flow cytometric dna analyses of benign breast lesions ... · analysis of invasive breast carcinoma,...
TRANSCRIPT
Vol. 4, 1543-1547, June 1998 Clinical Cancer Research 1543
Flow Cytometric DNA Analyses of Benign Breast Lesions Detected
by Screening Mammography
Paul C. Stomper,’ James R. DeBloom II,
Rose Marie Budnick, and Carleton C. Stewart
Division of Diagnostic Imaging [P. C. S.l and Department of Flow
Cytometry [R. M. B.. C. C. S.], Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Schoolof Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New Yorkat Buffalo, and Department of Natural Sciences, Roswell Park
Division of the State University of New York at Buffalo [J. R. D.J,
Buffalo, New York 14263
ABSTRACT
There is little information regarding flow cytometricDNA analyses of benign breast lesions. This prospective
study consists of mammographic and pathological correla-
tion of DNA flow cytometric analyses of specimen mammog-raphy-guided fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) of 189 consecu-tive benign breast lesions and 114 FNAs of adjacent normal
tissue as a control. Clinical follow-up was also performed.
Aneuploidy was detected in 14 of 189 (7%) benign lesion
specimen mammography-guided FNAs and in only 1 of 114
(0.9%) FNAs of adjacent normal tissue (P = 0.01). Aneu-ploidy was detected in two (33%) benign intramammarylymph nodes compared with four (12%) benign lesions withatypia, one benign lesion (3%) with hyperplasia, four benign
lesions (10%) with adenosis, and three (4%) other benign
lesions (P = 0.01). There were no significant associationsbetween DNA content and S-phase percentage and patientage, mammographic appearance, or extent. During a me-
dian follow-up of 40 months (range, 6-84 months), 2 of 13
(15%) patients with aneuploid benign lesions developed ip-
silateral breast carcinoma compared with 5 of 175 (3%)patients with diploid benign lesions (odds ratio, 6.18; 95%
confidence interval, 1.08-35.56). Our data suggest that ane-uploidy, which is detected in a variety of benign breast
lesions, may be associated with a higher risk of development
of breast carcinoma. The combined techniques of specimenmammography-guided fine-needle aspiration and flow cy-tometry provide a practical translational research method
for the study of benign breast disease.
INTRODUCTION
The increased utilization of screening mammography has
led to increased numbers of either excisional or percutaneous
Received 1/5/98; revised 3/20/98: accepted 3/23/98.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with I 8 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
I To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division ofDiagnostic Imaging, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton
Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263. Phone: (716) 845-5796; Fax: (716) 845-
8759; E-mail: [email protected].
core needle biopsies of clinically occult lesions that subse-
quently prove to be benign. Whereas efforts should continue to
be made to decrease the number of false positive mammograms
and benign biopsies, the study of this biopsy material may lead
not only to further understanding of benign and premalignant
breast disease but also to a possible means of risk assessment for
the subsequent short- or long-term development of breast car-
cinoma for women who undergo benign breast biopsies.
There is little information in the literature regarding ploidy
and S-phase percentage analysis in benign breast lesions (1-6).
There is extensive literature regarding flow cytometrie DNA
analysis of invasive breast carcinoma, and there are several
reports of DNA analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ (5, 7-14).
We have previously reported the use of specimen mammogra-
phy-guided fine-needle aspiration of clinically occult lesions
within excised specimens for DNA analysis by flow cytometry
(15, 16).
This report analyzes a prospective pilot study that was
performed: (a) to determine the feasibility of flow cytometrie
DNA analysis of specimen mammography-guided FNAs2 of
clinically occult lesions detected during screening mammogra-
phy that proved to be benign after wire localization and cxci-
sion; (b) to explore associations with mammographie and path-
ological features of the benign lesions; (c) to explore the
frequency of aneuploidy in benign lesions; and (d) to assess any
subsequent short-term risk of development of breast carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study group consists of I 88 consecutive patients who
underwent biopsies of 189 clinically occult lesions detected by
screening mammography that showed benign pathology at path-
obogical exam. The median age of the patients in the study group
was 62 years (range, 31-85 years). Eighty-four (44%) of the
patients were less than 50 years old: 105 (56%) were 50 years or
older. Written informed consent was obtained.
Mammograms were obtained with a Senographe 600 1 or
DMR unit (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI)
using Min-R cassettes and Min-R film (Eastman Kodak, Roch-
ester, NY) at a cancer institute mammography center. Each of
the calcified lesions was imaged in vivo with accessory magni-
fication projections. Mammographically guided needle localiza-
tion procedures were performed using the method described by
Kopans et a!. (17). Radiography of the specimen was performed
using the compression and magnification technique (X 1.85) in
each ease with the clinical DMR mammography unit.
The surgical staff was notified immediately of the confir-
mation of the excision of lesions. After the removal of com-
pression, the mammographer performed a 20-gauge needle as-
2 The abbreviations used are: FNA. fine-needle aspirate; LCIS. lobular
carcinoma in situ.
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1544 Flow Cytometric DNA Analyses of Benign Breast Lesions
Table I Flow cytometric DNA analyses of specimen
mammography-guided FNAs of benign breast lesions
No. of lesions 189
No. of aneuploid lesions 14 (7%)
No. of dipboid lesions 175 (93%)
Median S-phase % 2.0Lower 33% S-phase % 1.6Higher 33% S-phase % 4.1
piration within the suspect mammographic lesion in the
operative specimen (16). Needle guidance techniques based on
the radiography of the specimen included: (a) the use of cir-
cumferential coordinates or surface landmarks on the specimen
for larger lesions; and (b) the insertion of a localizing needle and
repeat radiography of the uncompressed specimen for smaller
lesions. Fine-needle aspiration was performed throughout the
mammographically depicted lesion to provide adequate lesion
sampling. The needle aspirate was then sent for flow eytometric
DNA analysis. Exeisional biopsy specimens were sent to the
cancer institute department of pathology.
For I 14 consecutive benign lesions, a second needle was
used to aspirate adjacent normal breast tissue at least 2 cm from
the index lesion within the excised specimen under mammo-
graphic guidance. These samples also underwent flow cytomet-
nc DNA analysis.
The needle aspirates sent for flow cytometric DNA analy-
sis were dispersed by means of repeated aspiration through a
25-gauge needle and then fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at
-20#{176}C.For analysis, the cells were centrifuged, and the pellet
was stained with propidium iodide (50 p.g/ml) in Kristen buffer
[0. 1% sodium citrate, 0.02 mg/mI RNase A, and 0.37% NP4O
(pH 7.4)]. Samples of lysed whole blood from a healthy donor
and chick RBCs processed in identical fashion were also stained
and evaluated to verify the daily reproducible performance of
the cytometer. A minimum of 1000 cells from the needle aspi-
rates were analyzed on a FACSean flow cytometer (Becton
Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with a double t discriminator module
and an excitation beam at 488 nm. Data were collected for the
fluorescence 2 channel, measuring propidium iodide emission
through a 585/42 band-pass filter. Chick RBCs were added to
the samples as an internal standard. The photomultiplier tube
voltage for the fluorescence 2 channel was set so that the cells
in healthy donor blood peaked at channel 200. A threshold of 28
was set on this channel to eliminate cellular debris but include
RBCs. All samples were collected ungated.
Data were first analyzed with the Lysis II program (Beeton
Dickinson) to exclude doublets and debris. The resulting histo-
gram files were further analyzed with Multicycle (Phoenix Fbo
Systems, San Diego. CA). This program calculated the percent-
age of cells in the , 5, and 02 phases for each cycling cell
population present as well as the DNA index of the standard
(chick RBCs) and any aneuploid peak present compared with
that of the diploid peak. The DNA index is the ratio of the peak
0 1 channel of either the standard or the aneupboid cells:the peak
01 channel of dipboid cells. The BAD index and coefficient of
variation for the sample are a measure of the quality of the
sample staining. All specimens exhibited a BAD of less than
25% and a coefficient of variation of less than 6%. The DNA
Table 2 Comparison of DNA content of specimen mammography-
guided FNAs of benign breast lesions and adjacent normal tissue
No. of lesions (%)
DNA content
FNAsample F’ Aneuploid Diploid
Benign lesions 189 ( 100) 14 (7)” 175 (93)
Adjacent normal tissue I 14 (100) I (0.9Y’6 133 (99)
“ P = 0.01.
