first post implementation review for the wichita falls (tx ... · pdf fileacknowleooement of...

April 10, 2013

Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7012 2920 0000 8277 3451

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Wichita Falls, Texas Mail Processing Annex (MPA) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR.

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

( CA20 13-364)

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Wichita Falls MPA

Street Address: 1343 Hatton Drive City: Wichita Falls

State: TX 50 Facility ZIP Code: 76302

District: Ft. Worth Area: Southwest

Finance Number: 489720 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 763

Miles to Gaining Facility: 108.7 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: n/a Senior Plant Manager: Larry Wagener

District Manager: Tim Vierling

Facility Name & Type: Fort Worth P&DC Street Address: 4600 FM 3311

City: Ft. Worth State: TX

50 Facility ZIP Code: 76161 District: Ft. Worth

Area: Southwest Finance Number: 483221

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 760-762, 764 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Larry Wagener Senior Plant Manager: Larry Wagener

District Manager: Tim Vierling

Approval Date: February 4, 2011 Implementation Date: Jul-01-2011

PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011:

Processing Days per Year: 310 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750

EAS Hours per Year: 1,825 Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/

New Facility Start-up Costs Update

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

Area Vice President: Jo Ann Feindt Vice President, Network Operations: David E Williams

Area AMP Coordinator: Steve Jackson NAI Contact: Cindy Venable I Sarah Grover

REDACTED

Dec-31-2011

May 27,2009

03-13-2013 15:16

PIR Data Entry Page

Finance Number. Current SCF ZIP COli~!!!<}:

of Distribution ConsoUdated:

Gil!ining

Fim:mce Numbflr: Curr®nt SCF ZIP Col~el~ll:

!m~llervuulm~ion Date:

Date of Dam: to

ACKNOWLEOOEMeNT OF ACCOUNTABILITY • lal:itnm<-oo !hill I am ~ ii!rn:l lll,WOf!lng lt1e lflleglity Of 1111 offlell!i po~~tll! raponing fln<!ncJai ~·end~ relalll:~ lO C.Qfltracling, oornp~ or slm!ll!i' efi'Cfle llllfcMng the tll'>~llland expanditure of

lO !lei'Vice tc

g}!!INGFA~

Plant lll!amu~er:

GAJNJNG FACILrrYJ

Plant """'""""'~ .. ,..

P!R Approval Signatures

Executive Summary Last Saved· March 13. 2013 Date Range of Data·

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Savings/Costs

Staffing

Service

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint/Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved

Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

96.49% 96.46%

94.22% 94.59%

95.11% 91.42%

90.2%

PIR Type: 1st PIR Jul-01-2011 - Dec-31-2011

from Workhour Costs- Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Stafflng-Crafl

from Stafflng-PCESIEAS

from Service Performance & CSM





PIR Executive Summary

Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $66,970,769 $66,052,180 $61,853,181 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$3,216,230 $3,213,943 $9,768,543 (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $9,003,534 $8,730,060 $7,627,237 Transportation Costs $9,040,587 $9,347,286 $9,686,257

Maintenance Costs $21,598,011 $20,245,114 $20,807,174 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $109,829,132 $107,588,584 $109,742,391

Total One-Time Costs $0 $1,004,000 $564,052

Total First Year $109,829,132 $108,592,584 $110,306,443

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,428 1,397 1,320 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 97 94 78

1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP (Approved) AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings $5,117,589 $4,198,999 $918,589 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings 3) ($6,554,600) $2,286 (less Mamtrrrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $1,376,298 $1 '102,823 $273,474 Transportation Savings ($645,669) ($338,970) ($306,699)

Maintenance Savings $790,837 ($562,060) $1,352,897 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings $86,740 ($2, 153,807) $2,240,547

Total One-Time Costs ($564,052) $439,948 ($1 ,004,000)

Total First Year Savings $1,236,547

Staffing Craft Position Loss 108 77 31

PCES/EAS Position Loss 19 16 3

PIR Executive Summary

Summary Narrative Last Saved: March 13, 2013

Losing Facility Name and Type: Wichita Falls MPA Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 763

