flota arsenopyrite sep1

Upload: mohamed-draa

Post on 03-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    1/14

    Studies on Differential Flotation Characteristics of

    Arsenopyrite Pyrite Concentrate

    R K TUT J J QING U

    J T C SIEFKEN

    2

    AND V N MISRA

    2

    STR CT

    Investigation of the differential flotation characteristics between

    arsenopyrite and pyrite in a ore concentrate have been carried out on a

    laboratory Leeds flotation cell. Experimental results indicate that some

    limited separation between arsenopyrite and pyrite

    is

    possible by

    differential flotation under the conditions

    of

    high pH and low

    pulp

    redox

    potential. The best perfonnance in this testwonc was achieved by using an

    oxidizing agent at pH 10.7. Of the oxidizing agents tested, NaOCl gave

    better oxidizing effect than

    KMn 4

    I t has also

    been

    observed that the

    pulp redox potential depends on the

    pulp

    pH value.

    At

    high pH values a

    hydroxide layer is fonned on the arsenopyrite surface, which has the

    effect

    of

    a depressant on the arsenopyrite.

    INTRODUCTION

    Arsenopyrite is an arsenic mineral. It is usually associated with

    precious metal ores, and the minerals galena, sphalerite and

    pyrite. Its presence

    in

    an ore deposit can

    be

    of vital economic

    significance. Arsenopyrite may carry significant fraction of the

    gold present in certain ores. Such gold m ay b e present as separate

    grains between arsenopyrite crystals and may

    be

    extracted by

    direct cynidation Heinen

    et

    l 1980 . Gold can also be found in

    solid solution or small inclusions in arsenopyrite Clark, 1960

    which necessitates the us e

    of

    more unusual treatment techniques

    Addison, 1980 . It may be useful to separate arsenopyrite and

    pyrite so that they ca n be subsequently processed by different

    methods to recover gold.

    When arsenopyrite in an ore i s no t associated with gold values,

    it is considered to

    be

    a nuisance impurity and its selective

    depression is beneficial.

    Th e

    presence of arsenopyrite in sulphide

    concentrate ca n cause severe health hazards and generate arsine

    during pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processing and

    refining Habashi and Ismail, 1975 .

    Rotation is the

    only

    cost effective method for separation of

    arsenic bearing concentrate from pyrite.

    In

    the past few decades

    researchers

    h av e m ad e

    attempts to separate arsenopyrite and

    pyrite by flotation. In the early-1960s, several Russians scientists

    studied the separation of arsenopyrite and pyrite in the following

    way Glembotski, Klassen and Plaskin, 1963 :

    flotation of pyrite by reducing the dissolved oxygen;

    2. depression of arsenopyrite by using lime;

    3. depression

    of both

    minerals followed

    by

    activation

    of

    arsenopyrite using copper sulfate;

    4. depression of both minerals by using lime, followed by

    activation of pyrite by ammonium chloride; and

    5. depression of both minerals by using sodium sulfide

    which was removed subsequently

    by

    dewatering,

    followed by oxidation with oxidising agents pyrolusite .

    Beattie and Poling 1988 conducted laboratory flotation tests

    on

    several ores and bulk concentrates to evaluate the

    1. Western Australian School

    of

    Mines, PO

    Box

    597, Kalgoorlie

    WA6430.

    2. Kalgoorlie Metallurgical Laboratory, Chemistry Centre WA ,

    Department

    of

    Minerals and Energy,

    PO

    Bo x 881, Kalgoorlie

    WA6430.

    effectiveness of chemical oxidising agents as selective

    depressants for arsenopyrite. They reported that the maximum

    flotation recovery

    of

    arsenopyrite occured at pH values less than

    approximately 7.0. Increasing

    pH

    resulted in decreasing

    flotability of arsenopyrite only under oxidising condition. The

    selective depression of arsenopyrite from bulk pyrite-arsenopyrite

    concentrate was achieved through the use of an appropriate

    oxidising agents such as hydrogen peroxide or sodium

    hypochlorite.

