following this cover page are scanned images of no ... supreme court of the state of new york county...
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To:
EFREN CARBONELL, Individually and asSpecial Administrator to the Estate of PUBLIOCARBONELL SOTO, Deceased,
-x
-x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No.: 190452-10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
(hereinafter “ Abex” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Abex, with
prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: n /' ftUisIsJ h3.2015
YorkY
Atto iffOX LLPB U(
4th Floor546NY10036New
(212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED,
. Safgente, Esq.HAWKINsllPARNELL THACKSTON
& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interests^to Abex Corporation * v*600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloprV rflyiNew York, New York 10022-V78* V ^(212) 897-9655 ' ^
^ -ffon. Peter H. Moulton
eieiiivEDMAR 2 9 2017
11047615V.1PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
WILLIAM V. KELLER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.190033/09
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
F I L E Dthe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,?-/? , 2017
ilTZ & LUXENBERGTT.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
MES EDWARDSMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS
Attorneys for DefendantTISIIMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION
rrlNC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,T Hon. Peter H. Moulton
ElECEffVEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART SONYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
JOSEPH DAVIS
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.190022/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York.?-/? 2017
(Juries .WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
n, P.C.
5WARDSAHMJTY^DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant
JM£N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED, /is#./ Hon. Peter H. Moulton IRECiWED
MAR 2 9 2017j! PART 50I SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
THOMAS DOUGHERTY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.190066/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3-!3 2017
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
Charles JemfeonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERKIBS-AWARDS"
AHMUTO, DEMERS & McMANUSAttofcqeys'for Defendant
N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,
7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton IREOEWEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
HERMAN BRESSEL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.190112/10190046/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
3~13 2017APR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
WAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
JAMES EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,
^ ^ Hon. Peter H. MoultonMAR 2 9 2017
MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
GtfloitfteSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xJOHN M. ANTICO and PATRICIA M. ANTICO, Index No.: 190032/08
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al ,
Defendants.x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. /
RTRRO, ESQ/ /U M R Y I C, . S H AThe Early Law Firm *Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
A. FLUITT, ESQ.Barry, McTieman & Moore, LLCAttorneys for: Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006Tel.: (212) 313-3600
_Our File No.: CLEKJSL E D
APR 05 2M7NEW YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
RECEIVEDMAR 3 o
-^COURT - CIVIL
X:/KMA/S426S/dkml!t*als/M*lm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiffs),
•against Index No.: 190150/10
AFTON PUMPS, INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendants.•X
WHEREFORE,defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, jORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants JOHN CRANE INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Locks Law Firm747 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017
NJarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th Floor 1
New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED
*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To:
MICHELE ALFANO, as Executrix of the Estate ofANTOINETTE A. KISZKIEL a/k/a ANNKISZKIEL, deceased,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Plaintiffs),Index No. 190025/2012
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTORJCOMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: Ne?aYora, New York
By: JordWFoK, Bsq. jBELLU(|K &WOX , LLP546 5th Avenue4th FloorNew York, New York 10036Counsel for Edward Simicich
By: Adam Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FDEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for Defendant
fisLL.E OAPR 05 2017
Ford Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:S' HON. PETER H. MOULTON
HON. PETER H. MOULTON
IIAD - ianco awaadns SANos iavd
L\U zz avwOlAfllOiy{01782788.DOCX }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190083/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,
as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, NewTfork
J & . 2017
Jordan Fox, Esg// 'Joseph Belluck,®®q.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
M i M o jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED, <2-Hon. Peter H. Moulton
lF?E©E[IVE©MAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190083/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’ ) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y< , New XibrkMqiTfolC. . 2017
Jordan Fox, ifsqiJoseph Belluok^Es^.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
SO ORDERED,/
on/Teter H. Moulton
i Mjjjkj jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
E .(SHOWEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190083/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.1
Dated: New Yofx/ New Yjprk
lf teW;/ 2017
Jordan Fox, EfsqJoseph Belluok?*]Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
SO ORDERED,
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DAPR 05 20\7
^smsssrRESEOYEO
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190083/2011
DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
r >rk
_, 2017
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
BUh j
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTAPR 05 20tf
SO ORDERED,
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,
Plaintiffs),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190319/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NewYo: Ne York
6 , 2017
Jordan Fox, E£Joseph Belluck, !Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
Beth L. Hughes, £sq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,4Jon^reter H. Moulton
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
F&i©E0WEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190083/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to
Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Jfjbrl^ Nejw York
vM IG , 2017
Jordan Foxi EM.Joseph BellWj/,[E£q.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
S/M jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNT;' CLERK
F8EOE1WEDMAR 2 2 2117
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,
Plaintiffs),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190319/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: YorkNe N Yorkw>lb , 2017
sq.Jordan Fox lJoseph Bell'Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
/to i Mfjld)Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
SO ORDERED,IJpn. p^ter H. Moulton
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
F I L E DCTO 5 20)7
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNT/ CLERK
IREOEUWiDMAR 02 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,
Plaintiffs),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190319/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International
(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New ork
Vx,
New York
>\ . If ) . 2017
Jordan FpJoseph Beh&ck,'Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
, y/SO ORDERED, /
fyjlh l kujjbuBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
/Horn Peter H. Moulton
F I L E Dtn t iTSf
NE'WVOfK. COUNTYQOUN >
PEWEGEwWK ***'1
NYSSU
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
*
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
/
Index No: 190319/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to
Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: YorW New York
, 2017
N
Jordan ]
Joseph teell*tJ{,ftisq.Belluck^/Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
8l&lBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,H6n. Peter H.'Moultontt
APR OS 2017NEW YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK[RECEDED
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190319/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,
as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y« k York
Ifc , 2017
e
Jordan Fox/EpJoseph BeMuck' Es'q.Belluck <SrFox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
iM/ jjjUlJBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
SO ORDERED,/Jlon. Pete/H. Moulton
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
ffiECEBWEDMAR 22 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190005/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New/ rk, Yorke
, 2017
Eid.Jordan Fox, EscJoseph BaLlucJizy ]
Belluck <SLFOX LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
tfR 05 RECEIVEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NVS SUPREME: COURT - CIVIC
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190005/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International
(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New YjDfk, Np^Yor^SikjUvjfiu
Beth L. Hughes, Eisq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
Mmh/k, , 2017
Jordan Fox, EfJoseph Belluclf wBelluck & FoxXLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
Sieiw®m^ 1017
NYS SUPKt
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190005/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New Y< York
5 fe 2017
Jordan Fox, ]
Joseph Belmck^Esq.Belluck & IMx LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
M1l MjDthuT Himlipc Pt<~iBeth L. Hughes, Esq.
Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,H(m. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
IMECEOVE©MAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190005/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to
Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without jcpsts.
Dated: Ne1 ^ork,v)New YorkN I t , 2017
Jordan FoLiffiq?Joseph Belluck, Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTSCOUNTY CLERK
F8EOEOVIDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,
Plaintiffs),vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190005/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: foikJ New York
, 2017
Jordan Fok, ]
Joseph Beikftk^Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,Hq^Peter H. Moulton F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
'ScMiwMW ]MAR 2 2 2017 j
^<4• CfVIL j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 190174/09PAUL MILLER and LOUISE MILLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named
as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC”) hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
5 <S . 2017
--David J. Baity, Esq^^feS fcmA&AWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ^700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED, XT? -*-
^on Peter H. Moulton |J|^APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTY
COLT .TV CLERK
iiOIWEDMAR 23 2017
- c.nNYS • H’VU.