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Fort Worth P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 760-762, 764

Background:

The Southwest Area. with the assistance of the Fort Worth District, has completed the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Area Mail Processing (AMP) that consolidated originating and destinating mail from the Wichita Falls Mail Processing Annex (MPA) into the Fort Worth Processing & Distribution Center (P&DC). The last day of processing mail at the Wichita Falls facility was MODS day May 20, 2011. The first day of processing SCF763 mail at Fort Worth P&DC was May 22, 2011. The data for the pre-AMP period was Jul-01-2009 through Jun-30-2010 and included all operations for the Wichita Falls MPA and the Fort Worth P&DC. The data for the first PIR is July 1, 2011 thru December31, 2011.

Financial Summary:

Total Annual Savings

Total First Year Savings

First PIR Vs Pre-AMP

$86,740

($477,312)

First PIR Vs Proposed

($2, 153,807)

($1 ,713,859)

During the PIR period carriers from Bridge Creek and Morningside were moved into the Wichita Falls MPA and placed under its finance number. The shared finance number now includes costs of function 2 carrier operations and additional function 4 customer service operations not included in the AMP. This change impacts the savings noted in the PIR documentation. Additional costs in non-processing craft workhour savings amount to approximately $6,497,017. If these costs were removed, the AMP would show total annual savings of $6,583,757 and total first year savings of $6,019,705 (PIR vs Pre-AMP).

Customer Service Considerations:

There were no changes to the hours of the retail or Business Mail Acceptance Unit at Wichita Falls.

The EXFC overnight, 2-day and 3-day mail service performance is shown below for the Wichita Falls MPA and the Fort Worth P&DC.

04 2010 97.34 96.26 ~

01 2011 96.60 96.39 91.64

92.26 69.80 02 2011 96.U3 92.38 90.65

96.81 95.05 92.80 03 2011 96.53 96.118 94.37

. __ 96.11.____ ...J!.5,5L .. ---~R._ .. _ _<!~_ . ___ J!§.Ji§.. __ -~"5.12 ____ _94.,~!~

~ After 2012 _J!!i.46 94.59 - .. ll:-11.._ AMP

2012

f.."'-''-"-"-'-4---'!!S.A!..... 94.22

2012

PIR Summary Narrative

Transportation Changes:

The approved AMP projected an annual Transportation cost of $3,832,154, an increase of $306,699 from pre-AMP. The first PIR cost was actually $4,030,358. The increase in transportation costs is attributed to a significant rise in fuel costs.

A number of Highway Contract Routes (75395, 763AA, 76315, 76331, 76332, 76333, 76334, 76335, 76336, and 76365) were terminated and then solicited as one consolidated Highway Contract Route (760N9). The new route originates at the Fort Worth P&DC and delivers to each Associate Office without utilizing a Hub. Due to the implementation of a Saturday 0/G AMP to North Texas, on Saturday this route transports all collection mail into the North Texas P&DC before ending at the Fort Worth P&DC.

Staffing Impacts:

The approved AMP proposal identified a net reduction of 31 craft employees and 3 EAS employee positions due to the consolidation of originating operations into the Fort Worth P&DC. Current complement data shows that the net complement has been reduced by 108 craft employees and 19 EAS employees through attrition and transfers. Please note that the complement numbers below do include Function 4 employees for the losing site, as they are included in the staffing information shown in the PIR workbook.

Crall $ FIR + P'TR • PTR • C<>sw~ls Crt~ff Ill losiflg :s.re ine~Jiles f<~l'ictl0fl4


Maintenance Impacts:

The approved AMP projected an annual maintenance savings of $1,352,897 with the consolidation of originating and destinating operations into the Fort Worth P&DC. The savings were attributed to a net reduction of total machines and reduction in square footage of facilities to maintain due to the closure of two large carrier units in Wichita Falls. The first PIR is projecting an annual savings of $790,837. To date, the two carrier units have remained open as suitable alternative accommodations for their retail and box sections have not been arranged.

