final gp2 process plantfor aromatic extraction

Upload: saffwan-khan

Post on 04-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    1/81

    PROCESS PLANTFOR

    AROMATIC SEPARATION

    United Arab Emirates UniversityCollege of EngineeringTraining and Graduation Project UnitGraduation Project 2

    ShahnazRomia

    FatimaAmeri

    ShaikhaNader

    KhawlaKaabi

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    2/81

    ConclusionSafety Environmental impact

    Cost AnalysisSite Selection

    HAZOP and Safety Studies

    Materials of ConstructionDetailed design

    Summery of achievement in GP1 GP2

    IntroductionAcknowledgments

    Outline

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    3/81

    Acknowledgments

    Supervisor, Dr. Marcelo Castier. Project coordinator, Dr. Samir Emam. Dr. Samir Abu-Eishah, Dr. Nayef Mohamed Ghasem, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Zuhair, Dr. Mamdouh Ghannam, Dr.

    Mohamed Nakou and Eng. Saad Al Omari.Training and Graduation Projects Unit.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    4/81

    What are Aromatics ?Hydrocarbons with distinctive perfumed smell

    Hydrogen

    Carbon

    Benzene

    Toluene

    Xylenes

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    5/81

    What is Aromatics Extract

    Petroleum refining industry is the largest user o

    Reformate

    Rich in Benzene, Toluene and Xylenes (BTX).

    Naphtha

    Rich in aromatic hydrocarbons. Recovered from reformate stream by catalytic

    treatment of lower boiling distillates.

    Aromatics

    Catalytic reforming of Naphtha. Extracted using suitable solvent.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    6/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    7/81

    Summery of achievement in GP1 Designing a process plant for aromatics separationusing naphtha reformate as feed and Sulfolane as

    solvent.

    Achievements in GP1 :

    Literature review Selecting the best technology Calculating mass and energy balances Ethics and contemporary issues Safety and HAZOP considerations Economic evaluation.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    8/81

    Summery of achievement in GP2

    Achievements in GP2:

    Selecting the best types of pumps Detailed design of major pieces like heat exchangerscolumns Site selection for the aromatics extraction plant Materials of construction of the equipments HAZOP study was applied to each piece of equipment

    Capital cost of the new aromatics extraction plant

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    9/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    10/81

    Detailed DesignDistillation

    Used to separate key components in a mixture based on thedifference in their boiling points.

    Distillation is energy intensive; it can consume more than 50% of a

    plants operating energy cost.

    The importance of column internals is to provide better mass andheat transfers between the liquid and vapor phases in the column.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    11/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignStr ipper and Recovery Columns Using H YSYS

    Number of trays 34

    Column Diameter (m) 7.77

    Column Height (m) 21Top composition

    n-heptane Toluene Sulfolane 0.99 0.011 0

    Bottom composition

    n-heptane Toluene Sulfolane 0.00162 0.17 0.83

    Number of trays 34

    Column Diameter (m) 3.9

    Column Height (m) 21Top composition

    n-heptane Toluene Sulfolane 9.3*10 -3 0.99 0

    Bottom composition

    n-heptane Toluene Sulfolane 0 3.5*10 -5 0.99

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    12/81

    ab =

    Using Antoine equation to calculate the vapor pressure:

    vb

    va

    b

    a

    P P

    K K

    T C B

    A P ln

    T C B A P log

    L av = ( (top) (bottom) )0.5 = 1.385

    Cont./Detailed DesignStr ipper column hand calculation

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    13/81

    Cont./Detailed Design

    2.28

    385.1Log

    0.17160.0016

    0.01070.9893

    Log= Nmin

    avLog

    X

    X

    X

    X Log

    = NminLW

    HW

    HD

    LD

    0562.0D

    Lmin Rmin

    18.044Lmin

    0.01411

    *XFXD

    XFXD

    =F

    Lminavg

    FB

    DB

    FA

    DA

    avg

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    14/81

    Cont./Detailed Design

    Assume R = 1.2 R minR = 0.0674

    11

    min

    D

    Dm D

    R R R

    f N

    N N

    0.011

    D

    Dm D

    R

    R R

    58.63 N

    0.511min

    N N N

    Using Gilliland correlation

    32.5m1.8+1.2+0.51*)159(

    *)1(

    H

    salloewance g Trayspacin N H act

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    15/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignRecovery column hand calcul ation

    L av = ( (top) (bottom) )0.5 = 316.79

    5 N

    2* N

    2.55= Nln

    X-1X

    X-1X

    ln

    N

    ltheoritica

    minltheoritica

    min

    B

    B

    D

    D

    min

    N

    avg

    371.1*15.0

    51.1*

    thact

    N N

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    16/81

    Cont./Detailed Designm21.21.8+1.2+0.51*)17.36(

    *)1(

    H

    salloewance g Trayspacin N H act

    0183.0179.3164372523

    1

    min

    min

    RR

    D F

    RR

    027.0022.05.12.1 min

    RR RR RR

    333)5(

    237.15.1236336*

    ..

