following this cover page are scanned images of no ... supreme court of the state of new york county...

144
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: phungnhu

Post on 02-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This Document Relates To:

EFREN CARBONELL, Individually and asSpecial Administrator to the Estate of PUBLIOCARBONELL SOTO, Deceased,

-x

-x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No.: 190452-10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,

(hereinafter “ Abex” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Abex, with

prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: n /' ftUisIsJ h3.2015

YorkY

Atto iffOX LLPB U(

4th Floor546NY10036New

(212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED,

. Safgente, Esq.HAWKINsllPARNELL THACKSTON

& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interests^to Abex Corporation * v*600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloprV rflyiNew York, New York 10022-V78* V ^(212) 897-9655 ' ^

^ -ffon. Peter H. Moulton

eieiiivEDMAR 2 9 2017

11047615V.1PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

WILLIAM V. KELLER

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.190033/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

F I L E Dthe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,?-/? , 2017

ilTZ & LUXENBERGTT.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

MES EDWARDSMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS

Attorneys for DefendantTISIIMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION

rrlNC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,T Hon. Peter H. Moulton

ElECEffVEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART SONYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

JOSEPH DAVIS

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.190022/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York.?-/? 2017

(Juries .WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

n, P.C.

5WARDSAHMJTY^DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant

JM£N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED, /is#./ Hon. Peter H. Moulton IRECiWED

MAR 2 9 2017j! PART 50I SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

THOMAS DOUGHERTY

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.190066/08

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3-!3 2017

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

Charles JemfeonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERKIBS-AWARDS"

AHMUTO, DEMERS & McMANUSAttofcqeys'for Defendant

N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,

7 Hon. Peter H. Moulton IREOEWEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

HERMAN BRESSEL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.190112/10190046/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

3~13 2017APR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

WAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

JAMES EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,

^ ^ Hon. Peter H. MoultonMAR 2 9 2017

MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

GtfloitfteSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xJOHN M. ANTICO and PATRICIA M. ANTICO, Index No.: 190032/08

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al ,

Defendants.x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. /

RTRRO, ESQ/ /U M R Y I C, . S H AThe Early Law Firm *Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton

A. FLUITT, ESQ.Barry, McTieman & Moore, LLCAttorneys for: Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006Tel.: (212) 313-3600

_Our File No.: CLEKJSL E D

APR 05 2M7NEW YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

RECEIVEDMAR 3 o

-^COURT - CIVIL

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

X:/KMA/S426S/dkml!t*als/M*lm

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiffs),

•against Index No.: 190150/10

AFTON PUMPS, INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendants.•X

WHEREFORE,defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, jORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants JOHN CRANE INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Locks Law Firm747 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017

NJarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th Floor 1

New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

*

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This Document Relates To:

MICHELE ALFANO, as Executrix of the Estate ofANTOINETTE A. KISZKIEL a/k/a ANNKISZKIEL, deceased,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

Plaintiffs),Index No. 190025/2012

- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTORJCOMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: Ne?aYora, New York

By: JordWFoK, Bsq. jBELLU(|K &WOX , LLP546 5th Avenue4th FloorNew York, New York 10036Counsel for Edward Simicich

By: Adam Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FDEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for Defendant

fisLL.E OAPR 05 2017

Ford Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:S' HON. PETER H. MOULTON

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

IIAD - ianco awaadns SANos iavd

L\U zz avwOlAfllOiy{01782788.DOCX }

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190083/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,

as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, NewTfork

J & . 2017

Jordan Fox, Esg// 'Joseph Belluck,®®q.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

M i M o jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED, <2-Hon. Peter H. Moulton

lF?E©E[IVE©MAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190083/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’ ) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Y< , New XibrkMqiTfolC. . 2017

Jordan Fox, ifsqiJoseph Belluok^Es^.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

SO ORDERED,/

on/Teter H. Moulton

i Mjjjkj jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

E .(SHOWEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190083/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.1

Dated: New Yofx/ New Yjprk

lf teW;/ 2017

Jordan Fox, EfsqJoseph Belluok?*]Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

SO ORDERED,

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DAPR 05 20\7

^smsssrRESEOYEO

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190083/2011

DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

r >rk

_, 2017

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

BUh j

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTAPR 05 20tf

SO ORDERED,

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,

Plaintiffs),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190319/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewYo: Ne York

6 , 2017

Jordan Fox, E£Joseph Belluck, !Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

Beth L. Hughes, £sq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,4Jon^reter H. Moulton

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

F&i©E0WEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

/

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DOMINICK JOHN CELENTANO andCATHERINE ANNE CELENTANO,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190083/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to

Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Jfjbrl^ Nejw York

vM IG , 2017

Jordan Foxi EM.Joseph BellWj/,[E£q.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

S/M jBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNT;' CLERK

F8EOE1WEDMAR 2 2 2117

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,

Plaintiffs),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190319/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: YorkNe N Yorkw>lb , 2017

sq.Jordan Fox lJoseph Bell'Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

/to i Mfjld)Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

SO ORDERED,IJpn. p^ter H. Moulton

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

F I L E DCTO 5 20)7

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNT/ CLERK

IREOEUWiDMAR 02 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,

Plaintiffs),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190319/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International

(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New ork

Vx,

New York

>\ . If ) . 2017

Jordan FpJoseph Beh&ck,'Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

, y/SO ORDERED, /

fyjlh l kujjbuBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

/Horn Peter H. Moulton

F I L E Dtn t iTSf

NE'WVOfK. COUNTYQOUN >

PEWEGEwWK ***'1

NYSSU

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

*

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

/

Index No: 190319/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to

Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: YorW New York

, 2017

N

Jordan ]

Joseph teell*tJ{,ftisq.Belluck^/Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

8l&lBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,H6n. Peter H.'Moultontt

APR OS 2017NEW YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK[RECEDED

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of theEstate of DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190319/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,

as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Y« k York

Ifc , 2017

e

Jordan Fox/EpJoseph BeMuck' Es'q.Belluck <SrFox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

iM/ jjjUlJBeth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

SO ORDERED,/Jlon. Pete/H. Moulton

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

ffiECEBWEDMAR 22 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190005/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International(US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Lonergan Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New/ rk, Yorke

, 2017

Eid.Jordan Fox, EscJoseph BaLlucJizy ]

Belluck <SLFOX LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

tfR 05 RECEIVEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NVS SUPREME: COURT - CIVIC

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190005/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International

(US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc, as successor to Hancock Valves be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YjDfk, Np^Yor^SikjUvjfiu

Beth L. Hughes, Eisq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Mmh/k, , 2017

Jordan Fox, EfJoseph Belluclf wBelluck & FoxXLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

Sieiw®m^ 1017

NYS SUPKt

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190005/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco International (US), Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New Y< York

5 fe 2017

Jordan Fox, ]

Joseph Belmck^Esq.Belluck & IMx LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

M1l MjDthuT Himlipc Pt<~iBeth L. Hughes, Esq.

Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,H(m. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

IMECEOVE©MAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190005/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to

Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Tyco Flow Control, as successor to Keystone be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without jcpsts.

Dated: Ne1 ^ork,v)New YorkN I t , 2017

Jordan FoLiffiq?Joseph Belluck, Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTSCOUNTY CLERK

F8EOEOVIDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN JR, as Executor ofthe Estate of ROBIN BISHOP ALLEN,deceased,

Plaintiffs),vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL.,Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 190005/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Tyco International (US), Inc.,as successor to Keystone with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Tyco International (US), Inc., as successor to Keystone be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: foikJ New York

, 2017

Jordan Fok, ]

Joseph Beikftk^Esq.Belluck & Fox LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,Hq^Peter H. Moulton F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

'ScMiwMW ]MAR 2 2 2017 j

^<4• CfVIL j

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190174/09PAUL MILLER and LOUISE MILLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC”) hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

5 <S . 2017

--David J. Baity, Esq^^feS fcmA&AWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ^700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED, XT? -*-

^on Peter H. Moulton |J|^APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTY

COLT .TV CLERK

iiOIWEDMAR 23 2017

- c.nNYS • H’VU.