Space Impacts and One-Time Costs:

The approved AMP projected total one-time costs of $1,004,000. This included a projected $462,000 for employee relocation, $22,000 for machine relocation and/or excessing (3 DBCS, 1 DIOSS, and 1 UFSM), and $10,000 to relocate carrier cases and other equipment from the two carrier units into the former MPA building. Also included in the one-time costs was $510,000 in building modifications at the Fort Worth P&DC. This was the anticipated cost to provide additional HVAC and electrical capacity for two areas which would house mail processing equipment and to expand the MTE processing facility located behind the Fort Worth plant.

The actual cost for employee relocation was sharply lower than anticipated, due to fewer employees relocating outside of 50 miles from their former duty station. The total relocation costs incurred were $19,837. Other one-time costs were as follows:

Site Prep and Machine Movement Expansion of MTE Processing Building HVAC Expansion TOTAL

$154,164 $210,138 $179,913 $544,215

The grand total one-time costs resulting from this AMP amounted to $564,052.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: March 13, 2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 07/01/11

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA District: Ft. Worth

04 2010 01 2011 96.63 94.00 02 2011 92.26 89.80 79.32 03 2011 96.81 95.05 92.80

04 2011 96.11 95.53 94.33

After AMP 01 2012 96.49 94.22 95.11 02 2012

Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC District: Ft. Worth

(15) Notes: __ s~C~F..;;7~6~3.;;u-:-se~d~fo~r.,.LiFos;;rinrg;:..;.S-.ite;;..;;E;.,;X,;,.F.;;.C __________ _ SCF 763 used for CEM

Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement ( reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM.

Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)

············~···=···'·'············ ., .... ·"' .. c.:.:.: .. ~: ••.•• , ....•.•. : .. c.:.: .. : .• :.c .... 1satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)

+··············· •. : ... :.... •. 1satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending) Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO)

.... ::::.:: .. :.~ ............... + ..•. : .. ~.:.:.~.: .. : ... :...... , ........... .::.::::.:: .. : .. : ............... 1Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact with

'-----'=.;;---'--....:..;=:;.,:c:.. _ _,__..:...:::.:.=.:..:...---llikely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

~-- Combined Facilities I

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig &Oest

Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities Last Saved- March 13,2013

PIR Type"': .:._~~:.~:,.~~-~~"''

Date Range of Data: ---~ to Oec..J1-2Q11

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined F acUities

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Combined F aci!ities

PIR Workhour Costs~ Combined Facilities

(27)NOTES:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .i¢1114/ZQOO,,

P!R Workhour Costs - Combined F aciHHes

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest

Workhour Costs -Losing Facility Last Saved: March 13, 2013

PIR Type•: ~c.E'_I~-cc===iliedfui"f';;,,p,R

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011 to Dec-31-2011 --------

PIR Workhour Costs - Losing

P!R Workhour Costs • Losing

PI R Workhour Costs - Losing

PIR Workhour Costs • Losing

~v 11412008

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Losing

Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility Last Saved_ March 13, 2013

Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC PIR Type*: ~:..::~~ .~ ~,-,; ~~·" ~'~~~~"~"~~~DID

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest Date Range of Data: Ju1..o1~2011 to oec,J1.Z011

P!R Workhour Costs~ Gaining

PI R Workhour Costs ~ Gaining

PI R Workhour Costs - Gaining

P!R Workhour Costs~ Gaining

(27)NOTES: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _

PIR Workhour Costs~ Gaining

I Other Workhour Move Analysis I Los>ng Facilrty: Wichrta Falls MPA 12/31111

PIR Other Workhour Costs

PI R Other Work hour Costs

129,856 $5,515,"13 131,792 $5,655,89 $ 1,937 1_49'l $140,76€

398,520 $17,760,681 400,755 $18,158,57 $ 2,235 0.56{) $397,8&;

174,727 $8,730,06 141,443 $7,627,23 $ -33,284 -1R05'X -$1,102,823

9,392 $301,63 6.448 $211.38 $( -2,944 ·31.34"A ~$90,250

784,392 $35,219,81 911,585 $41,210,24 $ 127,193 16.22° $5,990,431

PI R Other Work hour Costs

Staffing -Craft Last Saved: March 13, 2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 03/07/12