‘, Aneuploid normal tissue was adjacent to a diploid benign lesion.
index for the sample is a measure of the degree of aneuploidy in
the abnormal population. Without knowledge of mammographic
and pathological findings, coauthor C. C. S. performed all flow
cytometry and interpreted the results.
Cell populations with a DNA index of 1.0 ± 0. 1 (2 SDs)
were considered diploid. All others were considered to have
aneuploidy present. All needle aspirates, including those that
had aneupboid populations, had some dipboid cells present.
When aneupboid cells were present, the aneuploid S-phase per-
centage was used for S-phase percentage analysis rather than the
diploid cell population S-phase value. Cases were then desig-
nated as having either a low, intermediate, or high S-phase
percentage based on their placement within the 33% percentiles
determined for the study group.
Histological material derived from excisional biopsy was
stained with H&E stain. All pathological interpretations were
performed prospectively by the cancer institute department of
pathology staff without knowledge of the flow cytometrie find-
ings. Retrospective pathological review of benign lesions in
patients who subsequently developed ipsilateral breast earci-
noma was also performed. There was no evidence of malig-
nancy in the benign excisional biopsies during each pathological
review. Histological assessment of the entire biopsy specimen
was made with the knowledge of the presence and location of
the mammographie abnormality within the specimen, so that
specific anatomical correlation could be made in each ease. For
calcified lesions, the specimen was sliced and reradiographed to
aid localization during pathological examination.
Benign lesions were grouped into five pathological cate-
gories: (a) atypical hyperplasialLClS; (b) hyperplasia; (c) ad-
enosis; (d) intramammary lymph nodes; and (e) other benign
lesions. These pathological diagnosis categories were then com-
bined as proliferative (categories a-c) and nonproliferative (eat-
egories d and e). Prospective mammographic interpretations
were categorized by appearance: (a) soft tissue mass content or
with caleifications; or (b) mierocaleifleations only. Mammo-
graphic lesion extent was categorized as 1-10, 1 1-20, and
>20 mm.
Clinical follow-up to determine the subsequent develop-
ment of breast carcinoma after the initial benign biopsies was
performed by mammographie and clinical chart review. Statis-
tical analyses were performed with x2 and odds ratio analysis
( 18). Ps < 0.05 were considered significant. The odds ratio was
defined as the relative risk of carcinoma in patients with aneu-
ploid benign lesions relative to that in patients with diploid
benign lesions and was considered significant if the lower limit
of the 95% confidence interval was greater than 1.
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Clinical Cancer Research 1545
Table 3 Associations between clinical mammographic features and flow cytometric DNA analyses of benign lesions”
No. of lesions (%)
DNA analyses
n Aneuploid Diploid Low S-phase % High S-phase %
Patient age (yr)
�49 84(100) 8l0) 76(90) 30(36) 23(27)
�50 105(100) 6(6) 99(94) 34(32) 38(36)
Mammographic appearanceCalcification only 91 ( 100) 8 (9) 83 (91) 32 (35) 31 (34)
Soft tissue mass6 98 (100) 6 (6) 92 (94) 32 (33) 31 (32)Mammographic soft tissue only
lesion extent (mm)
1-10 16(100) 1 (6) 15(94) 3(19) 5(31)
1 1-20 47 ( 100) 2 (4) 45 (96) 16 (34) 14 (30)
>20 19(100) 0(0) 19100) 8(42) 7(37)
Mammographic calcification
lesion extent (mm)
1-10 56(100) 4(7) 52(93) 18(32) 19(34)
11-20 15(100) 213) 13(87) 6(40) 5(33)
>20 20(100) 2(10) 18(90) 8(40) 7(35)
a No significant associations were present.
bThis includes 15 soft tissue masses with calcifications.