2558486

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

Index No.: 190355/2010MARC ROSE and MARILYN ROSE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2017

XL

Matthew T. MacIntyre; Esq^/q#Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. F&T%U3DP-700 Broadway, 6th Floor 0New York, NY 10003

Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,£ Hon. P<on. Peter H. Moulton F I L E D

APR 05 2017NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

BltOiWiSMAR 2 3 2017

P' 50HYS So'1-; - ,

• CWIL

3265322

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190055/11

ELIEZER BARASCH, as Administrator of theEstate of STANLEY S. BARASCH, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical,

Inc. and Cutler-Hammer, Inc. (improperly pled as Eaton Electrical (Individually and as successor-in-

interest to Cutler Hammer) (“ Eaton” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

Eaton with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Eaton are and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical, Inc. and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, NY 10281

The Lanier Law Firm, PLLC126 East 56th Street, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED,/ HotfTPeter H. Moulton IIAID - iynco 3waadns SAN

05 ±yvd

3284967

YORK COUNTV Z i O Z g S N V WCOUNTY CLERK

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CHARLES P. BLAND

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190007/2012

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

3/0 - 2017

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judhti A/Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANT# YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, lfc* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

^/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F I L E D

IBECEWEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART SOI ms SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190112/10In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

FRANCOISE BRESSEL as Administrate for theEstate of HERMAN H. BRESSEL, andFRANCOISE BRESSEL, Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

Plaintiffs),- against - I.A.S.Part 50

Hon. Peter H. MoultonA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: 3~g~ /7New York, New York

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Oinvjmx WKr 1 J.

Attorneys for Defendant CO'-"'*Weil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

;_XJOHN M. ANTICO and PATRICIA M. ANTICO,

Plaintiffs,Index No.: 190032/08

- against -

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,Defendants.

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summaiy Judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s

complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No

Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF

signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.

Dated: OS I 17 2017New York, New York *

/v\AMark R. Bibro, Esq. ^The Early Law Firm, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017

J JNjsM/S’. LakhaniJfes'tiSegal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, ^Hon. Peter H. MoultonF I L E D

APR 0 5 2017rc ‘:w YORK COUNTY

COUNTY CLERK

P5ECEWE©MAR 2 2 2017

| PART 50I uvq SUPREME COURT - Civil

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50Moulton, P.

This Document Relates to:Index No. 190491/2011

PAUL J. DELUCA and VIOLA DELUCA,

-against-Plaintiffs.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER AS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al, i

Defendants. ;

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated * New York New York

Charles Ferguson, Esq.A xu niAttorney for Defendant

Peerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300

New York, NY 10003212.558.5500

File No. 1863.28172 F I L T

4845-4966-9699.1

SO ORDEREDffon. Peter II. Moulton APR 0 5

NEW YORK C(COUNTY CL

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALBERTA TONUCCI, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of RAYMONDTONUCCI, and ALBERTA TONUCCI,Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

%

Index No.: 105449/99

-/A*'ee

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC fk/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorky -% . 2017

/ 1/1/ L

Charles Ferguson,Tisq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew F. ain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,Mon. Peter H. Moulton

REClWp jMAR % 3 2017: ; "• ; -

PAST 50N Y S S U P R ^ : ' • - ‘ r I V1L

3262203

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WILLIAM JORDAN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

A% % $0

Index No.: 113156/1998

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC f/k/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC”) hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

3~ K , 2017

Dana M. Norihcraft,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. p Zf&JSDn700 Broadway, 6th Floor (JNew York, NY 10003

Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,'Hon. Peter H. Moulton

r ' v;3262253

REG#.#1

MAR 2 3 2017

NYS SUPREME CCUPT rTyu-

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)— x

This Document Relates To: Index No.: 111957-04 -cJAMES G. KUTKUHN and BARBARA L.KUTKUHN, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT %MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,

incorrectly sued herein as “ PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION,” (hereinafter “ Abex”), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Abex, with prejudice, there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

ed with prejudice and without costs.1016

& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC,Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7878(212) 897-9655

New York, NY10036(212) 681-1575

Hdn. Peter H. Moulton

11047615V.1 MAR 2 9 2017PART SO

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

j Index No,: 115842/0

NYCALI,A,S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

JOHN MCCLOSKEYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs,

Attorney forPlaintiffJohn McCloskeyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Tishman Liquidating Corp.McGrvNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERE

2383-27339

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

APR -sc° Tyr , ° 1111

X

DAVID J. RENZ, as Executor for the Estate of HERBERT RENZ, Index No. 109573-2002and MAUREEN RENZ, Individually,

Plaintiffs,-against-

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT

A.C. and S. INC. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant ROPER PUMP COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against ROPER PUMP COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantROPER PUMP COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York

7

arles Fereuson. Esa.Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

/

StepheVNevSlddis/Tisq.Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneysfor Defendant Roper Pump Company150 Broadway,Suite 600New York, NY 10038

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Dated:

KE©E1VE0MAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YflfJK 5 7(j|-|COUNTY OF NEW YORK

^EC!® EIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONN

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD HENN and VIRGINIA HENN,

Plaintiffs,vs.A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.

[RECEIVEDMAR 22 20W

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 104802/2008

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., n/k/a Goulds Pumps LLC hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc,, n/k/a Goulds Pumps

LLC, only, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., n/k/a Goulds Pumps LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

Joseph Belmck, Esq.Jordan Fpx, Esq.Belluck & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Phone: (212) 681-1575

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

^Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SO ORDERED,,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

THOMAS J. MURRAYAND

PATRICIA MURRAY

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 119472/01, 111220/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New York,NAv York

3 Iftrll . 2017

Aaam S. Dreksler, Esqiam S. Dreksler, Esq,

Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas J. Murray and Patricia MurrayWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

/,

czJasjm A. Null, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks Company agMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 30

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004^(212) 509-3456 o s

s

cn

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

504-1111

RECt ;DMAR 22 2017

PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

FILED

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 109036/00, 122188/99

ESTATE OF WALLACE G. NUSBAUM /NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed wilg prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Wallace G. NusbaumWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,^ non. reier n. iviouuon

504-1519

Q3-A\4

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 109036/00, 122188/99

ESTATE OF WALLACE G. NUSBAUMNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Adam S, Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Wallace G. NusbaumWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

2383-26065AA

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SHERRY ANN COONS, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANTHONY T. PALLONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)Index No.: 105600/03, 126937/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againsto

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkMarCY } fa . 2017

hereby dismissed witlSprejudice

§? ^ r~£ - rn

$ o

Justin Weitz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffEstate of Anthony T. PalloneWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

KeniSnn Mjgfook. ESQ.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,.(y Hon. Peter H. Moulton

1235-9210

ifiSECSEOWEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

f

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS L]ros Lnrfo rfoN-x

This Document Relates to:

JOHN J. CURLEY

4P/KmwY s-tm- X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.120398/01104830/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againsto

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REAlSY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3-/3 2017

& —ChflrliZS' fertuSDflWEITZ & LUXENBERG' P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

Mmo 3O r*m

cn mGO S3pc oo-n2}om

MES EDWAHMUTY,\DEMERS & McMANUS

\ Attorneys for DefendantX. TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION^ Q., INQ. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED, si*^fion. Peter H. Moulton IBEOEWE©MAR 2 9 2017

PART 50\ is!VS SUPREME COURT - CIVI

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOX

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH L. MINERVINO

-m-^-5-wf -X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.122185/99109247/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York o3- /3 2017— -

Charles Rs4>s&nWEITZ & LUXENRERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTYHOLDINGS,

INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

a_< -nss ? r-

IRDSAHMJTYvJ)EMERS & M2j&CANIg|Attorneys for Defendant ^ ^IRISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION

O

SO ORDERED

^ Hon. Feter H. Moulton BECEWEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50I NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBEST(^l|[|lG^]^K ^This Document Relates to:

ARNOLD YARCZOWER

APR -5 X

“uncEVE?«Wf,c£

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.122138/01102724/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2.02 , 201702 .

