fire and fi-ppp
DESCRIPTION
FIRE Vision 2020 pre-FIA workshop: FIRE and FI-PPP - Mike Surridge (FI-PPP INFINITY & XIFI, IT Innovation)TRANSCRIPT
THE INFINITY PROJECT THE INFINITY PROJECT
Mike Surridge Dublin, 07 May 2013
FI-PPP Tradeoffs
THE INFINITY PROJECT
• Making the world smarter: accelerated sustainable innovation
• Making Europe a world leader in Future Internet technologies
Future Internet PPP
2 07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013
ICT applications research
ICT technology research
Application Pull
Technology Push
FI-PPP
THE INFINITY PROJECT
• Phases – Phase 1: scenarios and platforms
– Phase 2: capacity and trials
– Phase 3: innovation and expansion
• Objectives – Technology foundations:
• Phase 1-2: platform development
• Phase 3: extension and usage
– Capacity building: • Phase 1-2: identification • Phase 2: adaptation,
integration and federation
– Use cases: • Phase 1: requirements • Phase 2: early trials • Phase 3: expansion
– Facilitation and Support
FI-PPP Work Programme
3 07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013
Phase 3
Use Case
Expansion
CONCORD
INFINITY
FINEST
XIFI
FI-WARE Technology Foundation
SmartAgriFood
FI-CONTENT
FINSENY
Instant Mobility
OUTSMART
SAFECITY
ENVIROFI
FI-CONTENT
C-SPACE
FINESCE
FI-STAR
FITMAN
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Call 1 Call 2 Call 3
THE INFINITY PROJECT
07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013 4
FI-PPP Key Requirements
• Technology Foundation: commoditisation
– uniform (and inexpensive) access to FI resources
– reduce application development costs
• Use Cases: validation and expansion
– increase range of available FI applications
– increase user demand for FI applications
• Capacity Building: defragmentation
– allow applications developers and service providers to target a European market, not one city or sensor network at a time
– make FI infrastructure installations multi-functional, not one application at a time
THE INFINITY PROJECT
07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013 5
Trade Offs http://www.fi-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/FI-PPP-Phases-2-3-White-Paper-Draft-Final.pdf
FI-PPP Complementary
Activities
Use Cases
Infrastructure Operators
Application Developers
Service Providers and End Users
Technology Foundations
Capacity Building
TF provides interoperability CB provides capacity
More Applications in More Smart Cities/Spaces/
Regions/Enterprises
Lower Application Development Time
and Cost
Greater Returns on Investments
Simpler Access via Software Enablers
THE INFINITY PROJECT
• Dedicated or shared? – shared is typically cheaper
– dedicated provides greater certainty over performance and privacy/security
• Centralised or distributed? – centralised eases portability
for data analytics components
– centralised brings more data together for analysis
– distributed eliminates critical dependencies (economic and security dependencies)
FI-PPP Trade Offs Example: Shared or separate back-office services?
6
Dedicated or shared data centre(s)?
Distributed data sources and user communities
07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013
THE INFINITY PROJECT
07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013 7
Infrastructure Challenges Concern Location-centric, e.g.
embedded sensor nets User-centric, e.g. fixed /mobile social networks
Resource-centric, e.g. data transfer, storage, processing
User adoption
Need multi-purpose infra-structure enabling a wide range of applications.
Need transparency and reliability. Content regulation across borders.
Often decided by application providers, not directly by the end users. Driven by price, branding, jurisdiction, etc.
Security Many sensor test beds seem to lack basic security. User tracking and cyber-terrorism still a concern.
Basic security is addressed. But user profiling/tracking is still a concern, along with cyber crime against users.
Basic security is addressed. But secure value chains are not well supported. Hard to maintain end user trust.
Interop-erability
Transfer of applications between locations is still difficult.
Technical access is not a problem. But user lock-in and monopolies are a concern.
Cloud Computing Strategy already helping normalise technical interfaces and business terms/processes.
Sustain-ability
Often depends on public funding (local, regional or national). Fragmentation makes value less evident to potential investors.
Valorisation depends on scale of user community. Need to show value (over Facebook, etc.). Specialised networks may need public support.
Commercial service model clearly works in many cases. Need to show added value from FI (over Amazon, etc.).
THE INFINITY PROJECT
• INFINITY: identification
– online repository www.xipi.eu
– matchmaking for infrastructures
– analysis of opportunities and challenges for FI-PPP participation
– road map to address challenges
• XIFI: integration and federation
– capacity adaptation and integration
– federation to address fragmentation
– finding sustainable business models
– supporting trials and sharing best practices
Call To Arms
8 07 May 2013 (C) IT Innovation Centre and other FI-PPP participants, 2013
Phase 3
Use Case
Expansion
CONCORD
INFINITY
FINEST
XIFI
FI-WARE Technology Foundation
SmartAgriFood
FI-CONTENT
FINSENY
Instant Mobility
OUTSMART
SAFECITY
ENVIROFI
FI-CONTENT
C-SPACE
FINESCE
FI-STAR
FITMAN
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Call 1 Call 2 Call 3
• Capacity Building Objective – opportunity for infrastructure
to get involved
– FIRE, EIT ICT Labs, Living Labs, National Programmes, …
– research test beds, pilots and operational systems, …
THE INFINITY PROJECT
THANK YOU