    10*2057.8

    14.92*37.0

    mkg

    m g

    K K mole

    matmmole

    g atm

    RT PMwt

    v

    Gas velocity in the tower (u) = (1.2 -1.5)/ (1.237)0.5

    = 1.08 -1.35 m/s

    Vapor flow rate = 46182.4 kg/h

    Volumetric flow rare, V . = (46182.4 kg/h/3600 s/h)/ (1.237 kg/m 3) =10.371m 3/s

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    17/81

    Cont./Detailed Design

    Comparison between HYSYS results and hand calculation

    For stripper column For recovery column

    HYSYS results Handcalculation

    Nmin 34 59

    Height (m) 21 32.5

    Diameter(m) 7.7 7.7

    m

    V D 13.349.3

    1.35-1.08*3.153*44

    .

    HYSYS results Handcalculation

    Nmin 34 37

    Height (m) 21 21.2

    Diameter(m) 3.9 3.49

    3.13

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    18/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    19/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignVessels

    Vessel Diameter(m) Height(m)

    Raffinate wash column (V-101) 0.9368 2.811

    Stripper Receiver (V-102) 1.695 5.085

    Recovery Column Receiver (V-103) 1.447 4.341

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    20/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignExtraction Column (T-101)

    l d

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    21/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignLLE

    l d

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    22/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignLLE

    Mass balance of sulfolane (input streams)

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    23/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignPumps

    Type of pump Maximum head (m)

    Centrifugal pump 152

    Axial pump 12

    Rotary pump 15200

    Reciprocating pump 300000

    According to the value of the head, the pump type will be selected.

    The expected maximum head for each type of pump

    g P

    H h g P

    To calculate the head of the pump, the following equation is used:

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    24/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignPumps

    For example, pump P101 A/BP1=1 bar to P 2= 8.83 bar.The density of the mixture is 848.5 kg/m 3

    value of the head does not exceed 125m

    068.94

    81.95.848

    10)183.8(

    23

    5

    m

    smmkg

    Pa H

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    25/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignPumps

    To find the power of the pump this equation was used:

    Where: F is the head in feetG is the flow rate in gallon per minutes (gpm)

    /(bar)Pr )min(67.13

    Effeciencydropessurem FlowkW

    104106.39-105.391038.21078.32855.080

    221024

    24274

    G F G F F FG FG F Ef feciency

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    26/81

    Cont./Detailed DesignPumps

    The molecular weight of benzene is 78.11 kg/mol and for octane is 114.23 kg/

    1min60)(

    )hr kg(

    3 hr mkg

    mv

    27.3138977.8189.383 hr

    kg kmol

    kg hr

    kmol Mwnm avg

    kmol kg Mwavg /77.81114.23)0.101()11.780.899(

    min617.0

    1min605.848

    27.31389 3

    3

    m

    hr mkg

    hr kg

    v

    69.155137.0/1)(bar)-(8.83)min(.617067.13

    kW m

    Power

    min1032.6

    17.264

    1min167.0

    433 gallon

    gallon

    mm

    feet308.62m1

    feet3.28084068.94 m

    %37.51 Effeciency

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    27/81

    Pumps

    P in (bar)

    P out (bar)

    Head (m) Volumetric Flow rate(m 3 /min) Efficiency %

    Power (kW)

    P101 A/B 1 8.83 94.07 0.6166 51.37 15.69

    P102 A/B 1 6.1 41.43 0.00091 51.17 0.01514

    P103 A/B 0.59 6.1 48.05 1.5736 61.79 23.43

    P104 A/B 0.48 8.83 72.07 0.2147 45.56 6.57

    P105 A/B 0.37 5.08 48.12 0.0470 48.90 0.7554

    P106 A/B 1.41 8.83 110.65 0.9060 58.14 19.301

    P107 A/B 0.48 2.05 16.98 4.8593 70.45 18.08

    P108 A/B 0.65 6.1 47.44 0.01653 48.81 0.3081

    Cont./Detailed Design

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    28/81

    For our plant, shell and tube heat exchanger was chosen to transfer heat betweenfluids.

