fluid structure interaction with *mat_soft_tissue and efg elements rudolf bötticher

15
Fluid Structure Interaction with *MAT_SOFT_TISSUE and EFG elements Rudolf Bötticher www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Upload: arely-piller

Post on 12-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Fluid Structure Interaction with *MAT_SOFT_TISSUE and

EFG elements

Rudolf Bötticher

www.rudolf-boetticher.de 

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Motivation• Assess whether EFG with FSI and MMALE

is possible for *MAT_SOFT_TISSUE.• Compare the results with standard elements.• Assess whether EFG is more robust.

Result will be:

EFG is a luxury hourglass control !

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

EFG is easy!*CONTROL_EFG$ in 970 EFG and (dormant) IMPLICIT cards are not tolerated $ in the same deck$ implicit and axisymmetric EFG not implemented!

*SECTION_SOLID_EFG5,41$ the non-default bigger support helps to have consistent $ EFG simulations for *MAT_SOFT_TISSUE

1.4,1.4,1.4

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

MM-ALE is easy,if you got a working deck to refine!

*ALE_MULTI-MATERIAL_GROUP

Proceedings

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

FSI: tweaking of *CONSTRAINED_LAGRANGE_IN_SOLID

TSSFACNADV

METHCTYPE

DIRECPFACILEAK

5434a: always use the newest version for consistency and efficiency!

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

*MAT_SOFT_TISSUE

*EOS_IDEAL_GAS

AET=4

ELFORM=11

*EOS_GRUENEISENbulk modulus*MAT_NULL

outflow

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

*MAT_SOFT_TISSUE

• reinforced Mooney-Rivlin rubber

C1=C2= 5 MPa

K= 5 GPa (PR=0.4998)

reinforcement in tensionC5=500 MPa B-direction

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Why LS-DYNA for this problem?

• Curiosity

• Code is at your disposal

• Expect the same efficiency as for parallel crash simulation

• Rely on the advanced material modeling

other codes may be better

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Initial shortening of time step prevents intrusion

*CONTROL_TIMESTEP,,,,,222*DEFINE_CURVE222

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

default*HOURGLASS 1,1,.00001

DIREC=3

PFAC=0.1

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

no implicit, no time step split between tissue/ALE domain, no mass scaling!

RI HG6 EFG

K=5 GPa

near incompressibility and mm dimensions require tiny time step

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

FSI, MMALE dependent on time step!

RI HG6 EFG

TSSFAC=0.25

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Robustness

• It proves difficult generating an extreme situation where EFG works but standard elements do not!

• EFG is superior in preventing hourglass modes.

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

EFGELFORM=1

*HOURGLASS,6 EFG performance lack: 10% elements switched, CPU time +15%

971:*SECTION_SOLID_EFG1,411.4,1.4,1.4,,,3,2

Birmingham, 25.05.2005www.rudolf-boetticher.de

Conclusions

• FSI simulations with MMALE and *MAT_SOFT_TISSUE EFG solids are possible in LS-DYNA.

• EFG is superior in hourglass prevention for tricky cases.

• Time step dependence of FSI needs further investigation!