Table 4 Associations between histological diagnoses of benign mammographic lesions and flow cytometric DNA analyses
No. of lesions (%)
DNA analyses
Histological diagnoses n Aneuploid Diploid Low_S-phase % High S-phase %
Atypia/LCIS 34(100) 4(12) 30(88) 12(35) 13(38)
Hyperplasia 31 (100) 1 (3) 30 (97) 1 1 (35) 7 (23)
Adcnosis 41 (100) 4(10) 37(90) 12(29) 19(46)
Intrammary lymph nodes 6(100) 2(33)” 4(67) 0(0) 0(0)
Other benign lesions 77 ( 100) 3 (4) 74 (96) 29 (38) 23 (30)
Proliferative” 106(100) 9(8) 97(92) 35(33) 40(38)
Nonproliferative’ 83 (100) 5 (6) 78 (94) 29 (35) 21 (25)
“ P = 0.014 comparing the aneupboid rate of intramammary lymph nodes with all other diagnoses.b Atypia/LCIS, hyperplasia, andC Intramammary lymph nodes and other benign lesions.
RESULTS
Flow cytometrie DNA analysis of specimen mammogra-
phy-guided FNAs was possible on 189 consecutive clinically
occult benign lesions that underwent excision prompted by
screening mammography. Fourteen of 189 (7%) benign lesions
contained ancuploidy. The median S-phase percentage of the
study group was 2.0; the lower 33rd percentile S-phase percent-
age was � 1.6, and the higher 33rd percentile S-phase percent-
age was �4.1 (Table 1).
DNA analysis of specimen mammography-guided FNAs in
adjacent normal mammographic tissue with benign histological
findings showed aneupboidy in only 1 of 1 14 (0.9%) eases
within the study. As shown in Table 2, the aneuploid rate in the
normal tissue control group was significantly lower than that of
the benign lesions (P = 0.01).
Associations between clinical and mammographic features
and DNA analyses of the benign lesions are shown in Table 3.
DNA content and S-phase percentage showed no significant
associations with patient age, mammographie appearance, and
mammographic soft tissue or calcification extent.
Associations between histological diagnoses and DNA
analyses of the benign lesions are shown in Table 4. Benign
histological diagnoses included nonproliferative benign lesions
(77 lesions, 41%), benign intramammary lymph nodes (6 Ic-
sions, 3%), the proliferative changes of adenosis (41 lesions,
22%), and lesions containing hyperplasia (31 lesions, 16%) or
atypia or LCIS (34 lesions, 18%). Aneuploidy was detected in
all categories of benign lesions. The aneupboid rate for benign
intramammary lymph nodes (2 of 6 lesions, 33%) was greater
than the aneupboid rate of all other benign diagnoses combined
(12 of 183 lesions, 6.5%; P = 0.01). There was no significant
association between aneupboid rates and the combined prolifer-
ative histological diagnoses as compared with the nonprolifera-
tive diagnoses. There was no significant association between
high and low S-phase percentage and benign histological diag-
noses.
The risk of development of subsequent breast carcinoma in
patients with aneuploid and diploid benign lesions is shown in
Table 5. During a median follow-up of 40 months (range. 6-84
months), 2 of 13 (15%) patients with aneupboid benign lesions
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1546 Flow Cytometric DNA Analyses of Benign Breast Lesions
Table 5 Subsequent risk of developme nt of ipsilateral breas t carcinoma in p atients with aneupboid and diplo id benign lesions
Clinical and_mammographic_outcome”
No. of patients (%)
Aneupboid Dipboid Low S-phase % High S-phase %
Carcinoma 2(15)” 5(3)” 2(3) 4(7)
No carcinoma I 1 (85)’ 170 (97) 62 (97) 57 (93)
Totals 13 ( 100) 175 (100) 64 (100) 61 (100)“ Median follow-up was 40 months (range. 6-84 months).
