following patients with acute abdominal pain in emergency departments

1
POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access Following patients with acute abdominal pain in emergency departments Helen Schultz * , Birthe D Pedersen, Niels Qvist, Christian Backer Mogensen From 4th Danish Emergency Medicine Conference Roskilde, Denmark. 25-26 November 2011 Background The Danish health care system is reorganizing care and treatment of acute patients in the hospitals by replacing the emergency departments and departments that receive acute patients with emergency departments with observation units. The objective is to study the professional efforts and experiences of patients with acute abdominal pain in an acute visitation unit for abdominal surgery (AVUAS) versus an emergency department with an observation unit (ED). Methods Research of the acute process is supported by field observations with focus on content, duration and time concerning patient contact with professionals. Twenty patients are included. The same twenty patients experi- ence are studied by two interviews. First interview takes place at discharge, where the focus is the patient s experience of the acute process. The second interview takes place three months after discharge, with focus on the time after the discharge. The professional effort of the acute patients is researched by 160 medical records, where care and treat- ment, length of stay and re-admissions are registered. Results The analysis of data from the field study and the inter- views are still in progress, and the analysis of medical records has not started yet. Preliminary finding shows that the intervening period to a specialist in ED was 136 minutes (95% CI: 64-208 minutes) and at AVUAS 118 minutes (95% CI: 73-163 minutes) - A non-significant difference. In ED the patients were seen by a physician before seen by a spe- cialist. Nurses spent about 32 minutes with patients at admission in ED and about 15 minutes in AVUAS - A non-significant difference. In ED patient experience is prompt examination, but they need to repeat themselves In AVUAS patient experience is much waiting time. Conclusion Preliminary conclusions indicate that at admission the patients in ED have to wait less time to be seen by a physician, they have to wait longer time to be seen by a specialist and they spent more time with the nurses. At admission, patients in ED experience prompt and a bit overwhelming examination. In AVUAS patients experi- ence a long waiting time. Published: 16 April 2012 doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-S2-P23 Cite this article as: Schultz et al.: Following patients with acute abdominal pain in emergency departments. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2012 20(Suppl 2):P23. * Correspondence: [email protected] Enheden for Sygeplejeforskning, Klinisk Institut, Syddansk Universitet, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense C, Denmark Schultz et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2012, 20(Suppl 2):P23 © 2012 Schultz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Upload: helen-schultz

Post on 30-Sep-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access

Following patients with acute abdominal pain inemergency departmentsHelen Schultz*, Birthe D Pedersen, Niels Qvist, Christian Backer Mogensen

From 4th Danish Emergency Medicine ConferenceRoskilde, Denmark. 25-26 November 2011

BackgroundThe Danish health care system is reorganizing care andtreatment of acute patients in the hospitals by replacingthe emergency departments and departments thatreceive acute patients with emergency departments withobservation units.The objective is to study the professional efforts and

experiences of patients with acute abdominal pain in anacute visitation unit for abdominal surgery (AVUAS)versus an emergency department with an observationunit (ED).

MethodsResearch of the acute process is supported by fieldobservations with focus on content, duration and timeconcerning patient contact with professionals. Twentypatients are included. The same twenty patient’s experi-ence are studied by two interviews. First interview takesplace at discharge, where the focus is the patient’sexperience of the acute process. The second interviewtakes place three months after discharge, with focus onthe time after the discharge.The professional effort of the acute patients is

researched by 160 medical records, where care and treat-ment, length of stay and re-admissions are registered.

ResultsThe analysis of data from the field study and the inter-views are still in progress, and the analysis of medicalrecords has not started yet.Preliminary finding shows that the intervening period

to a specialist in ED was 136 minutes (95% CI: 64-208minutes) and at AVUAS 118 minutes (95% CI: 73-163minutes) - A non-significant difference. In ED the

patients were seen by a physician before seen by a spe-cialist. Nurses spent about 32 minutes with patients atadmission in ED and about 15 minutes in AVUAS - Anon-significant difference.In ED patient experience is prompt examination, but

they need to repeat themselves – In AVUAS patientexperience is much waiting time.

ConclusionPreliminary conclusions indicate that at admission thepatients in ED have to wait less time to be seen by aphysician, they have to wait longer time to be seen by aspecialist and they spent more time with the nurses. Atadmission, patients in ED experience prompt and a bitoverwhelming examination. In AVUAS patients experi-ence a long waiting time.

Published: 16 April 2012

doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-S2-P23Cite this article as: Schultz et al.: Following patients with acuteabdominal pain in emergency departments. Scandinavian Journal ofTrauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2012 20(Suppl 2):P23.

* Correspondence: [email protected] for Sygeplejeforskning, Klinisk Institut, Syddansk Universitet,Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense C, Denmark

Schultz et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine2012, 20(Suppl 2):P23

© 2012 Schultz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited.