free trade vs. protectionism

15
Free Trade vs. Protectionism Frederick University 2012

Upload: mirra

Post on 07-Jan-2016

51 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Free Trade vs. Protectionism. Frederick University 2012. Free Trade vs. Protectionism. “If there were an Economist’s Creed it would surely contain the affirmations: ‘I understand the principle of comparative advantage’ and ‘I advocate free trade’” Paul Krugman. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Frederick University

2012

Page 2: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Free Trade vs. Protectionism

“If there were an Economist’s Creed it would surely contain the affirmations: ‘I understand the principle of comparative advantage’ and ‘I advocate free trade’”

Paul Krugman

Page 3: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Trade Protection (Protectionism) - Policies that limit imports, usually with the goal of protecting domestic producers in import-competing industries from foreign competition

Page 4: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Showing that free trade is better than no trade is not the same thing as showing that free trade is better than sophisticated government intervention

Page 5: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Trade Restrictions

Tariffs - taxes levied basically on imported goods. They are imposed as an attempt to raise foreign exchange revenue and increase the welfare at the expense of other nations.

Nontariff barriers - all forms of trade restrictions other than tariffs.

Page 6: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Tariffs ad valorem import tariff - expressed as a

percentage of the invoice value of the imported good

specific tariff - a fixed sum levied on a physical unit of the good no matter what its invoice price is

compound duty - a combination of ad valorem and specific duties

variable levy - calculated daily official prices - a basis for ad valorem duty

calculations

Page 7: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

The Effect of a Tariff

P

Q

D

S

Pd

Pw

Sd Dd}

M

} tPt

a

a – producer gain

c

a + b + c + d – consumer loss

St Dt

b d

c – government collection

b + d – deadweight loss

b – consumer loss due to thedemand shift to domestic supply

- production effect

d –consumer loss due to the reduction in consumption consumption effect

}

Page 8: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Nontariff barriers quantitative restrictions

Quotas - numerical limits for a specific kind of good that a country will permit to be imported without restriction during a specified period

Voluntary export restraints Tariff quotas -permit a stipulated amount to enter

the country duty free or at a low rate, but when that quantity is reached, a much higher duty is charged for subsequent importations

technical regulations administrative regulations other regulations of imports

Page 9: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

The Import QuotaP

Q

SdDd

Pw }

q

Sq

Pq

QsqQs QdQdq

a

a – producer gain

b c d

a + b + c + d – consumer loss

b + d – a loss to the country

c – transfer from domesticconsumers to someone else

Page 10: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Arguments for trade restrictions The need of protection of domestic labour markets

against cheap foreign labour The desire to reduce domestic unemployment The need to counteract dumping in international trade The need to protect the infant industries Protect industries important for national defence Decrease the national balance of payments deficit Improve the nation’s terms of trade and welfare Strategic trade policies The scientific tariff The need to protect national health and safety

standards

Page 11: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Strategic Trade Policies economies of scale justify the operation of just

one firm in the world market as a whole lucky firms in the industry may be able

generate returns higher than the opportunity costs of the resources they employ

the country can raise its national income at other countries’ expense if it can somehow ensure that the lucky firm that gets to earn excess returns is domestic rather than foreign

Page 12: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Strategic Trade Policies – an exampleAssumptions: Two companies from two countries are capable

of producing a good Neither country has any domestic demand for

the good – the good is intended solely for export The producer surplus coincides with the national

interest Each firm faces only a binary choice – either to

produce or not to produce The market is profitable for either firm if it

enters alone, unprofitable for both if both enter

Page 13: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Strategic Trade Policies – an example The good is a 150 – seat passenger aircraft The firms are Boeing and Airbus The countries are the U.S. and the EU

The Payoff Matrix

Airbus

P N

P   -5   0

Boeing -5   100  

  100   0

N 0   0  

Page 14: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Strategic Trade Policies – an example Boeing has some kind of head start that

allows it to commit itself to produce before Airbus’s decision

Boeing earns 100 while deterring entry by Airbus

The EU decides to subsidize Airbus at a point before Boeing is committed to produce

The EU pays a subsidy of 10 to Airbus if it produces the plain, regardless of what Boeing does

Page 15: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Strategic Trade Policies – an example

The Payoff Matrix after European Subsidy

Airbus

P N

P   5   0

Boeing - 5   100  

  110   0

N 0   0