Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1

FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL

UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility

BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Main Office & Conference Center Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105

UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV

ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame

Gross Square Footage: 8,290 Number of stories above grade: 2 Number of basement stories below grade: 0

Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A

SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM

ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef

Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2

CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT

I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):

a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No

b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No

Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):

1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.

2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.

3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.

the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1

FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL

UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility

BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Buenos Ayres Room Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105

UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV

ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame

Gross Square Footage: Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0

Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A

SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM

ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef

Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2

CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT

I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):

a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No

b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No

Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):

1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.

2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.

3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.

the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1

FORM 1

CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL UC-Designed & Constructed Facility Campus-Acquired or Leased Facility

BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Santa Fe Room Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105 UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): V ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type:

a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame b. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame

Gross Square Footage: 1,218 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0 Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef

Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2

CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT

I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):

a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No

b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No

Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):

1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.

2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.

3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.

the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1

FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL

UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility

BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Family Pool Restrooms Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105

UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV

ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame

Gross Square Footage: 1,044 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0

Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A

SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM

ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef

Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2

CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT

I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):

a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No

b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No

Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):

1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.

2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.

3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.

the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1

FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL

UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility

BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Park Pool Locker Rooms Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105

UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV

ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame

Gross Square Footage: 4,980 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0

Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A

SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM

ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef

Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019

This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2

CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT

I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):

a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No

b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No

Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):

1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.

2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.

3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.

the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.

1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.

Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•••

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

••••

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

••

•

••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• A-1

ON

TOC

ON

FIR

M H

D A

NC

HO

RH

AS B

EEN

PR

OVI

DED

MIN

IMU

M P

ER F

LOO

R.

ERIF

Y H

OLD

-DO

WN

ON

NEC

TIO

N A

T W

ALL

ND

S. 2

LO

CAT

ION

SN

IMU

MVE

RIF

Y AN

CH

OR

CO

NN

ECTI

ON

TO

CO

NC

RET

E W

ALL

PIER

S 2

LO

CAT

ION

SM

INIM

UM

VER

IFY

HO

LD-D

OW

NC

ON

NEC

TIO

N A

T W

ALL

END

S. 2

LO

CAT

ION

SM

INIM

UM

VER

IFYC

ON

NEC

TIO

NBE

TWEE

N B

UIL

DIN

G D

AND

E

FY C

ON

NEC

TIO

NEE

N B

UIL

DIN

G D

VER

IFY

HO

LD-D

OFO

UN

DAI

TON

CO

FOU

ND

ATIO

N

• A-2

•

•