final sep presentation

Upload: jasmine-alfonso

Post on 07-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    1/32

    1

    Jasmine AlfonsoJasmine Alfonso

    The Tech CenterThe Tech Center

    New Visions EducationNew Visions Education

    COMPARATIVE STUDYCOMPARATIVE STUDY

    BETWEEN STUDENTBETWEEN STUDENT

    ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES AND NON-

    ATHLETES IN HIGHERATHLETES IN HIGHER

    LEVEL CLASSESLEVEL CLASSES

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    2/32

    2

    How do student athletesHow do student athletesperform in higher levelperform in higher level

    classes as compared to non-classes as compared to non-athlete students?athlete students?

    THESIS

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    3/32

    3

    Purpose of Study

    To determine if there is a correlation between athleticsand academics in secondary education

    The relationship between the success rate in higher level

    classes such as honors, advanced placement, andcollege level classes as compared to the amount ofphysical activity the student receives determined bywhether or not the student participates in a varsity orJ.V. level sport

    Examines whether or not there is true a relationship

    between the mind and body in correlation betweengrade point averages and physical activity

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    4/32

    4

    Background Research

    LITERATURE REVIEW

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    5/32

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    6/32

    6

    General Information Continued

    In a time where child obesity is on the rise, theimportance of being fit both mentally andphysically is an essential component to being ahealthy person

    Students, who in general, are physically fit perform

    better on academic achievement tests overstudents who are not as physically fit. showing

    that as fitness scores improved the scores foracademic achievement improved as well. (Vail,2006)

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    7/32

    7

    Positive Correlations

    Increased physical activity through physical education includeincreased arousal and reduced boredom, which may lead toincreased attention span and concentration [as well as] increasedself-esteem, which could be expected to improve classroom

    behavior as well as academic performance. (Coe, et. all, 2006,1515)

    For example, investigators in Illinois found that students totalfitness, as measured by passing all 5 components of theFitnessgram, positively correlated with academic achievement,

    measured by the standardized Illinois State Achievement Test,particularly Mathematics and Science. (Chomitz, et. all, 2009, 31)

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    8/32

    8

    Positive Correlations Continued

    Students who are physically fit exhibit betterconcentration than their peers; stating how theexercise these students are receiving lowered stresslevels and anxiety, which are factors that can have a

    large impact on the mental capabilities of a student(Vail, 2006).

    It was also stated by the Department of Education thatstudents who participate in sports are three times aslikely to have a GPA of 3.0 and higher (Stegman,Stephens, 2000).

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    9/32

    Trends

    Female athletes tend to have greater academic abilities over their malecounterparts. As well as a greater correlation in math scores overthose in English (Chomitz, et all., 2009).

    Sports foster the development of student success in lifelong learning,

    life roles and personal effectiveness. Allowing student-athletes todistinguish rules of behavior in team settings, as well as assisting inthe development of team, letting individuals reflect upon failure on andoff the field (Silliker, Quirk, 2002).

    These characteristics which are commonly found in student-athletes

    have shown to lead to higher career aspirations, better attendancerecords, reduced delinquency and a higher social standing amongtheir peers (Silliker, Quirk, 2002).

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    10/32

    10

    Trends Continued Sports not only assist in improving the success of student

    achievement in the classroom, but also show that talentedathletes have higher graduation and report rates over theirpeers who are not as athletic

    This can be attributed to the commitment they have fortheir sport as well as a problem focused, self-consciousand goal oriented mind of a student athlete (Jonker, etall, 2009).

    Student-athletes ability to manage their time better than thatof non-athletes is shown also in a study completed byLaughlin in 1978 where he found that overall student-athletes had a high grade point average

    During the on-season the students maintained a highergrade point average than during the off seasons oftheir sport. (Silliker, Quirk, 2002).

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    11/32

    11

    Negative Correlations

    Student-athletes, training through the educational system has left anumber of student-athletes with inadequate skills necessary foracademic success in college. (Dilley-Knoles, Burnett, Peak, 2010, 2)

    The Womans Sports Foundation determined that overall there is no effecton the grade point average of student athletes in rural, urban orsuburban areas.

