formula sae cooling system reuben ness riki hopkins craig mclain

15
Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Upload: zoe-greenhill

Post on 14-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Formula SAE

Cooling SystemReuben NessRiki HopkinsCraig McLain

Page 2: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Background

Formula Society of Automotive Engineers (FSAE) is an international engineering competition where students design, build, and test small-scale autocross racing vehicles.

Competitions are held annually with regulations that create a real world challenge.

In the competition, cooling related problems are not uncommon amongst competitors, and Portland State University’s (PSU) FSAE team in 2010 was not an exception.

Page 3: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

PSU’s FSAE team experienced the cooling challenges in 2010.

The engine ran at temperatures hotter then ideal for optimized performance during testing and competition.

The car would over heat when idled for an extended time, or when ran hard and then brought to an idle shortly there after, due to the insufficient airflow to the cooling system at idle.

The car had hard hot starting due to excessive temperatures.

Page 4: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Mission Statement

The FSAE Cooling capstone team will design a new solution for the cooling of the 2011 FSAE car. The goal is to produce a solution through an understanding of the physics involved in the problem and the application of effective engineering methods. The final design will be prototyped and documented, with all of its performance characteristics quantified.

Page 5: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Design Requirements

Quality and Reliability Steady heat transfer of 30HP and maintaining 210°F at peak loading conditions.

Performance Heat transfer of 30HP (1200Btu/min)

One year of service life

Size and shapeMust not extend beyond the outer edge of the tire and must not negatively effect the center of gravity of the car by more then 0.5 in.

Must meet all FSAE regulations

Must meet the $200 budget.

Page 6: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

External Search

Motorcycle Engine Radiators

Honda CBR600F4iAdvantages• Cheap• Honda-designed

Disadvantages• Too small• Hard to package

Honda CBR900RR

Advantages• Larger size• Easier to package• Designed to be light and efficient

Disadvantages• Expensive• Hard to find

Page 7: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

D-Sports Racer/Mini Sprint/Midget

Advantages• Designed for motorcycle

engines• Correct core area• Designed to be light and

efficient

Disadvantages• Core too thick• Hard to package

Page 8: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Custom Radiator

AdvantagesBuilt to specificationPackage how we want

DisadvantagesExpensiveCore properties unknown

Page 9: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Single or dual pass

Single pass• Conventional• Heat transfer advantages• Fan performance

Dual pass• Easier to plumb• Harder to package tanks

Page 10: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Fan Sizing

Cheap/Free• Too small (2010)• Unreliable

Quality• Known performance• Reliable• Expensive

Page 11: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Concept Evaluation

Laid out Decision MatricesEngineering calculations

RadiatorMac's Mac's

ScaledOther Custom fabrication

Other Custom fabrication scaled

Off the shelf

Off the shelf scaled

Cost ~$300 7 >$300 4.5 unknown 4

Timeline fits 10 unknown 4 unknown 4

Capstone fits 10 unknown 4 does not fit 0

Interface excellent 10 good-excellent 9 unknown 4

Totals: 37 21.5 12

FanMac's Mac's

scaledJegs Jegs scaled

Cost $100 7 $60 8.5

Timeline fits 10 fits 10

Capstone fits 10 fits 10

Quality excellent 10 questionable 5

Interface good 8 good 8

Actual performance

excellent 10 questionable/poor 4

Totals: 55 46

Page 12: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Calculations

Matlab• Extensive• Syntax issues• Not robust code

“Hand” Calcs• Heat transfer calcs• Tedious• Can be checked• Require more assumptions

Page 13: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Final Design

Final Dimension: 10.75”x16.5” with a one inch core (177 sq inches)

Added one inch to each side for increased factor of safety

Aluminum hoses offer less weight than conventional hoses and cleaner looks

10” 1100 CFM fan to provide airflow

Page 14: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Analysis

Completed:•Pressure drop experiment•Idle heat load•Fan testing and validation•Attempted to find heat transfer coefficientIn Progress:•Experiment to confirm horsepower rejection at idle•Repeat experiment with the car on a dyno to obtain numbers with the engine under load•Data will be used to complete a mathematical model of the cooling system

Page 15: Formula SAE Cooling System Reuben Ness Riki Hopkins Craig McLain

Conclusions

There is no such thing as a perfect designGoals:• Understand the system being designed• Prototype and test• Solve past problems

End Products:• Cooling system that satisfies the PDS

requirements• Mathematical model of the Cooling system