fluvial architecture element analysis of the brushy basin ... · fluvial architecture element...
TRANSCRIPT
Volumina Jurassica, 2014, Xii (2): 69–106 DOI: 10.5604/17313708 .1130130
Fluvial architecture element analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
Kenneth G. GALLI1
Key words: Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis, meandering, anastomosing, Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, Kimmeridgian, Colorado.
Abstract. The 85-m Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation in western Colorado, USA, comprises dinosaur-bearing sandstones (architectural element CHR and CH), crevasse-splay deposits and minor levee deposits (architectural element CS), mudstones, marlstones, altered ash beds and minor limestones as well as caliche paleosols and noncalcareous paleosols (architectural element FF). Channel sand-stones occur at five stratigraphic levels at Trail Through Time (TT), eleven levels at Fruita Paleontological Research Area (FP), and at five levels at Echo Canyon (EC). River-channel sandstones hosted by floodplain mudstones tend to have cut down to resistant caliche paleosols. Depositional facies and architectural element analysis show that the rivers were low gradient, mainly anastomosing, with perennial flow, but seasonal with “flashy” peaks in discharge. Dinosaur bone accumulations are found in some floodplain ponds. Isolated bones are present in anastomosing channel sandstones at TT and in channel sandstone 2 at EC. At FP, major accumulations of bones were rapidly buried in the deep pools at three bends in the meandering river resulting in the formation of channel sandstone 2. There is no evidence for a large lacustrine or playa system at the three localities.
1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA; e-mail: [email protected]
Most Morrison Formation streams, sourced in the west-ern highlands, flowed eastward across the depositional basin and were anastomosing in nature. Watering holes formed in the locations of deep erosional scours formed by seasonal stream flooding and accessed the water-table groundwater with this input possibly seasonally controlled by periods of wet and dry conditions. Unionid bivalves are found in a few fluvial sandstones and due to their obligate parasitism with fish, this indicates that fish were present in the Morrison ecosystem in perennial streams (Good, 2004; Turner, Peterson, 2004).
The purposes of this study are to: (1) describe the strati-graphic details of the stream channel deposits present in the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation of western Colorado; (2) show, in detail, their vertical and lateral distribu-tion, architecture and bounding surface hierarchy; and (3) inter-pret the fluvial and associated depositional subenvironments.
INTRODUCTION
The Morrison Formation is world renowned for its as-semblage of dinosaur remains, especially the large her-bivorous sauropods. Much work has been done that at-tempts to place the dinosaurs into a more robustly described ecosystem. A dry climate is thought to have per-sisted during deposition of Morrison strata due to the ba-sin being in the rain shadow of the western highlands and to prevailing westerlies developed due to a subtropical high over the Paleo-Pacific Ocean (Turner, Peterson, 2004). The Morrison Formation of Late Jurassic age is a mo saic of mostly fluvial and minor lacustrine deposits that cover more than 1.5 million km2 of the Rocky Mountain, West-ern Interior and Colorado Plateau regions (Fig. 1; Turner, Peterson, 2004).
70 Kenneth G. Galli
ZONE
800 km4000
MORRISONFORMATION
ELKO
HIGHLANDS
HIGHLANDS
Study Area
Salt Lake City
ConglomeraticSandstone
MOGOLLON
Denver
SUBD
UC
TIO
NZO
NE
MAG
MAT
ICAR
C
MO
RR
ISO
N F
OR
MAT
ION
Brushy
Basin
Member
Member
Member
Wash
Salt
Tidwell
Burro CanyonFormation
San RafaelGroup
50 m
North
40 km200
CNM
GrandJunction
I-70
Colora
do R
iver
Fruita
FP
TT
EC
Lithofacies Symbol & Code #
5
10
4
6
14
16
21
1211
13
15
17
7
3
98
vcvfCLAY
.0625.004.001
GRAVELf2.0
cSILT m
mm
2120
Bright green nodular calcite in sandstoneBrown shale with barite nodules
SAND
Rock Type
Mudstone with roots, pedotubules, peds
Channel sandstone
Siltstone/very fine sandstone
Green siltstone lens
Red-brown mudstone
Volcanic ash
Ash-rich mudstone
Micritc limestone
Green-gray mudstone; some siltstone
Mottled gray mudstone
Gray marlstoneTan siltstone/fine-grained sandstone
White porcellenite-like rock
Organic-rich, fossiliferous claystone-siltstoneCalcite nodules, pedotubules, peds
Nodular calcite in various hosts
Gypsum-green mudstone interbeds
Fig. 1. Study locus, stratigraphic section, facies
areal extent, source areas, and stratigraphy of morrison Formation, after Brenner (1983) and Hintze (1988). TT – Trail Through Time; FP – Fruita Paleontological research area; Ec – Echo canyon; cnm – colorado national monument. General legend for facies used in all vertical measured sections and architectural panels
71Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
RegIONAl SeTTINg
The Morrison Formation was deposited in the most land-ward, back-bulge basin of a foreland basin system developed during Late Jurassic subduction of the paleo-Pacific (Faral-lon) oceanic plate to the west of the preserved Morrison ba-sin (DeCelles, Giles, 1996). Perhaps the relative thinness of the Morrison strata is explained by plate-margin activity dur-ing deposition that prevented the foredeep from subsiding (Miall, 2000). Morrison strata are typically 152 to 183 m thick compared to the tens of thousands of meters of Creta-ceous strata in nearby basins.
Cadigan (1967) showed clearly that the source areas for the Morrison were to the west and the southwest, based on the position of the proximal conglomeratic facies associated with the sandstones and finer facies. The basin was separated from the Paleo-Pacific Ocean by several mountainous re-gions, some of which contributed sediment to the deposi-tional basin. Abundant volcanic ash was sourced from calde-ras in the remnant of an arc-graben depression and in the transtensional rift zone that extended from southern Arizona to central eastern California. The prevailing winds in the Western Interior during the Late Jurassic blew from the southwest. Clastics in the depositional basin were mainly de-rived from highlands that extended from northern Mexico to British Columbia. The highlands are interpreted to have been rift shoulders and uplifts in the back-arc region. A rela-tively minor amount of clastic material was derived from lo-cal topographic highs in the largely buried Ancestral Rockies and perhaps in other local areas farther north (Turner, Peter-son, 2004).
The J-5 unconformity underlies the basal Morrison For-mation of Early Kimmeridgian age. The regional J-5 uncon-formity is present below the base of the Tidwell Member and the regional K-1 unconformity is present at the top of the Brushy Basin strata (Pipiringos, O’Sullivan, 1978; O’Sul-livan, 1980; Peterson, 1994).
Most of the Morrison Formation is Kimmeridgian in age with only the uppermost section being Tithonian in age (Litwin et al., 1998; Schudack et al., 1998). This is based on palynological studies and studies of charophytes and fresh-water ostracods. The Morrison was deposited from 155 to 148 Ma based on isotopic dates of sanidine from smectitic tuffs (Kowallis et al., 1998).
The Brushy Basin is the most widespread member of the Morrison Formation, thinning northward and northeastward from 157 m in southwestern Colorado and eastern Utah, to 79-138 m in the Grand Junction area. It then thickens north-westward to 236 m locally in northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah (Lohman, 1965), closer to the source areas.
lOCATION OF ThIS STUDy
In the study area in and around Fruita in western Colo-rado, the Morrison Formation consists of 120 to 250 m of mostly terrestrial strata deposited primarily during Kim-meridgian (155 Ma) to Tithonian (148 Ma) time (Kowallis et al., 1998). The 85-m Brushy Basin Member of the Morri-son Formation in western Colorado is dominated by a 30-m lower division (lower Brushy Basin Member (Jmbl)) mostly made of red-brown mudstone and a 55-m upper division (upper Brushy Basin Member (Jmbu)) characterized by varie gated smectitic mudstones of floodplain origin where the smectite is altered silicic ash blown eastward by the pre-vailing winds. This change is discerned in the field by the change from non-swelling red-brown floodplain mudstones typical of the lower Brushy Basin strata to the puffy-weath-ering aspect typical of upper Brushy Basin ash-rich mud-stones. However, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of lower Brushy Basin mudstones and upper Brushy Basin ash-rich mudstones showed that in most cases, both facies were rich in the swell-ing clay smectite. This color change is the sole basis of the division of the two Brushy Basin lithosomes.
River-channel sandstones are embedded in the mud-stones and tend to have cut downward to resistant caliche paleosol horizons. Also present are thin beds of lacustrine micritic limestone and four major zones of altered silicic ash falls. These strata were studied at three locations, from west to east: Trail Through Time (TT), Fruita Paleontological Re-search Area (FP), and Echo Canyon (EC). This paper pre-sents the analysis of the many hierarchical orders of fluvial architecture observable in the Morrison strata. Description of bounding surfaces and lithofacies details allow the inter-pretation of the fluvial styles of Brushy Basin Member rivers and their associated facies.
locaTion oF sEcTions mEasurEd
The three sections in western Colorado are in the north-eastern portion of the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Prov-ince (Fig. 1). From west to east, they are: Trail Through Time (TT), Fruita Paleontological Research Natural Area (FP), and Echo Canyon (EC). The TT section is adjacent to and east of the Mygatt-Moore Dinosaur Quarry in the Rabbit Valley Research Natural Area. The TT locality is situated on the north side of I-70, 3 km east of the Utah-Colorado bor-der, accessible by exit 2 off I-70. The FP and TT localities are active dinosaur dig-sites. FP is south of the Colorado River approximately 1–2 km southwest of Fruita and is ac-cessible from old uranium roads off Colorado 340, just north
72 Kenneth G. Galli
of the western entrance to Colorado National Monument. FP is approximately 28 km east of the Utah-Colorado border. EC is a side canyon of No Thoroughfare Canyon located near the eastern margin of the Colorado National Monu-ment. The stratigraphy of No Thoroughfare Canyon was de-scribed by Lohman (1965). The EC locality is accessible from Little Park Road, proceeding south from Grand Junc-tion, Colorado. The site is approximately 42 km east of the Utah-Colorado border.
At the Fruita Paleontological Research Natural Area (FP) there is a remarkable abundance and diversity of Upper Ju-rassic terrestrial fossils preserved within an area of approxi-mately one square kilometer. Utah State Paleontologist Dr. James Kirkland has overseen exploration at both FP and TT and graciously invited me to conduct my dissertation re-search in western Colorado at FP and TT. Kirkland identified six facies at FP: (1) ribbon sandstone facies – bank-con-trolled, gravelly, low-sinuosity river channels; (2) levee fa-cies – characterized by clay with well-sorted sandstone of proximal crevasse splay deposits best seen at channel bends; (3) drab floodplain facies – drab, poorly drained alkaline floodplains with carbonate-cemented crevasse splays and poorly developed paleosols; (4) dark red floodplain facies –oxidized well-drained floodplains with well-developed paleo sols containing nodular carbonates; (5) pond/marsh fa-cies – more or less permanent spring-fed marshes that local-ly overlie channel thalwegs; and (6) alkaline pond facies –ephemeral alkaline floodplain ponds with barite nodules. Each facies also preserves a unique suite of fossils (Kirk-land, 2006).
MeThODS
Lithofacies descriptions were assigned to each distinct rock type and its contained features and detailed vertical stratigraphic sections were measured at the three localities. Lateral profiles for architectural analysis were drawn in the field, using photomosaics at and adjacent to measured sec-tions, and other select locations. Sketches were made of the lateral and vertical extent of lithofacies, thickness trends in trough cross-bed cosets, grain-size trends, thickness of cross-bed cosets, surfaces that cut through cosets, gravel at the base of channels, size, type, and alignment of intraclasts and gravel, and alignment of dinosaur bones.
Specimens of many facies were collected at TT and EC. XRD analysis was performed on about twenty specimens at each locality. SEM analysis augmented the petrographic analysis. Twenty-one samples were analyzed from six depo-sitional environments: (1) red-brown mudstone (floodplain deposits), (2) puffy-weathering green or purple silty mud-stone (altered volcanic ash/ashy flood mudstones, (3) green-
ish-gray mudstone (high water-table regions of floodplains), (4) mottled brown mudstone (phase-one paleosols), (5) thin clay lens in channel sandstone, and (6) non-calcareous mot-tled red-brown mudstone with peds and roots (incipient paleosol).
The samples were prepared for clay-mineral analysis fol-lowing the procedures of Gibbs (1971). 1) Samples were broken to pea-size pellets, using mortar and pestle and then crushed to powder in a Spex ball mill. 2) The powders were saturated in a buffered solution of sodium acetate to dissolve calcite cement without dissolving clays and to saturate ex-pandable clays with Na+. 3) The powders were further dis-aggregated with a mechanical shaker and an ultrasonic probe. 4) Liquid was separated from the clays by centrifuga-tion at 2000 rpm for 20 minutes. 5) Powders were washed in deionized water, resuspended, and recentrifuged to remove the sodium acetate. 6) The <2-micron clay fraction was ob-tained by centrifugation at 500 rpm for 8 minutes-37 sec-onds and then pouring off the suspensate containing the clay fraction. 7) Slides were prepared after the method of Gibbs (1971) by evaporating the suspensate to a paste then smeared onto glass slides.
Three slides were prepared for each sample. One was air-dried and untreated. The second was solvated in an ethylene glycol saturated chamber for at least 24 hours. The third slide was heated to 550°C for one hour. Unoriented mounts of 6 samples were prepared by mixing a small quantity of powder with acetone, forming a slurry, which was dropped onto the slide and allowed to dry. All samples were analyzed on a Siemens X-ray diffractometer, using Cu K-α radiation at 35 kV and 20 mA. The goniometer scanning speed was 2° per minute and chart recorder speed 2 cm per minute. All oriented slides were run from 2° to 30° 2θ. Random-mount slides were measured to 50° 2θ to examine the non-basal dif-fraction peaks in illite and to 65° 2θ to examine the non-ba-sal diffraction peaks in smectite.
The identification of smectite was based on expansion of the (001) peak from 12.5 Å to 16.8–17.0 Å on glycolation and col-lapse to 10.0 Å when heated to 550°C. Diffraction traces of random mounts of 6 samples consisting almost entirely of smectite display a (060) peak at 1.53–1.54 Å, typical of triocta-hedral smectite (Dyni, 1976). Adapting the procedure of Greene-Kelley (1973), these 6 smectite samples were saturated in a 3M lithium chloride solution. Then, the slides were heated to 300°C and placed in a glycol-saturated chamber. These sam-ples re-expanded when glycolated after heating; dioctahedral smectites do not re-expand (Green-Kelley, 1973).
To examine interstitial clay in sandstones by scanning electron microscopy, three 9-mm-size samples of sandstone were mounted with double-sided carbon tape onto aluminum stubs and sputter-coated with gold-palladium for 90 to 120 seconds. Samples were analyzed at Mt. Holyoke Col-
73Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
lege (South Hadley, Massachusetts) using 20 Kv on a JEOL JSM-35CF with a Tracor-Northern energy dispersive system (Galli, 2003).
FACIeS AND STRATIgRAphy OF The BRUShy BASIN MeMBeR
IntrODuctIOn
In the Brushy Basin Member, 21 facies (19 in the Morrison Formation; facies 18, 19 are in overlying formations) were identified in the field based on lithology, geometry, sedimentary structures, and fossils (Table 1). The TT and FP sections have the largest variety of facies and the best-developed paleosols. The EC section, farthest east, has the fewest number of facies. The three measured sections are annotated with paleocurrent roses of selected channel sandstones, and primary sedimentary structures such as ripple cross-lamination (Sr), planar cross-bedding (Sp), trough cross-bedding (St) and horizontally lami-nated or bedded sandstones (Sh), noted by facies codes and by the sketch of the internal bedding features of each channel sand-stone. The general legend for facies used in the vertical strati-graphic sections, architectural panels and throughout the manu-script, and the lithofacies codes, descriptions, and architectural elements containing these facies, are presented in Table 1 (Galli, 2003).
The base of the TT section was the upper 16 m of ex-posed Salt Wash Member strata topped by the uppermost Salt Wash sandstone. The base of the FP section was the con-tact between the Entrada Sandstone and the overlying Sum-merville Formation, which contained sand crystals and salt casts, and my vertical stratigraphic section closely followed that measured by Kirkland and Rassmussen (J. Kirkland, person. commun., 1989). The base of the EC section was the contact between the Kayenta Formation and the overlying Entrada Sandstone. At TT, the upper Brushy Basin was marked by a silica-replaced limestone, marked as volcanic ash zone IV within the Brushy Basin strata and correlated to the other silica-replaced units at the top of the Brushy Basin at FP and EC. This may mark the disconformity that sepa-rates the Upper Jurassic Brushy Basin strata from the Lower Cretaceous Burro Canyon strata. The top of the section at TT was the lowermost sandstone of the Cretaceous Burro Can-yon Formation. The Burro Canyon sandstone is salt and pep-per (black/white) in color and contains green mudchips.
