form no. 4 order sheet armed forces …aftlko.up.nic.in › c1 daily order › c1 order -2019 › c1...

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

M.A.No. 746 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. Nil of 2019

Ex Rect Chandrabhan Singh Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant

Versus

Union of India & others Respondents

By Legal Practitioner for Respondents

Notes of the Registry

Orders of the Tribunal

12.09.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Chairperson Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)

Memo of appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf

of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for the

respondents when the case is listed next.

Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 746 of 2019

Through the instant application, the applicant is seeking for condoning the

delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to reinstate him in

service.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents. Service is thus complete.

For the reasons carved out in the application for condonation of delay and

there is no serious objection by the respondents, the delay in filing the Original

Application is hereby condoned.

Misc. Application stands disposed of accordingly.

Let the Original Application be allotted its regular number today itself, which

stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld.

Counsel for the respondents.

Service is thus complete.

Counter Affidavit be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the Ld.

Counsel for the applicant, who may file Rejoinder Affidavit within next two weeks.

List the case on 20.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange of

pleadings.

(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh) Member (A) Chairperson SB

Form No. 4




Smt Krishna Devi W/o Ex Sep (Late) Jagdish Prakash Sharma Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate on behalf of the

respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for

the respondents when the case is listed next.

Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

M.A. No. 747 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant family

pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Service is thus complete.






stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents for ser 1 to 4 only.


Issue notice to respondent No. 5 & 6.



List again on 20.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange of

pleadings.


Form No. 4



M.A.No. 748 of 2019 Inre O.A.(A) No. Nil of 2019

Ex Sep Kamala Shankar Pal Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant

Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri R.C. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the

respondents is taken on record.

Present: Shri R Chandra, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri R.C.

Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

This Original Application (Appeal) has been filed by the appellant for

quashing the order dated 07.11.2018 passed by the respondent (General Officer

Commanding In Chief, Southern Command) on the petition dated 20.08.2016

moved by the appellant wherein he has prayed to set aside the punishment

awarded by SCM and reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits.

The appellant was enrolled in the Army on 27.11.1990 and was dismissed

from service by the SCM on 05.09.1995.

This original application has been filed by the appellant after a delay of

more than 3 months from the date of order of rejection of the petition, moved by

the appellant. Since the petitioner has slept over his right for more than 20 years

from the date of dismissal and no plausible explanation has been carved out by

the appellant in his application for condonation of delay for the huge delay; no

relief can be granted to the appellant .

On behalf of the respondents facts are admitted. However, it is pleaded

that the entire record of the applicant has been weeded out after expiry of period of

retention. Since the appellant was dismissed from service in the year 1995,

therefore all the documents were destroyed after the period of retention.

Accordingly, application for condonation of delay (M.A. No. 748 of 2019 is

hereby dismissed.

Since the application of condonation of delay is dismissed, the Original

Application (Appeal) is also dismissed.


Form No. 4




Ex Sep Raj Narayan Singh Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate on behalf



Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and

Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 749 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant disability

pension.

Learned counsel for the respondents to file objection on the application for

condonation of delay within four weeks and replication, if any, may be filed by

learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks.

List again on 07.11.2019, the next date when the bench is available.


Form No. 4




Ex Sep Sant Ram Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate on behalf of

the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for the


Present: Shri R Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 751 of 2019



pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the


Learned counsel for the respondents to file objection on the application for

condonation of delay as well as on main O.A. within four weeks and replication, if

any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks.

List the case on 07.11.2019, before the Registrar Court.


Form No. 4




Smt Sughar Shree (W/o Pnr (Late) Vrij Kishore) Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the

respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for the


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 756 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant family

pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the


Since the instant matter is at initial stage, reply to the misc. Application for

condonation of delay and short reply to the main original application be filed by the

respondents within four weeks.

Replication, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within

two weeks, thereafter.

We will appreciate if the respondents are in position to extract the relevant

record(s) concerning the husband of the applicant (since deceased) and the same

be made available to the Tribunal for its perusal.


pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Sub Om Prakash Yadav Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Ms. Amrita Chakraborty , Advocate on behalf

of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Ld. Counsel for the


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 757 of 2019



pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav Muneshwar Singh Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of the



Present: Shri Rahul Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 759 of 2019



pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.





pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Ram Ji Prashad & another Applicants

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants

Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Dr. Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the



Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura, learned counsel for the applicants and Dr.

Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 771 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant pension of the

rank of Naib Subedar.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.





pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Kashi Ram Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on

behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel

for the respondents when the case is listed next.

Present: None for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel

for the respondents.

M.A. No. 787 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant pension of the


Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the


Since, none is present on behalf of the applicant, list this case on

18.10.2019 for orders.


Form No. 4




Nk (TS) Pradeep Kumar Sharma Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on



Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 792 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to quash his discharge

order.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents. Service is thus complete.






stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Shyam Narain Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf



Present: Shri VP Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun

Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 793 of 2019


delay in filing the Original Application whereby he is seeking to grant pension of


Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld.



Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the Ld.



pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Man Bahadur Rai Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate on behalf



Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 797 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Vidhata Prasad Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the



Present: Shri Anand Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit

Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 798 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.





pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Neboo Lal Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate on



Present: Shri Anand Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 799 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Awadhesh Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate on





M.A. No. 800 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Ram Naresh Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf




Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 801 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Ram Vilas Dixit Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Shakti Vikram Srivastava, Advocate on




Shakti Vikram Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 802 of 2019




Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Shakti Vikram Srivastava, Ld. Counsel

for the respondents. Service is thus complete.






stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Shakti Vikram Srivastava, Ld.






pleadings.


Form No. 4




Ex Sub Sushil Kumar Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri R.C. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the



Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 803 of 2019



pension.

Issue notice.

Notice has been accepted by Shri Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the







stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.


Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the Ld.



pleadings.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

O.A.No. 424 of 2019

Sep (NA) Gaurav Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Chairperson Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)

Memo of appearance fi led by Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate

on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld.

Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

Present: Col AK Srivastava (Retd) & Shri Dharam Raj Singh, learned

counsel for the applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.

Confronted with the issue of jurisdiction to file the instant O.A. at

Armed Forces Tribunal, R.B., Lucknow, learned counsel for the applicant

states that he may be given some time to make a motion under Rule 6 of the

Armed Forces Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2008 for the said purpose.

May do so.

Subject to filing of the application under Rule 6 of the Armed Forces

Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2008, list this case on 13.09.2019 for orders.

(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh) Member (A) Chairperson

PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 425 of 2019

Bhagwan Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Mohd Zafar Khan, Advocate on

behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

Heard Shri R Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Mohd Zafar Khan, learned counsel for the respondents.

Mr. Khan, while drawing our attention to the order passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition No.10954 of

2019 (Bhagwan Singh vs Union of India & others), states that may be on the

objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents with regard to

maintainability of the writ petition, the instant O.A. has been filed before the

Armed Forces Tribunal, but the applicant is neither subject to Army Act,

1950 nor Air Force Act, 1954 nor Navy Act, 1950, therefore, the instant O.A.

is not maintainable here.

Learned counsel for the applicant has not been able to controvert the

statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents at the bar,

rather he concedes that the applicant is not subject of the aforesaid three

Services.

Resultantly, the instant O.A. is dismissed being not maintainable.

(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh)

Member (A) Chairperson PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 427 of 2019

Lt Col (MNS) Tara Gupta (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate on behalf

of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel


Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi & Shri Anshuman Srivastava,

learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.

Heard learned counsel for both the sides on admission.

Admit.

Post admit notice is waived by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.


Counter Affidavit be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to

the Ld. Counsel for the applicant, who may file Rejoinder Affidavit within next

two weeks.

List again on 07.11.2019 for exchange of pleadings before the

Registrar Court.


PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 428 of 2019

Ex Rect Manish Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Dr Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate on

behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld.


Present: Shri MK Awasthi, Proxy counsel for Wg Cdr Ajit Kakkar

(Retd), learned counsel for the applicant and Dr Chet Narayan Singh, Ld.



Admit.

Post admit notice is waived by Dr Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel





two weeks.


Registrar Court.


PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 429 of 2019

Ex Nk Khemraj Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri VK Pandey, Advocate on behalf of

the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for


Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi & Shri Anshuman Srivastava,

learned counsel for the applicant and Shri VK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.