2558486
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 190355/2010MARC ROSE and MARILYN ROSE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named
as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2017
XL
Matthew T. MacIntyre; Esq^/q#Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. F&T%U3DP-700 Broadway, 6th Floor 0New York, NY 10003
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,£ Hon. P<on. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D
APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
BltOiWiSMAR 2 3 2017
P' 50HYS So'1-; - ,
• CWIL
3265322
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190055/11
ELIEZER BARASCH, as Administrator of theEstate of STANLEY S. BARASCH, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical,
Inc. and Cutler-Hammer, Inc. (improperly pled as Eaton Electrical (Individually and as successor-in-
interest to Cutler Hammer) (“ Eaton” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
Eaton with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Eaton are and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical, Inc. and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, NY 10281
The Lanier Law Firm, PLLC126 East 56th Street, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED,/ HotfTPeter H. Moulton IIAID - iynco 3waadns SAN
05 ±yvd
3284967
YORK COUNTV Z i O Z g S N V WCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CHARLES P. BLAND
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190007/2012
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
3/0 - 2017
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judhti A/Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANT# YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, lfc* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
^/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E D
IBECEWEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART SOI ms SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190112/10In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
FRANCOISE BRESSEL as Administrate for theEstate of HERMAN H. BRESSEL, andFRANCOISE BRESSEL, Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Plaintiffs),- against - I.A.S.Part 50
Hon. Peter H. MoultonA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 3~g~ /7New York, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Oinvjmx WKr 1 J.
Attorneys for Defendant CO'-"'*Weil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
;_XJOHN M. ANTICO and PATRICIA M. ANTICO,
Plaintiffs,Index No.: 190032/08
- against -
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,Defendants.
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summaiy Judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s
complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF
signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.
Dated: OS I 17 2017New York, New York *
/v\AMark R. Bibro, Esq. ^The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017
J JNjsM/S’. LakhaniJfes'tiSegal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED, ^Hon. Peter H. MoultonF I L E D
APR 0 5 2017rc ‘:w YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
P5ECEWE©MAR 2 2 2017
| PART 50I uvq SUPREME COURT - Civil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50Moulton, P.
This Document Relates to:Index No. 190491/2011
PAUL J. DELUCA and VIOLA DELUCA,
-against-Plaintiffs.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER AS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al, i
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated * New York New York
Charles Ferguson, Esq.A xu niAttorney for Defendant
Peerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300
New York, NY 10003212.558.5500
File No. 1863.28172 F I L T
4845-4966-9699.1
SO ORDEREDffon. Peter II. Moulton APR 0 5
NEW YORK C(COUNTY CL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALBERTA TONUCCI, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of RAYMONDTONUCCI, and ALBERTA TONUCCI,Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
%
Index No.: 105449/99
-/A*'ee
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC fk/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named
as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorky -% . 2017
/ 1/1/ L
Charles Ferguson,Tisq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew F. ain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,Mon. Peter H. Moulton
REClWp jMAR % 3 2017: ; "• ; -
PAST 50N Y S S U P R ^ : ' • - ‘ r I V1L
3262203
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILLIAM JORDAN
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
A% % $0
Index No.: 113156/1998
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named
as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC”) hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
3~ K , 2017
Dana M. Norihcraft,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. p Zf&JSDn700 Broadway, 6th Floor (JNew York, NY 10003
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,'Hon. Peter H. Moulton
r ' v;3262253
REG#.#1
MAR 2 3 2017
NYS SUPREME CCUPT rTyu-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)— x
This Document Relates To: Index No.: 111957-04 -cJAMES G. KUTKUHN and BARBARA L.KUTKUHN, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT %MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
incorrectly sued herein as “ PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION,” (hereinafter “ Abex”), hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Abex, with prejudice, there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
ed with prejudice and without costs.1016
& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC,Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7878(212) 897-9655
New York, NY10036(212) 681-1575
Hdn. Peter H. Moulton
11047615V.1 MAR 2 9 2017PART SO
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j Index No,: 115842/0
NYCALI,A,S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
JOHN MCCLOSKEYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Attorney forPlaintiffJohn McCloskeyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Tishman Liquidating Corp.McGrvNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERE
2383-27339
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
APR -sc° Tyr , ° 1111
X
DAVID J. RENZ, as Executor for the Estate of HERBERT RENZ, Index No. 109573-2002and MAUREEN RENZ, Individually,
Plaintiffs,-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT
A.C. and S. INC. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant ROPER PUMP COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against ROPER PUMP COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantROPER PUMP COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York
7
arles Fereuson. Esa.Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
/
StepheVNevSlddis/Tisq.Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneysfor Defendant Roper Pump Company150 Broadway,Suite 600New York, NY 10038
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dated:
KE©E1VE0MAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YflfJK 5 7(j|-|COUNTY OF NEW YORK
^EC!® EIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONN
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD HENN and VIRGINIA HENN,
Plaintiffs,vs.A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.
[RECEIVEDMAR 22 20W
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 104802/2008
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., n/k/a Goulds Pumps LLC hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc,, n/k/a Goulds Pumps
LLC, only, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., n/k/a Goulds Pumps LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
Joseph Belmck, Esq.Jordan Fpx, Esq.Belluck & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
^Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SO ORDERED,,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
THOMAS J. MURRAYAND
PATRICIA MURRAY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 119472/01, 111220/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York,NAv York
3 Iftrll . 2017
Aaam S. Dreksler, Esqiam S. Dreksler, Esq,
Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas J. Murray and Patricia MurrayWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
/,
czJasjm A. Null, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks Company agMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 30
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004^(212) 509-3456 o s
s
cn
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
504-1111
RECt ;DMAR 22 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 109036/00, 122188/99
ESTATE OF WALLACE G. NUSBAUM /NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed wilg prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Wallace G. NusbaumWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,^ non. reier n. iviouuon
504-1519
Q3-A\4
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 109036/00, 122188/99
ESTATE OF WALLACE G. NUSBAUMNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Adam S, Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Wallace G. NusbaumWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
2383-26065AA
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SHERRY ANN COONS, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANTHONY T. PALLONE
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)Index No.: 105600/03, 126937/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againsto
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkMarCY } fa . 2017
hereby dismissed witlSprejudice
§? ^ r~£ - rn
$ o
Justin Weitz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Anthony T. PalloneWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
KeniSnn Mjgfook. ESQ.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,.(y Hon. Peter H. Moulton
1235-9210
ifiSECSEOWEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
f
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS L]ros Lnrfo rfoN-x
This Document Relates to:
JOHN J. CURLEY
4P/KmwY s-tm- X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.120398/01104830/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againsto
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REAlSY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3-/3 2017
& —ChflrliZS' fertuSDflWEITZ & LUXENBERG' P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Mmo 3O r*m
cn mGO S3pc oo-n2}om
MES EDWAHMUTY,\DEMERS & McMANUS
\ Attorneys for DefendantX. TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION^ Q., INQ. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED, si*^fion. Peter H. Moulton IBEOEWE©MAR 2 9 2017
PART 50\ is!VS SUPREME COURT - CIVI
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOX
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH L. MINERVINO
-m-^-5-wf -X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.122185/99109247/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York o3- /3 2017— -
Charles Rs4>s&nWEITZ & LUXENRERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTYHOLDINGS,
INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
a_< -nss ? r-
IRDSAHMJTYvJ)EMERS & M2j&CANIg|Attorneys for Defendant ^ ^IRISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION
O
SO ORDERED
^ Hon. Feter H. Moulton BECEWEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50I NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBEST(^l|[|lG^]^K ^This Document Relates to:
ARNOLD YARCZOWER
APR -5 X
“uncEVE?«Wf,c£
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.122138/01102724/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2.02 , 201702 .