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA Finance #: 489720

<n ·. (2) dt I (4) (6 (7}··········· (8) (9)

Casuai/PSE On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total On-Rolls Craft Positions

PreAMP 1st PIR 1st PIR Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1-Cierk } 0 0 ·.·· ..... •··•··. 0 0 I< .\ 261 3 ···.···•·. • 261 3 Function 4 - Clerk .. · < 0 0 \ < 1 0 .• _:_. ·.··. 21. 9 •·~ 9 Function 1 - Mail Handler 0 0 ·. , .... 0 < 12 0 .··. •• ·•·· 0 0

IF'I.Jrlction 4- Mail Handler 0 0 " 0 < .. 0 0 I• ••.

---..:::6~-~----MIII ~~~~~3A~-~V~eh~i~cl~e~S~e~N~i~~------~·<~··~·····~~·~~·------0o~~ .. --··~··~~----~o1~-~-~ .. +----~O~H~~····~·

Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/Rehab/WC 111111M•Z:=:Jo~· · t==~o[f.;: •·· •:t; ·<4•··tf 0===:1~ Function 38- Maintenance ~ · .. · · ., _ ... 27 24 ~

0 1 99 88 ~O..:::t.:.:.he:::.:r:..::::F.:.::u~nc~ti:-o~ns:._::::..:.:::::::.:._=:.:::.::::..:...:.:::: ___ -Jllllll • . 0 I \\ 0 8 < 89 80

Total o .<< 2 91.<• .. 175 117 ..•. 127 126

Variances Total On-Rolls (10) (11)

Change 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis Pre AMP Proposed

Positions (61) (1) Percent -33% -(U3%

Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC Finance#: 483221

(15) • <16t I (17) ·•.··•· {tsJ. (191 (20)

Casuai/PSE On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total On-Rolls

f=:::~C::.~:.:.~~;:.:!:.::;~.:.:.~.:.:.~-~-3~:;;;:::.::;,:.:.,:..,..a-:o...,:.,..~-~-n-s _______ ~ •..••• -Pre~· .... A-:=;.o:;..· +--1s_t_P_':::.::-1 535

r .~~~ ,,,, PIR~0~~!'1 .... '" p;•6;6:a:lf-+-P-ro_p_o~i6;:::.:5;=-+-_1_s_t p..::i~i~~-~~ Function 3A- Vehicle SeNice ., , , •.. . ·. 69 I.!.F,..:::u.:.:.n:::.:ct::.::io:.:.:n_3:::,:B:::_-:.::M::::.a::.;inc;::te::.:n::::.a::.:n~::::::_ ______ -a..··,....·· 6 8 ·· ,··. 1 1 218 204 •·•·· .. __ ..::2::.25=+----~21.:.;3~111 ~F,.::u.:.:.n.::;ct;.::io::..:n~s..:::6.:...7·...::6..:::9_-..::L.:.:.m:.::td:.:.IR:..:.e.::;h~a:.:b~IW~C-----111111111ii~ 1 . < .2 0 < 60 52 · 62 62 52 Other Functions ~ 0 I ..• 0 0 ·•· ··. 8 8 . <• c 8 8 8 Total .. · .. ·.•· 36 61 ..... · ... ·. 3o 3 1.175 1,130 ' 1,241 1,270 1,194

,-----(23)-----;------(24)-----; l l l j 1st PIR vs Pre AMP j 1st PIR vs Proposed t

Total Craft Position Loss: j 108 j 77 j "'·-·-·-·---·-· ..... ·-----·-----·" (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

--- >C ] Variances Total On-Rolls

Change Analysis

(21) (22)

1st PIR vs PreAMP

Positions 147) Percent ·3.8'%

1st PIR vs Proposed

(76)

-6.0%

(ev415110 ·

PIR Staffing- Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA Data Extraction Date· 317/2012

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing

(1) (2)

I:Pr•(;~• (4)

Une Position Title Level 1st P!R

1 POSTMASTER (F) EAS-24 I: '1:. · .. 0 2 MGR MAIL PROCESSING OPERATIONS EAS-19 : (·.:·.····· 0 3 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-18

