fluid dynamics
DESCRIPTION
Fluid Dynamics describes the physics of fluids at level of Undergraduate in science (physics, math, engineering). For comments or improvements please contact [email protected]. Thanks. For more presentations on different subjects visit my website at http://www.solohermelin.com.TRANSCRIPT
SOLO FLUID DYNAMICS
Table of Content
Mathematical NotationsBasic Laws in Fluid Dynamics
1. Conservation of Mass (C.M.)
2. Conservation of Linear Momentum (C.L.M.)
3. Conservation of Moment-of- Momentum (C.M.M.)
4. Conservation of Energy (C.E.), The First Law of Thermodynamics
5. The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Entropy Production
6. Constitutive Relations for Gases
Newtonian Fluid Definitions – Navier–Stokes Equations
State Equation
Thermally Perfect Gas and Calorically Perfect Gas
Boundary Conditions
Dimensionless EquationsMach Number – Flow Regimes
Boundary Layer and Reynolds Number
SOLO FLUID DYNAMICS
Table of Content (continue – 1)Steady Quasi One-Dimensional Flow
Shock and Expansion Waves
Normal Shock Waves
Flow Description
Streamlines, Streaklines, and Pathlines
Circulation
Biot-Savart Formula
Helmholtz Vortex Theorems
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational FlowBlasius TheoremKutta Condition
Kutta-Joukovsky Theorem
Joukovsky Airfoils
Shock Wave Definition
Oblique Shock Wave Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves
SOLO FLUID DYNAMICS
Table of Content (continue – 2)
Linearized Flow Equations
Cylindrical Coordinates
Small Perturbation Flow
Applications: Three Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (d) and Lift (l) per Unit Span Computations for Subsonic Flow (M∞ < 1) Prandtl-Glauert Compressibility Correction
Computations for Supersonic Flow (M∞ >1) Ackeret Compressibility Correction
References
5
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.1 VECTOR
1.2 SCALAR PRODUCT
1.3 VECTOR PRODUCT
u kk 1 2 3, , u u e u e u e 1 1 2 2 3 3
u v u v u v u v 1 1 2 2 3 3 u v kk k 1 2 3, ,
u v
u u
u u
u u
v
v
v
0
0
0
3 2
3 1
2 1
1
2
3
ji
permutjiodd
permutjieven
CevittaLevi
vu
ij
jiij
0
.,
.,1
SOLO
6
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.5 ROTOR OF A VECTOR
1.4 DIVERGENCE OF A VECTOR
1.6 GRADIENT OF A SCALAR
u
u
x
u
x
u
x
1
1
2
2
3
3 i
i
x
u
uu
x
u
xe
u
x
u
xe
u
x
u
xe
3
2
2
31
1
3
3
12
1
2
2
13
u u
uu u
2
2
u
x
u
xi
k
k
i
i
kj
k
ii x
uu
x
uu
xe
xe
xe
x x x
11
22
313
1 2 3
xk
SOLO
7
FLUID DYNAMICS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.7 GRADIENT OF A VECTOR
u u e u e u e1 1 2 2 3 3
u
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
2
3
3
u
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
Dik
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
ik
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
0
0
0
2
1
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
3
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
u
xi
k
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
xi
k
i
k
k
i
i
k
k
i
1
2
1
2
Du
x
u
xiki
k
k
i
1
2
iki
k
k
i
u
x
u
x
1
2
SOLO
8
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.8 GAUSS’ THEOREMS
d s
A
V
A analytic in V
A C C const vector .
S V
dvsdGAUSS
2 analytic in V S k
k
V
dvs
ds
SOLO
Johann Carl Friederich Gauss 1777-1855
S V
dvAsdAGAUSS
1
S k
k
kk
V
dvx
AdsA
9
FLUID DYNAMICS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.8 GAUSS’ THEOREMS (CONTINUE)
S V
dvAsdAGAUSS
3
A A dv
,A
analytic in V
A dsA
xdv
Vk k
k
kS
V k
k
kk x
A
xA
B e e e 1 1 2 2 3 3
S V
dvABBAsdABGAUSS
4 B A ds AB
xB
A
xdv
Vi k k k
i
k
ik
kS
A analytic in V
S VdvAAsdGAUSS
5 ds A ds A
A
x
A
xdv
Vi j j i
j
i
i
jS
SOLO
10
FLUID DYNAMICS
d s
A
C
d rS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.9 STOCKES’ THEOREM
A d r A d s
C S
A analytic on S
A d rA
x
A
xd si i
C
j
i
i
j
k
S
Gauss’ and Stokes’ Theorems are generalizations of theFundamental Theorem Of CALCULUS
A b A a
d A x
d xd x
a
b
( ) ( )
George Stokes 1819-1903
SOLO
11
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
MATERIAL DERIVATIVES (M.D.)
1e
2e
3e
r
u
b
rd d F r tF
tdt dr F
,
d
dtF r t
F
t
dr
d tF
,
d
dtF r t
F
tb F
b
,
for any dr d F r t
F
tdt d r
F
xi ki
ki
k
,
d
d tF r t
F
t
d r
d t
F
xi ki k i
k
,
d
d tF r t
F
tb
F
xb
i ki
ki
k
,
vectoranybbtdrd
Joseph-Louis Lagrange
1736-1813 Leonhard Euler
1707-1783
SOLO
FIXED IN SPACE(CONSTANT VOLUME)
EULER
LAGRANGE
MOVING WITH THE FLUID(CONSTANT MASS)
1e
3e
2e
u
12
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
MATERIAL DERIVATIVES (CONTINUE)
Fut
FF
tD
DtrF
td
d
u
,
k
ik
iki
u x
Fu
t
FF
tD
DtrF
td
d
,velocityfluiduutd
rdIf
Material Derivatives = Derivative Along A Fluid Path (Streamline)
D
D tu
u
tu u
u
t
uu u
2
2
1e
2e
3e
r
u duu
dr
AccelerationOf The Fluid
k
ik
i
jj
ji
i
k
ik
ii
x
uu
x
uu
uxt
u
x
uu
t
uu
tD
D
2
2
1
SOLO
13
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1.10 MATERIAL DERIVATIVES (CONTINUE)
d uu
tdt dr u
d uu
tdt d x
u
xii
ki
k
rdrdDtdt
u
xd
xd
xd
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
t
u
t
u
t
u
ud
ud
ud
ikik
3
2
1
3
3
2
3
1
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1 d u
u
td t
u
x
u
xd x
u
x
u
xd x
ii
Translation
i
k
k
i
Dilation
k
i
k
k
i
Rotation
k
1
2
1
2
Dilationrduu
rdurdu
urdrdurdu
rdurdurdD
T
u
u
ik
2
12
1
2
12
1
2
12
1
ik dr u dr Rotation
1
2
SOLO
14
REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM
v (t)
S(t)
SflowV ,
sd
OSV ,
OSOflowSflow VVV ,,,
OSr ,
md OSV ,
OflowV ,
Or,
-any system of coordinatesOxyz
- any continuous and differentiable functions in
trtr OO ,,, ,,
tandrO,
trO ,,
- flow density at point
and time tOr,
SOLO
- mass flow through the element .mdsdV S , sd
- any control volume, changing shape, bounded by a closed surface S(t)v (t)
- flow velocity, relative to O, at point and time t trV OOflow ,,,
Or,
- position and velocity, relative to O, of an element of surface, part of the control surface S(t).
OSOS Vr ,, ,
- area of the opening i, in the control surface S(t).iopenS
- gradient operator in O frame.O,
- flow relative to the opening i, in the control surface S(t).OSiOflowSi VVV ,,,
- differential of any vector , in O frame.O
td
d
FLUID DYNAMICS
15
Start with LEIBNIZ THEOREM from CALCULUS:
ChangeBoundariesthetodueChange
tb
ta
tb
ta td
tadttaf
td
tbdttbfdx
t
txfdxtxf
td
dLEIBNITZ
)),(()),((
),(),(::
)(
)(
)(
)(
and generalized it for a 3 dimensional vector space on a volume v(t) bounded by thesurface S(t).
Using LEIBNIZ THEOREM followed by GAUSS THEOREM (GAUSS 4):
tv
OSOOOSGAUSS
OpotolativedsofMovement
thetodueChage
tSOS
tvO
LEIBNITZ
Otv
vdVVt
GAUSSsdVvd
tvd
td
d,,,,)4(
intRe
)(,
This is REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM
OSBORNEREYNOLDS
1842-1912
SOLO
GOTTFRIED WILHELMvon LEIBNIZ
1646-1716
REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM
v (t)
S(t)
SflowV ,
sd
OSV ,
OSOflowSflow VVV ,,,
OSr ,
md OSV ,
OflowV ,
Or,
FLUID DYNAMICS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
16
FLUID DYNAMICS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
)(,,,,)4(
,)()()(
tvOSOOOS
OGAUSS
OStStv
O
LEIBNITZ
Otv
vdVVt
GAUSS
sdVvdt
vdtd
d
)(
,
,)4(
,)()()(
tv k
kOS
i
k
i
kOSi
GAUSS
kkOStS
itv
iLEIBNITZ
tvi
vdx
V
xV
t
GAUSS
sdVvdt
vdtd
d
SOLO
v (t)
S(t)
SflowV ,
sd
OSV ,
OSOflowSflow VVV ,,,
OSr ,
md OSV ,
OflowV ,
Or,
17
FLUID DYNAMICS
1 .MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
O
OOS td
RduV
,,
CASE 1 (CONTROL VOLUME vF ATTACHED TO THE FLUID)
kkOS uV ,
)(,,,)4(
,)()()(
tvOOO
OGAUSS
OtStv
OOtv
F
FFF
vduut
GAUSS
sduvdt
vdtd
d
)()4(
)()()(
tv k
kI
k
Ik
I
GAUSS
kKtS
Itv
I
tvI
F
FFF
vdx
u
xu
t
GAUSS
sduvdt
vdtd
d
SOLO
vF (t)
SF(t)
sd
OSV ,
0,,, OSOflowS VVV
OSR ,
OR,
md
OSV ,
OflowV ,
18
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
1&, kkOS uV1&, uV OS
CASE 2 (CONTROL VOLUME vF ATTACHED TO THE FLUID AND )1
)(
,,)(
,)(
)(
tvOO
tSO
tv
F
FFF
vdusduvdtd
d
td
tvd )()()(
)(
tv k
kk
tSk
tv
F
FFF
dvx
udsudv
td
d
td
tvd
td
tvd
tvu F
Ftv
OOF
)(
)(
1lim
0)(,,
td
tvd
tvx
u F
Ftv
k
k
F
)(
)(
1lim
0)(
EULER 1755
SOLO
vF (t)
SF(t)
sd
OSV ,
0,,, OSOflowS VVV
OSR ,
OR,
md
OSV ,
OflowV ,
19
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
CASE 3 (CONTROL VOLUME vF ATTACHED TO THE FLUID AND )
&, kkOS uV &, uV OS
or, since this is true for any attached volume vF(t)
)(,,
)(,
)( )(
)(0
tvOO
tSO
tv tv
F
FF F
vdut
sduvdt
vdtd
d
td
tmd
)(
)()( )(
)(0
tvk
k
tSkk
tv tv
F
FF F
vduxt
sduvdt
dvtd
d
td
tmd
Because the Control Volume vF is attached to the fluid and they are not sources or sinks, the mass is constant.
OOOOOO uut
ut ,,,,,,0
k
k
k
k
k x
u
xu
tu
xt
0
SOLO
vF (t)
SF(t)
sd
OSV ,
0,,, OSOflowS VVV
OSR ,
OR,
md
OSV ,
OflowV ,
20
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
CASE 4 (CONTROL VOLUME WITH FIXED SHAPE C.V. )0,
OSV
Define
.... VC
OOVC
vdt
vdtd
d
.... VC
i
VCi vd
tvd
td
d
r t r t r t, , , i k k i kx t x t x t, , ,
)(,
)()(
tSOS
tvOO
tv
sdV
vdtt
vdtd
d
ktS
kOSi
tvi
i
tvi
sdV
vdtt
vdtd
d
FF
)(,
)()(
We have
but
OOOO ut
ut ,,,, 0
k
k
iik
k
uxt
uxt
0
CASE 5 r t r t r t, , ,
SOLO
21
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
We have
)(
,,)(
4
.
)(,
)(,,,,,,
)(,
)(,,
)(
tSOOS
tvO
MDG
DerMatGAUSS
tSOS
tvOOOOOO
O
tSOS
tvOO
OOtv
sduVvdtD
D
sdV
vduuut
sdV
vdut
vdtd
d
)(
,)(
4
.
)(,
)(
)(,
)()(
tSkkkOSi
tv
iMDG
DerMatGAUSS
tSkkOSi
tv k
ki
k
ik
k
ik
i
tSkkOSi
tv k
ki
i
tvi
sduVvdtD
D
sdV
vdx
u
xu
xu
t
sdV
vdx
u
tvd
td
d
CASE 5 r t r t r t, , ,
SOLO
v (t)
S(t)
SflowV ,
sd
OSV ,
OSOflowSflow VVV ,,,
OSr ,
md OSV ,
OflowV ,
Or,
22
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
REYNOLDS 1
)(,,
)(
)(
tSOOS
tvO
Otv
sduVvdtD
D
vdtd
d
)(,
)(
)(
tSkkkOSi
tv
i
tvi
sduVvdtD
D
dvtd
d
REYNOLDS 2
)(
)(,,
)(
tvO
tSOSO
Otv
vdtD
D
sdVuvdtd
d
)(
)(,
)(
tv
i
tSkkOSki
tvi
vdtD
D
sdVuvdtd
d
CASE 5 r t r t r t, , ,
SOLO
v (t)
S(t)
SflowV ,
sd
OSV ,
OSOflowSflow VVV ,,,
OSr ,
md OSV ,
OflowV ,
Or,
23
FLUID DYNAMICS
1. MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS (CONTINUE)
1.11 REYNOLDS’ TRANSPORT THEOREM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
REYNOLDS 3
CASE 1 (CONTROL VOLUME ATTACHED TO THE FLUID vF(t) )
kkOS uV ,
)()( tv
OOtv FF
vdtD
Dvd
td
d
)()( tv
i
tvi
FF
vdtD
Dvd
td
d
SOLO
O
OOS td
RduV
,,
r t r t r t, , ,
vF (t)
SF(t)
sd
OSV ,
0,,, OSOflowS VVV
OSR ,
OR,
md
OSV ,
OflowV ,
CASE 4 (CONTROL VOLUME WITH FIXED SHAPE C.V. )0,
OSV
REYNOLDS 4
..,
..
..
SCO
OVC
VCO
sduvdtd
d
vdtD
D
....
..
SCkki
VCi
VC
i
sduvdtd
d
vdtD
D
Return to Table of Content
24
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
THE FLUID DYNAMICS IS DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING FOUR LAWS:
(1) CONSERVATION OF MASS (C.M.)
(2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.)
(4) THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
(5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
SOLO
(3) CONSERVATION OF MOMENT-OF-MOMENTUM (C.M.M.)
FLUID DYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
(6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
25
Casing
Control Volumes & Surfacesfor a Turbomachine
TurbomachineAxis
FixedControl Volume
C.V.
FixedControl Surface
C.S.
1V
2V
1r
2r
Inlet
Outlet
Rotor
1V
2V
1r
2r
Inlet
Outlet
Rotor r
1 2
x
y
z
r
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
)1 (CONSERVATION OF MASS (C.M.)
SOLO
The mass in the Fixed Control Volume (C.V.)is given by:
..VC
CV vdm
Since the mass entering the C.V. is equal to massexiting C.V., using Reynolds’ Transport Theoremwith η = 1, we have:
..
,
Re
..
0SC
md
S
ynolds
VCmd
CV sdVvdtd
d
td
md
Assume: - one inlet (1) of area A1 and mean fluid velocity V,S1 (relative to A1 )and density ρ1.
- one outlet (2) of area A2 and mean fluid velocity V,S2 (relative to A2 ) and density ρ2.
we have: 022,21,1,,.. 21
AVAVsdVsdVsdV SnSnA
SA
SSC
- mass flow rate entering the system through the element of C.S.
mdsdV S , sd
or: 21
22,211,1
flowflow Q
Sn
Q
Sn AVAV
where: - mass flow velocity exiting the system relative to the element of C.S. SSflow VV ,,
sd
FLUID DYNAMICS
26
SOLO
1 2 30 4 5 6
SUPERSONICCOMPRESSION
SUBSONICCOMPRESSION
COMBUSTIONFUEL
INJECTION EXPANSION
NOZZLECOMBUSTIONCHAMBER
DIFFUSER
FLAMEHOLDERS
EXHAUSTJET
0V
0A
fm
(1) CONSERVATION OF MASS (C.M.)
2221110000 AuAuAum
6665554443330 AuAuAuAumm f
DiffuserEnteringRateFlowMassAirm 0
RateFlowMassFuelm f 6,5,4,3,2,1,0,,,,,, 6543210 StationsatDensityGas
6,5,4,3,2,1,0,,,,,, 6543210 StationsatVelocityGasuuuuuuu
6,5,4,3,2,1,0,,,,,, 6543210 StationsatAreaAAAAAAA
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICSFLUID DYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
27
rjV
Pelton Water Wheel(Impulse Turbine)
j
rV j R
R
Control Volume
rV j
r
2V(Velocity of jet
leaving theControl Volume)
tR
r
j
2V
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.)
SOLO
..
:VC
CCV vdRRm
Using the Reynolds’ Transport Theorem we obtain
The Centroid of the mass enclosed by C.V. isCR
The Linear Moment of the mass enclosed by C.V. is defined as
....
,:VC
IVC
ICV vdtD
RDvdVP
..,
..,
..,
..,
....
SCS
m
SCSC
V
I
CCV
SCS
I
CCV
SCS
VC
REYNOLDS
VCI
CV
sdVRsdVRtd
RdmsdVRRm
td
d
sdVRvdRtd
dvd
tD
RDP
CV
C
..
,SC
SCCCVCV sdVRRVmP
or
The Linear Momentum, of the differential mass dm = ρdv is defined as
vdVmdVPd II ,,:
FLUID DYNAMICS
28
rjV
Pelton Water Wheel(Impulse Turbine)
j
rV j R
R
Control Volume
rV j
r
2V(Velocity of jet
leaving theControl Volume)
tR
r
j
2V
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.) (CONTINUE - 1)
SOLO
Using Newton’s Second Law, for the mass element dm = ρdv, we obtain:
extfd
- Differential external forces acting on dm
ijfd int
- Differential internal forces acting on dm
I
I td
RdVV
,: - Velocity of the mass element dm relative to I.
- mass flow rate entering the system through the element of C.S.
mdsdV S , sd
vdtD
VDmd
tD
VDfdfd
II
ext int
VVt
V
tD
VDI
II
,
- Material derivative of the Velocity of the mass element dm relative to I.V
- Velocity of mass exiting the system, relative to the element of C.S.
SV,
sd
FLUID DYNAMICS
29
rjV
Pelton Water Wheel(Impulse Turbine)
j
rV j R
R
Control Volume
rV j
r
2V(Velocity of jet
leaving theControl Volume)
tR
r
j
2V
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.) (CONTINUE - 2)
SOLO
Let integrate the equation
vdtD
VDmd
tD
VDfdfd
II
ext int
over the mass enclosed by C.V.