6 Odds ratio = 6.18 (95% confidence interval. 1.08-35.56). The odds ratio was defined as the relative risk of carcinoma in patients with
aneupboid benign lesions relative to that of patients with dipboid benign lesions.
‘ Biopsy of a second new microcalcification cluster in one case was benign with atypia and aneuploidy.
developed ipsilateral breast carcinoma. One patient developed a
new mammographic lesion showing duetal carcinoma in situ,
and another patient developed a mammographie lesion showing
infiltrating lobular carcinoma in different quadrants of the same
breast as the index benign biopsies within 8 and 34 months,
respectively. In comparison, 5 of 175 (3%) patients with diploid
benign lesions developed ipsilatcral breast carcinomas. The
calculated odds ratio was 6.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-
35.56). No patients developed contralateral breast carcinoma
during the period of the study. One patient with an initial
aneupboid benign lesion did not develop carcinoma but under-
went a subsequent biopsy of benign calcification that contained
atypia and aneuploidy.
DISCUSSION
During this study, DNA flow cytometry was successfully
performed on 189 consecutive specimen mammography-guided
FNAs of clinically occult lesions detected by screening mam-
mography that proved to be benign at histological examination.
Aneuploid DNA content was detected in 7% of the benign
lesions, most commonly in benign intramammary lymph nodes,
but also in benign atypical and hyperplastic lesions, adenosis,
and other nonproliferative benign lesions. The observation that,
in comparison, aneupboidy was detected in only 1 % of FNAs of
adjacent normal tissue (P < 0.01) shows that the detection of
aneuploidy was not a laboratory artifact.
There are little data in the literature regarding DNA flow
cytometry of benign breast lesions (1-6). To our knowledge,
this is the largest series of DNA flow cytometry of benign breast
lesions. The relative lack of aneupboidy in the normal adjacent
breast tissue controls suggests some biological significance of
aneuploidy in benign breast lesions. Whether aneuploidy pre-
dates or is an obligate precursor of light microscopic malig-
nancy is unresolved. Our S-phase percentage data show a wide
range of proliferative activity for benign breast lesions that is
independent of the specific histological diagnoses.
To our knowledge, this is the first study showing the risk of
subsequent development of ipsilateral breast carcinoma in pa-
tients who underwent benign breast biopsies with aneuploidy as
compared to patients who underwent benign breast biopsies
with diploid DNA content. There is one anecdotal report of a
patient who developed ipsilaterab breast cancer 2.5 years after a
benign biopsy showing atypia and ancupboidy (1), but the rela-
tionship of these occurrences and the importance of this isolated
report were uncertain. The patients in our study with aneuploid
benign lesions who have not yet developed malignancy may
represent patients whose potential malignancy was completely
removed by the excisional biopsy or whose follow-up is not yet
long enough. Due to the small numbers and short follow-up in
our pilot study, a study of a larger number and longer follow-up
of patients with benign breast biopsies would be necessary to
validate the risk prediction of aneuploid DNA content for the
subsequent development of ipsilateral breast carcinoma. Deter-
mination of whether the risk associated with aneuploidy in
benign biopsies is ipsilateral or bilateral would also be of
potential clinical significance.
In light of the increasing interest in breast cancer risk
assessment, partially attributed to recent breakthroughs in ge-
netie testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (19), there is an
increasing need for intermediate risk markers for the develop-
ment of breast carcinomas, i.e. , markers that would predict the
development of breast carcinoma within 5-10 years rather than
over a lifetime. A study of in vivo FNAs of normal breast tissue
in high- and low-risk women was performed by Fabian et a!.
(20), who performed eight clinically guided fine-needle aspira-
tions/breast. They evaluated the aspirates for overexpression of
estrogen receptor, epidermal growth factor, mutant p53, and
HER-2!neu by immunocytochemistry and for aneuploidy by
image analysis. With their technique and the criteria for ancu-
ploidy, aneupboidy was detected in 32% of high-risk women as
compared with 0% of low-risk women.