Admit.

Post admit notice is waived by Shri VK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.




two weeks.


Registrar Court.


PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 430 of 2019

Sep Deep Chandra Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on



Present: Shri Pankaj Pandey, Proxy Counsel for Shri Devansh

Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld.



Admit.

Post admit notice is waived by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel





two weeks.


Registrar Court.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 445 of 2019

Col RK Gupta Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal , Advocate



Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Be kept on board for tomorrow.

Registry is directed to tag the records of O.A.No.361 of 2019 with the

instant O.A.

List this case on 13.09.2019 for orders.

(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh) Member (A) Chairperson PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 446 of 2019

Ex Sub Jai Narayan Rajput Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate on behalf

of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel


Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Respondents are directed to place on record the consideration order

passed on representation of the applicant dated 22nd May 2019. Needless to

say that in case any order is passed on the said representation, copy

thereof, shall also be provided to the learned counsel for the applicant.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


O.A.No. 447 of 2019

Ex Hav Virender Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on



Present: Shri VP Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Consideration of this case has already landed before the Larger

Bench.

Await for the decision of the Larger Bench.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.95 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 209 of 2019

Satyendra Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019





Present: Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant


Ex.A. No.95 of 2019

This is an application for execution of the order dated 27.03.2019

passed in O.A.No.209 of 2019.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to seek instructions and to file compliance report.



PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Ex Sep Kundan Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri DK Pandey, Advocate on behalf of

the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for



DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ex.A. No.96 of 2019







PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.98 of 2019 Inre O.A.No.84 of 2019

Ex Hav Vijay Paul Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate on





Ex.A. No.98 of 2019







PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Ex Sep Harish Chandra Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019





Present: Shri R Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr

Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ex.A. No.99 of 2019



Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the applicant,

states that applicant in terms of the order dated 29th March 2019 approached

the respondents for Re-survey Medical Board (RSMB), but at both the

occasions, the needful was not done for one reason or the other. According

to the applicant, the respondents are unnecessari ly delaying the matter,

therefore, the applicant has been constrained to approach the Tribunal

through the medium of this Ex. Application.

There is no reason to doubt the averments made in the instant

application.

Let the applicant appear before the Re-survey Medical Board

(RSMB) on 14.10.2019, expecting that needful be done on that day itself as

the matter has been delayed unnecessarily. Long date of one month has

been given on the asking of the respondents as certain procedural

formalities have yet to be completed.



PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Smt Seeta Devi (W/o Ex Cfn (Late) Ram Bahadur Singh) Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri RC Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ex.A. No.106 of 2019



Since certain lapses have been put-forth on behalf of the respondent

nos.6 and 7 while complying with the order under execution, notice be

issued to the respondent nos.6 and 7.

Corrigendum PPO shall also be issued with regard to post RSMB

disability element as well.



PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.107 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 226 of 2014 with M.A.No.1898 of 2016

Ex Sub Radhey Shyam Upadhya Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Memo of appearance filed by Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate on




applicant and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ex.A. No.107 of 2019







PKG

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


M.A. No.752 of 2019 with M.A.No.753 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 141 of 2019

Union of India & others Applicants


Versus

Ex Hav Rajendra Singh Respondent

By Legal Practitioner for Respondent

Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the applicants-Union

of India (original respondents).

M.A. No.753 of 2019

This application for leave to appeal under section 31(2) of the Armed

Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 has been filed by the applicants-respondents,

whereby the applicants-Union of India (original respondents) is seeking

leave to move Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad impugning the

order of the Tribunal dated 2nd April 2019. Since there is delay of 03 months

and 17 days (applicant in Para 7 of the application states that there is delay

of one month and 20 days), M.A.No.752 of 2019 has also been moved

seeking condonation thereof.

For the reasons carved out in the application, we hereby condone

the aforesaid delay in fi ling the accompanied application for grant of leave,

but finding no point of law much less point of law of general public

importance in our judgment for grant of leave, M.A.No.753 of 2019 stands

dismissed.