Qharj/X' F&mtfonIITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.WEI1
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
oo% -n
7 r-cx> cn
O — j
moBDWARDS
AHMUTY, pEMERS & McMAlftjSAttorneys for Defendant
*>N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton REOEOWED
MAR 2 9 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
T
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LT
\
This Document Relates to:
RAFAEL HERNANDEZ
-WUS-lBkC0UNTWSK0FF'Ct
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.109536/00121990/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X SEPTEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2017
Charles Jtf&LWrEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.W
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
LARB5»
oo§— *
'n2».5P 5n-j3^3o tn
U1o o1UTY,NDEMERS & McM^NUSAttorHeys forDefendant oTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,U Hon. Peter H. Moulton
[RECEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ^
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH A. GABRJELLI
cou%wmcf
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.104669/00125779/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO, , INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York?- /? 2017
AhaHes FMAWIWE1TZ & LUXENBIJJKG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED, — —Hon. Peter H. Moulton
oocz2=
SgC2Q V
JAMESAHMU
3DW^RE>S f~/, DEMERS & MdVtgSbscn
tjorneys mr Defendant ^TISflMAlOlEALTY & CONSTRUCTION WCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY§OLDINGS,INC. m199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
RECEIVED! MAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NyS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.110331/03
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X JUNE 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3'13 2017
CmridS ferbu&nWEITZ & LUXENBERC, RC.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
4 «,
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
JAMES-EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant
1MAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO.riNr: n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
ilolwii'MAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)X
This Document Relates to:
RAYMOND TONUCCIIndex No.105449/99
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERJUNE 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorki i UIA, nvw ivi f t
3-13 2017
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
MAR 2 9 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
KENNETH W. MAXWELL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.107598/00122189/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X JUNE 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York'3' ( 3 . 2017rx~
Charles fa&usonWEITZ & LUXENBERO, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
f \ \-£°SO ORDERED,
HonHon. Peter H. Moulton
JAMES EDfWARDSAHMVrY,\DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION
1n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
DECEIVEDMAR 2 9 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
NICHOLAS MANGINELLI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.109020/00121979/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X JUNE 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2017
Charles RmusonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
JAMES EDWARDSf , DEMERS & McMANUS
Attori^ys for'Defendant.TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION
h^JLNCS^/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton «51®1
N0NOUNT*
COUNT*
REGHVEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
WILLIAM L.TRUCKS SR. and MARCIATRUCKS,
Plaintiffs),
-against-A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al,
Defendants.WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon, Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 107340/2001
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.7UDated:
New ’V/orJ^ Neew York
Vila*Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,r/2LHon. Peter H. Moulton
KirstenXlford Kneis, Esq.K&L^ATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
tU-ED HEOEWEOMAR 2 0 2017
PART 50SUPREME COU*T - CIVIL
NYS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ALICE GOLIGHTLY, as Executrix for the Estateof JOHN GOLIGHTLY and ALICE GOLIGHTLY,Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Plaintiffs),Index No.:112029/2008
-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants. — xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
BrettWEFAttor700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Datet
CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED, F I L E DHon. Peter H. Moulton
MAR 2 0 2017PART 50
IMYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
DAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for the :Estate of FREDERICK P. KELLY JR., :
BiOillViOMAR 16 2017
PART 50MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCAL
Index No.: 108282/99
Plaintiffs),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al,Defendants. Hon. Peter H. Moulton,
IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and GoodyearCanada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire Sc Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
3-g-nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:-FrarirOTtfzTEsqT >0Charles Fer&USon
700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire 8cRubber Company and GoMveapCanada Inc.By:
Lawrence G. Leg^fesq.
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400 F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017SO ORDERED: .£ Hon. Peter H, Moulton, J.S.C.
MEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:X
NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
XDAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for the :Estate of FREDRICK P. KELLY JR., :
NYCAL
IHEOEIIViBMAR 16 1017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL
Index Nos.: 108282/99
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C. and S., INC., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
iDefendants. :
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: Rv- ^Frank OrtizrEsq.&haH S Ftttsuscnadwav700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
_F I L E D
APR 0 5 2017
SO ORDERED:C' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for theEstate of FREDRICK P. KELLY JR.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.C. and S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
X: NYCAL
XIndex Nos.: 108282/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
3-x ~nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:FrntiV Orti? F
~^n
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By:Frank-Qrtiz, Esq.Charles Reason700 Broadway J
New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(2
^12|30^4(gj
APR 0 5 2017
SO ORDERED?
NEW YORK COUNTYQQIJNTVXLERK
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
IBEQEIIVEBMAR 16 2017
NySSUPREMERCOURT. CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS, :
Plaintiff(s), :
NYCAL / ^ 1 6 2017 lc /Index Nos.: 113781/02
106690/02
-against- :
A.C. and S., INC., et al., :
Defendants. :
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
c?-£-/7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rv. <^> <5^—Flunk OitizrEsq.
Charles f&qason-700 Broadway uNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New YorkAPR 0 5 2017
C Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. — -
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By:Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
P I L E D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,
X
X
PlaintifF(s),
NYCAL I'^^ESl
Index NosOP,,
: 113781702106690/02
-against-A.C. and S., INC., et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. :
X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:Frank Ortiz, LgqChcoHes
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
P&ju$ori
Bv:Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001
:400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
(2121302.2F I L E DuPROsa®
dSoSSSSa*'Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
IBEOEDVEDMAR 10 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JAMES R. REYNOLDS,
Plaintiffs),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
-X
-X
NYCAL16 2017
' CIVILJIndex Nos.: 113781/02;106690/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire 8c Rubber Company and Goodyear* Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: .T?on iifc 1 ^Virf+r=r,,P"W n ~rFfankrCWtzrSsq.Qharids ferquson
700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Good#ar Canada Inc.By: t jUJU '
6xawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400 F I L E D
Dated: New York, New York APR 0 5 2017
SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of MILTON GOODBAR,
X
X Wit
NYCAL
Index No: 190009/2012
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants. :X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
3 -/7
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
By:Adam Drckslcr, Egqy \
Chadts Festft&n700 Broadway UNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
By:Andrew Mundo, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
r i L E DAP* 05 20I?
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NORMA JEAN PETERSON, as Personal Representative for theEstate of ALDEN L. PETERSON, and NORMA JEANPETERSON, Individually,
X
X
Plaintififfs),
-against- :
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL, :
Defendants.X
DECEIVEDMAR 16 2017
NYCA SUPREPMAERCOURT . CIV1L
Index No: 190437/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York* New York
3-S 77WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:tisa Busch,Esq. *"*
New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
By:Alexander Broche, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----- — X
In Re New York COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
CORDELL J. BELLACH,
Plaintiff,
-against-
c \ v.e0
BP AMERICA INC., et al,Defendant.
X
[RECEIVEDMAR 15 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190267/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTBP AMERICA INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant BP AMERICA INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant BP AMERICA INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
BP AMERICA INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:Feb.^.3 to'iPft—Harrison, NY
Brian Early, Esq.Early. Lucarelli, Sweeney &MeisenkothenAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233
Russell S. Jamison, E^MARIN GOODMAN/LLP.Attorneys for DefendantBP AMERICA INC.,500 Mamaroneck Ave., Suite 501Harrison, NY 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
/0.L. —^/Honorable Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ROBERT GRAVES and MARGARET GRAVES,
X
X
Plaintiffs),
/ M A R I S 2017
"YCAb i^aviL IIndex Nos.: 111622/03
113488/03190080/08
-against-
CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC., successor bymerger to CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSEELECTRIC CORPORATION,
Defendants. :X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
7-^/7
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: .Frank Qrtiz
^Esq.Charts tebus&i
700 Broadway JNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York F I L E DAPR 05 2017
SO ORDERED:/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C?