With the increasing numbers of benign breast biopsies
performed as a result of screening mammography, the in vitro
specimen mammography-guided fine-needle aspiration tech-
nique is a practical clinical research method that provides mam-
mographic lesion-specific fresh cell samples immediately after
wire localization and excision. Fresh cell samples are preferred
by both our flow cytometry and molecular genetic laboratories
and others (21-23). Core biopsy washings retrieved during
stereotactie core breast biopsies of clinically occult lesions
detected by mammography have also been reported as a source
of fresh cellular material for flow eytometry (24). FNAs and
scrapings of palpable breast carcinoma have also been used for
flow cytometry (4-6, 25), but these techniques are limited to
larger tumors only and exclude smaller clinically occult lesions
detected by screening mammography. We are now performing
combined staining with fluorescein-labeled anticytokeratin an-
tibodies that allows the DNA analysis of epithelial cells to be
separated from that of other elements. The development of
multiple marker immunophenotyping panels by flow cytometry
in breast disease has potential use in risk assessment in cells
obtained from normal breast tissue or benign lesions using
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Clinical Cancer Research 1547
fine-needle aspiration, because multiple tests can be performed
simultaneously on the same low number of cells.
In conclusion, DNA flow cytometry can be performed
successfully on specimen mammography-guided FNAs of mam-
mography-detected lesions that prove to be benign at biopsy.
Our pilot study data suggest that aneuploidy, which is seen in a
variety of benign breast lesions, is associated with a higher
short-term risk of development of ipsilaterab breast carcinoma
than benign lesions with diploidy. The combined techniques of
specimen mammography-guided FNA and flow cytometry pro-
vide a practical translational research method for the further
study and molecular and genetic risk assessment of benign
breast disease.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge Karin Brady for invaluable assistance
in data management and preparation of this manuscript and Les Blu-
menson for statistical analysis.
REFERENCES
1. Izuo, M., Okagaki, I., Richart, R. M., and Lattes, R. DNA content in
“apocrine metaplasia” of fibrocystie disease of the breast. Cancer
(Phila.), 27: 643-650. 1971.
2. Carpenter, R., Gibbs, N., Matthews, J., and Cooke, I. Importance ofcellular DNA content in pre-malignant breast disease and pre-invasivecarcinoma of the female breast. Br. J. Surg., 74: 905-906, 1987.
3. Christov, K., Milev, A., and Todorov, V. DNA aneuploidy and cell
proliferation in breast tumors. Cancer (Phila.), 64: 673-679, 1989.
4. Martelli, 0., Daidone, M. 0., Mastore, M., Gabrielli, G. M., Galante,
E., Pilotti, S., and Silvestrini, R. Combined analysis of pboidy and cellkinetics on fine-needle aspirates from breast tumors. Cancer (Phila.). 71:
2522-2527, 1993.
5. Ottescn, 0. L., Christensen, I. J., Larsen, J. K., Christiansen, J.,
Hansen, B., and Andersen, J. A. DNA analysis of in situ ductal carci-
noma of the breast via flow eytometry. Cytometry, 22: 168-176, 1995.
6. Cornacehiari, A., Grigolato, P. G., Faechetti, F., Morassi, M. L.,Cadei, M., Alpi, F., Battocehio. S., and Chirico, E. Usefulness of thescraping method for DNA flow cytometry in breast tumors. Cytometry.
19: 263-266, 1995.
7. Hedley, D. W., Clark, 0. M., Cornelisse, C. J., Killander, D., Kutc,T., and Merkel, D. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNAcytometry in carcinoma of the breast. Cytometry, 14: 482-485, 1993.
8. Clark, 0. M. in: J. R. Harris, M. E. Lippman, M. Morrow, and S.Hellman (eds.), Prognostic and Predictive Factors, Diseases of theBreast, pp. 461-471. Philadelphia: Lippineott-Raven Publishers, 1996.
9. Clark, 0. M., Dressier, L. G., Owens, M. A., Pounds, G., Oldaker, T.,and MeGuire, W. L. Prediction of relapse or survival in patients withnode-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. N. Engl. J. Med.,320: 627-633, 1989.