~ 0

4 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 0 5 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 0 6 MGR CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-22 .· .... ·~··· '• 0 7 SUPV CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-17 •:a·.>i"'. 4

~CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-21 · .. ·t•·• ... ·· 0 V CUSTOMER SERVICES EAS-17 .~·· 0

10 POSTMASTER EAS-22 .. :.·.·•:.:·•.••.·.:: 1 11 .. .,, •:: :

12 : >:. 13 .......... 14 I: •, .. 15 WJChita positions include Wichita Fails PO and .. ,;. 16 Morningside Station • both were included in approved AMP .... . 17 ·.·· .;.. 18 .. :·,,:: 19 . •·,········ 20 ·;:,· 21 .. : : .. 22 I ... ····• 23 · ............

I 241 :.·:

m :, ./i .: :· ··:·

·.·:·.·.··· 28 ·' .;.:•.< : 29 ; ·.,j:{ .......

30 ;::,,, .•' 31 ···,··:. 32 :L.

, 33 ·.··

,. 34 .· .. ····· 35 I . : ,: ,. , 36 · .. •···· .. .". 37 I.,. ,. : . 38 .. ,•,:

39 .•• 40 •.,: ··.

Last Saved: March 13, 2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Finance# _48_9_72_0 ____ _

On-Rolls

~~;:!1Pre (S/ > (6) (7)

lAMP:'•• Proposed 1st P!R

.:·. 1 .• 1 0

r·. 1 0 0

o: 0 0

.. 0 0 1

0 0

2 2

~ 1

.. ',

. ·•.•· · .

1" ........ 1

( '··· . ;:,.·,·

• I~ ,.:•':

········ .. .·. ':'

I~ . .' ...

PIR Staffing· PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC Finance# 483221 Data Extraction Date: 317/2012

Authorized On-Rolls

Staffing PCES/EAS Positions

(19) (20) (24) (25)

Line Position Title Level 1st P!R

PCES-01 1 EAS-25 0 EAS-25 0 EAS-24 0 EAS-24 0 EAS-24 EAS-22 2

TIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE EAS-22 0 EAS-21 2 EAS-21 1 0 EAS-21 2 0 EAS-20 2 2 EAS-20 0 0 EAS-20 1 EAS-19 1 EAS-19 1 EAS-19 0 EAS-19 EAS-18 1 EAS-18 2 EAS-17 4 4 EAS-17 45 37 EAS-17 10 9 EAS-17 4 4 EAS-16 1

26 SECRETARY (FLD) EAS-12 0 27 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS-22 0 28 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS-21 3 29 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLD) EAS-12 0 30 0 31 0 32 0 33 0 34 0 35 0 36 0 37 0 38 0 39 0 40 0

0 42 43 44 45 46

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Transportation - PVS Last Saved: March 13, 2013


Finance Number: _4;.::8..;:9.;..72::.0=--------

(1J .···. (2) ..

l>reAMP Proposed

PVS Owned Equipment ····· .,· Seven Ton Trucks .·; 0 0 Eleven Ton Trucks ·•··.·.······ 0 0 Single Axle Tractors . ~- d 0 Tandem Axle Tractors ·'· 0 0 Spotters • 0 0

PVS Transportation . >

Number of Schedules · .. >. 0 0 Total Annual Mileage . 9 0

Total Mileage Costs ····;; .. ·;-. ··· .. $0 $0

... > · ....• ·

PVS Leases . i·•· ... Total Vehicles Leased (/ .. ••....••.. 0 0

Total Lease Costs •. >. $0 $0

·· .. ·······•····. .•· PVS Workhour Costs ...............................

LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) .... · ..... $0 $0 LDC 34 (765, 766) I, ... $0 $0

Total Workhour Costs .·.·•··•••·••·· $0

$0

L .· > ..

