frames_mf asdfg asdfg
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
1/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 1 -
FRAMES
FORCES METHODEXTERNAL LOADS
Using the forces method, let solve the following frame subjected to the indicated external loads.
Numerical data:
3,8 ; 3 ; 30 / ; 48 ; 64L m H m p kN m F kN M kN m= = = = =
Solution:
4I0
I0
2I0
F
4I0
p
L L/3
3H/4
H
1. Establishing the static indeterminacy degree:The degree of static indeterminacy is given by the following relationship:
3 ( ) 3 1 (0 6) -3n c l r s = + = + =
The frame is three times statically indeterminate.
2. Choosing the primary system:The forces methodwas originally developed by J.G. Maxwell and refined by Otto Mohr and Muller-
Breslau. This method was one of the first available for the analysis of statically indeterminate structures.
The force method consists of writing equations that satisfy the compatibility and forces displacement
requirements for the structure and involve redundant forces as the unknowns. The coefficients of these
unknowns are called flexibility coefficients. Since compatibility forms the basis for this method, it has
sometimes been referred to as the compatibility methodor the method of consistent deformations.Once the redundant forces have been determined, the structure are determined by satisfying the
equilibrium requirements for the structure. The fundamental principles involved in applying this method
are easy to understand and develop.
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
2/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 2 -
First, a primary systemmust be chosen and attached to the hyperstatic frame. The primary system must
be statically determinate and loaded with the external loads (forces, temperature variation, different
settlements) and with the internal efforts and/or reactive forces or bending moments which correspond
and must be compatible to all supplementary removed links, identified as 1, 2 ,...X X . the unknowns to
be solved.Theoretically, in the forces method an infinite number of primary systems could be attached to the
original hyperstatic system. Usually, the most suitable or the optimum primary system will be chosen
considering the numerical analysis the simplest way to draw the bending moment diagrams, the
minimum number of beams involved in the multiplications, the structure and/or the load symmetry etc.
For the above frame, some examples of primary systems are shown in Fig. 2.b, 2.c, 2.d, 2.e, and theoptimum one was considered the frame presented in Fig. 2.a
4I0
I0
2I0
F
4I0
p
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
X 1
X 2
X 3
a)
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
X3
X2
X1
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
X3
X1
X2
b) c) Mechanism!Fig. 2
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
3/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 3 -
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
X1 X1
X2
X2
X3
X3
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
X1
X2
X2
X2
d) e) Critical system!Fig. 2(continued)3. Elastic equilibrium equations
are obtained writing the compatibility relationships on each removed link, which means a
null displacement (translation or rotation) on each unknown directioni
X ,
and, if expanded, the following equations system results:
11 1 12 2 13 3 1
21 1 22 2 23 3 2
31 1 32 2 33 3 3
0
0
0
p
p
p
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ + + =
+ + + =
+ + + =
4. Find out the unknowns coefficients and the corresponding free terms4.1.The main and secondary coefficients
are obtained with the following simplified Mohr-Maxwell relationships (the axial and shear forceeffects are neglected):
0
l
i iM M dxEIii
0 0
l l
i jj iM M M M
dx dxEI EIij ji
= = where Mi si Mj are the bending moments diagrams on the primary system which is loaded only
withi
X =1, andj
X =1 respectively, representing the real load,i
M andj
M are the bending moments
diagrams on the primary system loaded only with a virtual unit force 1 , representing the virtual load.
Of course, by the geometrical point of view, the real bending moments diagrams are identical with the
virtual bending moments diagrams, consequently only one diagram will be drawn.
0i
a
X =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
4/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 4 -
- Primary system loaded with 1X = 1, and with 1 , respectively ( 1 1M M ):
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
5,25
3
M1X =11
1
M1
0; 1 3 3 ; 0; 3 ;
1 5,25 5,25 ; 5,25 ; 5,25 .