    Li

    and Zhan 1989 showed that arsenopyrite could be

    depressed heavily in alkaline media. However, the presence of

    heavy metal ion, such as Cu

    2

    +,

    made separation difficult

    O Conner

    and Bradshaw 1990 recovered 74.8

    per

    cent

    arsenopyrite and only 8.4 per

    cent

    pyrite

    by

    two-stage differential

    flotation. They used dithiophosphate in the first s tage at pH

    and copper sulfa te and di th iocarbonate in the second stage of

    flotation. Iwasaki et l 1989 found that flotabil ity of

    arsenopyrite was improved in a nitrogen atmosphere and

    decreased markedly by increasing pH above 7.

    In this investigation an attempt was made to separate

    arsenopyrite and pyrite by differential flotation using a laboratory

    Leeds flotation cell. Rotation tests were carried ou t to observe

    the control that could be exerted over the flotation of arsenopyrite

    through the us e of oxidis ing agent. All f lotation tests were

    performed with an arsenopyrite-pyrite concentrate obtained from

    a Western Australian GoldMine.

    EXPERIMENT L

    Materials used were as follows:

    MIRC frother , PAX collector , NaOH pH modifier , NaOCI

    oxidant ,

    Ca OClh

    oxidant and

    KMn04

    oxidant .

    The

    ore

    sample studied was flotation concentrate 80 pe r cent passing 200

    mesh 74 microns produced from a flotation circuit. The major

    elements were determined

    by

    chemical analysis. Th e average

    contents are as follows: Au = 60 g/t,

    Fe

    =

    20

    per cent, S = 20 per

    cent, and As = ten per cent. Mineralogical examination using

    XRD, light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy

    showed that the concentrate was mainly composed of pyrite and

    arsenopyrite, with talc and minor quartz. The grains of these

    minerals ranged between 100 m and sub-micron sizes. The

    concentrate

    also

    contained minor amounts of iron-nickel

    sulpharsenide, slightly manganoan magnetite, galena and silver

    bearing gold with silver content estimated to

    be

    three to five

    per

    cent.

    Experimental procedure

    The flotation tests were conducted in a three litre Leeds flotation

    cell. The ore sample, unless otherwise stated, was tap water

    washed using a pressure ftlter; this was then used as the flotation

    feed. The pulp density was adjusted by addition oftap water to 25

    pe r cent by weight . The pH level was adjusted with NaOH.

    Unless otherwise stated, the dosage

    of

    PAX was

    50

    g/t and MIRC

    38 g/t

    of

    the flotation feed. The pulp redox potentia l Eh was

    adjusted either by NaOCI or by KMn04 and measured using a

    redox potential meter. The redox potential readings obtained from

    the meter were values relative to a Ag/AgCIIKCI 1.0 M

    reference at 25C. Th e feed was conditioned for tenminutes.

    Extractive Metallurgy of Gold

    and Base Metals

    Kalgoorlie 8 October

    99

    217

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    2/14

    R K TUTEJA, QING LID, T C SIEFKEN and V N MISRA

    TABLE 1

    lotation results

    the

    ee s

    cell

    Test No. Test Conditions

    Gr:lde )

    Recovery )

    Con. )

    Note

    pH Eh Oxidant

    FeAsS

    FeS2

    FeAsS FeS2

    1

    5.44

    121

    -

    16.0 28.9

    14.9 22.7

    21.1

    2. 8.44 100

    -

    13.5 35.4

    15.1 32.5

    24.9

    pH

    3.

    10.68 19

    -

    11.3

    47.8

    8.6 26.8

    16 3

    4.

    8.08 140

    NaOC1

    16.5 23.4

    22.2

    28.1

    30.7

    5.

    8.24 175 NaOCI

    17.8 12.2 23.0

    14.8

    29.0

    6. 8.10

    25 0

    NaOCI

    17.4 10.0

    18.1 8.5

    22.7 NaOCI

    7.

    4.80

    2 20

    Ca OClh 18.7 20.3 21.3 18.9

    26.1

    8.

    8.36

    -9 0

    KMn4

    16.5 28.6 21.0 29.5

    27.0

    9.

    4.30

    10 0

    KMn4

    21.7

    37.4

    61.6

    793

    59.6

    KMn4

    10.