Qharj/X' F&mtfonIITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.WEI1

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

oo% -n

7 r-cx> cn

O — j

moBDWARDS

AHMUTY, pEMERS & McMAlftjSAttorneys for Defendant

*>N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton REOEOWED

MAR 2 9 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

T

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LT

\

This Document Relates to:

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ

-WUS-lBkC0UNTWSK0FF'Ct

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.109536/00121990/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X SEPTEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

Charles Jtf&LWrEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.W

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

LARB5»

oo§— *

'n2».5P 5n-j3^3o tn

U1o o1UTY,NDEMERS & McM^NUSAttorHeys forDefendant oTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,U Hon. Peter H. Moulton

[RECEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ^

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH A. GABRJELLI

cou%wmcf

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.104669/00125779/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO, , INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York?- /? 2017

AhaHes FMAWIWE1TZ & LUXENBIJJKG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, — —Hon. Peter H. Moulton

oocz2=

SgC2Q V

JAMESAHMU

3DW^RE>S f~/, DEMERS & MdVtgSbscn

tjorneys mr Defendant ^TISflMAlOlEALTY & CONSTRUCTION WCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY§OLDINGS,INC. m199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

RECEIVED! MAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NyS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

t

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.110331/03

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X JUNE 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3'13 2017

CmridS ferbu&nWEITZ & LUXENBERC, RC.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

4 «,

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

JAMES-EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant

1MAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO.riNr: n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

ilolwii'MAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)X

This Document Relates to:

RAYMOND TONUCCIIndex No.105449/99

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERJUNE 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorki i UIA, nvw ivi f t

3-13 2017

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

MAR 2 9 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

KENNETH W. MAXWELL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.107598/00122189/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X JUNE 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York'3' ( 3 . 2017rx~

Charles fa&usonWEITZ & LUXENBERO, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

f \ \-£°SO ORDERED,

HonHon. Peter H. Moulton

JAMES EDfWARDSAHMVrY,\DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION

1n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

DECEIVEDMAR 2 9 201?

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

NICHOLAS MANGINELLI

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.109020/00121979/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X JUNE 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

Charles RmusonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

JAMES EDWARDSf , DEMERS & McMANUS

Attori^ys for'Defendant.TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION

h^JLNCS^/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton «51®1

N0NOUNT*

COUNT*

REGHVEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

WILLIAM L.TRUCKS SR. and MARCIATRUCKS,

Plaintiffs),

-against-A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al,

Defendants.WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon, Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 107340/2001

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.7UDated:

New ’V/orJ^ Neew York

Vila*Brett Fuller, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,r/2LHon. Peter H. Moulton

KirstenXlford Kneis, Esq.K&L^ATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

tU-ED HEOEWEOMAR 2 0 2017

PART 50SUPREME COU*T - CIVIL

NYS

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ALICE GOLIGHTLY, as Executrix for the Estateof JOHN GOLIGHTLY and ALICE GOLIGHTLY,Individually,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Plaintiffs),Index No.:112029/2008

-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants. — xWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

BrettWEFAttor700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Datet

CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, F I L E DHon. Peter H. Moulton

MAR 2 0 2017PART 50

IMYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIl

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

DAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for the :Estate of FREDERICK P. KELLY JR., :

BiOillViOMAR 16 2017

PART 50MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NYCAL

Index No.: 108282/99

Plaintiffs),

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al,Defendants. Hon. Peter H. Moulton,

IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and GoodyearCanada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire Sc Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

3-g-nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:-FrarirOTtfzTEsqT >0Charles Fer&USon

700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire 8cRubber Company and GoMveapCanada Inc.By:

Lawrence G. Leg^fesq.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400 F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017SO ORDERED: .£ Hon. Peter H, Moulton, J.S.C.

MEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:X

NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

XDAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for the :Estate of FREDRICK P. KELLY JR., :

NYCAL

IHEOEIIViBMAR 16 1017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

Index Nos.: 108282/99

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

iDefendants. :

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: Rv- ^Frank OrtizrEsq.&haH S Ftttsuscnadwav700 Broadway

New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

_F I L E D

APR 0 5 2017

SO ORDERED:C' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DAVID F. KELLY as Personal Representative for theEstate of FREDRICK P. KELLY JR.,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.C. and S., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

X: NYCAL

XIndex Nos.: 108282/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

3-x ~nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:FrntiV Orti? F

~^n

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By:Frank-Qrtiz, Esq.Charles Reason700 Broadway J

New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(2

^12|30^4(gj

APR 0 5 2017

SO ORDERED?

NEW YORK COUNTYQQIJNTVXLERK

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

IBEQEIIVEBMAR 16 2017

NySSUPREMERCOURT. CIVIL

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS, :

Plaintiff(s), :

NYCAL / ^ 1 6 2017 lc /Index Nos.: 113781/02

106690/02

-against- :

A.C. and S., INC., et al., :

Defendants. :

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

c?-£-/7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

Rv. <^> <5^—Flunk OitizrEsq.

Charles f&qason-700 Broadway uNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New YorkAPR 0 5 2017

C Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. — -

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By:Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

P I L E D

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,

X

X

PlaintifF(s),

NYCAL I'^^ESl

Index NosOP,,

: 113781702106690/02

-against-A.C. and S., INC., et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. :

X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:Frank Ortiz, LgqChcoHes

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

P&ju$ori

Bv:Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001

:400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

(2121302.2F I L E DuPROsa®

dSoSSSSa*'Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

IBEOEDVEDMAR 10 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

JAMES R. REYNOLDS,

Plaintiffs),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

-X

-X

NYCAL16 2017

' CIVILJIndex Nos.: 113781/02;106690/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire 8c Rubber Company and Goodyear* Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: .T?on iifc 1 ^Virf+r=r,,P"W n ~rFfankrCWtzrSsq.Qharids ferquson

700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Good#ar Canada Inc.By: t jUJU '

6xawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400 F I L E D

Dated: New York, New York APR 0 5 2017

SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of MILTON GOODBAR,

X

X Wit

NYCAL

Index No: 190009/2012

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. :X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

3 -/7

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

By:Adam Drckslcr, Egqy \

Chadts Festft&n700 Broadway UNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

By:Andrew Mundo, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

r i L E DAP* 05 20I?

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NORMA JEAN PETERSON, as Personal Representative for theEstate of ALDEN L. PETERSON, and NORMA JEANPETERSON, Individually,

X

X

Plaintififfs),

-against- :

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL, :

Defendants.X

DECEIVEDMAR 16 2017

NYCA SUPREPMAERCOURT . CIV1L

Index No: 190437/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New York* New York

3-S 77WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:tisa Busch,Esq. *"*

New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

By:Alexander Broche, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----- — X

In Re New York COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

CORDELL J. BELLACH,

Plaintiff,

-against-

c \ v.e0

BP AMERICA INC., et al,Defendant.

X

[RECEIVEDMAR 15 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 190267/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTBP AMERICA INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant BP AMERICA INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant BP AMERICA INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

BP AMERICA INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:Feb.^.3 to'iPft—Harrison, NY

Brian Early, Esq.Early. Lucarelli, Sweeney &MeisenkothenAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233

Russell S. Jamison, E^MARIN GOODMAN/LLP.Attorneys for DefendantBP AMERICA INC.,500 Mamaroneck Ave., Suite 501Harrison, NY 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED:

/0.L. —^/Honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROBERT GRAVES and MARGARET GRAVES,

X

X

Plaintiffs),

/ M A R I S 2017

"YCAb i^aviL IIndex Nos.: 111622/03

113488/03190080/08

-against-

CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC., successor bymerger to CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSEELECTRIC CORPORATION,

Defendants. :X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

7-^/7

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: .Frank Qrtiz

^Esq.Charts tebus&i

700 Broadway JNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York F I L E DAPR 05 2017

SO ORDERED:/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C?

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

JOHN HAUGH, JR. and MAUREEN HAUGH, asCo-Executors of the Estate of JOHN HAUGH, andMARGARET HAUGH, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)., et al,

NYCALLAS. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 120465/2000

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: # yft3*4veiT mffaaw York. Nfcw York *:w York, mw York

wFrank OitieHSsqt Adoim DrcYS ter < EsqWEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.¥JzL GATES LLPAttorneys for Defendam

CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

Hon. Peter H. MoultonAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

ffSEOEWE©MW) 20 2017

PART 50ISIYS SUPREME COUftT - CIVIL [

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: :

CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for theEstate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for theEstate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon.Peter Moulton)

Plaintiff, Index No.: 109036-00

AC&S, INC.,et al.,-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff’s complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

rsielwlBSO ORDERED,AM ° 5 20 ff MAR 2 0 2017

NcnSc°WTyCOUNTY CLERKPART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-xThis Document Relates To:

WILLIAM L.TRUCKS SR. and MARCIATRUCKS,

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Plaintiffs),Index No.: 119377/2000-against-

A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al,

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.•x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO.be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, F I L E Dt Hon, Peter H. Moulton

NEW YORK COUNTY MAR 2 0 2017COUNTY CLERK

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

Tins Document Relates to:

REZZIERO F. DEL GALLO and BARBARADEL GALLO

NYCAL ^ ^I.A.S. Part 50 %(Moulton, P) ^ ^Index No.: 119626-01; 11lS%6 & ^113279-97; 1110^8 ^108752-99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARkV"JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: NewYork, New York

.2017

Charles Ferguson, EsqX^)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

Alidrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

YanisCo rycC^7Y

RE© IDMAR 2 3 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

3266255

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DONALD CIMATO

ANYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 112912/1998 &NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York:s~ff .2017

s2_

Charles Ferguson^ EsqTWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,fton. Peter H. Moulton ^L E D

APR 05 2017(REOiOWED

MAR 23 2017PART 50

N',r ' CIVIL

3262230

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:(Moulton, P.) 'V&fy tyjIndex No. 103881/2003 % °*>/q

RICHARD METZ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Lipe Automation Corporation (“ Lipe” ) hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Lipe with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Lipe be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 7

^vidj. Bur^afg'

h^rt^JWeitz & Luxenberg, PC JAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

New York, New York

Brian Sorensen, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Lipe AutomationCorporation88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED,

3200826_1

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM

%' <* ^NYCAL u*ry "S

I.A.S. Part 50 4^, $/ )

Index No: 109036/0 n F/Cj~NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2017

/Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A.DARGEF

tvitz, Esq.RRANTE LVITZ & BLAU, LLP

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, l^1 FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

RECEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 109036/00

cO,% * %y0/$0Pp

y

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Gould Electronics Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Gould Electronics Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Gould Electronics Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkMflroh . 2017

v

Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Megan McGovern, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Gould Electronics Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

IRBSEflWEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50HYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY- - - XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION- - XThis Document Relates to:Joseph C. McKendry,

IRECEIIWEDMAR 16 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL

I.A.S. ParL 50(J. Moulton)

Index No.:113335/01

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A .o. Smith Water Products Co. f et al.

NO-OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.| X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civ _ J.i

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaint iff:s ’

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC, , with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all

claims and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,

be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

1 /ijR- r'a017

ifet.fcJa&aL.J-ar.aa.QjE.iEv, Ester. . Ryan'JJ. BarnesV Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for DefendantJoseph C. McKendry700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED:

Peter H. Moulton

Goulds Pumps, Inc. o44 Wall Street, 15l:h Floq§?New York, New York lOOCE^Our File NO. : 6754 -6

jAIon .

“A Coto

§c--

O

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORJELLO,

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO, et al ,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

</>

Index No.: 119382/00104046/01; 100759/03

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§ 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS

COMPANY with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Wfciti 'lains, New York/7? ,2017

Ljjilra B. Hollmanft£sq.Attorney for DefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

Mm $Yi-rh_I^lsanlJarlow, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

{V0369883.1}

1 1

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

536.17068/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

%

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

AMERICO A. VARI,

Plaintiff,

-against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 110331/03

(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: 3~8 ~/ ~7East Hanover, New Jersey

4ATTHEW frlACINTMATTHEW MitCD4T¥RirE^.WEITZ & LUXENBERG. ^>cAttorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway 0f tNew York, New York 10003 J

STEPHEN F. BA^SAMO,ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

^Horforable Peter H Moulton

I MAR 2 2 2017 I

Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

536.10758/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

This document relates to:

NICHOLAS MANGINELLI, Deceased,Index No.: 109020/00

121979/99

Plaintiff,(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)

against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:East Hanover, New Jersey

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,lorable Peter H. Moulton - RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

MAR 2 2 2017

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

536.07909/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

THOMAS MAGUIRE, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

-against-UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al.,

NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 122013/98

(June 2015 FIFO Trial Group)

NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

C.//

V ^ V/s

* V>

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against

defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United

Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: 3 S' HEast Hanover, New Jersey

MATTHEW MACINT-WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

XQCh&rltriesFcrfysrn

STEPHEN f.GARRJTY,& FLINN

ILSAMO, ESQ.HAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO

Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, —e tjprforable Peter H. Moultonv , . -CIVIL-1ST JD ;

i 2 2 2017 jHON. PETER H. MOUIT^" ]ADMINISTRATIVE J

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

. . .I i i*

%

D T-

APR - 5 7 ~ HSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OB.NEWYORK - ..-COUNTY OF NEW YORK ^YCR;; ^ ~— —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL

ROBERT GRAVES,

Plaintiffs),

i^Eeiswisi/ MAR i g 2017 /

-XIndex Nos.: 111622/03;113488/03; 190080/08

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and GoodyearCanada Inc.hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company andGoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the sameare hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York_ r/,7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:

Ccfa%H S Fertfu&n700 Broadway JNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cpfnpany and/Goodyear Canada Inc.

Lawrence Qs^xe, Esq.264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:£ Hon. Peter PL Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW1COUNTY OF NEW YORK

-42*-IN RE: NEW YORK CITY . :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION-* ‘'\pil 'S,0Fri:CE

*(Ue-i— *44--X

r4WROBERT GRAVES and MARGARET GRAVES,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC., successor bymerger to CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSEELECTRIC CORPORATION,

Defendants.

-X

nwlSlBMAR 16 2017

2222?^. CIVIL

NYCA:

Index Nos.: 111622/03113488/03190080/08

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

- X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorknWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By:

Rubber Company

Rv- rCC eT? ^ -" U D ATVMAITFrank-Grtiz, Esq.

Charles ferftASorirlwav v700 Broadway

New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Kate H. Romick, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

BISIWEOMAR 16 2017

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. 05 2017

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to;

JOANN LIVINGSTON, as Executrix for theEstate of LOUIS R. ADAMS and MARY

LOUISE ADAMS, Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.: 100919/03,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkn , 2016

Attorney for PlaintiffsLouis R. Adams and Mary Louise AdamsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

KetTyjgnrTM^C<3ok. Esq.AttorneyTor"DefendantCourter Sc Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY SC KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,cT Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

IRECEWE©

PART 50MYS SUPREME COURT CIVIL

1122-18640

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOANN LIVINGSTON, as Executrix for theEstate of LOUIS R. ADAMS and MARY

LOUISE ADAMS, Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.: 100919/03,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkPT , 2016

:i tHI Attorney for Plaintiffs

Louis R. Adams and Mary Louise AdamsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

KOT^aafi M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,.^2£ yHon. Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DAPR 0 5 2017

NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

IRSECEBVEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

1235-18099

Page 80: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 30(Moulton, P.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SHARRON DEYETTE, as Executrix of the Estate of j Index No. 118139/98RAYMOND DEYETTE :

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER CORP, et al,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Heather Janis Gaw, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300

Charles Ferguson, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

4838-4535-4304.1

File No. 1863.12967

Hon. Peter H. Moulton N

Page 81: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

-X

-X

AS FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT MESSIER ANDBARBARA MESSIER AS SPOUSE,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs,

-against-ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL, INC.,etal.,

Index No.:02-108886

Defendants. — X

WHEREFORE, defendants CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“ Central Hudson” ) and CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. (“ CH Energy” ) hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants Central Hudson and CH Energy be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: //$V /7New York, New York

Brian Early, Esq.EARLY & STRAUSS, L.L.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 986-2233

^Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorney for Defendants335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680

SO ORDERED^X^^Hon. Peter Moulton308947.1

F I L E D05 2017

MEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

i m ** lW \

Page 82: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xROBERT MESSIER and BARBARA MESSIER, Index No.: 108886/2002

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

-v.- AND ORDER

ABB LUMMUS GLOBALS INC., et aL,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, Ndv York2017

/Wf, /£

THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017Attorneys for PlaintiffsRobert Messier, et al.

SO ORDERE]Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for Defendant (REOEUWE©J.H. France Refractories Compatty 2 2 2017

DATE PART 50TJYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

{00047246.}

ApR 05 201/

Page 83: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROBERT S. ZUKOSKI

Plaintiff(s),vs.

A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

^iSEDVIDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No: 108920/2001

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC,named in the complaint as “GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED” hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff s(s’) complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as GouldsPumps LLC without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Goulds Pumps Inc., now known as Goulds Pumps LLC be and the same are herebydismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkftfarrh tti . 2oiffyi

BriaiTEarly, Esc^/The Early Law Firm, LLC360 Lexington Avenue20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: (212) 986-2233

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

— -Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT(S)

SO ORDERED,ziloif'Peter H. Moulton P I L E D

APR 0 5 2017NEW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

Page 84: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

RAYMOND DEYETTEIndex No.118139/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkjWT 2017

Charles RmbsonWEITZ & LUXENBER0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

* 2JAMliS HIMAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS

vAttorn^ys for DefendantTlSH lAJNl REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F f L E DNiW YORK COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK

pfgfwfslI MAR 2 9 2017 1

Page 85: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.JACK KING 106451/00

121987/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2017

CharlesErfz & LUXE!'w y „wnWETTZ & LUXENBER0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, 2 - .

JAMES EDWARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANU!Attorneys for Defendant

JSHM^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCOTlNC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

bn. Peter H. Moulton

IBEOEIVEDMAR 2 9 2017

; PART 50VVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 86: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

JAMES H. CONROYIndex No.123322/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X NOVEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2017

LM®.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

WARDSJAMES

^£0

AHMUTY7DEMERS & McMANUSUtornWs for Defendant

flSHJ^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,r Hon. PeterPeter H. Moulton

pieiiiwio]I MAR 2 9 2017 I.^gSUPREW COURT CIVIL J

Page 87: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK i i Lul l

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

DAVID DOCKERY

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.122175/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X FEBRUARY 2016 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York% ( H 2017

0AIK s.

/Suzdnyvt/ WEITZ &/LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney^ for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

7^ on. Peter H. Moulton

EDWARDSAHMIATY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant

HftjIAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(21 E D

APR 0 5 2017COUNTYCOUNTY CLERK ^ ISCMSWMDI

MAR 2 9 2017„ PART soNYS SUPREME COURT - crva

Page 88: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.ROOSEVELT GREEN 106612/00

121992/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X FEBRUARY 2016 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

lAU ^2017

AJUL AWARDS7K E

j WElfZ &yLUXENBERG, P.C.i Attorneys for Plaintiffs

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

AHMUTY,VDEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant

N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY MOLDINGS,INC h I L e r ^199 Water Street ^ EZ [ jNew York, New York 10038 APft n c

W

(212) 513-7788 ° W?8

. Peter H. MoultonBSSSIB

MAR 2 9 2017PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - crvn

Page 89: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORIELLO,

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.C. & S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No. 104046/2001

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne

M^JfipostPatrick Lynott, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITI77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300

Uv//n /iitg, Esqr- PjfXO C. 6/Tfe\J-MS*Attorney for PlaintiffsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

ipLJf yWOydwayFile No. 1863.25996

SO ORDERED

r Jork, New Yj

APR 05 2(j?;;' 5?8'5i,T. V>^ ,

NEW YORK COUNTY ' ^1- CQUNTY CLCr?K-

S> Hon. Peter H. Moultonp^T

U'/S

r"\\

4833-8794-2724.1

Page 90: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK‘COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 108886/02,

ROBERT MESSIERAND

BARBARA MESSIER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Pecora Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Pecora Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Pecora Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, Nfew Yorkjyav/ .gin

Erin Miter, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPecora CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara MessierTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

SO ORDERED,' Aion. Pel

MAR 2 9 2017Hon. Peter H. Moulton PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

539-9

Page 91: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 108886/02

ROBERT MESSIERAND

BARBARA MESSIER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum Industries, Inc., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum

Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, f/k/a Zum Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: :w York_, 2017

^Attorney for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara MessierTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLC360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10170(212) 986-2233

Alysa KolomsAttorney for DefendantZum Industries, LLCMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

MAR 2 9 2017SO ORDERED,

?ter H. MoultcPART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

535-343

Page 92: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

JAMES M. MARTIN,

Plaintiffs),

-against-AO SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,, et al,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 115708-06

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated/1 3/W/^/ NeW York, New York/ / /

j ylfehris RoUanelli, Esq. '

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 585-5500

20176rneys for Defendant /\po n RCRANECO. n

...599 Lexington AvenueNEW YORK nNew York, NY 10022-6<OBu/Vry n?UNTY(212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, /7)

7*on. Peter H. Moulton fil©E[l¥EOMAR 2 8 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 93: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

i 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK \r f^ECEW!

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-XThis Document Relates to:

JAMES W. MCCANN

MAX. : ! r

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.111360/99100611/03

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X FEBRUARY 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,?' /3 2017

< MCharles kcrqysdn

WEITZ & LUXENBJZRiG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

E&VA^DSmAHMLTCY, DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys u)r DefendantTISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION

> n/k/a TTV MALf YjHOLDINGS,me. Hf h199 Water Street ^pp -New York, New York 10038* U 5 ftp(212) 513-7788 A/£VVy(

/T Hon. Peter H. Moulton BEOEWE©MAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 94: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

JAMES N. WALTERS

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.122199/99113158/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X JUNE 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3"/3 2017

23ChtiHeS Ftr$ .

WEITZ & LUXENBE&0, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, /3 '

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

5WARDSAHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS

^Attorneys for Defendant

^N REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 jfcter StreetNe^orf, New York 10038(212) 513-7^8

^^o^Nry \pARl^MDT - CIVIL

NY5 SUP ECOUKT

Page 95: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

HENRY MCKEOWN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.104245/97, 113280/97111035/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X AUGUST 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkrs -v/3 2017— -

ChfirltZS F&bmOnTWEITZ & LUXENBERU P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,^ZHon. Peter H. Moulton

WARDSAHWTY, ^)EMERS & McMANUSAttorneys for Defendant

ISHM,co., mINC.

REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONn/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788

£4, m-©SOWEDMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 96: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:

JOHN HAUGH

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No.120465/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

X SEPTEMBER 2015 FIFO

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2017

GhatA s RxwsonWEITZ & LUXENBERG^ P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,C '"’ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

JAMES EE WARDSAHMUTY]i DEMERS & McMANUSAttorneys, for DefendantTlSHMAi* REALTY & CONSTRUCTIONCO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,INC.199 Water StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 513-7788 F I L E D

APR » 5 20 p

eliisftegnMAR 2 9 2017

PART 50NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 97: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE BFlNE\$DWKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK I IL. L.U

==========================================XJOHN J. DEGNAN and SHEILA DEGN#IS,- S Mfl Index No. 104409-03

- against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to SARCO COMPANY, et al.,

PlaintBfiDNTYCLERK^SOFFI-

SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

Defendants.==========================================X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and assuccessor to Sarco Company (hereinafter “ SPIRAX SARCO” ) herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,

SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Pi / ~CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantSPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

Dated: White Plains, New York, 2017

JUSTIN SIEBEL, ESQ.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

So Ordered:

IRECEIMEOMAP, $ 9 “ 01/

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 98: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

X:/FBW!i676t /leeal/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XWAYNE PAUL, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDPlaintiff(s), ORDER

- against - Index No.: 114934/07

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550

SO ORDERED, /7^Hon. Peter Moulton

William Cooney, Es^TAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Woks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th Flo&New York, New York 1&06(212) 313-3600 -3. g 81

mo ;x>. r^ rn» o-n

o

RECEIVEDMAR 3 « 2017

PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 99: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

X:/FBWS5891/eeal/November2012SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

EDWARD RICH,X

PlaintifF(s),

- against -

FILEDAPR - 5 20( 1

NOJUDGMENT ftfOTiON ANDORDER

Index No.: 106352/05

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. INC., et al.

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

&Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550

William Cooney, EsqTAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,Hon. PetePeter Moulton

BE©e^yMAR 3 0 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT CIVILIL

Page 100: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

T

X:CLB/60225/DISMISSALS/NQSJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XSONIA G. DALTON, as Executrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYEUGENE S. DALTON, JUDGMENT MOTION AND

Plaintiffs), ORDER

- against - Index No.: 110362/08 & 106052/99

A.C.&S. INC., et al;

Defendants.x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice ando

without costs.

Ehan Alvaiadu, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

-5 25 —p -x) rm on rn70 'LO & ap-n

Shav tt5 sqAttomeysTor CLEAVER-BROOKS INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,/fiorf Peter Moulton

IBEOEWSBMAR 3 0 2017

PART 50i tiyg SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 101: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

X:CLB/56773.Aesai/NOSJM FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWA^COUNTY OF NEW YORK ~ b

-cowifYetfRrs’OPFICEWFU/ Vnn^1NEW YORK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

DONALD SKELTON, JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),

- against - Index No.: 103009/08

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALLA.S. Part 50

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC• hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, /TZt-/Irkm. Peter Moulton

Page 102: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CLB55510/legal/nosjm/December 2011 ISUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 0COUNTY OF NEW YORK

MS.-S— MIXDONALD M. TAYLOR,

•NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

•against- Index No.: 103870/02

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendant(s),X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorneys for DefendantWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED.fon. Peter Moulton

Page 103: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

Index No. 119152-03

NYCAL

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against

defendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

KATHI LIOZZO, for the Estate ofBLANCHE MCDONALD,

Plaintiffs,v.

AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., et al.Defendants.

%

A//

*%"S

ce

Brian Early, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs360 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017

nnis E>Vegfl7 tsq. UDennisITanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATIONOne Newark Center,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

SO ORDERED, .^ * Unn DQ+CHon. Peter H. Moulton MM* S*1

83250869Vl

Page 104: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

^^ v%%'X

KATHI LIOZZO, for the Estate of Index No. 119152-03BLANCHE MCDONALD,

Plaintiffs, NYCAL

v.AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., et al..

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse

Electric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs7

complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New York, New York

Brian Early, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs360 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10017

SO ORDERED,/ 'Hon. Peter H.Moulton

C

Dennis ITanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATIONOne Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

liSfwi®I m s1ml

83250869v1

Page 105: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES HARVEY

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 102424/93

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

% ^%J- yf>

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

i

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: N^w/Yprk, N|ew York

, 2017rk^Npw ^

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffJames HarveyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,.£ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

1122-13366

RECEIVEDMAR 2 8 2017

PART $0NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIl

Page 106: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES HARVEY

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) co.Index No.: 102424/93

%\<<$'

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY v <%,

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ^WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ne^y YfokJ^w York„, 2017

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsJames HarveyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, .

icole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

IS Cl !DMAR 2 2 2017

1235-12824

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 107: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ESTATE OF JOHN A. JADUSAND

JOSEPHINE JADUS, INDIVIDUALLY

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 109428/98

"/•

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Ytjrk, Njbw York3/9M - 2017

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of John A. Jadus and Josephine Jadus,IndividuallyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

DECEIVEDMAR 82 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

324*2605

Page 108: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARIO MAIORIELLOAND

SANTA MAIORIELLO

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 119382/00, 104046/01

W v<5'oX%rO

%NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter Sc Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter Sc Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New ^jork, New York

3ld3s 2°17

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario Maioriello and Santa MaiorielloWEITZ SC LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

NicoleP, Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter Sc Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY SC KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, .z Hon. Peter H. Moulton

1122-24573

RECEIVEDMAR 22 2017

PART 50MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 109: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

This Document Relates to:

COUNTY OF NEW YORKSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARIO MAIORIELLOAND

SANTA MAIORIELLO

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 119382/00,

<0

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N^w Ylork, Ne^ York6 / .2017

Adam S, Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMario Maioriello and Santa MaiorielloWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicole P. Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

1235-24835

Page 110: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

A

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

EDWARD BENDERSKI,

Plaintiff,

-X

-X

- against -

A.C. and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary Judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No

Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF

signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.

Dated: 3"S 2017New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

Hon. Peter H. Moulton MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 111: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

A

Index No.: 122185/99In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

RALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P.ROBINSON As Co-Executors for the Estate ofJOSEPH L. MINERVINO,

- against -

A.C & S. INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs),

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: "3^8"/7 .-2016New York, New York

Matthew Maclnliye, r&yCInCfri S'

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. fe/ AlSDnAttorneys for Plaintiff J700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, —‘ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

I

Michael }( Testa, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

zm

-<o

-<omgCOo

s

“Y|i Fcn m

I'-Oo o

BECEWEE)

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 112: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 125799/99In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SANDRA W. CAPOGNA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ARMOND J.CAPOGNA,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONPlaintiff(s),

against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), etal.,

I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.

Dated: 3' 8"H ,20t6New York, New York s

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

s

SO ORDERED, ^^ non. Peter H. Moulton

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

FILED

Page 113: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 116099/03

EDWARD BOLES, as Proposed Executor for theEstate of EUGENE E. BOLES,

Plaintiff,

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for allpurposes of this motion.

Dated: 3/ (New York, New York

^2017

Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

8c:

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

^m-<73

o-nom

70

cn&

aHOTL Peter H. Moulton

BEOEUWEOMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

FILED

Page 114: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, andCHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor forthe Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM,

Plaintiffs),

-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al.,

Defendants.

X

Ays-

^V

Index Nos.: 109036/200#>V

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York.New York

3k.New Yo

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: .anne Ratcliffe, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

& Gaurav Talwar, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

BE EWEDMAR 2 2 2017

fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. ti 'i ’Vr e;r)

L - CIVIL

Page 115: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for :the Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM, and :CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executor for :the Estate of LOIS E.NUSBAUM, :

Plaintiffs), :

-against- :

A.C. and S., INC. et al., :

Defendants. :X

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 109036/2000

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkV i l j i jWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By:Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SS

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLjKo % --Attorneys for Defendant The Gdticfyear Tire <£Rubber Cojnpany , ^

m

By: .M O

^Gaurav Talwar, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

om

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: — — —^ fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

IBi EDVEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 116: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SHARON W, RODGERS, as ADMINISTRATRIXand CAROL WEGENER as ADMINISTRATRIXfor the Estate of CHARLES M. WEGENER,

X

X

Plaintiffs),

-against-

NYCAL co,4^cO. 6

*Index Nos.: 121595/1998

4A \JS \

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

ce

A.C. and S., INC. et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

^ Adam Dreklser, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:^ fJon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

iioiavEDlMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 117: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARIE T. MAGUIRE, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS K. MAGUIRE, and MARIE T. MAGUIRE,Individually

NYCAL % "3I.A.S. Part 50 C(Moulton, P.) ^Index No: 122013/199^^.NO OPPOSITIONJUDGMENT MOTION ArffeORDER Cv

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkV , 2017

Charles M. Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. 1

DARGER, Esq.1TE YA' [TZ & BLAU, LLP

Attorneys for CertainTeedlCorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,/ Msya. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

1BE(0EI!VEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART SONYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 118: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARIE T. MAGUIRE, as Executrix for the Estate ofTHOMAS K. MAGUIRE, and MARIE T. MAGUIRE,Individually

% ^NYCAL %, ^I A S. Part 50 +(Moulton, P.)Index No: 122013/1998 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMM^%JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER '

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

ed^e^YDated<u£'Tew^York, New York

, 2017

WEITZ & LUXENBERG7T.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavit;DARGER ERR^ *sq.

TE YAVITZAttorneys for Dana Companies,116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

BLAU, LLP,LC

SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HiCEIMiDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 119: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XLAWRENCE LEBROCQ AND MARIE LEBROCQ,HIS WIFE,

Index No.: 105719/2006

Plaintiffs, SECONDNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

against-

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,SPIRAX SARCO, INC., individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, INC., individually and assuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc., (hereinafter “ SPIRAX SARCO” ) hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,

SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs. 0

Qg^prl- \A/hita Dloinc MatA/ Vnrl ^

KevWilentz Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FINew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

Hodges Walsh & Messemer. ®LPAttorneys for Defendant £SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc.55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Tel: 914-385-6000

J.S.C.

MAR 3 0 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 120: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et at.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

1. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC

2. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.

3. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): AMERICAN HARDWARE AND PAINT CO., INC.