    The reasons are: It provides large ratio of heat transfer area to volume and weight.

    Its shape allows easy construction in a wide range of sizes that can withstandshop fabrication stresses, shipping and field erection stresses and normaloperation conditions.

    It can be easily cleaned and if failure occurs, elements such as tubes andgaskets can be easily replaced.

    Cont./Detailed DesignH eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    29/81

    )()( ,,,.

    ,,,

    .

    out water inwater water P water out hinhh P oil T T C mT T C mq

    C T bulk 4.68

    28.3799

    C kg J C C T At h P

    obulk .

    23934.68 ,

    W skg

    T T C mq hhh ph 905.183267)8.3799)(2393)(25.1()( 21,.

    )( 21,.

    ccc P c T T C mq

    C C kg

    J s

    kg mW ooc )3045)(.4224)((905.183267

    sec89.2 kg m c

    Cont./Detailed DesignH eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    30/81

    Tc2=30 oC

    Th2=37.8 oC

    Tc1=45 oC

    1

    2

    12

    lnT T

    T T T lm

    Th1=99oC

    T1= 54 oC

    T2= 7.8 oC

    C T C T o

    o

    8.7308.37544599

    2

    1

    C T olm 88.23

    2

    2

    2

    17.0562

    .450

    28.7675

    .450min

    28.767588.23

    905.183267

    m

    C m

    W C

    W

    U UA

    A

    C mW U g assu

    C W

    C W

    T q

    UA

    T UAq

    o

    o

    o

    oo

    lm

    lm

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    31/81

    m L

    Andp

    m L g assu

    1.08585*

    17.0562

    5min

    From table A-11 (Holman, 2002) at nominal pipe size =1/8 in

    tubesdp

    ndpn

    minOD

    min ID

    intube

    tube

    tube

    159158.91910*833.6

    1.0858,

    010287.0405.0

    10*833.6269.0

    3

    3

    out shell dpn D *

    inmdpn out 5.10690.1297010287.0*159*

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    32/81

    mdpnm D

    min D

    out shell

    shell

    1297.0*0.14633

    0.146335.761

    C T ob 4.68atmixturetheof Properties

    :

    sm

    C mW k

    mkg

    o

    27

    w

    3

    1099.4m.s

    kg0002528.0m.s

    kg0003339.0.

    1155.0918.6Pr

    1.669

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    33/81

    lowturbulentf

    sm

    m sm

    dpu

    sm

    mm

    kg s

    kg A

    mu

    Aum

    mm

    IDn A

    in

    crosstubes

    crosstubes

    tubecrosstubes

    4392.661099.4

    10*833.6*320806.0

    *Re

    0.3208060058299.0*1.669

    25.1

    *

    **

    0.0058299)10*832.6(*159*4

    **4

    27

    3

    23

    ,

    .,

    .

    223

    2,

    14.0

    3/18.0 Pr Re027.0

    wd Nu

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    34/81

    14.0

    3/18.0

    sec.0002528.0

    sec.0003339.0)918.6()4392.66(027.0

    mkg

    mkg

    Nud

    43.898 Nu

    C mW

    mC m

    W

    IDk Nu

    h oo

    tubein .

    742.06810*833.6

    .1155.0*43.898*

    23

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    35/81

    559.4Pr sec109097.6

    .6304.0

    .1003.8.10862.6

    096.993

    27

    4

    4

    3

    mvC m

    W k sm

    kg sm

    kg m

    kg

    o

    w

    Shell calculation:

    C T b05.37

    24530

    C T b 5.37atwaterof PropertiesThe

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    36/81

    outshell

    23

    .

    .

