fm_lect1

Upload: sonalisa-ray

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    1/35

    ME293: Fracture Mechanics &

    Applications

    Course Instructor: R.Narasimhan

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    2/35

    Course Contents

    Introduction & Overview

    Design against failure

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Evolution of Fracture Mechanics

    Chap. 1: Energy Concepts in Fracture Mechanics

    Atomistic view of fracture

    Griffith energy balance & Irwin-Orowan extension

    Energy release rate G; Compliance method

    Crack growth stability and Resistance (R) curve

    Chap. 2: Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics

    Field equations of elasticity

    Stress / displacement fields near crack tip Williams eigenfunction expansion. Stress intensity factor (SIF) K and relation to applied load, fracture geometry

    Relation between G and K

    Fracture characterization by K Small scale yielding conditions

    Irwins plastic zone correction; Dugdale model.

    Fracture toughness Kc

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    3/35

    Course Contents (continued )

    Chap. 3: Analytical methods for determining SIF

    Westergaard method

    Principle of superposition Greens function method

    Weight function method

    Chap. 4: Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics J Integral

    Plastic crack tip (HRR) fields

    Ductile fracture criterion

    J Integral Testing

    J-controlled crack growth and stability

    Engineering approach to Plastic Fracture

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    4/35

    Course Contents (continued )

    Chap.5 : Fatigue Failure

    S-N Diagram and its limitations

    Fatigue crack propagation Similitude concept; Empirical laws

    Crack closure ; Fatigue Threshold

    Variable amplitude loading ; Overload cycle

    Damage Tolerant Design Methodology

    Chap.6: Fracture of interfaces and thin films

    Stresses and Failure modes in films.

    Interface crack tip fields.

    Crack kinking and crack deflection at interfaces

    Crack channeling in thin films.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    5/35

    References

    1. T.L.Anderson, Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals &Applications, CRC press, 3rd Edn., 2005.

    2. M.F.Kanninen and C.H.Popelar, Advanced Fracture Mechanics,Oxford press, 1985.

    3. D.Broek, Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, MartinusNijhoff publishers, 1982.

    4. Kare Hellan, Introduction to Fracture Mechanics, McGraw Hill,1984.

    5. Fracture Journals : Engineering Fracture Mechanics (Elsevier);International Journal of Fracture (Springer); Fatigue and Fracture ofEngineering Materials and Structures (Blackwell).

    Course Assessment Sessionals Assessment : 2 or 3 class tests / quizzes (50 marks -

    tentative)

    Final exam : (50 marks tentative)

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    6/35

    Introduction & Overview

    Design against failure

    Failure of a structural component may occur in different ways

    Example : Consider thin cantilever beam

    Failure mechanism Failure Criterion

    Yielding Yield

    Strength

    A

    x y = =

    max = c = Max.allowable displacement

    Deflection above

    certain limit

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    7/35

    Design against failure

    Failure Mechanism Failure Criterion

    Fatigue

    N : # cycles to failure

    S : Stress amplitude

    e : Endurance limit

    Fracture

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    8/35

    Fracture based design

    Governing structural mechanics parameter in presence of crack (linear

    elastic body) is Stress Intensity Factor or SIF K.

    For cracked cantilever (small a/h) SIF can be approximatedas :

    Crack propagation occurs when

    K = KIc (Material property called

    Fracture Toughness can be determined

    from lab test)

    max

    max 2

    1.12

    6

    K a

    PL

    where Bh

    =

    max : Maximum stress at crack location that would occur in absence of crack.More accurate estimate should include a factor f(a/h) in above equation.

    (Units : MPam or N m-3/2)

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    9/35

    Strength based vs Fracture based Design

    For example of cracked

    cantilever beam, maximum load

    for given crack length a :

    S Factor of safety

    Traditional Strength of Materials

    approach requires :

    2

    6 (1.12 )

    IcKBhPLS a

    Note eq.(1) is similar ro eq.(2)

    when dN/dt = const and when

    load P is cycled from 0 to max

    value (or K: 0 Kmax)

    (1)

    (2)

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    12/35

    Damage Tolerant Design Methodology (DTDM)

    Initial flaw size ao is determined using

    Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE)

    methods like Ultrasonics or Acoustic

    Emission. Take ao = Min crack size that can be

    detected by NDE method if no crack

    is detected

    In DTDM, one sets NDE-based

    inspection intervals tI for the structuralcomponent from time t estimated forcrack length to increase from ao to ac by

    integrating crack kinetic relations (1) or

    (2).