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
JOHN HAUGH, JR. and MAUREEN HAUGH, asCo-Executors of the Estate of JOHN HAUGH, andMARGARET HAUGH, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)., et al,
NYCALLAS. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 120465/2000
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: # yft3*4veiT mffaaw York. Nfcw York *:w York, mw York
wFrank OitieHSsqt Adoim DrcYS ter < EsqWEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.¥JzL GATES LLPAttorneys for Defendam
CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
Hon. Peter H. MoultonAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
ffSEOEWE©MW) 20 2017
PART 50ISIYS SUPREME COUftT - CIVIL [
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To: :
CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for theEstate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for theEstate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon.Peter Moulton)
Plaintiff, Index No.: 109036-00
AC&S, INC.,et al.,-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiff’s complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
rsielwlBSO ORDERED,AM ° 5 20 ff MAR 2 0 2017
NcnSc°WTyCOUNTY CLERKPART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-xThis Document Relates To:
WILLIAM L.TRUCKS SR. and MARCIATRUCKS,
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Plaintiffs),Index No.: 119377/2000-against-
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al,
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Defendants.•x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO.be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED, F I L E Dt Hon, Peter H. Moulton
NEW YORK COUNTY MAR 2 0 2017COUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Tins Document Relates to:
REZZIERO F. DEL GALLO and BARBARADEL GALLO
NYCAL ^ ^I.A.S. Part 50 %(Moulton, P) ^ ^Index No.: 119626-01; 11lS%6 & ^113279-97; 1110^8 ^108752-99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARkV"JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: NewYork, New York
.2017
Charles Ferguson, EsqX^)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
Alidrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
YanisCo rycC^7Y
RE© IDMAR 2 3 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
3266255
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DONALD CIMATO
ANYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 112912/1998 &NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York:s~ff .2017
s2_
Charles Ferguson^ EsqTWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,fton. Peter H. Moulton ^L E D
APR 05 2017(REOiOWED
MAR 23 2017PART 50
N',r ' CIVIL
3262230
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:(Moulton, P.) 'V&fy tyjIndex No. 103881/2003 % °*>/q
RICHARD METZ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lipe Automation Corporation (“ Lipe” ) hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Lipe with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lipe be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 7
^vidj. Bur^afg'
h^rt^JWeitz & Luxenberg, PC JAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
New York, New York
Brian Sorensen, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Lipe AutomationCorporation88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED,
3200826_1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM
%' <* ^NYCAL u*ry "S
I.A.S. Part 50 4^, $/ )
Index No: 109036/0 n F/Cj~NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2017
/Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A.DARGEF
tvitz, Esq.RRANTE LVITZ & BLAU, LLP
Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, l^1 FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
RECEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 109036/00
cO,% * %y0/$0Pp
y
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Gould Electronics Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Gould Electronics Inc., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Gould Electronics Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkMflroh . 2017
v
Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Megan McGovern, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Gould Electronics Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
IRBSEflWEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50HYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY- - - XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION- - XThis Document Relates to:Joseph C. McKendry,
IRECEIIWEDMAR 16 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
I.A.S. ParL 50(J. Moulton)
Index No.:113335/01
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A .o. Smith Water Products Co. f et al.
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.| X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civ _ J.i
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaint iff:s ’
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC, , with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all
claims and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,
be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
1 /ijR- r'a017
ifet.fcJa&aL.J-ar.aa.QjE.iEv, Ester. . Ryan'JJ. BarnesV Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for DefendantJoseph C. McKendry700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED:
Peter H. Moulton
Goulds Pumps, Inc. o44 Wall Street, 15l:h Floq§?New York, New York lOOCE^Our File NO. : 6754 -6
jAIon .
“A Coto
§c--
O
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORJELLO,
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO, et al ,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
</>
Index No.: 119382/00104046/01; 100759/03
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY hereby
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§ 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS
COMPANY with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Wfciti 'lains, New York/7? ,2017
Ljjilra B. Hollmanft£sq.Attorney for DefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Mm $Yi-rh_I^lsanlJarlow, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
{V0369883.1}
1 1
536.17068/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
%
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
AMERICO A. VARI,
Plaintiff,
-against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 110331/03
(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: 3~8 ~/ ~7East Hanover, New Jersey
4ATTHEW frlACINTMATTHEW MitCD4T¥RirE^.WEITZ & LUXENBERG. ^>cAttorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway 0f tNew York, New York 10003 J
STEPHEN F. BA^SAMO,ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
^Horforable Peter H Moulton
I MAR 2 2 2017 I
536.10758/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:
NICHOLAS MANGINELLI, Deceased,Index No.: 109020/00
121979/99
Plaintiff,(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)
against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:East Hanover, New Jersey
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,lorable Peter H. Moulton - RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
MAR 2 2 2017
536.07909/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
THOMAS MAGUIRE, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
-against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 122013/98
(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
C.//
V ^ V/s
* V>
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: 3 S' HEast Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINT-WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
XQCh&rltriesFcrfysrn
STEPHEN f.GARRJTY,& FLINN
ILSAMO, ESQ.HAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED, —e tjprforable Peter H. Moultonv , . -CIVIL-1ST JD ;
i 2 2 2017 jHON. PETER H. MOUIT^" ]ADMINISTRATIVE J
. . .I i i*
%
D T-
APR - 5 7 ~ HSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OB.NEWYORK - ..-COUNTY OF NEW YORK ^YCR;; ^ ~— —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL
ROBERT GRAVES,
Plaintiffs),
i^Eeiswisi/ MAR i g 2017 /
-XIndex Nos.: 111622/03;113488/03; 190080/08
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and GoodyearCanada Inc.hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York_ r/,7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
Ccfa%H S Fertfu&n700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cpfnpany and/Goodyear Canada Inc.
Lawrence Qs^xe, Esq.264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:£ Hon. Peter PL Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW1COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-42*-IN RE: NEW YORK CITY . :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION-* ‘'\pil 'S,0Fri:CE
*(Ue-i— *44--X
r4WROBERT GRAVES and MARGARET GRAVES,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC., successor bymerger to CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSEELECTRIC CORPORATION,
Defendants.
-X
nwlSlBMAR 16 2017
2222?^. CIVIL
NYCA:
Index Nos.: 111622/03113488/03190080/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
- X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorknWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By:
Rubber Company
Rv- rCC eT? ^ -" U D ATVMAITFrank-Grtiz, Esq.
Charles ferftASorirlwav v700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
Kate H. Romick, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
BISIWEOMAR 16 2017
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. 05 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to;
JOANN LIVINGSTON, as Executrix for theEstate of LOUIS R. ADAMS and MARY
LOUISE ADAMS, Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.: 100919/03,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkn , 2016
Attorney for PlaintiffsLouis R. Adams and Mary Louise AdamsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
KetTyjgnrTM^C<3ok. Esq.AttorneyTor"DefendantCourter Sc Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY SC KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,cT Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
IRECEWE©
PART 50MYS SUPREME COURT CIVIL
1122-18640
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOANN LIVINGSTON, as Executrix for theEstate of LOUIS R. ADAMS and MARY
LOUISE ADAMS, Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.: 100919/03,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkPT , 2016
:i tHI Attorney for Plaintiffs
Louis R. Adams and Mary Louise AdamsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
KOT^aafi M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,.^2£ yHon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017
NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
IRSECEBVEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
1235-18099
iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30(Moulton, P.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SHARRON DEYETTE, as Executrix of the Estate of j Index No. 118139/98RAYMOND DEYETTE :
Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER CORP, et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Heather Janis Gaw, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
4838-4535-4304.1
File No. 1863.12967
Hon. Peter H. Moulton N
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
-X
-X
AS FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT MESSIER ANDBARBARA MESSIER AS SPOUSE,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL, INC.,etal.,
Index No.:02-108886
Defendants. — X
WHEREFORE, defendants CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“ Central Hudson” ) and CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. (“ CH Energy” ) hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants Central Hudson and CH Energy be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: //$V /7New York, New York
Brian Early, Esq.EARLY & STRAUSS, L.L.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 986-2233
^Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorney for Defendants335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680
SO ORDERED^X^^Hon. Peter Moulton308947.1
F I L E D05 2017
MEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
i m ** lW \
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xROBERT MESSIER and BARBARA MESSIER, Index No.: 108886/2002
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
-v.- AND ORDER
ABB LUMMUS GLOBALS INC., et aL,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, Ndv York2017
/Wf, /£
THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017Attorneys for PlaintiffsRobert Messier, et al.
