9,304 0.214
Watershed Slope = 0.050 ft/ft 6715 -- 3.26 -- -- -- 10,935 0.251
Watershed Imperviousness = 57.40% percent 6715.6 -- 3.96 -- -- -- 11,492 0.264
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A = 100.0% percent -- -- -- --
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B = 0.0% percent -- -- -- --
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D = 0.0% percent -- -- -- --
Desired WQCV Drain Time = 40.0 hours -- -- -- --
Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths = User Input -- -- -- --
Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) = 0.106 acre-feet -- -- -- --
DETENTION BASIN STAGE-STORAGE TABLE BUILDER
OptionalOverride
Area (ft 2̂)Length
(ft)
OptionalOverrideStage (ft)
Stage(ft)
Stage - StorageDescription
Area(ft 2̂)
Width(ft)
TAMLIN ROAD STORAGE FACILITY
BASIN B
UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017)
Area(acre)
Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond)
update accordingly percomments on compositeimpervious calculation
SITE
SITE
SITE
Runoff fromasphalt panThe cross se
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 1:48:48 PMColor:
gravel
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 2:26:15 PMColor:
Drainage DesignCriteria
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:52:59 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:53:12 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:53:20 PMColor:
Water Quality Pond
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:53:32 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:53:58 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:54:02 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:54:16 PMColor:
Water Quality
30 acres of gran a gravel pan-lined swale th
Basin B1 consists of approximately 4.30 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls, and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin is collected in a gravel pan located along the basin’s western border. Theasphalt pan will discharge into a grass-lined swale that conveys the runoff to Water Quality Pond B.The cross sectional analysis of the drainage swale is presented in Appendix D.
Basin B2 consists of approximately 1.31 acres of gravel drives, parking stalls and landscaped areas.Runoff from this basin sheet flows into Water Quality Pond B.
Basin B3 consists of approximately 0.90 acres of landscaped areas and undeveloped land. Runofffrom this basin will follow historic drainage patterns and sheet flow westerly to Tamlin Road. Runofffrom this basin will not be detained in Water Quality Pond B.
Any offsite flows entering the site will bypass the site and not be captured in the water quality anddetention ponds. However, little to no off-site runoff is anticipated to enter the site. Drainage DesignCriteria
of gravel drives, parkingards Water Quality Pond
of gravel drives, parking
d A.
g stalls and landscaped ared to Water Quality Pond
dix D.
ndix D.
g stalls and landscaped areas.ed to Water Quality Pond A.
ndix D.
g stalls, landscaped areas and
48 aces of gravel drives,basin will follow histord in Water Quality Pond
cantly increase the runof
stalls, and landscaped arbasin’s western border. ff to Water Quality Pondix D.
Basin A5 consists othis basin will folloWater Quality Pond
Basin B1 consists o
y 1.31 acres of gravel d into Water Quality Pond
ly 0.90 acres of landsca
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 6Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 4:54:25 PMColor:
Water Quality
Subject: HighlightPage Label: 9Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:18:46 PMColor:
Pond
Subject: PolygonPage Label: 18Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:37:30 PMColor:
Polygon (3)
Subject: PolygonPage Label: 17Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:38:51 PMColor:
Subject: PolygonPage Label: 19Author: CSDate: 7/10/2019 1:40:27 PMColor:
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 1Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/15/2019 3:28:12 PMColor:
Add PCD File No. PPR1945
Text Box (4)
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 49Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 10:20:43 PMColor:
Please provide UD-BMP worksheet for each of theponds.
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 26Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 5:50:36 PMColor:
Per the submitted landscape plan the majority ofthe landscape islands have rock as a surfacematerial yet it does not appear to have beenaccounted for. For example basin B2, has a largeof amount of these islands with rock yet itattributes 1.46 acres to lawn (0% impervious) andthere is very little lawn in this basin. Please reviewthe submitted landscape plan and adjust thecalculations for all the basins accordingly.
Subject: Text BoxPage Label: 51Author: dsdtorresDate: 10/17/2019 6:15:12 PMColor:
Please provide stormwater flow arrows.
ely 0.90 acres of landscc drainage patterns and s
ed in Water Quality Pond
te will bypass the site an
Drainageand Pond
20,246.01
tional Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette77"N
C&M Properties, LLC12748 Barossa Valley Road
Colorado Springs, CO 80921
June 13, 2019Project No. 25134.01
Add PCD File No. PPR1945
Please provideUD-BMP worksheetfor each of theponds.
100% 0.00 0.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.59 0.0%
100% 2.84 66.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 1.46 0.0%
100% 0.38 29.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.93 0.0%
100% 0.00 0.0% 90% 0.00 0.0% 0% 0.90 0.0%
POND
POND
2513400_Drainage_Calcs_v2.07.xlsm
Per the submitted landscape plan the majority of the landscapeislands have rock as a surface material yet it does not appearto have been accounted for. For example basin B2, has a largeof amount of these islands with rock yet it attributes 1.46 acresto lawn (0% impervious) and there is very little lawn in thisbasin. Please review the submitted landscape plan and adjustthe calculations for all the basins accordingly.
Please provide stormwaterflow arrows.