    22222

    22

    dpn+d44

    0.808550.0036023*096.993

    89.2

    *

    **

    0.0036023010287.0*159*40.14633*4

    **4

    *4

    shell shell

    shell

    shell

    tube shell shell

    A P

    A HD

    smm

    mkg

    skg

    Am

    u

    Aum

    mmm

    ODn D A

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    37/81

    mmm

    m HD 0.0025739

    010287.0*159*0.14633*0.0036023*4 2

    lowturbulentf

    sm

    m sm HDu

    HD 3011.8410*9097.9

    0.0025739*0.80855*Re 27

    14.0

    3/18.0 Pr Re027.0

    wd Nu

    14.0

    4

    4

    3/18.0

    sec.1003.8

    sec.10862.6)559.4()3011.84(*027.0

    mkg

    mkg

    Nu d

    26.576d Nu

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    38/81

    C mW

    mC m

    W

    HDk Nu

    h oo

    out .6509.168

    0.0025739.

    6304.0*26.576*2

    C mW

    C mW

    C mW m

    m

    hhdpdp

    U

    o

    oo

    out inin

    out

    .458.185

    .6509.168

    1

    .742.068*10*833.6

    010287.01

    1*

    1

    2

    223

    2

    2

    16.751

    .458.185

    28.7675m

    C mW

    C W

    U UA A

    o

    o

    Ldpn A intube

    mm

    mdpn A

    Lin

    908.410833.6**159

    16.7513

    2

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    39/81

    The properties of this shell-and-tube heat exchanger (E-101)are:

    skg m

    C T C T

    C T

    C T s

    kg m

    water

    oout water

    oinwater

    oh

    oh

    h

    89.2

    45308.37

    99

    25.1

    .,

    ,

    2

    1

    .

    minOD

    min IDtube

    tube

    010287.0405.0

    10*833.6269.0 3

    min D shell 0.146335.761

    C mW U

    m Atubesn

    o.185.458

    751.16159

    2

    2

    m Length 908.4

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    40/81

    The properties of heat exchangers E-102 are asfollows :

    C T C T

    C T C T

    skg m

    oout water

    oinwater

    oh

    o

    h

    h

    4530

    46120

    78.12

    ,

    ,

    2

    1

    .

    minODmin ID

    tube

    tube

    010287.0405.010*833.6269.0 3

    min D shell 0.07366900.2

    C mW U

    m Atubesn

    o.298.21769

    8657.227

    2

    2

    m Length 944.4

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    41/81

    The properties of heat exchangers E-103 are as follows:

    skg m

    C T C T

    C T C T

    skg m

    water

    oout water

    oinwater

    oh

    oh

    h

    4185.6

    45308.37

    63

    27.8

    .,

    ,

    2

    1

    .

    minODmin ID

    tube

    tube

    010287.0405.010*833.6269.0 3

    min D shell 0.247659.75

    C mW U

    m Atubesn

    o.1108.23

    085.30281

    2

    2

    m Length 987.4

    H eat exchangers

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    42/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    43/81

    Materials of construction (MOC)The selection of materials of construction for equipment and facilities to producechemicals is a core subject of chemical engineering.The desired products can not be manufactured without considering the selectionof optimum materials of construction used in the equipments of the process plantfor:

    Safe. Economical manufacture. Required product quality.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    44/81

    The selection of materials of construction is guided by several important pointssuch as:

    The corrosion of the materials by the chemicals used in the process. The temperature.

    All the equipments are operated below 400oC, carbon steel is selected becauseit is cheap and strong.

    Extraction

    column

    Stripping

    column

    Raffinate

    waterwash

    column

    Solvent

    recoverycolumn

    Water

    Stripper

    Solvent

    regenerator

    Stripper

    receiver

    Recovery

    columnreceiver

    Temperature(oC)

    Top 99 118 37.8 63 110 177 46 63Bottom 85 168 37.8 169 121 - 46 63

    Pressure(atm)

    Top 6.10 1.88 5.08 0.37 1.41 0.68 1.41 0.37Bottom 8.83 2.22 5.08 0.59 1.48 - 1.41 0.37

    Cont./ Materials of construction (MOC

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    45/81

    Solvent regenerator reboiler which is constructed from stainless steel.

    The reason behind this is that sulfolane is a very stable extraction solvent, butover time, and at high temperature in the presence of oxygen, it can formacidic compounds.

    Cont./ Materials of construction (MOC

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    46/81

    The following four items are the main causes for corrosion/erosion problems in the aromatics extraction unit using sulfolane:

    Oxygen in the plant. Chlorine in circulating solvent. Accumulation of degradation and corrosion products in the plant. High temperature in reboilers.