(3) (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st

1st PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs AMP Prooosed

$0 $0

0

$0 $0 $0

$0

$0

$0 $0 $0

(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $140,766 (This number added to the Executive Summary

PIRType: 1st PIR -----------------Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011 --to-- Dec-31-2011

Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC

Finance Number: _4;.::8..;:3::.2::.2.:..1 -------

(6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Variance 1st Variance 1st

PreAMP Proposed PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs AMP Prooosed

PVS Owned Equipment Seven Ton Trucks . 0 0

Eleven Ton Trucks <·_· •.•...••. 0 /),. 0

Single Axle Tractors · .. ()> .•.. ···••· 0

Tandem Axle Tractors 0 ··• 0

Spotters o .. _ •..•....•. 0

PVS Transportation . _................... .. ...•..... ;

Number of Schedules ·•··.· ·.·.. () 0

Total Annual Mileage ··.·· 0 0

Total Mileage Costs ••. > ··.:::··0 $0 $0 $0

·····•··•·•· .. ,:>.> . PVS Leases ·. . ... Total Vehicles Leased 0 0 0

Total Lease Costs ••··... < $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

.'·.······.····· . </> PVS Workhour Costs •'>·

LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $304,192 $304,192 $278,167 ($26,025) ($26,025]

LDC 34 (765, 766) ;'>'("'" ...,_,, ....... $5,210,941 $5,377,732 $166,791 $166,791

Total Workhour Costs $5,515;t33 $5,515,133 $5,655,899 $140,766 $140,766

·.·

(12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $140,766 (This number added to the Executive Summary)

.

(13)No~s=----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------===============

PIR Transportation- PVS

(1)


Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Data of HCR Data File:

Route#

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 13, 2013

(7)

1st PIR Annual Cost

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing


Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest

Date of HCR Data File: July 2010

Transportation- HCR Last Saved: March 13, 2013

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

(6)

Proposed Annual Cost

(7)

PIR Type: Orig & Oest

CETforOGP:

CT for Outbound Dock: ------

1st PIR Annual CostJMile

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

(12) (13) 1 (14) Change Analysis

1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Losing

Gain in

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

$0

$504,904

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

1st PIR vs Proposed

$ $0

$198,204

Total Transpolfation

(15)

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

HCR $504,904 PVS $140,766

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $645,669 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16)

1st PIR vs Proposed

$198,204 $140,766

$338,970

I

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

MPE Inventory Last Saved: March 13, 2013

Data Extraction Date: 04/04/12 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011 --to-- Dec-31-2011

Losing Facility: ...:.Wi..:.;tc::.c...:.hi;;:.;ta;:_;_Fa:;::;l:.:..::ls...:.M~P.:...A:.._ _______ _ Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Equipment

I Proposed 1st PIR Variance in

PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Relocation Relocation Costs

Equipment I··· i, > Costs Costs

AFCS 0 ' 0 0 AFCS I 8 ! 8 7 $0 $0 $0

AFSM-ALL 0 0 0 AFSM-ALL 5 5 5 $0 $0 $0

APPS .'········ 0 ·•· !,· .. ·

0 0 APPS •·· ...• J .. · ,''''' 1 1 i $0 $0 $0

ClOSS 0 ··•••

0 0 ClOSS <x ii. ' 2 2 $0 $0 $o CSBCS .. · .. ·>. o··············· 0 0 CSBCS 0 . 0 0 $0 $0 $o DBCS .~ ··•··

0 0 DBCS ······•·• ai

40 39 I $15,000 $0 {$15,000)

DBCS-OSS . > ·o·•· •>·• 0 0 DBCS-OSS I' :TtP-i ... 0 0 $0 $0 $0

DIOSS ...

1 ' 0 0 DIOSS 5 :-:" 6 5 $5,000 $0 ($5,000)

FSS ><'i 0>''•• 0 0 FSS • 0 '' 0 0 $0 $0 so SBPS

. 0 0 0 SBPS ·.••·• 0 0 0 $0 $0 ${) UFSM ,···,······· 'J !. ' ' 0 0 UFSM I o••·· ........•. 0 0 $2,000 $0 ($2,000)