    The study shows that while sports made little impact on grades the students were notas likely to attend a four year college.

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    12/32

    12

    Inconclusive Results

    Several studies have been completed over the past few

    decades which have yielded inconclusive results, due tothe amount a variable influence on the study.

    Some of the studies which were deemed inconclusive ornegative include Melnick as well as Marsh and Kraus inthe late 90s (as cited in Broh, 2002).

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    13/32

    13

    Design of study

    METHODOLOGY

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    14/32

    14

    Setting of Study A high school in suburban New York State. The schoolwas large in scale and maintained roughly 400 students

    per grade level

    Approximately 525 surveys were distributed to students.305 were returned completed.

    100 were student athletes who were enrolled in higherlevel classes

    30 were student-athletes not enrolled in higher levelclasses

    120 were non athlete students enrolled in higher levelclasses

    57 were non athlete students not enrolled in higher levelclasses

    The individuals who participated in this study were

    willing male and female high school students who arebetween the ages of 14 to 18

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    15/32

    15

    Overview of Study

    an anonymous survey was created asking if they: participated in sports

    how many hours a week they perform physical activity

    how many honors, AP, and college level classes they areenrolled in

    how many hours a week they spent studying andcompleting homework

    check off the averages they had for each higher level classand GPA

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    16/32

    16

    Overview of Study Continued

    a letter was sent to the local school administrators togain approval to test the hypothesis in the suburbanhigh school

    a letter was then sent out to fourteen teachers, coachesand club representatives asking if they would allowtheir students to participate in the study

    copies of the survey were then given to that teacher for

    distribution. Responses were collected from thosestudents who were willing to participate over a periodof two weeks.

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    17/32

    17

    Overview of Study Continued

    each survey was separated into four separatecategories:

    Student Athletes enrolled in higher level classes

    Student Athletes not enrolled in higher level classes

    Non-Athletes enrolled in higher level classes Non-Athletes not enrolled in higher level classes

    the data was then inputted into Microsoft Excel to besorted into a table.

    all the data was placed into the correct category

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    18/32

    18

    Overview of Study Continued charts were created that used data from three of the

    categories:

    student type

    enrolled in higher level

    GPA

    Four charts were made which displayed the percentage

    of students from each category who maintained acertain GPA range.

    the percentages from each were then taken andcompared in a final graph which compared the overallresults of the study

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    19/32

    19

    Observations of data

    RESULTS

    C d GPA

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    20/32

    20

    Compared GPAsbetween

    Athletes & Non-Athletes

    :N o te H LC sta n d sfo r H ig h e r Le ve l

    C la sse s

    A s d isp la ye d b y th eg ra p h A th le te sy ie ld e d b e tte r

    ,re su lts w h e th e r or

    n o t th e y w e re.e n ro lle d in H LC

    Athl t

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    21/32

    21

    Athletesnot enrolled inHigher Level

    Classes

    2 students had the GPA. . ( %)range of 2 1 2 5 7

    14 students had the GPA. . ( %)range of 2 6 3 0 47

    10 students had the GPA. . ( %)range of 3 1 3 5 33

    4 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range of 3 6 4 0 13

    :total 30 students fit

    this category

    N Athl t

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    22/32

    22

    Non-Athletesenrolled in

    Higher LevelClasses

    1 student had the GPA. . ( %)range 1 6 2 0 1

    3 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 2 1 2 5 2

    19 students had the GPA. . ( %)range 2 6 3 0 16

    47 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 3 1 3 5 39

    49 students had the GPA. . ( %)range 3 6 4 0 41

    1 student did not know

    ( %)their GPA range 1

    :Total 120 students fit inthis category

    Non Athletes not

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    23/32

    23

    Non-Athletes notenrolled in

    Higher LevelClasses

    2 students had the GPA. . ( %)range 1 6 2 0 4

    7 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 2 1 2 5 13

    14 students had the GPA. . ( %)range 2 6 3 0 25

    25 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 3 1 3 5 45

    4 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 3 6 4 0 6

    5 students had an

    ( %)unknown GPA range 7

    :Total 57 students fit in

    this category

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    24/32

    24

    Athletes enrolledin Higher Level

    Classes

    1 student had the GPA. . ( %)range 1 1 1 5 1

    1 student had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 1 6 2 0 1

    1 student had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 2 1 2 5 1

    12 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 2 6 3 0 12

    34 students had the GPA

    . - . ( %)range 3 1 3 5 34

    51 students had the GPA

    . . ( %)range 3 6 4 0 51

    :Total 101 students fit

    into this category

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    25/32

    25

    DISCUSSION

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    26/32

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    27/32

    27

    Significance

    shows that students need be focus not only on theirmind but on their body as well