At FP, the uppermost Brushy Basin is marked by a meter-thick puffy green-weathering, volcanic ash bed (my ash IV) that is overlain by a distinctive 2-m-thick bright green prob-able paleosol of green siltstone with green nodular carbonate and sandstone with bright green matrix, mottled in some
places and botryoidal in other places. At EC, the Brushy Ba-sin/Burro Canyon contact is marked by a partially silica-re-placed micrite of the Brushy Basin, overlain by a meter-thick salt and pepper-appearing black/white pebble conglomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation.
The sandstone to fines (SS : F) ratio, one parameter often used to discern fluvial style, with fines including all flood-plain facies such as mudstones, ashy mudstones, paleosols and tabular very-fine grained sandstones, was calculated for the lower Brushy Basin Member (Jmbl) and the upper Brushy Basin Member (Jmbu) at each section. For each lo-cality, I present the stratigraphy of the uppermost Salt Wash Member to contrast it with that of the lower, middle, and upper Brushy Basin Member. At TT, the SS : F ratio of Salt Wash strata is 29 : 71; at FP, the SS : F ratio of Salt Wash strata is 25 : 75; and at EC, the SS : F ratio of Salt Wash strata is 54 : 46. Clay mineralogy was determined by XRD analysis for various facies at TT and EC. At TT, upper Salt Wash strata contain 85.2% illite, 0.6% smectite and mixed-layer illite-smectite, and 14% chlorite. At EC, upper Salt Wash strata contain 86.9% illite-smectite and illite, 2.1% smectite, and 11.0% chlorite.
lowEr BrusHy Basin mEmBEr (JmBl)
At TT, the 31-m-thick lower Brushy Basin Member is overlain by the 48-m-thick upper Brushy Basin strata (Figs 2A, B). Channel sandstones 1, 3, 4, and 5 are single stories while channel sandstone 2 displays an amalgamated 2-story section locally. Channel sandstones 1, 2, and 3 occur in the lower 20 m of the Brushy Basin within the lower Brushy Basin whereas channel sandstones 4 and 5 (and pos-sibly a thin, discontinuous 6th and 7th channel or lens) occu-py the upper Brushy Basin Member. At TT, the SS:F ratio of the lower Brushy Basin is 23 : 77. The outcrop azimuth of channel sandstone 2 is N45°E and the strike is N50°W. Channel sandstone 3 strikes N40°W. Where channel sand-stone 4 ties into the vertical stratigraphic section, it strikes N75°W. Channel sandstone 4 and/or 5 strike directly toward the main channel sandstone on which the “Trail Through Time” is located. In this area approximately 300 m west of the main stratigraphic section, there exist at least 3 sand-stones, possible small channels or lenses, above the channel sandstone 4 at the base of the “Trail Through Time” and these units strike approximately east-west. The K-1 uncon-formity is at Jmb 79 m.
At FP, the color change (CC) occurs at 31m in the sec-tion, and thus the lower Brushy Basin Member is 31-m thick; overlain by the 70-m thick upper Brushy Basin strata. Lower Brushy Basin strata contain channel sandstones 1–8, where-as upper Brushy Basin strata contain channel sandstones 9–11 (Figs 3A–C). The SS:F ratio for lower Brushy Basin
74 Kenneth G. Galli
Table 1lithofacies codes, descriptions, and architectural elements observed in this study. Architectural elements after Miall (1996)
Facies#
Lithofacies Description Architectural element containing this facies
1 Volcanic ash Green to green-gray, very fine-grained, puffy-weathering FF: Overbank Fines
2 Micritic limestone Brown-gray or mottled red-green, some with chert replace-ment near top, depositional bases and erosional tops FF: Overbank Fines
3 Nodular calcite layers Discontinuous, thin, nodular calcite units, commonly in mudstone, often at tops of caliche paleosols FF: Overbank Fines
4 Red-brown mudstone, locally ash-rich Red-brown mudstone, calcareous or non-calcareous, sandy or silty, locally mottled, interbedded with facies 1, 2, 5, 10, 14 and 16 FF: Overbank Fines
5Tabular, dense, hard, calcareous brown-gray siltstone and fine-grained sandstone, locally mottled
Prominent ledge-formers adjacent to and be-low facies 7 channel sandstones
CS: Minor Sand-stone Sheets
6 Green-gray mudstone and fine-grained sandstone
Greenish gray mudstone, silty mudstone and rare fine-grained sandstones of limited extent FF: Overbank Fines
7 Channel sandstone Channel form with basal scour surfaces overlain by gravel, locally fine upward, often cross-bedded
CHR: Major Sandstone Ribbons (most Ch SSs) CH: Major Sandstone Element (FP Ch 2)
8Red-brown-mottled gray mudstone, weathers black with conchoidal fracture
Gray mudstone, calcareous or non-calcareous, with relict red-brown mottles. Sometimes steel blue-gray, dendritic shrink-age patterns, weathers black and with conchoidal fracture.
FF: Overbank Fines
9 Ash-rich mudstone, puffy weatheringPuffy-weathering green, purple, or gray silty mud-stone, weathers whitish with rusty halos around bio-tite. Interbedded ash beds and ashy mudstone.
FF: Overbank Fines
10Very-fine-grained sandstone, thin-bedded, rippled lo-cally, blocky weathering
Fine- to very fine-grained sandstone, weathers green due to illite and/or chlorite, thin-bedded, lens laterally, shallow 40-cm channels present locally, associated with green, puffy-weathering mudstone
CS: Minor Sand-stone Sheets
11 Tan, fine-grained sand-stone, weathers orange
Tan, fine-grained sandstone, grades laterally into major stream channel sandstones at TT. Facies 11 is absent at FP and EC
CHm: Minor Sand-stone Element
12 Gray mudstone Hard, dense marlstone with locally abundant plant fossils and some calcite-filled root tubes. Associated with facies 8. FF: Overbank Fines
13 White, porcellenite-like rock White, porcellenite-like rock, conchoidal fracture, writes like chalk, horizontal laminae, tan and peach-colored mottles FF: Overbank Fines
14 Reddish-brown mudstone with roots, pedotubules, peds
Facies 14 is a variation on facies 4. Mottled red-brown mudstone, may be siliceous, has peds, pedo-tubules, root casts, sometimes purple
FF: Overbank Fines
15
Organic-rich claystone -siltstone with greater than 4% total or-ganic content with wood, plant, and dinosaur bones, weathers orange
Organic-rich claystone-siltstone with plant fossils and a few small logs. Claystones are dark gray; siltstones are light gray. Siltstones have minor green micaceous lamina, occa-sional calcite nodules and animal fossils. Weathers orange.
FF: Overbank Fines
16 Red-brown mudstone with cal-cite nodules, pedotubules, peds
Calcareous red-brown mudstone with calcite-filled root tubes, well-developed peds, including granular peds, subangular blocky peds, layered calcite nodules, crystallaria, rhizoconcretions, drab halos
FF: Overbank Fines
17 Interbedded gypsum and green mudstone Interbedded gypsum and green mudstone FF: Overbank Fines
20 Brown shale with barite nodules Brown shale, mudstone with barite nodules (aver-age: 1- to 4-cm) but some cobble-sized FF: Overbank Fines
21Green nodular, silica-replaced calcite and sandstone with bright green matrix, botroyoidal in places
This facies is only present as 1.5-m bed at top of Brushy Basin Member beneath Buckhorn Con-glomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation
FF: Overbank Fines
75Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
volc
anic
ash
gree
n ca
lcar
eous
mud
ston
e
05101516
inte
rbed
ded
gyps
um a
nd g
reen
mud
ston
em
ottle
d lim
esto
ne
gray
mud
ston
e w
ith re
d m
ottle
s
poor
ly d
evel
oped
ped
otub
ules
, pe
ds in
redd
ish
mud
ston
e
uppe
rmos
t Sal
t Was
h ch
anne
l san
dsto
ne
red
mud
ston
e
red
mud
ston
egree
n si
ltsto
ne
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
red
mud
ston
e
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gree
n m
udst
one
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
Jms
uppe
r par
t of
brow
n m
udst
one
& m
icrit
egr
een
silts
tone
& m
icrit
e
mot
tled
mud
ston
e
ash
mic
rite
ash
silts
tonesi
ltsto
nem
icrit
esilts
tone
ash
Salt Wash Member, Morrison Formation
Cha
nnel
3
Cha
nnel
2
05101520
2 th
in li
mes
tone
bed
s
885
3
8
Cha
nnel
1
(to e
ast)
gray
mud
ston
e w
ith re
d m
ottle
s
inte
rbed
ded
whi
te a
sh a
nd re
d m
udst
one
gray
mud
ston
e w
ith re
d m
ottle
sbr
owni
sh g
ray
silts
tone
puffy
gre
en m
udst
one
brow
nish
gra
y si
ltsto
ne
carb
onat
e no
dule
s, p
eds,
pe
dotu
bule
s in
red
mud
ston
e
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gray
ish
purp
le m
udst
one
5
97
9
7
(1 a
nd 4
)
Jmb
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
5
2
47.1
°N
98.2
°
101.
8°
220° 2
8 8
gray
lim
esto
nesi
lica-
repl
aced
lim
esto
ne2
cher
ty p
aleo
sol
1S
tage
Ica
liche
N
umbe
r of
Pal
eoso
l Zon
es
2S
tage
IIca
liche
3S
tage
IN
C s
ol
Lower Brushy Basin Member, Morrision Formation
12
1234
Fig.
2A
Fig.
2B
Sp
Sh
St
cont
inue
s ne
xt p
age
A
Fig.
2. T
rail
Thro
ugh
Tim
e (T
T) s
trat
igra
phic
sec
tions
A. T
he lo
wer
str
atig
raph
ic s
ectio
n at
TT
for t
he u
pper
mos
t sal
t was
h an
d lo
wer
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
from
0 to
20
m. V
ertic
al s
cale
is in
met
ers
in a
ll se
ctio
ns. s
r – ri
pple
d sa
ndst
one;
sp
– pl
anar
cro
ss-
bedd
ed s
ands
tone
; st –
trou
gh c
ross
-bed
ded
sand
ston
e; s
h –
horiz
onta
lly la
min
ated
/bed
ded
sand
ston
e; n
c –
nonc
alca
reou
s. B
. upp
er s
trat
igra
phic
sec
tion
at t
t. L
ower
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
from
20
to 3
0 m
and
upp
er B
rush
y Ba
sin
stra
ta fr
om 3
0 to
60
m
76 Kenneth G. Galli
brow
n-gr
ay s
iltst
one
25
limes
tone
with
sili
ca-r
epla
ced
top
Cha
nnel
4
303540
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
whi
te, p
urpl
e m
udst
one
whi
telig
ht b
row
n
whi
te p
orce
lleni
te-li
ke
rock
, up
to 2
.1 m
thic
k
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
mot
tled
(in p
lace
s)
gray
mud
ston
e
gray
mud
ston
e
red-
brow
n m
udst
one
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
brow
n m
udst
one
brow
n-gr
ay s
iltst
one
mot
tled
gray
mud
ston
e
gree
n-m
ottle
d re
d m
udst
one
with
ped
otub
ules
and
ped
s,an
d gl
eyin
g
gree
n si
ltsto
ne le
ns
varie
gate
d gr
een
and
purp
le
dom
inan
tly
red-
brow
n co
lor
basa
l cgl
/ss
***
coar
se S
S
4
8
29
10
59
10
7
10
35.3
°13
14
8
Jmbu
Jmbl
Sta
ge II
N
C s
ol4
CO
LOR
CH
AN
GE
CO
RR
ELA
TED
A
SH
HO
RIZ
ON
I E
QU
IVA
LEN
T
silic
a-re
plac
ed s
ands
tone
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
Jmb
20
cove
red
inte
rval
Upp
er B
rush
yB
asin
Mem
ber
Low
er B
rush
yB
asin
Mem
ber
gree
n m
ottle
d m
udst
one
w/ p
edot
ubul
es,
peds
, sili
c. b
ranc
hing
rhiz
ocon
cret
ions
5 gree
n m
ottle
d m
udst
one
w/ p
eds
Cha
nnel
5
45505560
gn p
edog
enic
mds
t, w
eath
ers
peac
h, w
hite
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gree
nish
gra
y vo
lcan
ic a
sh
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gree
n si
lty m
dst,
wea
ther
s m
ultic
olor
ed, w
hite
, pin
k,
purp
le, g
ray-
gree
n, ta
n, b
row
n, lo
cally
lim
onite
-sta
ined
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
purp
lish
whi
te m
udst
one
red
and
brow
n m
udst
one
puffy
whi
te -w
eath
erin
g gr
een
mud
ston
e
puffy
wea
ther
ing
peac
h/ta
n m
udst
one
over
lain
by
lens
of l
oess
-like
silt
ston
e
gree
n m
udst
one
with
ped
otub
ules
an
d pe
ds a
nd g
leyi
ng
mot
tled
gray
mud
ston
epu
ffy w
hite
-wea
ther
ing
gre
en m
udst
one
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
red
mud
ston
e w
/ ped
otub
ules
, ped
s, a
nd m
ottle
s.
yel
low
-wea
th d
k gy
cla
yey
slts
t,or
gani
c-ric
h w
/ woo
d fra
gmen
ts
nodu
lar c
arbo
nate
/mds
t w/
pedo
tubu
les,
ped
s, a
nd g
leyi
ng
quar
ry l
evel
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cm
mm
1
5
98
14
9
7
94
5
9
9
14
14
14
3, 1
6Jm
b40
10
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
purp
lish-
whi
te m
udst
one
9
14
15
14
SIL
T
Sta
ge
II N
C s
ol
Sta
geI-I
I NC
sol
Sta
geII-
IIIca
liche
5678
9
10
CO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N II
CO
RR
ELA
TED
A
SH
HO
RIZ
ON
III
Upper Brushy Basin Member, Morrision Formation
1234
Fig.
2A
Fig.
2B
34
Sp
Sr
Fig.
2 c
ont.
B
77Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
calic
he c
last
s
354550 40
Cha
nnel
4
Cha
nnel
5
Cha
nnel
6
red
and
gray
cal
care
ous
silts
tone
, som
e re
d m
udst
one,
bad
ly w
eath
ered
light
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
gray
peb
bly
med
to v
ery
coar
se @
bas
e to
fine
to
med
at t
op s
ands
tone
up to
.5x1
cm
rd, y
l, bn
, wh
subr
ound
ed c
hert
pebb
les
1x3
cm m
ax m
udst
one
clas
t dia
met
er; m
ean
size
= 1
cm
mf
dese
rt va
rnis
hed,
lt b
row
n -w
eath
erin
g gr
een-
gray
ca
lcar
eous
fine
san
dsto
ne,
prom
inen
t led
ge -f
orm
ing
'mas
sive
' con
tinuo
us s
heet
sa
ndst
one,
Sp
and
St v
isib
le in
pl
aces
clay
dra
pes
gree
n m
ud c
hips
, mea
n si
ze =
2x3
cm
; m
ax. =
5x1
0 cm
calc
areo
us m
udst
one
with
ped
s,
red-
agat
e-ce
nter
ed, s
ilica
-rep
lace
d ca
rbon
ate
nodu
les
sphe
roid
al, l
ight
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing,
gr
een-
gray
, cal
care
ous
fine
sand
ston
e
angu
lar b
lock
y fin
e pe
ds,
pedo
tubu
les,
fine
root
cas
ts, g
reen
m
ottle
s, a
nd s
licke
nsid
es in
red
mud
ston
e an
d m
uddy
silt
ston
e
brow
n-w
eath
erin
g gr
een-
gray
ca
lcar
eous
fine
san
dsto
ne
gree
nish
whi
te fi
ne
sand
ston
e, S
p in
pla
ces
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
Jms3
0
gray
car
bona
te s
oil n
odul
es, r
ed
barit
e &
gyp
sum
nod
ules
, loc
ally
ab
unda
nt in
mud
ston
es o
f Upp
er
Sal
t Was
h M
embe
r
Sta
ge I
calic
he
Salt Wash Member, Morrison Formation
Lower Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation
Cha
nnel
7
Cha
nnel
6
5101520
puffy
gra
y-w
eath
erin
g gr
een
calc
areo
us s
iltst
one
nodu
lar c
arbo
nate
and
mud
ston
e w
/ ped
s5-
cm th
ick
bloc
ky s
ilty
fine
sand
ston
e
brow
n, s
pher
oida
l-wea
ther
ing
gree
n-gr
ay fi
ne
sand
ston
e, (
blue
spl
ay m
arke
r)
puffy
gra
y-w
eath
erin
g gr
een-
dark
gre
en s
iltst
one-
silty
fin
e sa
ndst
ones
, ark
osic
in p
lace
s, (r
ed m
arke
r)
hard
, lig
ht b
uff-g
ray
silts
tone
(y
ello
w s
play
mar
ker b
ed)
red
mud
ston
e, p
oorly
exp
osedba
sal p
lana
r cro
ss-b
edde
d gr
avel
lag,
max
. che
rt cl
ast:
5 m
m
conv
olut
e be
ddin
g, 1
to 2
cm
m
ud c
last
s, a
nd m
ud d
rape
s ne
ar to
p
7 x
30 c
m d
ino
bone
10 c
m b
row
n-w
eath
erin
gca
rbon
ate
nodu
les
Cha
nnel
6S
alt W
ash
Mem
ber
Ch
SS
2 l
evel
165
4
16, 3
9
Jmb0
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
f
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
Jmbl
old
pick
for J
mbu
CO
LOR
CH
AN
GE
**
1
Num
ber o
f Pal
eoso
l Zo
nes
peds
, roo
t-tra
ces,
car
bona
te n
odul
es2
peds
, roo
t cas
ts,
carb
onat
e no
dule
s
3
GR
AVE
L
** C
olor
cha
nge
as n
oted
in re
gion
al c
orre
latio
ns (e
.g.,
Pet
erso
n, 1
994)
Gm
CH
SS
1 le
vel
lt gr
ay c
alca
reou
s si
ltsto
ne (o
rang
e m
arke
r; pr
oduc
tive
horiz
on)
ash-
rich,
gre
en-d
ark
gree
n si
tlsto
ne
Low
er B
rush
yB
asin
Mem
ber*
*
“Upp
er B
rush
yB
asin
Mem
ber”
**
12
123456
Fig.