    Cont./ Materials of construction (MOC

    Cont /Detailed Design

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    47/81

    cinhout

    cout hin

    cinhout cout hin

    T T T T

    T T T T T

    lnln

    Total module cost for different areas

    ln

    ln

    T U Q A

    T UAQ

    Cont./Detailed DesignOptimization of process vari ables

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    48/81

    Exchangers Type ofExchanger

    TubePressure

    (barg)

    MOC Area(squaremeters)

    PurchasedEquipment

    Cost

    BareModule

    Cost

    E-101 Multiple Pipe 6.18 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 15.8 $ 5,630 $ 18,500

    Multiple Pipe 6.18 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 16.8 $ 5,940 $ 19,500

    Multiple Pipe 6.18 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 17.8 $ 6,300 $ 20,700

    Multiple Pipe 6.18 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 20.6 $ 7,210 $ 23,700

    E-102 Multiple Pipe 1.15 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 26.1 $ 9,000 $ 29,600

    Multiple Pipe 1.15 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 30.1 $ 10,300 $ 33,900

    Multiple Pipe 1.15 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 36.1 $ 12,300 $ 40,400

    Multiple Pipe 1.15 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 46.5 $ 15,700 $ 51,700

    Multiple Pipe 1.15 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 73.1 $ 24,800 $ 81,500

    E-103 Multiple Pipe 0.37 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 2.87 $ 3,730 $ 12,300

    Multiple Pipe 0.37 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 2.99 $ 3,730 $ 12,300

    Multiple Pipe 0.37 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 3.13 $ 3,730 $ 12,300

    Multiple Pipe 0.37 Carbon Steel / Carbon Steel 3.29 $ 3,730 $ 12,300

    Total module cost for different areas

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    49/81

    Total module cost for different types of pumpsPumps

    (with drives) Pump Type Power

    (kilowatts) # Spares MOC Discharge

    Pressure (barg) Purchased

    Equipment Cost Bare Module Cost

    P-101 Centrifugal 15.7 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 6,280 $ 25,000

    P-102 Centrifugal 0.015 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 3,270 $ 13,000

    P-103 Centrifugal 23.4 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 7,510 $ 9,900

    P-104 Centrifugal 6.47 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 4,560 $ 18,100

    P-105 Centrifugal 0.755 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 3,270 $ 13,000

    P-106 Centrifugal 19.3 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 13,700 $ 54,700

    P-107 Centrifugal 18.1 1 Carbon Steel 2.05 $ 6,670 $ 26,600

    P-108 Centrifugal 0.308 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 6,530 $ 26,000

    P-101 Positive Displacement 15.7 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 14,000 $ 53,000

    P-102 Positive Displacement 0.015 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 6,000 $ 22,800

    P-103 Positive Displacement 23.4 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 17,100 $ 64,800

    P-104 Positive Displacement 6.47 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 9,600 $ 36,400

    P-105 Positive Displacement 0.755 1 Carbon Steel 5.08 $ 6,000 $ 22,800

    P-106 Positive Displacement 19.3 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 15,500 $ 58,700

    P-107 Positive Displacement 18.1 1 Carbon Steel 2.05 $ 15,000 $ 56,800

    P-108 Positive Displacement 0.308 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 6,000 $ 22,800

    P-101 Reciprocating 15.7 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 52,800 $204,000

    P-102 Reciprocating 0.015 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 9,470 $ 36,600

    P-103 Reciprocating 23.4 1 Carbon Steel 6.1 $ 68,000 $263,000

    P-104 Reciprocating 6.47 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 32,200 $124,000

    P-105 Reciprocating 0.755 1 Carbon Steel 5.08 $ 13,600 $ 52,500

    P-106 Reciprocating 19.3 1 Carbon Steel 8.83 $ 60,100 $232,000

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    50/81

    GuideWord

    Deviation Possible Causes Consequences Actions Required

    None No Flow - No feed materialbeing available.

    - Outlet stream reduced- The temperature increases

    causing damage.

    - Install low level alarm.- Ensure good communication

    with storage operator.

    - Line Blockage,

    Isolation valveclosed in error,LCV fails shut

    - Outlet stream reduced- The temperature increases

    causing damage.

    - Check design of pump

    strainers- Pipes maintenance- Installation for flow control.

    - Line fracture - Outlet stream reduced- The temperature increases

    causing damage.

    - Covered by a)- Institute regular patrolling and

    inspection of transfer line

    HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP of Pumps P-101A/B, P-102A/B, P-103A/B, P-104A/B, P-105A/B,P-106A/B, P-107A/B and P-108A/B

    Cont /HAZOP Study

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    51/81

    Moreof

    Flow - LCV fails or LCVbypass open inerror

    - More Materialflow

    - Low Outlet stream- It may overload

    motor.