    Take tI as fraction of t typically : tI = t/3 so

    that there will be minimum of2 or 3 inspections before

    crack becomes critical.

    Adaptively change tbased on crack size found in

    each inspection

    Ref. Kanninen & Popelar

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    13/35

    Application of Fracture Mechanics An Example

    Leak-before-Break in pressure vessel / pipe.

    Consider part-through surface crack

    of length 2c and depth a on the inner

    wall of a pressure vessel or pipe. It is

    subjected to tensile circumferential

    stress.

    Considering the surface to be an

    edge crack subjected to tensile stress

    (K = 1.12 a) one can estimate

    the critical crack depth ac

    Next considering a crack through the

    wall thickness of length 2c subjected to

    tensile stress (K = c ) one can

    estimate critical crack length 2cc.Thickness dependent Kc has to be

    used in calculating cc.

    Flaws A and B are benign while flaw

    C is dangerous. Flaw B leads to leak-

    before-break and can help indetecting the crack.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    14/35

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Man has always had an intuitiveknowledge of FractureMechanics.

    Examples :

    While cutting a tree we make aV-notch on the trunk with an axe(introduce a stress concn.) &

    then pull it down with a rope.

    Brick & mortar are weak undertensile loads. Hence bridges,windows, roof-spans, etc. built in

    ancient times have arch shape causes compressive stressesto be transmitted.

    Ref. Anderson, Fracture Mech.

    Roman Bridge Design

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    15/35

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Leonardo Da Vinci measured strength of wires & found : strength 1/(wirelength) - because longer wire larger sample volume higher probability ofwire having a flaw.

    Due to industrial revolution many kinds of m/cs and structures were made withmetals several failures due to fatigue & fracture in bridges, boilers, ships,

    locomotive wheels & axles, rails, etc., in 19th century.

    Accelerated production of aircrafts & ships during World War II : Led to someserious failures.

    Liberty ships : Cargo ships with all-welded hulls instead of riveted

    construction used in earlier designs ; Sustained fractures (some broke

    completely into two !) in cold waters of N.Atlantic.

    Crack-like flaws present in welds had low KIc (especially at low temperatures)leading to catastrophic fracture .

    Propagating cracks did not encounter any barriers in all-welded ships & were able

    to traverse entire hull.

    In riveted ships, cracks could not propagate across panels joined by rivets.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    16/35

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Comet Jet aircraft : Many

    accidents in early 1950s in

    Comet Jet aircrafts due to rapid

    propagation of cracks initiated

    due fatigue loading near anopening in fuselage.

    Jetliner flying at high altitude is

    like pressurized thin-walled

    vessel (inside pressurized;

    outside low atm pressure) with

    fuselage under tensile stress.

    Failure in Nuclear components :Boilers, piping.

    Thermal shock in nuclear

    reactor vessels.

    Degraded nuclear plant piping

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    17/35

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Development of new materials for high-tech applications has led to

    fracture-related problems

    Ceramics : In 80s and 90s ceramics were developed for structural

    applications like in armours, high pressure jet engines, radomes etc.

    High strength, good creep resistance, low thermal conductivity, etc.

    Low KIc ~ 0.1 to 5 MPam compared to 50 to 100 MPam for metals. Considerable research for improving KIc

    Fibre / particulate reinforcements. Sandwich (ceramic-metal) panels.

    Transformation toughening (phase transformation).

    Bulk Metallic glasses : Multi-component systems which solidify in

    amorphous state.

    Attractive mechanical properties (high strength / stiffness)

    Can have low KIc - considerable research is ongoing to improve toughness.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    18/35

    Motivation for studying Fracture Mechanics

    Thin films / coatings - Thin ceramic,

    metal, polymer coatings (thickness

    varying from few nm to microns).

    Applications like cutting tools, dental

    implants, MEMS, optical systems, etc.

    Prone to variety of failures due to

    intrinsic / extrinsic stresses.

    Intense research on failure of thin filmsand interfaces in 90s and 2000s.

    Summary : Study of Fracture

    Mechanics is important to preventfailures in critical engineering

    components and to develop better

    engineering materials.

