format: conversational interruptions: encouraged conclusions: speculative goal: dialogue and...

37
Format: Conversational Interruptions: Encouraged Conclusions: Speculative Goal: Dialogue and Community 1

Upload: dennis-fitzgerald

Post on 01-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Format: ConversationalInterruptions: EncouragedConclusions: SpeculativeGoal: Dialogue and Community

1

Assertion: Formerly separate domains of lecture capture technologies and the emerging options for publicly sharing lectures on Web 2.0 consumer platforms are destined for convergence.

This development will raise important questions related to policy, control, and governance.

2

Outline:•Brief Overview of the Lecture Capture Imperative•The Current Lecture Capture Publishing and Distribution Model•The Proliferation of Institutionally Sponsored Open Lecture Sites•Lecture Capture + YouTube / iTunes•What’s Next? Professors Go it Alone•Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer Media Platforms•Questions and Discussion

3

Brief Overview of the

Lecture CaptureImperative

4

Lecture Capture:The New Imperative

-Students Demand-Faculty Want-Evidence for Learning-Distance Education-Etc. etc. etc.

n=162http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752

5

Wainhouse Research October Study 2009http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752

6

Wainhouse Research October Study 2009http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752

7

Wainhouse Research October Study 2009http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752

8

Wainhouse Research October Study 2009http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752

9

A Fragmented Lecture Capture

Vendor Ecosystem

10

11

The Current Lecture Capture Publishing and Distribution

Model

12

-Proprietary Player

-Behind Authentication

-High Fidelity

-Many View Options

-Search

-Closed Captioning?

13

Advantages of Traditional Model & LMS Publication:

-Copyright Protections under TEACH Act

-No need to secure permissions for clips, videos, charts etc.

- Retain control of intellectual property.

14

Lecture Capture and LMS Integration:

-Captured Lectures Published Directly to LMS

-Lectures Only Available to Class Members

-Authentication

15

The Proliferation of Institutionally Sponsored

Open Lecture Sites

16

17

Courses in Consumer the Space: YouTube/EDU

-Dedicated Higher Ed Channels

- Content loaded by Institutions

-Often duplicates content on institution servers

18

Courses in Consumer the Space: iTunesU

-Authenticated and Open Models

- Tight Coupling with Application (iTunes) and Devices (iSlate etc.)

-Automatic Syncing

19

Institutional Managed Course Content on YouTube:

-Cheap publishing / storage platform

- Wide distribution and use

-Low fidelity / high convenience

20

Higher Ed. YouTube/EDU

-Not only courses

-Not only education

- Presentations

-Speeches

-Marketing

21

High Fidelity iTunesU

-Huge and growing public academic libraries

-High quality experiences

- Viable solution for both enrolled (paying students) and lifelong learners.

-Superior to on campus solutions?

22

Lecture Capture

+YouTube / iTunes

23

Lecture Capture Platforms Building in Publishing to Consumer Media Destinations

24

One Touch Upload to iTunesU and next YouTube

25

What’s Next?

Professors Go it Alone

26

-Instructors create their own channels

-Content not institutionally controlled

-Professors use lecture capture software to record own classes without technical support

27

-Instructors publish on their own – without permission (or even institutional awareness)

-Bypass Central IT

-Content now lives in the Cloud: who owns, supports, maintains?

28

http://chronicle.com/article/YouTube-Professors-Scholars/22847/

29

Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture

Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer

Media Platforms

30

Will only lectures by the institution’s most erudite scholars and dynamic professors be shared, or will the published lectures be more inclusive?

31

Who decides which lectures are shared?

32

If a faculty member wants her lectures posted on iTunes U or YouTube EDU (and the lecture capture software supports this with automatic or one-button uploading), will a policy be necessary to support or thwart these postings?

33

Do all published lectures reflect and add value to the brand of institution?

34

How does the posting of lectures on iTunes U or YouTube EDU impact the competitive advantage of the institution?

35

What will result if the policy of our institution differs from that of peer or competing institutions?

36

Questions and Discussion

37