From the 3rd Newton’s Law the internal forces that particle j applies on particle i is of equal magnitude but of opposite direction to the force that particle i applies on particle j, therefore :
..
0
..int
.. VCI
VCVCext vd
tD
VDfdfd
Using Reynolds’ Transport Theorem we obtain
..
,..
,......
,SC
S
I
CV
SCS
IVC
REYNOLDS
VCI
VCextCVext sdVV
td
PdsdVVvdV
td
dvd
tD
VDfdF
FLUID DYNAMICS
30
extj
jSC
sdTsdVCSC
md
S
I
CV
SCmd
S
IVC
REYNOLDS
VCI
FFdstfnpvdgsdVVtd
PdsdVVvdV
td
dvd
tD
VD
�......
,..
,....
11
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
)2 (CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.) (CONTINUE - 3)
SOLO
The external forces acting on the system are:
• Gravitation acceleration (E center of Earth).E
E
RR
MGg
3
dstfnpsdTsdnsd��
111
where:
ndsnnsdsd
111 - vector of surface differential 2/ mN p - pressure on (normal to) the surface .
jj
SCsdTsd
VCVCextext FdstfnpvdgfdF
�......
11
f - friction force per (parallel to) unit surface . 2/ mN• Discrete force exerting by the surrounding on the point , and discrete moments .
jjF
jR
kkM
nT�
1 - force per unit surface 2/ mN
Therefore:
• Surface forces acting on the system:
npp
1t
1
n
1V
ds
wx1
wy1
wz1
tf
1
Pressure force
Friction force
WS
FLUID DYNAMICS
31
FLUID DYNAMICS
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATIONC.L.M.-2
Since this is true for all volumes vF(t) attached to the fluid we can drop the volume integral.
~~
~~
2
1
,,,
,
2
,
,
.).(
Ip
pGG
uuut
u
uut
u
tD
uD
III
II
I
I
I
DM
I
ikikik
i
ik
ii
i
iki
k
ik
i
jjjj
i
i
k
ik
iDM
i
p
xx
pG
xG
x
uu
x
uuuu
xt
u
x
uu
t
u
tD
uD
2
1
.).(
SOLO
Derivation From Integral Form (Continue)
)(,
)()()(
,
~
~
tvI
tStvtvI
I
F
FFF
vdG
sdvdGvdtD
uD
)(
)()()(
tv i
iki
tS
kik
tv
i
tv
i
F
FFF
vdx
G
sdvdGvdtD
uD
32
rjV
Pelton Water Wheel(Impulse Turbine)
j
rV j R
R
Control Volume
rV j
r
2V(Velocity of jet
leaving theControl Volume)
tR
r
j
2V
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
)2 (CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.)
SOLO
Let compute the C.L.M. in the tangential to the wheel direction, for the Pelton Water Wheel
ttvtv
extjj RfdfdrVrQVQ
0
int
0
coswhere
outin AS
AS sdVsdVQ
,,:
cos1 rVQR jt
Therefore
The average Torque on the water wheel is cos1 rVrQrRTorque jt
The Power developed is cos1 rVrQrRTorquePower jt
The average Tangential Reaction Force on the bucket is
In steady-state the directions and magnitudes of flows are fixed, therefore
0..
I
VCI
CV vdVtd
d
td
Pd
extj
jSCVC
SCmd
S
I
CV
SCmd
S
IVC
FFsdvdg
sdVVtd
PdsdVVvdV
td
d
�
....
..,
..,
..
Example
FLUID DYNAMICS
33
Ramjet
SOLO
(2) CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.)
WW AA
x sdxsdxpApumApumF ~1100006666
WW A
WA
A
WA AdAdpApuApu sinsin0020066
266
60602006
266 AppAuAu
60 Ap
WA
WA Adpp sin0 WA
WAdp sin0
0
600 sin
AAAdp
WA
W600 sin ApAdp
WA
W
WA
WA Ad sin
1 2 30 4 5 6
SUPERSONICCOMPRESSION
SUBSONICCOMPRESSION
COMBUSTIONFUEL
INJECTION EXPANSION
NOZZLECOMBUSTIONCHAMBER
DIFFUSER
FLAMEHOLDERS
EXHAUSTJET
0V
0A
fm
x
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
FLUID DYNAMICS
34
Ramjet
SOLO
CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM (C.L.M.) (continue – 1)
DRAGFRICTION
A
WA
DRAGPRESURE
A
WA
THRUST
x
WW
AdAdppAppAuAuF sinsin060602006
266
00000666 & mAummAu f Using C.M.
00060602006
266 umummAppAuAuTHRUST ef
or
we obtain
060600 /:1 mmfAppuufmTHRUST fe T
and
DRAGFRICTION
A
WA
DRAGPRESURE
A
WA
WW
AdAdppDRAGD sinsin0
1 2 30 4 5 6
SUPERSONICCOMPRESSION
SUBSONICCOMPRESSION
COMBUSTIONFUEL
INJECTION EXPANSION
NOZZLECOMBUSTIONCHAMBER
DIFFUSER
FLAMEHOLDERS
EXHAUSTJET
0V
0A
fm
x
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
FLUID DYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
35
PdRRvdVRRHd OOO
,
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
)3 (CONSERVATION OF MOMENT-OF-MOMENTUM (C.M.M.)
SOLO
The Absolute Angular Momentum, of the differential mass and Inertial Velocity ,relative to a reference point O is defined as
vdmd V
The Absolute Angular Momentum of the mass enclosed by C.V. is defined as
Centrifugal Pump
Inlet
Outlet2V
1V
C.V.C.S.
x
z
rz
yO
....,
VCO
VCOOCV PdRRvdVRRH
Let differentiate the Absolute Angular Momentum and use Reynolds’ Transport Theorem
..
,....
,
SCmd
SOVC
I
OREYNOLDS
IVC
O
I
OCV sdVVRRvdtD
VRRDvdVRR
td
d
td
Hd
We have
VVtD
VDRRVVV
tD
VDRR
VtD
RD
tD
RD
tD
VDRR
tD
VRRD
O
I
OO
I
O
I
O
II
O
I
O
FLUID DYNAMICS
36
int, : fdRRfdRRvdtD
VDRRMd OextO
I
OO
..
,......
,
SCmd
SO
P
VCO
VCI
O
REYNOLDS
IVC
O
I
OCV sdVVRRvdVVvdtD
VDRRvdVRR
td
d
td
Hd
CV
Centrifugal Pump
Inlet
Outlet2V
1V
C.V.C.S.
x
z
rz
yO
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(3) CONSERVATION OF MOMENT-OF-MOMENTUM (C.M.M.)
SOLO
The Moment, of the differential mass dm = ρdv, relative to a reference point O is defined as
Therefore
Let integrate this equation over the control volume C.V.
0
..
int
....
, VC
O
VC
extO
VC I
OOCV fdRRfdRRvdtD
VDRRM
Using the differential of Angular Momentum equation we obtain
..
,..
,..
,
SCmd
SO
P
VCOOCV
IVC
O
I
OCV sdVVRRvdVVMvdVRRtd
d
td
Hd
CV
kk
jjOj
SC sdTsd
O
VC
O
VC
extOOtCV MFRRsdtfnpRRvdgRRfdRRM
�......
, 11
Also
j
jOj FRR
- Moment, relative to O, of discrete forces exerting by the surrounding at point
jR
- Discrete Moments exerting by the surrounding.k
kM
FLUID DYNAMICS
37
kk
jjO
SC sdTsd
O
VC
O
P
VC
O
SC md
SO
IVC
O
VC Ir
OOCV MFrsdtfnprvdgrvdVVsdVVrvdVrtd
dvd
tD
VDRRM
CV
O
�
,
..
,
..
,
....
,,
..
,
Reynolds
..
, 11
,
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
)3 (CONSERVATION OF MOMENT-OF-MOMENTUM (C.M.M.)
SOLO
Let find the equation of moment around the turbomachine axis.
Centrifugal Pump
Inlet
Outlet2V
1V
C.V.C.S.
x
z
rz
yO
We shall use polar coordinates , where z is the turbomachine axis.
zr ,,
zzrrrOˆˆ
,
zVVrVV zrˆˆˆ
zFFrFF zrˆˆˆ
zVrVrVzrVz
VVV
zr
zr
Vr zrz
zr
Oˆˆ0
ˆˆˆ
,
kkz
jj
tvextCVO
SCS
VC
MFrdfrPVsdVVrvdVrtd
d
0
..,
..
The moment of momentum equation around the turbomachine z axis.
Example
FLUID DYNAMICS
38
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(3) CONSERVATION OF MOMENT-OF-MOMENTUM (C.M.M.)
SOLO
Centrifugal Pump
Inlet
Outlet2V
1V
C.V.C.S.
x
z
rz
yO
systemoutsidefromexertedTorque
M
llz
jj
tvext
AVVrAVVr
SCS
statesteady
VC
zSnSn
MFrdfrsdVVrvdVrtd
d
22,21111,122
..,
0
..
We obtain
zflow MQVrVr 111122
or
zSnSnSn MAVVrVrAVVrAVVr 11,1112211,11122,222
Euler Turbine Equation
ρ1 - mean fluid density one inlet (1) of area A1. where
ρ2 - mean fluid density one outlet (2) of area A2.
(Vθ )1, r1 - mean fluid tangential velocity and radius one inlet (1) of area A1.
(Vθ )2, r2 - mean fluid tangential velocity and radius one outlet (2) of area A2.
(V,Sn )1 - mean fluid normal velocity (relative to A1) one inlet (1) of area A1.
(V,Sn )2 - mean fluid normal velocity (relative to A2) one outlet (2) of area A2.
- mean flow rate one outlet (1) of area A1. 11,1 : AVQ Snflow
Leonhard Euler(1707-1783)
FLUID DYNAMICSReturn to Table of Content
39
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (DIFFERENTIAL FORM)
- Fluid mean velocity u r t, sec/m
- Body Forces Acceleration- (gravitation, electromagnetic,..)
G
- Surface Stress 2/ mNT
nnpnT ˆ~ˆˆ~
mV(t)
G
q
T n ~
d E
d t
Q
t
uu
d s n ds- Internal Energy of Fluid molecules (vibration, rotation, translation) per volume
e
3/ mJ
- Rate of Heat transferred to the Control Volume (chemical, external sources of heat) 3/ mW
Q
t
- Rate of Work change done on fluid by the surrounding (rotating shaft, others) (positive for a compressor, negative for a turbine)td
Ed
3/ mW
SOLO
Consider a volume vF(t) attached to the fluid, bounded by the closed surface SF(t).
- Rate of Conduction and Radiation of Heat from the Control Surface (per unit surface)
q 2/ mW
40
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 1)
mv(t)
Q
t
uq
u
S(t)
td
Wd
dsnsd ˆ
nT ˆ~
dm
G
- The Internal Energy of the molecules of the fluid plus the Kinetic Energy of the mass moving relative to an Inertial System (I)
The FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
CHANGE OF INTERNAL ENERGY + KINETIC ENERGY =CHANGE DUE TO HEAT + WORK + ENERGY SUPPLIED BY SUROUNDING
SOLO
The energy of the constant mass m in the volume vF(t) attached to the fluid, bounded by the closed surface SF(t) is
This energy will change due to
- The Work done by the surrounding
- Absorption of Heat
- Other forms of energy supplied to the mass (electromagnetic, chemical,…)
41
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 2)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATIONC.E.-1
systementeringtd
Qd
tSv
systemontnmenenvirobydonetd
Wd
shaft
tSv
v
REYNOLDS
KineticInternal
tv
FF
FF
FF
sdqvdt
Q
td
Wd
ForcesSurface
sdTu
ForcesBody
vdGu
vduetD
Dvdue
td
d
)(
)(
2)3(
)(
2
2
1
2
1
systementeringtd
Qd
tSkk
tv
systemontnemnoenvirbydonetd
Wd
shaft
tSkk
tvkk
tv
REYNOLDS
KineticInternal
tv
FF
FF
FF
dsqvdt
Q
td
Wd
ForcesSurface
sdTu
ForcesBody
vdGu
vduetD
Dvdue
td
d
)()(
)()(
)(
2)3(
)(
2
2
1
2
1
SOLO
42
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 3)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATIONC.E.-2
)()(
)()()(
)1(
)()(
)()()(
)(
2
~
~
2
1
tvtv
tvtvtv
GAUSS
td
Qd
tStv
td
Wd
tStStv
tv
FF
FFF
FF
FFF
F
vdqvdt
Q
vduvdupvdGu
sdqvdt
Q
sdusdupvdGu
KineticInternal
vduetD
D
)()(
)()()(
)1(
)()(
)()()(
)(
2
2
1
tV s
s
tV
tV
kk
iki
tV
kk
k
tV
kk
GAUSS
td
Qd
tS
kk
tV
td
Wd
tS
kiki
tS
kk
tV
kk
KineticInternal
tV
vdx
qvd
t
Q
dsx
uds
x
upvdGu
dsqvdt
Q
dsudsupvdGu
vduetD
D
T n p n n ds n ds ~ ~ & 0
td
Wd shaftassume and use
SOLO
43
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE-4)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATIONC.E.-3
Since the last equation is valid for each vF(t) we can drop the integral and obtain:
qt
Q
uGuupuetD
D
~2
1 2
k
k
kk
k
iik
k
k
x
q
t
Q
uGx
u
x
upue
tD
D
2
2
1
Multiply (C.L.M.-2) byu
~ upuuGtD
uDu
k
iki
k
kkki
i xu
x
puuGu
tD
D
tD
uDu
2
Subtract this equation from (C.E.-3)C.E.-4
D e
D tp u u u
Q
tq
~ ~
D e
D tp
u
xu
u
x
Q
t
q
x
k
kik
i
k
k
k
~ ~ u u 0
ik
i
k
u
x0
(Proof of inequality given later)
SOLO
44
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 5)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
Enthalpy
Use this result and (C.E.-4)
C.E.-5
p
eh :
tD
pDup
tD
hDu
p
tD
pD
tD
hD
tD
Dp
tD
pD
tD
hD
tD
pD
tD
hD
tD
eD
2
tD
pD
x
up
tD
hD
x
up
tD
pD
tD
hD
tD
pDp
tD
hD
tD
pD
tD
pD
tD
hD
tD
eD
k
k
k
k
2
t
tD
pD
tD
hD
t
Q
x
q
tD
pD
tD
hD
k
k
SOLO
~ ~ u u 0
ik
i
k
u
x0
45
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.4) CONSERVATION OF ENERGY (C.E.) – THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 6)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
Total Enthalpy
Use this result and (C.E.-3)
C.E.-6
22
2
1
2
1: u
peuhH
t
pup
tD
HD
tD
pDup
tD
HD
p
tD
D
tD
HDue
tD
D
2
2
1
t
pup
xtD
HD
tD
pD
x
up
tD
HD
p
tD
D
tD
HDue
tD
D
kk
k
2
2
1
qt
QuGu
t
p
tD
HD
~
k
kkk
k
iik
x
q
t
QuG
x
u
t
p
tD
HD
SOLO
46
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
(4) THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
SOLO
Casing
Impeller
Centrifugal Pump
Control Volume(C.V.)
fluidmd
pvdpv
pv
fluidmd
2V
1V
Inlet
Outlet Let apply the First Law of Thermodynamicsto an element of fluid of mass dmfluid
fluidfluidfluid dmondone
WorkExternaldmto
addedHeatdmof
ChangeEnergyTotal
WQEd
EnergyPotential
fluid
EnergyInternal
fluid
EnergyKinetic
fluid
dmofChngeEnergyTotal
mdhgmdumdV
dEd
fluid
2
2
boundaryliquidatDonemdinside
volumeandpressurechangetodoneWork
fluidfluidfluid
FrictionbyLosesSystem
fluid
fluid
Losses
LiquidShaftboundaryatDone
fluid
fluid
shaft
dmondoneWorkExternal
fluid
fluid
mdpd
mdp
mdpmd
md
Wddmd
md
WddW
We obtain
pd
md
Wdd
md
Wdd
md
Qzdgud
Vd
fluid
loss
fluid
shaft
fluid2
2
First Law of Thermodynamics
FLUID DYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
47
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)SOLO
THERMODYNAMIC PROCESSES
1. ADIABATIC PROCESSES
2. REVERSIBLE PROCESSES
3. ISENTROPIC PROCESSES
No Heat is added or taken away from the System
No dissipative phenomena (viscosity, thermal, conductivity, mass diffusion, friction, etc)
Both adiabatic and reversible
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS AND ENTROPY PRODUCTION
48
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS AND ENTROPY PRODUCTION
2nd LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
Using GAUSS’ THEOREM
0)()(
tStv FF
AdT
qvds
td
d
00)(
)1(
)()(
tv
GAUSS
tStv FFF
vdT
q
tD
sDAd
T
qvd
tD
sD
- Change in Entropy per unit volumed s
- Local TemperatureT K
- Fluid Density 3/ mKg
d e q w T ds p dv d sd e
T
p
Tdv
SOLO
For a Reversible Process
- Rate of Conduction and Radiation of Heat from the System per unit surface
q
2/ mW
Gibbs Relation
Josiah Willard Gibbs (1839-1903)
49
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 1)
d e q w T ds p dv d sd e
T
p
Tdv
uT
p
tD
eD
Tu
T
p
tD
eD
T
tD
D
T
p
tD
eD
TtD
D
T
p
tD
eD
TtD
vD
T
p
tD
eD
TtD
sD
utD
DMC
v
2
.).(
2
1
1
11
The Energy Equation (C.E.-4) is
k
iik x
uoruu
t
Qqup
tD
eD
~~
Tt
Q
TT
qup
tD
eD
TtD
sD
11
or
t
tD
sDT
SOLO
50
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 2)
Define
TD s
D tq
Q
t
D s
Dt
q
T
0 Entropy Production Rate per unit volume
Therefore
q
T T
Q
t T
q
Tdv
V t
10
&
SOLO
51
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 3)
q q qq conduction rate per unit surface
q radiation rate per unit surfacec r
c
r
q K T K FOURIER s Conduction Lawc 0 '
q
T
q
T
q
T Tq q
Tq
TK T q
T
K TT
T qT
KT
Tq
T
r
r r
1 1 1 1
1 1 12
2
KT
T T T
Q
tq
T
K
Tr
2 1 10
0
0
D s
D t
q
TK
T
T T T
Q
tq
Tr
2 1 10
SOLO
JEAN FOURIER1768-1830
52
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 4)
SOLO
Gibbs Function
Helmholtz Function
sThG :
sTeH :
Josiah Willard Gibbs (1839-1903)
Hermann Ludwig Ferdinandvon Helmholtz(1821 – 1894)
Using the Relations
vdpsdTed
pdvsdTvpdedhd vpep
eh
:
pdvTdssdTTdshdGd
vdpTdsTdssdTedHd
dvT
p
T
edsd
53
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS (CONTINUE - 5)
SOLO
Maxwell’s Relations
vdpsdTed
pdvsdThd
pdvTdsGd
vdpTdsHd
Ts
pv
v
Fp
v
e
s
hT
s
e
vp
Ts
T
Fs
T
G
p
Gv
p
h
ps
vs
s
v
p
T
s
p
v
T
vT
pT
T
p
v
s
T
v
p
s
James Clerk Maxwell(1831-1879)
Return to Table of Content
54
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS FOR GASES
(2.6.1) NEWTONIAN FLUID DEFINITION – NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS
~~ Ip
Stress
NEWTONIAN FLUID:
ndn
uu
u
dydx
n
u
x
n
The Shear Stress onA Surface Parallelto the Flow =Distance Rate ofChange of Velocity
SOLO
CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
ikikik p
VECTOR NOTATION
- Stress tensor (force per unit surface) of the surrounding on the control surface 2/ mN
~
- Shear stress tensor (force per unit surface) of the surrounding on the control surface 2/ mN
~
55
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NEWTONIAN FLUID DEFINITION – NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS
M. NAVIER 1822INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS
(MOLECULAR MODEL)
G.G. STOKES 1845COMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS
(MACROSCOPIC MODEL)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
IuuuIpIp T ~~
ikk
k
i
k
k
iikikikik x
u
x
u
x
upp
3
232~0 utrutrIutruutrtr T
3
20322
i
iik
k
k
i
iii x
u
x
u
x
u
SOLO
STOKES ASSUMPTION 3
20~ trace
μ, λ - Lamé parameters from Elasticity
56
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.2) VECTORIAL DERIVATION
I
x
y
zT n ~
ds n ds
r
druu + du unrdtd
t
uurdtd
t
uud
1
rdnurdnuuntdt
uud
RotationnTranslatio
1
2
11
2
11
OR
DEFINITION OF NEWTONIAN FLUID, NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION
nnunuunnpT
nTranslatio
1~11
2
1121
CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM EQUATIONS
SOLO
57
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.2)VECTORIAL DERIVATION (CONTINUE) I
x
y
zT n ~
d s n ds
r
druu + du
CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM EQUATIONS
)(
)()()()()(
)()()()()()(
251
2
2
2
112
1121
tV
GAUSS
tStStStStV
tStStVtStVtV
vd
GAUSS
u
GAUSS
u
GAUSS
u
GAUSS
pG
usdusdusdsdpvdG
sdnunuunsdnpvdGdsTvdGvdtD
uD
BUT
2 2 2 u u u
2 2 u u u u
THEN
SOLO
58
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
I
x
y
zT n ~
d s n ds
r
druu + du
THEREFORE
)()(
2tVtV
vduuupGvdtD
uD
OR
uupGtD
uD 2
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.2)VECTORIAL DERIVATION (CONTINUE)
59
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM
~ p u u
2
k
k
ii
k
k
i
iii
ik
x
u
xx
u
x
u
xx
p
x
2
Du
DtG
G p u u
~
2
k
k
ii
k
k
i
iii
i
iki
i
x
u
xx
u
x
u
xx
pG
xG
tD
uD
2
USING STOKES ASSUMPTION tr ~ 02
3
uupG
GtD
uD
3
4
~
k
k
ki
k
k
i
kki
k
iki
i
x
u
xx
u
x
u
xx
pG
xG
tD
uD
3
4
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
60
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
VECTOR NOTATION CARTESIAN TENSOR NOTATION
Euler Equations are obtained by assuming Inviscid Flow
03
20~
pGtD
uD
ii
i
x
pG
tD
uD
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.2) EULER EQUATIONS
pGuut
u
i
ik
ik
i
x
pG
x
uu
t
u
or or
Leonhard Euler (1707-1783)
61
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.3) COMPUTATION
BUT
iki
kik
i
kki
k
iik
i
k
k
iik ik
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
x
u
xD
ik ki1
2
1
2
ik ik kk ikD D 2
HENCE ik ik ik kk ik ikD D D D2
OR
2 2
2 2
11 11 22 33 11 22 11 22 33 22
33 11 22 33 33 122
212
132
312
232
322
D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D DD Dij ji
2 2 2 2112
222
332
122
132
232
11 22 33
2 D D D D D D D D DOR
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
62
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.3) COMPUTATION (CONTINUE)
USING STOKES ASSUMPTION: tr ~ 02
3
2 2 2 2112
222
332
122
132
232
11 22 33
2 D D D D D D D D D
2
3
4
3
4
3
42
3
11 22 33
2
11 22 11 33 22 33 112
222
332
2
122
132
232
11 22 33
2
112
222
332
D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D
D D D
OR
2
34 011 22
2
11 33
2
22 33
2
122
132
232 D D D D D D D D D
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
63
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.4) ENTROPY AND VORTICITY
From (C.L.M.)
or
Du
Dt
u
t
uu u G p u u
2
2
1 1 12
GIBBS EQUATION: T d s d hd p
tld
pd
tdt
pldp
hd
tdt
hldh
sd
tdt
sldsT &
1
Since this is true for d l t
&
T s hp
Ts
t
h
t
p
t
&1
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
Josiah Willard Gibbs(1903 – 1839)
64
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.4) ENTROPY AND VORTICITY
from (C.L.M.)
or
GIBBS EQUATION: T d s d hd p
tld
pd
tdt
pldp
hd
tdt
hldh
sd
tdt
sldsT &
1
Since this is true for all d l t
&
T s hp
Ts
t
h
t
p
t
&1
SOLO
hsTGp
Guuut
uII
III
II
I
,,
,,,
,
2
,
~~
2
1
p
hsT
dlpdp
dlhdh
dlsds
65
Luigi Crocco 1909-1986
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.4) ENTROPY AND VORTICITY (CONTINUE)
Define
Let take the CURL of this equation
Vorticityu
If , then from (C.L.M.) we get:
G
CRROCO’s EQUATION (1937)
~1
0
2
2
uhsTuu
t
SOLO
~
2
1 ,2
,,
I
II
I
uhsTut
u
hsTGuuut
uII
I
II
I
,,
,
,
2
,
~
2
1
From
66
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.4) ENTROPY AND VORTICITY (CONTINUE)
u u u u u u
0
0
T s T s
~
0
1~1~1
Therefore
~1
sTuuu
t
SOLO
~1
sTuu
tD
D
or
67
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.1) NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.1.4) ENTROPY AND VORTICITY (CONTINUE)
~1
sTuu
tD
D
FLUID WITHOUT VORTICITY WILL REMAIN FOREVER WITHOUTVORTICITY IN ABSENSE OF ENTROPY GRADIENTS OR VISCOUSFORCES
- FOR AN INVISCID FLUID 0 0~ ~
sTuutD
DINVISCID
0~~
- FOR AN HOMENTROPIC FLUID INITIALLY AT REST
s const everywhere i e ss
t. ; . . &
0 0
0 0
D
Dts
0 0 0 0 0~ ~, ,
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
68
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.2) STATE EQUATION
p - PRESSURE (FORCE / SURFACE)
V - VOLUME OF GAS
M - MASS OF GAS
R - 8314
- 286.9
T - GAS TEMPERATURE
- GAS DENSITY
m3
kg
J kg mol Ko/ ( )
J kg Ko/ ( )R
kgmol /
oK
kg m/ 3
2/ mN
IDEAL GAS
TRMVp
TMVp R
DEFINE:
M
Vv
V
M&
1
pv TR
p T ROR
SOLO
69
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
IDEAL GAS TMVp R
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.2) STATE EQUATION
70
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
VAN DER WAALS (1873) EQUATION
ARISE FROM THE EXISTENCEOF INTERNAL FORCES BETWEENGAS MOLECULES
REAL GAS
TRbvv
ap
2
2/ va
IS PROPORTIONAL TO THEVOLUME OCCUPIED BY THEGAS MOLECULES THEMSELVES
b
070.15100
488.01400
686.0920
510.0350
587.0344
427.08.62
372.057.8
2
2
2
2
3
2
6
Hg
OH
CO
O
Air
H
He
molelbm
ft
molelbm
ftatm
baGAS
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.2) STATE EQUATION
71
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
VAN DER WAALS (1873) EQUATION
REAL GAS TRbvv
ap
2
SOLO
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.2) STATE EQUATION
Return to Table of Content
72
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.3) THERMALLY PERFECT GAS AND CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS
A THERMALLY PERFECT GAS IS DEFINED AS A GAS FOR WHICH THEINTERNAL ENERGY e IS A FUNCTION ONLY OF THE TEMPERATURE T.
h e T p e T RT h T / ( ) THERMALLY PERFECT GAS
DEFINE
C
C
v
V V
p
p p p p
e
T
q
T
h
T
de pdv v d p
d T
de pdv
d T
dq
d T
A CALORICALLY PERFECT GAS IS DEFINED AS A GAS FOR WHICH IS CONSTANT
Cv
CALORICALLY PERFECT GAS e C Tv
SOLO
73
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.3) CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS (CONTINUE)
A CALORICALLY PERFECT GAS IS DEFINED AS A GAS FOR WHICH IS CONSTANT
Cv
CALORICALLY PERFECT GAS e C Tv
FOR A CALORICALLY PERFECT GAS
h C T RT C R T C T C C Rv v p p v
C
CC R C
Rp
v
C C R
p
R C C
v
p v p v
1 1
air 14.
SOLO
74
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.3) CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.3.1) ENTROPY CALCULATIONS FOR A CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS
pv TR p T R IDEAL GAS
ds
de pdv
T
de pdv vdp vdp
T
dh vdp
T
ds CdT
TR
dv
vs s C
T
TR
v
vC
T
TRv v v 2 1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
ln ln ln ln
1
2
1
212 lnln
p
pR
T
TCss
p
dpR
T
dTCds pp
s s Cp
pR C
p
pCv v p2 1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
ln ln ln ln
ENTROPY
SOLO
75
FLUID DYNAMICS
2. BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
(2.6) CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS
(2.6.3) CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS (CONTINUE)
(2.6.3.1) ENTROPY CALCULATIONS FOR A CALORICALLLY PERFECT GAS
p
p
T
Te
T
Te
p
p
T
T
C
R s s
R
s s
R
isentropic
s sp
2
1
2
1
2
1
12
1
2
1
12 1 2 1 2 1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
12
1
2
1
1
12 1 2 1 2 1
T
Te
T
Te
T
T
C
R s s
R
s s
R
isentropic
s sv
p
pe e
p
p
C
C s s
R
s s
R
isentropic
s sp
v2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2 1 2 1 2 1
T
T
h
h
p
pe
p
pe
T
T
h
h
p
p
s s
C
s s
C
isentropic
s sv p2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
12
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
12 1 2 12 1
ISENTROPIC CHAIN
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
76
FLUID DYNAMICS
BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS (CONTINUE)
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
SOLO
Viscous Flow Inviscid Flow 0 0
0
wallu 0ˆ nwallu
n wallu
0
wallu
Upstream Flow uu
(a) Temperature of the wall given wallTwallT
(b) Temperature of the wall not given
k
q
n
T wall
wall
wallq Heat transfer through the surface
k Thermal conductivity
77
EXAMPLE: BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
pd
dpmd
Wddhdgud
Vd
fluid
shaft
1
2
2
(5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
SOLO
Assume an isentropic process (ds = 0)
0Q- no heat added
0
fluid
loss
md
Wdd- no losses
The First Law of Thermodynamics becomes
From Gibbs Law 01
0
dpudsdT
Gibbs
Isentropic
Combine First Law of Thermodynamics with Gibbs Law, to obtain:
hdgpdV
dmd
Wdd
fluid
shaft
2
2
Casing
Impeller
Centrifugal Pump
Control Volume(C.V.)
fluidmd
pvdpv
pv
fluidmd
2V
1V
Inlet
Outlet
Second Law of Thermodynamics for an isentropic process
FLUID DYNAMICS
78
(5) THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
SOLO
Assume an isentropic process (ds = 0)
hdgpdV
dmd
Wdd
fluid
shaft
2
2
1. For an incompressible fluid (ρ = const, dρ = 0)
and integrate this equation
1212
2
1
2
2
2hhg
ppVV
md
Wdltheoretica
ltheoreticafluid
shaft
2. For a perfect gas and an isentropic process
const
pp
1
1
hdgpd
p
pVd
md
Wdd
fluid
shaft
1
/1
1
2
2
12
11
1
11
2
1
/1
1
2
1
2
2
11
1
2hhgpp
pVV
md
Wdltheoretica
ltheoreticafluid
shaft
12
1
1
1
2
1
/1
1
2
1
2
2
12hhgpp
pVV ltheoretica
11
1
11
1
1
/1
1
111TcTR
pp
pp
12
1
1
21
2
1
2
2 12
hhgp
pTc
VV
md
Wdp
ltheoretica
ltheoreticafluid
shaft
Casing
Impeller
Centrifugal Pump
Control Volume(C.V.)
fluidmd
pvdpv
pv
fluidmd
2V
1V
Inlet
Outlet
12
1
1
21
1
1
/1
1
2
1
2
2 112
hhgp
pp
pVV ltheoretica
FLUID DYNAMICS
EXAMPLE: BASIC LAWS IN FLUID DYNAMICS
79
TURBOMACHINERY EXAMPLE: EFFICIENCY OF A PUMP
SOLO
The efficiency is composed of three parts:
• Volumetric efficiency:L
v QQ
Q
Loss of fluid due to leakage in the impeller-casing clearanceLQ
• Hydraulic efficiency:s
f
h h
h1
1. Shock loss due to imperfect match between inlet flow and blade entrance
2. Friction loss
3. Circulation loss due to imperfect match at the exit side of the blade
has three parts:fh
• Mechanic efficiency:T
Pf
m 1
Power loss due to mechanical friction in the bearings, and other contact points in the pump.
fP
Total efficiency is :mhv :
Casing
Impeller
Centrifugal Pump
Return to Table of Content
80
SOLODimensionless Equations
Dimensionless Variables are:
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
Field Equations
(C.M.): 00
00U
lu
t
200
0
~
3
4
U
luupGuu
t
u
(C.L.M.):
300
0~U
lTk
t
QuGu
t
pHu
t
H
q
(C.E.):
0
/
/
000
00
0
U
ul
lUt
000
000
0
00
00
000
0
200
020
0
000
000
0
0
3
4
/
/
U
ull
UlU
ull
Ul
U
pl
g
G
U
lg
U
ul
U
u
lUt
Uu
2
0
00
00
0
000
02
000002
0
0
02
00
020000
200000 /
~
// U
CTl
k
kl
C
k
UlU
Q
lUtU
u
g
G
U
gl
U
u
Ul
U
p
lUtU
H
lUtD
D p
p
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~
0/~
kkk
Reference Quantities: ρ0(density), U0(velocity), l0 (length), g (gravity), μ0 (viscosity), k0 (Fourier Constant), λ0 (mean free path)
0/~
81
SOLODimensionless Equations
Dimentionless Field Equations
(C.M.): 0~~~~ u
t
uR
uR
pGF
uut
u
eer
~~~~1
3
4~~~~1~~~~1~~~~
~~
2
(C.L.M.):
TkPRt
QuG
Fu
t
pHu
t
H
rer
11
~
~~~~1~~~
~~~~~
~
~~
2
(C.E.):
Reynolds:0
000
lU
Re Prandtl:0
0
k
CP p
r
Froude:
0
0
gl
UFr
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~
0/~
kkk
Dimensionless Variables are:
Reference Quantities: ρ0(density), U0(velocity), l0 (length), g (gravity), μ0 (viscosity), k0 (Fourier Constant), λ0 (mean free path)
0/~
Knudsenl
Kn0
0:
82
SOLODimensionless Equations
Constitutive Relations
TRp
2
2
1uTCH p
Tkq
TCh p
200
200
200
1
U
TC
U
TC
C
R
U
p pp
p
20
20 U
TC
U
h p
2
020
20 2
1
U
u
U
TC
U
H p
20
000
0
000
0300 U
TCl
k
k
C
k
UlU
q p
p
33
2~ Iuuu T 3
00
0000
0
00
00
0000
0
00 3
2~I
U
ul
UlU
ul
U
ul
UlU
T
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~
0/~
kkk
Dimensionless Variables are:
Reference Quantities: ρ0(density), U0(velocity), l0 (length), g (gravity), μ0 (viscosity), k0 (Fourier Constant), λ0 (mean free path)
0/~
83
SOLODimensionless Equations
Dimensionless Constitutive Relations
2~2
1~~uTH
Tp~~1~
Ideal Gas
3
~~~
3
2~~~~~~~ IuR
uuR e
T
e
Navier-Stokes
Th~~
Calorically Perfect Gas
TkPR
qre
~~~11~
Fourier Law
Reynolds:0
000
lU
Re
Prandtl:0
0
k
CP p
r
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~ 0/~
Uuu gGG /~ 2
00/~ Upp
0/~ lUtt
20/
~UCTT p 2
00/~ U 2
0/~
UHH 20/
~Uhh 2
0/~ Uee 200/~ Uqq 2/
~UQQ
0
~l
0/~
0/~
kkk
Dimensionless Variables are:
Reference Quantities: ρ0(density), U0(velocity), l0 (length), g (gravity), μ0 (viscosity), k0 (Fourier Constant), λ0 (mean free path)
0/~
Return to Table of Content
84
SOLO
Mach Number
Mach number (M or Ma) / is a dimensionless quantity representing the ratio of speed of an object moving through a fluid and the local speed of sound.
• M is the Mach number,• U0 is the velocity of the source relative to the medium, and
• a0 is the speed of sound
• M is the Mach number,• U0 is the velocity of the source relative to the medium, and
• a0 is the speed of sound
Mach:0
0
a
UM
The Mach number is named after Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach, a designation proposed by aeronautical engineer Jakob Ackeret.
Ernst Mach (1838–1916)
Jakob Ackeret (1898–1981)
m
Tk
Mo
TRa B
0
• R is the Universal gas constant, (in SI, 8.314 47215 J K−1 mol−1), [M1 L2 T−2 θ−1 'mol'−1]
• γ is the rate of specific heat constants Cp/Cv and is dimensionless γair = 1.4.
• γ is the rate of specific heat constants Cp/Cv and is dimensionless γair = 1.4.• T is the thermodynamic temperature [θ1]• T is the thermodynamic temperature [θ1]
• Mo is the molar mass, [M1 'mol'−1]
• m is the molecular mass, [M1]
AERODYNAMICS
85
SOLO
Different Regimes of Flow
Mach Number – Flow Regimes
AERODYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
86
whereρ = air densityV = true speedl = characteristic lengthμ = absolute (dynamic) viscosityυ = kinematic viscosity
Reynolds:
lVlVRe
Osborne Reynolds (1842 –1912)
It was observed by Reynolds in 1884 that a Fluid Flow changes from Laminar to Turbulent at approximately the same value of the dimensionless ratio (ρ V l/ μ) where l is the Characteristic Length for the object in the Flow. This ratio is called the Reynolds number, and is the governing parameter for Viscous Flow.
Reynolds Number and Boundary Layer
SOLO 1884AERODYNAMICS
87
Boundary Layer
SOLO 1904AERODYNAMICS
Ludwig Prandtl(1875 – 1953)
In 1904 at the Third Mathematical Congress, held at Heidelberg, Germany, Ludwig Prandtl (29 years old) introduced the concept of Boundary Layer. He theorized that the fluid friction was the cause of the fluid adjacent to surface to stick to surface – no slip condition, zero local velocity, at the surface – and the frictional effects were experienced only in the boundary layer a thin region near the surface. Outside the boundary layer the flow may be considered as inviscid (frictionless) flow. In the Boundary Layer on can calculate the •Boundary Layer width•Dynamic friction coefficient μ•Friction Drag Coefficient CDf
88
LAMINAR
TRANSIENTTURBULENT
LAMINARFLOW
PROFILE
TURBULENTFLOW
PROFILE
FLATPLATE
- LOW THICKNESS- LOW VELOCITY NEXT TO SURFACE- GRADUAL VELOCITY CHANGE- LOW SKIN FRICTION
- GREATER THICKNESS- HIGHER VELOCITY NEXT TO SURFACE- SHARP VELOCITY CHANGE- HIGHER SKIN FRICTION
DEVELOPMENT OF BOUNDARY LAYERON A SMOOTH FLAT PLATE
LAMINARSUB-LAYER
J.D. NICOLAIDES “FREE FLIGHT MISSILE DYNAMICS” pp. 422The flow within the Boundary Layer can be of two types:•The first one is Laminar Flow, consists of layers of flow sliding one over other in a regular fashion without mixing.•The second one is called Turbulent Flow and consists of particles of flow that moves in a random and irregular fashion with no clear individual path, In specifying the velocity profile within a Boundary Layer, one must look at the mean velocity distribution measured over a long period of time.There is usually a transition region between these two types of Boundary-Layer Flow
SOLO AERODYNAMICS
89
LAMINAR
TRANSIENTTURBULENT
LAMINARFLOW
PROFILE
TURBULENTFLOW
PROFILE
FLATPLATE
- LOW THICKNESS- LOW VELOCITY NEXT TO SURFACE- GRADUAL VELOCITY CHANGE- LOW SKIN FRICTION
- GREATER THICKNESS- HIGHER VELOCITY NEXT TO SURFACE- SHARP VELOCITY CHANGE- HIGHER SKIN FRICTION
DEVELOPMENT OF BOUNDARY LAYERON A SMOOTH FLAT PLATE
LAMINARSUB-LAYER
J.D. NICOLAIDES “FREE FLIGHT MISSILE DYNAMICS” pp. 422
Normalized Velocity profiles within a Boundary-Layer, comparison betweenLaminar and Turbulent Flow.
SOLO
Boundary-Layer
AERODYNAMICS
90
4Re
40Re4
150Re40
5103Re300
65 103Re103
Flow Characteristics around a Cylindrical Body as a Function of Reynolds Number (Viscosity)
AERODYNAMICSSOLO
91
Relative Drag Force as a Function of Reynolds Number (Viscosity)
AERODYNAMICS
Drag CD0 due toFlow Separation
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
92
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
u
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3
00
0..
dpududp
dhTdsisentropic
ududhdHEC
increaseudecreasep
decreaseuincreasepu
du
dp
d
M
d
u
ad
d
dp
u
dp
uu
du
ds22
2
022
111
0..
2
A
dA
u
dudMC
u
duM
d
u
duM
Mu
duM
A
dA
u
du
u
du
a
da
u
du
M
dM
a
uM
d
u
duM
a
dad
p
dpisentropic
22
2
2
111
2
1
1
2
u
duM
d
u
du
A
dA12
M
dM
M
M
A
dA
p
dp
MA
dA
2
2
2
21
1
1
11
1
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0 t
0
93
STEADY QUASI 1-DIMENSIONAL GASESSOLO
M
dM
M
M
p
dp
M
d
Mu
duM
d
u
du
A
dA
2
2
222
21
1
111
1111
u increase
p decrease
p increase
u decrease
p increase
u decrease
u increase
p decrease
0dA0dA
1M
1M
(1) At M=0 decrease in A gives a proportional
increase in velocity u
du
A
dA
(2) For 0 < M < 1 the relation between A and u is the same as for incompressible flow.
FLOW IN CONVERGING/DIVERGING DUCTS
(3) For M > 1 increase in A increases u . Explanation: When M > 1 , ρ increases faster than u, so A must increase to keep
constAum
(4) M = 1 can be attained only at throat.
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0 t
0
94
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
STAGNATION CONDITIONS
(C.E.)constuhuh 2
22211 2
1
2
1
The stagnation condition 0 is attained by reaching u = 0
2
/
21202020
2
11
12
12
122
12
MTR
u
Tc
u
T
T
c
uTTuhh
TRa
auM
Rc
pp
Tch pp
Using the Isentropic Chain relation, we obtain:
2
10102000
2
11 M
p
p
a
a
h
h
T
T
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0 t
0
95
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
CRITICAL CONDITIONS 1*; 222 Maau
AareacriticalAA *2u
1A
1u
InfiniteReservoir
0
0
0
0
TT
pp
u
*
*
*
*
TT
pp
au
Isentropic FlowExpansion
u increases, p, T, and a decrease
000 ,, sTp remain constant
An ideal gas flows from aninfinite reservoir
000 ,,,0 ppTTu
through a duct with variablearea A. The area A* at whichthe flow reaches the soundvelocity u*=a* is calledcritical area.
2
1
*****
10102000
p
p
a
a
h
h
T
T2
10102000
2
11 M
p
p
a
a
h
h
T
T
1
M
12
1
21
1
22
1
2
0
0
**
0
0
/1 21
21
11*
21
21
1
21
21
11*
***
***
M
MA
MM
MA
a
a
a
a
u
aA
u
uAA
auM
)C.M.( *** AuAum
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0 t
0
96
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW
H hu
C Tu p u a u
constp
C Rtp
2 2 1
0
0
2 2 2 0
2 2 1 2 1 2
a R T
p
Mu
a
Mu
a
H C Tu
C T
p a
p p
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
1 1
(1)Stagnation pointon a path:
The gas is brought) imaginary (by an
adiabatic process to the rest: u = 0
a
a
R T
R T
R
C
u
R T
M
p
0
2
0
2
2
12
11
2
1
22
21
1
2
2
1
21
2
21
1
21
1 M
MMM
M
T
T
a
a
T
TM
1
2
11
22
T
T
a
a
0 0
21 42
10833
.
.
a u a a
a
2 22 2
2
1 2 1 2
1
1 2
MM
M
MM
M
2
2
2
22
2
1
2 1
2
1 1
M* - Characterisic Mach Number
H H1 2
)2(Any two points1 and 2 where
are related by:
(3)The gas is brought)imaginary (by an
adiabatic processto
u* = a*
Alternative Forms of the Quasi One-Dimensional Energy Equation and Definition of Reference Quantitiesu
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0
Ideal and Calorically Perfect Gas (1). p R T h C Tp
t
0
SOLO
97
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW
(1)Stagnation pointon a path:
The gas is brought) imaginary (by an
adiabatic process to the rest: u = 0
H H1 2
)2(Any two points1 and 2 where (3)The gas is brought
)imaginary (by anadiabatic processto
u* = a*
p
p
T
T
True on same path
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
Isentropic Chain
0.1 1 10
M
TT0
pp0
0
1
s
T
T0
T *
p *
p
p0
Cp
u* 21
2
Cp
u21
2
isentropicline
p
pM0 2
1
11
2
p
p
M
M
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
11
2
11
2
p
pM
1
2
11
22
1
p
p
0
1 1 42
10528
.
.
0 2
1
1
11
2
M
2
1
12
22
1
1
11
2
11
2
M
M
1
2
11
22
1
1
M
0
1
1 1 42
10 6339
.
.
Mollier’s Diagram
u
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0
Ideal and Calorically Perfect Gas (2). p R T h C Tp
t
0
Alternative Forms of the Quasi One-Dimensional Energy Equation and Definition of Reference QuantitiesSOLO
are related by:
98
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
0
,,
0
000
u
Tp Bp
xM
1
12
1
2
2
12
11
1
*
xM
xMA
xA
120
2
11
1
xM
p
p
12
00
2
11
xM
ppB
20
2
11
1
xMT
T
0p
xp
0T
xT
1
1
528.0
8333.0
Throat
ISENTROPIC SUPERSONIC NOZZLE FLOW (1)
Assume that the gasin a large containerat rest
0,,, 0000 uTp
The gas is released trough an diverging/converging duct toa second containerin which the pressureis regulated with apump such that
12
00
21
1
M
ppB
u
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3
99
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
0
,,
0
000
u
Tp Bip
xM
1
0p
xp
0T
xT
1
1
528.0
8333.0
Throat
01 / ppB
02 / ppB
03 / ppB
04 / ppB
4BM
2BM 3BM
1BM
3BT
4BT
2BT1BT
ShockShock
ShockWave
ISENTROPIC SUPERSONIC NOZZLE FLOW (2)
Assume that the gasin a large containerat rest
0,,, 0000 uTp
To fit the pressure atthe output a shock wave increases thepressure by a jump.the Mach numberjumps fromSupersonic toSubsonic.
12
00
21
1
M
ppp BBi
the pressure in thesecond container.
Bip
u
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3
100
STEADY QUASI ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWSOLO
12
00
2
11
xM
ppB
0p
xp
1
Bp
120
2
11
1
xM
p
pIsentropic Solution
0
,,
0
000
u
Tp Bp
ISENTROPIC SUPERSONIC NOZZLE FLOW (3)
In this case the ductbetween the two containers has nothroat, therefore ashock wave is notpossible.
u
p
T
e
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
u
p
e
2
2
2
2
T2
A 2 1x1x- A 1
q
Q
11
A 3
Assume that the gasin a large containerat rest
0,,, 0000 uTp
the pressure in thesecond container.
Bip
No Throat
101
STEADY ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW EQUATIONSSOLO
Steady , 1-D Flow ,Adiabatic, , t
0 0Q
G 0
Ideal and Calorically Perfect Gas. p R T h C Tp
0
32 xx
Field Equations:
u
tu
const
u
xG
p
x xM u p P
001
11
11
111
EquMHQuGqu
xx
Hu
t
H
M
1111111 00
0
No. Equations Unknowns Knowns
1 ,u M
Pp 11,1
1 H q E,
1 T
11
17 Eq. 7 Unknowns
Muu
xtu
t
1
0
0
0
(C.M.)
Du
DtG p
~ ~
11
22
33
0 0
0 0
0 0(C.L.M.)
D H
Dt
p
tu G u q Q ~ ~
u
u11
22
33
10 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
(C.E.)
Constitutive RelationsTRp Ideal Gas
H h u C T up 1
2
1
22 2h C TpCalorically Perfect
q KT
x
1
Fourier Conduction Law
11
1
4
3
u
x
22 33
1
2
3
u
x
11 22 33
12 21
13 31
32 23
0
0
0
0
Newtonian Flow
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
102
SOLO
Steady One-Dimensional Flow t
0
x x2 3
0
Flow between two Equilibrium States (1) and (2)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
iki
k
k
i
k
kik
u
x
u
x
u
x
2
3
Assume Newtonian fluid (Navier-Stokes Eq.) in each state
111
1
22 331
1
1
1 2
1
4
3
2
30
u
x
u
x
q KT
x
x
equilibrium
We obtain
Let integrate the field equations between state (1) and state (2)
u1
20
u p G dx2
1
2
12
1
2
11
2
0
uH q u G u Q dx1
2
11
1
2
11
2
0 0
No. Equations Unknowns Knowns
2 2,u 1 1,u1
1
1
p2p G1 1,
H2 H1
3 4
STEADY ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW EQUATIONS
103
SOLO
Steady One-Dimensional Flow t
0
x x2 3
0
Flow between two Equilibrium States (1) and (2)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
1 1 2 2u u
We need one more equation to solve the algebraic equations
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic)
G Q 0 0,
2
1
1
2
u
u
22221
211 pupu
H H h u h u1 2 1 12
2 221
2
1
2
11
1
1
21
1
2
pu
p
p
h
h
u
h2
1
1
2
1
21
21
1
p2 p
1
h2 h
1
General iterative solution:
p
p
up
h
h
u
h2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1 12
,
)1( Choose
)2( Go to Mollier Diagram 2
Compute
2
1
1
2
u
u
)3( Go to
21
21
1
2
1
1
21
1
2 11
21,11
h
u
h
hpu
p
p
h2
p2
2
lg hR
lg sR
pC1
vC1
Mollier Diagram
Since we didn’t use Constitutive Relations this isTrue for all gases
STEADY ONE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW EQUATIONS
Richard Mollier (1863 – 1935)
104
SOLO
11
1
01
1
0
1
0
h
h
T
T
p
p Tch p
pc
uTT
2
21
1
1'
exp''
221
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
pc
ss
p
p
T
T
h
h
s
Torh
1T
2T
2'T
T
pc
u
2
' 22
pc
u
2
21
p
t
c
h
p
t
c
h'
pc
u
2
22
1p
2p
0p
1
2
2'22
22
'
'
'
hh
uu
hh cc
Expansion
12
12
uu
pp
1 2
0
s
Torh
1T
2T
2'T
T
pc
u
2
21
pc
u
2
' 22
p
c
c
h
p
c
c
h'
pc
u
2
22
1p
2p
0p
1
2
2'
22
22
'
'
'
hh
uu
hh tt
Compression
12
12
uu
pp
1 2'
0
Isentropic Process
Adiabatic Process
Steady , Adiabatic + Inviscid = Reversible, , q Q 0 0, ~ ~ 0
G 0
COMPARISON OF ISENTROPIC (ds=0) AND ADIABATIC (Q=0,q=0) FLOW PROCESSES
t
0
Return to Table of Content
105
AERODYNAMICS
Fluid flow is characterized by a velocity vector field in three-dimensional space, within the framework of continuum mechanics. Streamlines, Streaklines and Pathlines are field lines resulting from this vector field description of the flow. They differ only when the flow changes with time: that is, when the flow is not steady.
• Streamlines are a family of curves that are instantaneously tangent to the velocity vector of the flow. These show the direction a fluid element will travel in at any point in time.
• Streaklines are the locus of points of all the fluid particles that have passed continuously through a particular spatial point in the past. Dye steadily injected into the fluid at a fixed point extends along a streakline
• Pathlines are the trajectories that individual fluid particles follow. These can be thought of as a "recording" of the path a fluid element in the flow takes over a certain period. The direction the path takes will be determined by the streamlines of the fluid at each moment in time.
• Timelines are the lines formed by a set of fluid particles that were marked at a previous instant in time, creating a line or a curve that is displaced in time as the particles move.
The red particle moves in a flowing fluid; its pathline is traced in red; the tip of the trail of blue ink released from the origin follows the particle, but unlike the static pathline (which records the earlier motion of the dot), ink released after the red dot departs continues to move up with the flow. (This is a streakline.) The dashed lines represent contours of the velocity field (streamlines), showing the motion of the whole field at the same time. (See high resolution version.
Flow DescriptionSOLO
106
3-D FlowFlow Description
SOLO
Steady Motion: If at various points of the flow field quantities (velocity, density, pressure)associated with the fluid flow remain unchanged with time, the motion is said to be steady.
zyxppzyxzyxuu ,,,,,,,,
Unsteady Motion: If at various points of the flow field quantities (velocity, density, pressure)associated with the fluid flow change with time, the motion is said to be unsteady.
tzyxpptzyxtzyxuu ,,,,,,,,,,,
Path Line: The curve described in space by a moving fluid element is known as its trajectoryor path line.
tt
tt
t
tt tt 2
t
tt tt 2
Path Line (steady flow)
t
tt
tt 2
tt
Path Line (unsteady flow)
tt 2
tt
107
3-D Flow
Flow Description
SOLO
Path Line: The curve described in space by a moving fluid element is known as its trajectoryor path line.
ttt tt 2
Streamlines: The family of curves such that each curve is tangent at each point to the velocity direction at that point are called streamlines.
Consider the coordinate of a point P and the direction of the streamline passingthrough this point. If is the velocity vector of the flow passing through P at a time t,then and parallel, or:
r
rdu
u
rd
0urd
0
1
1
1111
zdyudxv
ydxwdzu
xdzvdyw
wvu
dzdydx
zyx
w
zd
v
yd
u
xd
Cartesian
t
u
r
rd
108
3-D Flow
Flow Description
SOLO
Path Line: The curve described in space by a moving fluid element is known as its trajectoryor path line.
Streamlines: The family of curves such that each curve is tangent at each point to the velocity direction at that point are called streamlines.
tzyxw
zd
tzyxv
yd
tzyxu
xd
,,,,,,,,,
t
u
r
rd
Those are two independent differential equations for a streamline. Given a point the streamline is defined from those equations. 0000 ,,, tzyxr
tzyxw
zd
tzyxv
yd
tzyxv
yd
tzyxu
xd
,,,,,,2
,,,,,,1
0,,,,,,,,,
0,,,,,,,,,
222
111
zdtzyxcydtzyxbxdtzyxa
zdtzyxcydtzyxbxdtzyxa
21
21
22
11
022
11
Pfaffian Differential Equations
For a given a point the solution of those equations is of the form: 0000 ,,, tzyxr
2,,,
1,,,
02
01
consttzyx
consttzyx
u
0tr
rd
0t
11 cr
22 cr
Streamline Those are two surfaces, the
intersection of which is the streamline.
109
3-D Flow
Flow Description
SOLO
Path Line: The curve described in space by a moving fluid element is known as its trajectoryor path line.
Streamlines: The family of curves such that each curve is tangent at each point to the velocity direction at that point are called streamlines.
tzyxw
zd
tzyxv
yd
tzyxu
xd
,,,,,,,,,
t
u
r
rd
For a given a point the solution of those equations is of the form: 0000 ,,, tzyxr
2,,,
1,,,
02
01
consttzyx
consttzyx
u
0tr
rd
0t
11 cr
22 cr
Streamline Those are two surfaces, the
intersection of which is the streamline.
The streamline is perpendicular to the gradients (normals) of those two surfaces.
0201 ,, trtrVr
where μ is a factor that must satisfy the following constraint.
0,, 0201 trtrVr
Return to Table of Content
110
AERODYNAMICS
Streamlines, Streaklines, and PathlinesMathematical description
Streamlines
If the components of the velocity are written and those of the streamline aswe deduce
which shows that the curves are parallel to the velocity vector
Pathlines
Streaklines
where, is the velocity of a particle P at location and time t . The parameter , parametrizes the streakline and 0 ≤ τP ≤ t0 , where t0 is a time of interest .
The suffix P indicates that we are following the motion of a fluid particle. Note that at point
the curve is parallel to the flow velocity vector where the velocity vector is evaluated at the position of the particle at that time t .
SOLO
111
V
Airfoil Pressure Field variation with α
AERODYNAMICS
Airfoil Velocity Field variation with αAirfoil Streamline variation with αAirfoil Streakline with α
Streamlines, Streaklines, and PathlinesSOLO
112
AERODYNAMICSStreamlines, Streaklines, and Pathlines
SOLO
113
AERODYNAMICSSOLO
114
AERODYNAMICSSOLO
115
AERODYNAMICSStreamlines, Streaklines, and Pathlines
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
116
3-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Circulation
SOLO
Circulation Definition:
tV
tVV
S
Sn 1
V
tr
ttr
tC
ttC
C
rdV
:
Material Derivative of the Circulation
CCC
rdtD
DVrd
tD
VDrdV
tD
D
tD
D
From the Figure we can see that:
tVrtVVr ttt
VdrdtD
DV
t
rr tttt
0
02
2
CCC
VdVdVrd
tD
DV
Therefore:
C
rdtD
VD
tD
D
integral of an exact differential on a closed curve.