4. Anthony J. Caruso, Esq.Caruso Smith Edell Picini, PC60 Route 46 EastFairfield, NJ 07004Phone: 973-667-6000Fax: 973-667-1200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ASBEKA INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, INC.

5. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 1

Page 121: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

6. Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th Street - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5378Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC.

7. Jennifer Darger, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th StreetNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5360Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BEAZER EAST INC.

8. John M. Guerriero, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7467Fax: 2012-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BW/IP, INC.

9. Andrew W. Dean, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212.651.7500Fax: 212.651.7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): BW/IP, INC.

10. Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone:973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CBS CORPORATION

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 2

Page 122: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

11. Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq.Thompson Hine LLP335 Madison Avenue - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10017-4611Phone: 212-908-3957Fax: 212-344-6101Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CENTRAL HUDSON GAS 8i ELECTRIC CORPORATION

12. Stuart M. Goldstein, Esq.Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey, PLLCWillow Ridge Executive Office Park750 Route 73 South - Suite 202BMarlton, NJ 08053Phone: 856-810-7302Fax: 856-810-8861Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY

13. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

14. Kevin J. O’Toole, Esq.O'Toole, Fernandez, Weiner & Van Lieu, LLC14 Village Park RoadCedar Grove, NJ 07009Phone: 973-239-5700Fax: 973-239-3400Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION

15. Suzanne M. Halbardier, Esq.Barry McTiernan & Moore LLC2 Rector Street - 14th FloorNew York, NY 10006Phone: 212-313-3600Fax: 212-608-8901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CLEAVER-BROOKS INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002 }Page | 3

Page 123: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

16. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L Gates, LLP599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022Phone: 212-536-3900Fax: 212-536-3901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CRANE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

17. Lissa Gipson, Esq.Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLPOne Liberty Plaza, 35th FloorNew York, NY 10006-1404Phone: (212) 412-9500Fax: (212) 964-9200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.

18. Grant A. Shehigian, Esq.Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLPOne Liberty Plaza - 35th FloorNew York, NY 10006-1404Phone: 212.412.9500Fax: 212.964.9200Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CROWN, CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.

19. Christian H. Gannon, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7409Fax: 212-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION

20. John J. Delany, III, Esq.Delany McBride, P.C.36 Euclid StreetWoodbury, NJ 08096Phone: 856.202.8100Fax: 856.384.5957Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): DUCTMATE INDUSTRIES, INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 4

Page 124: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

21. Joel R. Clark, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): DURO DYNE CORPORATION

22. Gary Van Lieu, Esq.O'Toole, Fernandez, Weiner 8t Van Lieu, LLC14 Village Park RoadCedar Grove, NJ 07009Phone: 973-239-5700Fax: 973-239-3400Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EStB MILL SUPPLY CO.

23. Nancy McDonald, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenueP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EDWARD VOGT VALVE COMPANY

24. Robert P. McManus, Esq.Ahmuty, Demers & McManus200 I.U. Willets RoadAlbetson, NY 11507Phone: 516.535.2440Fax: 516.294.5387Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): EX-FM, INC.

25. Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone: 973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 5

Page 125: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16; 2017

26. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

27. Denise D. Harris, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenueP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962-2075Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FLOWSERVE US INC.

28. Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLP1085 Raymond Boulevard - 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Phone: 973-242-0002Fax: 973-242-8099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FOSTER WHEELER, LLC

29. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): FURINO & SONS, INC.

30. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGE A. FULLER COMPANY

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 6

Page 126: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

31. Scott R. Emery, Esq.Lynch Daskal Emery LLP137 West 25th Street - 5th FloorNew York, NY 10001Phone: 212-302-2400Fax: 212-302-2210Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

32. Lawrence Lee, Esq.Lynch Daskal Emery LLP137 West 25th Street - 5th FloorNew York, NY 10001Phone: 212-302-2400Fax: 212-302-2210Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

33. Christian J. Soller, Esq.Hodgson Russ LLP677 Broadway - Suite 301Albany, NY 12207Phone: 518.465.2333Fax: 518.465.1567Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

34. Kristine M. Meeks, ParalegalGeorgia-Pacific LLC133 Peachtree Street NE, 39th FloorAtlanta, GA 30303Phone: 404-652-4526Fax: 404-487-4151Email: * *[email protected] for Defendant(s): GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

35. Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.McGivney 8t Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 7

Page 127: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

36. Edward Fogarty, Esq.White & McSpedon875 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10001Phone: (212) 564-6633Fax: (212) 564-9799Attorneys for Defendant(s): GREENE, TWEED & COMPANY, INC.

37. Kevin C. Tierney, Esq.Tierney Law Offices1125 Land Title Building100 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19110-1029Phone: 215-790-2400Fax: 215-790-2409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): GUYON GENERAL PIPING, INC.

38. Peter Stasz, Esq.H.B. Smith Company61 Union Street - Suite 2Westfield, MA 01085-2476Phone: (413) 568-3148Fax: (413) 568-0525Attorneys for Defendant(s): H.B. SMITH COMPANY, INC., THE

39. Marc S. Gaffrey, Esq.Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas40 Paterson StreetP.O. Box 480New Brunswick, NJ 08903Phone: 732-545-4717Fax: 732-545-4579Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): HUDSON IRON AND METAL COMPANY

40. Joseph G. Colao, Esq.Leader & Berkon, LLP630 Third Avenue, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10017Phone: 212-486-2400Fax: 212-486-3099Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): IMO INDUSTRIES INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 8

Page 128: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

41. Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: 212-309-6246Fax: 212-309-6001Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ITT LLC

42. Donald E. WardSpecial Claims Services, Inc.809 Coshocton Avenue, Suite 1Mount Vernon, OH 43050-1931Phone: (740) 397-6700Fax: (740) 397-6701Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO., INC.

43. David P. Schaffer, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway - Suite 600New York, NY 10038Phone: 212-791-0285Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO., INC.

44. James Edwards, Esq.Ahmuty, Demers & McManus200 I.U. Willets RoadAlbertson, NY 11507Phone: (516) 294-5433Fax: (516) 294-5387Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): JOHANSEN COMPANY, THE

45. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney 8i Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): JOHN W. WALLACE & CO.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 9

Page 129: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

46. Linda Dunne, Esq.Nowell Amoroso Klein Bierman, P.A.155 Polifly RoadHackensack, NJ 07601Phone: 201-343-5001Fax: 201-343-5181Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KING INSULATION COMPANY, INC.

47. Joel R. Clark, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KING INSULATION COMPANY, INC.

48. Kevin E. Hoffman, Esq.McGivney 8i Kluger, P.C.555 Route One South - Suite 140Iselin, NJ 08830Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): KOENIG INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC.

49. Jeffrey S. Kluger, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973-822-1110Fax: 973-822-1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MADSEN & HOWELL, INC.

50. Mark Turner, Esq.Tierney Law Offices1125 Land Title Building100 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19110-01029Phone: 215-790-2400Fax: 215-790-2409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MAJOR INCORPORATED

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 10

Page 130: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

51. John Fanning, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLP44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Phone: 212-701-4148Fax: 212-742-2156Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.

52. Kevin E. Hoffman, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.555 Route One South - Suite 140Iselin, NJ 08830Phone: 973.822.1110Fax: 973.822.1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MARSAM VALVES & FITTINGS CORPORATION

53. Joseph P. LaSala, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney 8i Carpenter LLP1300 Mount Kemble RoadP.O. Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962-2075Phone: 973-993-8100Fax: 973-425-0161Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): MUNACO SEALING SOLUTIONS, INC.

54. Andrew Sapon, Esq.Litchfield Cavo LLP420 Lexington Avenue - Suite 2104New York, NY 10170Phone: 212-792-9761Fax: 212-434-0105Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): O’CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC.

55. Suzanne M. Halbardier, Esq.Barry McTiernan & Moore LLC2 Rector Street - 14th FloorNew York, NY 10006Phone: 212-313-3600Fax: 212-608-8901Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): OLYMPIC GLOVE AND SAFETY CO., INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 11

Page 131: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

56. Andrew J. Czerepak, Esq.Richard W. Babinecz Law Offices4 Irving PlaceBorough of ManhattanNew York, NY 10003-3598Phone: (212) 460-3285Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC

57. Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 East 27th Street - 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016Phone: 212-452-5378Fax: 212-452-5301Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): PFAUDLER UNITED STATES INC.