3A
Fig.
3B
Fig.
3C
Sp St
cont
inue
s ne
xt p
age
A
Fig.
3. F
ruita
pal
eont
olog
ical
Are
a (F
p) s
trat
igra
phic
sec
tions
A. t
he lo
wer
str
atig
raph
ic S
how
s th
e up
perm
ost 2
0 m
of S
alt W
ash
stra
ta a
nd th
e lo
wer
20m
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
stra
ta. B
. Fr
uita
Pal
eont
olog
ical
are
a (F
P) m
iddl
e st
ratig
raph
ic s
ectio
n. l
ower
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
from
31
to 6
0 m
. the
col
or c
hang
e (c
c) o
ccur
s at
31
m in
the
sect
ion.
C. F
ruita
Pal
eont
olog
ical
are
a (F
P) u
pper
str
atig
raph
ic s
ectio
n. u
pper
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
from
60
to 1
01 m
, the
top
of th
e m
orris
on F
orm
atio
n. T
erra
ce H
ill is
now
cal
led
“Fla
t Top
” (K
irkla
nd, 2
006)
78 Kenneth G. Galli
10- t
o 30
-cm
thic
k br
own-
wea
ther
ing
nodu
lar l
imes
tone
35 253040
carb
onat
e no
dule
s w
ithin
fin
e si
lty s
ands
tone
brow
n-re
d so
il an
d ca
rbon
ate
nodu
le la
yers
, 2-
cm th
ick
@ b
ase
to >
5-cm
thic
k ne
ar to
p
sphe
roid
al-w
eath
ered
fine
san
dsto
ne
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
red
mud
ston
e
calic
he @
149m
"whi
te" m
arke
r be
d; s
mal
l cal
cite
nod
ules
brow
n-w
eath
. nod
. mic
ritic
lim
esto
ne
10-c
m th
ick
or le
ss lt
gn-
wh
fn
sdst
with
mm
-sca
le h
oriz
. lam
.
~3 z
ones
(15,
12,
10-
20 c
m th
ick)
, rd
mds
t w
/ car
b. n
odul
es, c
ryst
alla
ria, r
oots
, ped
s,
root
trac
es
puffy
pur
ple
mds
t; "r
ed" m
arke
r bed
mot
tled
red
mud
ston
e
10-c
m th
ick
nodu
lar l
imes
tone
, "o
rang
e" m
arke
r
gree
n si
ltsto
ne w
ith re
d m
ottle
s
10- t
o 15
-cm
whi
te-w
eath
erin
g ba
nd a
bove
spl
ay s
ands
tone
gree
n-m
ottle
d re
d m
dst-s
ltst
whi
te s
iltst
one
10-c
m th
ick
carb
. nod
ules
, la
min
ated
gy,
rd-b
n si
ltsto
negr
een-
mot
tled
red
mud
ston
e10
-cm
thic
k w
hite
ash
"gre
en' m
arke
r
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
mm
m
4
9
3, 1
6
16
21016
9
4m
3
Jmb2
0
13 4m
4
5
67
8
Jmbu
Jmbl
CO
LOR
CH
AN
GE
Upper Brushy Basin Member Lower Brushy Basin MemberCORRELATED
ASH HORIZON I
45505560
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
th. m
dst,
"blu
e" m
arke
r
whi
te fi
ne s
ands
tone
, "ye
llow
" mar
ker
5-cm
thic
k "fl
aky-
wea
th."
gn s
iltst
one
gree
n-m
ottle
d re
d m
udst
one
lam
inat
ed d
ark
red-
brow
n si
ltsto
ne
w/ o
rgan
ics
and
root
s at
top
bn, b
adly
wea
th.
fine
to m
ed s
dst
purp
le-g
y m
dst,
upr p
art w
. gn
mot
tles
and
pedo
tubu
les
very
har
d, in
dura
ted
pedo
geni
c m
dst
purp
le-g
y m
dst,
upr p
art w
/ gn
mtls
and
ped
otub
ules
volc
anic
ash
bed
s
stra
t. le
vel o
f top
of A
l Loo
k H
illgr
ay-p
ink
volc
anic
ash
whi
te disc
ontin
uous
, bro
wn,
fine
san
dsto
ne w
ith c
arbo
nate
no
dule
s an
d pe
doge
nic
feat
ures
in p
lace
s
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gree
n-m
ottle
d pu
rple
mud
ston
e
10- t
o 20
-cm
thic
k, n
odul
ar c
alci
te; t
he to
p of
cha
nnel
sa
ndst
one
10 is
to th
e E
at t
his
stra
t. le
vel.
purp
lepu
ffy w
hite
-wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
1
10, 1
6
5
4m
916
5
1
9
9
9
3
Jmb4
08
91011
CO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N II
CO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N II
I
Upper Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation
123456
Fig.
3A
Fig.
3B
Fig.
3C
34
cont
inue
s ne
xt p
age
Fig.
3 c
ont.
B
79Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
65707580
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
purp
le m
ed. s
dst w
ith y
ello
w-w
hite
w
eath
erin
g rin
ds; t
op is
at s
trat.
leve
l of
low
terr
ace
on e
ast s
ide
of T
erra
ce H
ill
puffy
whi
te-to
ligh
t pur
ple
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e w
ith
min
or p
urpl
e
disc
ontin
uous
, nod
ular
cal
cite
red-
brow
n ru
bble
-cov
ered
mud
ston
edi
scon
tinuo
us 5
- to
10-c
m th
ick
nod.
car
b.
bn s
hale
w/ 1
- to
4-cm
bar
ite n
odul
es,
top
uppe
r ter
race
E s
ide
of T
erra
ce H
ill*
plug
ged
horiz
on(s
) of c
arbo
nate
w
ith s
ome
gyps
um
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
brow
nish
mud
ston
e
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
red
mud
ston
e, p
uffy
in p
lace
s
puffy
whi
te a
nd g
ray-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
epu
ffy p
urpl
e-w
eath
erin
g m
udst
one
puffy
whi
te a
nd g
ray-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
epu
ffy w
hite
and
yel
low
-wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
eno
dula
r cal
cite
und
erla
in b
y gy
psum
puffy
pur
ple-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
e
3- to
4-c
m th
ick
gree
n as
h-ric
h si
ltsto
ne ;
10-c
m th
ick
red
mud
ston
e w
ith g
reen
m
ottle
s w
ithin
a n
8- t
o 17
-cm
zon
e
puffy
pur
ple-
gray
-wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
es
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
mm
m
5
9
9
9
34
3
9
16
(4)
4
9
939
9
5m
9
20
Jmb6
0
12
13
Upper Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation
puffy
gra
y-w
eath
erin
g m
udst
one
with
a li
ght y
ello
w la
yer i
n m
iddl
e
859095100
som
e pu
rple
silt
ston
e
dark
pur
ple-
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
sand
ston
e / m
ottle
d re
d m
udst
one
w/
root
s an
d sc
atte
red
carb
. nod
ules
, pe
ds, r
hizo
conc
retio
ns
gree
n fin
e to
med
. san
dsto
ne,
brig
ht g
reen
in p
lace
spu
ffy w
hite
mud
ston
ebrow
n no
d. li
mes
tone
w/ g
n an
d w
h ch
ert
puffy
gra
y m
udst
one
puffy
whi
te m
udst
one
yello
wis
h gr
een
silts
tone
yello
w-g
ray-
wea
ther
ing
tan
mud
ston
edi
scon
tinuo
us fi
ne to
med
. san
dsto
ne
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
gree
n si
ltsto
ne w
ith g
reen
nod
. car
bona
te
and
sdst
with
brig
ht g
reen
mat
rix, m
ottle
d in
pla
ces,
bot
ryoi
dal i
n pl
aces
puffy
gre
en-w
eath
erin
g vo
lcan
ic a
shfla
t-bas
ed fi
ne s
ands
tone
bed
, 47
-cm
long
, rip
pled
gree
n no
ncal
care
ous
mud
ston
e-si
ltsto
ne
nonc
alca
reou
s pu
rplis
h re
d m
udst
one-
pu
ffy m
udst
one
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
f
2.0
cS
ILT
mm
m
9
9
99
10
163
10
9
9
101
6
21
Jmb8
0
K-1
Jmb1
01
Kbc
0
14
GR
AVE
LCO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N IV
Upper Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation
123456
Fig.
3A
Fig.
3B
Fig.
3C
56
Fig.
3 c
ont.
C
80 Kenneth G. Galli
gree
n ca
lcar
eous
san
dsto
nelig
ht b
row
n ca
lc. s
ands
tone
35 30 25
Jms3
5.5
dark
bro
wn
mud
ston
e
choc
olat
e br
own
mud
ston
e w
ith g
reen
mot
tles,
gl
eyin
g, a
nd c
arbo
nate
nod
ules
, ver
tical
pur
ple
stai
ns (r
oots
?), f
ine
crum
b-gr
anul
ar p
eds,
rh
izoc
oncr
etio
ns
gree
n-gr
ay c
alca
reou
s si
lty s
ands
tone
low
er 2
0 cm
has
laye
rs o
f sm
all l
imon
itic
halo
s ar
ound
bla
ck p
lant
? m
atte
r
friab
le, p
oorly
cem
ente
d,
wel
l-sor
ted
gree
n-gr
ay-w
hite
ca
lcar
eous
san
dsto
ne
– m
ediu
m-g
rain
ed w
ith
dist
urbe
d be
ddin
g at
bas
e;
fines
upw
ard
Sx
Sx ca
lc. g
reen
mds
tre
d m
udst
one
puffy
var
iega
ted/
purp
le-w
eath
. dul
l bro
wn
mds
t.
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04.0
01
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
mm
m
Jms2
2
Jmb0
Salt Wash Member, Morrison Formation
1616
redd
ish-
brow
n m
udst
one,
loca
lly a
sh-r
ich
poor
ly e
xpos
ed S
t
15 51020
15 x
80+
cm
Apa
tosa
urus
lim
b bo
ne, d
isco
vere
d by
K. G
alli
two
dino
saur
bon
es
(one
is a
ver
tebr
a)
poor
ly e
xpos
ed fi
ne
sand
ston
e (s
mal
l cha
nnel
)
redd
ish-
brow
n m
udst
one,
loca
lly p
uffy
poor
ly-d
evel
oped
car
bona
te n
odul
es,
8-m
m-d
iam
eter
x 2
2-m
m lo
ng p
edot
ubul
es,
3 x
5-m
m g
ranu
lar p
eds,
1-2
-mm
cru
mb
peds
, mot
tles
redd
ish-
brow
n m
udst
one,
loca
lly p
uffy
16 c
arbo
nate
nod
ule
laye
rs
inte
rbed
ded
with
red
mud
ston
e (3
)
carb
onat
e no
dule
s, 3
x 3
-mm
; 6 x
7-m
m
suba
ngul
ar b
lock
y to
gra
nula
r ped
s,
pedo
tubu
les
in re
d m
udst
one
(16)
44 44104
7
7
redd
ish-
brow
n m
udst
one,
loca
lly p
uffy
redd
ish-
brow
n m
udst
one,
loca
lly p
uffy
4
5 / 1
0
Cha
nnel
2
Cha
nnel
1
16m
ottle
s, 5
x 5
-mm
cru
mb-
gran
ular
ped
s (A
-hor
izon
)
(A-h
oriz
on)
(A-h
oriz
on)
Jmb0
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
mm
m
1
234
Lower Brushy Basin Member, Morrision Formation
1234
Fig.
4A
Fig.
4B
12
cont
inue
s ne
xt p
age
A
Fig.
4. e
cho
Cany
on (e
C) s
trat
igra
phic
sec
tions
A. u
pper
mos
t Sal
t Was
h st
rata
and
low
er 2
0 m
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
Mem
ber
incl
udin
g ch
anne
l san
dsto
nes
1 an
d 2.
B.
Echo
can
yon
(Ec)
mid
dle
stra
tigra
phic
sec
tion
incl
udes
top
of lo
wer
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
(fro
m 2
0 to
24
m) a
nd lo
wer
par
t of u
pper
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
, fro
m 2
4 to
60
m
81Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
maj
or c
olor
cha
nge
from
re
ddis
h-br
own
belo
w to
var
iega
ted
and
ligh
t gre
en-g
ray
abov
e.
puffy
-gra
y-w
eath
erin
g re
d m
udst
one
25
30 203540
**
puffy
ligh
t gra
y-w
eath
erin
g m
udst
one
red-
brow
n ca
lcar
eous
m
udst
one
with
ped
s
red
mud
ston
e w
ith g
reen
ish
mot
tles
light
bro
wn,
kno
bby-
wea
ther
ing,
fri
able
gra
y fin
e sa
ndst
one
brow
n-w
eath
erin
g bl
ue-g
ray
calc
areo
us
fine
sand
ston
e, d
eser
t-var
nish
ed
puffy
-gra
y-w
eath
erin
g vo
lcan
ic a
sh b
ed(s
)
puffy
-gra
y-w
eath
erin
g vo
lcan
ic a
sh b
edde
sert-
varn
ishe
d br
own
-wea
ther
ing
calc
areo
us li
ght
gree
n-gr
ay c
hann
el s
ands
tone
pinc
hes
out t
o S
55E
inte
rbed
ded
ash
beds
and
mud
ston
e
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
light
gra
y-gr
een
calc
areo
us
fine
sand
ston
e le
ns, d
eser
t-var
nish
ed
puffy
-wea
ther
ing
light
gra
y si
ltsto
ne
brow
n-w
eath
erin
g ca
lcar
eous
lig
ht g
reen
-gra
y fin
e sa
ndst
one
**
16
4
5 9
9
16
12/ 5
9
CO
LOR
CH
AN
GE
1-m
m p
edot
ubul
es, c
ryst
alla
ria, i
ndis
tinct
ped
s, s
catte
red
calc
ite c
ryst
als,
1 x
1 a
nd 4
.5 x
7.5
-cm
mot
tles
CO
RR
ELA
TED
A
SH
I H
OR
IZO
N
567
8
.001
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04
SA
ND
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
Lower BrushyBasin MemberUpper Brushy Basin Member
Jmbl
Jmbu
50 455560ca
lcar
eous
bla
ck, w
hite
, lig
ht g
reen
san
dsto
ne
puffy
pur
ple-
and
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
gree
n si
ltsto
ne
puffy
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
silts
tone
dark
gre
en- a
nd p
urpl
e pu
ffy-w
eath
erin
g,
friab
le, f
inel
y la
min
ated
gre
en s
iltst
one
brow
n an
d pu
rple
puf
fy-w
eath
erin
g si
ltsto
ne
puffy
dul
l bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
mud
ston
egr
een
mud
ston
e w
ith re
d m
ottle
sm
udst
one
with
ped
s an
d pe
dotu
bule
s in
terb
edde
d w
ith c
arbo
nate
nod
ules
gree
n m
udst
one
w/ r
ed m
ottle
s an
d pe
dotu
bule
spu
ffy b
row
n-w
eath
erin
g gr
een
silts
tone
purp
le a
nd g
reen
, par
tially
sili
ca-r
epla
ced
lim
esto
ne a
nd m
arls
tone
, som
e m
ottle
s
puffy
bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
calc
areo
us
light
gre
en-g
ray
silts
tone
puffy
dul
l lig
ht b
row
n-w
eath
erin
g ca
lcar
eous
gre
en s
iltst
one
volc
anic
ash
bed
puffy
ligh
t bro
wn-
wea
ther
ing
silts
tone
light
gre
en v
olca
nic
ash
limes
tone
volc
anic
ash
bed
14
4
1
9
1
9
16
9
2
9
16
91
9
10
95
9
CO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N II
9
CO
RR
ELA
TED
AS
H H
OR
IZO
N II
I
10
11
vcvf
CLA
Y
.062
5.0
04
GR
AVE
Lf
2.0
cS
ILT
m
mm
Jmb4
0
Upper Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation
34
1234
Fig.
4A
Fig.
4B
Fig.
4 c
ont.
B
82 Kenneth G. Galli
strata at FP is 14 : 86. Lower Brushy Basin strata here are dominated by 3–5-m thick facies 4 red-brown mudstones, whereas the lower portion of upper Brushy Basin strata (Jmb 31–54 m) are characterized by finely intercalated variegated purple-gray, puffy-weathering, ash-rich mudstones and cre-vasse splays, paleosols, and volcanic ash zones. The upper-most 47 m of Brushy Basin strata (Jmb 54–101) exhibit much thicker facies 9 ashy mudstones, averaging approxi-mately 4–5 m in thickness as well as thicker paleosol zones. The K-1 unconformity is at Jmb101m.
At EC, the color change occurs at 24 m in the section, and so the lower Brushy Basin Member is 24 m thick and overlain by the 52-m-thick upper Brushy Basin Member (Figs 4A, B). The K-1 unconformity is at 76 m, marking the top of the Brushy Basin strata. The SS:F ratio for lower Brushy Basin strata is 15 : 85. At EC, even the facies 4 red-brown mudstones of the lower Brushy Basin Member are smectitic, varying from 74% to 97.3% smectite. Thus, it ap-pears that even though all variegated purple-gray puffy-weathering ashy mudstones are smectitic, not all non-puffy-weathering, red-brown mudstones are low in smectite. Clay mineralogy of the lower Brushy Basin strata here, from the base-up trends from 85.4% illite, 1.7% mixed-layer illite-smectite, and 12.9% chlorite at 0.6 m in the matrix of a facies 5 brownish-gray siltstone, to 92.4% smectite, 3.4% mixed-layer illite-smectite-illite, and 4.2% chlorite from matrix of channel sandstone 2 at ~7 m in section to nearly pure (99.7%) smec-tite in matrix of channel sandstone 3 at 19 m in the section.
The two dominant facies of the lower Brushy Basin are red-brown mudstones (facies 4) and puffy-weathering ash-rich mudstones (facies 9). Major facies include channel sandstones (facies 7) and their associated crevasse-splay de-posits composed of siltstone/very-fine sandstone (facies 5). These crevasse splays are found adjacent to and under their related channel sandstone bodies and the splays are found intercalated with facies 4 floodplain mudstones and ashy mudstones. Caliche paleosols are also a major facies and in-clude mottled incipient caliche developed in floodplain mud-stones as well as ashy mudstones. Caliche paleosols with calcite nodules, pedotubules and peds (facies 16) are a major component of the strata as are nodular calcite in various hosts (facies 3), and noncalcareous mudstone with roots, pedotubules and peds (facies 14). Minor facies include thin micritic limestones (facies 2).
The Brushy Basin strata at TT and EC have light gray to tan, tabular, fine-grained sandstones of variable thickness. These sandstones are calcite-cemented and sometimes have desert varnish. Small- to medium-scale cross-bedding is pre-sent just above the contact with the Salt Wash Member, com-monly over a thin interval of mudstone-rich strata. The ma-jority of the channel sandstones in the Brushy Basin are in the lower Brushy Basin at all localities, with dinosaur bones
present in all TT channel sandstones, in channel sandstone 2 at FP and in channel sandstone 2 at EC. At TT, channel sand-stones 1, 2, and 3 are in the lower Brushy Basin, whereas channel sandstones 4 and 5 are in the upper Brushy Basin at TT. At FP, channel sandstones 1–8 are in the lower Brushy Basin, channel sandstone 9 lies near the boundary between the lower and upper Brushy Basin Members, and channel sandstones 10 and 11 are in the upper Brushy Basin Member.
At EC, as at TT, channel sandstones 1 and 2 are in the lower Brushy Basin and channel sandstones 3, 4, and 5 are in the upper Brushy Basin. Lower Brushy Basin strata have a much higher sandstone-to-fines ratio than the upper Brushy Basin at all localities. At EC, the thickest and only dinosaur-bearing channel sandstone (channel 2) at EC is in the lower Brushy Basin strata at 6 meters in Brushy Basin Member. The 24-m lower Brushy Basin section at EC is characterized by reddish-brown mudstones, locally ash-rich. These are in-terbedded with channel sandstones 1 and 2, thin siltstone/fine sandstone splay units, and caliche horizons, including one thick zone with 16 distinct carbonate nodule layers in a 1-m interval.
uPPEr BrusHy Basin mEmBEr (JmBu)
The upper Brushy Basin at TT is 49 m thick. It has a channel-sandstone-to-fines ratio of 10 : 90; ashy mudstone makes up 40% of the strata. The upper Brushy Basin silt-stones and mudstones at EC and TT are predominantly smectitic, although a few are mainly chlorite.
A chalk-white porcellenite-like rock (facies 13) up to 2.1 m thick at Jmb39 appears to be a silica-replaced ash or mudstone bed. Approximately 2 to 3 m of caliche and silica-replaced caliche are above this in the section, overlain by the Mygatt-Moore dinosaur quarry level at Jmb43 followed by the thickest ash unit (3 m).
At the FP section, the 85-m-thick upper Brushy Basin has a channel-sandstone-to-fines ratio of 8 : 92; ash-rich mudstone makes up 52% of the strata. The greenish mud-stones in the lower Brushy Basin and green siltstone at FP possibly suggest illite and/or chlorite, although no clay anal-yses were performed on these strata. The upper Brushy Ba-sin strata at FP are dominated by thin to thick, ash-rich mud-stones; siltstones and mudstones with superimposed paleo sols; and continuous, massive, tabular siltstone/fine-grained sand-stones. Thick, cross-bedded channel sandstones make up only 7 m of the section. Superimposed sandstone channels are present in at least three locations at FP, including channel sandstones 6 and 7 that are within the stratigraphic section.
Unique at FP are three crevasse-splay deposits interca-lated with levee deposits present at the bends of the second channel sandstone. These can be traced away from the chan-
83Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
nel for 10s of meters. The three crevasse-splay/levee se-quences contain abundant dinosaur bones. Two- to 10-m-thick lacustrine micrites occur predominantly in the southeastern and northeastern part of FP. An especially thick lacustrine interval in the southeastern FP is associated with channel sandstones 3, 4, and 5. Agate Hill in the northeastern FP region is surrounded by another thick lacustrine mud-stone interval. Fossils include broken, disarticulated dino-saur bones, fish fossils, conchostrachans, and abundant plant debris, as well as red agatized snails in the Agate Hill area (Kirkland, 2006). Some lacustrine intervals include radial barite and calcite nodules.
FlUvIAl ARChITeCTURe eleMeNT ANAlySIS
oBsErVaTions
Introduction
In river systems, the lithofacies (Fig. 1, Table 1) combine to form structures at three scales: mm to cm microforms formed in minutes to hours, like ripples; cm to m mesoforms formed in days to years, such as dunes; and m to 10s of m macroforms, formed in and persisting for years to thousands of years, like point bars and crevasse splays. All levels in the hierarchy may be active simultaneously in a river. Architec-tural-element analysis uses lithofacies to describe fluvial strata. A hierarchy of physical scales also exists, for exam-ple, from the cross-bed foreset to basin-fill. Ideally, at least 14 orders of magnitude are represented, from a few square centimeters in a ripple foreset to the tens of thousands of square kilometers of a basin (Miall, 1996).
First- and second-order surfaces are within microform and mesoform deposits, respectively. First-order surfaces bound ripple sets and represent the continuous sedimentation of a train of ripples. Second-order surfaces bound cosets with different lithofacies above and below the boundary; the surfaces indicate changes in flow conditions or direction, but commonly not a significant time break. A third-order surface is erosional and dips at low angle within macroforms, with the lithofacies the same above and below the surface. These surfaces are sometimes called “reactivation surfaces” (Fig. 2A, channel sandstone 2). A fourth-order surface bounds the upper surfaces of macroforms, and is usually flat to convex upward. Underlying bedding surfaces and first- to third-order surfaces are truncated at low angle, or are locally parallel with, a fourth-order surface, indicating the fourth-order surfaces are due to lateral or downstream accretion. Mud drapes are commonly present along the surface. The basal scours of minor channels, such as chute channels, are fourth-order surfaces.
Fifth-order surfaces bound major sand bodies, such as channel-fill complexes. The surfaces are flat to concave up-ward, but can have local cut-and-fill relief and lag gravels. Sixth-order surfaces define groups of channels, paleovalleys, or members of formations. Seventh-order surfaces bound depositional systems, commonly members of formations. Eighth-order surfaces bound major basin-fill complexes (Fig. 2A, channel sandstone 2).
The proportions of primary sedimentary structures ob-served and measured at FP and TT are shown in Table 2.
Table 2proportions of sedimentary structures at Fruita paleontological Area (Fp)
and the Trail Through Time (TT)
Location Sp % St % Sh % Sr %
Fruita Paleontological Area
Channel 2 23 58 6 13
Channel 8 40 60 0 0
Trail Through Time
Channel 1-1 77 0 23 0
Channel 1-2 100 0 0 0
Channel 1 mean 88 0 12 0
Channel 2-1 73 0 27 0
Channel 2-2 64 0 36 0
Channel 2-3 15 0 80 5
Channel 2-4 46 19 35 0
Channel 2-5 46 4 50 0
Channel 2-6 32 23 45 0
Channel 2 mean 46 8 46 <1
Channel 3-2 44 50 0 6
Channel 3-3 81 19 0 6
Channel 3-4 0 83 16 1
Channel 3 mean 31 56 19 3
Channel 4-1 11 50 39 0
Channel 4-2 26 74 0 0
Channel 4-6 100 0 0 0
Channel 4 mean 46 41 13 0
Grand mean 52 26 22 <1
Sp – planar cross-bedded sandstone, St – trough cross-bedded sandstone, Sh – horizontally laminated sandstone, Sr – rippled sandstone
84 Kenneth G. Galli
These include the percentage occurrence of Sp, St, Sh, and Sr within the channel sandstones.
Eight architectural elements, defined by their geometry, bounding surfaces, size, orientation with respect to paleo-flow, and containing distinctive lithofacies assemblages were described by Miall (1985) after Allen’s (1983) original description of the element in fluviatile sediments. These ele-ments are thought to contain all possible lithofacies in a flu-vial sequence.
The Brushy Basin Member strata in the study area are dominated by architectural element FF, Overbank Fines. This overbank fines element contains facies 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14,15, 16, 17, 20, and 21 (Table 1).
The next most abundant element is the Major Sandstone Ribbon (CHR) element. This element contains all facies 7 sandstones except channel sandstone 2 at FP, which is con-tained within the Major Channel Sandstone element (CH). Minor Sandstone Sheet (CS) element contains facies 5 and 10 tabular sandstone bodies that are best observed associated with channel sandstone bodies at FP and to a lesser extent at TT. Rare CHm, Minor Sandstone Element, contains facies 11 tan, fine-grained sandstone bodies.
Fluvial system at Trail Through Time (TT)
The sandstones at TT are ribbon sandstones, based on their map patterns (Figs 5, 6). The channel sandstones are commonly single-story, for example, channels 1, 3, 4, and 5. Channel sandstones are typically 1-3 m thick, but up to 5 m or more locally. Occasionally, there is a multi-story sand-stone, as in channel sandstone 2, but even then, this is a local feature. The east-west-oriented Frontage Road along the southern perimeter of TT, exposes the east-west lateral ex-tent of channels 2 and 3 within the lower Brushy Basin strata and channel 4 in the lower portion of the upper Brushy Basin strata (Fig. 5A) and the thin ribbon aspect of the channel bodies. Channel sandstone 2 was traced and measured for its entire 67-m horizontal breadth or lateral extent. Its thickness varies from 0.25 m at its feather edge at the western end of Frontage Road to a maximum of 7.1 m and then to nothing to the east where it “wings out” which is characteristic for a ribbon sandstone body. From 0 to 9.1m channel sandstone 2’s outcrop azimuth is N80°E. This includes the two-story channel segment from 5 to 10 m, where a 0.4 m to 1.2 m lower story is overlain by a 0.8 m upper story. From 9.1 to 16.5 m, its azimuth is due east and thickness is 1.2 m, from 16.5 to 19.5 m, it’s azimuth is N30°E and thickness is 1.2 m, from 19.5 to 22.5 m, its azimuth is due east, with thickness of 2.7 m, and then from 22.5 to 67 m its azimuth is N25°E and thickness varies from 2.4 m to 6.7 to 7.1 m and then to 5.5 m and finally 0.9 to 0.7 m near its easternmost edge.
Paleoflow in lower channel 2 is toward 98.2° (to the east) and 101.8° in the upper amalgamated channel (to the east). Paleoflow in channel 3 is toward 220° (to the southeast), and paleoflow in channel 4 is toward 35.3° (to the northeast). The channel sandstones pinch out into associated floodplain facies (Figs 5A, 6). The thalweg gravel of rounded caliche and mudstone small pebbles and granules is present at the base of channel 1 (Fig. 7A). Locally, channel 2 is a two-story amalgamated channel (Figs 6; 7, panel 2). Definition of a macroform story is based on: (1) erosional scour base, (2) gravel lag, (3) laterally extensive, and (4) significant mud top (Miall, 1996). Channel sandstone 2 exhibits oversteep-ened cross-beds (Fig. 7, Panel 2). Following a rapid drop in river stage, the excess pore pressure of the water in the sand caused down-slope deformation of the cross-beds. Planar cross-bedded sandstone (Sp) overlain by trough cross-bed-ded sandstone (St), which is overlain by coarser-grained horizontally laminated sandstone (Fig. 7, panel 4) indicates either an increase in flow velocity of the river or more likely, a drop in the river stage, which caused increased flow from lower flow regime features (Sp and St) to upper flow regime features (Sh). Panel 6 photograph shows Sp overlain by St topped by a 4th order bounding surface and then upper flow-regime horizontally laminated medium sandstone. Thus, Fig. 7B depicts a non-systematic fill of the channel over time.
Channel 2 is single-story, with a non-systematic fill of 15-48-cm-thick planar cross-beds. After the channel was scoured out, migration of trains of linguoid bars at or near bankfull discharge constructed the cosets of planar cross-bed sets, with flow consistently to the southeast. The small vari-ation of individual paleocurrent azimuths from the mean suggests an anastomosing pattern. Reactivation surfaces within the cosets reflect separate floods or fluctuations in a flood.
Paleoflow was to the northeast (47.1°) for channel sand-stone 1; to the east (98.2°) for the lower story of channel sandstone 2; toward 101.8° for channel sandstone 2’s upper story; to the southwest (220°) for channel sandstone 3; to the northeast (35.3°) for channel sandstone 4 (Fig. 6). Channel sandstone 3 displays Sp overlain by a thin interval of ripples (Sr), followed by St. The bedload of the channel contains a 2.0 × 4.5-cm Stegosaurus vertebrae (Fig. 8A). The mean of 30 paleocurrent readings show that the paleoflow of channel sandstone 3 was to 220° (southwest) which is different than all the others at TT. The mean flow direction for channels 1, 2, and 4 are to the northeast or east (Fig. 6). Channel 4 is 2.3 to 3.0-m thick and the otherwise friable sandstone is partial-ly silica-replaced in patches, especially along slanting cross-bed strata (Fig. 8B). Where channel sandstone 4 is thinnest, the lower portion exhibits a coset of Sp with divergent paleo-current flow directions.
85Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
55
54
4
4
Cha
nnel
2C
hann
el 3
Cha
nnel
4
A
B
Fig.
5. p
hoto
mos
aics
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
stra
ta a
t Tra
il Th
roug
h Ti
me
A. P
hoto
mos
aic
show
ing
the
arch
itect
ure
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
s 2,
3, a
nd 4
and
enc
losi
ng fl
oodp
lain
mud
ston
es a
nd a
ssoc
iate
d fa
cies
. Vie
w is
to th
e no
rth
and
show
s th
e ea
st-w
est l
ater
al e
xten
t of
chan
nels
2 a
nd 3
with
in th
e lo
wer
Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
and
cha
nnel
4 in
the
low
er p
ortio
n of
the
uppe
r Bru
shy
Basi
n st
rata
. not
e th
e th
in ri
bbon
asp
ect o
f the
cha
nnel
bod
ies.
Pal
eoflo
w in
low
er c
hann
el
2 is
to th
e ea
st (9
8o ), a
nd to
the
east
-sou
thea
st (1
02o )
in th
e up
per a
mal
gam
ated
cha
nnel
. Pal
eoflo
w in
cha
nnel
3 is
tow
ard
the
sout
heas
t (22
0°),
and
in c
hann
el 4
is to
war
d th
e no
rthe
ast (
35.3
°). n
ote
that
the
chan
nel s
ands
tone
s pi
nch
out i
nto
asso
ciat
ed fl
oodp
lain
faci
es. B
. cha
nnel
san
dsto
ne 2
86 Kenneth G. Galli
Ch
2 Lo
wer
Sto
ry
N =
10
98.2
°
calic
he
flood
plai
n m
udst
one
(4)
flood
plai
n m
udst
one
(4)
calic
he (1
6)
flood
plai
n m
udst
one
(4)
flood
plai
n m
udst
one
2-1
2-5
2-6
2-2
2-3
2-4
Sto
ry 1
Sto
ry 2
0
1040 20
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
4-1
f c
4-2
4-6 f -
m
m - v
c
silic
a-re
plac
ed
1-1
1-2
0
30
2040
6080
100
ash-
rich
mud
ston
ecr
evas
se-s
play
silt
ston
epo
orly
-dev
elop
ed n
onca
lcar
eous
pal
eoso
l (14
) gr
een-
mot
tled
red-
brow
n si
lty m
udst
one
ash-
rich
mud
ston
e (9
)
47.1
°N
101.
8°
35.3
°
Ch
2 U
pper
Sto
ry
WE
ST
EA
ST
App
roxi
mat
e lin
e of
ver
tical
stra
tigra
phic
sec
tion
N =
32
N =
30
N =
5
N =
7
calic
he
220°
met
ers
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne4
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne3
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne2
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne 1
Lower Brushy Basin MemberUpper BrushyBasin Member Fi
g. 6
. Arc
hite
ctur
e of
cha
nnel
san
dsto
nes
(ele
men
t Ch
R) i
n lo
wer
40
m a
t Tra
il Th
roug
h Ti
me
(TT)
and
the
line
of s
ectio
n fo
r con
stru
ctio
n of
the
vert
ical
str
atig
raph
ic s
ectio
n
Blan
k ar
eas,
cal
iche
, mud
ston
es, a
sh-r
ich
mud
ston
es a
re c
onta
ined
with
in o
verb
ank
fines
ele
men
t (FF
). cr
evas
se-s
play
dep
osits
are
ele
men
t cs.
som
e th
in c
reva
sse
spla
ys a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith c
hann
el
2 ar
e no
t sho
wn.
des
igna
tions
2–1
and
4–6
ref
er to
loca
tions
of v
ertic
al s
ectio
ns s
how
n in
arc
hite
ctur
e pa
nels
. on
pale
ocur
rent
ros
e ar
row
sho
ws
aver
age
pale
oflo
w d
irect
ion,
n –
sam
ple
num
ber.
myg
att-
moo
re d
inos
aur Q
uarr
y le
vel i
s ~2
–3 m
abo
ve to
p of
cha
nnel
san
dsto
ne 4
. Top
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
mem
ber i
s at
79
m
87Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
Low
er s
tory
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
2 a
t TT
red
mud
ston
eP
anel
4 Sh
Sp
St
26
25
1233.7
6
24
48 c
m
34 c
m
19 c
m
Sp
cose
ts
0m2
40m
1
0mS
h
4gr
een-
purp
le p
uffy
gro
und
0m
Sh
Sp
cose
ts16 15
171819
20
15 c
m35
cm
36 c
m
26 c
m
med
ium
- co
arse
sa
ndst
one
2
Pan
el 2
2S
h
Und
erla
in b
y 31
-cm
-thic
k re
d ca
liche
121
8
1.8234
8
red
mud
ston
esa
ndst
one
ShS
p
St
Sp
0 m
24
6 10
1
2 4
22
6 5
9
14
1011
7
13
5S
p
med
ium
san
dsto
ne
0 m
4
35
12345
24
6
cove
red
Sh
Sp Sh
Sp
Sh
St
Sp
1
2
34
5
0m0m5.
2
cf
Upp
er s
tory
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
2th
at o
verli
es lo
wer
sto
ry
Pan
el 2
pho
to:
Pan
el 4
pho
to:
calic
he
1.3
Sp c
oset
(4)
(16)
(16) (4)
123456
red-
brow
n pu
ffy m
udst
one
Sx
and
Sh
Red
mud
ston
e0
m
1
0 mPan
els
1 an
d ph
oto
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
1 a
t TT
24
Pan
el 5
CH
2,P
anel
6
Pan
el 1
Sp
St
Sh
A B
Fig.
7. A
rchi
tect
ure
pane
ls a
nd p
hoto
grap
hs o
f cha
nnel
s 1
and
2 at
Tra
il Th
roug
h Ti
me
(TT)
A. A
rchi
tect
ure
pane
ls a
nd p
hoto
grap
hs fo
r cha
nnel
san
dsto
ne 1
at t
t. B
. arc
hite
ctur
e pa
nels
and
pho
togr
aphs
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
2. P
anel
2 p
hoto
grap
h is
of o
vers
teep
ened
cro
ss-b
eds.
see
Fig
. 6 fo
r loc
atio
n of
pho
togr
aphs
and
sec
tions
. cha
nnel
1, p
anel
1 il
lust
rate
s m
udst
one
clas
ts a
t bas
e, p
lana
r cro
ss-b
ed s
ets
up to
14
cm th
ick,
car
bona
te n
odul
es w
ith p
edot
ubul
es. P
anel
2 s
how
s pl
anar
cro
ss-b
eds
up to
13
cm
thic
k. P
anel
4 s
how
s sa
ndst
one,
with
min
or li
mon
itic
stai
ns a
long
bed
ding
. cha
nnel
2, p
anel
6 s
how
s th
at o
verly
ing
red
mud
ston
e is
cut
out
to w
est w
here
cha
nnel
2 h
as tw
o st
orie
s
88 Kenneth G. Galli
Fig.
8. A
rchi
tect
ure
and
phot
ogra
phs
of c
hann
els
3 an
d 4
at T
rail
Thro
ugh
Tim
e (T
T)
A. a
rchi
tect
ure
pane
ls a
nd p
hoto
grap
h of
cha
nnel
san
dsto
ne 3
at T
T. P
anel
2 a
nd th
e ph
otog
raph
dep
ict t
he b
ase
of th
e ch
anne
l with
a 2
× 4
.5-c
m S
tego
saur
us v
erte
brae
, with
sp
over
lain
by
a th
in
inte
rval
of r
ippl
es, f
ollo
wed
by
st. B
. arc
hite
ctur
e pa
nels
and
pho
togr
aphs
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
4 a
t TT.
Pan
el 1
and
pho
togr
aph
show
s th
e en
tire
3-m
thic
knes
s of
cha
nnel
4. n
ote
silic
a-re
plac
emen
t-fr
ont v
isib
le a
s da
rk, b
ette
r-ce
men
ted
area
s of
cha
nnel
san
dsto
ne 4
abo
ve r
ight
. cha
nnel
3 p
anel
1 il
lust
rate
s co
mm
on fo
ssil
bone
s an
d bo
ne fr
agm
ents
up
30-
× 45
-cm
. mud
ston
e an
d ch
ert p
ebbl
es
occu
r thr
ough
out c
hann
el. B
urro
ws
are
0.25
to 0
.5 c
m. c
hann
el 3
, Pan
el 2
illu
stra
tes
isol
ated
trou
gh c
ross
-bed
s co
ntai
ning
whi
te m
ud c
hips
and
abu
ndan
t din
osau
r bon
e fr
agm
ents
. cha
nnel
4, p
anel
1
show
s tr
ough
cro
ss-b
eds
cont
aini
ng g
rave
l lag
. san
dsto
ne is
par
tially
repl
aced
by
silic
a in
pat
ches
Pan
els
1 an
d 2
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
3 a
t TT
Pan
els
1 an
d 2
of c
hann
el s
ands
tone
4 a
t TT
f c
Red
mud
ston
e
123 2.8
0 m
12
3
2Sp
Sh
St
Sh
St
Sh
Sx
Sh
St
Sh
13
1
3
7- x
23-
cm
10- x
20-
cm
dino
bon
e
0 m
St
Sp
5
0 m
24
22.3
1
69 8
Sp
set t
hick
ness
-7
, 8, 1
3 cm
60-c
m p
uffy
gre
en m
udst
one
Din
osau
rbo
ne0
m
dino
saur
bon
e
Ch
4 P
anel
1
Ch
4 P
anel
2
4
321
St
St
Sh
21
0 m
0 m1
3
Rib
& F
urro
w
St b
ecom
esm
alle
r set
s
Sr S
h
Sp35
-cm
poo
rly d
evel
oped
cal
iche
1.76
5
Ch
3, P
anel
1
1
0 m
0 m
24
6
6
7 St
Sp
SpSt
Sp
Sr
1.6
Cha
nnel
3 P
anel
2C
h 3,
Pan
el 2
Pho
to:
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne 4
A B
89Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
Much of the upper Brushy Basin at TT is typified by a 2–3-m thick marlstone that makes up much of the Mygatt-Moore dinosaur quarry (Fig. 9A) within predominantly floodplain and associated strata with a very low sandstone-to-fines ratio. The upper portion of the measured stratigraph-ic section is to the north of the main outcrop belt (Fig. 9B).
Fluvial system at Fruita Paleontological research area (FP)
The south side of FP exposes a 7th-order bounding sur-face between the Salt Wash and overlying Brushy Basin Members. 5th- and 4th-order bounding surfaces bracket the bottom and top of fluvial channel sandstones, respectively (Fig. 10A). The 7th-order bounding surface between the
Brushy Basin and Salt Wash members is near the break in slope of Al Look Hill (Fig. 10A). Erosive, flat to concave-up surfaces below major channel sandstones in the Salt Wash Member are 5th-order surfaces visible near the base of the mosaic in Figure 10A. Flat to convex-up surfaces at the top of these sandstone bodies are 4th-order surfaces. Note the difference between the more laterally continuous, thicker sandstones of the Salt Wash and the thinner, less laterally continuous sandstones in the Brushy Basin. Bounding sur-faces on the south side of Al Look Hill mostly continue through to the north side, which is the active side of FP pale-ontological investigations. Here, one can observe the lateral continuity of tabular-body, crevasse-splay siltstone/very fine-grained sandstones. George Callison’s small mammal quarry is in the mound of purple-gray mudstones and silt-stones in the left foreground (Fig. 10B).
A
B
Fig. 9. photographs of upper Brushy Basin Member strata from the section at TT
A. mygatt-moore dinosaur Quarry in 2-m thick marlstone and associated facies at 43 m. B. upper stratigraphic section. Arrow points to top of measured stratigraphic section. note channel sandstone (probably channel 3), approximately on strike from the east in middle foreground and the low sandstone to fines ratio of the strata
90 Kenneth G. GalliA
B
Fig.
10.
pho
togr
aphs
of b
oth
sout
h si
de a
nd m
ain
(nor
th) s
ide
of F
ruita
pal
eont
olog
ical
Are
a (F
p)
A. V
iew
look
ing
nort
h to
war
d th
e Bo
ok c
liffs
, fro
m th
e so
uth
side
of F
P. a
sev
enth
-ord
er b
ound
ing
surf
ace
lies
betw
een
salt
was
h an
d Br
ushy
Bas
in m
embe
rs, m
orris
on F
orm
atio
n. F
ifth-
and
four
th-
orde
r bo
undi
ng s
urfa
ces
brac
ket t
he b
otto
m a
nd to
p of
fluv
ial c
hann
el s
ands
tone
s, r
espe
ctiv
ely.
Ver
tical
line
s sh
ow th
e lo
catio
n of
the
mea
sure
d se
ctio
n. B
. FP
, loo
king
sou
th w
ith a
l loo
k H
ill in
the
cent
er. B
ound
ing
surf
aces
on
the
sout
h si
de o
f al l
ook
Hill
mos
tly c
ontin
ue th
roug
h to
this
sid
e. n
ote
the
late
ral c
ontin
uity
of t
abul
ar-b
ody,
cre
vass
e-sp
lay
silts
tone
/ver
y fin
e-gr
aine
d sa
ndst
ones
. G
eorg
e ca
lliso
n’s
smal
l-mam
mal
qua
rry
is in
the
mou
nd o
f pur
ple-
gray
mud
ston
es a
nd s
iltst
ones
in th
e le
ft fo
regr
ound
that
are
at t
he o
rang
e cr
evas
se-s
play
leve
l
91Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
The fluvial architecture of the 101 meters of the Brushy Basin strata at FP demonstrates that channel sandstones 1 to 8 lie within the lower Brushy Basin Member; channel sand-stone 9 lies near the contact between the lower and the upper Brushy Basin and channel sandstones 10 and 11 are within the upper Brushy Basin Member (Fig. 11). Note also that channel sandstone 2 is the most laterally extensive of all at a bit over 1 kilometer. Channel sandstones 1, 2, and 6/7 are
only separated by a few meters stratigraphically where they crop out at what is called the Parking Lot, in the eastern part of FP, but channel sandstone 2 occupies a lower stratigraphic level in western FP. Channel sandstone 6 occupies a higher stratigraphic level to the southwest in FP. Most other channel sandstones appear to lie at just one stratigraphic level, al-though, this point should be confirmed.
Channel Sandstone 2
Channel Sandstone 9
Channel SS 4ChannelSS 5
Channel SS 8
Channel SS 11
Channel SS 10
Channel SS 3
Channel SS 7/6
Channel Sandstone 1
Approximately 1 km
0
20
10
30
80
100
101m
40
60
met
ers
abov
e B
rush
y B
asin
/Sal
t Was
h C
onta
ct
Sr: flow to N70°E
Sp: flow: N30°W 27°NE
St: flow 12° to S70°ESp: flow: N50°W 24°E2 Cross-bed sets
1 Rib-and-Furrow
Xv = 67°N = 3L = 95%P = 0.001
66.9°
2 Cross-bed sets1 Ripple
Xv = 62°
N = 12
L = 77%
P = 0.001 62.2°
1 Pillow axis
Upper Brushy BasinMember
Lower Brushy Basin Member
Insert Map:
Fig. 11. Schematic Architecture of Brushy Basin channel sandstones at Fruita paleontological Research Area (Fp).
Blank areas are floodplain mudstones and associated facies (Element FF). channel sandstone 2 (Element cH); all other channel sandstone (Element cHr); thin crevasse splay deposits (Element cs) not shown in this schematic. insert map: FP channel sandstones, arrows show inferred paleoflow directions for channel sandstones 1-11 (Kirkland, 2006). usGs topo 7 ½ minute quadrangle map for mack, colorado
92 Kenneth G. Galli
Cha
nnel
San
dsto
ne 1
Lev
ee d
epos
its w
ith c
evas
se s
play
s
coar
se sa
ndsto
ne
Joint
1
1.02.0
23
45
5.5 m
Sp
brow
n coa
rse ss
brow
n coa
rse ss
very
coar
secg
l- vc s
s
cong
lomer
atic s
sco
nglom
erati
c f-m
ss
cgl c
-vc ss
cgl-s
s
fine-
mediu
m ss
cgl-c
ssbn
m-c
ss
c
m-c s
sSh
Shcg
l-ss
fine s
s
mediu
m-co
arse
sand
stone
mediu
m-co
arse
sand
stone
SpSx
m-vc
ss w
ith gr
anule
s
mediu
m ss
fine s
ands
tone
mediu
m sa
ndsto
nefin
e-me
dium
ss
set b
ack
gran
ule cg
lc-v
ery c
oarse
ss
0.51.5
cgl-s
s cong
lomer
atic
coar
se-ve
ry co
arse
ss
med s
sme
d-co
arse
sand
stone
fine s
s
cong
lmer
atic c
-vc sa
ndsto
ne
N50°
E, 22
°NW
N70E
S70W
5
5flood
plain
muds
tone
flood
plain
muds
tone
Fig.
12.
