financial weapons of mass destruction or portable alpha panacea imn plan sponsor and consultant...
TRANSCRIPT
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction or Portable Alpha Panacea
IMN Plan Sponsor and Consultant CircleSan Francisco
David LermanOctober 23, 2007
2© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
3© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: Why the Fuss?
•Google has how many entries on Portable Alpha?
•Surging popularity…every institutional equity based conference has at least one slot on portable alpha (aka, enhanced indexing, alpha -beta separation)
•Amount of assets a testimony to its elegance/efficacy
But why?
•Returns achieved by investors have been challenging
•Sub 4.5 % long rates don’t help. Neither does Sub-prime mess
•Failure of most long only active managers to consistently beat their benchmark
What’s an institutional investor to do?
4© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: What is it?
Simply put, portable alpha is a strategy whereby an investor mounts or ports an uncorrelated alpha asset generator on top of an indexed portfolio.
5© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: What does it look like?
Then
Traditionally, a long only equity manager are restricted in their search for excess returns. Large caps manager can’t drift beyond large caps and typically have to settle for “tilting” names like MSFT, JNJ and GE. They can’t short and they can’t do emerging markets or hedge funds.
Now
A manager can gain long, large cap exposure via S&P 500 futures (beta) and mount or “port” on top of this alpha from a separate source such as fixed-income, hedge funds, long/short strategies…etc
6© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: What does it look like? cont.
Illustration:
Institutional investor…Buys $100 million notional exposure through S&P 500 futures
Each futures has notional value of 1,530 x $250 = $382,500.
Position would require 261 futures contracts. [$100mm/$382,500 = 261]
But, futures collateral is only a fraction of notional amount
Collateral (aka Performance bond margin) for 261 futures contracts = 261 contracts x $19,688/contract = $5,138,568
So what do you do with the other $94.86 million?
7© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: What does it look like? cont.
As with many things in the U.S., like call centers, payroll, aircraft engine repairs (that’s not a misprint) The $94 million is essentially “outsourced”.
Where will you search for excess returns? The universe of asset classes is large.
What is your particular area of expertise?
What are the pros and cons?
Which derivatives will be utilized for the beta component?
8© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: Assembling the components
Where will you search for excess returns?
“Alphas are most frequently ported across asset classes, from quantitative equity or macro strategies or from hedge fund portfolios.” *
Beta + Alpha
S&P 500 Futures short duration fixed income portfolio
S&P 500 Swap hedge funds or fund of funds
S&P 500 Futures long/short strategy (e.g. active long small cap with short Russell 2000
futures overlay)
* Source: Goldman Sachs
9© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: Newer tools…
What’s new in portable alpha?
With the advent of futures on MSCI EAFE, plan sponsors, & money managers—with about $1.6 trillion benchmarked to EAFE—are beginning to port alpha onto EAFE futures contracts as liquidity grows
And just a few days ago, futures became available on MSCI’s Emerging Markets Index.
So the tools continue to grow…
10© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Pros and Cons concerning the “beta” source
Futures
Pros Cons
Incredibly liquid roll costs
Incredibly cheap collateral consider.
Highly transparent T.E. depending on product
used*
Virtually no counterparty risk
*For actively traded index futures contracts, Tracking error is insignificant—especially with adventof month end fair value calculation
OTC Swap Market
Pros Cons
No roll cost Counterparty issues
No T.E little transparency
Costlier than futures
11© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Sampling of Global Stock Index Beta LiquidityAverage Daily USD Volume Month of August 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
S&P 500(CME)
EuroSTOXX(Eurex)
DAX futures(Eurex)
All 1440 ETFsGlobally
Nasdaq 100(CME)
Dow Jones(CME)
Russell 1000(ICE)
Ave
rag
e $
vol/d
ay in
bill
ion
s
Source: Goldman Sachs, CME Research
12© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Sampling of Global Stock Index Beta LiquidityAugust 2007 Month End Open Interest in USD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
S&P 500(CME)
EuroSTOXX(Eurex)
DAX futures(Eurex)
Nasdaq 100(CME)
Dow Jones(CME)
Russell 1000(ICE)
Op
en in
tere
st in
bill
ion
s
Source: Goldman Sachs, CME Research
13© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Cost of Initiating futures (Beta) position
14© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Cost of Initiating futures (Beta) position
Some stock index futures as well as other futures products have incredible liquidity.
S&P 500 futures (reg & mini)
Russell 2000 (reg & mini)
Nikkei 225 (USD/Yen)
EuroSTOXX
U.S. 10-yr Note futures
15© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Cost of Maintaining futures (Beta) Position
Just as important as the low cost and liquidity is the cost of maintaining the position. To maintain exposure, managers need to “roll” their positions to the next expiration.
Calendar Roll date S&P 500 Russell 2000
Sep 04 / Dec 04 9.10 -74.38
Dec 04 / Mar 05 10.59 -22.41
Mar 05 / Jun 05 3.04 -65.83
Jun 05 / Sep 05 2.90 -96.90
Sep 05 / Dec 06 -1.87 -64.19
Dec 06 / Mar 06 3.98 -98.81
Mar 06 / Jun 06 -3.22 -101.84
Jun 06 / Sep 06 -4.37 -70.77
Sep 06 / Dec 06 0.91 -77.51
Dec 06 / Mar 07 3.91 -63.62
Mar 07 / Jun 07 -2.75 -81.35
Jun 07 / Sep 07 -10.17 -96.06
Average 0.85 -76.14
Source: Richard Co, CME Research
16© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: Additional Considerations
While the basic tenant of portable alpha is simple, implementing the strategy is more complex. You have:
Risk management, monitoring, reporting and cash flows
…the beta portfolio
…the collateral issues for beta portfolio (margin calls)
…the ported alpha portfolio
Investor can assume responsibility for some or all of above or hire a provider to do some or all of above (i.e., unbundled, semibundled, integrated)
17© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Portable Alpha: Summary
►Portable alpha allows for diverse investment opportunities by allowing investors to choose
from a broad class of assets with a large mix of risk/return characteristics.
►Portable alpha doesn’t always mean lower risk…but diversification stated above can lower a
risk profile.
► Beta vehicles, such as the S&P 500 futures are among the most liquid futures contracts in
the world. They come with excellent transparency. For certain beta choices that do not have
liquid futures, the swap market is a good alternative
► Particular expertise is required in all of the choice of alpha generators—be it fixed income,
hedge funds or other strategies
► Insufficient positive excess returns from the alpha source and excessive costs will doom
portable alpha strategies.
18© Copyright CME Group, Inc. 2007. All rights reserved.
Quote of the day…
“I make presentations to pension plans with a half dozen active managers in style and market cap boxes. If these funds separated their alpha and beta, they would find risk and returns are nearly all beta. All they have is an expensive index fund”
Tim Harbert (Former CEO of State Street Global Advisors)