    5.60

    16 0

    KMn04

    17.0

    35.9

    30.9

    53.6 41.4

    11.

    53 0

    36 0

    KMn04

    17.0 12.4 21.6

    27.8 30.8

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    In the present investigation, the following methods were tested:

    Flotation

    of

    pyrite by depressing arsenopyrite at high pH

    level;

    2. Flotation

    of

    pyrite by depressing arsenopyrite using

    oxidants; and

    3 The combination

    of

    the above two.

    The recoveries and grades of arsenopyrite and pyrite minerals

    under various test conditions are listed in Table 1

    :0

    I

    30

    t

    20

    0

    0

    _

    ---

    _ _ . 2

    ...n

    10 11

    Effect o f p H level

    From tests 1 to 3 as listed in Table 1 and plotted in Figure

    I,

    it

    can be seen that pH level has a small favourable effect on

    differential flotation between arsenopyrite and pyrite. The

    recovery

    of

    arsenopyrite decreases and recovery

    of

    pyrite

    increases, with increase in pH level. The highest recovery

    of

    pyrite 32.5 per cent) oeeured at pH 8.4 and the lowest recovery

    of

    arsenopyrite 8.6 per cent) oeeured atpH 10.7.

    The effect of change in pH on the grades of arsenopyrite and

    pyrite was similar

    to

    that

    of

    their recovery. The observation that

    the higher pH results in the poorer flotability

    of

    arsenopyrite

    agrees with that reported by Huang and Wang 1985). Further,

    according to Beattie and Po ling 1987) the oxidation

    of

    arsenopyrite above pH 7.0 resulted in a ferric hydroxide layer

    forming on the surface, which inhibited the oxidation of xanthate

    to dixanthogen. Although minor differential flotation between

    pyrite and arsenopyrite takes place, their grades in tailings do not

    show any significant change at different pH values.

    The pulp redox potential Eh was found to be significantly

    affected by changes in pH. As can be seen from Table

    I,

    the

    redox potential drops from

    121 to

    19

    mv

    as the pH increases from

    5.44 to 10.68.

    Therefore, it can be concluded that

    by

    controlling the pulp pH,

    a small amount of differential flotation between arsenopyrite and

    pyrite is possible.

    FIG

    I - E ffec t of

    pH

    level.

    Effect of oxidising

    agents

    Sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite as

    oxidising agents

    As shown in Figure 2 corresponding to tests 4 5 and 6) with

    increase in redox potential, the recoveries and grades

    of

    pyrite

    decrease more than those

    of

    arsenopyrite. Therefore it is the

    pyrite that is being depressed at higher redox potentials. This was

    also observed in test 7 where calcium hypochlorite was applied as

    an oxidising agent at pH 4.8.

    Potassium permanganate as an oxidising agent

    In test 8, where the original sample as received from the plant

    was used, much NaOH was added

    to

    raise the pH

    to

    8.36.

    Consequently, in spite

    of

    the small addition

    of

    KMn04, a

    negative redox potential was observed. In this test, both at a

    higher pH and in the oxidising environment, better performance

    was not achieved when compared to

    that

    of

    test

    2

    2 8

    Kalgoorlie 26 28 October 992

    Extractive Metallurgy

    of

    Gold and Base Metals

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    3/14

    Fio 2 - Effect of Eh using NaOCl.

    - _ r - - . . . . . . - - . . . . - _ _ : ~ - _ : : : - ~ : : .

    110 140 10 111 200

    .,.....---------------1

    I

    t

    o ~

    ......

    ~ ~ 1

    ~ . . . . . . . . - . a

    FLOTATION CHARAcrERISTICS OF ARSENOPYRITE/PYRITE

    arsenopyrite. Above a redox potential

    of

    150 mv a lower

    recovery

    of

    pyrite compared to arsenopyrite resulted. The

    arsenopyrite recovery, however, did not change significantly. The

    greater depressing effect

    of

    KMn04

    on arsenopyrite

    and

    pyrite is

    shown at higher redox potentials.

    3. The best conditions for differential flotation between

    arsenopyrite and pyrite

    as

    determined by

    this

    work.

    occurs when using an oxidising agent at a high pH.