58. Robert C. Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10038Phone: (212) 791-0285Fax: (212) 791-0286Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): PULMOSAN SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

59. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): RCH NEWCO II, LLC

60. Robert F. Ball, Esq.Weiner Lesniak, LLP629 Parsippany RoadParsippany, NJ 07054Phone: 973-602-3917Fax: 973-403-0010Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): RED-WHITE VALVE CORP.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 12

Page 132: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

61. Russell Pepe, Esq.Harwood Lloyd, LLC130 Main StreetHackensack, NJ 07601Phone: 201-487-1080Fax: 201-487-4758Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SCHIAVONE-BONOMO CORPORATION

62. George S. Hodges, Esq.Hodges, Walsh, Messemer 8t Moroknek, LLP55 Church Street - Suite 211White Plains, NY 10601Phone: 914-385-6000Fax: 914-385-6060Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SPiRAX SARCO, INC.

63. Jeffrey S. Kluger, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.23 Vreeland Road - Suite 220Florham Park, NJ 07932Phone: 973-822-1110Fax: 973-822-1116Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): SVI CORPORATION

64. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TISHMAN LIQUIDATING CORP.

65. Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.Pascarella DiVita, PLLC2137 Route 35 - Suite 290Holmdel, NJ 07733Phone: 732-837-9019Fax: 732-203-2380Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TRANE US, INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 13

Page 133: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

66. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TREADWELL CORPORATION

67. John J. Kot, Esq.Waters, McPherson, McNeill, P.C.300 Lighting WayP.O. Box 1560Secaucus, NJ 07096-1560Phone: 201-330-7454Fax: 201-863-2866Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

68. Anthony J. Marino, Esq.Garrity, Graham, Murphy, Garofalo & Flinn72 Eagle Rock Avenue - Suite 350PO Box 438East Hanover, NJ 07936-3100Phone: 973-509-7500Fax: 973-509-0414Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): UNITED CONVEYOR CORP.

69. Stephen S. Davie, Esq.Mackenzie Hughes LLP440 South Warren Street - Suite 400Syracuse, NY 13202-2601Phone: 315-474-7571Fax: 315-474-6409Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION

70. Edward p. Abbot, Esq.Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP600 Lexington Avenue - 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022Phone: 212.897.9655Fax: 646.589.8700Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): VIKING PUMP INC.

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 14

Page 134: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

\ 4-I

CASE: LEBROCQ V. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , et al.INDEX NO.: 105719/2006

SERVICE LISTMARCH 16, 2017

71. Steven R. Rosenblatt, Esq.Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.850 Third Avenue - Suite 1100New York, NY 10022Phone: 212-651-7424Fax: 212-651-7499Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): WEIL-McLAIN

72. William F. Mueller, Esq.Clemente Mueller, P.A.218 Ridgedale AvenueCedar Knolls, NJ 07927Phone: 973-455-8008Fax: 973-455-8118Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY, THE

73. Kerryann Cook, Esq.McGivney & Kluger, P.C.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004Phone: 212-509-3456Fax: 212-509-4420Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ZURN INDUSTRIES OF DELAWARE, LLC

74. Diane H. Miller, Esq.Littleton Joyce Ughetta Park 8t Kelly LLP4 Manhattanville Road - Suite 202Purchase, NY 10577Phone: 914.417.3400Fax: 914.417.3401Email: [email protected] for Defendant(s): ZY-TECH GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

UNKNOWN COUNSELASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY CO., INC.BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD.CLAYBURN CONSTRUCTION CORP.ELIZABETH PLUMBING & HEATINGSUPPLY CO., INC.INDUSTRIAL RUBBER COMPANYJOULE, INC.

L&H PLUMBING & HEATING SUPPLIES, INC.LUNKENHEIMER CORPORATION, THENEW JERSEY BOILER REPAIR COMPANYNORTH CAROLINA ENTERPRISES CO., INC.SCHUTTE and KOERTING, INC.STERLING PLASTICS AND RUBBERPRODUCTS, INC

#9044949.1(145537.002)Page | 15

Page 135: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK )

COUNTY OF WESTCHESTERSS.:)

)

YELENA STIFEYEVA being duly sworn, deposes and says:

I am employed by the law firm of HODGES WALSH & MESSEMER, LLP,

counsel for Defendant in the above action and I am over the age of 18 years and I am not

a party to this action. On March 21, 2017, 1 served a true copy of the annexed Second No

Opposition Summary Judgment Motion in the following manner: by mailing same in a

sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a post office or official depository of

the U.S. Postal Service within the State of New York addressed to the last known address

of all attorneys in this action as indicated below:

TO: Wilentz Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William St., 26th FINew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

Defense Counsel of Record (via e-mail corresondence)

All parties of record in the attached Service List have been notified of the service of theNo Opposition Summary Judgment Motion on plaintiffs counsel.

Yelena Stifeyeva

Sworn to before me this91st 9017

Page 136: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WILLIAM WEIGOLD SR.AND

DOROTHY WEIGOLD

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 121090/02, 113276/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.,with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Dap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc., be and the same are hei§>y dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Y^rk, Ne|v York

<3 / . 2017

'AAdam S. Dreksler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWilliam Weigold Sr. and Dorothy WeigoldWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

§

mo §=££ *-< =*> A,Opt; cn

O

Z!sson A. Null, Esq.

Attorney for DefendantDap, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED;

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

EECMAR 2 2 1017

REMECOURT - CWU-NYSSUP

04-0719

FILED

Page 137: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for the Estateof THOMAS J.MURRAY, and PATRICIAMURRAY, Individually,

Plaintiffs),

-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al.,

X

X

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 119472-01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorktsfiijiTWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By:S e Ratcliffe, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &

.Rubber Company

By: _S^) ^Dan Gagnardi, Esq.

<2New York, New York 10001 4<? ^137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor

(212) 302-2400 # ££

£o

SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

G?E(SII1WEDMAR 2 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 138: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

Index No.: 119472-01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for the Estateof THOMAS J. MURRAY, and PATRICIAMURRAY, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.C. and S., INC. et al,,

Defendants.

complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New Yojk, Fjfew YorkYork, NewmhWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

i A/uBy!anne Ratcliffe, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: .

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

£- fIt j*

# %/<•

Pi

SO ORDERED:/ 7 T THon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

IRECEOWEDMAR 22 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 139: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JEANNETTE M.MICHAEL,as Administratrix forthe Estate of GERMANO A.KUHN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 108950/2001

%

'ceNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3~ X , 2017

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. 3

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A^Yavitz, Esq. 1DARGER ERRANTE MAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carwde Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, STA.

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

pARrn?tRT - CIVIL

Page 140: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

f

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.AS. Part 50Index No: 104096-99This Document Relates to:

ANTHONY SABIN and CAROL SABINNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, sued herein as “ Dana Corporation” ,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Companies,

LLC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkZjlI . 2017

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway

DARGEILERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Judith A. Jfayftz, Esq.DARGERERRANTE

New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,''fton. Peter H. Moulton

Page 141: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 104096-99This Document Relates to:

ANTHONY SABIN and CAROL SABINNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkb f 11 , 2017

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavyfz, >Esq.DARGER ER^NTE YAVffTZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Qorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FlobrNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,^Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 142: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 102153

GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New w York2017

Susan Barlow, EsqSusan Barlow, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavit / Esq.DARGER ELRJUNTE YAY TZ & BLAttorneys for Dana Compai lies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Yavit/; Esq.ELRRANTE YAY TZ & BLAU, LLP

SO ORDERED,6 f^on. Peter H. Moulton

MAR 2 2 Z017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Page 143: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

A

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50Index No: 102153/2003This Document Relates to:

GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Ne 1 'T w York2017

smanBariowTEs^WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

JJudith A. Y^ W Esq. 7DARGER EJKRANTE YAVETZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloVorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, '

lion. Peter H. Moulton

MAR 2 2 2017PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 144: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

%>r "S

Index No.: 118531/02ROBERT J.SHANSTROM andRITA M.SHANSTROM NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC fk/a Burnham Corporation, improperly named

as successor to Burnham Corporation (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3-8 2017

Charles Ferguson, EsqNJWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

-f®DEliWEDMAR 23 2017

PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

3265190