SO ORDERE]Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for Defendant (REOEUWE©J.H. France Refractories Compatty 2 2 2017
DATE PART 50TJYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
{00047246.}
ApR 05 201/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROBERT S. ZUKOSKI
Plaintiff(s),vs.
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
^iSEDVIDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 108920/2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC,named in the complaint as “GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED” hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as GouldsPumps LLC without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC be and the same are herebydismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkftfarrh tti . 2oiffyi
BriaiTEarly, Esc^/The Early Law Firm, LLC360 Lexington Avenue20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)
— -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT(S)
SO ORDERED,ziloif'Peter H. Moulton P I L E D
APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
RAYMOND DEYETTEIndex No.118139/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkjWT 2017
Charles RmbsonWEITZ & LUXENBER0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
* 2JAMliS HIMAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS
vAttorn^ys for DefendantTlSH lAJNl REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F f L E DNiW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK
pfgfwfslI MAR 2 9 2017 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.JACK KING 106451/00
121987/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2017
CharlesErfz & LUXE!'w y „wnWETTZ & LUXENBER0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED, 2 - .
JAMES EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANU!Attorneys for Defendant
JSHM^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCOTlNC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
bn. Peter H. Moulton
IBEOEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017
; PART 50VVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
JAMES H. CONROYIndex No.123322/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2017
LM®.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
WARDSJAMES
^£0
AHMUTY7DEMERS & McMANUSUtornWs for Defendant
flSHJ^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
SO ORDERED,r Hon. PeterPeter H. Moulton
pieiiiwio]I MAR 2 9 2017 I.^gSUPREW COURT CIVIL J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK i i Lul l
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
DAVID DOCKERY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.122175/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X FEBRUARY 2016 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York% ( H 2017
0AIK s.
/Suzdnyvt/ WEITZ &/LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney^ for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
7^ on. Peter H. Moulton
EDWARDSAHMIATY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant
HftjIAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(21 E D
APR 0 5 2017COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK ^ ISCMSWMDI
MAR 2 9 2017„ PART soNYS SUPREME COURT - crva
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.ROOSEVELT GREEN 106612/00
121992/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X FEBRUARY 2016 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
lAU ^2017
AJUL AWARDS7K E
j WElfZ &yLUXENBERG, P.C.i Attorneys for Plaintiffs
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
AHMUTY,VDEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant
N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY MOLDINGS,INC h I L e r ^199 Water Street ^ EZ [ jNew York, New York 10038 APft n c
W
(212) 513-7788 ° W?8
. Peter H. MoultonBSSSIB
MAR 2 9 2017PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - crvn
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORIELLO,
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.C. & S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No. 104046/2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne
M^JfipostPatrick Lynott, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITI77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300
Uv//n /iitg, Esqr- PjfXO C. 6/Tfe\J-MS*Attorney for PlaintiffsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
ipLJf yWOydwayFile No. 1863.25996
SO ORDERED
r Jork, New Yj
APR 05 2(j?;;' 5?8'5i,T. V>^ ,
NEW YORK COUNTY ' ^1- CQUNTY CLCr?K-
S> Hon. Peter H. Moultonp^T
U'/S
r"\\
4833-8794-2724.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK‘COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 108886/02,
ROBERT MESSIERAND
BARBARA MESSIER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Pecora Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Pecora Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Pecora Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, Nfew Yorkjyav/ .gin
Erin Miter, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPecora CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara MessierTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
SO ORDERED,' Aion. Pel
MAR 2 9 2017Hon. Peter H. Moulton PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
539-9
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 108886/02
ROBERT MESSIERAND
BARBARA MESSIER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum Industries, Inc., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum
Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: :w York_, 2017
^Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara MessierTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233
Alysa KolomsAttorney for DefendantZum Industries, LLCMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
MAR 2 9 2017SO ORDERED,
?ter H. MoultcPART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
535-343
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
JAMES M. MARTIN,
Plaintiffs),
-against-AO SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,, et al,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 115708-06
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated/1 3/W/^/ NeW York, New York/ / /
j ylfehris RoUanelli, Esq. '
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 585-5500
20176rneys for Defendant /\po n RCRANECO. n
...599 Lexington AvenueNEW YORK nNew York, NY 10022-6<OBu/Vry n?UNTY(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED, /7)
7*on. Peter H. Moulton fil©E[l¥EOMAR 2 8 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
i 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK \r f^ECEW!
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-XThis Document Relates to:
JAMES W. MCCANN
MAX. : ! r
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.111360/99100611/03
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X FEBRUARY 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,?' /3 2017
< MCharles kcrqysdn
WEITZ & LUXENBJZRiG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
E&VA^DSmAHMLTCY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys u)r DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION
> n/k/a TTV MALf YjHOLDINGS,me. Hf h199 Water Street ^pp -New York, New York 10038* U 5 ftp(212) 513-7788 A/£VVy(
/T Hon. Peter H. Moulton BEOEWE©MAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
JAMES N. WALTERS
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.122199/99113158/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X JUNE 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3"/3 2017
23ChtiHeS Ftr$ .
WEITZ & LUXENBE&0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED, /3 '
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
5WARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS
^Attorneys for Defendant
^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 jfcter StreetNe^orf, New York 10038(212) 513-7^8
^^o^Nry \pARl^MDT - CIVIL
NY5 SUP ECOUKT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
HENRY MCKEOWN
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.104245/97, 113280/97111035/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X AUGUST 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkrs -v/3 2017— -
ChfirltZS F&bmOnTWEITZ & LUXENBERU P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,^ZHon. Peter H. Moulton
WARDSAHWTY, ^)EMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant
ISHM,co., mINC.
REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONn/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,
199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788
£4, m-©SOWEDMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to:
JOHN HAUGH
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.120465/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X SEPTEMBER 2015 FIFO
WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV
REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,
TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2017
GhatA s RxwsonWEITZ & LUXENBERG^ P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,C '"’ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
JAMES EE WARDSAHMUTY]i DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys, for DefendantTlSHMAi* REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788 F I L E D
APR » 5 20 p
eliisftegnMAR 2 9 2017
PART 50NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE BFlNE\$DWKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK I IL. L.U
==========================================XJOHN J. DEGNAN and SHEILA DEGN#IS,- S Mfl Index No. 104409-03
- against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to SARCO COMPANY, et al.,
PlaintBfiDNTYCLERK^SOFFI-
SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
Defendants.==========================================X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and assuccessor to Sarco Company (hereinafter “ SPIRAX SARCO” ) herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Pi / ~CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
Dated: White Plains, New York, 2017
JUSTIN SIEBEL, ESQ.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
So Ordered:
IRECEIMEOMAP, $ 9 “ 01/
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X:/FBW!i676t /leeal/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XWAYNE PAUL, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDPlaintiff(s), ORDER
- against - Index No.: 114934/07
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550
SO ORDERED, /7^Hon. Peter Moulton
William Cooney, Es^TAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Woks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th Flo&New York, New York 1&06(212) 313-3600 -3. g 81
mo ;x>. r^ rn» o-n
o
RECEIVEDMAR 3 « 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X:/FBWS5891/eeal/November2012SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
EDWARD RICH,X
PlaintifF(s),
- against -
FILEDAPR - 5 20( 1
NOJUDGMENT ftfOTiON ANDORDER
Index No.: 106352/05
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
&Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550
William Cooney, EsqTAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,Hon. PetePeter Moulton
BE©e^yMAR 3 0 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT CIVILIL
T
X:CLB/60225/DISMISSALS/NQSJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XSONIA G. DALTON, as Executrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYEUGENE S. DALTON, JUDGMENT MOTION AND
Plaintiffs), ORDER
- against - Index No.: 110362/08 & 106052/99
A.C.&S. INC., et al;
Defendants.x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice ando
without costs.