    4. A high pH alone will not usually result in an effective

    differential flotation.

    Finally, from these series

    of

    flotation tests, the best differential

    flotation conditions for this type

    of

    sample are: maintaining a pH

    of

    10.7

    and addition

    of

    a small amount

    of

    NaOCI. However, these

    conditions alone will not result in an effective pyrite and

    arsenopyrite separation.

    KNOWLEDGEMENT

    tests 9,10 and 11 lower pH values were maintained and

    KMn04

    was used

    10

    adjust the redox potential. The best

    separation, as shown in Figure 3, occured at a redox potential

    of

    160mv.

    ~

    I

    litIloIIII 11

    i

    , ,- -,.n

    =s g

    21

    10

    .

    so

    1

    Ih mvl

    FIO 3 - Effec tof Eh using KMn04.

    ON LUSIONS

    1. In

    the differential flotation

    of

    arsenopyrite and pyrite pH

    is

    an important factor. The optimum pH suitable for

    depressing the arsenopyrite is 10.7.

    2. The pulp redox potential was found to

    be

    dependent on

    the pH. Even

    the redox potential is negative, flotation

    still occurs as long as the pH is suitably maintained.

    In

    addition, in terms of the surface oxidation, oxidant NaOCl

    shows much higher depressing behaviour than KMn04. The

    greater depressing effect

    of

    NaOCl on arsenopyrite at lower

    redox potentials resulted in higher recovery

    of

    pyrite compared

    to

    The authors wish to thank Or John Hosking, Director, Chemistry

    Centre (W.A.) for permission

    10

    present

    this

    paper and are also

    indebted 10 Or Tony Bagshaw and Professor David Spottiswood

    for their comments. This investigation was funded by a MERIWA

    grant, for which the authors are grateful.

    REFEREN ES

    Addison, R, 1980. Gold and silver ext ract ion from sulphide ores. Min

    Congr

    Oct, pp 47-54.

    Beauie, M J V and Poling, G W 1987. A study of the surface oxidation of

    arsenopyrite using cyclic voltarnetry, InJernational

    Mineral

    Proassing pp 87-108.

    Beauie, M J V and Poling, G W, 1988. Flotation depression of

    arsenopyrite through use of oxidising agents, Trans IMM 97(C), pp

    15-20 (The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy: London).

    Clark, L A 1960. The Fe-As-S system: phase relations and applications,

    Econ Geol 55,

    pp

    1631- 1652.

    Glembolski,

    V

    A, Klassen,

    V

    I and Plaksin, I N, 1963. Flotation,

    MonumenJ press New- York, USA, p

    540.

    Habashi, F and smail, M I, 1975. Health hazards and pollution in the

    metallurgical industry due to phosphine and arsine, CIM Bull

    August, pp 99-104.

    Heinen, H J, McClel1and,

    G

    E and Lindstrom, R E, 1980. Recovery

    of

    gold from tusenopyrite concentrates by cyanidation-carbon

    adsorption, USBM,

    RI

    8458, pp 1-40.

    Huang, K and Wong, D 1985. A study

    of

    selective flotation

    of

    antimonite

    and arsenopyrite, Nonfe ous Metals 37:(2), pp 22-29.

    Iwasaki, I Malicsi, AS

    Li X

    and Weiblen,

    P

    W, 1989. Insights into

    beneficiation losses

    of

    platinum group metals from gabboric rocks,

    Challenges in Mineral Processing Society of Mining

    Enginurs

    (Ed:

    P Somasundran), pp 433-447.

    Li G and Zhang, H 1989. Effect of alkaline oxidants and cupric ions on

    arsenopyrite flOlation,

    Nonfe ous

    Met Chin Sac Met, 41:(4), pp 27

    32.

    O Conner , C T Bradshaw, D J and Upton, A E, 1990. The use of

    dithiophosphates and dithiocarbonates for flotation of arsenopyrite,

    Miner Eng 3:(5), pp 447-459.