Resultantly, both the M.As. viz M.A.No.752 of 2019 and M.A.No.753

of 2019 stand disposed of.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


M.A. No.758 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 57 of 2018



Versus

Gp Capt Vijay Suman Sharma (Retd) & others Respondents


Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the applicants-

Union of India (original respondents) and Dr Ashish Asthana, learned

counsel for the respondent (original applicant).

M.A. No.758 of 2019

This is an application for condonation of delay in moving the

application under section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 for

grant of leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.07.2019

in O.A.No. 57 of 2018, whereby the applicants- Union of India (original

respondents) is seeking leave to move Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at

Allahabad impugning the order of the Tribunal dated 29.07.2019.

Learned counsel for the applicants-Union of India could not point out

any point of law of general public importance involved in the decision so as

to grant leave to appeal.

Resultantly, M.A.No. 758 of 2019 stands dismissed.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


M.A. No.761 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 57 of 2018

Gp Capt Vijay Suman Sharma (Retd) & others Applicants


Versus


By Legal Practitioner for Respondent

Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Dr Ashish Asthana, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the respondents.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has fairly states

that some topographical mistake has been crept up in the prayer clause of

the instant application, where the date of order is mentioned as 06 th October

2017 passed in O.A.No.656 of 2014, whereas the instant matter relates to

O.A.No.57 of 2018 in which the order came to be passed on 29 th July 2019.

He makes an oral prayer for correction of the prayer clause.

Oral prayer stands acceded to. Learned counsel for the applicant is

allowed to carry out the said correction in his own hands by putting initial on

it in the open court.

M.A. No.761 of 2019

The instant application has been filed by the original applicant under

Section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, 2007 for seeking leave to appeal

against the order dated 29th July 2019 passed in O.A.No. 57 of 2018.

Heard Dr Ashish Asthana, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the respondents.

We have gone through the judgment once again for the purpose of

deciding the instant application.

In our view, no point of law much less point of law of general public

importance is involved in this case for grant of leave.

Resultantly, M.A.No. 761 of 2019 stands dismissed.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


M.A. No.764 of 2019 with MA No.765 of 2019 Inre T.A.No.562 of 2010

Ex Rect Darwan Singh Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner

Versus



Notes of the

Registry




on behalf of the respondent is taken on record.

Present: Shri DS Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner sand Dr


M.A. No.765 of 2019

Though this medium of M.A.No.765 of 2019, the applicant is seeking

grant of leave to appeal under Section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act

2007 questioning the order of the Tribunal dated 28th March 2011.

Since the applicant has chosen to move the Tribunal for grant of

leave, he in his wisdom has filed M.A.No.764 of 2019 also for condonation

of huge delay for which no cause much less sufficient cause has been

projected.

Even otherwise, for our satisfaction, we have perused the order

dated 28th March 2011 and find no point of law of any general public

importance involved in this case, for which we might have considered the

application for condonation of delay.

Resultantly, both the M.As. viz M.A.No. 764 of 2019, being

hopelessly time barred and M.A.No. 765 of 2019, there being no point of

law, stand dismissed.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.206 of 2017 with M.A.No. 55 of 2019 Inre O.A. (A) No. 314 of 2015

Shiv Ram Singh Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant

Versus



Notes of the

Registry




applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Due to paucity of time, the case could not be taken up.

List again on 05.11.2019 for orders.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No. 82 of 2018 with M.A.No. 295 of 2019 Inre O.A. No. 468 of 2017

Ex Sub Yogesh Chandra Singh Yadav Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.110 of 2018 Inre O.A. No.219 of 2015

Kamta Prasad Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Om Prakash Kushwaha, learned counsel for the

applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Awadhesh Kumar Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal & Shri Namit Sharma , Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.




Member (A) Chairperson SB

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Babu Ram Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KK Misra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Anurag Mishra , Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Prakash Swarup Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the

applicant and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal,, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.204 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 204 of 2015

Rajendra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Namit Sharma , Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}


Ex.A. No.207 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 6 of 2018

Shiw Prasad Tripathi Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019



Ashish Kumar Singh , Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Pandey Shambhu Prasad Sharma Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019



Anurag Mishra , Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}



Smt Pushpa Devi Applicant


Versus



Notes of

the Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KK Misra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

RC Shukla , Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 227 of 2018 Inre : O.A. No. 649 of 2017

Ex. Sub. Rakesh Kumar Applicant


Versus

Union of India & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

List again on 05.11.2019.


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Maj. Nagendra Singh Mamik (Retd.) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col. Y.R. Sharma (Retd.), Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Smt. Malti Devi W/o Hav. (Late) Deo Lakhan Prasad Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col. R.N. Singh and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh (Retd.), Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.


(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh) Member (A) Chairperson AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Sep. Sant Lal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms.

Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 35 of 2019 Inre : T.A. No. 349 of 2010

Ex. Nk. (TS) Ramayan Mishra Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner

Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Hav./Clk. Ram Roop Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri I.P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri

Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

M.A. No. 416 of 2018 Inre : O.A. No. (Nil) of 2018

Ram Chander Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh and Shri Manish Pratap Singh,

Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S. Sikarwar and Shri Ashutosh

Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



Member (A) Chairperson AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4



Court No.1


Ram Bhajan Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri R.N. Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.


M.A. No. 1194 of 2018

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.


For the reasons carved out in the application for condonation of delay

and as there is no serious objection by the respondents, the delay in filing the

Original Application is hereby condoned.


Let the Original Application be allotted its regular number today itself,

which stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld.



Since the concerned medical records have been made available by the

respondents for perusal of the Bench, we do not feel it necessary to call for filing of

the Counter Affidavit and Rejoinder Affidavit, as it will delay the disposal of case

whereby the applicant is seeking for grant of disability pension. It would rather

defeat the purpose of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Act, 2007.

With the consent of Ld. Counsel for both the parties, we have heard the

case finally.

Reserved for order.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Kamal Narain Dubey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri K.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr.


M.A. No. 1282 of 2018

There appears to be no reason for not treating the instant Original

Application maintainable, therefore, the objection raised by the respondents

on that count is hereby rejected.

So far as the delay in filing the instant Original, as per the noting of

the Registry it is of 08 years, 04 months and 01 day.

Delay on the face of it appears to be huge and objection has also

been raised by the respondents’ side for not condoning the said delay, but,

keeping in view the totally of the facts and circumstances of the case,

specially the applicant is seeking disability pension on account of injury

which according to him is attributable to military service, the said delay also

stands condoned.


Let the Original Application be allotted its regular number today

itself.

The main matter is thus ripe for admission, which stands admitted.

Post admit notice waived.

Post admit pleadings be completed by the Registrar.

List again on 07.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange

of pleadings.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

M.A. No. 1292 of 2018 with M.A. No. 466 of 2019 Inre : O.A. No. (Nil) of 2018

Raghubar Dayal Kanaujia Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri J.N. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Along with Diary No. 669 of 2016 (Decided)

Ex. Hav. Lal Babu Tiwari Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Shiv Kant Pandey and Ms. Nisha Pandey, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

M.A. No. 1443 of 2018 with M.A. No. 1444 of 2018, M.A. No. 82 of 2017

Inre : O.A. No. (Nil) of 2017

Sukhvinder Singh Kandari & Ex. Sub. Gauri Singh Applicants


Versus






Present: The applicant in person and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld.





Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Jagdish Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Kamal Singh Ghugatyal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri

Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Sep. Ram Niranjan Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 1683 of 2018

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.


For the reasons carved out in the application for condonation of

delay and as there is no serious objection by the respondents, the delay in

filing the Original Application is hereby condoned.



itself, which stands admitted.

Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld.



Counter Affidavit be fi led within six weeks with an advance copy to

the Ld. Counsel for the applicant, who may file Rejoinder Affidavit within

next two weeks.

List on 07.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange of

pleadings.


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Cfn. Mahangoo Prasad Vishwakarma Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Smt. Bindumati Wife of Chandra Sekar Singh (Deceased) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura and Ms. Kavita Belaura, Ld.


respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Brij Mohan Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura and Ms. Kavita Belaura, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Sep. Avnish Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col. A.K. Srivastava (Retd.), Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Debi Dayal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Hardeep Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Hony. Flg. Offr. Dinesh Chandra Chaturvedi (Retd.) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 242 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld.





next two weeks.