FC I MICRO MARK 1 ',' ... , •• 0 0 FC I MICRO MARK 1··········,,;, .o ,,'' 0 0 $0 $0 $0

ROBOT GANTRY i >(} ,,'' 0 0 ROBOT GANTRY ~7~ 0 0 $0 $0 $0

HSTSIHSUS 0 0 0 HSTSIHSUS ·o ... > 0 0 F $0 $0 $o LCTSILCUS ......•.••• o>•.··.• .····•· 0 0 LCTS I LCUS 4 4 4 $0 $0 $o

LIPS ' 0 0 0 LIPS [x····i .(') ''' 0 0 $0 $0 $0

MLOCR-ISS •.• :g.< /. 0 0 MLOCR-ISS ' ()'. ' ....... 0 0 I $0 $0 $0

MPBCS-OSS 0 ••••••

0 0 MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $o TABBER . . ) . V, 0 0 TABBER ' <· .o.. .•.. 0 0 $0 $0 $0

POWERED ,,'.

INDUSTRIAL .....•

0 0 VEHICLE ' <<

POWERED ,) f INDUSTRIAL

I "' ······••••······ 0 0 $0 $0 $0

VEHICLE

I. , •• > ••··•. · .. · .• ',i, ............... ? ...... ' >''(<. ·-c~

1.·'·······.'· 1,· .•...•. >) •••...

_:;_, . <' ..· < I ~····•·.• .. !• < '!:'.~· ... ··•· .. >'Pi; ···•••coi•· Totals r. .• a~> 1 ••. ~t·;'''··~~;i ···~·· .· •• 63•1 $22,000 $0 ($22,000)

(10) Notes: '',. .L' "-::.,.

Carried to I d.

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Two fewer automation machines utilized in FTW than initially planne

Relocation costs are shown on Spac;e&Costs page; these cannot be accurately separated from other site prep costs.

PIRrtOO~~ 62!'dO?J8J"¥

LOC36

Maintenance Last Saved: March 13, 2013

PIR Type*: _1_st_P_IR _____ _

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011 : Dec-31-2011

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA Gaining Facility: Fort Worth P&DC

Workhour Activity

Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning)

Maintenance Operations $

Suooo!!_ . .,

Parts and Supplies

Maintenance Stockroom and Supplies $

80S'Testi,ng GOn~l.lmablesOn!y $

$

$

$

$

$

$

....,.,""""--'-.;.....

-'-':--'-':---

Grand Total $ 2.291,626 $

(2)

Proposed Costs

0 $

219,106 $

447,737 $

202 $

18,256 $

685,302

126,000 $

(3)

1st PIR Costs

250,858 $

169,154 $

570,691 $

123,897

1,114,590 $

70,298 $

(4) Variance 1st PIR to PreAMP

(5) Variance 1st PIR to

429,288

LOC36

LOC38

LOC 39

Workhour Activity

Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning)

Maintenance Operations $

Support ............ ~ ... ,...,.

Parts and Supplies

----------------------------(8}

preAMP Costs

10,229,;291 $

$

3,345,238 $

1,204,398 $

15,103 $

$

(7)

Proposed Costs

10,229,;291 $

2,281,351 $

3,345,238 $

1,204,398 $

15,103 $

17,075,379 $

(8)

1st PIR Costs

10,687,257 ~

2,383,599 $

2,719,126 $

1,028,432 $

245,565 $

17,043,980 $

2,358,433 $ 2,578,306 $

(9) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre AMP

4$7,%6

82.248

230,462

347,300

(10) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre Proposed

457.966

82,248

230,462

219.873 Maintenance Stockroom

and Supplies $ ---- .. --:--

0 $. 0 $ 0 $

811,302 $ 1,184,888 $ $ 373,586 Grand Total

(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings: ------~~~~-------(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings: =---~~:,;,:::,:;:,:~====

$

o. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $

19,433,812 $ 19,622,286 $ 315,901

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

0

188,474

(13) ~OtE!S: _____________________________________________________ -========================================== •oata in PIR columns is annualiZed for Frrst PIR

rev_11$1200S:

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: March 13, 2013

Losing Facility : Wichita Falls MPA PIR Type: 1st PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2011 --to-- Dec-31-2011