    Extractive Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals Kalgoorlie, 26 28October 1992

    219

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    4/14

    22

    Kalgoorlie

    8

    OCtober 1992

    Extractive Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    5/14

    Factors Affecting the Recovery and Grade of

    Complex Lead Zinc Ores by Flotation

    U NAY WIN

    AND D S Y

    2

    STR CT

    The size-by-size batch flotation behaviour and flotation rate constant

    of

    galena and sphalerite from three lead-zinc ores were determined. The

    experimental data were fitted

    to

    the Klimpel model

    o

    first order flotation

    kinetics.

    t

    was found that the flotation behaviour of the coarse +63

    J IlI1

    and

    fine -10

    lUD)

    size ranges of galena was significantly poorer than that of

    the intermediate -45+10

    J IlI1

    size range, and the fine size range of

    sphalerite was p oore r tha n the othe r size ranges. The flotation rate

    constant was found to be a maximum at some intermediate particle size.

    The contact angle

    o

    galena and sphalerite was measured under the

    same reagent condition as the flotation tests

    by

    using a simple method of

    bubble-particle attachmenL

    t

    was found that the ov er all flotation

    behaviour varied according to the trends in the contact angle.

    Bubble size was measured for the different types

    o

    frother used in the

    flotation tests.

    t

    was found that stronger frothers produced the smallest

    bubbles and gave high recovery and high flotation rates, while weaker

    frothers produced larger bubbles and gave higher grades.

    t was

    also found that the more complex mi;neral assemblages resulted in

    p oo re r fl ota tion b eh avi ou r t ha n t he o re c onta ining relative ly simple

    mineral assemblages.

    Differentiation between true flotation and the entrainment of mineral

    pa:ticles during the flotation process was determined. The results show

    that fine galena was entrained in the froths at

    short

    flotation times, and the

    true flotation rate constants were higher

    than

    the overall flotation rate

    constants for all size fractions

    o

    sphalerite and for all fractions greater

    than 10 J IlI1 for galena.

    INTRODUCTION

    Production o lead and zinc concentrates from complex lead-zinc

    ores

    by

    using froth flotation is

    an

    important part o the production

    o lead and zinc metals. the past, ores were high grade, there

    was only o ne metal o interest, and it was relatively simple

    to

    extract. However, this is no longer the case. Nearly every

    mineralisation has some problem either in the mining or the

    extraction o the metal.

    Most o the complex lea4-zinc ores contain lead-zinc minerals

    in finely disseminated form. Although flotation is by far the most

    important unit operation o mineral concentration, the recovery

    achieved by using flotation for these fine ores

    is

    often poor. This

    is because

    o

    the relationship among the various physical and

    chemical properties

    o

    fine particles, and their behaviour in

    flotation.

    Surface and electrochemical propertie o fine particles tend to

    be different from coarse particles of the SaI1)e material. Due to

    the small mass and momentum o fine particles, they are carried

    into the froth by entrainment, which

    is

    different from the

    mechanism o particle-bubble attachment in flotation.

    gangue

    minerals are included in such entrained particles, the result is a

    reduction in the grade

    o

    the concentrate.

    Finer mineral particles have higher specific surface energies

    and this may influence flotation in a number o ways. It may

    introduce undesirable impurities into solution, affecting

    1. Metallurgical Engineer, No 1 Mining Company, Kanbe Road,

    Yankin PO Rangoon, Myanmar.

    2. Senior Lecturer and Acting Head, Department ofMinerals

    Engineering and Extractive Metallurgy, WA School

    o

    Mines,

    PO Box 597, Kalgoorlie, WA 6430.

    collector/mineral interactions. Rapid oxidation may also render

    some minerals non-floatable under the conditions used for their

    flotation. The high surface energy

    o

    fine particles also increases

    the tendency

    o

    collectors to adsorb non-specifically. Fine

    particles have low collision probabilities because o their small

    mass, which results in a low flotation rate

    and

    low recovery. Fine

    particles at the liquid/vapour interface may also stabilise the

    froth, causing concentrate handling problems.

    Because

    o

    the extremely fine dissemination and interlocking

    o

    minerals in complex sulphide ores, the treatment

    o

    these ores

    represents one o the most complicated problems in base metal

    flotation. The difficulties

    arise

    in producing high grade or high

    recovery or both in flotation circuits. This problem comes from

    incomplete liberation, poor flotation response at fine particle size

    and/or interaction with some components

    o

    the complex ores.

