food for thought: an analysis of school breakfast implementation models prepared by matt kropke for...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast
implementation models
Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska
UAA Masters in Public Administration
Capstone PresentationApril 15, 2011
1
![Page 2: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research Question
How can schools maximize the results of a breakfast program based on nutrition research findings, recent policy changes and lessons learned from pilot programs around the nation?
2
![Page 3: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The The ProblemProblem 34,326 Alaska children receiving 34,326 Alaska children receiving
free or reduced lunch in 2010 free or reduced lunch in 2010
23,119 Alaska children living in 23,119 Alaska children living in povertypoverty
14,168 Alaska children receiving 14,168 Alaska children receiving free or reduced breakfastfree or reduced breakfast
Leaving 9,000 to 20,000 at risk of Leaving 9,000 to 20,000 at risk of hungerhunger
3
![Page 4: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“…“…under nutrition -even in its “milder” under nutrition -even in its “milder” forms- during any periods of childhood forms- during any periods of childhood can have detrimental effects on the can have detrimental effects on the cognitive development of children and cognitive development of children and their later productivity as adults.” their later productivity as adults.”
(Tufts University School of Nutrition and Science (Tufts University School of Nutrition and Science Policy, 1995)Policy, 1995)
Childhood Childhood Hunger Hunger
4
![Page 5: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Federal Programs
School lunch program official and School lunch program official and permanent in 1946permanent in 1946
The School Breakfast Program was The School Breakfast Program was established in 1966. established in 1966.
In 2010 the USDA spent over $2.4 In 2010 the USDA spent over $2.4 Billion on the School Breakfast Billion on the School Breakfast Program.Program.
5
![Page 6: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Pilot Programs
Minnesota Fast Break to Learning New York State Academics &
Breakfast Connection Maryland Meals for Achievement
Program
6
![Page 7: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Maryland Meals for Achievement
6 schools in 1998 to 196 schools in 2010
85% drop in tardiness
suspensions decreased 1.6 days per month
5% increase in students scoring satisfactorily or above on the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program
Non MMFA schools saw a slight decline
7
![Page 8: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Additional Findings
Fast break: provide schools with a couple implementation models
ABC: increase in funds (due to the increase in the meals served) was enough to sustain the program
8
![Page 9: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Cost Considerations Each meal regardless of service model cost
the same.
As meal counts increase, expenses and revenues increase.
Students qualifying for free or reduced meals will dictate total reimbursement.
Alaska reimbursement rate for qualifying free breakfast is $2.36 2010-2011.
$2 M gain for state if participation rose to 60%
9
![Page 10: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Service Options
Break after 1Break after 1stst period period
Breakfast in the classroomBreakfast in the classroom
Cafeteria open early Cafeteria open early (Traditional)(Traditional)
Grab and goGrab and go
10
![Page 11: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CriteriaCriteria
Student Participation in the meal program.
Non disruption of class learning time.
Lack of stigmatism attached to the service model
11
![Page 12: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Scoring
Service Models are scored from 1 to 3 based on each criteria. For example, in order to score a 3, Pilot schools must have demonstrated following results:
•Program Participation: Above 70% of students eat on average
•Class Disruption: No time is taken from classes for food service
•Stigmatism: All students eat together regardless of income
12
![Page 13: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Non Weighted Results Participation Disruption Stigmatism
(lack of) Score
Breakfast In the Classroom
3 2 3 8
Break after 1st period 3 1 3 7
Grab and Go (Hallway) 2 2 2 6
Cafeteria open early 1 3 1 5
13
![Page 14: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Teachers Students Hunger Advocates
Total
Score
Breakfast In the Classroom
10 11 11 32
Break after 1st Period 8 10 10 28
Grab and Go (Hallway) 8 8 8 24
Cafeteria Open Early 8 6 6 20
Weighted Results
14
![Page 15: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Review
Thousands of kids are arriving to school hungry every day in Alaska.
Hungry kids have difficulty learning
Breakfast in the classroom is a high scoring solution.
15
![Page 16: Food for Thought: An analysis of school breakfast implementation models Prepared by Matt Kropke for the Food Bank of Alaska UAA Masters in Public Administration](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56649f385503460f94c54138/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Thank You! Are there any questions?
16