List this case on 07.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for

exchange of pleadings.


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Lt. Col. Soban Singh Danu (Retd.) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Mrs. Patil Usha Tanaji, Shri Gyanendra Kumar

Sharma and Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri


M.A. No. 254 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani,

Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




next two weeks.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Khem Raj Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Virendra Kumar Gutpa, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4



Court No.1


Ex. Hav. Sadanand Rai Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 292 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel









case finally.

Reserved for order.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Sgt. Ashok Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 298 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Dr. Shailendra Sharma

Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




next two weeks.




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Cfn. Yaduvir Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Shri Shailendra Kumar

Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld.


M.A. No. 319 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh,





next two weeks.

List on 07.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange of

pleadings.


Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Sgt. Santosh Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 334 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel









case finally.

Reserved for order.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Hav. Raj Bahadur Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 344 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta,





next two weeks.

List again on 07.11.2019 before the Registrar Court for exchange

of pleadings.


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Nk. Hira Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col. H.M. Maheshwari (Retd.), Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 350 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Post admit notice has been accepted by Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel









case finally.

Reserved for order.


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. L. Nk. Mithlesh Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Mukesh Kumar and Shri S.S. Rajawat, Ld. Counsel

for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narain Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.

M.A. No. 352 of 2019

Issue notice.

Notice accepted by Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



delay and there is no serious objection by the respondents, the delay in





Post admit notice has been accepted by Dr. Chet Narayan Singh,





next two weeks.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

M.A. No. 359 of 2019 with M.A. No. 488 of 2019 Inre : O.A. No. (Nil) of 2019

Ex. AC Naresh Chandra Nigam Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Virat Anand Singh and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Sgt. Ram Chandra Yadav Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Rahul Pandey and Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. J.W.O. Manoj Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Shri Virat Anand Singh and

Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1


Ex. Rect. Narendra Kumar Pal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh and Shri Ravi Kumar

Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 470 of 2012

Naseebul Hasan Syed Applicant


Versus

Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col. A.K. Srivastava (Retd.), Shri Dharam Raj Singh and

Shri Shyam Sunder Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh

Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 490 of 2017

Ashwani Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019






AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 644 of 2017

Ram Pratap Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

List again on 13.09.2019..


AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 687 of 2017

Smt. Sudha Devi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 180 of 2018 with M.A. No. 595 of 2019

Ex. Hav. Akhilesh Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

applicant and Shri Virendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 212 of 2018

Vishv Ranjan Prasad Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri

R.K.S. Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 248 of 2018

Shyam Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms.




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 325 of 2018

Sachchida Nand Tiwari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 401 of 2018

Kishan Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms.




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 408 of 2018

Col. Ravinder Singh, SM Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Anand Kumar Yadav and Shri S.G. Singh, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 415 of 2018

Braj Bhushan Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 500 of 2018

Sant Ram Maurya Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019






AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 14 of 2019

Krishna Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



Dr. S.N. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 56 of 2019

Ex. Spr. Bharat Chandra Biswas Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 57 of 2019

Ex. Nk. (TS) Subhash Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Bachchan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 58 of 2019

Gp. Capt. Deepak Bana, VSM (Retd.) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 83 of 2019

Ex. Hav. (Hony. Nb. Sub.) Virendra Pal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Virendra Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 85 of 2019 with M.A. No. 362 of 2019

Along with O.A. No. 64 of 2014 (Decided)

Ex. Nb. Sub. Ram Prasad Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Md.

Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 91 of 2019

Col Satish Kumar Dubey (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col (Retd) HM Maheshwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Shyam Singh and Shri DC Lohumi, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.

List again 13.09.2019.

(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice Virender Singh) Member (A) Chairperson AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 103 of 2019

Ex L Nk Ajeet Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

List again 13.09.2019


AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 123 of 2019 with MA No. 646/2019

and MA No. 529 of 2019

Ex Rect Mohd Sarfaraj Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Gyan Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 124 of 2019

Col Vinay Kumar Sarin (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri K.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 133 of 2019

Col Shiv Prasad Maurya (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col (Retd) AK Srivastava, Dharam Raj Singh, Shyam

Sunder Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri,




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 136 of 2019

Mahavir Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Akhilesh Kumar Sharma and Shri BB Tripathi, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Shri A.N. Tripathi and Gopal Kumar

Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



Member (A) Chairperson AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 191 of 2019

Smt Surender Kaur Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr

Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 204 of 2019

Ex Rect Abanish Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the

applicant and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 232 of 2019

Sgt Amit Bajpai (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Virat

Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 276 of 2019

Ex Hav Krishna Chandra Sharma Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 281 of 2019

Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Mool Chandra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Virendra Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 300 of 2019

Dadhichi Rai & others Applicants


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld Counsel for the

applicants and Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. 363 of 2019 with MA No. 609 of 2019

Ex Hav Hari Ram Applicant


Versus

Second Appellate Committee on

Pension (SACP) New Delhi & others Respondents





Present: Col Ashok Kumar (Retd) and Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld.

Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for

the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 386 of 2019

Ex Sigmn Raghu Bir Singh Negi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri VPS Vats, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

R.A. No. 73 of 2018 with MA No. 1919/2018

In re: OA No. 42 of 2016



Versus

Ex Swr Girish Chandra Respondents





Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicants

and Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4



Court No.1

R.A. No. 19 of 2019

In re: TA No. 1257 of 2010

Ex Hav RD Tripathi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Col (Retd) YR Sharma and Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld.


respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

R.A. No. 24 of 2019

In re: TA No. 668 of 2010

Ex Sep Krishan Kumar Shukla Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Nishant Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 226 of 2019

Ex Hav Rajendra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KK Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri Arun




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 653 of 2017

Rajesh Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Mrs




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 98 of 2011

Smt Ram Kumari Pandey W/o

Moti Lal Pandey (Deceased) Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri SK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri





Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 270 of 2016

Jamuna Prasad Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 513 of 2017

Smt Dharmsheela Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri

Virendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 621 of 2017

Bachcha Jee Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Shiv Kant Pandey and Ms Nisha Pandey, Ld. Counsel

for the Applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 624 of 2017

Raj Nath Mishra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Ms Nisha Pandey and Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Ld. Counsel

for the Applicant and Ms Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 629 of 2017

Vishnu Deo Tiwari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



for the Applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 641 of 2017 with MA No. 1581 of 2018

Mukhtyar Ahmed Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



for the applicant and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 656 of 2017

Nandji Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Dr




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 72 of 2018

Aftab Alam Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri Arun




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 159 of 2018

Arun Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri SG Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri RC

Shukla and Shri Amit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 311 of 2018

Shailendrabeer Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla,

Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 313 of 2018

Smt Jinntun Nishra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla and Shri Shailendra Kumar

Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 386 of 2018

Col Pankaj Mehra (Retd) Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri

Kaushik Chatterji, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 412 of 2018

Ram Dular Ram Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri

Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 424 of 2018

Abdul Rashid Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri BB Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Dr




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 427 of 2018

Hony Nb Sub Ram Karan Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Mrs Kavita Belaura and Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel

for the Applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 437 of 2018

Ex NC Rajendra Singh Rawat Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Lalit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri

Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 531 of 2018

Jai Narayan Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



for the Applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 604 of 2018

Smt Rambeti W/o Late Sep Rajendra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Birendra Prasad Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant

and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 608 of 2018

Hari Om Singh Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Ms

Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.




Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 15 of 2019

Anirudh Pratap Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Mrs Kaita Belaura and Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel

for the Applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 21 of 2019

Jitendra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant

and Dr Chet Narain Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 73 of 2019

Beer Bahadur Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019



for the Applicant and Ms Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 80 of 2019

Vijay Kumar Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 104 of 2019

Ex Sigmn Fasiullah Khan Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri SS Rajawat, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Shri




AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 111 of 2019

Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Ram Raj Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant

and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.



AKD/UKT

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No.176 of 2019

Uday Bir Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Girish Tiwari and Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for

the Applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)}

ORDER SHEET


Court No.1

O.A. No. 254 of 2019

Ex Nk Om Prakash Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


12.09.2019


Present: Shri Ashok Singh and Shri Vikas Singh Chauhan, Ld.

Counsel for the Applicant and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the

respondents.



form no. 4 order sheet armed forces …aftlko.up.nic.in › c1 daily order › c1 order -2019 › c1...

Documents