fire spread in car parks: findings from the clg/bre ... · pdf file• bs 7346-5 (2005) for...
TRANSCRIPT
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
HOWARD P. MORGANHOWARD P. MORGAN BSc PhD CPhys MInstP CEng FIFireE MBEngBSc PhD CPhys MInstP CEng FIFireE MBEng
International Fire Consultants LtdInternational Fire Consultants Ltd & &
Chairman of BSI/FSH/25Chairman of BSI/FSH/25
Fire Spread in Car Parks:
Findings from the CLG/BRE Research Programme
Fire Engineering and Smoke Control Issues for Car Parks
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Performance-based Codes of Practice for smoke control:
• BS 5588-7 (1997) for Atrium buildings• BS 5588-10 (1991) for shopping complexes• BS 7346-4 (2003) for steady-state SHEVS• BS 7346-5 (2005) for time-dependent SHEVS• BS 5588-11 (1997) Shops, offices, etc• BS 7974 (2004) and its PDs especially 1 & 2
Fire Safety Engineering• BS 9999 (2008) has absorbed most of the
methods in BS 5588 above.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Performance-based Codes of Practice for smoke control
• All these Codes have recommendations applying to limited aspects of car parks.
• BS 7346-7 (2006) for smoke and heat control in covered car parks has a menu-like structure and applies to all covered car parks.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Remarks
• The smoke control designer does not have to follow any of these provided they can produce a satisfactory justification for an alternative.
• These Codes give a clear framework for designers especially by giving “ baselines” for comparison with alternative methods.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
The role of Standards
• Standards try to achieve a common approach.• They try to resolve contradictions between
methods by providing committee forums.• I am here because of the interest of my
Committee BS/FSH/25, which not only has responsibility for keeping smoke control codes up to date, but also acts as liaison with CEN/TC191/SC1, which has a similar role in European Standards.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Recap
• All performance-based smoke control methods rest on a currently inadequate experimental base.
• Committee judgement is but a poor substitute, however often it is the only way forward.
• This worries people with a scientific and/or engineering background, including those working on Codes of Practice.
• FSH/25 welcomed the research programme by BRE/CLG as strengthening the Guidance
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
The Design Fire for a car park based on a large calorimeter study
Can use as time-dependent design fire .Use modelling to calculate the consequences of locating the Schleich Cajot & Joyeux fire curve in car park.
– Limited data suggests 2nd car involved grows faster than simple superposition
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
0 20 40 60 80Time [min]
Rate
of h
eat r
elea
se [M
W]
new
old
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
time (min)
rate
of h
eat r
elea
se (M
W)
one burning car
propagation fire
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Some questions about fire size
• If > 70% of fires spread beyond 1st car (study of UK Fire Stats, Courtesy Merseyside Fire & Rescue);
• If one car peaks at a transient 8 MW;• If subsequent cars burn faster than the first
(implied by one of Joyeux’s tests);• Should Codes of Practice rethink their
recommendations?• How important are sprinklers (currently
unenforceable via AD-B)?
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Expected effect of sprinklers
• Initial car relatively unaffected. Designed to keep out rain
• Adjacent cars protected against fire spread by film of water
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Steady-state design fires: from BS 7346-7 (2006). “Committee Compromise” Loosely
based on Shleich et al.
Fire Parameters Indoor car park without sprink ler system
Indoor car park with sprinkler system
Dimensions 5 m x 5 m 2 m x 5 m
Perimeter 20 m 14 m
Heat release rate 8,000 kW 4,000 kW
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
De Facto universal design fire
• “Best Documented Worst Case” has been Joyeux’s Large Car fire.
• This has been adopted for vehicles of different size and construction e.g. in BS 7346-7.
• Has been applied to different forms of smoke control.
• We expect some variation in real car fires.• Is current Guidance acceptable?• Was it before?
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Smoke Control Methods depending on realistic design fires
• Impulse ventilation system (IVS)
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
IVS Principle – Developed for tunnels
• Impulse Ventilation Systems (IVS).
– Used in tunnels for many years.– Principle:
• Jet fans add momentum to bulk airflow.• Bulk airflow stops advance of smoke in 1 direction.• Downstream: cars drive away.• Upstream: cars are trapped but safe.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Principles of IVS in Car Parks Schematic Section
• Jetfans under ceiling, Arranged to give a uniform air flow through car park storey
– Exhaust: Fan(s) or Natural (Fans shown here).
– Inlet: Natural Opening or Fan(s).
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Design Objectives
• Different levels of performance:
1. Smoke Clearance: Most common method in UKAfter fire has been suppressed.
2. Smoke Control: Main form of IVS in Belgium and Netherlands
Assist Fire-Fighters in finding & extinguishing the fire.
3. Protect Means of Escape (MoE). Very Rare Must be fire-engineered case-by-case
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Very wide car parks
• Can impulse ventilation work without side walls to channel the air flows?
• Can jetfans and exhausts be co-ordinated to clear smoke from Zones leaving neighbouring zones smoke free? (e.g. a zone of 50 m in a car park 3 or more zones wide)
• How good are CFD analyses at “proving” such zoned systems?
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Fire Protection in a Multi-Storey Automated (Stacking) Car Park
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
What is a “stacking” car park?
• Eliminates or reduces need for roadways within car park
• Machinery used to place and retrieve cars • Maximises number of car parking bays • Minimises plan area of car park• Reduces or eliminates horizontal separation
between levels.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Hi-rack storage type
• Effectively like high-bay racking storage but with cars instead of palettes.
• Fully automatic machinery, no-one in parking space while cars being moved.
• Can be many metres high.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Problem of systems where there is no f-r separation between levels of cars
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Schematic plan view of typical storey: car in fire-resisting cell
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Partial Elevation, Schematic view across atrium: car in fire-resting cell
type
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Car in concrete cell: comments
• Better protection for underside of higher cars• Automatic machinery in central atrium-like
space
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Expected use of results by Fire Engineers
• To model ASET as a part of risk analysis, based on a better-supported realistic design fire.
• May be CFD or Zone model
See following example of zone modelling
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Schematic showing smoke movement and location of maximum heat radiation hazard to higher cell.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Summary of results of calculation: With Sprinklers
With Sprinklers
3 car cell
No flashover
No flames in atrium
Fan exhaust for firefighter access – 37 m3/s
Fan exhaust for minimal damage – 38 m3/s
2 car cell
No flashover
No flames in atrium
Fan exhaust for firefighter access – 32 m3/s
Fan exhaust for minimal damage – 38 m3/s
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Further uses of data
• Many Zone &/or CFD models can use data measured close to the fire to predict visibility in a car park.
• Ditto for most toxic products including CO2.
• Modelling CO/Smoke combined systems based on calorimetry data.
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
Concluding Remarks
• Code drafting and checking procedures inevitably mean that Codes can take a long time to incorporate new information
• The Fire Safety Engineering procedures are essential if new or revised design methods are to be adopted while waiting for Codes to catch up
IFCIFCGroupGroup
Copyright © International Fire Consultants Ltd
THE END