Ehan Alvaiadu, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
-5 25 —p -x) rm on rn70 'LO & ap-n
Shav tt5 sqAttomeysTor CLEAVER-BROOKS INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,/fiorf Peter Moulton
IBEOEWSBMAR 3 0 2017
PART 50i tiyg SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X:CLB/56773.Aesai/NOSJM FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWA^COUNTY OF NEW YORK ~ b
-cowifYetfRrs’OPFICEWFU/ Vnn^1NEW YORK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
DONALD SKELTON, JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 103009/08
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALLA.S. Part 50
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC• hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, /TZt-/Irkm. Peter Moulton
CLB55510/legal/nosjm/December 2011 ISUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 0COUNTY OF NEW YORK
MS.-S— MIXDONALD M. TAYLOR,
•NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
•against- Index No.: 103870/02
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorneys for DefendantWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED.fon. Peter Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
Index No. 119152-03
NYCAL
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against
defendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
KATHI LIOZZO, for the Estate ofBLANCHE MCDONALD,
Plaintiffs,v.
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., et al.Defendants.
%
A//
*%"S
ce
Brian Early, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs360 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017
nnis E>Vegfl7 tsq. UDennisITanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATIONOne Newark Center,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED, .^ * Unn DQ+CHon. Peter H. Moulton MM* S*1
83250869Vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
^^ v%%'X
KATHI LIOZZO, for the Estate of Index No. 119152-03BLANCHE MCDONALD,
Plaintiffs, NYCAL
v.AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., et al..
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse
Electric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs7
complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
Brian Early, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs360 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017
SO ORDERED,/ 'Hon. Peter H.Moulton
C
Dennis ITanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATIONOne Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
liSfwi®I m s1ml
83250869v1
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES HARVEY
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 102424/93
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
% ^%J- yf>
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: N^w/Yprk, N|ew York
, 2017rk^Npw ^
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffJames HarveyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,.£ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
1122-13366
RECEIVEDMAR 2 8 2017
PART $0NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES HARVEY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) co.Index No.: 102424/93
%\<<$'
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY v <%,
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ^WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ne^y YfokJ^w York„, 2017
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsJames HarveyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, .
icole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
IS Cl !DMAR 2 2 2017
1235-12824
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTATE OF JOHN A. JADUSAND
JOSEPHINE JADUS, INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 109428/98
"/•
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Ytjrk, Njbw York3/9M - 2017
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of John A. Jadus and Josephine Jadus,IndividuallyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
DECEIVEDMAR 82 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
324*2605
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARIO MAIORIELLOAND
SANTA MAIORIELLO
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 119382/00, 104046/01
W v<5'oX%rO
%NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter Sc Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter Sc Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New ^jork, New York
3ld3s 2°17
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario Maioriello and Santa MaiorielloWEITZ SC LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
NicoleP, Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter Sc Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY SC KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, .z Hon. Peter H. Moulton
1122-24573
RECEIVEDMAR 22 2017
PART 50MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:
COUNTY OF NEW YORKSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
MARIO MAIORIELLOAND
SANTA MAIORIELLO
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 119382/00,
<0
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: N^w Ylork, Ne^ York6 / .2017
Adam S, Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario Maioriello and Santa MaiorielloWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
1235-24835
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
A
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
EDWARD BENDERSKI,
Plaintiff,
-X
-X
- against -
A.C. and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary Judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF
signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.
Dated: 3"S 2017New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
Hon. Peter H. Moulton MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
A
Index No.: 122185/99In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
RALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P.ROBINSON As Co-Executors for the Estate ofJOSEPH L. MINERVINO,
- against -
A.C & S. INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: "3^8"/7 .-2016New York, New York
Matthew Maclnliye, r&yCInCfri S'
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. fe/ AlSDnAttorneys for Plaintiff J700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, —‘ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
I
Michael }( Testa, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
zm
-<o
-<omgCOo
s
“Y|i Fcn m
I'-Oo o
BECEWEE)
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 125799/99In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SANDRA W. CAPOGNA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ARMOND J.CAPOGNA,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONPlaintiff(s),
against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), etal.,
I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.
Dated: 3' 8"H ,20t6New York, New York s
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
s
SO ORDERED, ^^ non. Peter H. Moulton
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 116099/03
EDWARD BOLES, as Proposed Executor for theEstate of EUGENE E. BOLES,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for allpurposes of this motion.
Dated: 3/ (New York, New York
^2017
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
8c:
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
^m-<73
o-nom
70
cn&
aHOTL Peter H. Moulton
BEOEUWEOMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM,
Plaintiffs),
-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al.,
Defendants.
X
Ays-
^V
Index Nos.: 109036/200#>V
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York.New York
3k.New Yo
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
S£
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: .anne Ratcliffe, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
& Gaurav Talwar, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
BE EWEDMAR 2 2 2017
fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. ti 'i ’Vr e;r)
L - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for :the Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, and :CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for :the Estate of LOIS E.NUSBAUM, :
Plaintiffs), :
-against- :
A.C. and S., INC. et al., :
Defendants. :X
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 109036/2000
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkV i l j i jWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
By:Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SS
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLjKo % --Attorneys for Defendant The Gdticfyear Tire <£Rubber Cojnpany , ^
m
By: .M O
^Gaurav Talwar, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
om
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: — — —^ fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
IBi EDVEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SHARON W, RODGERS, as ADMINISTRATRIXand CAROL WEGENER as ADMINISTRATRIXfor the Estate of CHARLES M. WEGENER,
X
X
Plaintiffs),
-against-
NYCAL co,4^cO. 6
*Index Nos.: 121595/1998
4A \JS \
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ce
A.C. and S., INC. et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
^ Adam Dreklser, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:^ fJon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
iioiavEDlMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARIE T. MAGUIRE, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS K. MAGUIRE, and MARIE T. MAGUIRE,Individually
NYCAL % "3I.A.S. Part 50 C(Moulton, P.) ^Index No: 122013/199^^.NO OPPOSITIONJUDGMENT MOTION ArffeORDER Cv
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkV , 2017
Charles M. Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. 1
DARGER, Esq.1TE YA' [TZ & BLAU, LLP
Attorneys for CertainTeedlCorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,/ Msya. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
1BE(0EI!VEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART SONYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARIE T. MAGUIRE, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS K. MAGUIRE, and MARIE T. MAGUIRE,Individually
% ^NYCAL %, ^I A S. Part 50 +(Moulton, P.)Index No: 122013/1998 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMM^%JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER '
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ed^e^YDated<u£'Tew^York, New York
, 2017
WEITZ & LUXENBERG7T.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavit;DARGER ERR^ *sq.