    Surface crack

    Channeling

    Substrate cracking

    (crack penetration)

    Crack deflection& debonding

    Spalling

    Failure mechanism

    Ref. Hutchinson / Suo: Adv

    in Appl Mech. V.29, 1992

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    19/35

    Evolution of Fracture Mechanics

    In this course we will focus on Applied Mechanics

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    20/35

    Griffith Energy Approach

    Theoretical cohesive strength of materials (peak stress required to

    break atomic bonds) is very high: c ~ E/6 to E/3 much higherthan observed fracture strengths.

    Griffith performed tensile tests with glass fibres of different thickness

    & observed failure stress f with thickness :

    Note:

    f fbulk-glass for large thickness

    c for very thin fibres( Glass / graphite are usefulas reinforcements in

    polymer-matrix composites).

    Griffith postulated above behavior was caused by presence of cracks whose

    size with fibre thickness.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    21/35

    Griffith Energy Approach

    Griffith postulated :Rate of decrease of = Energy required

    PE wrt crack extension to create new surfaces

    Griffith considered an infinite body containing a crack of length 2asubjected to remote tensile stress

    Using elasticity solution by Inglis for a

    narrow elliptical void in an infinite plate

    subjected to remote stress , Griffithdetermined the potential energy (PE) of

    cracked body as:

    2 2

    oa B

    E =

    2 sA

    =

    (plane stress)

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    22/35

    Griffith Energy Approach

    Problems with Griffith theory :

    Applies to crack of length 2a in infinite body.

    Plastic yielding will occur near crack tip (due to large stresses).

    Inglis solution may not apply.

    Additional energy expended in plastic dissipation as crack grows.

    Theory cannot be directly used in engineering applications because G is

    not convenient parameter to compute for practical configurations.

    G - Energy Release Rate

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    23/35

    Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM)

    George Irwin extended Griffith hypothesis & made it a sound

    engineering discipline.

    He replaced (2s) by (2s + p) where : p is additional plastic workdissipated during creation of unit crack area A.

    For structural metals Irwin & Orowan estimated p >> 2s(Griffith Irwin Orowan Theory of Fracture)

    Using analysis of crack tip fields by Williams (based on an eigenfunction

    approach) and Westergaard (based on complex variable method), Irwin

    identified a new fracture characterizing parameter called Stress Intensity

    Factor or SIF K.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    24/35

    Modes of Fracture

    Y

    Y

    Y

    Z

    ZZ

    Mode I : Tensile or

    Opening Mode

    Crack faces opensymmetrically wrt X-Y &

    X-Z planes

    Mode II : In-plane

    Sliding Mode

    Crack faces slide

    symmetrically wrt X-Yplane &

    anti-symmetrically wrt

    X-Z plane

    Mode III : Out-of-plane

    Sliding Mode

    Crack faces slide anti-

    symmetrically wrt both X-Yand X-Z planes.

    Arbitrarily oriented & loaded crack : Superpose response in the three modes.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    25/35

    Linear Elastic Crack Tip Fields

    Linear elastic analysis shows that the stress / displacement fields near the tip

    for all three modes is of following form.

    K : KI / KII / KIII : SIF

    for modes I, II , III . f(), g(,) : Universalfunctions : depend only

    on modes I, II, III &

    plane strain / plane

    stress.

    Note :

    Stresses / strains are singular as 1/r as crack tip is approached ( r 0 ).

    SIF KI / KII / KIII uniquely characterizes near-tip field (at given (r, ) from tip)irrespective of fracture geometry Concept of similitude.

    SIF depends on applied load, crack length and other geometricalparameters.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    26/35

    Importance of SIF K

    If similitude applies, crack propagation can be postulated to occur

    when :

    K (,a) = Kc

    KI = (a) for Griffith problem (crack of length 2a in infinite platesubjected to remote tensile stress ).

    Irwin showed SIF K is related to energy release rate by :

    G = KI

    2 / E for Mode I

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    27/35

    Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics

    LEFM predicts infinite stresses at crack tip Yielding will occur near cracktip. Rice proposed concept of Small Scale Yielding (or SSY) to extend

    application of LEFM theory (SIF-based) to ductile materials which show

    yielding at crack tip.

    Need alternate parameters to characterize fracture initiation.

    J Integral (extension of Griffith energy release to nonlinear elastic solids).

    Crack tip opening displacement (CTOD).