C – a closed curve
117
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
tV
tVV
S
Sn 1
V
tr
ttr
tC
ttC
S
tC
rdV
:
Material Derivative of the Circulation (second derivation)
Subtract those equations:
tVrdSn t
1
ttC
rdVV
:
S
TheoremsStoke
CC
SnVrdVVrdVttt
1'
S is the surface bounded by the curves Ct and C t+Δ t
tVVrdtVrdVSnVS
t
S
t
S
1
td
d
ttd
rd
tV
ttD
D rdd
Computation of:
tC
rdt
V
t
Computation of:td
d
118
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
tV
tVV
S
Sn 1
V
tr
ttr
tC
ttC
Material Derivative of the Circulation (second derivation)
tVVrdS
t
When Δ t → 0 the surface S shrinks to the curve C=Ct and the surface integral transforms to a curvilinear integral:
C
t
CC
t
C
t
C
t VVrdV
dVVrdV
rdVVrdtd
d
0
22
22
Computation of: (continue)td
d
Finally we obtain:
tt CC
t
C
rdtD
VDVVrdrd
t
V
td
d
ttD
D
119
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
tV
tVV
S
Sn 1
V
tr
ttr
tC
ttC
Material Derivative of the Circulation
We obtained:
tC
rdtD
VD
tD
D
Use C.L.M.: hsTp
VVt
V
tD
VDII
I
G
II
II
,,
,
,,
~
0
,
,,
,
,
~~
tttt CC
I
I
C
I
C
I
I
I
hddrdp
sTrdhrdp
sTtD
D
to obtain:
tC
I
I
I
rdp
sTtD
D ~,
,or:
Kelvin’s Theorem
William Thomson Lord Kelvin(1824-1907)
In an inviscid , isentropic flow d s = 0 with conservative body forces the circulation Γ around a closed fluid line remains constant with respect to time.
0~~ G
1869
Return to Table of Content
120
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
Circulation Definition: C
rdV
:
C – a closed curve
Biot-Savart Formula
1820
Jean-Baptiste Biot1774 - 1862
VorticityV
Space
dVsr
A
4
1
lddSnsr
Ad
4
1
The contribution of a length dl of the Vortex Filament to isA
SS
Stokes
C
SdnSdnVrdV
:
If the Flow is Incompressible 0 u
so we can write , where is the Vector Potential. We are free tochoose so we choose it to satisfy .
AV
A A
0 A
We obtain the Poisson Equation that defines the Vector Potential A
A2 Poisson Equation Solution
Space
dvsr
rA
4
1
Félix Savart1791 - 1841
Biot-Savart Formula
121
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
Circulation Definition: C
rdV
:
C – a closed curve
Biot-Savart Formula (continue - 1)
1820
Jean-Baptiste Biot1774 - 1862
VorticityV
lddSnsr
Ad
4
1We found
SS
Stokes
C
SdnSdnVrdV
:
also we have dlld
ldsr
dSnlddSnsr
AdrV r
S
dlld
v
rr
1
4
1
4
1
34 sr
srldrV
Biot-Savart Formula
Félix Savart1791 - 1841
Biot-Savart Formula
122
3-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Circulation
SOLO
Circulation Definition: C
rdV
:
C – a closed curve
Biot-Savart Formula (continue - 2)
1820
Jean-Baptiste Biot1774 - 1862
34 sr
srldrV
Biot-Savart Formula
General 3D Vortex
Félix Savart1791 - 1841
123
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
Circulation Definition: C
rdV
:
C – a closed curve
Biot-Savart Formula (continue - 3)
1820
Jean-Baptiste Biot1774 - 1862
Félix Savart1791 - 1841
34 sr
srldrV
Biot-Savart Formula
General 3D Vortex
For a 2 D Vortex:
dhsr
dl
sr
srld sinˆˆsin23
dh
dlhl2sin
cot
sin/hsr
ˆ
2sinˆ
4 0 hd
hV
Biot-Savart Formula General 2D Vortex
Biot-Savart Formula
124
3-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
Circulation Definition: C
rdV
:
C – a closed curve
Biot-Savart Formula (continue - 4)
1820
Jean-Baptiste Biot1774 - 1862
34 sr
srldrV
Biot-Savart Formula General 3D Vortex
Félix Savart1791 - 1841
Lifting-Line Theory
Biot-Savart Formula
Return to Table of Content
125
3-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Helmholtz Vortex Theorems
SOLO
Helmholtz : “Uber the Integrale der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welcheDen Wirbelbewegungen entsprechen”, (“On the Integrals of the Hydrodynamical Equations Corresponding to Vortex Motion”), in Journal fur die reine und angewandte, vol. 55, pp. 25-55. , 1858He introduced the potential of velocity φ.
Hermann Ludwig Ferdinandvon Helmholtz
1821 - 1894
Theorem 1: The circulation around a given vortex line (i.e., the strength of the vortex filament) is constant along its length.
Theorem 2: A vortex filament cannot end in a fluid. It mustform a closed path, end at a boundary, or go to infinity.
Theorem 3: No fluid particle can have rotation, if it did not originally rotate.Or, equivalently, in the absence of rotational external forces, a fluid that is initially irrotational remains irrotational. In general we can conclude that thevortex are preserved as time passes. They can disappear only through the action of viscosity (or some other dissipative mechanism).
1858
Return to Table of Content
126
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
In 2-D the velocity vector
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
x
y V
u
vru
v
r
1111 vruyvxuV r
v
r
u
r
u
y
v
x
uV rr
zu
r
v
z
ur
z
vz
y
u
x
vy
z
ux
z
vV rr 111111
0
111
0
111
rr vu
zr
zr
vu
zyx
zyx
V
v
u
v
u r
cossin
sincos
i
r eviuviu
i
r eviuviu
127
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
In 2-D the velocity vector
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
x
y V
u
vru
v
r
1111 vruyvxuV r
v
u
v
u r
cossin
sincos
i
r eviuviu
i
r eviuviu
Continuity: 00 uutD
D
rv
ruz
rr
r
xv
yuzy
yx
xzzu
r
111
11
111
11 22
Incompressible: 0tD
D
Irrotational:
rv
ru
yv
xu
u
r
12
0 u
rrv
rru
xyv
yxu
r
11
128
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
In 2-D the velocity vector
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
x
y V
u
vru
v
r
1111 vruyvxuV r
v
u
v
u r
cossin
sincos
i
r eviuviu
i
r eviuviu
00 222 uu
2-D Incompressible:
2-D Irrotational:
222
0
222
222
1110
110
zzz
zzuu
02
2
2
2
Complex Potential in 2-D Incompressible-Irrotational Flow:
yixz
yxiyxzw
,,:
zd
zwdx
ix
yyi
0x
0y
i
r
i
r eviueviuVviu
zd
wdviu
i
r ezd
wdviu
xyyx
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
We found:
129
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Examples:
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
sincos 00 UiUV Uniform Stream:
xyUv
yxUu
sin
cos
0
0
yUxU
yUxU
cossin
sincos
00
00
zU
zUzUiw
0
00 sincos
0U
130
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Examples:
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
rrv
rrr
mu r
10:
1
2:
x
ymm
yxm
rm
1
22
tan22
ln2
ln2
zm
rem
irm
iw i ln2
ln2
ln2
Definition:
Source , Sink : 0m 0m
Sink 0m
Source 0m
The equation of a streamline is: constm
2
131
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Examples:
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irotational Flow
r
Kvvr
rzuvr
rVu
rrr
0010:0
2
22
1
ln2
ln2
tan22
yxr
x
y
zi
rei
riiw i ln2
ln2
ln2
Definition:
Infinite Line Vortex :
rrrv
rru r
1
2:
10:
ddrrdr
rdrV
2111
2Circulation
streamlines:
/222
22ln2
eyx
yx
Irotational
132
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Examples:
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
Definition: Let have a source and a sink of equal strength m = μ/ε situated at x = -εand x = ε such that
Doublet at the Origin with Axis Along x Axis :
m m
y
x
.lim0
constm
z
zm
z
zm
zm
zm
zw
/1
/1ln
2ln
2
ln2
ln2
.lim0
constm
when
zz
m
zO
z
m
zO
zz
m
z
zmzw
m
22
21ln2
11ln2/1
/1ln
2
2
2
2
2
133
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Examples:
SOLO
Stream Function ψ, Velocity Potential φ in 2-D Incompressible Irrotational Flow
sincos2
1
2ln
2: i
r
m
z
mz
m
zd
d
zd
Wdzw Source
Doublet
22
2/
22
2/
sin
cos
yx
y
r
yx
x
r
m
m
Definition:
Doublet at the Origin with Axis Along x Axis (continue):
2
1
2
1
2 z
m
z
m
zd
d
zd
wdviuV
The equation of a streamline is: .22
constyx
y
22
2
22
yx
134
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Stream Functions (φ), Potential Functions (ψ) for Elementary Flows
Flow W (z=reiθ)=φ+i ψ φ ψ
Uniform Flow cosrU sinrU yixUzU
Source
irek
zk
ln2
ln2
rk
ln2
2
k
Doubletier
B
z
B cos
r
B sinr
B
Vortex(with clockwise
Circulation)
irei
zi
ln2
ln2
2
rln2
90◦ Corner Flow 22
22yix
Az
A yxA 22
2yx
A
Return to Table of Content
135
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
x
y
xy
sd
M
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
where-w (z) – Complex Potential of a Two-Dimensional Inviscid Flow -X, Y – Force Components in x and y directions of the Force per Unit Span on the Body-M – the anti-clockwise Moment per Unit Span about the point z=0-ρ – Air Density-C – Two Dimensional Body Boundary Curve
1911Blasius Theorem
136
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
1911Blasius Theorem
Proof of Blasius Theorem
Consider the Small Element δs on the Boundary C
sysx cos,sin
xpspY
ypspX
sin
costhen
p = Normal Pressure to δs
The Total Force on the Body is given by
CC
ydixdpixdiydpYiX
Use Bernoulli’s Theorem .2
1 2constUp
U∞ = Air Velocity far from Body
x
y
xy
sd
M
X
Y
137
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
1911Blasius Theorem
Proof of Blasius Theorem (continue – 1)
C
ydixdUconstiYiX 2
2
1
but 00 CCC
ydixdconstydxd
yduivuxduivvdyixdviu
dyuixdvdyixdvu
dyvuidyixdvudyixdvudyixdU
22
22
2
2
2222
2222222
viuU and
x
y
xy
sd
M
X
Y
138
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
1911Blasius Theorem
Proof of Blasius Theorem (continue – 2)
CC
zdzd
wdiydixdU
iYiX
22
22
zdzd
wddyixdviudyixdU
2
22
00 xdvyduviuydixdUsd
Since the Flow around C is on a Streamline defined by
therefore yduivuxduivv 22
yixz
yxiyxzw
,,:
and
xyv
yxu
,where
Completes the Proof for the Force Equation
viuzd
wd
x
y
xy
sd
M
X
Y
139
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
1911Blasius Theorem
Proof of Blasius Theorem (continue – 3)
ydxixdyiydyxdxvuivudyixdviuyixzdzd
wdz
2222
2
The Moment around the point z=0 is defined by
CC
ydyxdxUydyxdxpM2
2
since 2
2 UconstpBernoulli
and 0C
ydyxdxconst
hence xdyydxvuydyxdxvuzd
zd
wdz
222
2
Re
x
y
xy
sd
M
X
Y
140
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius(1883 – 1970)
Blasius was a PhD Student of Prandtl at Götingen University
C
C
zdzd
wdzM
zdzd
wdiiYX
2
2
2
2
Re
1911Blasius Theorem
Proof of Blasius Theorem (continue – 4)
CCC
zdzd
wdzydyxdxvuydyxdxpM
2
22
22
Re
hence
xdyydxvuydyxdxvuzdzd
wdz
222
2
Re
Since the Flow around C is on a Streamline we found that u dy = v dx
ydyuxdxvxdvyuyduxvxdyydxvu 22 22222
ydyxdxvuzdzd
wdz
22
2
2Re
Completes the Proof for the Moment Equation
x
y
xy
sd
M
X
Y
141
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowBlasius Theorem Example
Circular Cylinder with Circulation
Let apply Blasius Theorem
Assume a Cylinder of Radius a in a Flow of Velocity U∞ at an Angle of Attack αand Circulation Γ.The Flow is simulated by:-A Uniform Stream of Velocity U∞
-A Doublet of Strength U∞ a2.-A Vortex of Strength Γ at the origin.
Since the Closed Loop Integral is nonzero only for 1/z component, we have
viuz
i
z
eaUeU
zd
wd ii
22
2
C
ii
C
zdz
i
z
eaUeU
izd
zd
wdiYiX
2
2
22
222
ii
C
i
eUiz
eUResiduezd
z
eUiiYiX
22
02
zenclosesCif
z
AResidueAizd
z
A
C
where we used:
X
YL
U
x
y
i
ii ez
i
ez
aUezUzw
ln2
2
142
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowBlasius Theorem Example
Circular Cylinder with Circulation (continue – 1)
C
ii
C
zdz
i
z
eaUeUzzd
zd
wdzM
2
2
22
222
ReRe
Since the Closed Loop Integral is nonzero only for 1/z component, we have
0'10
012
zenclosendoesCornif
zenclosesCandnifz
AResidueAi
zdz
A
Cn
we used:
04
2224
2
2 2
222
2
222
aUizdzz
aUM
C
ReRe
ieUiYiX
UL
DUieYiXiLD i
0
:
X
YL
U
x
y
Zero Moment around the Origin.
143
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowBlasius Theorem Example
Circular Cylinder with Circulation (continue – 2)
On the Cylinder z = a e iθ
We found: viuz
i
z
eaUeU
zd
wd ii
22
2
aUi
a
ieeUeeUe
zd
Wdeviuviv iiiiii
r
2sin2
2
Stagnation Points are the Points on the Cylinder for which vθ = 0:
02
sin2
aUv
Uastagnation
4sin 1
144
The Flow Pattern Around a Spinning Cylinderwith Different Circulations Γ Strengths
2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
145
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowBlasius Theorem Example
Circular Cylinder with Circulation (continue – 3)
The Pressure Coefficient on the Cylinder Surface is given by:
2
2
2
22
2
2sin2
11
21
U
aU
U
vv
U
ppC rSurface
Surfacep
Using Bernoulli’s Law:
22
2
1
2
1 UpUp SurfaceSurface
UaUaC
Surfacep
4sin8
44sin41
2
2
146
2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
147
SOLO
Stream Lines
Flow Around a Cylinder
Streak Lines (α = 0º)
Preasure Field
Streak Lines (α = 5º)
Streak Lines (α = 10º) Forces in the Body
http://www.diam.unige.it/~irro/cilindro_e.html
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
148
SOLO
Velocity Field
http://www.diam.unige.it/~irro/cilindro_e.html
University of Genua, Faculty of Engineering,
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
Return to Table of Content
149
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
C
'C
''C '''C
Corollary to Blasius Theorem
'
22
'
22
22
22
CC
CC
zdzd
wdzzd
zd
wdzM
zdzd
wdizd
zd
wdiiYX
ReRe
C – Two Dimensional Curve defining Body BoundaryC’ – Any Other Two Dimensional Curve inclosing C such that No Singularity exist between C and C’
Proof of Corollary to Blasius Theorem
Add two Close Paths C” and C”’ , connecting C and C’, in opposite direction, s.t.
''''' CC
then, since there are No Singularities between C and C’, according to Cauchy:
0'
0
'''''
CCCC
q.e.d.
'CC
therefore
150
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
151
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
AERODYNAMICSSubsonic Incompressible Flow (ρ∞ = const.) about Wings of Infinite Span (AR = ∞)
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
152
Kutta Condition
We want to obtain an analogy between a Flow around an Airfoil and that around a Spinning Cylinder. For the Spinning Cylinder we have seen that when a Vortex isSuperimposed with a Doublet on an Uniform Flow, a Lifting Flow is generated.The Doublet and Uniform Flow don’t generate Lift. The generation of Lift is alwaysassociated with Circulation. Suppose that is possible to use Vortices to generate Circulation, and thereforeLift, for the Flow around an Airfoil. • Figure (a) shows the pure non-circulatory Flow around an Airfoil at an Angle of Attack. We can see the Fore SF and Aft SA Stagnation Points.•Figure (b) shows a Flow with a Small Circulation added. The Aft Stagnation Point Remains on the Upper Surface.•Figure (c) shows a Flow with Higher Circulation, so that the Aft Stagnation Point moves to Lower Surface. The Flow has to pass around the Trailing Edge. For an Inviscid Flow this implies an Infinite Speed at the Trailing Edge.•Figure (d) shows the only possible position for the Aft Stagnation Point, on the Trailing Edge. This is the Kutta Condition, introduced by Wilhelm Kutta in 1902, “Lift Forces in Flowing Fluids” (German), Ill. Aeronaut. Mitt. 6, 133.
Martin Wilhelm Kutta
(1867 – 1944)
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
1902
SOLO
Definition: A Stagnation Point is a point in a flow field where the local velocity of the fluid is zero
153
Effect of Circulation on the Flow around an Airfoil at an Angle of Attack
2-D Inviscid Incompressible FlowSOLO
Definition: A Stagnation Point is a point in a flow field where the local velocity of the fluid is zero
SF – Forward Stagnation Point SA – Aft Stagnation Point
Kutta Condition:SA on the Trailing Edge
Return to Table of Content
154
Martin Wilhelm Kutta (1867 – 1944)
Nikolay Yegorovich Joukovsky (1847-1921
Kutta-Joukovsky Theorem
The Kutta–Joukowsky Theorem is a Fundamental Theorem of Aerodynamics. The theorem relates the Lift generated by a right cylinder to the speed of the cylinder through the fluid, the density of the fluid, and the Circulation. The Circulation is defined as the line integral, around a closed loop enclosing the cylinder or airfoil, of the component of the velocity of the fluid tangent to the loop. The magnitude and direction of the fluid velocity change along the path.
The force per unit length acting on a right cylinder of any cross section whatsoever is equal to ρ∞V ∞Γ, and is perpendicular to the direction of V ∞.
Kutta–Joukowsky Theorem:
2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
19061902
UL Kutta–Joukowsky Theorem:
LCUL 2
2
1 Lift:
Kutta in 1902 and Joukowsky in 1906, independently, arrived to this result.
Circulation cos: ldVldV
SOLO
155
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
General Proof of Kutta-Joukovsky TheoremUsing the Corollary to Blasius Theorem
Suppose that we wish to determine theAerodynamic Force on a Body of Any Shape.Use Corollary to Blasius Theorem, integratingRound a Circle Contour with a Large Radius andCenter on the Body
zi
z
aUzUzw ln
2
2
The proof is identical to development in the Example ofFlow around a Two Dimensional Cylinder using
According to Corollary to Blasius Theorem we use C’ instead of C for Integration
z
i
z
aUU
zd
wd 1
22
2
LiftiDragUiUi
ii
z
UiResidue
i
zdz
Uiizd
z
i
z
aUU
izd
zd
wdizd
zd
wdiiYX
CCCC
22
1
2
1
2
1
2222 ''
2
2
2
'
22
Therefore 0& DragULLift q.e.d.
02
zenclosesCif
z
AResidueAizd
z
A
C
where we used:
C
'C
UL
D
156
SOLO 2-D Inviscid Incompressible Flow
D’Alembert Paradox
The fact that the Inviscid Flow Theories give Drag = 0 is called D’Alembert Paradox.
In 1768 d’Alembert enunciated his famous paradox in the following words:
“Thus I do not see, I admit, how one can satisfactorily explain by theory the resistance of fluids. On the contrary, it seems to me that the theory, developed in all possible rigor, gives, at least in several cases, a strictly vanishing resistance; a singular paradox which I leave to future geometers for elucidation.”
Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert
(1717 – 1783)
The resistance (Drag) experienced by a Real Airfoil is do to a combination of Skin-Friction and Pressure Distribution Distortions due to displacements effects of its Boundary Layers, which are not considered in the Inviscid Flow Theories.
157
The Kutta-Joukowsky Theory can be used to design Wings of Infinite Span that flow at Subsonic Speeds (Incompressible Flows). The design methods for such wings are called methods of “Profile Theory”.
AERODYNAMICS
Subsonic Incompressible Flow (ρ∞ = const.) about Wings of Infinite Span (AR = ∞)
Profile (of Airfoil) Theory can be treated in two different ways:
1.Conformal Mapping This Method is limited to 2 – dimensional problems. The Flow about a given body is obtained by using Conformal Mapping to transform it into a known Flow about another body (usually Circular Cylinder)
2.Method of Singularities The body in the Flow Field is substitute by Sources, Sinks, and Vortices, the so called Singularities.
For practical purposes the Method of Singularities is much simpler than Conformal Mapping. But, the Method of Singularities produces, in general, only ApproximateSolution, whereas Conformal Mapping leads to Exact Solutions, although these often require considerable effort.
SOLO
Return to Table of Content
158
Joukovsky Airfoils
Joukovsky transform, named after Nikolai Joukovsky is a conformal map historically used to understand some principles of airfoil design.
Nikolay Yegorovich Joukovsky (1847-1921
Profile Theory Using Conformal Mapping
It is applied on a Circle of Radius R and Center at cx, cy. The radius to the Point (a,0) make an angle β to x axis. Velocity U∞ makes an angle αwith x axis.
xcyc
U
R
x
y
0,a
The transform isz
az
2
sincosˆ RiRacicc yx For α=0 we have
czi
cz
RczUzw ˆln
2ˆˆ
2
For any α we have
cezi
cez
RcezUzw i
ii ˆln
2ˆˆ
2
AERODYNAMICSSOLO
159
Kutta-Joukovsky
Nikolay Yegorovich Joukovsky (1847-1921
cezi
cez
RcezUzw i
ii ˆln
2ˆˆ
2
viucez
i
cez
RUe
zd
wdii
i
ˆ1
2ˆ1 2
2
we have
Kutta Condition: The Flow Leaves Smoothly from the Trailing Edge.This is an Empirical Observation that results from the tendency ofViscous Boundary Layer to Separate at Trailing Edge.
Martin Wilhelm Kutta (1867 – 1944)
yxi
ii
i
azaz
caBcaABiA
i
BiA
RUe
cea
i
cea
RUe
zd
wdivu
sin:,cos:1
21
ˆ1
2ˆ10
2
2
2
2
222
22222222222
22
2
BA
BAAURBAiBABBARBAU
e i
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
Return to Table of Content
160
we have
222
22222222222
22
20
BA
BAAURBAiBABBARBAU
ezd
wd i
az
sinsinsin:,coscoscos: RacaBRaacaA yx
222
2222
coscos2cos12
sinsincoscos
RRaRa
RaaRaBA
2
20 222 BAAURBA sinsin444
22
2
RaUUBUBBA
R
0
22
22222222222
2222222222222222
RBABAUBARBAU
URBBARBAUBABBARBAU
Let check
For this value of Γ, we have
This value of Γ satisfies the Kutta Condition0
azzd
wd
Joukovsky Airfoils
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
161
Joukovsky Airfoils Design1. Move the Circle to ĉ and choose Radius R so that the Circle
passes through z = a.
Nikolay Yegorovich Joukovsky (1847-1921
xcyc
U
R
x
y
0,a
for Center at z = 0. zi
z
RzUzW ln
2
2
2. Change z-ĉ → z
czi
cz
RczUzW ˆln
2ˆˆ
2
3. Change z → z e-iα
cezi
cez
RcezUzW i
ii ˆln
2ˆˆ
2
4. Compute Γ from Kutta Condition
azazd
Wd
d
Wd
2
0
sin4ˆ
RUac
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
162
Joukovsky Airfoils Design (continue – 1)
5. Use the Transformation and computez
az
2
22 /1
//
za
zdWd
zd
d
zd
Wd
d
Wd
6. To Compute Lift use either:
sin4 2RUUL6.1 Kutta-Joukovsky
6.2 Blasius
d
d
WdieFiFeLi i
yxi
2
2''
6.3 Bernoulli
2
2/1
2/
U
zdWd
U
ppC p
a
a
p
a
a
p
a
a
Upp
a
a
Low xdCxdCU
xdpxdpLUL
2
2
2
2
22
2
2
2
''cos
2/''
cos
1
sin2sin82/ 42
cR
acL c
R
Uc
LC
'yF
'xF 'xF
U 'x
L
plane
'y
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
163
Joukovsky Airfoils Design (continue – 2)
7. To compute Pitching Moment about Origin use either:
7.2 Blasius
dd
WdiM p
2
20Re
7.1 Bernoulli
a
a
p
a
a
p
a
a
Upp
a
a
Low
SpanUnitper
p
xdxCxdxCU
xdxpxdxpM
UL
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
''''2
''''0
'yF
'xF 'xF
U 'x
L
plane
'y
0pM
2sin4
222
0aUM p
22
20
a
R
a
L
Mx p
p
sin4 2RUL
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
164
Joukovsky Airfoils Design (continue – 3)
8. To Pitching Moment about Any Point x0 is given by:
Lmpp C
c
xCcULxMM
x
0220 000 2
'yF
'xF 'xF
U 'x
L
plane
'y
0pM0x 2sin4 22
0aCc m
sin2LC
a
xaU
c
x
c
acUM
ac
px
0221
4
02
222
882
sin22sin420
a
x
a
xaUM
acpx
00221
418
20
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
165Generation of Joukowsky Profiles through Conformal Mapping
Symmetric Joukowsky Profile
Circular Joukowsky Profile
Cambered Joukowsky Profile
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
166
Profile Theory Using Conformal Mapping
AERODYNAMICSSOLO
167
Nikolay Yegorovich Joukovsky (1847-1921
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
168
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
169
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
170
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
171
Profile Theory Using Conformal MappingAERODYNAMICSSOLO
Return to Table of Content
172
SOLO
SubsonicV < a
a t
V t
Soundwaves
- when the source moves at subsonic velocity V < a, it will stay inside the family of spherical sound waves.
a
VM
M
&
1sin 1
SupersonicV > a
a t
V t
M
1sin 1
Soundwaves
Machwaves
Disturbances in a fluid propagate by molecular collision, at the sped of sound a,along a spherical surface centered at the disturbances source position.
The source of disturbances moves with the velocity V.
- when the source moves at supersonic velocity V > a, it will stay outside the family of spherical sound waves. These wave fronts form a disturbance envelope given by two lines tangent to the family of spherical sound waves. Those lines are called Mach waves, and form an angle μ with the disturbance source velocity:
SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
173
SOLO SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
M < 1
M = 1
M > 1
Mach Waves
174
SOUND WAVESSOLO
Sound Wave Definition: p
p
p p
p1
2 1
1
1
2 1
2 1
2 1
p p p
h h h
For weak shocks
up
1
2
11
11
1
11
11
2
12
1
1uuuuuu
)C.M.(
ppuuupuupu
11
111122111
211
)C.L.M.(
21
au 1
1p
1
1T
1e
112 uuu
112 ppp
112
112 TTT
112 eee
SOUND
WAVE
Since the changes within the sound wave are small, the flow gradients are small.Therefore the dissipative effects of friction and thermal conduction are negligibleand since no heat is added the sound wave is isotropic. Since
au 1
s
pa
2valid for all gases
175
SPEED OF SOUND AND MACH NUMBERSOLO
21
au 1
1p
1
1T
1e
112 uuu
112 ppp
112
112 TTT
112 eee
SOUNDWAVE
Speed of Sound is given by
0
ds
pa
RTp
C
C
T
dT
R
C
pT
dT
R
C
d
dp
dR
T
dTCds
p
dpR
T
dTCds
v
p
v
p
dsv
p
00
0
but for an ideal, calorically perfect gas
pRTa
TChPerfectyCaloricall
RTpIdeal
p
The Mach Number is defined asRT
u
a
uM
1
2
1
1
111
a
a
T
T
p
pThe Isentropic Chain:
a
ad
T
Tdd
p
pdsd
1
2
10
176
SOLO
12
12
11 M
12 MM
12 pp
12 TT
Concave Corner
When a supersonic flow encounters a boundary the following will happen:
When a flow encounters a boundary it must satisfy the boundary conditions,meaning that the flow must be parallel to the surface at the boundary.
- when the supersonic flow, in order to remain parallel to the boundary surface, must “turn into itself” (see the Concave Corner example) a Oblique Shock will occur. After the shock wave the pressure, temperature and density will increase. The Mach number of the flow will decrease after the shock wave.
SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
1
2
12
11 M
12 MM
12 pp
12 TT
Convex Corner
- when the supersonic flow, in order to remain parallel to the boundary surface, must “turn away from itself” (see the Convex Corner example) an Expansion wave will occur. In this case the pressure, temperature and density will decrease. The Mach number of the flow will increase after the expansion wave.
Return to Table of Content
177
SHOCK WAVESSOLO
A shock wave occurs when a supersonic flow decelerates in response to a sharpincrease in pressure (supersonic compression) or when a supersonic flow encountersa sudden, compressive change in direction (the presence of an obstacle).
For the flow conditions where the gas is a continuum, the shock wave is a narrow region(on the order of several molecular mean free paths thick, ~ 6 x 10-6 cm) across which isan almost instantaneous change in the values of the flow parameters.
Shock Wave Definition (from John J. Bertin/ Michael L. Smith, “Aerodynamics for Engineers”, Prentice Hall, 1979, pp.254-255)
When the shock wave is normal to the streamlines it is called a Normal Shock Wave,
otherwise it is an Oblique Shock Wave.
The difference between a Shock Wave and a Mach Wave is that:
- A Mach Wave represents a surface across which some derivative of the flow variables (such as the thermodynamic properties of the fluid and the flow velocity) may be discontinuous while the variables themselves are continuous. For this reason we call it a Weak Shock.
- A Shock Wave represents a surface across which the thermodynamic properties and the flow velocity are essentially discontinuous. For this reason it is called a Strong Shock.
178
Normal Shock Wave Over a Blunt Body
Normal Shock Wave
SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Oblique Shock Wave
Oblique Shock Wave Return to Table of Content
179
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Conservation of Mass (C.M.) 1 1 2 2u u
2
1
1
2
u
u
Conservation of Linear Momentum (C.L.M.) 22221
211 pupu p
p
up
2
1
12
1
1
1 1
H H h u h u1 2 1 12
2 221
2
1
2 h
h
u
h2
1
12
12
12
11
Conservation of Energy (C.E.)
Field Equations
Constitutive Relations
p R TIdeal Gas
e e T C Tv
1 2(1) Thermally Perfect Gas (2) Calorically Perfect Gas
pp
CC
CC
p
R
CTC
peh
v
p
vp CC
v
p
v
pCCR
pTRp
p 11
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
180
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
First Way
h
h
p
pp
p
p
p
u
h
up
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
12
12
12
1
1
2
1
1
11
21
11
21
11
or
p
p
up
up
C L M2
1
12
1
1
12
1
1
2
11 1
11
21
11
( . . .)
after further development we obtain
1 21
11
11
1
201
2
1
1
212
1
1
12
1
1
up
up
up
Solving for 1/η , we obtain
1
1 1 21
11
2
11
2
2
1
12
1
1
12
1
1
2
12
1
1
12
1
1
u
u
up
up
up
up
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
181
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
We obtain an other relation in the following way:
p
p
up
p
p
up
p
pp
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
pp
p
2
1
12
1
1
2
2
1
12
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
11
1
21
1
1 1
11
1
1
21
1
1 1
2
1
21
1
21
1
2
1
21
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
11
1
1
u
u
p
pp
p
p
p
T
T
or
Rankine-Hugoniot Equation
Rankine-Hugoniot Equation (1)
William John MacquornRankine
(1820-1872)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
Pierre-Henri Hugoniot(1851 – 1887)
182
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
11
1
1
u
u
p
pp
p
p
p
T
T Rankine-Hugoniot Equation
Rankine-Hugoniot Equation (2)
p
p2
1
2
1
2
1
1
11
1
1
T
T
p
p
p
p
p
pp
p
p
p
pp
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
11
11
1
11
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
p2p1
21
Normal Shock WaveRankine-Hugoniot
Isentropicp2
p1
21
( )=
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
183
Rankine-Hugoniot Equation (3)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
SOLO
184
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Strong Shock Wave Definition:p
p
u
u
T
T
p
p
R H R H2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Weak Shock Wave Definition: p
p
p p
p1
2 1
1
1
2 1
2 1
2 1
p p p
h h h
For weak shocks
up
1
2
h u
1
2
1
u u u u u u21
2
11
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
(C.M.)
1 1
2
1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1
1
1 1u p u u p u u u p p
(C.L.M.)
ordernd
uuuhhuuhhuhuh
2
4
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1 21
2
1
21
1
211
2
11
11222
211
(C.E.)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
185
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Second Wayh h u h u0 1 1
22 2
21
2
1
2 Define
210
1
121
1
10
220
2
222
2
20
11
2
1
1
11
2
1
1
uhp
up
h
uhp
up
h
u u h1 2 021
1
Prandtl’s Relation
u hu
u
u
p
p
up2 0
1
2 11
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
21
1
11 1
From this relation, we obtain:
Prandtl’s Relation
Ludwig Prandtl(1875-1953)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
(C.M.)(C.L.M.)
p
h1
and use
1222
2
11
1
2211
22221
211 11
uuu
p
u
p
uu
pupu
122121
0 2
1
2
1111uuuu
uuh
2
11
112
21
120 uu
uu
uuh
186
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
(C.M.)
Hugoniot Equation
1 1 2 2 2 1
1
2
u u u u
1 1
2
1 2 2
2
2 21
2
2
1
2
2 2 1 1
2
11
2
2
1
2 1
2
2 1
1
2 2 1
2
22
2 2 1
2
1
2
2 11
2
2 11
2
u p u p u p p p u u
up p
up p
u u
u u
(C.L.M.)
h u h u ep p p
ep p p
e ep p p p p p p p
e ep p
h ep
1 1
2
2 2
2
11
1
2 1
2 1
22
2
2
2 1
2 1
1
2
2 12 1
2 1
2 1
2
1
1
2
2
2 1
2 1
2
2
1
2
1 2
1 2 2 1
2
2 1
2 1 1 2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2 2
2
2 2
2
2
1 2 2
1 2
2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2
1 2
2 1
2 1 2 1 1 2
1 2
p p p p p p p p
e ep p p p
(C.E.)
e ep p
2 11 2
2 12
1 1
Hugoniot Equation
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
187
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Fanno’s Line for a Perfect Gas (1) 1 1 1 2 2 u u
m
A
frictionpupu 22221
2112
31
2
1
21 1
2
2 2
2C T u C T u h C Tp p p
4 1 1 1 2 2 2p R T p R T
5 2 12
1
2
1
s s CT
TR
p
pp ln ln
(C.M.)
(C.L.M.)
(C.E.)
Ideal Gas
p
p
T
T
u
u
h C T
h C T
p
p
T
T
h C T
h C T
s s CT
TR
T
T
h C T
h C T
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
2
1
42
1
2
1
2
1
11
2
30 1
0 2
2
1
2
1
0 1
0 2
2 12
1
2
1
0 1
0 2
5
( )
( ) ( )
ln ln
Assume that all the conditionsof the model are satisfied except the moment equation (2)(a flow with friction)
Using , we obtainh C Tp
ss
1s
2smax
h1
h2
h2
1s s C
h
hR
h
h
h h
h hp2 1
2
1
2
1
0 1
0 2
ln ln
Fanno’s Line for a Perfect Gas
This is the Adiabatic, Constant Area Flow.
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
Gino Girolamo Fanno(1888 – 1962)
188
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Fanno’s Line for a Perfect Gas (2)
ss
1s
2smax
h1
h2
h2
1
We have a point of maximum entropy. Let see the significance of this point
dp
dhdp
dhdsT 0max
Gibbs
u
duddudu
0(C.M.)
duudhu
hd
0
2
2(C.E.)
Therefore)4..(
0
.).(
000
EC
ds
MC
dsdsds u
du
d
dpd
d
dpdpdh
0
0
ds
ds d
dpu
or
ds CdT
TR
dp
p
ds CdT
TR
d
C
C
dp
p
d
dp
d p
dp
d
pR T
p
v
p
v
ds
ds
ds ds
p R T
max
max
0
0
0
0
0 0
We have:
udp
dR T a speed of soundds
ds
0
0
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
189
Ideal Gas
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Rayleigh’s Line for a Perfect Gas (1)
A
muu
22111
2 1 12
1 2 22
2 u p u p
QhuTCuTC pp 222
211 2
1
2
13
4 1 1 1 2 2 2p R T p R T
5 2 12
1
2
1
s s CT
TR
p
pp ln ln
(C.M.)
(C.L.M.)
(C.E.)
Assume that all the conditionsof the model are satisfied except the energy equation (3)(a flow with heating and cooling)
Let substitute in (5) , to obtainh C Tp
Rayleigh’s Line for a Perfect GasThis is the Frictionless, Constant Area Flow, with Cooling and Heating.
smax
s
s1
s2
h1
h2
h
M>1
M<1Rayleigh2
1
Heating
Heating
Cooling
m
A
R T
pp
m
A
R T
pp
x
p1
11
2
22
1
21
121
11
212
111
212
&12
1
lnln5
p
R
A
mc
p
TR
A
mb
hC
abbR
h
hCss
pp
We want to find xp
p 2
1
. Let multiply the result byx
p1
xm
A
R T
p
b
xm
A
R
pc
T2 1
12
1
12
1
21
2
0
or
xp
pb b a T 2
1
1 12
1 2The solution is:
John William Strutt
Lord Rayleigh
(1842-1919)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
190
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Rayleigh’s Line for a Perfect Gas (2)
We have a point of maximum entropy. Let see the significance of this point
u
duddudu
0(C.M.)
(C.L.M.)
A Normal Shock Wave must be on both Fanno and Rayleigh Lines, thereforethe end points of a Normal Shock Wave must be on the intersection of Fanno and Rayleigh Lines
udp
dR T a speed of soundds
ds
0
0
d p udp
duu
1
202
dp
d
dp
du
du
du
uu
2
ss
1s
2
h1
h2
h
M>1
M<1
Rayleigh
Fanno
2
1
SHOCK
According to the Second Law of Thermodynamicsthe Entropy must increase. Therefore a Normal ShockWave from state (1) to state (2) must be such thats2 > s1. (from supersonic to subsonic flow only)
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
191
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Mach Number Relations (1)
C M u u
C L M u p u p
p
u
p
uu u
C Ea
h
ua
h
ua a u
a a u
ap
. .
. . .
. .