TE YAVITZAttorneys for Dana Companies,116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
BLAU, LLP,LC
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HiCEIMiDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XLAWRENCE LEBROCQ AND MARIE LEBROCQ,HIS WIFE,
Index No.: 105719/2006
Plaintiffs, SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION
against-
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., individually and assuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc., (hereinafter “ SPIRAX SARCO” ) hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,
SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs. 0
Qg^prl- \A/hita Dloinc MatA/ Vnrl ^
KevWilentz Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FINew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Hodges Walsh & Messemer. ®LPAttorneys for Defendant £SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000
J.S.C.
MAR 3 0 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et at.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
1. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC
2. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
3. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AMERICAN HARDWARE AND PAINT CO., INC.
4. Anthony J. Caruso, Esq.Caruso Smith Edell Picini, PC60 Route 46 EastFairfield, NJ 07004Phone: 973-667-6000Fax: 973-667-1200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ASBEKA INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, INC.
5. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 1
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
6. Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th Street - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5378Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC.
7. Jennifer Darger, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th StreetNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5360Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BEAZER EAST INC.
8. John M. Guerriero, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7467Fax: 2012-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BW/IP, INC.
9. Andrew W. Dean, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212.651.7500Fax: 212.651.7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BW/IP, INC.
10. Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone:973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CBS CORPORATION
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 2
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
11. Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.Thompson Hine LLP335 Madison Avenue - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10017-4611Phone: 212-908-3957Fax: 212-344-6101Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CENTRAL HUDSON GAS 8i ELECTRIC CORPORATION
12. Stuart M. Goldstein, Esq.Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey, PLLCWillow Ridge Executive Office Park750 Route 73 South - Suite 202BMarlton, NJ 08053Phone: 856-810-7302Fax: 856-810-8861Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY
13. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
14. Kevin J. O’Toole, Esq.O'Toole, Fernandez, Weiner & Van Lieu, LLC14 Village Park RoadCedar Grove, NJ 07009Phone: 973-239-5700Fax: 973-239-3400Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION
15. Suzanne M. Halbardier, Esq.Barry McTiernan & Moore LLC2 Rector Street - 14th FloorNew York, NY 10006Phone: 212-313-3600Fax: 212-608-8901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CLEAVER-BROOKS INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002 }Page | 3
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
16. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L Gates, LLP599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022Phone: 212-536-3900Fax: 212-536-3901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CRANE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
17. Lissa Gipson, Esq.Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLPOne Liberty Plaza, 35th FloorNew York, NY 10006-1404Phone: (212) 412-9500Fax: (212) 964-9200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.
18. Grant A. Shehigian, Esq.Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLPOne Liberty Plaza - 35th FloorNew York, NY 10006-1404Phone: 212.412.9500Fax: 212.964.9200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.
19. Christian H. Gannon, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7409Fax: 212-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
20. John J. Delany, III, Esq.Delany McBride, P.C.36 Euclid StreetWoodbury, NJ 08096Phone: 856.202.8100Fax: 856.384.5957Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): DUCTMATE INDUSTRIES, INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 4
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
21. Joel R. Clark, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): DURO DYNE CORPORATION
22. Gary Van Lieu, Esq.O'Toole, Fernandez, Weiner 8t Van Lieu, LLC14 Village Park RoadCedar Grove, NJ 07009Phone: 973-239-5700Fax: 973-239-3400Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EStB MILL SUPPLY CO.
23. Nancy McDonald, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenueP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EDWARD VOGT VALVE COMPANY
24. Robert P. McManus, Esq.Ahmuty, Demers & McManus200 I.U. Willets RoadAlbetson, NY 11507Phone: 516.535.2440Fax: 516.294.5387Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EX-FM, INC.
25. Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone: 973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 5
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16; 2017
26. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
27. Denise D. Harris, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenueP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962-2075Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE US INC.
28. Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone: 973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FOSTER WHEELER, LLC
29. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FURINO & SONS, INC.
30. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGE A. FULLER COMPANY
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 6
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
31. Scott R. Emery, Esq.Lynch Daskal Emery LLP137 West 25th Street - 5th FloorNew York, NY 10001Phone: 212-302-2400Fax: 212-302-2210Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
32. Lawrence Lee, Esq.Lynch Daskal Emery LLP137 West 25th Street - 5th FloorNew York, NY 10001Phone: 212-302-2400Fax: 212-302-2210Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
33. Christian J. Soller, Esq.Hodgson Russ LLP677 Broadway - Suite 301Albany, NY 12207Phone: 518.465.2333Fax: 518.465.1567Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
34. Kristine M. Meeks, ParalegalGeorgia-Pacific LLC133 Peachtree Street NE, 39th FloorAtlanta, GA 30303Phone: 404-652-4526Fax: 404-487-4151Email: * *[email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
35. Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.McGivney 8t Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 7
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
36. Edward Fogarty, Esq.White & McSpedon875 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10001Phone: (212) 564-6633Fax: (212) 564-9799Attorneys for Defendant(s): GREENE, TWEED & COMPANY, INC.
37. Kevin C. Tierney, Esq.Tierney Law Offices1125 Land Title Building100 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19110-1029Phone: 215-790-2400Fax: 215-790-2409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GUYON GENERAL PIPING, INC.
38. Peter Stasz, Esq.H.B. Smith Company61 Union Street - Suite 2Westfield, MA 01085-2476Phone: (413) 568-3148Fax: (413) 568-0525Attorneys for Defendant(s): H.B. SMITH COMPANY, INC., THE
39. Marc S. Gaffrey, Esq.Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas40 Paterson StreetP.O. Box 480New Brunswick, NJ 08903Phone: 732-545-4717Fax: 732-545-4579Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): HUDSON IRON AND METAL COMPANY
40. Joseph G. Colao, Esq.Leader & Berkon, LLP630 Third Avenue, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: 212-486-2400Fax: 212-486-3099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): IMO INDUSTRIES INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 8
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
41. Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: 212-309-6246Fax: 212-309-6001Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ITT LLC
42. Donald E. WardSpecial Claims Services, Inc.809 Coshocton Avenue, Suite 1Mount Vernon, OH 43050-1931Phone: (740) 397-6700Fax: (740) 397-6701Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO., INC.
43. David P. Schaffer, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway - Suite 600New York, NY 10038Phone: 212-791-0285Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO., INC.
44. James Edwards, Esq.Ahmuty, Demers & McManus200 I.U. Willets RoadAlbertson, NY 11507Phone: (516) 294-5433Fax: (516) 294-5387Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): JOHANSEN COMPANY, THE
45. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney 8i Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): JOHN W. WALLACE & CO.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 9
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
46. Linda Dunne, Esq.Nowell Amoroso Klein Bierman, P.A.155 Polifly RoadHackensack, NJ 07601Phone: 201-343-5001Fax: 201-343-5181Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KING INSULATION COMPANY, INC.
47. Joel R. Clark, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KING INSULATION COMPANY, INC.
48. Kevin E. Hoffman, Esq.McGivney 8i Kluger, P.C.555 Route One South - Suite 140Iselin, NJ 08830Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KOENIG INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC.
49. Jeffrey S. Kluger, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973-822-1110Fax: 973-822-1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MADSEN & HOWELL, INC.
50. Mark Turner, Esq.Tierney Law Offices1125 Land Title Building100 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19110-01029Phone: 215-790-2400Fax: 215-790-2409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MAJOR INCORPORATED
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 10
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
51. John Fanning, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLP44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Phone: 212-701-4148Fax: 212-742-2156Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.
52. Kevin E. Hoffman, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.555 Route One South - Suite 140Iselin, NJ 08830Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MARSAM VALVES & FITTINGS CORPORATION
53. Joseph P. LaSala, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney 8i Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble RoadP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962-2075Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MUNACO SEALING SOLUTIONS, INC.