AB CB BD
A B B B
BD DE
D D E
M M kNm M M kNm
M kNm M kNm M kNm
= = = = =
= = = =
( )
2 21 111
0 00
0 0
1 1 2 2, 253 3 3 2 3 2 5, 25 3 5, 25 5, 25 3
2 2 3 6
1 78,67 5,25 5.07 5.25
4
l
b
M Mdx
EI E I E I
E I EI
= = + + + + +
+ =
- Primary system loaded with 2X = 1, and with 1 , respectively ( 2 2M M ):
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D
E
5,07
M2
X =121
M2
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
5/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 5 -
0A B C DM M M M= = = =
5,07E
M kNm=
2 222
0 00
1 1 2 10,865,07 5,07 5,07
4 2 3
l
b
M Mdx
EI E I EI = = =
- Primary system loaded with 3X = 1, and with 1 , respectively ( 3 3M M ):
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D
E
3,8
3,8
1,27
M3
X =13
1
M3
0
AM = ;
0; 1 3,8 3,8 ; 0; 3,8 ; 3,8 ;CB AB BC BDC B B B DM M kNm M M kNm M kNm= = = = = =
3,8 ; 1,27DED E
M kNm M kNm= =
( )
3 333
0 00
2 2
0 0
1 1 2 13,8 3,8 3,8 3,8 2, 25 3,8
4 2 3
5,07 41,8
2 3,8 2 1, 27 3,8 1, 27 1,27 3,86 4
l
b
M Mdx
EI E I E I
E I EI
= = + +
+ + =
The secondary coefficients are:
1 2 1 212 21
0 00 0
1 5,07 5,07 16,875,25
4 2
l l
b b
M M M Mdx dx
EI EI E I EI
= = = = =
1 313 31
0 0 00
1 (3 5,25) 2, 25 1 1 1 43,693,8 3,8 5.07 5.25 1.27 5.07 5.25
2 4 2 2
l
b
M Mdx
EI EI E I EI
+ = = = + =
2 3 3 2
23 320 0
0 0
5,07 1,35(2 5, 07 1, 27 5, 07 3,8)
6 4
l l
b b
M M M Mdx dx
EI EI E I EI
= = = = =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
6/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 6 -
The sum of the unknowns coefficients is:
, 1
78, 67 10,86 41,8 2 (43, 69 16,87 1,35) 182, 27sn
I
SS ij
i j
=
= = + + + =
4.2. The free terms are obtained applying also the simplified Mohr-Maxwell equation:
0
l
p i
ip
b
M Mdx
EI
where
pM is the bending moment diagram on the primary system produced by the external loads (and,
of course, it represents the real load).
1
1
00
0 0
2,25(2 216, 6 3 2 108, 6 5, 25 216, 6 5, 25 108, 6 3)
6
5,07 263, 24( 2 108, 6 5, 25 2 469, 36 5, 25 108, 6 5, 25 469, 36 5, 25)
6 4
l
p
p
b
M Mdx
EI E I
E I EI
= = + + + +
+ + + =
( )220 0
0
5,07 889,092 469, 36 5, 07 108, 6 5, 07
6 4
l
p
p
b
M Mdx
EI E I EI = = + =
3
3
0 00
0 0
1 1 3 1 (216,6 108,6) 2.253,8 216,6 3,8 3,8
4 3 4 2
5,07 1606( 2 108, 6 3,8 2 469,36 1, 27 108, 6 1, 27 469, 36 3,8)
6 4
l
p
p
b
M Mdx
EI E I E I
E I EI
+ = = +
+ + + =
48 kN
30 kN/m
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D
E
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
216,6
108,6
469,36
Mp
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
7/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 7 -
The sum of all free terms is:
1
263, 24 889, 09 1606 2758.33sn
I
Sp ip
i=
= = =
5. Checking the unknown coefficients and the free termsThe coefficients are correctly solved if the following condition is checked:
2
1 10
s s
ln n
I II sSS ij SS
i j b
Mdx
EI
= =
= = =
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
Ms
3
3,8
9,05
1,09
6,8
X =13
X =12
X =11
( )( )
2
0 00
2 2
0
2 2
0 0
1 1 2 1 1 23 3 3 3,8 3,8 3,8
2 2 3 4 2 3
2,252 6,8 2 9,05 6,8 9,05 6,8 9,05
6
5,07 182,272 9,05 2 1,09 9,05 1,09 9,05 1,09
6 4
l
II sSS
b
Mdx
EI E I E I
E I
E I EI
= = + +
+ + + + +
+ + =
I II
SS SS =
Condition checked, the unknown coefficients are correctly solved.
The free terms are correctly solved if the following condition is checked:
10
s
ln
p sI IISp ip Sp
i b
M M dxEI=
= = =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
8/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 8 -
( )
( )
00
0
0 0
1 1 3216,6 3,8 3,8
4 3 4
2,252 216,6 6,8 2 108, 6 9,05 108, 6 6,8 216, 6 9,056
5,07 2758.332 108, 6 9, 05 2 469, 36 1, 09 463, 36 9, 05 108, 6 1, 09
6 4
l
p sII
sp
b
M Mdx
EI E I
E I
E I EI
= =
+ + + +
+ + + =
I II
Sp Sp =
Condition checked, the free terms are correctly solved.
6.
Let solve the system of equations to find out the unknownsXi
11 1 12 2 13 3 1
21 1 22 2 23 3 2
31 1 32 2 33 3 3
0
0
0
p
p
p
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ + + =
+ + + =
+ + + =
1 2 3
0 0 0 0
1 2 3
0 0 0 0
1 2 3
0 0 0 0
78,67 16,87 43,69 263,240
16,87 10,86 1,35 889,09 0
43,39 1,35 41,8 16060
X X XEI EI EI EI
X X XEI EI EI EI
X X XEI EI EI EI
+ =
+ =
+ =
or
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
78,67 16,87 43,69 263, 24
16,87 10,86 1,35 889,09
43,39 1,35 41,8 1606
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ =
+ =
+ =
having the following solution:
1
2
3
6.293
77.99
47.472
X kN
X kN
X kN
=
=
=
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
9/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 9 -
7. Drawing the final internal efforts diagrams:
3.8 1.27
2.25
3.0
48 kN
30 kN/m
6.29 kN
47.47 kN
77.99 kN
-
N
-
77.99 kN
11.46 kN
41.71 kN
-
+
-
6.29 kN
41.71 kN
Q
47.47 kN
66.53 kN+
-
11.46 kN
+
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
10/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 10 -
M
39.37 kNm
19.34 kNm
54.48 kNm
18.87 kNm
35.61 kNm37.55 kNm
1.58 m
8. Checking the diagrams8.1 Static equilibrium checks:
- Joint equilibrium of the node B:
41.71 48 6.29 0
77.99 11, 46 66.53 0
54.48 18.87 35.61 0
X
Y
node
F
F
M
= + =
= =
= + + =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
11/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 11 -
The final bending moment diagram Mf could be checked applying the virtual work method on the
following floor mechanism or on any other local or global mechanism:
M
39.37 kNm
54.48 kNm
18.87 kNm
48 kN
1= 2 25
2= 3
( )1 2( ) (39,37 54, 48) 48 18,87 39,37 54,48 48 18,87 0
2, 25 3VW
= + + = + + =
The bending moment diagram is checked.
8.2 Elastic checkings of the final bending moment diagram Mf:
The final bending moment diagram Mf is correctly drawn if the following condition is
checked:
0
0i
l
f i
X
b
M M
dxEI
= =
which means that the displacement on any unknown direction must be null.
( )
( )
1
1
0
0 0
5,072 39.37 5.25 2 19.34 5.25 39.37 5.25 19.34 5.25
6 4
2.25 1 1 22 39.37 5.25 2 3 54.48 39.37 3 54.48 5.25 18.87 3 3 0
4 2 3
l
f
X
b
M Mdx
EI E I
E I E I
= = + +
+ + =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
12/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 12 -
SUPPORT SETTLEMENTS
Applying the forces method, let draw the internal efforts diagrams caused by indicated
support settlements.
Numerical data:
03,8 ; 3 ; 30 / ; 48 ; 1 ; 1, 4L m H m p kN m F kN v cm = = = = = =
3,8m 1,27m
2,25m
3m
A
B
C
D E
v
1. The same primary system as before will be used:4I0
I0
2I0
4I0
3,8 m 1,27 m
2,25 m
3 m
X 1
X 2
X 3
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
13/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 13 -
2. The elastic equilibrium system of equations is:11 1 12 2 13 3 1
21 1 22 2 23 3 2
31 1 32 2 33 3 3
c
c
c
X X X L
X X X L
X X X L
+ + =
+ + =
+ + =
The main and the secondary coefficients are the same, and they were calculated and checked in
the above application.
3. The free terms are calculated by the following virtual work relationships:( )
1i
kic i k L R=
where:
1 is the virtual unit load (concentrated force/bending moment or a couple of concentratedforces/bending moments, respectively) applied on the direction of the unknownX
i;
i - the corresponding support settlement on the direction of the unknownXi;
( )i
kR the reactive forces in the kexternal link caused by the virtual unit load1.
