formation of primordial black holes in double inflation · based on mk mukaida yanagida,...
TRANSCRIPT
Formation of Primordial Black Holes in Double Inflation
Masahiro Kawasaki(ICRR and Kavli-IPMU, University of Tokyo)
Based on MK Mukaida Yanagida, arXiv:1605.04974 MK Kusenko Tada Yanagida arXiv:1606.07631 Inomate MK Tada in preparation
1. Introduction
• Primordial Black Holes (PBHs) have attracted interest for many years
• PBHs can be formed by gravitational collapse of over-density region with Hubble radius in the early universe
• PBHs with mass < 1015 g would have evaporated by now through Hawking radiation
• PBHs with larger masses can exist in the present universe but various constraints on their abundance are imposed
• PBHs can give a significant contribution to dark matter if MBH = 1021-24 g
• Large density fluctuations δ with O(0.1) are required for PBH formation but δ ~ O(10-5 ) on CMB scale
2
Hawking (1971)
Hawking (1974)
• We consider double inflation (preinflation+new inflation)
Preinflation (no specific model is required) accounts for perturbations on large scale observed by Planck
New inflation ( after preinflation) with e-fold Nnew < 50 produces large curvature perturbations on small scales
• This double inflation is realized in supergravity framework
3
P(k)
k
preinflation new inflation
kCMB kPBH
Today’s Talk
1. Introduction
2. PBH formation in radiation dominated universe
3. New inflation model and PBH formation
4. New inflation in supergravity
5. Production of gravitational waves
6. Conclusion
4
2. PBH formation in radiation dominated universe• Region with Hubble radius collapses if its over-density is
higher than δc (≈0.3)
• PBH mass
• PBH abundance is estimated by Press-Schechter formalism
• PBH mass fraction β=ρPBH(M)/ρ
• Present PBH fraction to DM
5
MPBH ' 3.6M
k
106Mpc1
2
' 4.5M
T
0.1GeV
2
(M) =
Z
c
d1p
22(k)
exp
2
22(k)
[ fraction per log M ]
fPBH,tot =
Zd logMfPBH(M)
P(k)P(k) O(102)
for PBH formation
2(k) : variance of the comoving density perturbation coarse-grained on k1
2(k) =
Zd log k0 W 2
(k0/k)16
81
(k0/k)4P(k0)
fPBH(M) =PBH(M)
DM' 1.3 108 (M)
MPBH
M
1/2
3. New Inflation after Preinflation• Potential for new inflation
Hubble
• Slow-roll parameter
• Curvature perturbation
PBH formation
6
'
V (')
=1
2
V 0
V
2
=1
2
c
v2 ' 2ng
'n1
v2+ · · ·
2
=V 00
V= 2n(n 1)g
'n2
v2+ · · ·
V (') =v2 g'n
2 cv2' 1
2v4'2
n = 3, 4, · · · Mp = 1
P1/2 O(0.1) for c v4
P1/2 =
Hinf
2
1p2
' 1
2p3
v4
c+ v2'+ 2ng'n1 1
2p3
v4
c(' . c
v2)
v4
Hinf 'v2p3
1 1 ) inflation
New inflation after preinflation• Initial value for the inflaton ?
Interaction with the inflaton of preinflation Hubble induced mass term
Just before new inflation
• Shape of power spectrum of curvature perturbationsdepends on κ > 0 or κ < 0spectral index
7
'
V H2'2
V () +V H2'2 cv2'+ · · · ) ' cv2
H2
'ini c
v2
H v2
P1/2 1
2p3
v4
c O(0.1) for c v4
ns 1 ' 2 6 ' 3c2
v4 2 4n(n 1)g
'n2
v2
(e.g. V m22'2)
• κ < 0
power spectrum has a peak when
• κ ~0
power spectrum is almost flat around
• κ > 0
power spectrum takes the largest value at
8
V
'V 00 0
'
P
V 00 0
' 'ini
V
'
'
Pred-tilted ns 1 < 0
) ns 1 = 0
'
P
flat
PBHs with very wide range of mass are produced
PBHs with wide range of mass are produced
c2/v4 1
O(0.1)' 'ini
PBHs with narrow range of mass are produced
V
'
|| . c2/v4 v4 1
Power spectrum of curvature perturbations• Estimate power spectrum using slow-roll approximation
• Another peak at k~106 Mpc-1
Hubble induced term cannot neglected at the beginning of new inflation, which flattens the potential
However, it should be examined more carefully 9
0.01 100.00 106 1010 1014 1018 1022
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.100
k[Mpc-1]
ζ
dashed
v = 104
= 0.18
c = 1.56 1016
g = 4.26 103
solid
v = 104
= 0.44
c = 5.20 1016
g = 5.04 103
μ distortion of CMB due to Silk damping
κ < 0
reenter the horizon before new inflation
MK Kusenko Tada Yanagida (2016)
flat peak
Abundance of produced PBHs
• Total PBH fraction to DM can be 1
• Another peak at GW150914 recently detected by LIGO/Virgo collaboration?