    in order to not only keep them physically active but alsoimprove themselves academically

    correlation between the mind and body will stop schools

    from cutting sports and gym classes from curricula inorder to save money

    By promoting physical activity in school the students will

    increase their abilities in the classroom while providingexperiences outside of the classroom

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    28/32

    28

    Further Investigation

    Be tested on schools in the surrounding areas in order toshow a going trend in students across the board.

    Gain the exact GPA of each student in order to maintaina firmer grasp of the data

    More specific in the grouping of students by asking morequestions about the student

    the grade level gender of the student

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    29/32

    29

    Limitations

    The need to maintain the anonymity of the student.The types of questions which can be asked to categorize

    the students are limited

    Stops other people from being able to identify thestudents who par-took and were involved in thecompletion of the study

    Data collection

    Through the limited contact with the students involved it

    was difficult to gauge when student had questionswhen answering and completing the survey

    Led to certain parts of the survey to being null and voidwhen analyzing the data.

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    30/32

    30

    Errors in Study

    Teachers held on to surveys instead of handing them in

    Directions were not followed on the survey for question3(how many honors level classes the student is

    involved in) Listed all HLC instead of just honors classes

    took up more time to reanalyze and correct data

    Did not understand question (check off each time ahigher level class has a specific average)

    Only checked off one average

    Answers were skewed, unusable and the question wasdisregarded

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    31/32

    31

    References Begnaud, B. (2007) The effect of athletic involvement on GPA: The benefits

    of playing a sport - Associated Content from Yahoo! -associatedcontent.com. (n.d.). Associated Content from Yahoo! -associatedcontent.com. Retrieved November 3, 2010, fromhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/146382/the_effect_of_athletic_invo lvement.html?cat=25

    Broh, B. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic

    achievement: Who benefits and why?.American SociologicalAssociation, 75(1), 69-95.

    Chomitz, V., Slinning, M., McGowan, R., Mitchell, S., Dawson, G., & Hacker,

    K. (2009). Is there a relationship between physical fitness andacademic achievement? Positive results from public school children inthe northeastern United States. Journal of School Health, 79(1), 30-36.

    Coe, D. P., Pivarnik, J., Womack, C., & Reeves, M. (2006). Effect of physical

    education and activity levels on academic achievement in children. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(8), 1515-19.

    Dilley-Knoles, J., Burnett, J., & Peak, K. (2010). Making the grade: academic

    success in today's athlete. The Sport Journal, 13(1), 7. Retrieved

    December 20, 2010, fromhttp://www.thesportjournal.org/article/making-grade-academic-success-- -

  • 8/6/2019 Final SEP Presentation

    32/32

    32

    References continuedJonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M., & Visscher, C. (2009). Talented

    athletes and academic achievements: A comparison over 14

    years. High Ability Studies, 20(1), 10.Jr., Thomas R. M. (n.d.). ATHLETICS - ATHLETICS - Playing sports

    doesn't lift grades, study finds - NYTimes.com. The New YorkTimes - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. RetrievedMarch 21, 2011, from

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE0D81239F93 5A2575BC0A96F948260

    Silliker, A., & Quirk, J. (2002). The effect of extracurricular activity

    participation on the academic performance of male and femalehigh school students.American Shool Councelor Association,44(4), 1-7.

    Stegman, M., & Stephens, L. (2010, December). Athletics and

    academics: Are they compatible?. High School Magazine, 7, 1-3.

    Vail, k. (2006). Is physical fitness raising grades?.American School

    Board Journal 193(30 33) 7