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    28/35

    Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics

    J-integral plays dual role during monotonic loading of a stationary

    crack in a plastic solid :

    Energy release rate.

    Characterizing (amplitude) parameter of crack tip fields.

    Crack tip stress / strain / displacement fields are described by the

    Hutchinson / Rice / Rosengren (HRR) solution for plastic solids

    obeying a power-law relation ( ~ n) Stresses behave as ~ r -1/(n+1) ; Strains behave as ~ r -n/(n+1) as r 0

    Experimental methods needed to determine ductile fracture

    toughness Jc

    - Multiple Specimen Testing; Single Specimen Testing; ASTM standardtest procedure

    Handbook style approach (EPRI method) to estimate J for standard

    lab specimens & some structural configurations

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    29/35

    Dynamic Fracture Mechanics

    Inertial effects important in fractureanalysis.

    Stationary cracks subjected to dynamicloading

    SIF K(t) higher than static case due tostress wave reflection & interaction effects.

    Fracture criterion :

    Dependence of Kdc

    on influenced bylocal failure mechanism :

    CCP subjected to tensile pulse

    Normalized SIF vs normalized time

    )K(K)t(K dcI =

    K

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    30/35

    Dynamic Fracture Mechanics

    Rapidly propagating cracks

    Stress distribution near crack tip depends on

    crack speed v

    Energy release rate G and K are related by

    similar expressions as stationary cracks :

    Generally KI0 as vcR & so also does G.

    Crack propagation criterion :

    ( ) ( , ) 02I

    ij ijK t v as r r

    =

    2I1

    2

    K)v(fE

    1G

    =

    ( ) ( )I pc

    K t K v=

    Crack Arrest Toughness

    Kpc vs crack speed for AISI

    4340 steel

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    31/35

    Brittle Fracture Mechanism in metals

    Transgranular cleavage

    Crack grows by cleavage of weak

    crystallographic planes with littleplastic deformation (generally in

    BCC & HCP metals due to limited

    number of slip systems for plastic

    flow).

    Especially important in steels at low

    temperature.

    Cleavage cracks are initiated due tofracture of small grain boundary

    carbides or inclusions within grains.

    Ref. Anderson, Fracture Mech.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    32/35

    Cleavage Fracture Mechanism in steels

    Cleavage of individual grains in apolycrystalline alloy gives a facetedappearance.

    Change in crack plane at grain boundaries leads to river pattern-like features withineach facet.

    By following river-patterns one can locate

    the cleavage-triggering particle.

    Cleavage fracture is statistical in natureand depends on probability of sampling avolume containing a cleavage-triggeringparticle leads to scatter in fracture

    toughness data.

    Mechanism is stress-controlled andcharacterized by low fracture energy.

    Ref. Anderson, Fracture Mech.

    Origin of river-patterns

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    33/35

    Ductile or Fibrous Fracture Mechanism

    Has 3 distinct stages :

    Void nucleation (due to fracture ordebonding at inclusions / impurities)

    Void growth (influenced by plastic

    deformation of matrix and by highhydrostatic stress).

    Coalescence of growing voids

    Direct impingement (due to necking

    of ligaments connecting grownvoids).

    Due to void sheeting coalescenceof small voids in ligaments bridgingtwo large voids.

    Crack growth is generally stable andshows high fracture energy.

    Steels show brittle-ductile transition astemperature increases above NDT.

    Ref. Anderson, Fracture Mech.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    34/35

    Inter-granular crack growth

    Under following conditions cracks can

    form & propagate along grain

    boundaries :

    Precipitation of a brittle phase (due to

    improper tempering) at grain

    boundaries.

    Hydrogen & liquid metal embrittlement.

    Environmental assisted cracking &

    intergranular corrosion.

    Grain boundary cavitation & cracking

    at high temperatures

    Ref. Anderson, Fracture Mech.

  • 8/11/2019 fm_lect1

    35/35

    Current Fracture Mechanics Research An Example

    Bulk Metallic Glasses (BMGs) are new materials being developed exhibitinhomogeneous plastic deformation by shear banding; Fracture occurs due to

    cracking inside shear bands in ductile BMGs & by cavitation in brittle BMGs

    Finite element modeling of shear

    banding near notch tip Tandaiya

    et.al., J.Mech.Phys.Solids, 2009

    MD simulation of crack growth by cavitation

    in a brittle BMG Falk , PRB, 1999