The primary system is consecutively loaded with a virtual unit force1 on eachXidirection, and
the reactive forces in the external links of the primary system will be calculated.
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
Rx1,1
Rx1,2
1
1,1 1 5,25 5,25xR = =
1,1 1 1xR = =
1
1,41 0 1 0 5,25 0,128
180c
L
= + =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
14/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 14 -
2,1 1 5,07 5,07xR = = 3,1 1 1, 27 1, 27xR = =
2,1 1 1xR = = 3,1 1xR =
2
1,41 0 1 0 5,07 0,124
180c
L
= + + = 31,4
1 0,01 1 0 1,27 0,021180
cL
= + + =
The sum of all free terms is:
1
0,128 0,124 0, 021 0, 017sn
I
sc ic
i
L L=
= = + + =
4. Checking the free termsThe free terms are correctly solved if the following condition is checked:
( )
( 1 ) ( )s
IIksc i k
L R= +
The primary system is loaded with all unit forces applied on the correspondingXidirections, and the
reactive forces are calculated.
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
Rx2,1
Rx2,2
1
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
Rx3,2
Rx3,1
1
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
15/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 15 -
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
Rs3
Rs2
Rs1
1
1
1
1 1sR =
2 2sR =
3 1 1,27 1 5,25 1 5,07 1,09sR = + =
Consequently,
1,4 3,14151 0,01 1 0 2 0 1,09 0,017
180
II
scL
= + + + =
Condition checked, the free terms are correctly solved.
5. Solving the system of elastic equilibrium equations ( )7 4 3 20 2,1 10 72 10 151,2 10E I kNm = = 11 1 12 2 13 3 1
21 1 22 2 23 3 2
31 1 32 2 33 3 3
c
c
c
X X X L
X X X LX X X L
+ + =
+ + = + + =
31 2 3
31 2 3
31 2 3
78,67 16,87 43,69 19,3536 10
16,87 10,86 1,35 18,7488 10
43,39 1,35 41,8 3,1752 10
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ =
+ =
+ =
having the solution
{ }
391.395
2302258.775
X
=
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
16/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 16 -
6. Drawing the final internal efforts diagrams:The primary system is loaded with allthe unknown reactive and/or internal efforts, considering
the resulted sign, and the diagrams will be drawn as for a statically determinate system.
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
258,775
2302
391,395
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
BC
D E
2302
2043,225
391,395
N Diagrama finala eforturilor axiale
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
17/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 17 -
Q Diagrama finala forelor tietoare
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
B C
D E
983,345
1071,478
1174,185190,84
9287,672
1071,478
M
M Diagrama finala momentelor ncovoietoare
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
18/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 18 -
Checkingthe final bending moment diagramMfapplying the virtual work method for the following
floor mechanism:
M
1071.48 kNm
190.84 kNm
1174.18 kNm
1= 2 25
2= 3
1 2( ) ( 1071.48 190.84) 1174.18 ( 1071.48 190.84) 1174.18 0
2.25 3LMV
= + + = + + =
The bending moment diagram is checked.
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
19/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 19 -
TEMPERATURE VARIATION
Let solve the following frame to the indicated non-uniform temperature variation
applying the forces method
Numerical data:3
5 5 2 40
40 603,8 ; 3 ; 10 ; 2,1 10 / ;
12tL m H m E daN cm I cm
= = = = =
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
BC
D
E
100
100
100 20
0
80
Considering for the beam with the reference moment of inertia a rectangular cross-section3
4
0
40 60
12I cm
=
and adopting the hypothesis that the width of all structural elements is the same (b = constant), it
results:
- for the beams with the moment of inertia of 02I
0 0
0
3 3
2
22 7512 12
I I
I
b h b hh cm
= =
- for the beams with the moment of inertia 04I
0 0
0
3 3
4
44 9512 12
I I
I
b h b hh cm
= =
where 30 0nI Ih h n= .
1. Primary system and solving the unknown coefficients
The primary system which will be used is the same, consequently the main and secondary
coefficients are the same as before, and are already solved.