    However, due

    to

    losses

    o

    mineral and metal values in the fine

    size range, considerable interest is growing in developing new

    processes and improving old processes for the recovery

    o

    fine

    particles. The objective

    o

    this work is

    to

    examine the flotation

    behaviour

    o

    fine particles in terms

    o

    the flotation kinetics of

    different size classes in lead and zinc concentration from bench

    scale flotation test work. The variables studied were type

    o

    frother, type o collector, collector concentration, and ore type.

    The principle recovery mechanisms are presumed to be

    genuine flotation bubble attachment and levitation) and

    entrainment carry-over with water which enters the concentrate

    via the froth). The other possible recovery mechanisms ,

    including entrapment in the froth, carrier flotation and the

    influence

    o

    slime coatings, froth modification by fines, or

    possible size effects associated with the return

    o

    particles from

    froth to pulp, are not considered.

    EFFECT

    OF P RTI LE

    SIZE ON FLOT TION

    Particle size is recognised as being a very important flotation

    variable, and major problems in flotation arise in many instances

    from the relatively poor response

    o

    coarse and very fine

    particles. Recovery falls sharply above 100

    lJ Il

    but only

    gradually below 10

    lJ Il

    No t all minerals show a maximum recovery in exactly the

    same size range, but there is no doubt that recovery

    is

    best for

    particles of an

    intermediate size.

    The presence

    o

    gangue minerals in the pulp

    ~ i g h t

    also effect

    different particle sizes differently. ~ v r y

    o

    glmgue durIng the

    tlotation

    o

    lead and zinc at Broken Hill was found to increase

    withdecreasing particle size, particularly below 10

    lJ Il

    Kelsall

    l 1974; Lynch and Thome, 1974). Granite gangue was

    recovered much better as the pulp became finer when synthetic

    mixtures o galena and granite were floated in laboratory batch

    cells Gaudin

    l

    1931). I t was attributed

    to

    mechanical

    carry-over

    o

    fme gangue. The entrained fine gangue causes a

    decrease in both concentrate grade and the flotation rate

    o

    the

    valuable mineral, with decreasing size.

    E X P E ~ E N T L P R O E D U R E

    Flotation tests

    Lead-zinc ores from three deposits, Cadjebut (WA), Woodlawn

    NSW) and Bawdwin Myanmar) were used for the flotation

    tests.

    ExtractiveMetallurgy of Gold

    and

    Base Metals

    Kalgoorlie 6 8 October 99

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    6/14

    UNAYWlNand

    OS

    YAN

    15

    00

    80

    60

    QI

    >

    0

    40

    QI

    l

    20

    10

    FIG 1 -

    Cumulative recovery

    of

    PbS at different times as a function

    of

    different size fractions, (0.023 kg/t NaCN, 0.05 kg/t NaEX, H407 0.022

    kg/t, pH 8.5 in PbS flotation of Cadjebut ore).

    20 - 40 60

    120 > 240 s _ Rate

    20

    30

    40 50 60

    Mean Size (microns)

    Flotation tests were conducted in a modified Leeds cell.

    Recrystallised sodium ethyl xanthate (NaEX), sodium amyl

    xanthate (NaAX), liquid CMS 41 (secondary butyl

    dithiophosphate) and CMS 42 (hexyl dithiophosphate) were used

    individually or in combination with one another as collectors.

    Liquid Nalflote series frothers (polyoxypropylene glycol ethers)

    and Dowfroth frothers (polypropylene glycol ether) were used

    individually as frothers. Sodium cyanide (NaCN), or a

    combination

    of

    sodium cyanide and zinc sulphate (NaCN +

    ZnS04), were used as depressants for sphalerite in the lead

    sulphide flotation. Copper sulphate (CUS04) was used as

    activator for sphalerite in the zinc sulphide flotation.

    Flotation concentrates and tailing were wet screened to

    produce six size fractions, -75+63 llm, -53+45

    l ffi,

    -45+38 llm,

    -38+20

    l ffi,

    -20+10

    l ffi

    and -10 llm. These size fractions were

    studied, in terms

    of

    flotation kinetics.

