final scm presentation

14
Barilla SpA Team: Anantharaman Akshay Bhardwaj Jaimin Parikh Rohit Shahane

Upload: bhardwajakshay

Post on 19-Jan-2015

5.920 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Scm Presentation

Barilla SpA

Team:

AnantharamanAkshay BhardwajJaimin ParikhRohit Shahane

Page 2: Final Scm Presentation

Barilla - At a glance• World’s largest Pasta manufacturer in 1990

• Market share of Pasta – 35% in Italy and 22% in Europe

• Wide range of products from pasta(200 varieties with 470 packaging combinations), breads, sauces and other bakery products.

• Barilla was organized into seven divisions: Three pasta divisions Fresh Bread Division Bakery Product Division Catering Division International Division

Page 3: Final Scm Presentation

Channels of Distribution• Product divided into two categories – “Dry” and “Fresh”• Sells to retailers via third party distribution

Barila runDepots

GDGrand

Distributors

Dry productfactory

DODistribution

Organization

Barila CDCs

Supermarketchains

Independentsupermarkets

SmallIndependent

shops

Page 4: Final Scm Presentation

Practices Effects observed• Random trade promotions

• Differentiated Sales Strategies

Demand variability

• Production based on orders

Burden on manufacturing & distribution system Bullwhip effect

• Decentralized information flow

Poor Communication

• Dedicated Manufacturing in each product variety

Higher cost of Responsiveness

Major Issues

Page 5: Final Scm Presentation

• The above mentioned practices at Barilla resulted in thinning margins for both the manufacturers and distributors.

• To improve the situation, the Director of Logistics at Barilla suggested implementation of Just-In-Time Distribution (JITD, modeled after the popular JIT philosophy).

Definition of JITD:“Service allowing distributors to operate with low stocks

while maintaining optimal service standards at retailers supplied by DC”.

Page 6: Final Scm Presentation

Implementing JITD would entail the following:

• Barilla would now have to buy point-of-sales data from all distributors for effective demand forecasting (in effect, production would now be based on the predicted demand and not the distributor orders ).

• Would have to convince the distributors about the credibility of JITD.

• Promotions now need to be planned well in advance for effective co-ordination with the manufacturing facility.

• In essence, rather than following the traditional practice, Barilla’s own Logistics Organization would specify the “appropriate” delivery quantities.

Page 7: Final Scm Presentation

Just-in-Time DistributionJust-in-Time DistributionBenefits for Manufacturer :

• Enjoys control over entire supply chain• Reduces inventory levels• Better Relationship with distributor• Improvement in manufacturing planning• Better prediction & planning for promotions

Benefits for Distributor:• Relief from Forecasting• Reduces inventory• Fewer backlogs/stock-outs at retailers• Fair competition amongst distributors

Page 8: Final Scm Presentation

Traditional Information Flow

Information Flow after JITD implementation

Here we represent pictorially the behavioral changes of information flow before and after the implementation of

JITD

Page 9: Final Scm Presentation

Resistance to JITD implementation

From Distributors (External) :

“Managing stock is my job; I don’t need you to see my warehouse or my figures.”

“We would be giving Barilla the power to push products into our warehouse just so that Barilla can reduce its costs.”

From Sales & Marketing Department (Internal) :

“How can we get the trade to push Barilla product to retailers if we don’t offer some sort of incentive?”

“If space is freed up in our distributors’ warehouses, the distributors would then push our competitors’ product more than ours.”

Page 10: Final Scm Presentation

Recommendations

• Run Pilot Tests at Barilla owned depots as evidence to convince third party distributors.

Page 11: Final Scm Presentation

Recommendations

• To provide scope for competition among distributors, Barilla should allow them to place orders within a specified range.

Page 12: Final Scm Presentation

Recommendations

• To offset the high investment in implementing JITD system to whatever extent possible, we recommend that CDC integrated with their Northern Manufacturing Plant can be eliminated.

Page 13: Final Scm Presentation

Location of CDC & DC in Italy

Page 14: Final Scm Presentation

Recommendations

• Since, “Per capita pasta consumption in Italy averaged nearly 18 kilos per year, greatly exceeding that of other western European countries”, Barilla cannot afford stock out.

• Therefore, at least one CDC is required.

• To successfully implement JITD system, responsiveness of the manufacturing facility has to be enhanced. We propose that this can be achieved by investing in R&D to facilitate postponement of the final step (include seasoning in packaging) in preparation of particular variety of pasta.