1 1 2 2
1 12
1 2 22
2
1
1 1
2
2 22 1
12
1
12 2
2
2
22
12 2
12
22 2
22
41
1
2 1
1
2
1
2
1
21
2
1
2
a
u
a
uu u1
2
1
22
22 1
Field Equations:
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
21
1
2
1
2
2
11
2
22 2 1
2 1
1 2
22 1 2 1
2
1 2
a
uu
a
uu u u
u u
u ua u u u u
a
u u
u u a1 22
u
a
u
aM M1 2
1 21 1
Prandtl’s Relation
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
Ludwig Prandtl(1875-1953)
192
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Mach Number Relations (2)
M
MM
M
M
M
M
MM
22
22
1
12
12
12
12
12
21
1
2
1 1
2
11
1 21
2 1 2
1 1 1 1 1
12
or
M
M
M
M
MH H
A A
2
12
12
12
121 2
1 21
1
21
2
2
1
11
2
12
11
2
1
1
2
12
1 2
12
2 12 1
2
12
1 2 1
1 2
A A u
u
u
u u
u
aM
M
M
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
193
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Mach Number Relations (3)
p
p
up
u
u
u
a
MM
MM
M M
M
2
1
12
1
1
2
1
12
12
1
2
12 1
2
12 1
2 12
12
12
1 1 1 1
1 11 2
11
1 1 2
1
or
(C.L.M.)
p
pM2
1121
2
11
h
h
T
T
p
pM
M
M
a
a
h C T p R Tp2
1
2
1
2
1
1
212 1
2
12
2
1
12
11
1 2
1
s s
R
T
T
p
pM
M
M2 1 2
1
12
1
1
12
1
112
12
1
12
11
1 2
1
ln ln
s s
RM M
M2 1
1 1
2 12 3
2
2 12 41
2 2
3 11
2
11
Shapiro p.125
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
194
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Mach Number Relations (4)
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
M
MM02
01
02
2
1
01
2
1
22
12
1
12
11
2
11
2
12
11
11
21
1
2
11
21
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
21
2
11
1
2
12
11
22
12
12
12
2
12
12
12
12
MM
M
M M
M
M
M
p
p
M
MM02
01
12
12
1
12
1
1
1
2
12
11
12
11
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
195
NORMAL SHOCK WAVESSOLO
Normal Shock Wave ( Adiabatic), Perfect Gas
G Q 0 0,
Mach Number Relations (5)
s s
R
T
T
p
p
p
p
MM
M
T T2 1 02
01
102
01
1
02
01
12
12
12
02 01
1
11
2
11
1
1
2
11
2
ln ln
ln ln
s
s1
s2
T
M>1
M<1Rayleigh
Fanno
2
1
SHOCK
T2
T1
T02
T01=
T2T1=* *
p2
p1
p01
p02
Mollier’s Diagram
u
p
T
e
u
p
T
e
11
q
Q
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
John William Strutt
Lord Rayleigh
(1842-1919)
Gino Girolamo Fanno(1888 – 1962)
Return to Table of Content
196
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVESSOLO
11, MV
1
2
1V
a bcd
f e
n1
t1
twnuV
twnuV
11
11
222
111
Continuity Eq.: 2211 uu
21222111 ppuuuu
Moment Eq. Tangential Component: 0222111 wuwu
Moment Eq. Normal Component:
Energy Eq.: 22
22
22
211
21
21
1 22u
wuhu
wuh
Continuity Eq.: 2211 uu
Moment Eq.:21 ww
2222
2111 upup
Energy Eq.:22
22
2
21
1
uh
uh
Summary
Calorically Perfect Gas:Tch
TRp
p
6 Equations with 6 Unknowns
222222 ,,,,, hwuTp
197
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVESSOLO
For a calorically Perfect Gas
2
1
1
2
1
2
21
212
2
21
1
2
21
21
1
2
11/2
1/2
11
21
21
1
p
p
T
T
M
MM
Mp
p
M
M
n
nn
n
n
n
sin11 MM n
sin2
2nM
M
Now we can compute
tantan1tan
tantan
tan
tan
sin1
sin12
tan
tan
tan
tan
221
221
2
1
1
2
12
2
2
1
1
M
M
u
u
ww
w
u
w
u
11, MV
1
2
1V
a bcd
f e
n1
t1
198
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVESSOLO
11, MV
2,2
MV
1
1, tM
w 1
1 ,n
Mu
2
2, tM
w2
2 ,nM
u
1
2
1V 2V
Oblique S
hocka b
cd
f e
22cos
1sincot2tan 2
1
221
M
M
M,, relation
12 M
12 M
.5max Mfor
1M 2M
Strong Shock
Weak Shock
199
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVESSOLO
1. For any given M1 there is a maximum deflection angle θmax
If the physical geometry is such that θ > θmax, then no solution exists for straight oblique shock wave. Instead the shock will be curved and detached.
11 M
11 M
11 M
11 M
max
max max
max
Wedge
Corner Flow
200
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVESSOLO
2. For any given θ < θmax, there are two values of β predicted by the θ-β-M relation for a given Mach number.
WEAK
STRONG
22cos
1sincot2tan 2
1
221
M
M
M,, relation
11 Mmax
Weak and Strong Shocks
- the large value of β is called the strong shock solution
In nature the weak shock solution usually occurs.
- the small value of β is called the weak shock solution
- in the strong shock solution M2 is subsonic (M2 < 1)
- in the weak shock M2 solution is supersonic (M2 > 1)
201
22cos
1sincot2tan
2
1
22
1
M
M
M,, relation
SOLO OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
4.1
max
11 Mmax
Weak and Strong Shocks
202
sin
11/2
1/2
sin
22
21
212
2
11
n
n
nn
n
MM
M
MM
MM
SOLO
max
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
11 Mmax
Weak and Strong Shocks
Mach Number in Back of Oblique Shock M2 as a Function of the Mach Numberin Front of the Shock M1, for Different Values of Deflection Angle θ (γ=1.4)
203
11
21
sin
21
1
2
11
n
n
Mp
p
MM
SOLO
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
Static Pressure Ratio P2/P1
as a Function of M1 the Mach Number in Front of an Oblique Shock, for Different Values of Deflection Angle θ (γ=1.4)
204
SOLO
OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
Stagnation Pressure Ratio P20/P1
0 as a Function of M1 the Mach Number in Front of an Oblique Shock, for Different Values of Deflection Angle θ (γ=1.4)
11 Mmax
Weak and Strong Shocks
Return to Table of Content
205
SOLO OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves
1
2
12
11 M
12 MM
12 pp
12 TT
Convex Corner
Ludwig Prandtl(1875 – 1953)
Theodor Meyer (1882 – 1972)
The Expansion Fan depicted in Figure wasFirst analysed by Prandtl in 1907 and hisstudent Meyer in 1908.
Let start with an Infinitesimal Change across aMach Wave
Mac
h Wav
e
d
2
d
2
V
VdV
dddV
VdV
sinsincoscos
cos
2/sin
2/sin
tan
/tan1
tan1
11
VVddd
dV
Vd
1
1tan
1sin
2
1
MM
V
VdMd 12
206
SOLO OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves (continue-1)
Mac
h Wav
e
d
2
d
2
V
VdV
V
VdMd 12
Integrating this equation gives
2
1
12M
M V
VdM
Using the definition of Mach Number: V = M.a
a
ad
M
Md
V
Vd
For a Calorically Perfect Gas
20
2
0
2
11 M
T
T
a
a
MdMMa
ad1
2
2
11
2
1
M
Md
MV
Vd
2
21
1
1
2
12
2
21
1
1M
M M
Md
M
M
1
2
12
11 M
12 MM
12 pp
12 TT
Convex Corner
207
SOLO OBLIQUE SHOCK & EXPANSION WAVES
Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves (continue-2)
The integral
2
12
2
21
1
1M
M M
Md
M
M
1
2
12
11 M
12 MM
12 pp
12 TT
Convex Corner
M
Md
M
MM
2
2
21
1
1
is called the Prandtl-Meyer Function and isgiven the symbol ν. Performing the integration we obtain
1tan11
1tan
1
1 2121
MMM
Deflection Angle ν and Mach Angle μ as functions of Mach Number
M
1sin 1
Finally
12 MM
Return to Table of Content
208
Linearized Flow Equations
1. Irrotational Flow
SOLO
Assumptions
2. Homentropic
3. Thin bodies
0
u
0&0..;.t
sseieverywhereconsts
This implies also inviscid flow ~ 0
Changes in flow velocities due to body presence are small
were
- flow velocity as a function of position and time
- flow entropy as a function of position and time
tzyxu ,,,
tzyxs ,,,
209
SOLO
(C.L.M)
For an inviscid flow conservation of linear momentum gives: ~ 0
Assume that body forces are conservative and stationary
were- flow pressure as a function of position and time tzyxp ,,,- flow density as a function of position and time tzyx ,,,
Gpuuut
uuu
t
u
tD
uD
2
2
1
or
Gp
uuut
u
2
2
1 Euler’s Equation
0&
t
G
- Body forces as a function of position zyxG ,,
Leonhard Euler1707-1783
Linearized Flow Equations
210
SOLO
Let integrate the Euler’s Equation between two points (1) and (2)
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
22
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
10 rd
rdpuurdrdurdu
trd
puuuu
t
We can chose the path of integration as follows:
- along a streamline ( and are collinear; i.e.: )rd
u
0
urd
- along any path, if the flow is irrotational 0
u2
1
u
ld
to obtain: 02
1
uurd
Assuming that the flow is irrotational we can define a potential , such that:
0
u tr ,
u
Let use the identity
to obtain:
rdFtrFdconstt
,
2
1
22
1
2
2
1
2
10
p
p
pdu
t
pdudd
t
Bernoulli’s Equationfor Irrotationaland Inviscid Flow
Daniel Bernoulli1700-1782
Linearized Flow Equations
211
SOLO
For an isentropic ideal gas we have
2
2
11 a
ad
T
Tdd
p
pd
where
p
TRd
pdpa
s
2 is the square of the speed of sound
In this case
22
2
1
1
1 2ad
a
adppdRTa
RTp
and 222
1
1
1
12
2
aaadpd a
a
p
p
Using the Bernoulli’s Equation we obtain
2222
2
111 Uu
t
dpaa
p
p
2
1
22
1
2
2
1
2
10
p
p
pdu
t
pdudd
t
Bernoulli’s Equationfor Irrotationaland Inviscid Flow
Linearized Flow Equations
212
SOLO
Let use the conservation of mass (C.M.) equation
(C.M.) 0 utD
D
ortD
Du
1
Let go back to Bernoulli’s Equation
22
2
1Uu
t
pdp
p
and use the Leibnitz rule of differentiation: uxFdxuxFxd
d x
x
,,0
to obtain
1
p
p
pd
pd
d
Now we can computetD
Da
tD
D
d
pd
tD
pD
tD
pDpd
pd
dpd
tD
Dp
p
p
p
211
Therefore
2222 2
1111Uu
ttD
D
a
pd
tD
D
atD
Du
p
p
Since 0 tD
Du
tD
D
we have
22
1
2
1
2
11
2
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
22
uu
t
uu
ta
uu
tu
t
uu
ta
ut
uta
uttD
D
au
u
GOTTFRIED WILHELMvon LEIBNIZ
1646-1716
Linearized Flow Equations
213
SOLO
22
1
2
1
2
11
2
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
22
uu
t
uu
ta
uu
tu
t
uu
ta
ut
uta
uttD
D
au
u
Let substitute u
2
12
12
2
2 tta
222
2
11 U
taa
Special cases
0 Laplace’s equation
Ua (subsonic flow) we can approximate the first equation by
1
2 2
2
tuu
tuuu
we can approximate
the first equation by
01
2
2
2
ta
Wave equation
Pierre-Simon Laplace
1749-1827
Linearized Flow Equations
214
SOLO
Note
The equation
22 2
11u
tu
tau
can be written as
2
2
222
22 11
2
11
tD
D
au
tu
tau
tu
tac
c
where the subscript c on and on is intended to indicate that the velocity istreated as a constant during the second application of the operators and .
cu
2
2
tD
Dc
t / u
This equation is similar to a wave equation.
End Note
Linearized Flow Equations
215
SOLO
Let compute the local pressure coefficient: 2
2
1:
U
ppC p
We have:
12
12
11
21
2
1
2
2
2
/1
2
2
2
2
1
22
2
1
a
a
Ma
a
a
U
T
T
UTR
p
p
Up
C
aUMTRa
T
T
p
p
TRp
p
Let use the equation
222
2
11 U
taa
to compute
2
22
2
2
111 U
taa
a
Finally we obtain:
12
111
2 12
22
UtaM
C p
Linearized Flow Equations
216
SOLO
Assuming a stationary flow and neglecting the body forces :
0t
0
2
112a
222
2
1
Uaa
12
11
2 12
22
UaM
C p
u
Linearized Flow Equations
217
SOLO
1
0
332211
323121
eeeeee
eeeeee
General Coordinates 321 ,, uuu
333
222
111
111e
uhe
uhe
uh
3213
2132
1321321
332211
1Ahh
uAhh
uAhh
uhhh
eAeAeAA
Using we obtain:A
33
21
322
13
211
32
1321
2
1
uh
hh
uuh
hh
uuh
hh
uhhh
where
We have for 321321 ,,,,, uuuAuuu
Linearized Flow Equations
218
SOLO
zzyyxx 2
222
2
1
2
1
2
1111
2
1zyxzyx zyx
zzzyzyxzxz
yzzyyyxyxyxzzxyyxxxx
yzzyxzzxxyyxzzzyyyxxx 22222
2
112a
222
2
1
Uaa
012
2
22111
222
222
2
2
2
2
2
ttztzytyxtxyzzy
xzzx
xyyx
zzz
yyy
xxx
aaa
aaaaa
222222
2
11 U
taa zyx
We finally obtain
Cartesian Coordinates zuyuxu 321 ,,
Linearized Flow Equations
Return to Table of Content
219
SOLO
Cylindrical Coordinates 321 ,, uruxu
zryrxxzzyyxxR 1sin1cos1111
zryrR
zyr
Rx
x
R1cos1sin&1sin1cos&1
rR
hr
Rh
x
Rh
:&1:&1: 321
11cos1sin:
&11sin1cos:&1:
2
21
zyR
R
e
rzy
r
R
r
R
ex
x
R
x
R
e
1
0
332211
323121
eeeeee
eeeeeeWe have
Linearized Flow Equations
220
SOLO
Cylindrical Coordinates (continue – 1) 321 ,, uruxu
321321
11e
reee
re
re
x rx
2
2
22 1
rrx
322
22
3212
2
2
22
11
111
1
2
1
2
1
err
err
er
r
rrxx
rrrrxrxxrxrxxx
rx
22
2
22
2
2
2
2
1111
11
rrrrrrx
rrr
rxr
xr
rrrxx
Linearized Flow Equations
221
SOLO
Cylindrical Coordinates (continue – 2) 321 ,, uruxu
Then equation
2
12
12
2
2 ttabecomes
322
22
32
12321
22
11
11
11
2111
err
err
er
er
ee
arr
rrxx
rrrrxrx
xrxrxxxrx
ztzytyxtxttrrrxx
or
02
112
/1
1/1
111
22
222
2
22
2
22
22
2
2
2
ztzytyxtxtt
rrxxrxrx
rrrr
xxx
aa
rra
a
r
ra
r
raa
Linearized Flow Equations
222
SOLO
Cylindrical Coordinates (continue – 3) 321 ,, uruxu
becomes
222
2
11 u
taa
In cylindrical coordinates, equation
22
2
2222 1
2
11 U
raa rxt
Assuming a stationary flow and neglecting body forces
0t
0
0112
/1
1/1
111
222
2
22
2
22
22
2
2
2
rrxxrxrx
rrrr
xxx
rra
a
r
ra
r
raa
22
2
2222 1
2
1U
raa rx
Linearized Flow Equations
Return to Table of Content
223
Linearized Flow Equations SOLO
Boundary Conditions
1. Since the Small Perturbations are not considering the Boundary Layer the Flow must be parallel at the Wing Surface.
The Wing Surface S is defined by zU (x,y) – Upper Surface zL (x,y) – Lower Surface
0
S
un
n
- Normal at the Wing Surface
22
1/111
y
z
x
zzy
y
zx
x
zn UUUU
U
zwUyvxuUzwUyvxuUu 1'1'1'1'sin1'1'cos
0,,'''
UUU zyxwUx
zv
x
zuU
For Upper Surface
x
zU
x
zv
x
zuUzyxw U
onPerturbatiSmall
UUU '',,'
Therefore
Sonyxallfor
x
zUzyxw
x
zUzyxw
LL
UU
,
,,'
,,'
Section AA (enlarged)
Wake region
224
Linearized Flow Equations SOLO
Boundary Conditions (continue -1)
1. Flow must be parallel at the Wing Surface.
The Wing Surface S is defined by zU (x,y) – Upper Surface zL (x,y) – Lower Surface
Since the Small Perturbation gives Linear Equation we can divide theAirfoil in the Camber Distribution zC (x,y) and the Thickness Distribution zt (x,y) by:
Sonyxallfor
x
zUyxw
x
zUyxw
CC
tt
,
0,,'
0,,'
2/,,,
2/,,,
,,,
,,,
yxzyxzyxz
yxzyxzyxz
yxzyxzyxz
yxzyxzyxz
LUt
LUC
tCL
tCU
Because of the Linearity the complete solution can be obtained by summing theSolutions for the following Boundary Conditions
Superposition of• Angle of Attack•Camber Distribution•Thickness Distribution
Section AA (enlarged)
Wake region
Sonyxallfor
x
z
x
zUyxwyxwyxw
x
z
x
zUyxwyxwyxw
tCtCL
tCtCU
,
0,,'0,,'0,,'
0,,'0,,'0,,'
225
Linearized Flow Equations SOLO
Boundary Conditions (continue -2)
2. Disturbances Produced by the Motion must Die Out in all portion of the Field remote from the Wing and its Wake
Normally this requirement is met by making ϕ→0 when y→ ±0, z → ±0, x→-∞
Subsonic LeadingEdge Flow
Subsonic TrailingEdge Flow
Supersonic LeadingEdge Flow
Supersonic TrailingEdge Flow
3. Kutta Condition at the Trailing Edge of a Steady Subsonic Flow
There cannot be an infinite change in velocity at the Trailing Edge. If the Trailing Edge has a non-zero angle, the flow velocity there must be zero. At a cusped Trailing Edge, however, the velocity can be non-zero although it must still be identical above and below the airfoil. Another formulation is that the pressure must be continuous at the Trailing Edge.
http://nylander.wordpress.com/category/engineering/
Kutta Condition does not apply to SupersonicFlow since the shape and location of theTrailing Edge exert no influence on the flow ahead.