Fru
ita p
aleo
ntol
ogic
al A
rea,
Bru
shy
Basi
n ch
anne
l san
dsto
ne 1
and
ass
ocia
ted
leve
e de
posi
ts w
ith c
reva
sse
spla
ys
“5”
mar
ks th
e fif
th-o
rder
bou
ndin
g su
rfac
es a
t the
bas
e of
fluv
ial c
hann
el s
ands
tone
s
93Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
The sedimentary structures of channel sandstone 1 (Blue Channel) at FP are largely obscured by bioturbation from plant roots and burrows. Only one or two fining-upward se-quences were observed and this channel is medium-very coarse-grained sandstone, coarser than fine-medium-grained channel sandstone 2. Small channel forms are all but absent in channel sandstone 1. The map patterns of channel 1 and all other channels at FP except channel sandstone 2 are rela-tively straight. Sandstone fills the channel form and two 5th-order bounding surfaces mark the bases of two channels within channel sandstone 1. No lateral-accreting surfaces (LAS) were observed; the channel trends N70°E. No mud drapes are present but some sandstone bodies are topped by fine- to very fine-grained sandstone. Channel scours are nu-merous with relief on the order of 10–15-cm. Large, mostly horizontal burrows or roots are common, mostly filled with coarse-grained sandstone but some with dark mudstone. The thicknesses of the channel fills within channel 1 decrease up-section; from the base up, the thicknesses are 0.54, 0.43, 0.42, 0.18, 0.12 to 1.0 m. Grain-size trends are hard to dis-cern. The sandstone is medium to coarse-grained, silica-re-placed and chert-cemented in places. Poikilitic chert occurs in places, mostly in the middle and upper part of the channel. Most units thin to the east; upper units pinch-out to the east. A paleocurrent measured from Sp in the basal, conglomer-atic, medium-grained sandstone yielded an azimuth towards 320° (Fig. 12). Most of the lower Brushy Basin strata at FP show extensive floodplain mudstones and ribbon channel sandstones (Fig. 13A).
Channel sandstone 2, near one of its bends, is oriented to the west and then turns north where the channel takes a 90° turn and has associated well-developed levee deposit with
crevasse-splay deposits cutting through. The color change (CC) marking the division between lower and upper Brushy Basin strata is just below the base of the channel. The azi-muth of paleoflow of channel 8 was 66.9° (to the northeast) (Fig. 14). The architecture of channel sandstone 8 is similar to many of the channel sandstones at FP, which range in thickness from 1.5 to 4.5 m (channel 4), averaging 2.5 m. Sedimentary structures are heavily bioturbated. The fill of channel 8 is similar to channel 1 and no fining-upward se-quences are present. Eight of the 11 channel scour fills with-in channel 8 are single story with non-systematic fills of 7–30-cm thick, planar cross-beds produced by downriver migration of linguoid bars that prograded at or near bankfull discharge. Paleoflow direction for channel 8 is to N67°E based on three readings (Fig. 14).
As with channels 1 and 2 at TT, each FP channel, except channel 2, has a consistent within-channel paleocurrent flow direction; in most cases the channel sandstone form is a rib-bon. Table 2 shows the proportions of sedimentary structures within FP and TT channel sandstones. Channel 2 at FP has a lower proportion of planar cross-bed sets than most chan-nels at TT. FP channel 2 also has a much higher proportion of ripple cross-lamination than any of the TT channels. The architecture of channel sandstone 2 differs from channel 1 by: (1) finer grain size, (2) abundant fining-upward sequenc-es, (3) abundant small channel scours filled by fining-upward sequences, (4) abundant dinosaur bones, including a long bone lying on a bedding plane oriented parallel to the flow, (5) common mud drapes, (6) multi-colored chert granule and fine pebbles at the base of many channels, and (7) sandstone pillows in a few places. Twelve paleocurrent readings indi-cate that flow was variable, averaging towards 62° (north-
A B
Fig. 13. lower Brushy Basin floodplain features at Fruita paleontological Area (Fp)
A. Extensive exposure of floodplain mudstones and ribbon channel sandstones, with low sandstone to fines ratio. B. crevasse splay-levee system associated with channel sandstone 2
94 Kenneth G. Galli
Chan
nel S
ands
tone 2
Chan
nel
Sand
stone
8
X v = 62°
N = 1
2L =
77%
P = 0.
001
62.2
2 Cro
ss-b
ed se
ts1 R
ipple
1 Pillo
w ax
is
Arch
itectu
ral B
ound
ing S
urfac
e Ran
k d1
– din
osau
r bon
e
Pres
erve
d roo
ts/bu
rrow
on ba
se of
chan
nel c
hann
el is
unde
rlain
by pu
ffy, a
sh-ri
ch pu
rple
muds
tone
1 P
aleoc
urre
nt Re
ading
20
01
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
16 m
1
Spfin
e san
dston
efin
e san
dston
e
fine s
s210
cm
13 cm
c18 cm
c ss
St
m-c s
s
Sr
ff
ff
Sxm-
c ss
poro
us
fine-
mediu
m sa
ndsto
ne
gree
n silty
fine s
ands
tone
mud-
drap
es
f ss
St co
set
mfm
m
m-c s
s
m-c s
s
f ssf s
s
f ss
30 cm
2
22
2
m-c s
s
SpSt8
6
St
4
fine-
mediu
msa
ndsto
ne
m-c s
sm-
c ss
f ss
f ssc
c
basa
l rip-
ups
2–2.5
cmd2
d1d3
d4d6
d8
d9d7
d5
d10
Srf s
s
1St co
set
Stbr
own
gree
ndino b
one
gran
ule-co
nglom
erati
c m ss
7
burro
wed t
op5
fine s
ands
tone
mud d
rape
3
2 m
muds
tone c
last
fine-
mediu
m ss
w/ 6m
m cla
sts
f ss
SrSp
Sr
Sr
St
ShSh
SpSr
coar
se-ve
ry co
arse
ss
fine s
ands
tone
fine s
ands
tone
fine s
ands
tone
m
f-m ss
fine s
s
fine s
s
fine s
spo
ssibl
e pillo
wf-m
ssm
ss
vc ss
-cgl
2 Cro
ss-b
ed se
ts1 R
ib-an
d-Fu
rrow
X v = 67°
N = 3
L = 95
%P
= 0.00
1
66.9
°
<----
Cha
nnel
2
Chan
nel 8
flow
---->
X7
Brus
hy B
asin
Memb
erSa
lt Was
h Mem
ber
CCCh
anne
l 8 P
aleoc
urre
nt Da
ta:1.
Sp N
80°
W, 2
6° N
E (1
4-cm
thick
)2.
Rib
and F
urro
w: Tr
ends
N50
°E3.
St T
rend
s 21°
to N
10°E
12
3
StSt
St
St
St
Sp
calic
he cl
ast
7 cm
12 cm
14 cm
40 cm
30 cm
20 cm
26 cm
18 cm
28 cm 12
3
paleo
curre
nt re
ading
0
01.2
1.5 m 1
4 m
calic
he cl
asts
A
B
Fig.
14.
Cha
nnel
san
dsto
nes
2 an
d 8
arch
itect
ure
at F
ruita
pal
eont
olog
ical
Are
a (F
p)
A. a
rchi
tect
ure
pane
l and
pal
eocu
rren
t ros
e of
cha
nnel
2 a
t FP
nort
heas
t of “
Park
ing
lot.”
B. P
hoto
grap
h (c
ourt
esy
of J
. Kirk
land
). ch
anne
l 2 fl
ows
wes
t and
then
ben
ds to
nor
th a
t circ
led
X. s
even
th
orde
r bou
ndin
g su
rfac
e is
bou
ndar
y be
twee
n sa
lt w
ash
and
over
lyin
g Br
ushy
Bas
in m
embe
rs, m
orris
on F
orm
atio
n at
FP.
Pho
togr
aph
and
arch
itect
ure
pane
l sho
w th
at c
hann
el 8
flow
ed to
nor
thea
st
95Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
east). Within the area of study, channel sandstone 2 con-tained ten sizable dinosaur bones, many lying along bedding surfaces and several as part of a coarse sand-gravel lag de-posit, while others are within fine- to medium-grained sand-stone. Bones range in size from 2 × 2 cm to as large as 7 × 88 cm. The basal 40–60 cm of the channel contains most of the bones (Fig. 14A).
No mudcracks were observed, which may argue against the climate being semi-arid or alternatively they may be missing due to low preservation potential during flash floods. Some channel sandstones, such as channel 7 at FP, contain mud drapes near their tops as well as the usual mud clasts in the basal lag.
As each flood-cycle waned, the mud mantled the lower-flow-regime bedforms. This probably indicates seasonal variations in discharge. At times a channel shifted abruptly, cutting into older channel sands, producing an amalgamated channel body, for example in channels 6 and 7 at FP.
Upper Brushy Basin floodplain strata from 46.5 to 50.4 m in the Brushy Basin Member contain a crevasse-splay deposit and ash zone II (Figs 15A, B). The thick puffy-weathering ash-rich floodplain mudstones above the cre-vasse splay suggests a retreat of the river channel away from the section occurred.
Blue
Red
Orange
Channel 7
Channel 6
Yellow
Ash II
A
B
Fig. 15. Typical architecture of the lower Brushy Basin Member at Fruita paleontological Area (Fp)
A. Photograph showing lowermost lower Brushy Basin strata, with several flagged crevasse-splay deposits noted (blue, red, orange) and a faint yellow splay barely visible, with an amalgamated channel sandstone 6/7 at the top. Field assistant John Bailey for scale. B. Floodplain strata from 46.5 to 50.4 m in the Brushy Basin member at FP. yellow-flagged crevasse splay is indicated by the arrow. ash ii is at top of photo. Thick puffy-weathering ash-rich floodplain mudstones above the crevasse splay suggest a retreat of the river channel away from the section. Jacob staff is 1.5 m
96 Kenneth G. Galli
CC
A
CB
Fig.
16.
pho
togr
aphs
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
Mem
ber a
rchi
tect
ure
at e
cho
Cany
on
A. P
hoto
grap
h an
d ar
chite
ctur
e of
com
plet
e Ec
ho c
anyo
n se
ctio
n, s
how
ing
maj
or b
ound
ing
surf
aces
. B. E
cho
cany
on. A
pato
saur
us fe
mur
with
in c
hann
el s
ands
tone
2 d
isco
vere
d by
aut
hor.
cent
er o
f bo
ne w
as s
cave
nged
and
is n
ow fi
lled
with
san
d an
d gr
avel
. C. P
hoto
grap
h fr
om E
cho
cany
on d
ry w
ash
show
s co
lor
chan
ge (
cc)
betw
een
low
er B
rush
y Ba
sin
stra
ta a
third
of t
he w
ay fr
om th
e ba
se
of th
e ph
otog
raph
. The
col
or c
hang
e oc
curs
just
abo
ve a
cre
vass
e-sp
lay
zone
. The
puf
fy w
eath
erin
g as
pect
of t
he v
olca
nic
ash-
rich
mud
ston
es is
wel
l dis
play
ed
97Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
Fluvial system at Echo canyon (Ec)
Echo Canyon shows the largest scale bounding surfaces seen in this study (Fig. 16A). Morrison Fm. strata are brack-eted by 8th-order surfaces of discontinuity: (1) the regional J-5 unconformity over the Jurassic Summerville Formation and (2) the regional K-1 unconformity beneath the Creta-ceous Burro Canyon Formation. 7th-order surfaces are the boundaries between the Tidwell, Salt Wash, and Brushy Ba-sin members of the Morrison Formation; these surfaces typi-cally form over intervals of 105 to 106 years (Miall, 1996) and are traceable over the extent of the members, an area slightly smaller than the total Morrison Formation.
A possible paleovalley observed within Brushy Basin strata high above the EC dry wash, oriented approximately N 20° E, contains several lens-shaped channel bodies that sit in a larger scale (possibly 7th order boundary) concave-up surface that is potentially a paleovalley with the long axis parallels the dry wash. The sandstone bodies indicate that the streams that produced them flowed most likely eastward.
The author discovered an Apatosaurus femur in the 3 to 4-m thick channel sandstone 2 at EC (Fig. 16B). This bone is silica-cemented into the sandstone and the central portion is filled with sand and gravel. There is a 1-m scour at the base of Channel 2, indicating that the river scoured deep into the underlying floodplain mudstones.
The color change between lower Brushy Basin and upper Brushy Basin strata a third of the way from the base. The color change occurs just above a crevasse splay zone. The puffy-weathering aspect of the volcanic ash-rich mudstones is well displayed. The “clay change” between the red-brown floodplain mudstones below and the gray, puffy-weathering, ash-rich, smectitic mudstones above occurs twenty-four me-ters within the Brushy Basin Member middle to upper Brushy Basin strata (Fig. 16C).
inTErPrETaTions
Fluvial complex at Trail Through Time (TT)
Channel 2 is single-story, with a non-systematic fill of 15–48-cm-thick planar cross-beds. After the channel was scoured out, migration of trains of linguoid bars at or near bankfull discharge constructed the cosets of planar cross-bed sets, with flow consistently to the southeast. The small vari-ation of individual paleocurrent azimuths from the mean suggests an anastomosing pattern. Reactivation surfaces within the cosets reflect separate floods or fluctuations in a flood. The second story of channel 2 is also filled with a non-systematic fill of planar cross-strata and trough cross-strata as well as upper flow regime horizontally laminated sandstone.
Commonly, the base of a horizontally-laminated sand-stone cuts into a coset of cross-beds, implying shallower flow depth and/or higher velocity. Evidently, there was “flashy” discharge, probably due to seasonal precipitation. With no grasses present, flash floods swept across the flood-plains toward the channels. Lacking depth-to-width ratios for the channels, as well as laterally accreting (LA) macro-forms, quantitative estimates of the hydrology and morphol-ogy of the rivers are not possible. However, because gravel is transported at velocities above about 1.0 m per second, the flow rate was mainly lower than this, assuming the availabil-ity of gravel, particularly intraclasts. Gravel lags can occur when flow is 0.4–0.7 m/s (Einsele, 1992).
An analysis of the channel sandstones at TT and all but channel sandstone 2 at FP show the following features in abundance: (1) low sandstone to fines ratio, (2) ribbon sand-stone geometry, (3) highly variable paleocurrents, (4) evi-dence of stable vegetated islands, and (5) single-channel form. Additionally, mature caliche paleosols are common. Features sometimes present are: (1) multi-story channels, (2) crevasse-splay deposits, (3) fining-up channel fills. Features absent for the most part, are: (1) LA or downstream-accret-ing macroforms (DA) elements, (2) levee deposits, point-bar sequences, (3) sheet sandstone geometry, and (4) large-scale sandy bedforms and gravel bedform elements (Table 3).
The rapid changes between lower flow regime (LFR) and upper flow regime (UFR) structures in the channel sand-stones imply that the rivers were “flashy,” low-gradient channels that reached maximum discharge several times per year during the wet season. The rapid alternation of struc-tures of the LFR and UFR can be seen in Figures 5 to 8, which contain St, Sp, Sr, and Sh.
Channel sandstone 1 allows the following interpreta-tions. The paleoflow was to the northeast (47°) in a small, fairly fast-flowing river, with a medium-sandstone to fine-gravel basal thalweg lag of rounded floodplain and caliche clasts. Most flow was in the lower flow regime, with current velocities from 0.4–0.7 m/s (Ashley, 1990). The 23% upper flow regime structures in channel 1 indicate some upper flow regime transport at 0.7–1.2 m/s, for example, when the rip-up clasts were produced, probably by bank collapse. Water depth was shallow as indicated by the 1.3-m thickness of the channel sandstone.
The rivers at TT and at FP (excepting channel 2) were narrow and shallow. During floods they streams overflowed the floodplain and deposited crevasse-splay silts and very fine sands near the channels. Crevasse splays are particularly well developed at FP, where many of them can be correlated to specific channel sandstones (J. Kirkland, person. comm., 1992, 2006).
In summary, the fluvial style at TT has features of both meandering and anastomosing rivers, but tends more toward
Fig.
16.
pho
togr
aphs
of B
rush
y Ba
sin
Mem
ber a
rchi
tect
ure
at e
cho
Cany
on
A. P
hoto
grap
h an
d ar
chite
ctur
e of
com
plet
e Ec
ho c
anyo
n se
ctio
n, s
how
ing
maj
or b
ound
ing
surf
aces
. B. E
cho
cany
on. A
pato
saur
us fe
mur
with
in c
hann
el s
ands
tone
2 d
isco
vere
d by
aut
hor.
cent
er o
f bo
ne w
as s
cave
nged
and
is n
ow fi
lled
with
san
d an
d gr
avel
. C. P
hoto
grap
h fr
om E
cho
cany
on d
ry w
ash
show
s co
lor
chan
ge (
cc)
betw
een
low
er B
rush
y Ba
sin
stra
ta a
third
of t
he w
ay fr
om th
e ba
se
of th
e ph
otog
raph
. The
col
or c
hang
e oc
curs
just
abo
ve a
cre
vass
e-sp
lay
zone
. The
puf
fy w
eath
erin
g as
pect
of t
he v
olca
nic
ash-
rich
mud
ston
es is
wel
l dis
play
ed
98 Kenneth G. Galli
anastomosing. Only panel 2 of channel sandstone 4 (Fig. 8B) is close to an ideal point-bar sequence. River discharge was flashy, with rapid changes in velocity and/or depth, produc-ing interbedded upper flow regime beds and lower flow re-gime planar and trough cross-beds with rare ripples. River depths were variable, based on the heights of individual St and Sp sets (4 to 36 cm) and thicknesses of the channel sand-stone bodies (1.0 to 5.2 m). Avulsions were common, with the hard, underlying caliche horizons contributing to a ten-dency to avulse. The few fining-up channel sequences reflect progressive filling, but also may be due, in part, to decelerat-ing flow during a major flood. The anastomosing rivers probably had some meander reaches. Paleocurrent flow vari-ability is much higher in channel sandstones 3 and 4 than in channel sandstones 1 and 2, which might indicate a change in the fluvial regime through time at TT. These sandstones bracket the lower Brushy Basin-upper Brushy Basin contact and may indicate that the style of rivers changed in response to the increasing volcanic ash input.