    Flotation response is a function of the three factors; chemical,

    equipment and operation factors. In this study, the equipment

    factors and operation factors (per cent solid, pulp density,

    temperature, air flow rate, ete ) were held constant.. Different

    types of kinetic models (First-order model, Gamma, Kelsall,

    Modified Kelsall and Klimpel model) were used to fit the

    experimental data, but the Klimpel model gave the best fit

    of

    the

    data.

    FIG

    2 - Cumulative recovery

    of

    Zns at different times as a function of

    different size fractions, (0.182 kg/t CUS04, 0.08 kg/t NaEX, H407 0.022

    kg/t,

    pH

    10.5 in Zns fltation of Cadjebut ore.

    60

    24 _ Rate

    20

    30

    40 50

    Mean Size (mlcrona)

    10

    lOO

    15

    80

    ::tl

    ;

    10 n

    60

    0

    i:

    >

    a

    40

    :

    5

    20

    Contact angle measurement

    The contact angle of galena and sphalerite were estimated using

    the bubble-particle attachment method (Hanning and Rutter,

    1989). This involves determining the diameter

    of

    the largest

    particle from a population of particles immersed in water that can

    be raised against gravity by a captive air bubble.. The contact

    angle can be calculated by using the equation

    of

    Scheludko t l

    (1976),

    as

    given below:

    d

    max

    =2

    3ywv 2 p g

    1{2 sin

    8 2

    (1)

    where d

    max

    maximum particle size captured by bubble

    Ywv surface tension

    of

    liquid-vapour

    p density difference between the solid and water

    g gravitational acceleration, and

    8 equilibrium contact angle

    Bubble size

    measurement

    The bubbles generated from the Leeds flotation cell were

    captured by a capillary tube at the centre

    of

    the cell. The bubbles

    are sucked up the capillary tube where the number

    of

    bubbles,

    as

    well

    as

    their diameter, were calculated using a Randall bubble

    size measurement unit. The unit detects the beginning and end

    of

    a bubble

    in

    the capillary as it passes a photo diode. For a

    capillary

    of

    known diameter, the volume

    of

    each bubble is

    measured and hence the bubble diameter is calculated.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The experimental data were fitted to the Klimpel model of first

    order flotation kinetics, as represented by equation

    2

    R = R_ [l-(l/(kt(1-exp(-kt] (2)

    where, R the cumulative recovery for time

    1

    R_ recovery at infinite time

    k flotation rate constant

    The effect of particle size on recovery and flotation rate

    Different particle sizes

    of

    galena and sphalerite exhibited

    different flotation rates.

    The results

    of

    the flotation tests using NaEx and Dowfroth 400

    are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Galena recoveries for all tests had

    similar characteristic curves. Sphalerile recoveries in other tests

    also had characteristic curves similar to

    Figure 2.

    Significant differences in recoveries and flotation rate constants

    were obtained for the different size fractions. The highest

    recovery and highest flotation rate were exhibited by the

    intermediate size fraction (-38+20

    l ffi)

    for PbS. With sphalerite

    flotation, there is no clear maximum in recovery and flotation rate

    over the size range measured, with xanthate as collector. The

    minimum flotation rate of sphalerite in Zns flotation is obtained

    in the fine size range, and the rate slightly increased with size.

    In

    the discussion of flotation kinetics here, the flotation rate

    constants of sphalerite in PbS flotat ion and the flotation rate

    constants

    of

    galena in

    Zns

    flotation have not been considered.

    The content

    of

    each mineral in the other mineral s concentrate

    may be due to incomplete liberation and the relation between the

    flotation rate constants of one mineral in the other mineral s

    concentrate and particle size was random. Hence their behaviour

    is uncertain.

    222

    Kalgoorlie, 26 -

    October 1992

    Extractive Metallurgy of Gold and Base Metals

  • 8/12/2019 flota arsenopyrite sep1

    7/14

    RECOVERY AND

    GRADE

    OF COMPLEX LEAD-ZINC ORES BY FLOTAnON

    A

    5IJm

    I

    CMS41

    CMS

    >

    CMS42

    CMS41 NaEJ