226
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
'2uUu '1U
'
'
'2'
'
'0
''2'0
'
222
1
33
211
2222
11
ppp
aaaaaa
xU
uu
uuUUuuu
uUu
O
Small Perturbation Assumptions:
2
21 2
2
2
2
uu
t
uu
tau
(C.M.) +(C.L.M)
(C.M.) +(C.L.M)
12
1
12
1 22
22
a
Ua
ut
Bernoulli
121
a
a
T
T
p
pIsentropic Chain
Development of the Flow Equations:
Flow Equations:
'' 21 xUu
1
12
2
1
1212
2
2
'''
1
2
1
x
u
a
U
x
uuU
a
uu
a
t
uUuUU
tt
u
t
uu
'2'22 1
12
2
p
apuU
t
aU
aaauUU
t
2
1
22
2
12 ''
'0
12
1
1
'2'2
2
1'
a
a
T
T
p
p
a
ad
T
Tdd
p
pd '
1
2'
1
''
1
2
1
Isentropic Chain
Bernoulli
Linearized Flow Equations
227
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
'2uUu '1U
Small Perturbation Flow Equations:
(C.M.) +(C.L.M) 52.1&8.00''
2'1
'2
21
1
12
22
MMtt
uU
x
uU
a
''
,,,'' 321
u
xxxt
Bernoulli
''
' 1uUt
p
a
a
T
T
p
p '
1
2'
1
''
Isentropic Chain
Linearized Flow Equations
228
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Three Dimensional Flow (Thin Wings at Small Angles of Attack)
U
Upxd
ud
L
Lowxd
ud
U
x
z
0'''
12
2
2
2
2
22
zyxM
(1)
zyx ,,'(2)
zw
yv
xu
'
','
','
'
(3)
S
xd
zd
U
w
uU
w '
'
'(4)
xUuUp
'
''(5)
'
21
1
''
1
2'
1
''2
MM
M
U
uM
a
a
T
T
p
p
(6)
2
2
2
2
2
2
22 '1'2'1
'tUxtUxM
''
,,,''
u
zyxt
''
' uUt
p
Steady Three Dimensional Flow Small Perturbation Flow Equations: 0
'2
2
tt
52.1
8.00
M
M
229
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Three Dimensional Flow (Thin Wings at Small Angles of Attack)
0'''
2
2
2
2
2
22
zyx
(1)
Steady Three Dimensional Flow
Subsonic Flow M∞ < 1
01: 22 M
LowerLower
Lower
UperUper
Upper
d
zd
xd
zd
zUU
w
d
zd
xd
zd
zUU
w
'1'
'1'
3
4
3
4
Transform of Coordinates
,,,,'
1 2
zyx
z
y
Mx
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
2
''
''
1'1'
zz
yy
xx
SMdcMydycSbb 2020
11 cMyc 21
22
22
11 M
AR
SM
b
S
bAR
22 1
2
1
12
M
C
UMxUC p
p
Section AA (enlarged)
Wake region
so 02
2
2
2
2
2
Laplace’s Equation like in Incompressible Flow
Similarity Rules
230
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Three Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
incpCM 21
1
incLCM 21
1
22 1
2
1
1
Md
Cd
M inc
L
incMCM 21
1
inc0
4
1
inc
N
c
x
incMCM
021
1
incLsCM 21
1
incs
LsC
s
0MC
c
xN
MC
0
d
Cd L
LC
pCPressure Distribution
Lift
Lift Slope
Zero-Lift Angle
Pitching Moment
Neutral-Point Position
Zero Moment
Angle of Smooth Leading-Edge Flow
Lift Coefficient of Smooth Leading-Edge Flow
Aerodynamic Coefficients of a Profile in Subsonic Incident FlowBased on Subsonic Similarity Rules
231
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
U
Upxd
ud
L
Lowxd
ud
U
x
y
0''
12
2
2
22
yxM
(1)
yx,'(2)
yv
xu
'
','
'(3)
S
xd
yd
U
v
vU
v '
'
'(4)
xUuUp
'
''(5)
'
21
1
''
1
2'
1
''2
MM
M
U
uM
a
a
T
T
p
p
(6)
2
21
1
12
22 ''
2'1
'tt
uU
x
uU
a
''
,,,'' 321
u
xxxt
''
' uUt
p
Steady Two Dimensional Flow Small Perturbation Flow Equations: 0
'2
2
tt
52.1
8.00
M
M
Linearized Flow Equations
232
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
0''
2
2
2
22
yx
(1)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Subsonic Flow M∞ < 1
01: 22 M
Lower
Lower
Uper
Upper
xd
yd
yUU
v
xd
yd
yUU
v
'1'
'1'
3
4
3
4
U
Transform of Coordinates
yx
y
x
,',
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 ',
1'
11'
111'
yx
yyyy
xxxx
so 02
2
2
2
Laplace’s Equation like in Incompressible Flow
Linearized Flow Equations
233
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Subsonic Flow M∞ < 1 (continue)
The Airfoil is defined in (x,y) plane and by (ξ,η) gxfy AirfoilAirfoil
The above Transformation relates theCompressible Flow over an Airfoil in (x,y) Space to the Incompressible Flowin (ξ,η) over the same Airfoil.
Uper
Upper
xd
yd
UyUU
v 1'1'
Lower
Lower
xd
yd
UyUU
v 1'1'
yx,
x
y
Compressible Flow Incompressible Flow
Uper
Upper
xd
fd
UU
v 1'
Lower
Lower
xd
fd
UU
v 1'
Linearized Flow Equations
234
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
0'1'
2
2
22
2
yx
(1)
yxGyxGyx
yxFyxFyx
Lower
Upper
:,'
:,'(7)(8)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
01: 22 M
U
Upxd
yd
L
Lowxd
yd
U
x
y1
12
Mxd
yd
1
12
Mxd
yd
Flow
Flow
d
Fd
Uxd
yd
U
v
Uper
Upper
1
7
4'
d
Fd
xd
du Upper
73 ''
Upper
Upper xd
yd
M
Uu
1'
2
d
Gd
Uxd
yd
U
v
Lower
Lower
3
8
4'
d
Gd
xd
du Lower
83 ''
Lower
Lower xd
yd
M
Uu
1'
2
Upper
UpperUpper xd
yd
M
UuUp
1''
2
2
Lower
LowerLower xd
yd
M
UuUp
1''
2
2
Linearized Flow Equations
235
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations
S S
sdxd
ydppD sin
np
Upper
xd
yd
U
Upperxd
yd
pp
S S
sdxd
ydppL cos
S S
sdxd
ydppD
SS S
sduUsdxd
ydppL '
1 Uper
xd
yd
1 Uper
xd
yd
Kutta-Joukovsky
Define: 2
2
1:
U
ppC p
S S
p
S S
S S
p
S S
sdxd
ydCUsd
xd
yd
U
ppUL
sdxd
ydCUsd
xd
yd
U
ppUD
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
12
1
2
1
212
1
Linearized Flow Equations
236
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Subsonic Flow (M∞ < 1)
np
Upper
xd
yd
U
Upperxd
yd
pp
We found:
xd
fd
U
v'
d
gd
U
v
yxM
yM
x
,'1,
1
2
2
0''
12
2
2
22
yxM
02
2
2
2
yv
xu
'
','
'
vu ,vvM
uu
',1
'2
'' uUp uUp
xUU
u
U
ppC p
'2'2
21
':
2
UU
u
U
ppC p
22
21
:2
0
21'
M
pp
210
M
CC p
p
Compressible: Incompressible:
Linearized Flow Equations
237
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Subsonic Flow (M∞ < 1)np
Upper
xd
yd
U
Upperxd
yd
pp
The Relation:
S
p
S S
p
S S
p
S S
p
c
sdC
M
U
c
sd
xd
ydCUL
c
sd
xd
ydC
M
U
c
sd
xd
ydCUD
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
12
1
2
1
12
1
2
1
210
M
CC p
pPrandtl-Glauert
Compressibility Correction
As earlier in 1922, Prandtl is quoted as stating that the LiftCoefficient increased according to (1-M∞
2)-1/2; he mentionedthis at a Lecture at Göttingen, but without a proof. This result wasmentioned 6 years later by Jacob Ackeret, again without proof.The result was finally established by H. Glauert in 1928 based onLinear Small Perturbation.
Ludwig Prandtl(1875 – 1953)
Hermann Glauert(1892-1934)
Linearized Flow Equations Return to
Critical Mach Number
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Several improved formulas where developed:
2/11/10
0
222p
pp
CMMM
CC
Karman-Tsien
Rule
Linearized Flow Equations
0
0
2222 12/2
111 p
pp
CMMMM
CC
Laitone’sRule
Comparison of several compressibility corrections compared with experimental results for NACA 4412 Airfoil at an angle of attack of α = 1◦.
Return to Table of Content
239
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
0'1'
2
2
22
2
zx
(1)
zxFzxGzx
zxFzxFzx
Lower
Upper
:,'
:,'(7)(8)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
01: 22 M
U
Upxd
zd
L
Lowxd
zd
U
x
z1
12
Mxd
zd
1
12
Mxd
zd
Flow
Flow
d
Fd
Uxd
zd
U
w
Upper
Upper
3
7
4'
d
Fd
xd
du Upper
73 ''
d
Gd
Uxd
zd
U
w
Lower
Lower
3
8
4'
d
Gd
xd
du Lower
83 ''
Upper
Upper xd
zd
M
Uw
1'
2
Lower
Lower xd
zd
M
Uw
1'
2
Upper
UpperUpperUpper xd
zd
M
UwUppp
1''
2
2
Lower
LowerLowerLower xd
zd
M
UwUppp
1''
2
2
zw
xu
'
','
'
(3)
S
xd
zd
U
w
uU
w '
'
'(4)
240
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
U
Upxd
zd
L
Lowxd
zd
U
x
z1
12
Mxd
zd
1
12
Mxd
zd
Flow
Flow
Pressure Distribution and Lift Coefficient
21
2
2/
''22
LowerUpper
LowerUpperp xd
zd
xd
zd
MU
ppC
1
42
M
cL
00
22
1
0
1
02
1
0
1
0
001
2
1
4
21
2
LowerLowerUpperUpper
LowerUpper
ppL
zczzczMM
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
Mc
xdC
c
xdCc
LowerUpper
Upper
p xd
zd
MC
Upper
1
22
Lower
p xd
zd
MC
Lower
1
22
241
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
U
Upxd
zd
L
Lowxd
zd
U
x
z1
12
Mxd
zd
1
12
Mxd
zd
Flow
Flow
Wave Drag Coefficient
1
0
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
1
0 1
2
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
Mc
xd
xd
zdC
c
xd
xd
zdCc
UpperUpperLower
p
Upper
pD LowerUpperW
Upper
p xd
zd
MC
Upper
1
22
Lower
p xd
zd
MC
Lower
1
22
1
0
2
00
1
0
21
0
2
00
1
0
2
222
1
2
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
M Lower
zcz
LowerUpper
zcz
Upper
LowerLowerUpperUpper
22
22
2
1
2
1
4LowerUpperD
MMC
W
1
0
2
2
1
0
2
2
:
:
c
xd
xd
zd
c
xd
xd
zd
Lower
Lower
Upper
Upper
242
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
Wave Drag Coefficient
Flat Plate
0
LowerUpperxd
zd
xd
zd
Double Wedge Airfoil
1
42
2
MC
WD
022 LowerUpper
kkc
tck
c
t
kck
c
t
kcLowerUpper
14
11
14
1
4
112
2
2
2
22
2
222
cxckck
t
ckxck
t
xd
zd
cxckck
t
ckxck
t
xd
zd
LowerUpper
12
02
12
02
kk
ct
MMC
WD
1
/
1
1
1
4 2
22
2
243
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
Wave Drag Coefficient
Biconvex Airfoil
222 2/2/ ctRR
The Biconvex Airfoil is obtained by intersection of twoCircular Arcs of radius R. c – the chordt – maximum thickness at x = c/2
tcttcRtc
4/4/ 22222
tan,tanLowerUpper
xd
zd
xd
zd
22
2/2
/2
321
0
2
1
0
2
2
3
2
34
11: Lower
ct
ctUpperUpper
Upper c
t
t
cdR
cxd
xd
zd
cc
xd
xd
zd
c
t
R
c
xd
zd
MaxUpper
22/
,
2
2
22
222
22
2
3
16
1
1
1
4
1
2
1
4
c
t
MMMMC LowerUpperDW
04/13/23 244
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
Wave Drag Coefficient
Parabolic ProfileDesignation Double Wedge Profile
Contour
Side View
Wave Drag kk 13
12 kk 1
1
xckck
xcxtz
212 22
cxckxck
t
ckxxck
t
z
12
02
245
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow
Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
Wave Drag Coefficient
Wave Drag at Supersonic Incident Flow versus Relative Thickness Position
for Double Wedge and Parabolic Profiles
k
kk 1
1
kk 13
12
246
SOLO Wings in Compressible Flow
Double Wedge
Modified Double Wedge
Biconvex
2
1
2
1221
2'
2
c
t
c
tc
A
3
2
3
23321
2'
2
c
t
c
tc
tc
A
247
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Steady Two Dimensional Flow Supersonic Flow M∞ > 1
Pitching Moment CoefficientThe Pitching Moment Coefficient about theLeading Edge for any Thin Airfoil is given by
xdxxd
zd
xd
zd
Mcc
xd
c
xC
c
xd
c
xCc
c
LowerUpper
ppM LowerUpperLE
022
1
0
1
0 1
2
Thus
xdzxdzMcM
cc
Lower
c
UpperM LE 00222 1
2
1
2
xdzxdzczczcxdzzxxdzzxxdxxd
zd
xd
zd c
Lower
c
UpperLowerUpper
c
Lower
cx
xLower
c
Upper
cx
xUpper
c
LowerUpper
00
0
00000
Using integration by parts
Symmetric Airfoil zUpper = -zLower 1
22
M
cM
The distance of the Airfoil Center of Pressure aft of the Leading Edge is given by
ccM
Mc
c
c
c
x
L
MN
2
1
1/4
1/22
2
L
U
x
Return to Table of Content
248
SOLO
Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Supersonic Flow (M∞ >1)
c
xd
xd
yd
xd
yd
M
U
c
sdCUL
c
xd
xd
yd
xd
yd
M
U
c
sd
xd
ydCUD
c
LowerUpperS
p
c
LowerUpperS S
p
02
2
2
0
22
2
2
2
21
2
1
2
1
21
2
1
2
1
U
Upxd
yd
L
Lowxd
yd
U
x
y1
12
Mxd
yd
1
12
Mxd
yd
Flow
Flow
Upper
UpperUpper xd
yd
M
Uppp
1'
2
2
Lower
LowerLower xd
yd
M
Uppp
1'
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
M
xdyd
C
M
xdyd
C
Lowerp
Upper
p
Lower
Upper
We found:
This relation was first derived by Jacob Ackeret in 1925, in a paper“Luftkrafte auf Flugel, die mit groserer als Schall-geschwingigkeit bewegt werden”(“Air Forces on Wings Moving at Supersonic Speeds”), that appeared inZeitschhrift fur Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt, vol. 16, 1925, p.72
Jakob Ackeret (1898–1981)
Linearized Flow Equations
249
AERODYNAMICSSmall Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Supersonic Flow (M∞ >1)
Supersonic Flow past a Symmetric Double-Edged Airfoil
1
2
3
4
SHOCK LINE
SHOCK LINE
SHOCK LINE
SHOCK LINE
EXPANSION
EXPANSION
Using Ackeret Theory we have
1
2,
1
2
1
2,
1
2
22
22
43
21
MC
MC
MC
MC
pp
pp
1
4
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
4222
1
2/1
2/1
0 3412
MMM
c
xdCC
c
xdCC
c
sdCC pppp
S
pX
1
4
1
4
22
22 2
2/
2
0
2/
2/
0
3412
3412
MMc
tCC
c
tCC
c
t
c
ydCC
c
ydCC
c
ydCC
ct
pppp
ct pp
ct
pp
S
pX
XYXYD
XYXYL
CCCCC
CCCCC
1
1
cossin
sincos
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
2
2
2
21
2
2
2
1
MMC
MMC
D
L
250
Expansion
Shock
Shock
1M
1
2
3
4
1
22
1
Mc p
1
222
Mc p
1
224
Mc p
1
223
Mc p
cx5.0
1
pcUpper Surface
Lower Surface
Lower Surface
Upper Surface
1
42
M
CL
1
42
Md
Cd L
1
4
1
42
2
2
2
MMCD
22
D
L
22
2
2
4
1
1
4LD C
M
MC
Supersonic Flow past a Symmetric Double Wedge Aerfoil
1M
AERODYNAMICSSmall Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Supersonic Flow (M∞ >1)
251
pc
cx /
0.1
pc
cx /
0.1
pc
cx /
0.1
M
M
M
M
Expansion
ShockShock
Expansion
ExpansionShock
Expansion
Shock
Shock
Expansion
Expansion
Shock
Shock
Shock
Shock
M
M
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
42
M
c p
1
42
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
1
22
Mc p
Supersonic Flow past a Symmetric Biconvex Aerfoil
AERODYNAMICSSmall Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Two Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Drag (D) and Lift (L) Computations for Supersonic Flow (M∞ >1)
22
2
2
22
2
4
1
1
316
316
1
4
LD
L
CM
M
ct
C
ctD
L
Md
Cd
252
SOLO Linearized Flow Equations Small Perturbation Flow (Homentropic: , Isentropic ) 0~,0,0~,0 Qqsd 0
u
Applications: Three Dimensional Flow (Thin Airfoil at Small Angles of Attack)
Aerodynamic Coefficients of a Profile in Supersonic Incident FlowBased on the Linear Theory Supersonic Rules
Xd
Zd
M
1
12
1
42
M
2
1
0DC
0
0MC
c
xN
d
Cd L
pCPressure Distribution
Lift Slope
Neutral-Point Position
Zero Moment
Zero-Lift Angle 0
1
02 1
4XdZ
M
S
Wave DragL
D
Cd
Cd 14
1 2 M
1
0
22
2 1
4Xd
Xd
Zd
Xd
Zd
M
tS
253
SOLO
• Up to point A the flow is Subsonic and it follows Prandtl-Glauert Linear Subsonic Theory.
• At point B (M∞=0.81) the flow on the Upper Surface exceeds the Sound Velocity and a Shock Wave occurs. On the Lower Surface the Flow is everywhere Subsonic.
• At point C (M∞=0.89) the Flow velocity exceeds the Speed of Sound also on the Lower Surface and a Shock Wave occurs.
• At point D (M∞=0.98) the two Shock Waves on the Upper and Lower Surface (weaker than at point C) are located at the Trailing Edge. The Lift is larger than at point C.
• At point E (M∞=1.4) pure Supersonic Flow on both Surfaces.
The magnitude of Lift is given by Ackeret Theory
Transonic Flow past Airfoils
Lift Coefficient of an Airfoil versus Mach Number.Solid Line – Measurement. Dashed Lines - Theory
AERODYNAMICS
Transonic Flow over an Airfoil at various Mach Numbers; Angle of Attack α=2°.The points A,B, C, D,E correspond to the Lift Coefficients.
254
AERODYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
255Brenda B. Kulfan, “Aerodynamic of Sonic Flight”, Boeing Commercial Airplane
SOLO AERODYNAMICS
Return to Table of Content
256
SOLO
References
Air Breathing Jet Engines
William F. Hughes“Schaum’s Outline of
Fluid Dynamics”, McGraw Hill, 1999
Ascher H. Shapiro“The Dynamics and Thermodynamics
of Compressible Fluid Flow”, Wiley, 1953
John D. Anderson“Modern Compressible Flow:with Historical erspective”,
McGraw-Hill, 1982
John D. Anderson“Computational Fluid Dynamics”,
1995
Irving Herman Shames“Mechanics of Fluids”McGraw-Hill, 4th Ed,,
2003
D.Pnueli, C. Gutfinger“Fluid Mechanics”
Cambridge UniversityPress, 1997
I.H. Abbott, A.E. von Doenhoff“Theory of Wing Section”, Dover,
1949, 1959
Louis Melveille Milne-Thompson“Theoretical Aerodynamics”,
Dover, 1988Return to Table of Content
April 13, 2023 257
SOLO
TechnionIsraeli Institute of Technology
1964 – 1968 BSc EE1968 – 1971 MSc EE
Israeli Air Force1970 – 1974
RAFAELIsraeli Armament Development Authority
1974 – 2013
Stanford University1983 – 1986 PhD AA 2013 - Retired