Migrating subaqueous two-dimensional lingoid bars un-der lower flow regime conditions formed the planar cross-bed sets. Three-dimensional sinuous-crested dunes formed the larger trough cross-bed sets. Horizontal laminations in me-dium- to coarse-grained sandstones, some with parting-step lineation, are upper flow regime forms. A braided river at TT is unlikely because of a low ratio of sandstone to mudstone (31 : 69), the common to locally abundant caliche paleo sols, lack of downstream-accreting macroforms and gravel, the ab-sence of large-scale sandy or gravelly bedforms, and especially, the lack of numerous channel cross-sections.
The Brushy Basin Member anastomosing river system (Fig. 17) is similar to the Rio Flumen section of the Oligio-Miocene Huesca Formation, Ebro Basin, Spain (Hirst, 1991). Hirst (1991) describes a ribbon-dominated alluvial architecture of a section along the east side of the Rio Flu-men approximately 3 km south of the basin margin. The cross section of this sequence is similar to that at TT. Ribbon sandstones are mired in floodplain mudstones. Some channel
Table 3Qualitative presence of sedimentologic and architectural features in Brushy Basin Member channel sandstones at Trail Through Time (TT),
and Channel Sandstone 2 at Fruita paleontological Area (Fp) compared to generalized anastomosing, meandering, and braided rivers
Item #
Possible features Features observed Typical features (from literature)
Channel SSs at TT
CH 2 at FP
Anastomosing Meandering Braided
1 Low sandstone to fines ratio + + + + + + + + –
2 Ribbon sandstone + + + / – + + – –
3 Highly variable paleocurrents + + + + + + + + –
4 Stable vegetated islands + + + + + – + / –
5 Abundant mature paleosols + + + + + –
6 Abundant LA or DA elements – – – + + + +
7 Multi-story channels + / – – + + + +
8 Crevasse-splay deposits + / – + + + + + –
9 Single channel + + + + + / – + + –
10 Levee deposits – + + – + + –
11 Point-bar deposits – + + – + + –
12 Fining up channel fill + / – + + + / – + + –
13 Sheet sandstone – – – + + –
14 Large-scale SB and GB elements – – – – + +
15 Low channel width to depth ratio ? ? + + –
16 High sinuosity ? + + + + + –
+ + abundant, + common, + / – sometimes present, – absent
99Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
stacking or amalgamation occurs, but most sandstone bodies are single-story or two-stories at most. The section at TT could possibly be part of a larger fluvial system that has nearly the dimensions and large-scale architecture of the Rio Flumen system. The Rio Flumen (Hirst, 1991) shares two things with the strata at TT: (1) the proximal strata are tectonically disrupted, and/or eroded away, and (2) regional correlation is imprecise, with the age of the sequence deter-mined by a few vertebrate horizons (Hirst, 1991). Until ash beds were recently dated (Kowallis et al., 1991), the same was true for TT. To this day, some of the Brushy Basin se-quence is not well-constrained and time-markers are hard to find.
Typical of anastomosing systems, the central, thick sand-stones commonly “wing-out,” a geometry present in channel sandstones 2 and 3 at TT (Fig. 5A). A sheet sandstone with poorly channelized flow, in a course with poorly defined banks, has a channel form that wedges out laterally without clear cutbanks (Hirst, 1991). Channels 2 and 4 at TT may be
of this type. This type of river channel commonly is filled with horizontally-laminated sandstones, as at the tops of channel 2 and part of channel 4 at TT. Hirst’s sheet sand-stones are the product of unconfined overbank flow, equiva-lent to the thin crevasse-splay sheet sandstones at TT and FP. These are wide relative to their thickness and lack cutbanks (Hirst, 1991).
The sequence at TT has predominantly ribbon-sand ge-ometry due to the stable river banks cut in mudstone. Bank collapse shed mud and caliche clasts that were incorporated in the basal lags during flood events (Fig. 7A). The moder-ately to well-developed caliche paleosols locally prevented river downcutting, resulting in avulsion from the shallow channel to a new one. This typically occurs when the chan-nel is filled to about 50% of the depth (Parker, pers. comm., 2002). At TT, small ponds and lakes dotted the landscape, yielding micritic limestone. Episodically, ash covered the landscape, so that at shallow burial depths some caliche and other paleosols were hardened to the silicified paleosols
Crevasse-splays (facies 10)
Channel sandstone
Volcanic ash bedCrevasse-splay deposit
Crevasse-splay deposit
2
MicriteCS
Channel sandstone (facies 7)Floodplain mudstone (facies 4)
Organic-rich, fossiliferous claystone-siltstone (facies 15)
Marlstone (facies 13)
Micrite (facies 2)
Carbonate nodules and caliche paleosols (facies 3 and 16)
Volcanic ash horizons (facies 1)
Facies developed on the floodplain Facies developed in/near the river
7
1
10 16
10
Caliche paleosol
Fig. 17. paleogeographic reconstruction of Brushy Basin anastomosing rivers at Trail Through Time (TT) and Fruita paleontological Area (Fp) and probably at echo Canyon (eC) (after Miall, 1985, river model 8)
100 Kenneth G. Galli
common at TT. Later, silica became more abundant, as evi-denced by the silica-replacement front(s) in channel sand-stone 4 (Fig. 8B) where the friable sandstone was converted to a hard silica-replaced sandstone and thus increasing the likelihood of preservation of dinosaur bones.
The anastomosing fluvial system of Figure 17 is similar to one for the Morrison strata in southwest Montana, where Cooley and Schmitt (1998) retrodict “a north flowing, low-gradient, mud and sand-dominated fluvial system.” Channel sandstones in their study area are “encased in extensive overbank-derived mudstone” as at TT and most of FP. They also interpret Morrison rivers as having rapid fluctuations in discharge.
Fluvial complex at Fruita Paleontological research area (FP)
Analysis of channel sandstone 2 at FP show the follow-ing abundant features: (1) low sandstone to fines ratio, (2) highly variable paleocurrents, (3) crevasse-splay deposits, (4) single channel geometry, (5) levee deposits, (6) fining-upward point-bar sequences, and (7) fining-upward channel fill. Common channel sandstone 2 features are: (1) mature paleosols, and (2) high sinuosity, and (3) highly bioturbated (stable vegetated islands) (Table 3). Even with FP’s excel-lent outcrop exposure, no lateral accreting or downstream accreting elements were observed within channel sandstone 2. This system is similar to the model for the Miocene Lower Freshwater Molasse of Switzerland (Platt and Keller, 1992).
I envision a small meandering river similar to the model 6, sand-bed meandering stream of Miall (1996) (Fig. 18). Abundant mudstone and caliche rip-up clasts in the basal lag deposits of channel sandstone 2 indicate that bank collapse was an important process. Although caliche paleosols are not as abundant at FP as at TT, the base of channel sandstone 2 directly overlies a 13-cm well-developed stage III-IV cali-che. The lowermost part of the FP channel sandstone 2 in Figure 14 contains most dinosaur bones.
Facies of channel sandstone 2 in common with the Low-er Freshwater Molasse are: levee, crevasse-channel, and crevasse-splay deposits, floodplain fines, and abandoned channels. Organic-rich, fossiliferous claystone and siltstone (facies 15) is locally abundant, and interpreted as a standing water body, such as an oxbow lake. The levee deposits de-scribed by Platt and Keller (1992) are a little larger than those at channel 2, which are on the order of centimeters thick, versus the 2–6 m-thick deposits of the Lower Fresh-water Molasse. The lateral extent is also smaller at FP.
It is possible that the north- to northeastward-flowing, meandering channel sandstone 2 represents a longitudinal trunk stream developed during the period of most persistent
humid climate and that the other channel sandstones at FP represent transverse streams that flowed directly away from the north-south oriented source area. Most of these other channel sandstones trend more or less from west to east. This arrangement puts channel 2 parallel to the north-south strike of the Morrison depositional basin. Kirkland (2006) interprets that the channel 2 river re-occupied the position of the channel 1 river. This is similar to a partially abandoned or avulsed channel of the Rio Colorado, Altiplano, Bolivia, that is seen to diverge away from the present-day channel (Donselaar et al., 2013). This is interpreted as a channel that was the direct precursor of the present-day active channel and was abandoned by avulsion.
It is possible that some of the other anastomosing streams may have fed other meandering streams that were either not preserved or were eroded away. Indeed, there is a “Ghost Channel” interpreted by Kirkland (2006) based on a map pattern of desert varnished individual boulders arranged in a pattern interpreted to be a ribbon river channel active be-tween the times of deposition of ribbon channel sandstones 9 and 10. These boulders possibly weathered out and are now found “high and dry” on the recent landscape.
Crevasse-splay deposits (facies 5, 10) were identified by concave-up channel floor (4th order surface) or nearly flat base, proximity to the main channel sandstone unit, and sheet-like bodies tens to hundreds of meters across and in some cases up to a kilometer, and approximately 10 or so cm thick that thin and pass laterally into element FF, overbank/floodplain fines. Both upward-coarsening and upward-fining successions may be present, indicating progradation or grad-ual abandonment, respectively (Miall, 1996). Therefore, channel sandstone 2 was deposited by a small, meandering, highly sinuous, river as inferred by the size of the oxbow-lake deposits, the crevasse-splays, and the spacing of the bends and their associated levee/crevasse-splay deposits.
The mass concentrations of dinosaur bones in channel sandstone 2 are present at the bends of the meandering river, evidently produced by a sequence similar to that described by Hubert and Panish (2000) for the formation of the dino-saur-bearing sandstone channel in the Morrison Formation on Dinosaur Ridge at Morrison, Colorado: (1) accumulation of bones along dry river bed during prolonged drought; (2) heavy rainfall produces flood waters that fill and overfill the channel and scour sand from its floor and the dinosaur bones and sand are transported down the river, along with pebble-sized mud and paleosol rip-up clasts; (3) rapid deposition of the sand and bones in the deeper parts of the channel, more likely to be preserved; (4) an interval of hours to a day of deposition results in the bones being covered within cross-bedded and/or horizontally-laminated sand, thus protecting them from decay or scavenging. Mass accumulations of di-nosaur bones in channel sandstones in the Morrison basin
101Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
occur at: (1) the outcrop at Dinosaur Ridge (Hubert, Panish, 2000); (2) the Carnegie quarry at Dinosaur National Monu-ment where there were two pulses to a flood or two closely-spaced floods (Bilbey et al., 1974; Lawton, 1977); (3) Dry Mesa Quarry 60 km south of Grand Junction, Colorado (Richmond, Morris, 1998); 4) the Bone Cabin quarry 16 km north of Como Bluff, Wyoming (Osborn, 1904); and 5) the Felch quarry at Garden Park, Colorado (Carpenter, 1998). A prolonged drought prior to deposition of channel sand-stone 2 is supported by the stage IV caliche that underlies the channel. This caliche has a nodular carbonate-plugged hori-zon about 13-cm thick, and required thousands of years of overall semi-aridity, a slow sedimentation rate, and seasonal precipitation.
The Brushy Basin Member at FP is unique in that it con-tains both dinosaur body fossils and theropod tracks (Kirk-land, 2006; Eriksen, 1976). The tracks are associated with the Main Callison Microvertebrate Quarry. Dinosaur tracks are also found at the bases of some channels (Engelmann, Hasiotis, 1999). Commonly, dinosaur-bearing formations contain either dinosaur tracks (as in the Portland Formation, Hartford Basin) or dinosaur bones, but not both. Possibly, many of the Brushy Basin subenvironments such as the pond/marsh facies (Kirkland, 2006) developed within is-lands that existed between the strands of the anastomosing
channels (Makaske, 2001). For example, the morphology of alluvial islands is a feature found in the anastomosing river system of the Solimes River of the Amazon basin (Baker, 1978) where there was a “saucer-like” geometry due to the bounding natural levees. Kirkland (2006) found his pond/marsh facies to occur at FP, always accompanying an under-lying ribbon sandstone in the case of channel sandstones 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 and that the facies association typified the lower two-thirds of the Brushy Basin Member at FP. Pos-sibly, this facies records evidence of islands that were subse-quently eroded away.
The Brushy Basin rivers, with the exception of channel 2 at FP, may have belonged to the organo-clastic system sub-type (Smith, Smith, 1980) of the type-1 cohesive-sediment anabranching rivers category of Nanson and Knighton (1996) and Knighton (1998). In this type of river system, shifting of channels occurs as a result of long-term, large, floodplain-scale via avulsion instead of the deposition or dis-section of within-channel bars (Knighton, 1998). The orga-no-clastic type of river was first described by Smith and Smith (1980) with respect to alluvial valleys near Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Ash-fall events were common throughout Brushy Basin time, especially during the deposition of the upper Brushy Basin Member. The possible correlation among the three
Oxbow lake in abandonedmeander (future clay plug) (facies 15)
Red-brown mudstone (facies 4)
Channelsandstone(facies 7)
Crevasse splays(facies 5, 10)
N
5
00 10
M
M
Facies 3, 16
Mud and caliche intraclasts form by bank collapse
Overbank muddeposits
Channel sand deposits
Crevasse splay/levee deposits
Ferns
Cycads
Roots
Soil horizon
Scouring
Conifers
Burrows
Carbonate nodules
2-D dunes (Sp)
3-D dunes (St)
Scours
Fig. 18. Meandering river reconstruction of Brushy Basin Member Channel Sandstone 2 at Fruita paleontological Area (Fp) (after McInerney, 1993, similar to Miall, 1996, river model 6: sand-bed meandering stream)
102 Kenneth G. Galli
TrailThrough
Time
Ch 1 level
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
K-1
green-gray /variegatedred-brown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
79
3
5
C I
EchoCanyon
C I
0
10
20
30
50
60
70
40
Top - 76K-1
FruitaPaleontologicalResearch Area
Ch 7
Ch 2
Ch 1
Ch 6
0 meters
10
20
30
50
60
40
70
80
90
100Top - 101K-1
LL
LL
L
LL
LLL
III
I L
II NC
NCNC
NC caliche
Thick
er, m
ore m
ature
calic
he pa
leoso
ls
- III
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
I - II
I - II
ASH I
silica-replaced limestones
ASH IV
HORIZON EQUIVALENT
Uppe
r Bru
shy
Basin
Mem
ber
COLORCHANGE
WEST EAST
16 km 23 km
ASH III
ASH II
ASH IV
ASH IV ASH IV
ASH III
ASH I
COLORCHANGE
North
60 km40200
CNM
GrandJunction
I-70
Colorad
o Rive
r
Fruita
FP
TT
EC
ASH II
567
8
910
11
12
11
10
13 13
9
8
7
432
1
14
5
3
2Lowe
r Bru
shy
Basin
Mem
ber
112
3
4
67
8
10
5
4
6
ASH III ASH II
12II - III
II - IIIIASH HORIZON I
~ quarry level
I
Covered intervalCI
L Micritic lake beds
II Stage of paleosol developmentNumber of paleosol horizon11
Noncalcareous paleosolNC
9
Fig. 19. Correlation among stratigraphic sections in this study
see Figure 2 for legend to facies patterns. The color change at 31 m at FP is the basis for correlation of: (1) color change, (2) zones of the channel sandstones, (3) paleosol horizons, (4) volcanic ash beds, and (5) positions of some thin lake beds
103Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
sections using the distinctive four volcanic ash bed zones is significant. It is probable that the capacity of some of the Brushy Basin rivers was taxed due to their becoming over-whelmed with fine ash. The distance west to the volcanic belt was about 800 km (Turner, Peterson, 2004). The signifi-cant increase in both the number of and the thickness of ash beds and puffy-weathering ashy mudstones of the upper Brushy Basin strata probably reflect an increase in volcan-ism at that time (Galli, 2003). Most bentonites similar to those observed are produced due to diagenetic alteration of the silicic vitric fallout ash (Slaughter, Earley, 1965). Indeed, Newell (1997) interpreted Brushy Basin sandstones of FP as being formed by suspended-load rivers where their carrying capacity was overwhelmed due to the large amount of vol-caniclastics coming in as both air-fall ash on floodplains and channels and that carried by the streams.
