finance.wharton.upenn.edu
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
The Future of Social Security
Andrew B. Abel
October 4, 2000
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
2
OASDI Operations Estimates for 2000
(billions of dollars, except Trust fund ratio)
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table III.B2.
Trust fund at beginning of year 896.1Income excluding interest 500.7Interest income 64.9Total income 565.7Outgo 410.3Net income 155.4Trust fund at end of year 1051.5Trust fund ratio 2.18
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
3
Social Security:Demographic Time Bomb
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table II.F.19
Beneficiaries per 100 Covered Workers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
IntermediateLow CostHigh Cost
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
4
Baby Boom in a PayGo System
• Seeds of the Problem• Boomers in the work force
• Easy to pay high per-retiree benefits to early (small) cohorts of retirees
• The Problem Blossoms• Boomers in retirement
• High per-retiree benefits are expected (promised)
• Large number of retirees
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
5
OASDI Trust Fund Ratio
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Intermediate
Low Cost
High Cost
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table II.F.20
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
6
OASDI Trust Fund Ratios
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table I.G3.
Intermediate Low Cost High CostMaximum trust fund ratio (%) 421 574 301Year attained 2013 2018 2009Year of exhaustion 2037 -- 2026
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
7
Trust Fund Operations(Intermediate Projection)
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table III.B2.
First year outgo exceeds income excl. interest: 2015
First year outgo exceeds total income: 2025
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Bill
ions
of
2000
dol
lars
Income excl. interestTotal incomeOutgo
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
8
Income and Cost Rates: Intermediate
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table II.F.13
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Per
cent
of
taxa
ble
payr
oll
Income Rate
Cost Rate
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
9
Income and Cost Rates:Low Cost
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table II.F.13
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Per
cent
of
taxa
ble
payr
oll
Income Rate
Cost Rate
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
10
Income and Cost Rates:High Cost
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Table II.F.13
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Per
cent
of
taxa
ble
payr
oll
Income Rate
Cost Rate
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
11
Actuarial BalanceIntermediate Income rate Cost rate Balance 2000 - 2024 12.76 12.30 0.46 2025 - 2049 13.11 17.55 -4.44 2050 - 2074 13.26 18.67 -5.42 2000 - 2074 13.51 15.40 -1.89Low Cost Income rate Cost rate Balance 2000 - 2024 12.73 11.30 1.43 2025 - 2049 12.98 14.65 -1.68 2050 - 2074 13.03 14.04 -1.01 2000 - 2074 13.41 13.03 0.38High Cost Income rate Cost rate Balance 2000 - 2024 12.81 13.62 -0.81 2025 - 2049 13.27 21.11 -7.84 2050 - 2074 13.59 25.40 -11.81 2000 - 2074 13.65 18.65 -5.00
Source: 2000 OASDI Trustees Report, Tables I.G1 and I.G2.
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
12
75-Year Actuarial Balance and Annual Balance in 2075
(percent of taxable payroll)
Source: Tables I.G2 and II.F13
75-Year Actuarial Balance
Annual Balance in 2075
Intermediate -1.89 -6.19Low Cost 0.38 -0.86High Cost -5.00 -14.50
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
13
Why Should the Government Provide Retirement Income?
• Myopia/Ignorance of Individuals?
• Adverse Selection in Private Annuities• Compulsory program is immune to adverse
selection
• Moral Hazard of Individual Savers • Government will not let them starve
• Redistribution of Income• Intra-generational and inter-generational
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
14
PayGo vs. Funded
• PayGo• Decreases national capital accumulation
• Allows intergenerational risk sharing• Social Security began during Great Depression
• Requires intergenerational cooperation
• Funded • Increases capital accumulation and wages
• Does not rely on intergenerational cooperation• Does not allow intergenerational risk sharing
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
15
Strategies forFixing Social Security
• Changes within Current PayGo Framework
• Change the Structure to a Funded System• Funded system run by government• Funded system with limited individual control• Privatization• These changes require a transition that respects
currently accrued promises
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
16
Strategies in PayGo Framework
• Increase Contributions by Workers• Increase OASDI taxes
• increase tax rate or remove cap
• Increase retirement age
• Reduce Benefits Paid to Retirees• Increase retirement age• Tax Social Security benefits (redistributional)
• Earn Higher Return on Assets in Trust Fund• Invest in other assets such as equities
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
17
Moving to a Funded System
• $9 Trillion of Unfunded Liabilities • Transition to funded system cannot ignore these• Could issue “recognition bonds”
• People might accept less than 100% of claim
• Would increase debt/GDP from 0.35 to 1.25
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
18
Motivation for Equity Investment: Exploit the Equity Premium
• Equity Premium = Rate of return on stock minus riskless interest rate• Ex post equity premium - data presented below• Ex ante equity premium
• should guide investment
• unobservable
• No Free Lunch: Equity premium is risky
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
19
Average Annual Returns: Bonds, Bills, Stocks
-202468
1012141618
1926
-29
1930
s
1940
s
1950
s
1960
s
1970
s
1980
s
1990
s
30yr Bond
90day Bill
S&P 500
Source: CRSP
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
20
Equity Premium Relative to Bonds and Bills
-5
0
5
10
15
201
92
6-2
9
19
30
s
19
40
s
19
50
s
19
60
s
19
70
s
19
80
s
19
90
s
pe
rce
nt
pe
r ye
ar
30yr Bond
90day Bill
Source: CRSP
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
21
Will the Equity Premium Persist?
• Is the Market Overvalued?• Historically high price/earnings ratios
• Reversion to typical P/E would reduce returns
• Demographic Factors?
• Effect of Trust Fund Investment on Equity Premium?• Probably will reduce equity premium
• By how much?
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
22
Index of Stock Prices in Japan
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Jan-48 Mar-61 May-74 Jun-87 Aug-00
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
23
How Big is the Risk of Investing in Equities? - Conceptual Issues
• Who Bears the Risk of Low Investment Returns?• If Trust Fund invests in equities• If private accounts invest in equities
• Can the Trust Fund be Used to Share Risks across Generations?
• Intra-generational Distributional Issues• Social Security is more important for low-income
families• May bear more of the risk
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
24
Gore Plan – Debt Reduction
• “Prosperity for America’s Families – The Gore Lieberman Economic Plan”
• Pay off Federal debt to public by 2012• Current debt held by public: $3.4 trillion• Ten-year plan for $3 trillion public debt reduction
• $2.3 trillion from SS surplus• $0.45 trillion from Medicare surplus• $0.3 trillion (1/6 of non-SS/non-Medicare surplus) in
Surplus Reserve Fund
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
25
Gore Plan – Social Security
• Plan to extend solvency of SS system to 2054• Save SS surplus in lockbox• During years 2011-2050, use interest savings (from
reduced Federal debt) for Social Security• Reduce poverty among elderly women
• Reduce motherhood penalty (5 years credit for raising children)
• Increase widow’s benefit
• Retirement Savings Plus accounts• Matching tax credits (3-to-1 for low income)
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
26
Bush “Plan”Six Principles
• Do not change existing benefits for retirees or near-retirees
• Use SS surpluses only for future SS• Do not increase SS payroll taxes• Government must not invest SS funds in stock
market• Preserve disability and survivors components• Individually controlled, voluntary personal
retirement accounts
The Future of Social Security, Andrew B. Abel, October 4, 2000
27
Lockbox
• Trust Fund holds Treasury’s debt• Asset of Trust Fund
• Liability of Treasury
• No effect on net worth of consolidated Federal government
• Debt held by public • Claims on future tax revenues
• Treasury debt in Trust Fund is a claim on future tax revenue