    - Install high flow alarm(HFA) and check sizing ofrelief opposite liquid overfiling.

    - Repair FCV

    Pressure - Isolation valveclosed in error orLCV closed.

    - Plug in pipe

    Failure of MOC - Check lines and reducestroking speed of LCV idnecessary.

    Temperature - TCV Failure

    - Loss of coolingwater due topump failure

    - Higherconsumption forcooling water inother unit whichdecrease thecooling water.

    - High Temperaturein transfer line.

    - Affects tensilestrength of MOC

    - Plant shut down

    - Install a high Temperaturealarm

    - Repair TCV

    - Do a circulation for the feedto avoid plant shutdownand do the maintenancemean while.

    Lessof

    Flow - FCV Failure

    - Low material flow

    - Leaking

    - Material Loss- Low outlet stream

    - Repair FCV

    Cont./HAZOP Study

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    52/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Pressure - Inlet valve or suction line may be

    clogged - Optimum condition not reached- MOC failure if vacuum reached- Causes cavitations which will damage

    the component of the pump.- Great deal of noise.- Vibration and less of efficiency.

    - Low pressure alarm(LPA)

    - Maintain inlet valves

    Temperature - TCV Failure - Plant shut down - Low Temperature Alarm (LTA)

    - Decrease theprocessing flow rateto optimum rate

    - Repair TCV Maintenance - Equipment Failure - Line cannot be completely drained or

    purged - Install alarms.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    53/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP for Extractor column T-101

    Guide Word Deviation Possible Causes Consequences Actions

    RequiredNone No Flow - No naphthafeed available

    - The column may be washed by solvent, leaving fromthe bottom. (Quality and amount of product willsuffer)

    - Install lowlevel alarm.

    - No solvent flow - No separation of the naphtha feed - Install lowlevel alarm

    - Line fracture - Accidental discharge to the environment (aromaticsare flammable material).

    - Plant shutdown.

    More of Flow - LCV fails openin error

    - Erosion.- Overload the equipment.- Overfills- Material carry-over or inefficient separation.

    - Furtherevaluation ofadditional cut-off valve andshutdown

    system.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    54/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Pressure - Isolation valve close in

    error - Failure of a vessel or the

    associated piping leading tosequence events that result in a

    disaster.- Other streams may be diverted

    leading to spillage.

    - Pressure relief device.- High pressure alarm (HPA)- Back up pump

    - Maintain pipe

    More flow ofsolvent

    - Control valves fail open ortoo far open or misdirectedwhen on manual (FCVFailure).

    - Action reversed orcontroller.

    - More material flow

    Decrease selectivity of the

    separation.

    - Install high level alarm andcheck sizing.

    Temperature - Higher pressure in transfer

    line- High miscibility.- TCV Failure

    - Uncontrolled mixing of water withhydrocarbons which generatehigh pressure conditions causingdamage.

    - The components present in themixture will flash to steam and

    then can rupture pipes andvessels.

    - Equip the system with pressurerelief device.

    - High Temperature Alarm(HTA).

    - Repair TCV.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    55/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study

    Less of Flow of solvent - Incorrect rate of process flows.

    - FCV Failure.- Low material flow.

    - Aromatic compoundsmay well be lost to theraffinate providing apure product butachieving a less thancomplete recovery.

    - Isolate thatpart of theplant

    - Repair FCV

    Others Maintenance - Equipment Failure - Line cannot becompletely drained orpurged

    - Install alarms.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    56/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP for Water wash column V-101

    Guide Word Deviation Possible Causes Consequences ActionsRequired

    None Flow - No non-aromaticcompounds

    - Water coming from stream 13

    only pass through the

    equipment

    - low separation of non-aromatic

    - Install lowlevel alarm

    - Line fracture Accidental discharge to theenvironment.

    - Plant shutdown.

    More of More flow ofwater comingfrom recoverycolumn receiver

    - LCV fails open in error - Overfills

    - Water washes more material of

    the non-aromatics

    - Install highlevel alarmand checksizing.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    57/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP for Stripper column T-102

    Guide Word Deviation Possible Causes Consequences ActionsRequired

    None No Flow - No flow in stream9 coming to thecolumn

    - Quality and amount of product will suffer. - Install low levelalarm

    - Line fracture - Accidental discharge to the environment(aromatics are flammable material).

