fire emissions from luc: promoting credibility and incentives
TRANSCRIPT
Fire emissions from LUC:Promoting credibility and incentives
Daniel Murdiyarso
Multi-scale drivers and responses
Murdiyarso and Lebel 2007
Promoting credibility through MRVM IPCC – Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF activities
• Publish data (area, biomass data, carbon density) • Describe methodologies (measurements in 5 pools, use model• Include all greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4)• Document QA/QC procedures
R IPCC Reporting Principle – managed uncertainties•Consistency • Transparency•Comparability•Completeness•Accuracy
V Validation Project development phase•Estimation of future GHG emissions reductions to be achieved•Use models (historical trend, numeric, economic)
Verification Project monitoring phase•Confirmation of actual GHG emission reductions achieved
during crediting period•Compare between estimations and observations
Developing higher Tier EFs is possible
2006 IPCC Guidelines: 2013 Wetlands supplement
Indonesia has good practice MRV for emission hotspots in place
Linking GHG emissions and removals with IPCC Guidelines will ensure credibility
Fire emissions may be included
Concluding remarks