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
20/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 20 -
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
BC
D
E
100
100
100 20
0
80
X1
X2
X3
2. The compatibility equation system is:
11 1 12 2 13 3 1
21 1 22 2 23 3 2
31 1 32 2 33 3 3
0
0
0
t
t
t
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ + + =
+ + + = + + + =
3. The free terms will be calculated with the following relationship
i i
oo
it t ax t N M
tt
h
=
where:
t is the linear variation coefficient -
5 1
10t oC
(quite the same for the concrete and steel);
o
axt is the average temperature in the longitudinal axis of the beam:2
o oo i eax
t tt
+= ;
ot is the temperature difference between the extreme fibers of the cross-sectional area (usually
the temperature difference between the internal side of the beam and external one,
respectively): o o oi et t t = ;
h is the height of the beam cross-section;
,i iN M
are the corresponding axial effort and bending moment diagrams area, respectively,
of the beams.
The bending moment diagrams were already drawn before, in the first solved application, and
now, only the axial effort diagrams will be drawn, consecutively loading the primary system with
virtual unit forces1on eachXidirection.
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
21/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 21 -
A
BC
D E
X =11
N1
1
A
BC
D E
X =12
N2
1
A
BC
D E
X =12N3
1
The average temperatures in the longitudinal axis of the beams are:
2
o oo o o oi e
ax i e
t tt t t t
+= =
BARA ti te Dt tax
AB 20 10 10 15
BC 20 10 10 15
BD 10 10 0 10
DE 10 8 2 9
The tensioned fibers due the temperature variationis drawn in the figure below with a dashed
line:
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
22/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 22 -
A
BC
D E
100100
100 20
0
80
X1
X2
X3
The primary system and tensioned fibers
due to the temperature variation
The free terms values are:
1 1 1 111 , , , , ,
5 10 1 2
10 9 5,07 3 3 0 0 5,07 5,25 156,410,75 2 0,95
oo o o
o BCAB BD DEt t ax DE t N M AB M BD M BC M DE
AB BD BC DE
tt t tt
h h h h
= + + + =
= + + + =
5
10
( )
( )
2 2 2 22,2 , 2, , , , , ,
5 2 1 10 15 3 10 2,25 0 0 0 5,07 50,95 2
oo o oo o BCAB BD DE
t tax BDt ax AB N AB N BD M AB M BD M BC M DE BD DEAB BC
tt t tt t
h h h h
= + =
= + + + + 57 40,84 10,0
=
( )
3 3 3 33 , 3, , , , ,
5 510 1 2 1 1 10 10 2,25 0 0 3,8 3,8 3,8 3,8 1,27 1,27 39,086 100,95 2 0,95 2 2
oo o o
o BCAB BD DE
t t ax BD t N BD M AB M BD M BC M DE
AB BD BC DE
tt t tt
h h h h
= + =
= + + + + + =
5 5( 156,41 40,84 39,086) 10 158,164 10Ist it = = + =
4. Checking the free terms:
The free terms are correctly solved if the following condition is checked:o
II o
st it t ax t Ns Ms
tt h
= =
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
23/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
- 23 -
A
BC
D E
Ns
1
2
1
Mss
3
3,8
9,05
1,09
6,8
( )5
5
10 1 10 110 15 3 10 4,5 9 5,07 3 3 3,8 3,8
0,75 2 0,95 2
2 1 14,25 9,05 1,09 0,545 158,14 10
0,95 2 2
II
st
I
st
= + + +
+ + = =
The free terms are correctly calculated.
5. Solving the equation system ( )7 4 3 20 2,1 10 72 10 151,2 10E I kNm = =
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
78,67 16,87 43,69 236,5
16,87 10,86 1,35 61,75
43,69 1,35 41,8 59,1
X X X
X X X
X X X
+ =
+ = + =
with the following solution:
{ }
35.177
55.809
36.379
X
=
-
8/21/2019 frames_mf asdfg asdfg
24/24
Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iai Structural Statics Hyperstatic Structures
Department of Structural Mechanics Cezar Aanici, Dr. Eng.
6. Drawing the final internal efforts diagrams (on the original statically indeterminate system):
3,8 1,27
2,25
3
A
BC
D
E
100
100
100 20
0
80
36,379
55,809
35,177
105,53
138,24
52,07
46,44
M
32,71
55,809kN
19,43kN
35,177kN
N
Q
35,177kN
19,43kN
36,379kN