Avulsions were an important process by which the Brushy Basin rivers sculpted their floodplains and spread their load, especially during flooding events. Kirkland (2006) and Newell (1997) both retrodict that major flooding events were important in producing the observed levee-cre-vasse-splay systems associated with channel 2 at FP. Cre-vasse splay deposits were produced as sediment-choked stream water overtopped the levees and spread across the floodplain. In the process, they formed basal erosional sur-faces as well as built up the levees so that, eventually, the rivers stood higher the adjacent floodplain (Kirkland, 2006). Some aspects of the present-day Rio Colorado, Bolivia seem to be quite similar to those observed or inferred for the Brushy Basin rivers. In the Rio Colorado, near an avulsion point in the main river, the height of the abandoned-channel floor is 30- to 50-cm above the present-day river and it has a covering of sand with current ripples (Sr) that indicate a flow direction that is away from the present-day river (Donselaar et al., 2013). It is quite possible that the anasto-mosing rivers of the Brushy Basin Member are dryland riv-ers like the Rio Colorado. These rivers can occur in a wide range of climates, from arid to sub-humid (Donselaar et al., 2013). The low vertical accommodation space of the Brushy Basin Member is similar to that observed for the Rio Colo-rado, Bolivia, where it is thought to have caused a thin series of successive meandering-channel belt deposits, forming lat-erally to each other due to repeated channel avulsions (Don-selaar et al., 2013). At FP, perhaps all channel sandstones formed in a similar manner.
Fluvial complex at Echo canyon (Ec)
Echo Canyon channel sandstones are less accessible than those present at TT and FP. A channel sandstone that may be channel 1 within the Brushy Basin Member or the top sand-
stone of the Salt Wash Member is located high above the dry wash at the base of Echo Canyon. The lens shape and the channel width is estimated to be 3–5-m at its thickest, thin-ning to 1.5–2.5-m thick at either end. The channel is under-lain by floodplain mudstones and three crevasse-splay de-posits that are most likely related to flood events associated with this channel. There is a possible paleovalley that has two to three channel sandstones within it. The lens shape and low sandstone to fines ratio at EC also argue for an anasto-mosing stream system. However, the shape and size of this channel could also be produced perhaps by a meandering stream oriented longitudinally with respect to the viewer.
regional Interpretations and probable correlations
The three localities provide a nearly east-west cross-sec-tion orthogonal to the N–S-trending source area to the west. The correlations shown in Figure 19 for TT and FP are con-sistent with those of Kirkland (2006).
pAleOgeOgRAphIC ReCONSTRUCTION
FLuvIAL StrAtA
Most of the channel sandstones formed as anastomosing rivers that crossed muddy floodplains. These sandstone bod-ies are typically 1–3 m thick but reach 5 m; most are single story and do not meander where plan view can be seen. The abundant pebbles of floodplain red-brown mudstone and caliche paleosols along the channel floors show that erosion and collapse of the mud banks were common. No lateral ac-cretion surfaces were found and the channels have a non-systematic fill of lithofacies. Meander-channel sandstones are rare, but channel sandstone 2 at FP is the most prominent example. This sandstone body has a sinuous outcrop pattern and small channel forms that typically fine up from medium/coarse to fine gravel size to fine/very fine-grained sand. Lev-ee and crevasse-splay units are associated with the channel bends.
In both the lower and upper divisions, the mudstones can be definitively assigned a floodplain origin rather than playa/playa-lake origin because: (1) they are mostly non-sandy and rarely laminated; (2) where sandy, the sand content decreas-es away from channel sandstones and levee deposits; (3) the levee bodies thin and fine away from the channel sandstones; and (4) ripple cross-lamination is rare.
The Brushy Basin paleo-landscape was an open plain with scattered vegetation and distinct wet and some pro-longed dry seasons, and where the trees and shrubs were concentrated along the river courses. Dinosaurs roamed the
104 Kenneth G. Galli
riparian ecosystems and rare scattered bones are preserved in anastomosing-river channel sandstones. Major accumula-tions of bones are restricted to the pools at three bends of meandering-river channel sandstone 2 at FP where preserva-tion potential was enhanced.
PalEoclimaTE
In general, the paleoclimate during accumulation of the Brushy Basin strata was semi-arid to sub-humid, but there undoubtedly were many short and long-term fluctuations in precipitation. In Late Jurassic time, the study area was slightly south of its present latitude, with strong westerlies. The variegated floodplain mudstones of the upper division contain numerous non-calcareous and calcareous paleosols that vary from incipient scattered calcite nodules to stage III caliche. The caliche horizons are best developed at TT and FP, and to a lesser extent at EC. The caliche paleosols imply semi-aridity and seasonal precipitation, particularly for the upper division.
A 70-cm cherty limestone near the top of the Brushy Ba-sin at Dinosaur National Monument was cited as an occur-rence of Magadiite-type chert (Bilbey, 1991). However, this unit contains stromatolites and ostracods, and is evidently a lacustrine limestone with volcanic ash that altered to smec-tite. A 50- to 70-cm silicified limestone near the top of the Brushy Basin sections examined in this study is also a mic-ritic limestone partly replaced by silica. Furthermore, the clay-mineral assemblages in the floodplain mudstones, cali-ches, and micrites do not contain evaporite-type minerals, for example, zeolites, Mg-smectite, palygorskite, and sepio-lite. Due to the small amount of illite, the proportion of the 1Md soil illite was not determined (Srodon, Eberl, 1984). However, most illite is degraded, presumably 1Md. Detrital kaolinite was a minor detrital clay. No arid-region, Maga-diite-type chert was found in any of the strata. This precludes an arid climate interpretation.
CONClUSION
The 85-m Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Forma-tion in and around Fruita, Colorado is dominated by a 30-m lower division dominated by red-brown mudstone and a 55-m upper division dominated by variegated smectitic mudstones of floodplain origin. The fluvial system may have been similar to a dryland river system that commonly is de-posited under conditions of very low gradient and accomo-dation space, within a back-bulge basin. River-channel sand-stones are embedded in the mudstones and tend to have cut
downward to resistant caliche paleosol horizons. Four zones of altered volcanic ash appear at approximately the same stratigraphic level in all three sections; these may allow correlation among Brushy Basin strata within western Colorado.
Abundant pebbles of floodplain red-brown mudstone and caliche paleosols along the channel floors show that erosion and collapse of the mud banks were common. No lateral ac-cretion surfaces were found and the channels have a non-systematic fill of lithofacies. In both the lower and upper di-visions, the mudstones are of floodplain origin rather than playa/playa-lake origin. Features diagnostic of playa/playa-lakes are absent.
The overbank fines (FF) architectural element is the dominant element at all localities and contains the majority of the observed lithofacies. Major sandstone ribbon element (CHR) is the next most prevalent element and contains all lithofacies of the channel sandstones with a straight geome-try and exhibiting very few fining upward cycles. Most of these channel sandstones are found in the lower Brushy Ba-sin Member. Channel sandstone 2 at FP is the only instance of the major channel sandstone element (CH). Both CHR and CH elements grade or pinch out into the associated FF element. Minor sandstone sheet element (CS) as seen by crevasse-splay and levee deposits are common at FP an fair-ly common at TT and less so at EC.
The Brushy Basin paleo-landscape was an open plain with scattered vegetation and distinct wet and potentially prolonged dry seasons, and where the trees and shrubs were concentrated along the river courses. Dinosaurs roamed the riparian environments and rare scattered bones are preserved in anastomosing-river channel sandstones. Major accumula-tions of bones are restricted to the pools at three bends of meandering-river channel sandstone 2 at FP where preserva-tion potential was enhanced. In general, the paleoclimate during accumulation of the Brushy Basin strata was semi-arid to subhumid.
Acknowledgments. The author thanks John F. Hubert and Richard Yuretich (University of Massachusetts Am-herst), and James I. Kirkland, Harley Armstrong and David Wolny for assistance in the field. Funding for this research came from the American Federation of Mineralogical Socie-ties and the Radke Award, Fierman Award and Hall Awards from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Geosciences. Chief Rangers Hank Schok and Patrick Per-rotti provided logistical support at Colorado National Monu-ment. This manuscript was markedly improved by careful editorial guidance from Lawrence Tanner and an anonymous reviewer.
105Fluvial Architecture Element Analysis of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, western Colorado, USA
ReFeReNCeS
ALLEN J.R.L., 1983 — Studies in fluviatile sedimentation: bars, bar complexes and sandstone sheets (low-sinuosity braided streams) in the Brownstones (L. Devonian), Welsh Borders. Sedimentary Geology, 33: 237–293.
ASHLEY G.M., 1990 — Classification of large-scale subaqueous bedforms: a new look at an old problem. Journal of Sedimen-tary Petrology, 60: 160–172.
BAKER V.R., 1978 — Adjustment of fluvial systems to climate and source terrain in tropical and subtropical environments. In: Fluvial sedimentology (Ed. A.D. Miall): 211–230. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 5, Calgary.
BILBEY S.A., 1991 — Stratigraphy and sedimentary petrology of the Upper Triassic–Lower Cretaceous rocks at the Cleveland-Lloyd dinosaur quarry with a comparison to the Dinosaur Na-tional Monument quarry [PhD dissertation]. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
BILBEY S.A., KERNS R.L. Jr., BOWMAN J.T., 1974 — Petro-logy of the Morrison Formation, Dinosaur Quarry quadrangle, Utah. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Special Studies, 48: 1–15.
BRENNER R.L., 1983 — Late Jurassic tectonic setting and paleo-geography of western interior, North America. In: Mesozoic paleogeography of west-central United States (eds M.W. Rey-nolds, E.D. Dolly): 119–132. Rocky Mountain Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.
CADIGAN R.A., 1967 — Petrology of the Morrison Formation in the Colorado Plateau region. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 556.
CARPENTER K., 1998 — Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Mor-rison Formation near Cañon City, Colorado. In: The Morrison Formation: An interdisciplinary study (eds K. Carpenter et al.). Modern Geology, 23: 407–426.
COOLEY J.T., SCHMITT J.G., 1998 — An anastomosed fluvial system in the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of south-west Montana. Modern Geology, 22: 171–208.
DeCELLES P.G., GILES K.A., 1996 — Foreland basin systems. Basin Research, 8: 105–123.
DONSELAAR M.E., CUEVAS GOZALO M.C., MOYANO S., 2013 — Avulsion processes at the terminus of low-gradient semi-arid fluvial systems: Lessons from the Rio Colorado, Alti-plano endorheic basin, Bolivia. Sedimentary Geology, 283: 1–14.
DYNI J.R., 1976 — Trioctahedral smectite in the Green River For-mation, Duchesne County, Utah. United States Geological Sur-vey Professional Paper, 967.
EINSELE G., 1992 — Sedimentary Basins: Evolution, facies, and sediment budget. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
ENGELMANN G.F., HASIOTIS S.T., 1999 — Deep dinosaur tracks in the Morrison Formation: Sole marks that are really sole marks. In: Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah (Ed. D.D. Gil-lette): 179–183. Utah Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Publi-cation, 99-1.
ERIKSEN L., 1976 — Salvage excavations of dinosaur remains at the Fruita quarries. Report to Grand Junction Office of Bureau
of Land Management, on file at Museum of Western Colorado, Grand Junction.
GALLI K.G., 2003 — Sedimentology and petrology of the Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation, (Late Jurassic), western Col-orado [PhD dissertation]. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
GIBBS R.J., 1971 — X-ray diffraction mounts. In: Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology (Ed. R.E. Carver): 531–539. Wiley, New York.
GOOD S.C., 2004 — Paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic sig-nificance of freshwater bivalves in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Western Interior, USA. Sedimentary Geology, 167: 163–176.
GREENE-KELLEY R., 1973 — Clay mineralogy. Springer -Verlag, New York.
HINTZE L.F., 1988 — Geologic history of Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, Special Publication, 7.
HIRST J.P.P., 1991 — Variations in alluvial architecture across the Oligio-Miocene Huesca fluvial system, Ebro Basin, Spain. In: The three-dimensional facies architecture of terrigenous clastic sediments and its implications for hydrocarbon discov-ery and recovery (eds A.D. Miall, N. Tyler): 111–121: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology). Concepts in Sedimento-logy and Paleontology, 3. Tulsa, Oklahoma.
HUBERT J.H., PANISH P.T., 2000 — Sedimentology and diagen-esis of the dinosaur bones exposed at Dinosaur Ridge along Alameda Parkway in the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic), Morrison, Colorado. The Mountain Geologist, 37: 73–89.
KIRKLAND J.I., 2006 — Fruita Paleontological Area (Upper Ju-rassic, Morrison Formation), western Colorado: an example of terrestrial taphofacies analysis. New Mexico Museum of Natu-ral History and Science Bulletin, 36: 67–95.
KNIGHTON A.D., 1998 — Fluvial forms and processes: a new perspective. Arnold Publisher, London.
KOWALLIS B.J., CHRISTIANSEN E.H., DEINO A.L., PETER-SON F., TURNER C.E., KUNK M.J., OBRADOVICH J.D., 1998 — The age of the Morrison Formation. Modern Geology, 22: 235–260.
KOWALLIS B.J., CHRISTIANSEN E.H., DEINO A.L., 1991 — Age of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation, Colorado Plateau, western USA. Cretaceous Research, 12: 483–493.
LAWTON T.F., 1977 — Taphonomy of the dinosaur quarry, Dino-saur National Monument. University of Wyoming, Contribu-tions to Geology, 15: 119–126.
LITWIN R.J., TURNER C.E., PETERSON F., 1998 — Palyno-logical evidence on the age of the Morrison Formation, Western Interior, USA. Modern Geology, 22: 297–319.
LOHMAN S.W., 1965 — Geology and artesian water supply of the Grand Junction area, Colorado. United States Geological Pro-fessional Paper, 451.
MAKASKE B., 2001 — Anastomosing rivers: a review of their classification, origin and sedimentary products. Earth-Science Reviews, 53: 149–196.
McINERNEY D.P., 1993 — Fluvial architecture and contrasting fluvial styles of the lower New Haven Arkose and Mid-upper Portland Formation, early Mesozoic Hartford basin, central Connecticut. MS thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
106 Kenneth G. Galli
MIALL A.D., 1985 — Architectural-element analysis: a new meth-od of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth Science Reviews, 22: 261–308.
MIALL A.D., 1988 — Facies architecture in clastic sedimentary basins. In: Frontiers in sedimentary geology, new perspectives of basin analysis (eds K.L. Kleinspehn, C. Paola): 67–81. Sprin ger-Verlag, New York.
MIALL A.D., 1996 — The geology of fluvial deposits; sedimentary facies, basin analysis and petroleum geology. Springer, Berlin.
MIALL A.D., 2000 — Principles of sedimentary basin analysis. Springer, Berlin.
NANSON G.C., KNIGHTON D.A., 1996 — Anabranching rivers: their cause, character and classification. Earth-Surface Pro-cesses and Landforms, 21: 217–239.
NEWELL D.L., 1997 — Geology of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation, Fruita Paleontological Resource Area, Colorado [MS thesis]. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
OSBORN H.F., 1904 — Fossil wonders of the past – the dinosaurs of Bone Cabin quarry. Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine, 68: 680–694.
O’SULLIVAN R.B., 1980 — Stratigraphic sections of Middle Ju-rassic San Rafael Group from Wilson Arch to Bluff in south-eastern Utah. United States Geological Survey, Oil and Gas Investigation Chart 102.
PETERSON F., 1994 — Sand dunes, sabkhas, streams, and shallow seas: Jurassic paleogeography in the southern part of the West-ern Interior Basin. In: Mesozoic systems of the Rocky Moun-tain Region, U.S.A. (eds M.V. Caputo et al.): 233–272. Rocky
Mountain Section, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Denver, Colorado.
PIPIRINGOS G.N., O’SULLIVAN R.B., 1978 — Principal uncon-formities in Triassic and Jurassic rocks, Western Interior United States – a preliminary survey. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1035-A, A1-A29.
PLATT N.H., KELLER B., 1992 — Distal alluvial deposits in a foreland basin setting – the Lower Freshwater Molasse (Low-er Miocene), Switzerland: sedimentology, architecture, and pa-leosols. Sedimentology, 39: 545–565.
RICHMOND D.R., MORRIS T.H., 1998 — Stratigraphy and cata-clysmic deposition of the Dry Mesa Dinosaur Quarry, Mesa County, Colorado. Modern Geology, 22: 121–144.
SCHUDACK M.E., TURNER C.E., PETERSON F., 1998 — Bio-stratigraphy, paleoecology and biogeography of charophytes and ostracods from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Western Interior, USA. Modern Geology, 22: 379–414.
SLAUGHTER M., EARLEY J.W., 1965 — Mineralogy and geo-logical significance of the Mowry bentonites, Wyoming. Geo-logical Society of America Special Paper, 83.
SMITH D.G., SMITH N.D., 1980 — Sedimentation in anastomo-sing river systems: examples from alluvial valleys near Banff, Alberta. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 50: 157–164.
SRODON J., EBERL D., 1984 — Illite. In: Micas (Ed. S.W. Bai-ley). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 13: 495–544.
TURNER C.E., PETERSON F., 2004 — Reconstruction of the Up-per Jurassic Morrison Formation extinct ecosystem – a synthe-sis. Sedimentary Geology, 167: 309–355.