    - Plant shutdown.

    More of Flow - LCV fails open inerror

    - Overfills- Incomplete separation of non-aromatics from

    solvent + aromatics

    - Install highlevel alarm andcheck sizing.

    Pressure - Isolation valveclose in error

    - Full pump delivery - Isolation valveclose in error

    Temperature - Higher pressure intransfer line

    - Degradation of the solvent quality will becomesignificant ms.

    - HighTemperature

    Alarm (HTA).

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    58/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    59/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP for Recovery column T-103

    GuideWord

    Deviation

    Possible Causes Consequences Actions Required

    None No Flow - No flow in stream 11 - No aromatic separation - Install low level alarm - Line fracture - Accidental discharge to the

    environment - Plant shut down.

    More of More flow ofsolvent richaromatics

    - LCV fails open in error - Erosion.- Overload the equipment.- Leaks from other process.- .

    - Install high level alarmand check sizing.

    Pressure - Isolation valve close in

    error

    - Failure of a vessel or the associated

    piping

    - High pressure alarm

    (HPA)- Back up pump

    Temperature - Higher pressure intransfer line

    - Degradation of the solvent whichleads to fouling and corrosionproblems.

    - High Temperature Alarm(HTA).

    - Repair TCV. Less of Flow - Leaking flange of valve

    - Incorrect rate of processflows.

    -FCV Failure.- Low material flow.

    - Material discharge to theenvironment

    - Isolate that part of theplant

    - Repair FCV

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    60/81

    Cont./HAZOP Study Results of HAZOP of Solvent regenerator V-104

    Deviation Causes Consequences Action

    More of Temperature - TCV Failure

    - Solvent degradationcausing corrosion to theequipment.

    - Equip the system with pressure reliefdevice.

    - High Temperature Alarm (HTA).- Repair TCV.

    Pressure - Blockage in some ofthe outlet streams.

    - High flow in the inletstreams.

    - Failure of a vessel or theassociated piping leading tosequence events that resultin a disaster.

    - Pressure relief device.- High pressure alarm (HPA)- Back up pump- Maintain pipe

    Flow - Control valves failopen or too far openor misdirected whenon manual (FCVFailure).

    - Action reversed orcontroller.

    - More material flow

    - Erosion.- Overload the equipment.- Leaks from other process

    streams or the environment.- Material carry-over or

    inefficient separation.

    - Further evaluation of additional cut-offvalve and shutdown system.

    - Restriction orifice in line.

    - High flow alarm (HFA)- Repair FCV

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    61/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    62/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    63/81

    Why J FZ Jafza is built over an area of 48

    square kilometers, a fewkilometers from the city ofDubai. It ranks among theworlds largest and the fastestgrowing free zones.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    64/81

    Free Zone Analysis Demographic Analysis: All labor available with different educational

    levels. Trade Area Analysis: Feasibility of accessing the trade area. Competitive Analysis: The nature, location, size and quality. Traffic analysis: Logistics for transporting raw materials and products. Site economics: Establishment and operational costs are fair as there is no

    taxes.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    65/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    66/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    67/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    68/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    69/81

    Manufacturing Cost

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    70/81

    FixedCapital

    Investment

    WasteTreatment

    RawMaterial

    s

    OperatingLabor

    Utilities

    Maintenance

    Manufacturing Cost

    CAPCOST

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    71/81

    CAPCOSTThe CAPCOST program is used to determine the capital cost of differeitems of equipment in the process plant, which are heat exchangers, puvessels, extraction and distillation columns.

    Pumps Power (KW) Discharge Pressure(barg) PurchasedEquipment Cost

    Bare ModuleCost

    P-101 15.7 8.83 $ 6,280 $ 25,000 P-102 0.015 6.1 $ 3,270 $ 13,000 P-103 23.4 6.1 $ 7,510 $ 9,900 P-104 6.47 8.83 $ 4,560 $ 18,100 P-105 0.755 6.1 $ 3,270 $ 13,000 P-106 19.3 8.83 $ 13,700 $ 54,700 P-107 18.1 2.05 $ 6,670 $ 26,600 P-108 0.308 6.1 $ 6,530 $ 26,000

    Heat Exchangers Area (squaremeters) Purchased EquipmentCost Bare Module Cost

    E-101 30.1 $ 13,700 $ 45,200 E-102 2.86 $ 4,970 $ 16,400 E-103 16.8 $ 7,920 $ 26,000

    All pumps are centrifugal

    All heat exchangers are multiple pipes and are centrifugal.