10
1016
1021
1026
1031
1036
10-9
10-7
10-5
0.001
0.100
MPBH [g]
ΩPBH/ΩDM
EGγ
Femtolensing
Kepler
EROS/MACHO
FIRAS
WMAP3
White Dwarf
PBH/DM =
Zd logMfPBH(M) ' 1
PBH fraction to DM in each logarithmic mass bin
MK Kusenko Tada Yanagida (2016)
MPBH 30M
κ < 0
Abundance of produced PBHs
• For PBHs with wide range of mass are produced
• For PBHs with very narrow range of mass are produced
• For both cases PBH can be DM
11
v = 4 104
c = 0.6v4
g = 65 103
v = 4 104
c = 0.4v4
= 0.25g = 0.30 103
c2/v4 1
O(0.1)
κ ~ 0
MK Mukaida Yanagida (2016)
O(0.1)
c2/v4 1
κ > 0
KeplerHawking
Star Formation
FemtolensingMACHO/EROS
FIRASWMAP3
NS in GCs
ΩPBH/Ωc
KeplerHawking
Star Formation
FemtolensingMACHO/EROS
FIRASWMAP3
NS in GCs
ΩPBH/Ωc
Another peak at large PBH mass• The corresponding perturbations reenter the horizon before
new inflation
• We need careful numerical calculation including all 1st order perturbations of metrics and scalar fields
• Chaotic inflation + New inflation with
• Peak height crucially depends on the Hubble induced term
12
cH=0.583
-4
10
10-19
10-9
10-14
PB
HD
MΩ
/
Ω
1016
1021
1026
1031
1036
M [g]PBH
cH=1
-4
10
10-19
10-9
10-14
1016
1021
1026
1031
1036
M [g]PBH
PB
HD
MΩ
/
Ω
V =
4m22'2 H2'2
= 1 = 0.58
Inomate MK Tada (2016)
4. New Inflation in Supergravity• Potential of a scalar field in supergravity
• Superpotential W (assuming Z2nR R-symmetry)
• Kähler potential
• Inflaton potential
• Potential minimum
13
V () = eK(DW )K(DW ) 3|W |2
W () = v2 g
n+ 1n+1
K() = ||2 +
4||4 + · · ·
V (') = v4
2v4'2 g
2n/21v2n + · · ·
Inflaton ' =p2Re
'
V (')
hV (')i ' 3v4v2
g
2/n
canceled by SUSY contribution µ4SUSY
m3/2 ' µ2SUSY/
p3 ' v2
v2
g
1/n
DW =@W
@+
@K
@W
K =
@2K
@@
1
Izawa Yanagida (1997)
New Inflation in Supergravity• Constant term in superpotential
Linear term
• Hubble induced term Inflaton obtains the Hubble induced mass during and after the first inflation(=preinflation) through the term
• Just before new inflation starts, the inflaton has the initial value
• Potential
• PBH formation 14
W = W () + c
V ' eK(Vpre + · · · ) H2'2 O(1)
'
Vlin = 2p2v2'
'i c
v2 No initial value problem
V (') = v4 2p2cv2'
2v4'2 gp
2v23 + · · ·
c v4
SUSY breaking sector
• Dynamical SUSY breaking models
• If the origin of Z is destabilized due to a large Yukawa coupling (~ 4π )
• New inflation model (n=3)
15
µ2SUSY =
2
4
hZi '
4
WSUSY 3
(4)2 c µ3
SUSY
c v4c µ3
SUSY
consistent µSUSY v4/3
Izawa Yanagida (1996), Intriligator Thomas(1996)
Chacko Luty Ponton (1998)
WSUSY =2
4Z (Z: SUSY breaking field)
5. Production of gravitational waves• PBHs form from large curvature perturbations
• 2nd order perturbations ~ induce a source term of tensor perturbations
16
h00~k+ 2Hh0
~k+ k2h~k = S(~k, t)
MPBH 0.1 10 M 10-9 10-8 10-7Observed GW frequency [Hz]
10-1210-1110-1010-910-810-710-610-510-410-3
Ω gw(f)
BBN + CMB
Spectral estimationSMBH binary limitf = 1yr-1
• GWs can be probed future detectors
• Pulsar timing experiments already give a stringent constraint on PBHs with
fGW 2 109Hz(MPBH/M)1/2
GWh2 108(P/102)2
EPTA (2015)
O(~k ~k~k0) Moore Cole Berry (2015)
Saito Yokoyama (2009) Bugaev Kulimai (2010)
6. Conclusion
• PBHs can be formed in double inflation (=preinflation + new inflation)
• The new inflation potential has linear and quadratic terms which play an important role in determining the initial value and amplitude of curvature perturbations
• In this model PBHs with wide range of mass can be produced and account for DM of the universe
• The model is realized in framework of supergravity
• Large curvature perturbations required for PBH production also produce gravitational waves which will be proved by future detectors
17
Backup
18
Power spectrum of curvature perturbations with double peaks
19
κ=0.128 (ch=0.583)double peak
μ-distortion
0.1 1000.0 107 1011 1015 1019
10-9
10-6
0.001
1
k[Mpc-1 ]
ℛ