54. Andrew Sapon, Esq.Litchfield Cavo LLP420 Lexington Avenue - Suite 2104New York, NY 10170Phone: 212-792-9761Fax: 212-434-0105Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): O’CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
55. Suzanne M. Halbardier, Esq.Barry McTiernan & Moore LLC2 Rector Street - 14th FloorNew York, NY 10006Phone: 212-313-3600Fax: 212-608-8901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): OLYMPIC GLOVE AND SAFETY CO., INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 11
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
56. Andrew J. Czerepak, Esq.Richard W. Babinecz Law Offices4 Irving PlaceBorough of ManhattanNew York, NY 10003-3598Phone: (212) 460-3285Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC
57. Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th Street - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5378Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): PFAUDLER UNITED STATES INC.
58. Robert C. Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10038Phone: (212) 791-0285Fax: (212) 791-0286Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): PULMOSAN SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
59. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): RCH NEWCO II, LLC
60. Robert F. Ball, Esq.Weiner Lesniak, LLP629 Parsippany RoadParsippany, NJ 07054Phone: 973-602-3917Fax: 973-403-0010Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): RED-WHITE VALVE CORP.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 12
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
61. Russell Pepe, Esq.Harwood Lloyd, LLC130 Main StreetHackensack, NJ 07601Phone: 201-487-1080Fax: 201-487-4758Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SCHIAVONE-BONOMO CORPORATION
62. George S. Hodges, Esq.Hodges, Walsh, Messemer 8t Moroknek, LLP55 Church Street - Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Phone: 914-385-6000Fax: 914-385-6060Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SPiRAX SARCO, INC.
63. Jeffrey S. Kluger, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973-822-1110Fax: 973-822-1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SVI CORPORATION
64. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TISHMAN LIQUIDATING CORP.
65. Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.Pascarella DiVita, PLLC2137 Route 35 - Suite 290Holmdel, NJ 07733Phone: 732-837-9019Fax: 732-203-2380Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TRANE US, INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 13
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
66. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TREADWELL CORPORATION
67. John J. Kot, Esq.Waters, McPherson, McNeill, P.C.300 Lighting WayP.O. Box 1560Secaucus, NJ 07096-1560Phone: 201-330-7454Fax: 201-863-2866Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
68. Anthony J. Marino, Esq.Garrity, Graham, Murphy, Garofalo & Flinn72 Eagle Rock Avenue - Suite 350PO Box 438East Hanover, NJ 07936-3100Phone: 973-509-7500Fax: 973-509-0414Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): UNITED CONVEYOR CORP.
69. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION
70. Edward p. Abbot, Esq.Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP600 Lexington Avenue - 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022Phone: 212.897.9655Fax: 646.589.8700Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): VIKING PUMP INC.
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 14
\ 4-I
CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006
SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017
71. Steven R. Rosenblatt, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7424Fax: 212-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): WEIL-McLAIN
72. William F. Mueller, Esq.Clemente Mueller, P.A.218 Ridgedale AvenueCedar Knolls, NJ 07927Phone: 973-455-8008Fax: 973-455-8118Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY, THE
73. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ZURN INDUSTRIES OF DELAWARE, LLC
74. Diane H. Miller, Esq.Littleton Joyce Ughetta Park 8t Kelly LLP4 Manhattanville Road - Suite 202Purchase, NY 10577Phone: 914.417.3400Fax: 914.417.3401Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ZY-TECH GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNKNOWN COUNSELASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY CO., INC.BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD.CLAYBURN CONSTRUCTION CORP.ELIZABETH PLUMBING & HEATINGSUPPLY CO., INC.INDUSTRIAL RUBBER COMPANYJOULE, INC.
L&H PLUMBING & HEATING SUPPLIES, INC.LUNKENHEIMER CORPORATION, THENEW JERSEY BOILER REPAIR COMPANYNORTH CAROLINA ENTERPRISES CO., INC.SCHUTTE and KOERTING, INC.STERLING PLASTICS AND RUBBERPRODUCTS, INC
#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 15
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTERSS.:)
)
YELENA STIFEYEVA being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am employed by the law firm of HODGES WALSH & MESSEMER, LLP,
counsel for Defendant in the above action and I am over the age of 18 years and I am not
a party to this action. On March 21, 2017, 1 served a true copy of the annexed Second No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion in the following manner: by mailing same in a
sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a post office or official depository of
the U.S. Postal Service within the State of New York addressed to the last known address
of all attorneys in this action as indicated below:
TO: Wilentz Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William St., 26th FINew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
Defense Counsel of Record (via e-mail corresondence)
All parties of record in the attached Service List have been notified of the service of theNo Opposition Summary Judgment Motion on plaintiffs counsel.
Yelena Stifeyeva
Sworn to before me this91st 9017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILLIAM WEIGOLD SR.AND
DOROTHY WEIGOLD
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 121090/02, 113276/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.,with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., be and the same are hei§>y dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y^rk, Ne|v York
<3 / . 2017
'AAdam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWilliam Weigold Sr. and Dorothy WeigoldWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
§
mo §=££ *-< =*> A,Opt; cn
O
Z!sson A. Null, Esq.
Attorney for DefendantDap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED;
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
EECMAR 2 2 1017
REMECOURT - CWU-NYSSUP
04-0719
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for the Estateof THOMAS J.MURRAY, and PATRICIAMURRAY, Individually,
Plaintiffs),
-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al.,
X
X
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 119472-01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorktsfiijiTWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
By:S e Ratcliffe, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &
.Rubber Company
By: _S^) ^Dan Gagnardi, Esq.
<2New York, New York 10001 4<? ^137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor
(212) 302-2400 # ££
£o
SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
G?E(SII1WEDMAR 2 2 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
Index No.: 119472-01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for the Estateof THOMAS J. MURRAY, and PATRICIAMURRAY, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al,,
Defendants.
complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New Yojk, Fjfew YorkYork, NewmhWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
i A/uBy!anne Ratcliffe, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: .
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
£- fIt j*
# %/<•
Pi
SO ORDERED:/ 7 T THon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
IRECEOWEDMAR 22 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JEANNETTE M.MICHAEL,as Administratrix forthe Estate of GERMANO A.KUHN
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 108950/2001
%
'ceNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3~ X , 2017
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. 3
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A^Yavitz, Esq. 1DARGER ERRANTE MAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carwde Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, STA.
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
pARrn?tRT - CIVIL
f
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.AS. Part 50Index No: 104096-99This Document Relates to:
ANTHONY SABIN and CAROL SABINNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, sued herein as “ Dana Corporation” ,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Companies,
LLC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkZjlI . 2017
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway
DARGEILERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Judith A. Jfayftz, Esq.DARGERERRANTE
New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,''fton. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 104096-99This Document Relates to:
ANTHONY SABIN and CAROL SABINNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkb f 11 , 2017
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavyfz, >Esq.DARGER ER^NTE YAVffTZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Qorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FlobrNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,^Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 102153
GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New w York2017
Susan Barlow, EsqSusan Barlow, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavit / Esq.DARGER ELRJUNTE YAY TZ & BLAttorneys for Dana Compai lies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Yavit/; Esq.ELRRANTE YAY TZ & BLAU, LLP
SO ORDERED,6 f^on. Peter H. Moulton
MAR 2 2 Z017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
A
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 102153/2003This Document Relates to:
GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Ne 1 'T w York2017
smanBariowTEs^WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
JJudith A. Y^ W Esq. 7DARGER EJKRANTE YAVETZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloVorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, '
lion. Peter H. Moulton
MAR 2 2 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
%>r "S
Index No.: 118531/02ROBERT J.SHANSTROM andRITA M.SHANSTROM NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC fk/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named
as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3-8 2017
Charles Ferguson, EsqNJWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
-f®DEliWEDMAR 23 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
3265190