    Cont./CAPCOST

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    72/81

    Cont./CAPCOST

    All purchased towers are empty vertical vessel

    Distillationcolumn

    Height(meters)

    Diameter(meters)

    Pressure(barg)

    PurchasedEquipment Cost

    Bare ModuleCost

    T-101 45 9 1 $ 2,350,000 $ 10,400,000

    T-102 39 7.7 2.22 $ 1,490,000 $ 7,870,000T-103 21 3 0.59 $ 127,000 $ 515,000

    Vessels Orientation Length/Height(meters)Diameter(meters)

    Pressure(barg)

    PurchasedEquipmentCost

    Bare ModuleCost

    V-101 Vertical 2.81 0.937 5.08 $ 5,750 $ 23,800

    V-102 Horizontal 5.09 1.7 1.41 $ 15,200 $ 45,900V-103 Horizontal 4.34 1.44 0.37 $ 11,700 $ 35,200

    Total purchased cost = $ 4,078,030

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    73/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    74/81

    Materials cost

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    75/81

    ate a s costSul folane cost

    Sulfolane cost is equal to $4000/tones, where the total amount required inthe process is 6.228 tones/year.

    Total cost of material = $4000/tones * 6.228 tones/year = 24,914.57$/yearMass of Sulfolane (Kg/hr) 0.068 Density of Sulfolane(Kg/m 3) 1261 (hr) 0.25

    mass/density 0.000053 V(m3) 0.000013 annual purchase ($/yr) 0.00243

    Cost of labor

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    76/81

    year 245shifts/ek.labor 5shifts/wear 49weeks/yer.labor shift /yeaof number

    k.labor 5shift/week.labor shift /weeof number49weeks/labor work week of numbertotal

    ar 52weeks/yeweek/year of numbertotal

    4.47r yrear.labo245shifts/

    /year 1095shiftsany timeat plantin theneededoperatorof number

    /year 1095shiftsy3shifts/dar 365day/yeashift/year of numbertotal

    3shift/day8hr/shift24hr/day

    r sheft /yeaof number

    year $

    700,000year

    $50,00014labor of cost

    year $

    50,000hour

    $25

    shiftshours

    8year

    shifts245hour working

    14labor 13.284.472.97 Nol

    2.97110.2331.7(0)6.29 Nol

    equipmentof number N

    handlingsolidof number P

    labor of number Nol

    N0.2331.7P6.29 Nol

    2

    np

    2

    np2

    Profit Calculations

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    77/81

    Total capital cost $ 4877512.59 COM $ 3,330,399 depreciation= 0.1 TCC 0.1 Tax rate 0.2 BTX selling price $/Ib 3.95 BTX density 0.8765

    Total amount of BTX produced is 835,438.9425 tones/year

    year $700.365,817,991,ondepreciatiafter taxProfitCash

    $25.751,487CostCapitalTotal0.1onDepreciatiyear

    $949.105,817,503,taxtax beforeProfitafter taxProfityear

    $27.987,375,454,12.0936,879,271,7ratetaxincome Nettax

    year $936,879,271,7income Nettax beforeProfit

    year $ 936,879,271,7COM-salefromIncomeincome Net

    year $ 7275210336)62.2204*95.3(94.835438

    ($/tones) priceSelling(tones/yr)rateProductionsalefromIncome

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    78/81

    Safety Environmental impactHydrocarbon toxicity stands for toxic intake of either

    petroleum or nonpetroleum-distillate hydrocarbons.

    It has a considerable absorption through the humandigestive system causing:

    Local toxicity (breathing problems, choking,

    vomiting, cough, long term fever).Systemic toxicity (depression, euphoria, headache,dizziness and heart failure in severe cases).

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    79/81

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    80/81

    ConclusionThe objective was to design of a process plant that handles approximately37.89 m3/hr of an aromatic-rich blend of pyrolysis naphtha and coke ovenlight oil to separate aromatics such as benzene, toluene and xylenes by usingan aromatic-selective solvent (sulfolane).

    Following missions were done: Material and energy balance, Design ofevery piece of equipment, Hazop study, safety and ethical considerations,cost analysis and the site selection.

  • 8/13/2019 Final GP2 Process Plantfor Aromatic Extraction

    81/81