final presentation gimena gordillo xavier hailey · ventosa, n. et al. “depressurization of an...
TRANSCRIPT
Nanopowder ProductionA Comparison of Several Methods
Gimena GordilloXavier Hailey
Advisors: Prof. G. A. MansooriGrad. Student Listowel Agyarko
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Outline
Introduction to Nanotechnology1. What is Nanotechnology 2. Nanostructures3. The Importance of Nanotechnology4. Applications of Nanotechnology
Research1. Objectives2. Crystallization3. Nanopowder Production Techniques
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
What is Nanotechnology?
Research and Development in the length scale of 1 - 100 nanometer range.
Build micro and macro materials and products with atomic precision.
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Nanostructures
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Importance of Nanotechnology
Nanoscale variations’ effects on atomic structure.
Conduction properties
Higher density than microstructures.
High surface to volume ratio.
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Applications of Nanotechnology
“Robots” in Living Systems
Electronics
Catalysts
Information Storage Capacity
Pharmaceuticals
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Applications of Nanotechnology
Comparison between micro and nano Molybdenum
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Nanopowders
ApplicationsPharmaceuticalsPigmentsPolymers
Particle FormationChemical RoutesPhysical Methods
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Nanopowder Production
Disadvantages of Conventional Methods of Powder Production
Particle Size CharacteristicsEnergy CostsMaterial Liabilities
Supercritical Fluids as an AlternativeBetter Particle Size CharacteristicsLower Energy Costs“Milder” Process
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Crystallization
β= concentration /super-saturation concentration
Nucleation vs. Crystal Growth
Effects on the size distribution of particles Fig.1. Time vs. Supersaturation Ratio [7]
RESEARCH
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Objectives
Study and compare nanopowder production techniques
Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS)Supercritical Anti-solvent (SAS)Particle from Gas Saturated Solutions (PGSS)Depressurization of an Expanded Liquid Organic Solution (DELOS)
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS)
ApplicationsPharmaceuticalsEncapsulation
Driving ForcePressure gradient in the nozzle
Description of Process1. Dissolution of Solute2. Rapid Depressurization
2
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
RESS Process
2
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS)
Working Condition Change EffectsTemperature and Pressure
AdvantagesOrganic Solvent not required No Environment Hazard
DisadvantagesSeveral families are not soluble in CO2
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Supercritical Anti Solvent (SAS)
ApplicationsPharmaceuticalsPolymers & BiopolymersCatalysts
Driving ForceSupersaturation Ratio, β>1
Description of Process1. Dissolution 2. Mixing & Crystallization3. Stripping
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
SAS Process
LiquidCO2cylinder
Heat Exchanger
Mixing device
Collectingbasket
Solution vessel
Pump
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Supercritical Antisolvent(SAS)
Working Condition Change EffectsSmall Effects from Pressure and TemperatureMixing and Droplet Formation in Nozzle
Advantages Formation of ParticlesSolubilityLarge range of materialsEasy Removal of Antisolvent
DisadvantagesRemoval of Solvent
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Particles from Gas Saturated Solutions (PGSS)
ApplicationsPharmaceuticals, Including Lipids
Driving ForceLarge Drop from Working Pressure to Atmospheric Pressure
Description of Process 1. Melting of Solvent Under Pressure2. Expansion of Solution Through Nozzle
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
PGSS ProcessMixing Vessel
ExpansionVessel
Recycle
CO2
Solvent Reservoir
CO2
Pump Nozzle
Recycle
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Particles from Gas Saturated Solutions (PGSS)
Working Condition Change EffectsPressure Effects on Morphology and Aggregation
AdvantagesBroad Range of MaterialsSolvent-free ProcessAllows for Encapsulation & Micro Composites
DisadvantagesSCF Dissolution
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
PGSS
SEM images of Theophylline/HPO composite particles formed by PGSS process at 359 K and a. 18 MPa b. 14 MPa to atmospheric conditions [6].
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Depressurization of an Expanded Liquid Organic Solution (DELOS)
ApplicationsDyes and Chemical IntermediatesSpecialty Polymers & Explosives
Driving ForceLarge Temperature Gradient
Description of Process 1. Dissolution2. Pressurization3. Expansion
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
DELOS Process
CO2
NO2
ExpansionVessel
SeparationVessel
Mixing Vessel
Pump
Solvent Reservoir
Recycle
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Working Condition Change EffectsWorking Pressure & Flow RateParticle Characteristics & solubility ratio.
AdvantagesMild ProcessAllows for Encapsulation
DisadvantagesSolubility Limit to Process
Depressurization of an Expanded Liquid Organic Solution (DELOS)
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
DELOS
SEM images of particles produced by DELOS process [
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Conclusions
YesYesYesYesEncapsulation
micro & nanomicro & nanomicro & nanomicro & nanoParticle Size
3 Steps2 Steps3 Steps2 StepsLength of Procedure
SCFHighestSCFSCFWorking Temperature Dependence
SCFMorphologySCFSCFWorking Pressure Dependence
TemperatureTemperatureSolubilityPressureDriving Force
Co-SolventSoluteAnti-Solvent SolventRole of SCF
Larger Mol.High PuritySmall Mol.Small Mol.Applications
DELOSPGSSSASRESS
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Conclusions
Selection of ProcessSupercritical Fluid Interaction With Desired Product
Desired Product Characteristics
Capital and Operational Costs
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Future Work
Development of Computational Models
Building of Experimental Setups
Production of Products
Analysis of Products
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
Acknowledgements
Prof. G. A. Mansoori
Graduate Student Listowel Agyarko
Prof. R. Turian
NSF for Financial Support
NSF-REU University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2004
References1. Mansoori, G. A. “Advances in Atomic & Molecular
Nanotechnology.”2. www.nano.gov3. http://www.nyu.edu/pages/mathmol/library/carbon/fullerene.gif4. www.climaxmolybdenum.com/ NanoMo.htm5. Fages, J. et al. “Particle Generation for Pharmaceutical
Applications Using Supercritical Fluid Technology.”6. Rodrigues, M. et al. “Microcomposites
theophylline/hydrogenated palm oil from a PGSS process for controlled drug delivery systems.”
7. Ventosa, N. et al. “DELOS Process: a crystallization technique using compressed fluids1. comparison to the GAS crystallization method.”
8. Ventosa, N. et al. “Depressurization of an Expanded Liquid Organic Solution (DELOS): A New Produce for Obtaining Submicron or Micron Sized Crystalline Particles.”
Questions?