10. Ferno, M., and Baldetorp, B. Flow cytometrie DNA index andS-phase fraction in breast cancer in relation to other prognostic variablesand clinical outcome. Acta Oncol., 31: 157-165, 1992.
I 1. Beerman, H., and Kluin, M. Prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy
in a series of 690 primary breast cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer, 64:
139-143, 1991.
12. Ottesen, 0. L., Christensen, I. J., Larsen, J. K., Kerndrup. G. B.,Hansen, B., and Andersen, J. A. DNA ancuploidy in early breast cancer.Br. J. Cancer, 72: 832-839, 1995.
13. Killcen, J. L., and Namiki, H. DNA analysis ofductal carcinoma in
situ of the breast. Cancer (Phila.), 68: 2602-2607, 1991.
14. Pallis, L., Skoog, L., Falkmer, U., Wilking. N.. Rutquist. L. E.,
Auer. 0., and Cedermark, B. The DNA profile of breast cancer in sill,.
Eur. J. Surg. Oneol., 18: 108-1 1 1, 1992.
15. Stomper, P. C., Nava, M. E. R., Budnick, R. M., and Stewart, C. C.
Specimen mammography-guided fine-needle aspiration of clinically
occult benign and malignant lesions: analysis of cell type and number.
Investig. Radiol., 32: 277-281, 1997.
16. Stomper, P. C.. Stewart, C. C., Penetrante, R. B.. Nava, M. E. R.,
and Tsangaris, T. N. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of excised breastlesions: use of fresh tissue needle aspirates obtained under guidance
with mammography of the specimen. Radiology, 185: 415-422. 1992.
17. Kopans, D. B., Lindfors, K. K., McCarthy, K. A.. and Meyer. J. E.
Spring hookwirc breast lesion localizer: use with rigid-compressionmammographic systems. Radiology, 157: 537-538, 1985.
18. Fleiss, J. L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, pp.
20-27. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
19. Struewing. J. P., Hartge. P.. Wacholder, S.. Baker, S. M.. Berlin, M..
McAdams, M., Timmerman, M. M., Brody, L. C.. and Tucker, M. A. The
risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2among Ashkenazi Jews. N. Engl. J. Med., 336: 1448-1449, 1997.
20. Fabian, C. J., Zalles, C., Kamel, S., McKittrick, R., Moore, W. P.,
Zeiger, S., Simon, C., Kimler, B., Cramer, A., Garcia, F., and Jewell, W.Biomarker and cytologic abnormalities in women at high and low risk
for breast cancer. J. Cell. Biochem.. 17G: 153-160, 1993.
21. Hedley, D. W., Friedlander, M. L., and Taylor, I. W. Application ofDNA flow eytomctry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the
study of aneupboidy and its clinical significance. Cytometty. 6: 327-
333, 1985.
22. Kallioniemi, 0. P. Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embeddedtissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of
intratumor heterogeneity. Cytometry, 9: 164-169, 1988.
23. Kute, I. E., Gregory, B., Gallcshaw, J., Hopkins, M., Buss, D., and
Case, D. How reproducible are flow cytometry data from paraffin-embedded blocks? Cytometry, 9: 494-498, 1988.
24. Stomper, P. C., Budnick, R. M., and Stewart, C. C. Breast ster-eotactic core biopsy needle washings: abundant cell samples from
clinically occult lesions for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Investig.
Radiol., 33. 51-55, 1998.
25. Lykkesfeldt, A. E., Balslev, I., Christensen, I. J., Larsen, J. K.,
Molgaard, H., Rasmussen, B. B.. Thorpe, S.. and Rose, C. DNA ploidy
and S phase fraction in primary breast carcinomas in relation to prog-nostie factors and survival for premcnopausal patients at high risk for
recurrent disease. Aeta Oncol., 27: 749-756, 1988.
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1998;4:1543-1547. Clin Cancer Res P C Stomper, J R DeBloom, 2nd, R M Budnick, et al. detected by screening mammography.Flow cytometric DNA analyses of benign breast lesions
Updated version
http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/6/1543
Access the most recent version of this article at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/6/1543To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
Research. on November 28, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from