fio2013smpopoff
TRANSCRIPT
S L I D E 1
Coherent control of the total transmission of light through disordered media
Effect of the open geometry and the mesoscopic correlations
S. M. Popoff, A. Goetschy, S. F. Liew, A. D. Stone, H. Cao
S L I D E 2
People
Experimetal part Theoretical part
Seng-Fatt Liew
Pr. Hui Cao
Arthur Goetschy
Pr. Douglas Stone
S L I D E 3
Transmission in random scattering media
Why is white paint opaque?
R
T
πΏ
S L I D E 4
Transmission in random scattering media
Why is white paint opaque?
π βπ
πΏ
R
T
Can we modify the transmission?
πΏ
S L I D E 5
Transmission in random scattering media
Theoretical predictions
Bimodal distribution
p(T)
T
O.N. Dorokhov Solid State Commun. 1984 P.A. Mello et al. Ann. Phys. 1988
Y. Nazarov PRL 1994
N N
β β
π(π) βπ
π 1 β π
ππππ₯
π=
1
π
ππππ βͺ 1 ππππ₯ = 1
Mesoscopic correlations!
S L I D E 6
Motivations
Experimental measure of the TM
Acoustics: A. Aubry et al. PRL 2009 Optics: S.M. Popoff et al. PRL 2010
Quarter circle law
?
Remaining effects of mesoscopic correlations?
ππππ₯
π= (1 + πΎ)2< 4 πΎ =
ππππππ’π‘
ππππ₯
π> (1 + πΎ)2
S L I D E 7
Control of the total transmission
Goals:
β’ Control the input optical field on a scattering sample with a high degree of control (two polarizations phase modulation, high NA, large illumination area) to take advantage of mesoscopic correlations to maximize/minimize the total transmission.
β’ Understand the effect of mesoscopic correlations on the total transmission in an open geometry with a localized illumination.
Previous studies: β’ I.M. Vellekoop and A.P. Mosk, PRL, 2008 β’ M. Kim, Y. Choi, C. Yoon, W. Choi, J. Kim, Q.H. Park and W. Choi, Nat. Photon., 2012
S L I D E 8
Experimental setup
Ir
It
Ii
Ii: input intensity Ir: backscattered intensity It: total transmitted intensity
β’ High input NA, output NA~1 β’ 2 polarizations phase modulation
β’ Large number of segments (up to ~2000) β’ Control of input and backscattered intensity
S L I D E 9
Typical results
πΏ~20 ππ π~0.8 ππ π·~8.3 ππ ππππ₯ = 3.56 π ~18% ππππ = 0.32 π ~1.6% ππππ₯
ππππ ~ππ. π
~10 fold variation of the total transmission
Uncorrelated model gives ππππ₯~ 1.6 π , ππππ~0.5 π , ππππ₯
ππππ~π. π
Effect of correlations but no open channels because of imperfect control
S L I D E 10
Effect of the correlations
5 samples with thickness L between ~ 7 ΞΌm and 30 ΞΌm 7 illumination sizes D between ~ 2.7 ΞΌm and 8.3 ΞΌm Comparison with uncorrelated model (Marcenko Pastur)
1
2
3
10 15 20 25 30 35
4
1
2
3
3 4 5 6 7 8
S L I D E 11
Predictions of Tmax and effect of the geometry
ππππ₯ = 1 ππππ₯ =?
Effect of imperfect channel control known A. Goetschy and A. D. Stone, PRL, 2013
S L I D E 12
Theory of imperfect control of channels (1)
A. Goetschy and A. D. Stone, PRL, 2013
π1 =π1
πβ€ 1
π2 =π2
πβ€ 1
S L I D E 13
Theory of imperfect control of channels (2)
We showed and verified in simulation that this theory is true also for open geometries for m2=1 with the general definition of m1:
Implies a long range correlation term (C2) and depends on shape of the illumination beam
π‘
π‘
S L I D E 14
Theory vs experiments and simulations (1)
2D
β’ Good agreement with simulations (recursive Greenβs function) β’ Effect of the algorithm + phase only; π1 β πΌ π1with πΌ~0.26 (fitting)
S L I D E 15
Theory vs experiments and simulations (2)
3D
our model
our model with m1πΌ and πΌ~0.26
S L I D E 16
Conclusion
β’ Observation of a tenfold variation of the total transmission through a random scattering medium
β’ This results cannot be explained by an uncorrelated model; effect of the mesoscopic correlations
β’ Developed a model that explained the behavior of the transmission properties in open geometries with a localized illumination
S L I D E 17
Thank you!
More information about wavefront shaping:
www.wavefrontshaping.net
www.wavefrontshaping.com
(COPS at University of Twente)
S L I D E 18
Effect of the correlations (2)
= 0.9 0.66 0.46 0.39 0.17 0.07
1
1.4
1.8
2.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
S L I D E 19
Theory of imperfect control of channels (2)