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

DMM L001 DMM L011 (2) June 6, 2011

X DMM L002 X DMM L201

DMM L003 DMM L601 Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

DMM L004 DMM L602 (3) Yes

X DMM L005 DMM L603

DMM L006 DMM L604

DMM L007 DMM L605

DMM L008 DMM L606

DMM L009 X DMM L607

' DMM L010 DMM L801 --

(4l Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS

Facility Name Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code

Jan '12 Losing Facility 763 Wichita Falls TX

Feb '12 Losing Facility 763 Wichita Falls TX

Jan'12 Gaining Facility 760 Ft Worth TX

Feb '12 Gaining Facility 760 FtWorth TX

Total No-Show Late Arrival Open Schd Count % Count % Count %

n/a

n/a

804 178 22.14% 204 25.37% 0 0.00%

808 179 22.15% 200 24.75% 0 0.00%

Count

626

628

Closed %

77.86%

77.72% ------- - ----

(5) Notes: SCF 763 dropped at Ft Worth.

Unschd I Count

11

4

PIR Distribution Changes

Customer Service Issues

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA 5-Digit ZIP Code: 76302

Data Extraction Date: -;;0:;;-3/;;;2-.;;9/;:;1:;:-2------

1. Collection Points Mon.-Fri. Number picked up before 1 p.m. ....••..•• ,13 •.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m. 58

Number picked up after 5 p.m. . . ·· 7

Total Number of Collection Points 65

Last Saved March 13, 2013

3-Digit ZIP Code: 763

PIR ··'Sat. Mon. -Fri. Sat.

j) 12 41

44 ·, . 101 57

1 8

45·· 121 98

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"?

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? [-o~

4. Delivery Performance Report 1st PIR

Ouarter/FY Percent

% Carriers returning before 5 p.m. 042011 57.2%

01 2012 I 54.2%

02 2012

03 2012

3-Digit ZIP Code:

0

PIR

Sat.

0

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

I ~"- • Uft 1 1 Proposed 1.1 1st PIR

Start End Start I End 8:30 17:00 8:30 I 17:00

8:30 17:00 8:30 I 17:00

8:30 17:00 830 I 17:00

8:30 17:00 8:30 I 17:00

8:30 17:00 8:30 I 17:00

9:00 13:00 9·.oo 1 13:00

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual?

8. Notes:


9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? Fort Worth P&DC Fort Worth TX 760

Proposed Start End 10:00 5:00

10:00 5:00

10:00 5:00

10:00 5:00

10:00 5:00

closed closed

Yes

PIR PIR Mon. -Fri. Sat. Mon.- Fri. Sat.

0 0 0 0

1st PIR Start End 10:00 15:00

10:00 15:00

10:00 15:00

10:00 15:00

10:00 1500

closed closed

f!>\'1{9120011

PIR Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: March 13, 2013

Losing Facility: Wichita Falls MPA Date: __ __::0::;;51:.::0..:.:71_:_1::;:_2 __ _

1. Affected Facility

2. One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs: _....;;.$5;;;;2;.;;0"',000=-- $544,215 $24,215 (These numbers shown below under One~ Time Costs section.)

3. Savings Information

Space Savings($): __ ...;$;;;0 __ _ $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.

FTW acquired expanded MPE processing capacity to accommodate increased MPE requirements accruing from WFL AMP- used as planned.

Former WFL plant building now used to house carriers from Morningside and Bridge Creek stations; old buildings still open for retail and box

services, pending suitable smaller space being found.

5. Notes:

One-time costs above include MPE relocation costs- these cannot be accurately separated from other site prep costs.

Site Prep and Machine Movement $154,164, Expansion of MTE Processing Building $210,138, HVAC Expansion $179,913

total employee relocation costs incurred were $19,837

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs (from above)

Total One-Time Costs


FY 2010

$462,000 $19,837

$22,000 ($22,000)

$520,000 $24,215

$1,004,000 $564,052 ($439,948) PIR costs carried forward to Executive Summary)

Range of Report


FY 2011

{5)

1st PIR Cost per 1,000 Images

$0,00

$0 00

$0.00

$0 00

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

first post implementation review for the wichita falls (tx ... · pdf fileacknowleooement of...

Documents